Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, January 27, 2011

The International Telecommunications Union Issues A Status Report on E-Health Standards.

An interesting summary report from the ITU appeared a little while ago. The report is titled:

Standards and eHealth

ITU‐T Technology Watch Report January 2011

The full report can be downloaded from here:

http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/23/01/T23010000120001PDFE.pdf

V. Conclusion: Standards and eHealth

eHealth standardization is inherently a complicated area. eHealth systems have to connect many stakeholders ‐ hospitals, pharmacies, primary care physicians, patients in their homes, and administrative entities such as insurance companies or government agencies. Each of these entities has an enormous installed base of technologies, information systems, and medical devices, often based upon proprietary specifications. Electronically integrating these entities will be a great challenge for technical standardization. A second requirement complicating the standards landscape for eHealth is the inherently sensitive nature of the information, requiring a high degree of privacy protections, quality assurance, and security. The health sector is also heavily regulated by national authorities. New technologies can present a risk of not meeting those regulations. Furthermore, health practitioners can be inherently risk adverse and reluctant to adopt new technologies.

As described above, many eHealth standards initiatives exist but many questions remain about whether some of these initiatives are in competition or conflict; whether standards will be adequately implemented by health care providers; and whether there will be interoperability among various efforts. There are also different approaches to eHealth standardization in different countries and regions, a condition which will may impinge upon the efficacy of eHealth standards efforts and complicate standards adoption policies of device and systems manufacturers that sell globally.

There is no question that eHealth is in a period of rapid technical, economic, and social transition. In the foreseeable future, common digital formats and structures have the potential to allow for the exchange of integrated patient information among all of the patient’s medical providers. Multimedia and messaging standards can continue to improve remote clinical care, remote patient monitoring, and remote diagnostics. Beyond remote access, it can also facilitate exchange of information and collaboration among various health practitioners, as well as portability of results to be shared, for example, at a later date by the patient with another practitioner. Anonymized and aggregated public health data stored in common, digital formats can improve medical research and digitally stored genetic data can provide more customized medical care to patients. Universal standardization, whether driven through private industry collaborations or through government standards policies, is a necessary precursor for any of these eHealth advancements. There are three reasons for this:

Technical Interoperability: eHealth applications such as remote diagnostic systems and electronic medical records will only be successful if there is a high degree of interoperability among the institutional systems exchanging this information, and a high degree of compatibility among medical devices and digital systems, regardless of manufacturer;

Economic Efficiency: Medical providers and public entities will invest in costly eHealth solutions only if assured that the systems will have some longevity into the future rather than becoming quickly deprecatedbecause of the introduction of yet more eHealth standards options. Globally (or at least regionally/ nationally) agreed‐upon standards can provide the necessary stability to economically incentivize new investments and, if openly available rather than proprietary, can help foster economic competition among compatible eHealth systems and equipment made by different manufacturers or systems developers.

Public Accountability: To an even greater extent than most types of technical standards, the design decisions underlying eHealth standards will have public interest effects in areas such as individual privacy, nondiscriminatory access to healthcare, and the overall public good. These decisions should be made with some type of global public accountability, whether developed in a multistakeholder fashion or at least openly available to the public for oversight.

----- End Conclusions

The report is worth a read as it does explain a good number of the issues and makes clear the complexity that is faced by all involved.

David.

Some Don’t Miss Comments on the PCEHR Post. These Are The Best Ever!

As I note the commenters on this post are trying to do me out of a job!

Click here and get the real lowdown on how things are working and why the PCEHR project is a disaster waiting to happen.

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2011/01/pcehr-seems-to-be-still-lacking-real.html#comments

To those providing the input - thanks and keep it coming!

Enjoy (and quietly cry into your beer)!

David.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

The PCEHR Seems To Be Still Lacking Real Detail! There is Still No Evidence That DoHA / NEHTA Know What They Are Doing.

The following report of a briefing held last week appeared today.

Bidders seek details on $467m personally controlled e-health record project

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • January 26, 2011 1:02PM

POTENTIAL candidates for the job of keeping the $467 million nationwide electronic patient records rollout on track want greater clarity on the sprawling work program.

The Gillard government is seeking a private partner to build an analytical and evaluation framework to monitor and measure progress of the personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) as it is introduced over the next 18 months.

But bidders have asked for a list or directory of relevant activities being undertaken by the National E-Health Transition Authority to assess the scope of job ahead.

"It seems there are a whole lot of websites all over the place, but no-one’s actually got it all together," one asked Health in a series of questions and answers released yesterday to registered bidders. "Is that part of the tender?"

Another says there appears to be "many health providers, government departments and other organisations that NEHTA has been involved with, either peripherally or centrally. Is there a list that will enable the successful tenderer to properly evaluate and monitor it?"

In response, the Health department said it does not expect tenderers to have a "line by line" understanding of NEHTA’s program at present.

Bidders also questioned whether there was any other system on the same scale as the PCEHR in existence. Health replied: "There is no single solution in place that meets all of the requirements and specifications of the PCEHR program."

"(But) every single component of the PCEHR has been implemented successfully somewhere in the world. So the system components do exist.

"Some PCEHR infrastructure components have already been implemented in Australia, while others have been implemented overseas."

Health acting deputy secretary Megan Morris told an industry briefing last week the PCEHR would provide summaries of patient health information including medications, immunisation and test results over the internet via secure access.

"The government has adopted a combined approach of ‘top down’ initiatives and ‘bottom up’ lead implementation sites," she said. "We will create a national framework to guide development and impose uniform standards, including a national privacy regime and change and adoption framework.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/bidders-seek-details-on-467m-personally-controlled-e-health-record-project/story-fn4htb9o-1225994842659

You can visit the site and see the presentations here:

PCEHR Industry Briefing

On Monday, 17 January 2011 the eHealth Systems Branch, Primary and Ambulatory Care Division of the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing held an industry briefing in Canberra. The purpose of the briefing was to provide further information and clarification regarding the Request for Tender (RFT) for a Benefits and Evaluation Partner for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) Program.

Informative presentations were given and attendees’ questions were answered by representatives of the Department of Health and Ageing and the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA) regarding the requirements of the RFT, and the wider PCEHR Program. These are available below for download.

PCEHR System Overview - Speech Notes (PDF 39 KB)

PCEHR System Overview - Slides (PDF 870 KB)

PCEHR Work Program - Slides (PDF 3443 KB)

BEP Scope of Services and Tender Submission Requirements - Speech Notes (PDF 49 KB)

BEP Scope of Services and Tender Submission Requirements - Slides (PDF 231 KB)

Questions and Answers (PDF 18 KB)

Here is the URL:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pcehr-industry-briefing

The Q & A Session was very revealing:

Question: Does a list or directory of NEHTA’s PCEHR Program activities exist? From looking at the website, it seems as though there are a whole lot of websites all over the place, but no one’s actually got it all together, and is that part of the tender?

Answer:

The Department does not expect that tenderers will have a line-by-line understanding of the program of work that’s being undertaken within NEHTA at present. The core documentation associated with the PCEHR Program has been made available to tenderers, and will be sufficient to enable the Department to undertake an appropriate capability assessment of tenders. Other documents that may be relevant have been identified by the Department and will be made available to the successful tenderer.

Question: There appear to be many health providers, government departments, and other organisations that NEHTA has been involved with either peripherally or centrally. Is there a list or directory of all of this activity that will enable the successful tenderer to properly evaluate and monitor it?

