tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post5325587394475133159..comments2024-03-29T09:18:22.495+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: France Takes An Interesting E-Health Path. Any Useful Learnings?Dr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-24797049144478001502010-07-20T12:57:08.581+10:002010-07-20T12:57:08.581+10:00I agree. They should be talking about a PHR first ...I agree. They should be talking about a PHR first and an EMR later as terms.(Shared or not to create a SEHR etc is a separate story to a degree).<br /><br />David.Dr David G More MB PhDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-43745799712385630232010-07-20T12:52:14.451+10:002010-07-20T12:52:14.451+10:00This article again mixes up those most basic defin...This article again mixes up those most basic definitions.<br /><br />First if calls its system an EHR. The DMP is initially a patient entered health record. This is usually called a Personal Health Record (PHR).<br /><br />Near the end of the extract it calls an EHR (SEHR) an EPR. EPR is not one of the usual terms.<br /><br />All this redefinition of terms really only leads to confusion. David, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com