- by: Fran Foo
- From: Australian IT
- August 14, 2013
- SUE DUNLEVY
- News Limited Network
- August 15, 2013
Lots more here:
For the last few months Dr Haikerwal and his colleagues (along with the AMA and the RaCGP) have been saying they are not happy with the way the PCEHR was evolving and the lack of clinical involvement in the overall process. NEHTA and DoHA did respond to this to some degree but apparently the response was either too little too late, not credible or not the right response and we have then seen what we seen.
There were also concerns about the fundamental design and its ultimate suitability for purpose.
There is another take on what is needed from Dr Edwin Kruys found here:
Very sensibly he has a major focus on Governance - a line I have pushed for years now!