Answer:

The evaluation only refers to the eHealth sites and the build and rollout of the PCEHR Program. Wider health reform is a broader program, which is being managed by the Department of Health and Ageing on behalf of the Australian government. The PCEHR Program is only one stream of work within broader health reform. I provided details regarding NEHTA’s broader range of health activities and business blueprint in my earlier presentation and slides. The Draft Concept of Operations for the PCEHR Program is available to tenderers.

Question: You mentioned that the evaluation of tenders for the second wave of eHealth sites is underway. When do you expect that the evaluation process will be completed, and when will we receive information about the size and location of those sites?

Answer:

The applications for second wave eHealth sites closed shortly before Christmas, and the evaluation of applications is still underway. The Department is endeavouring to have a short list finalised within the next few weeks.

Question: As part of the services of the Benefits and Evaluation Partner, will the Department be requiring any capability transfer back to NEHTA or the Department, and by June 2012 from the tenderer back to the Department? Also, are there any conflict of interest restrictions on subcontractors, or any other organisation that may wish to tender for other PCEHR Program work?

Answer:

Yes, the Department expects that the Benefits and Evaluation Partner’s capability will be easily transferable to the Department, NEHTA, and other PCEHR Program partners. There is nothing that would prevent an organisation from tendering for other PCEHR Program work. However, please note that the RFT for the Benefits and Evaluation Partner states that “the Department may, at its sole discretion, exclude a Tender from further consideration, where it considers that a material conflict of interest or potential material conflict of interest would exist if the Tenderer was successful in being awarded a contract” (see Part B, page B24, clause 8.12.2 of the RFT).

Question: Is there any other system or solution that is of the same scale as the PCEHR system?

Answer:

There is no single solution in place that meets all of the requirements and specifications of the PCEHR Program.

Answer:

Every single component of the PCEHR system has been implemented successfully somewhere in the world. So the system components do exist. Some PCEHR system infrastructure components have already been implemented in Australia, while others have been implemented overseas.

Question: In the RFT, it is stated that the successful tenderer will “where possible, consider state and territory eHealth activity which is of relevance to the PCEHR Program” (Part B, page B10, clause 5.2.2(d)). What does the Department mean by “where possible”? Does this mean that the jurisdictions may not provide the PCEHR system with full access to necessary medical information and eHealth summaries?

Answer:

The jurisdictions have been heavily involved with the Department throughout the PCEHR Program, and are a key party to the governance arrangements. It is expected that this level of engagement will continue throughout the build and rollout of the PCEHR Program.

Answer:

State jurisdictions need to make significant investments to enable the PCEHR Program to work. State jurisdictions are developing similar business cases and are allocating funding to their acute sector programs. These acute sector programs will establish links to the PCEHR system.

---- End Q & A.

My view is that all this leaves way more unanswered that actually addressed and I still have the sense the no-one at DoHA or NEHTA actually knows what they are doing. These slides and briefing go no way to assure me anything I wrote here is at all wrong:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2011/01/clinician-controlled-electronic.html

If they were confident they had substantial and credible answers then we would have the PCEHR Concept of Operations available for review and discussion. Until that is released we know that DoHA and NEHTA are as much in the dark as they are keeping the rest of us.

At present all I can see that is going to be delivered by 2012 are a range of incoherent pilots which will take the rest of the decade to be properly delivered so as to provide any value to either providers or consumers.

David.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Where To Next for the Victorian HealthSMART Program? A Major Clinician Guided Mid-Course Review is Vital!

This program has suddenly got itself into the news.

Yesterday we had this:

Health myki faces axe

Kate Hagan

January 24, 2011

THE state government is considering abandoning Victoria's trouble-plagued $360 million health technology program, with Health Minister David Davis admitting he faces ''a genuine dilemma with 'the myki of the health system' ''.

The HealthSMART program - five years late and $35 million over budget - is supposed to link computer systems in hospitals and introduce processes such as electronic prescribing.

But clinical applications are only partially running in just four hospitals, and doctors say patient safety is compromised by inadequate procedures that causes them to duplicate paperwork, chase test results and compete for access to computer terminals.

In a state budget submission, the Australian Medical Association has called for a further $328 million to be invested on health technology over the next four years, with a focus on providing ready access to patient records, test results and medication details.

AMA Victoria president Harry Hemley said health technology in Victoria bordered on the embarrassing, and ''patients would be appalled at the lack of IT, computers and connectivity between different areas of the health system''.

Mr Davis said the HealthSMART program, launched by the former Labor government in 2003, had been ''botched in its introduction'' and was tens of millions of dollars over budget without achieving its stated aims.

''The new government faces a genuine dilemma with the myki of the health system,'' he said. ''On the one side we have large sunk costs, and on the other a system that has failed to meet expectations.''

Mr Davis said technology was ''a critical part of improving the performance and quality of our health system'', and the AMA's submission would be considered as part of the budget process.

Dr Hemley said many promises had been made about HealthSMART's ability to revolutionise technology in hospitals, but the project had been bitterly disappointing despite hundreds of millions of dollars in investment.

''HealthSMART still has potential to deliver a vastly superior health IT system but it needs to be seen as an ongoing investment,'' he said.

More here:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/health-myki-faces-axe-20110123-1a17g.html

and here:

Health IT program Healthsmart faces the axe

  • Jessica Craven
  • From: Herald Sun
  • January 24, 2011 12:43AM

THE future of a $360 million program designed to improve care in Victorian hospitals is under a cloud.

The Australian Medical Association has called for an additional $260 million to be invested in the botched HealthSMART program, which is five years late and $35 million over budget.

More here:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/health-it-program-faces-the-axe/story-e6frf7jo-1225993351106

This was followed by these today:

System is sick, not dead

Dr Harry Hemley

January 25, 2011

FOR those unfamiliar with computer systems in Victoria's public hospitals, you would probably have to cast your mind back to the early 1990s to realise just how poor the information technology networks are in our supposedly world-class health program.

We're talking paper-based records, people queuing to use the available computer terminals and the difficulty sharing information with off-site colleagues. For patients in our public hospitals, the ramifications of poor IT systems are serious.

The problem starts from the time a person is treated in the emergency department and doctors and nurses aren't able to get access to the person's history of care with their general practitioner.

In the absence of a central health database that stores the history of patients' illnesses, treatments and medications, medical staff have to piece together this information from the patient's own memory in a process that requires trial and error.

On a good day, the patient will have a list of their medications and illnesses but typically their memory extends more to the colour of the tablet and a vague recollection that the name of the drug begins with an N.

Once the patient is admitted, staff on the wards have to queue to use a computer so they can access the patient's hospital records and diagnostic information. When staff are finally able to get on a computer, the system is slow and clunky and crashes all too common.

The lack of connectivity between different areas of the health system means medication lists, tests, scans and other diagnostic tools are often repeated. Health dollars and clinicians' time are wasted chasing results and duplicating services in an already stretched public hospital system.

The quality of care is compromised and patients are at increased risk of mistakes being made in their treatment, diagnosis and prescription of medication.

More here:

http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/system-is-sick-not-dead-20110124-1a2y4.html

and this:

'Too late' to kill e-health program

Kate Hagan

January 25, 2011

THE state government should stick with Victoria's bungled $360 million health technology program because it was finally starting to deliver some benefits, an e-health expert has argued.

Mukesh Haikerwal, who is the federal government's clinical advisor on e-health, said the HealthSMART program had ''a long tortuous history'' but cost savings would not be made by ditching it, only to start again from scratch to build an electronic system to share patient information in hospitals.

