tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post4532118416520998437..comments2024-03-28T17:49:03.998+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: This All Strongly Suggests The Information Management Controls And Governance Of The PCEHR Are Both Unsafe and Poor.Dr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-82880697843786477932015-03-31T21:35:26.963+11:002015-03-31T21:35:26.963+11:00yes of course it gets tested- in production once i...yes of course it gets tested- in production once it has gone live!<br /><br />Who is responsible for the system? No one and everyone. Depends on how you define the system. Is it the dumb document repository or is it the gp software?<br /><br />Perhaps we should blame the meat inspectors?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-34375394995771864522015-03-31T09:29:27.841+11:002015-03-31T09:29:27.841+11:00Doesn't anyone test anything these days? Inclu...Doesn't anyone test anything these days? Including Accenture, as proxy system operator.<br /><br />In fact, here's a question.... who's responsible for the system?<br /><br />And yes, the PCEHR is a dumb system, in more ways than one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-80716862432695571282015-03-30T20:16:48.412+11:002015-03-30T20:16:48.412+11:00I beg to differ, the PCEHR as a system is not at f...I beg to differ, the PCEHR as a system is not at fualt here, its just a dumb document store. The article states the error came from a digital package via NeHHTA, i am not sure NEHTA should or is proving anything other than sample code and guidance.<br /><br />I am intrigued as to how the term meat inspector would creep into software designed for clinical use <br /><br />This by no means detracts Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-91527700250333444692015-03-30T10:05:42.657+11:002015-03-30T10:05:42.657+11:00I doubt that NEHTA have anything at all to do with...I doubt that NEHTA have anything at all to do with this.<br /><br />DOHA have outsourced everything to Accenture, who run the thing as a managed service, so maybe it's Accenture who is a fault.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-54406796129523937632015-03-30T07:49:39.598+11:002015-03-30T07:49:39.598+11:00Anon March 29, 2015 10:46. Working for a software ...Anon March 29, 2015 10:46. Working for a software house, we have gone through NEHTA CCA, once connected to the PCEHR, we no longer need to include this step in our release plans for major releases. I am told soon you won't even need nehta at all the market will do self assertation Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-76816277679158693642015-03-29T22:46:08.422+11:002015-03-29T22:46:08.422+11:00Whatever the actual error is, it is just another e...Whatever the actual error is, it is just another example of why people mistrust the PCEHR system. Watch the blame happening here: is it DOHA, NEHTA, or Zedmed's fault? Somewhere in this 'system', there should be some validation checks that reject things like 'meat inspectors'. The system as a whole has to be accountable as a trusted architecture that can deliver accurate Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-46064480672937574712015-03-29T17:50:21.221+11:002015-03-29T17:50:21.221+11:00So if this is a result of a digital library suppli...So if this is a result of a digital library supplied by NEHTA, which would,mean that it is part of the implemeters toolkits, found under the ehealth reference platform, which there is absolutly nothing wrong with that.<br /><br />My concern is that the reference platform thing claims to be backed by a lot of expertise technically, it also claims that data is clinically validated.<br /><br />Q1, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com