tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post6225078688394714545..comments2024-03-28T17:49:03.998+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: Here Is Another Very Good Reason For Not Putting Sensitive Information In Your NEHRS / PCEHRDr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-52933119900671138902012-12-07T08:08:32.102+11:002012-12-07T08:08:32.102+11:00"more detailed guidance about access to the P..."more detailed guidance about access to the PCEHR data for research purposes"<br /><br />Some basic questions come to mind:<br /><br />1. Does 19 health summaries make a valid sample size?<br /><br />2. Sounds like another Accenture/IBM beat up to me, maybe they have another system waiting to be purchased or justified?<br /><br />3. How about they fix up the PCEHR mess first, hang on , Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-76442076634346608222012-12-06T18:04:22.554+11:002012-12-06T18:04:22.554+11:00Well spotted - done!
If I could be paid as much a...Well spotted - done!<br /><br />If I could be paid as much as that other blogger is rumoured to have been paid..sigh!<br /><br />David.Dr David G More MB PhDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-45474438614184845572012-12-06T17:49:39.320+11:002012-12-06T17:49:39.320+11:00Shouldn't "To" == "For Not"...Shouldn't "To" == "For Not" in the Title?<br /><br />Help must be freezing over if you're now advocating and evangelising the PCEHR/NEHRS now David??<br /><br />Next you'll be working for either NEHTA or DOHA or both, heaven forbid!<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com