The Age revealed yesterday that the state government was considering abandoning the program, which is five years late and $35 million over budget.

Health Minister David Davis said the new government faced ''a genuine dilemma with the myki of the health system''.

HealthSMART, originally due to be completed in 2007, replaced existing financial management systems in hospitals. It was also supposed to introduce clinical systems for electronic prescribing, ordering tests and reporting results to Victorian hospitals, but those programs are now partially running in just four hospitals.

More here:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/too-late-to-kill-ehealth-program-20110124-1a2w2.html

There is also coverage today in the AFR and a few other places.

For those that are interested I have been on this case for a while now:

See here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/06/despite-some-successes-healthsmart-in.html

and as far back as here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2008/04/healthsmart-pretty-bad-report-card.html

and here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2007/06/is-healthsmart-as-smart-as-it-claims.html

There are a few facts that need to be clear:

First the program is way behind time and over budget.

Second it seems that there has been pretty intense resistance to many clinical applications from the clinicians who are expected to use the software.

Third if the program is to continue as it is presently planned there are a few years to go before key clinical functionality will be universally available - and remember this was the key goal.

Fourth non HealthSMART initiatives like PACS have gone pretty well as have a range of administrative and basic operational systems.

The bottom line is that all this should not be thrown out - that would be nonsense. What is needed is a clinician focussed in-depth review to establish what is needed to obtain genuine clinician commitment to adoption and use of what is presently on offer for clinicians - with the live option of starting again - with another vendor - in this domain if the present vendor cannot demonstrate they can deliver what clinicians believe they actually need.

This review needs to be externally facilitated, independent and not controlled by the Program in any way. Clinicians need to know their needs are understood and will be answered.

Indeed they need to know they can veto the whole clinical program, by some reasonable democratic process, unless their legitimate needs are actually addressed.

If this is not done - and fast - the entire fiasco will collapse and lead to much increased cost and time wasting. Having come this far and spent this much it is vital that whatever is needed is done to sort out the area of the program where most of the benefits will ultimately flow from!

I note that even after 1 day it is clear this weeks poll is going to say that right now the Program is a total mess!

The national implications for e-Health also should not be ignored, as they are pretty substantial.

David.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 24 January, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment:

I have to say I think the best thing was the discussion that followed the bog on the excellent article on the state of the Health IT software industry last Tuesday from Karen Dearne in the Australian.

See here for the link and to read the comments - currently 27 of them.

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2011/01/causes-of-this-mess-are-pretty-clear-in.html

It was also good to note that NEHTA was sufficiently connected to the rest of the world to note the debate that had been triggered by the PCAST report on just how health information should be managed and secured.

I first covered this report in mid-December, 2010 and you can read that coverage here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/12/is-this-really-major-change-for-health.html

It is fair to say that a lot of discussion has indeed followed and that the Office of the National Co-ordinator for Health IT is now conducting formal consultations on the report.

See here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110110/NEWS/110119997/

Deadline for comment have also been extended so I think this is being taken pretty seriously - as one might imagine a Presidential Commission report would be!

I suspect I will have a few comments on the news that the Victorian HealthSmart Project might be canned tomorrow.

See here:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/health-myki-faces-axe-20110123-1a17g.html

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/record-system-is-back-on-track-defence/story-e6frgakx-1225989788681

Record system is back on track: Defence

DEFENCE has kick-started its overdue e-health record system for armed forces personnel, awarding a $6.1 million three-year project management contract to consultant and IT services provider Oakton.

DEFENCE has kick-started its overdue e-health record system for armed forces personnel, awarding a $6.1 million three-year project management contract to consultant and IT services provider Oakton.

The successor to HealthKeys, sidelined in 2009 after years of work with only 40 per cent of medical files converted from paper, was to be a commercial off-the-shelf system.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/electronic-health-market-value-proves-unclear/story-e6frgakx-1225989800859

Electronic health market value proves unclear

THE Gillard government's personally controlled e-health records and telehealth incentives are expected to be hotspots for health IT this year.

But potential market size and speed of uptake are still uncertain.

IDC Australia senior market analyst Emilie Ditton is re-examining the prospects, after the research firm forecast in the middle of last year that the local health technology market would reach $2.4 billion this year.

"The government has committed to spending $467m on an electronic medical records system by 2012," Ms Ditton said.

"A number of vendors I have spoken to have identified this as an area of opportunity for them," Ms Ditton added.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/poor-prognosis-for-medical-software-sector/story-e6frgakx-1225989797345

Poor prognosis for medical software sector

THE medical software sector hit the wall last year, with large and small players that had geared for expansion hit by a triple whammy.

Long-anticipated e-health projects did not materialise, the global financial crisis had people scrimping every last penny, and currency exchange losses added insult to injury (see table).

Medical Software Industry Association president Geoffrey Sayer said it had been a tough period for the sector.

"The outlook for e-health in 2011 is challenging for everyone, to say the least," he said. If we are to be successful, we will need to establish a transparent leadership partnership between all stakeholders that delivers tangible and measurable benefits."

Australia's largest health IT company, iSoft, crashed hard, but it was by no means the only local firm to bleed red ink in a year that also brought a retreat from the sector.

-----

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/gamer-danger-kinect-xbox-injury-alert-20110118-19umx.html

Gamer danger: Kinect Xbox injury alert

Louisa Hearn

January 18, 2011 - 2:13PM

It has inspired a legion of gamers to abandon joysticks and couches in favour of jumping and gyrating their way around the lounge room, but doctors warn that Microsoft's Kinect controller may spell the start of a new generation of gaming injuries.

Collisions, sprains, ruptured ligaments and even broken bones now seem as likely to occur in the home as on the sports field for the 8 million people who have bought the new Kinect Xbox 360 controller since its release late last year.

Physical injuries first became associated with computer gaming after the release of Nintendo's Wii motion sensitive controller, which revolutionised game play and, wisely, the Wii remote was always sold with a rubber outer designed to limit the damage from contact with home furnishings and other players.

Now Kinect has dispensed with a controller altogether, replacing it with motion tracking technology, and freeing up gamers' movements completely. With the accompanying release of action-oriented games such as Dance Central and Kinect Sports, the injury count appears to be mounting.

-----

http://delimiter.com.au/2011/01/19/health-departments-shun-official-ipad-trials/

Health departments shun official iPad trials

Consumers love it. Business professionals in a wide range of fields love it. Politicians (hello, Mr Turnbull) love it. Even babies love it. And increasingly, doctors and other medical professionals love it. But six months after the iPad launched in Australia and with the hyped Apple tablet selling like hotcakes, Australia’s health departments don’t yet appear to be that interested in the device.

In separate statements issued over the past week, the health departments of most of Australia’s largest states have made it clear they have so far shunned official trials of the device in medical facilities round the nation.

The Northern Territory, New South Wales and South Australia health departments have no formal proposal for clinical use of the device. Even Victoria — where former Premier, John Brumby, had promised to deliver an iPad to each Victorian public hospital doctor if re-elected, and where 500 devices were already handed over — seems to be far from considering an official trial in the healthcare field.

-----

http://www.seek.com.au/Job/stakeholder-engagement-analyst/in/sydney-cbd-inner-west-eastern-suburbs/18925060

Stakeholder Engagement Analyst

  • CBD location, some interstate travel
  • Internal & external stakeholder management

Do you want to improve the health of the nation?

