tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post3621813128122376064..comments2024-03-29T09:18:22.495+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: I Wonder How Realistic NEHTA and DoHA Are About The NEHRS Patent Claims. The News Keeps Coming.Dr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-63402200953415854412013-06-21T22:54:45.320+10:002013-06-21T22:54:45.320+10:00MMR Global retaining Guy Sebastian on payroll I am...MMR Global retaining Guy Sebastian on payroll I am sure will increase their credibility in any patent discussions ;) <br />This really just an indication of their desire to run a PR attack to scare NEHTA/government into settling.<br /><br />Trolls...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-8030968215731207672013-06-19T11:37:24.972+10:002013-06-19T11:37:24.972+10:00MMRGlobal isn't going away. They now have att...MMRGlobal isn't going away. They now have attorneys in Australia retained. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/nehta-wins-a-472m-injection/story-fn4htb9o-1226665211001 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-27792795004849256392013-02-23T12:38:09.335+11:002013-02-23T12:38:09.335+11:00I have today registered my own patent described as...I have today registered my own patent described as<br /><br />when govt uses taxpayer funding for any program, project, service, etcetera those funds shall be deemed as to be similar to monopoly money and not treated as real money that may as example come from ones own pocket<br /><br />hence<br /><br />as it is not deemed real money no proof is needed that it was spent in the best interests of Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-75351271443792597702013-02-21T14:31:20.555+11:002013-02-21T14:31:20.555+11:00NOTE: This is not legal advice....!
If you look a...NOTE: This is not legal advice....!<br /><br />If you look at Claim#1 of the two patents, then you can see why the PCEHR is not worried.....<br /><br />It includes "assigning a phone number individually associated with the consumer for fax and voice communications from a healthcare provider"<br />(most of the claim is about phone/fax communication between the consumer and the provider)<Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04846004971284077754noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-10385282840292728062013-02-21T10:34:05.553+11:002013-02-21T10:34:05.553+11:00I agree. Attributing this sort of thing to conspir...I agree. Attributing this sort of thing to conspiracy is not useful. Much can be learned from Sir Bernard Ingham:<br /><br />Many journalists have fallen for the conspiracy theory of government. I do assure you that they would produce more accurate work if they adhered to the cock-up theory.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-62691769655690883642013-02-21T09:53:35.573+11:002013-02-21T09:53:35.573+11:00> Does anyone think Davies Collison Cave,
> ...> Does anyone think Davies Collison Cave,<br />> being the very agents for MMR's Australian<br />> patents were some how involved in this<br />> preliminary research in support of NEHTA/DoHA?<br /><br />No.<br /><br />They are a big IP law firm. It is perfectly possible for them to both be patent agents for<br />a patent application 5 years ago (they would handle thousands of Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-38804506826705098572013-02-21T09:46:13.775+11:002013-02-21T09:46:13.775+11:00Does this remind you of anyone?
http://www.dilber...Does this remind you of anyone?<br /><br />http://www.dilbert.com/2013-02-19/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-78778534745015749402013-02-21T09:32:25.614+11:002013-02-21T09:32:25.614+11:00Nothing but a patent troll. IP Australia should n...Nothing but a patent troll. IP Australia should never have accepted the patent in the first place.<br /><br />Looking at 2006202057 : Method and system for providing online medical records, it looks as though they have simply patented the entire idea of the PCEHR. There is no product or invention as such that I can see from my brief look.<br /><br />To me it's like patenting an idea to haveDerycknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-62655733847762644772013-02-21T03:44:59.501+11:002013-02-21T03:44:59.501+11:00Does anyone think Davies Collison Cave, being the ...Does anyone think Davies Collison Cave, being the very agents for MMR's Australian patents were some how involved in this preliminary research in support of NEHTA/DoHA? Wouldnt that reflect negatively on them if that was the case?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-74836601092872460832013-02-20T18:28:49.563+11:002013-02-20T18:28:49.563+11:00Any company that goes public with regard a patent ...Any company that goes public with regard a patent breach generally has good grounds, otherwise they would not have gone public. By doing this in the public domain and against a government entity means that they are seeking substantial damages. In instances like this the government of the day just want things to go away (like KR) and I am sure that they will settle, especially in an election year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com