Do you want to be part of the largest national e-health transformation project in Australia, the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR)?

NEHTA is currently recruiting people with a desire to make a difference to health outcomes, that are passionate about the use of ehealth to meet these goals and who have the relevant experience to deliver solutions in a highly complex stakeholder and technical environment. In these roles you will be working with consumers and clinicians who will be defining how models of care can be improved using the PCEHR. You will be delivering the solutions that will be in place for your grandparents, parents and your children... and for you as you engage with the public and private health system.

This is an exciting opportunity for an engagement professional with a proven track record of effective engagement with internal and external stakeholders.

-----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/health-appoints-new-cio-339307430.htm

Health appoints new CIO

By Josh Taylor, ZDNet.com.au on November 22nd, 2010

The Department of Health and Ageing has announced the appointment of former Australian Taxation Office business solutions manager Paul Madden as its new chief information and knowledge officer.

The appointment was announced by department secretary Jane Halton in an email to staff on Friday.

"I am pleased to announce the outcome of the recent Chief Information and Knowledge Officer … recruitment process. As a result of this process, Mr Paul Madden has been promoted to this position," Halton said in the email provided to ZDNet Australia.

-----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/healthscope-looks-for-growth-focused-cio-339308619.htm

Healthscope looks for growth-focused CIO

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au on January 17th, 2011

Healthscope is on the lookout for a new chief information officer, advertising for an executive with at least 15 years IT experience to take the reins of its technology.

The employer of 18,000 staff is currently undergoing rapid growth, according to the advertisements on MyCareer and Seek, with the new CIO to be tasked with overseeing growth in the IT division.

According to a more detailed position description on Healthscope's website, the CIO will be directing a unit with around 60 staff and a budget of $25 million annually.

The department services 45 Healthscope-owned hospital facilities and three facilities managed for the Adelaide healthcare alliance. Healthscope also has an international pathology business comprising of 60 laboratories in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Malaysia.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/electronic-health-market-value-proves-unclear/story-e6frgakx-1225989800859

Consultant fills in key role in e-health pilot

BUREAUCRAT turned private consultant Anthony Honeyman is overseeing the federal Health Department's handling of more than 90 proposals for grants under the $55 million e-health pilot fund.

A partner of government consultancy specialist Apis Group, Mr Honeyman is filling in for e-health systems branch head Sharon McCarter this month.

Apis won a $1.4m select tender to provide project management services to Health for the personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) initiative for six months to June 30.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/web-of-services-helps-battle-the-blues-depression/story-e6frg8y6-1225991969173

Web of services helps battle the blues: depression

* Paul Christensen

* From: The Australian

* January 22, 2011 12:00AM

FROM online men's sheds and iPads to data mining for diagnosis, the national depression initiative beyondblue has seen it all since it was established a little more than 10 years ago.

"It's been a wonderful journey," recalls beyondblue's chairman, former Victorian premier and Hawthorn Football Club president Jeff Kennett. "I never expected it to be a period of enlightenment for me, but it's certainly been that."

For Kennett, that means enlightenment about human nature above all: "There have been some sad stories, there have also been a lot of good stories."

The initiative originally was envisioned as a five-year project, but Kennett believes that what kept it going is a willingness to embrace new forms of communication, such as the Shed Online, an electronic version of the men's shed movement.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/373575/tasmanian_department_health_ditches_paper_goes_digital/?eid=-6787&uid=25465

Tasmanian Department of Health ditches paper, goes digital

Over 60,000 patient records to be converted

As part of its goal to introduce electronic health records, The Tasmanian Department of Health and Human Services is to shortly convert 60,000 paper based records into a digital format.

The records, which are held at North West Regional Hospital and Mersey Community Hospital in Tasmania, will be scanned and put into the North West Area Health Services digital records system. An additional 140,000 records will be digitised in the future.

North West Regional Hospital currently uses a paper-based patient record system that is managed electronically by a software system called iPatient Manager (iPM). This is used state-wide as the Department’s Patient Administration System (PAS). iPM will still be used once patient records are scanned.

-----

http://ehealthspace.org/news/obama-ehealth-report-ignites-controversy

Obama ehealth report ignites controversy

A report issued to US president Barack Obama on health information standards has caused controversy in health informatics circles.

Written by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, the report calls for a single universal standard for the electronic exchange of health information within the US. It also calls for a national infrastructure to facilitate the creation of the standard.

“It is a controversial report,” said NEHTA chief architect Andy Bond. “It is very broad in its coverage, and is based on a presumption that you can create XML to create the building blocks of a universal exchange language. It’s a nirvana vision, and it disregards the fact that people have been working in this area for the last two decades.”

The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has a glittering membership, including Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer at Microsoft, and Eric Schmidt, chairman and chief executive of Google.

-----

http://www.mjainsight.com.au/view?post=juanita-fernando-privacy-lags-as-e-health-rolls-out&post_id=1414&cat=comment

Juanita Fernando: Privacy lags as e-health rolls out

CONCERNS about e-health privacy are growing around the world.

Most recently, the British Medical Association Scotland called for stronger measures to protect patient confidentiality, particularly with the way patient information can be shared between medical users.

The Australian Privacy Foundation (APF) has highlighted similar concerns about the situation in Australia.

Empirical research findings show clinical end-users frequently covertly share credentials such as user names and passwords so they can share health data.

This may occur because the clinician who has the necessary password access to health data is absent or a particular system has not been used for a while and their password has expired.

-----

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Vodafone-security-still-vulnerable-report-pd20110116-D648Y?OpenDocument

Vodafone security still vulnerable: report

Published 2:47 PM, 16 Jan 2011

Telecommunications provider Vodafone has moved to urgently overhaul its security systems, with a series of breaches leading the firm to order daily password changes and scrap shared access logons, according to a Fairfax Media report.

Last week, Vodafone staff in New South Wales were fired for hacking into databases to illegally access customer information, leading to NSW police being called in.

The company has launched an investigation to determine whether any of its employees sold customer database passwords to criminals.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/julia-gillard-backs-foi-exemption-for-taxpayer-funded-nbn/story-fn59niix-1225990173260

Julia Gillard backs FOI exemption for taxpayer-funded NBN

JULIA Gillard is standing by an exemption from freedom of information laws for NBN Co - the publicly-owned company building Australia's biggest infrastructure project.

As an incorporated company, NBN Co will avoid FOI scrutiny, unlike Australia Post, the ABC, SBS and Telstra before it was privatised.

The Prime Minister today confirmed the public would not get access to information held by the company rolling out the $36 billion National Broadband Network.

“My understanding is that this is the ordinary operation of the Freedom of Information Act; that a body like NBN Co would not be subject to it,” Ms Gillard said.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/vint-cerfs-message-to-australia-internet-censorship-isnt-effective/story-e6frgakx-1225992330849

Vint Cerf's message to Australia: internet censorship isn't effective

  • UPDATED Fran Foo
  • From: Australian IT
  • January 21, 2011 7:38PM

JULIA Gillard's bid to censor the internet is not an "effective move", says Vint Cerf, one of the founding fathers of the internet and Google's chief web evangelist.

Dr Cerf's advice is to attack the source of a problem at the production layer, instead of focusing on the distribution layer.

The federal government wants to force every ISP to filter websites rated with a refused classification tag, in accordance with a secret government blacklist.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/exec-tech/your-bonsai-corporate-data-centre-network-attached-storage-devices/story-e6frgazf-1225989743852

Your bonsai corporate data centre: network attached storage devices

NETWORK attached storage boxes are finding their way into growing numbers of homes and small businesses.

Essentially a box filled with hard drives, a NAS device provides the centralised, secure storage that's becoming increasingly necessary in today's digital world. With gigabytes of data stored in everything from notebook PCs and tablets to mobile phones and cameras, managing it all has become a challenge.

In large organisations, such management is the responsibility of the IT department, but in smaller businesses and the home, it often rests with the resident techie. Charged with keeping track of everything from files and documents to photos and video, they find themselves searching for a straightforward way to keep everything in order.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 54 – Results – 24 January, 2011.

The question was:

Will Australians Get Value for Money for the $55 Million to Be Spent on the PCEHR Wave 2 Projects?

The answers were as follows:

For Sure

- 3 (10%)

Possibly

- 6 (21%)

Neutral / Don't Know

- 1 (3%)

Probably Not

- 8 (28%)

It Will Be A Waste of Money

- 10 (35%)

Votes: 28

Well that is pretty clear cut! Only 10% of respondents are confident we will see value for money on the Wave 2 Projects! I reckon a rethink is needed!

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Here is Another Study That Will Stir Some Debate! Take it From Me it Is Essentially Useless Rubbish - But I Would Say That Wouldn’t I?

The following article appeared in the Health Section of the Saturday Australian on Saturday.

Experts challenge e-health critique: researchers suggests they may not be worth the money

  • Leigh Dayton, Science writers
  • From: The Australian
  • January 22, 2011 12:00AM

DESPITE widespread support for electronic patient records, electronic prescribing and other e-health technologies, a global review by British researchers suggests they may not be worth the money.

Specifically, a team led by physician and epidemiologist Aziz Sheikh with Edinburgh University reported this week in the journal PLoS Medicine that evidence supporting the benefits of e-health technologies is weak and inconsistent, "despite being frequently promoted by policy-makers and techno-enthusiasts".

Worse, they found some evidence that introducing e-health technologies can generate new risks, such as prescribing practitioners becoming over-reliant on the technology, resulting in errors.

This may surprise Australian taxpayers who, in the two years to June 2012 will have spent $467 million on a national e-health record system that does not yet exist.

That excludes another $218m spent during the same period on the National E-health Transition Authority, established in 1995 by the Australian, state and territory governments to develop better ways of electronically collecting and securely exchanging health information.

Sheikh and his colleagues analysed systematic reports, so-called meta-reviews, published from 1997 to 2010, identifying 53 that evaluated the impact of e-health technologies on the quality, cost and safety of healthcare delivery.

They conclude that given the lack of evidence supporting e-health, it's vital that e-health technologies should be rigorously evaluated against a comprehensive set of measures, from design to implementation and adoption.

According to Australian Medical Association vice-president Steve Hambleton, the PLoS paper shows that data being collected "isn't useful" and that evaluation of e-health technologies has "been exceptionally poor to this point".

Enrico Coiera, director of the Centre for Health Informatics at the University of NSW, agrees evidence is patchy and better methods of evaluation are needed. But he disputes the claim by Sheikh and co that there's no good evidence e-health technologies are cost-effective and improve patient outcomes. "They looked at weak literature as opposed to primary sources," says Coiera.

More commentary is found here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/experts-challenge-e-health-critique-researchers-suggests-they-may-not-be-worth-the-money/story-e6frg8y6-1225991983661

There has also been coverage here:

Little Evidence To Support Most E Health Technologies, Such As Electronic Patient Records

19 Jan 2011

Despite the wide endorsement of and support for eHealth technologies, such as electronic patient records and e-prescribing, the scientific basis of its benefits-which are repeatedly made and often uncritically accepted-remains to be firmly established.

Furthermore, even for the eHealth technologies that have proven to be successful, there is little evidence to show that such tools would continue to be successful beyond the contexts in which they were originally developed. These are the key findings of a study by Aziz Sheikh (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland) and colleagues, and published in this week's PLoS Medicine.

In the study, the authors systematically reviewed the published systematic review literature on eHealth technologies and evaluated the impact of these technologies on the quality and safety of health care delivery. The 53 reviews (out of 108), that the authors selected according to their criteria and critically reviewed, provided the main evidence base for assessing the impact of eHealth technologies in three categories: 1) storing, managing, and transmission of data, such as electronic patient records; 2) clinical decision support, such as e-prescribing; and 3) facilitating care from a distance, such as telehealthcare devices.

The authors found that the evidence base in support of eHealth technologies was weak and inconsistent and, importantly, that there is insubstantial evidence to support the cost-effectiveness of these technologies. They also found some evidence that introducing these new technologies may sometimes generate new risks, such as prescribing practitioners becoming over-reliant on clinical decision support for e-prescribing or overestimate its functionality, resulting in decreased practitioner performance.

More here:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/213661.php

The article also got coverage in Time Magazine

Are Electronic Health Systems Cost Effective? Not So Much

By Alice Park Wednesday, January 19, 201

If you've visited the doctor or a hospital recently, you can't help but notice how much of your care depends on some form of electronic information exchange. From the prescription your doctor writes to the chart she consults, medicine is very definitely going digital.

But how effective is all this electronic data capture? Is it making the health care system more efficient? And what about patient care — are e-health technologies improving health outcomes for people who are sick?

Unfortunately, the answer is no, according to research published in PLoS Medicine. And this is despite the billions that governments like the U.S. have poured into such technologies — the Obama administration approved $38 billion to digitize the American health care system.

After analyzing 53 reviews of electronic technologies in health care, researchers led by Dr. Aziz Sheikh at the University of Edinburgh report that there is little or weak evidence to support the massive investment that policy makers have made in electronic systems such as electronic health records and computerizing physician orders and other decision-making. The strongest evidence in support of digitizing medical information came in electronic prescriptions, which showed a small benefit in reducing errors and streamlining ordering.

More here:

http://healthland.time.com/2011/01/19/are-electronic-health-systems-cost-effective-not-so-much/

There is a very interesting comment on the Time Article

Paul Shekelle

As the author of 3 of the reviews summarized in the original PLoS article, I am concerned that readers of this summary, and of the PLoS article, might inadvertantly come away with the impression that the evidence is that electronic health systems don't improve patient care and are not cost effective. I don't think that's what the data support. Rather, I think the published data support that the evidence is mixed, but that in some institutions the electronic health system has been transformative in the way care is delivered, with real and measurable improvements in care. So the question is - how can these results be realized by more health care organizations? At the time of our original 2005 review, there were no examples published outside of the few leaders in the field. By the time of our 2008 update, there were published a small number of successful results at other institutions. This is a fast moving field - the PLoS "review of reviews" isn't going to capture what's happened recently, and will tend to give more emphasis to older studies - in some cases, more than a decade old. Almost nobody today uses the mobile phone or computer that they used 10 years. I don't think data from 10 years ago on the value of electronic health systems is very informative for what's going today, and what is possible tomorrow and next year.

You can read about the commenters biography here:

http://www.rand.org/about/people/s/shekelle_paul_g.html

My reaction to that comment is that Dr. Shekelle MD PhD is right on the money!

That view is further confirmed by downloading the file found here.

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/fetchSingleRepresentation.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.s002

This file lists the papers that were reviewed and what I found impressive was just how many were over a decade old. These papers were written before not only the iPad but also the iPod. Technology and our experience of what works and what doesn’t has advanced quite a way since 1990 when some of the papers seen as contributing to the evidence reported here were written - meaning the work was done in the 1980’s when all sorts of things were yet to come - e.g. the graphical user interface.

The second point is that this paper is a review of reviews. At no point did the authors use primary sources as far as I can tell. This is not the way things sensibly work. Science works by building on previous direct observation and experience - not by reading about it in summaries and then constructing conclusions from summaries papers. Meta, meta analysis is just too silly for words when attempting to draw any conclusions from the findings of studies with ages of up to 20 years and scopes and objectives that are quite different.

Last point is that we know there are examples where e-Health really works - viz Kaiser Permanente in the US, a number of Scandinavian countries and elsewhere as well.

Frankly this paper is just an ill-considered distraction to the pursuit of how to do things better and learn from the mistakes made. Just looking at summary reviews does not get you there in my view.

David.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 21 January, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2011/01/13/Most-hospitals-to-adopt-medical-records/UPI-50001294963588/

Most hospitals to adopt medical records

Published: Jan. 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM

WASHINGTON, Jan. 13 (UPI) -- Eighty-one percent of U.S. hospitals and 41 percent of physicians say they want to use federal funds to use electronic health records, surveys indicate.

The surveys were commissioned by Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and carried out in the course of regular annual surveillance by the American Hospital Association and the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

Dr. David Blumenthal of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology says the survey numbers represent a reversal of the low interest in recent years in electronic medical records adoption -- attributed mainly to the cost and time needed to set up a health technology system. If there are high rates of adoption, about $27 billion in incentive payments would be allocated during a 10-year period, Blumenthal says.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/ehr-market-share-report-meaningful-use-41714-1.html

IDC Pegs EHR Market for 2009-2015

HDM Breaking News, January 10, 2011

The U.S. market for inpatient and outpatient electronic health records software was nearly $1.98 billion in 2009 and will steadily increase to $3.8 billion in 2015, according to a new report from research firm IDC Health Insights, Framingham, Mass.

For purposes of the market survey, the figures cover only software license and maintenance costs for products that meet or exceed meaningful use certification criteria.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/comparative-effectiveness-research-hhs-hitech-41716-1.html

HHS Seeks to Consolidate CER Data

HDM Breaking News, January 11, 2011

The Department of Health and Human Services wants to build a Web-based Comparative Effectiveness Research Inventory database to categorize and catalogue federal and non-federal CER research.

"The CER Inventory will serve as a valuable tool for researchers, providers, patients, policymakers and other users," HHS notes in a notice published Jan. 11 in the Federal Register.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/breach-ehr-medical-records-tucson-hospital-41738-1.html

Records of Shooting Victims Breached

HDM Breaking News, January 13, 2011

University Medical Center in Tucson, Ariz., has announced the firing of three employees for improperly accessing electronic health records of victims of the shooting spree on Jan. 8. A contracted nurse also was fired by the nurse's employer.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110113/NEWS/301139952/

Comments sought on Stage 2 recommendations

By Joseph Conn

Posted: January 13, 2011 - 11:00 am ET

The federal Health Information Technology Policy Committee is seeking public comment on its proposed Stage 2 meaningful-use recommendations for electronic health-record system subsidies under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

A 19-page set of instructions (PDF) for individuals and organizations seeking to submit comments is posted on HHS' website. Included in the instructions are the committee's draft recommendations.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110113/blogs02/301139955

Navigating the IT river

The leadsman's cry, "By the mark, twain," signaled a depth of two fathoms. It meant there was sufficient water running beneath the riverboat, but not so much that it couldn't soon run aground. (It also inspired a famous author's pen name.)

A similar cry, I think, went up Tuesday from healthcare providers, most of whom are early adopters of health information technology systems.

They told members of a federal advisory work group that they and their provider organizations were paddle-wheeling ahead, following the course piloted for them by the federal electronic health-record subsidy program. But most shared their anxieties, too.

I wrote yesterday about what three physician group leaders said. I'll be blogging today about additional physicians' presentations and later about hospitals.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/final-rule-gets-ball-rolling-for-permanent-certification-program.aspx

Friday, January 14, 2011

Final Rule Gets Ball Rolling for Permanent Certification Program

by Kate Ackerman, iHealthBeat Senior Editor

Earlier this month, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT released a final rule to establish the permanent certification program for health IT. The rule did not include any big surprises, something stakeholders say they are pleased about.

"Everybody worries about a big surprise, and there really weren't any," Karen Bell, chair of the Certification Commission for Health IT, said, adding, "Most of the rule is actually very procedural."

-----

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2041900,00.html

The Medical Insider

The Health IT Paradox: Why More Data Doesn't Always Mean Better Care

By Dr. Zachary F. Meisel Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2011

Recently, while I was working an overnight shift in the emergency department, two paramedics wheeled an elderly woman into the busy ER. She was clearly very ill: her eyes were sunken and her mouth was parched, she was slumped over and unable to do much more than moan. The paramedics told me that her family members, who had stayed home (not uncommon!), wanted to make sure we knew that she wasn't usually "like this" and that she had recently been hospitalized at a different facility where many tests and "other stuff" had been done. Unfortunately, all her records were locked up at the other hospital's medical-record room, which was closed in the middle of the night.

We had to start from scratch. We ordered a CAT scan of her brain to look for stroke, put a catheter in her bladder and gave her a chest X-ray to look for infection, and applied a rectal exam to look for bleeding. We may have ended up doing all of this anyway, but having more information about her recent hospitalization would clearly have allowed us to be more efficient and directed in her care. My colleague, another doctor, turned to me and said, "I cannot wait until HIT [industry shorthand for 'health-information technology'] makes this problem goes away."

The "problem," of course, is that medical errors and excess costs increase when health information isn't portable or easily accessible. The conventional wisdom is that electronic medical records, electronic prescriptions and electronic order-entry systems save costs and lives. Since 2009, the federal government has invested over $20 billion into improving HIT. And this month, the federal government will start doling out dollars to doctors' offices and hospitals to encourage them to adopt electronic health records. On its face, this makes absolute sense — who, after all, would argue that more information isn't essential to improved care at lower cost? During the last presidential campaign, both Senators John McCain and Barack Obama called for HIT enhancements as key to fixing health care.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=75900

Medical images may get a role in meaningful use

By Mary Mosquera

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Medical images should have a role in the next stage of meaningful use of electronic health records because of the wide use of radiologic and other images in diagnosis and treatment in healthcare, according to health IT experts.

Dr. David Blumenthal, the national health IT coordinator, gave support to considering the concept at the advisory Health IT Standards Committee meeting Jan. 12, saying “the role of imaging as a meaningful use aspect raises a number of important and interesting questions that I think we will be looking at tackling.”

Clinician access to images, such as timed serial images of portions of the heart, is increasing with the capabilities of electronic and tele-health systems and mobile technologies, said Dr. Robert Pettigrew, director of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering in the National Institutes of Health.

-----

http://geekdoctor.blogspot.com/2011/01/early-experiences-with-hospital.html

Monday, January 10, 2011

Early Experiences with Hospital Certification

As one of the pilot sites for CCHIT's EHR Alternative Certification for Hospitals (EACH), I promised the industry an overview of my experience.

It's going very well. Here's what has happened thus far.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/medication-management-pharmacy-home-41723-1.html

Researchers Call for a 'Pharmacy Home'

HDM Breaking News, January 11, 2011

Establishment of a "pharmacy home" model, similar to a medical home model, could better coordinate medication therapies for chronically ill patients with many prescriptions, according to a study published Jan. 10 in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Provider organizations, according to authors, need to find ways to help patients simplify, synchronize, centralize and organize their medication management. There is a particular need to synchronize medication regimens because "those who make numerous trips to the pharmacy to pick up their medications, or fill prescriptions at different pharmacies, may have difficulty taking their medications as prescribed," the report contends. Report authors also recommend experimenting with programs and technologies to make it easier for patients to better organize their medications.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110114/NEWS/301149952

N.Y. schools to offer health info master's program

By Joseph Conn

Posted: January 14, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

The Rochester (N.Y) Institute of Technology and the University of Rochester have created a two-year, 14-course master's degree program in healthcare informatics, according to a news release from the schools.

Classes will begin in September, with a target initial enrollment of 12 students, according to RIT spokesman John Follaco.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-261367/Preview-HLM-Intelligence-Report-on-EHealth-Systems

Preview: HLM Intelligence Report on E-Health Systems

HealthLeaders Media Staff , January 14, 2011

Healthcare physician leaders and executives mostly support the national initiative to implement electronic health systems, and say they will improve efficiency and quality. But they're also uneasy about the cost, value, and functionality of their own systems, a new HealthLeaders Media Intelligence analysis has found.

A survey of 242 healthcare leaders from hospitals, physician groups, and health plans, detailed in the latest HealthLeaders Media Intelligence Report, E-Health Systems: Opportunities and Obstacles, found that more than 80% of healthcare leaders say the government's push for electronic health systems will improve quality of care industry-wide, and 89% say it will improve quality and safety at their own organizations.

That confidence cools considerably when it comes to the capabilities of their systems. Only about half of hospital and health system leaders are either very satisfied (13%) or somewhat satisfied (41%) with the overall functionalities of their systems. Among physician leaders, the numbers are similar: 16% are strongly satisfied and 44% are somewhat satisfied.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/node/9051/print

EMRs can improve infection control

By Sara Jackson - Contributing Editor

Created Jan 13 2011 - 2:21pm

The dreaded MRSA infection has one enemy your infection control officer might not have thought of: Your hospital's EMR.

In an article in the November issue of the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, researchers report that when staff have access to an EMR, they are more likely to review charts and recommend the infection control measures. The result: MRSA infections at two North Carolina hospitals--East Carolina University and Pitt County Memorial Hospital--fell by 45 percent, and nosocomial infections from clostridium dropped 19 percent. The study reviewed infection rates from January 2005 through December 2009.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/start-educating-staff-security-now/2011-01-13

Start educating staff on security now

January 13, 2011 — 4:03pm ET | By Sara Jackson - Contributing Editor

Training staff on IT security will be a key component for protecting your electronic health record integrity in 2011, according to a new Kroll survey on the top data security trends for 2011. Most important: Privacy awareness training for all employees, from the c-suite down to the janitorial staff, Brian Lapidus, Kroll's COO tells FierceEMR. "It's really a mantra [at Kroll]--privacy awareness training is the cornerstone of any data security program," he says.

Think it's not a top priority? As part of its work for HIMSS Security of Patient Data report, Kroll surveyed healthcare providers who had experienced a breach. Nearly 80 percent said the first task they had to undertake was additional staff security training. And staff training is increasingly being required in the voluntary compliance plans hospitals have to create after a breach, so you know it's something regulators want.

-----

http://healthcareitnews.com/news/interoperability-gives-upmc-leg-meaningful-use

Interoperability gives UPMC a leg up on meaningful use

January 09, 2011 | Patty Enrado, Special Projects Editor

PITTSBURGH – When it comes to exchanging patient data with other healthcare providers under the Stages 2 and 3 meaningful use criteria, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) will be able to create a unified and connected patient record.

UPMC has been offering multiple ways for affiliated physicians - no matter their level of health IT capability - to connect to the integrated delivery network. An important next stage of its affiliated integration, as well as its own internal electronic medical record, is to enable a Continuity of Care Document (CCD) exchange with physicians who move their patients in and out of the system, according to Lisa Khorey, vice president of enterprise systems and data management.

As primary care physicians (PCPs) refer their patients to UPMC employed specialists, the CCD from the physicians' EMR should come with the patient or with the consult, she said. As patients move through UPMC's program - whether it be transplant, cancer care, pediatric emergency department visit, or other area - the CCD should accompany the patient directly to the next provider of care as part of the transition. "That's an important part of connecting the affiliate community for us," Khorey said.

-----

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2011/01/10/the-three-health-technologies-caregivers-want-most/

  • January 10, 2011, 11:50 AM ET

The Three Health Technologies Caregivers Want Most

No less a tech guru than the WSJ’s own Walt Mossberg has challenged the tech world to come up with devices that make it easier for consumers to track and manage their health. Now a new survey looks at what health-management technologies caregivers are most interested in.

The survey, released over the weekend by the National Alliance for Caregiving and UnitedHealthcare at the Consumer Electronics Show’s Silvers Summit, identifies three technologies that seemed to have the most appeal. More than half of the 1,000 people surveyed — all of whom have already used some form of tech to help out with caregiving — said none of the usual barriers, such as cost or privacy worries, would stop them from trying the following (things).

-----

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2011/01/10/bil10110.htm

Physician EMR use passes 50% as incentives outweigh resistance

Age demographics of doctors and financial assistance to help them adopt the technology are responsible for the transition, analysts say.

By Bob Cook, amednews staff. Posted Jan. 10, 2011.

For the first time, a majority of office-based physicians are using an electronic medical records system, according to a survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics.

The survey doesn't explain why EMR use in offices rose to 50.7% in 2010, more than double the adoption rate in 2005. However, peer pressure is apparently moving from fighting EMRs to embracing them. "We're in an electronic age. You either go with it, or you're in the Dark Ages," said Pat Willis, RN, chief nursing officer for seven-physician Big Sandy Healthcare, in eastern Kentucky, which installed its first EMR in July.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=75894

ONC will share proven EHR methods of extension centers

By Mary Mosquera

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT is developing an online, interactive dashboard that will continuously track the performance of regional health IT extension centers and allow for the timely sharing of lessons learned.

A first-look “static” version of that progress summary should be available by the end of January, according to Mat Kendall, director of ONC’s Office of Provider Adoption and Support.

The 62 centers, spread across the US, offer a variety of services, including education, vendor selection and project management, to help health providers establish and become meaningful users of electronic health records (EHRs) and to help them redesign their workflow.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110112/NEWS/301129953/

Docs talk challenges of 'meaningful use'

By Joseph Conn

Posted: January 12, 2011 - 11:15 am ET

Physicians from group practices with extensive experience adopting and using electronic health-record systems testified before a federally chartered advisory group Tuesday.

The elite EHR users—who self-defined their groups in terms of EHR implementation to be in the upper 25% of all EHR users nationwide—said that meeting the Stage 1 meaningful-use criteria to receive federal EHR incentive payments presents multiple challenges to their practices.

They also warned federal rulemakers against setting the bar too high when second and third stages of the meaningful-use requirements are set for 2013 and 2015.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2011/physician-compare-site-could-be-game-changer-but-challenges-remain.aspx

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Physician Compare Site Could Be 'Game Changer,' but Challenges Remain

On Dec. 30, 2010, the Obama administration launched Physician Compare, a website that will eventually include data gleaned from the Medicare meaningful use incentive program and that has the potential to dramatically change the way Americans choose their doctors.

Imagine comparison shopping for a doctor based on patient reviews, a set of easily comprehended measures of quality and other criteria. It's one of the Holy Grails of a truly patient-centered system!

The health reform law required HHS to launch the site by Jan 1. For now, it's mainly an updated directory of doctors and other health care providers nationwide -- 932,000 in all -- who accept Medicare beneficiaries. It's searchable by ZIP code, city, state and medical specialty. Doctors who are participating in Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System have a mention of that in their profile. Those participating in Medicare's electronic prescribing initiative will have that added to their profiles this year.

The long-term plan is to add information to the site over time, with the reform law pushing the government to post the first patient assessments and measures of clinical care quality by 2015.

-----

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/01/12/unfreezing-the-health-it-market/

Unfreezing The Health IT Market

January 12th, 2011

by David Kibbe and Brian Klepper

Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein recently described the Obama administration’s consistent efforts to improve troubled private markets:

Isolate the eight key economic decisions of the Obama presidency: The intervention in the financial sector, the intervention in the auto sector, the intervention in the housing sector, the stimulus package, the health-care bill, financial regulation, and the tax deal…Where there was a market that they considered functional-but-frozen, they worked to unfreeze it.

Intervention into health IT should be added to this list. Nowhere has this administration’s activities to unfreeze private markets been more dramatic than in the health IT products and services sector, especially for electronic health records (EHRs).

When the President was elected, this market was dominated by the vendor-controlled Certification Commission for Health IT (CCHIT). The entry rules were intentionally complex and expensive, safeguarded by an interlocking system of standards organizations and both open and clandestine industry alliances that defended against innovation and new entrants.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/issues/19_1/moving-target-mobile-devices-41628-1.html

Moving Target

Elizabeth Gardner
Health Data Management Magazine, 01/01/2011

A Colorado physician loses his iPhone in the mountains, and the health system he’s affiliated with erases all of its contents remotely so that no one can illicitly access patient data.

A California hospital uses dedicated iPhones to let nurses receive voice messages, text messages and alarms, and they no longer have to cram their pockets with multiple pagers.

A Texas health system gives Blackberries to its transport staff to improve their ability to get radiology equipment where it needs to be. They save hours of time daily, and wear and tear on both equipment and employees.

A New York City hospital has all its administrators bring iPads to leadership meetings and doesn’t allow paper.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/issues/19_1/the-long-shadow-of-meaningful-use-41636-1.html

The Long Shadow of Meaningful Use

Gary Baldwin

Health Data Management Magazine, 01/01/2011

Raise the issue of what the "hot technology" in 2011 will be, and Keith Fraidenburg gives a quick answer: "anything associated with meaningful use." Fraidenburg serves as vice president of education and communications for the College of Health Information Management Executives, a member organization of 1,400 hospital CIOs. Its fall forum in 2010, which focused on the federal EHR incentive program, drew nearly 400 of them-an organizational record. In 2011, CHIME members will continue to focus on the key technologies that will enable organizations to apply for meaningful use incentive money (see related story, page 48), including order entry and personal health records, Fraidenburg says. "We will also see more investment in infrastructure."

If anything, 2011 may be remembered as the year of industry focus when it comes to health I.T. At hospitals across the country, CIOs will be leading the charge on upgrading infrastructure and systems, revising documentation and workflow requirements, cajoling vendor cooperation, keeping tabs on system certification, and expanding their efforts to loop in physicians via integrated-or at least highly interfaced-ambulatory EHR ventures. The allure of billions in federal incentive dollars (plus the long-term Medicare payment cuts for providers not in compliance) has clarified these near-term goals for many a hospital. Med schools too are hopping aboard the I.T. bandwagon (see sidebar, page 53).

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110111/NEWS/301119997/

Cleveland Clinic launches personalized-care center

By Joseph Conn

Posted: January 11, 2011 - 11:45 am ET

The Cleveland Clinic has launched a new Center for Personalized Healthcare "for the identification, analysis, adoption and integration of select new services and technologies that will allow for personalized care of patients," according to a news release from the clinic.

Dr. Kathryn Teng, a primary-care physician, has been selected to direct the new center.

-----

http://www.nhbr.com/businessnewsstatenews/904911-257/n.h.-e-health-framework-approved.html

N.H. e-health framework approved

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

New Hampshire has taken one more step toward efforts to connect health-care providers in cyberspace.

The state Department of Health and Human Services has received approval from the federal government of its Health Information Exchange Strategic and Operational Plans for the New Hampshire Health Information Exchange Planning and Implementation Project, a massive information technology project creating an electronic network to exchange health-care information among providers.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110110/NEWS/301109996/

High court to hear prescription-drug data case

By Paul Barr

Posted: January 10, 2011 - 10:00 am ET

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case in which a Vermont law seeking to restrict the use of prescription drug data in the marketing of pharmaceuticals to physicians was overturned on appeal.

At issue is whether the Vermont law restricting such use violates the First Amendment, an argument brought forth by the original plaintiffs in the suit and the winners on appeal in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The Supreme Court decision would settle conflicting decisions occurring in the lower courts regarding similar laws in Maine and New Hampshire.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110110/NEWS/110119997/

ONC forms PCAST report work group

By Joseph Conn

Posted: January 10, 2011 - 11:30 am ET

A new federal work group will meet this week to discuss the recommendations in the report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

HHS' Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology announced Friday the formation of the PCAST Report work group under the purview of its Health IT Policy and Standards committees. The group is scheduled to meet Friday, Jan. 14, from 2 to 4 p.m. ET.

The new group's tasks are "to synthesize and analyze the public comments and input into the PCAST Report relative to implications on current and future ONC work," according to a statement on the ONC's website.

-----

Motion Computing Debuts Rugged Tablet For Healthcare

The CL900 Windows 7 tablet is geared to clinicians who need a durable tablet to read patient X-rays and charts -- and want to keep the device sanitary.

By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, InformationWeek

Jan. 5, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229000057

Motion Computing is extending its offering of tablet PCs for healthcare with a new rugged, ultra-light “reader” model.

The new CL900 is suited for clinicians such as respiratory therapists in acute care settings and home health care workers out in the field who often “need a reader more than a full function tablet,” to view patient charts and images. It offers an alternative to devices designed for heavy data entry or to access multiple enterprise applications at the same time, said Mike Stinson, VP of marketing at Motion.

Priced at about $1,000 and weighing about 2 lbs., the CL900 is a thin client tablet running Windows 7 and is powered by Intel’s Atom processor. Options for healthcare use include two cameras that can be used for video conferencing and documentation of care, such as wound care, said Stinson.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=75862

CMS counts 4,000 providers initially registering for EHR incentives

By Mary Mosquera

Friday, January 07, 2011

In the first four days since its launch, about 4,000 healthcare providers initiated registration for the electronic health record incentive program, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The agency provided the preliminary count as of Jan. 6.

“We expect that number will continue to increase daily,” said CMS spokesman Joseph Kuchler.

Providers access the CMS registration portal, which became operational Jan. 3, to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record (EHR) incentive program.

Eligible professionals who demonstrate meaningful use have the opportunity to receive incentive payments of up to$44,000 from Medicare, or $63,750 from Medicaid. Under both Medicare and Medicaid, eligible hospitals may receive millions of dollars for implementing and meaningfully using certified EHR technology.

-----

Enjoy!

David.