tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post3450962456357064001..comments2024-03-28T17:49:03.998+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: The Scale Of The Miss On NEHRS / PCEHR Delivery Becomes Clearer Every Day. No Wonder We Got A ‘Soft Launch’ - It Wasn’t Ready.Dr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-63730899259362035712012-07-13T13:55:42.911+10:002012-07-13T13:55:42.911+10:00The Medicare PKI solution is not even suitable to ...The Medicare PKI solution is not even suitable to fulfil all the needs of PKI for the PCEHR. It will not allow those vendors who act as Contracted Service Providers to obtain certificates to access the PCEHR.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-16350375495288733992012-07-12T15:54:52.843+10:002012-07-12T15:54:52.843+10:00To 7/12/2012 01:40:00 PM If that is true then the...To 7/12/2012 01:40:00 PM If that is true then the Minister needs to call it out and employ a group of people the Australian public can trust and who are not too afraid to ask the right questions and who are capable of drilling down to get the right answers then go from there and get everything back on track and fully transparent before it all snowballs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-90857553578203712392012-07-12T13:40:22.475+10:002012-07-12T13:40:22.475+10:00NO - it is not because the Minister said it would ...NO - it is not because the Minister said it would - it is BECAUSE THE MINISTER WAS TOLD BY HER DEPARTMENTAL BUREAUCRATS, from the Secretary down including NEHTA, that she could be absolutely confident she could say it would. She was blindsided, snowballed and conned and those responsible knew that at the time and knowingly deceived her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-49933015697096413722012-07-12T12:08:15.463+10:002012-07-12T12:08:15.463+10:00well because the minister said it would.well because the minister said it would.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-42014978579209883182012-07-12T11:08:25.998+10:002012-07-12T11:08:25.998+10:00Why is the PCEHR being launched at all? FULL STOP....Why is the PCEHR being launched at all? FULL STOP. END OF STORY.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-81173313576196537772012-07-12T10:35:06.996+10:002012-07-12T10:35:06.996+10:00Well, if the Medicare PKI is not suitable for the ...Well, if the Medicare PKI is not suitable for the job, why is the PCEHR being launched at all?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-15613573237161855272012-07-12T10:13:28.850+10:002012-07-12T10:13:28.850+10:00The facts, for what they are worth. The Medicare ...The facts, for what they are worth. The Medicare PKI solution is not suitable to fulfil all the needs of the health sector for NASH. Medicare are providing a temporary infill which will allow the use of its PKI with the PCEHR only. Health sector needs outside of the PCEHR cannot be met without substantial investment in a new solution by Medicare, at the very least, hence why IBM or others are Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-63770359155829975192012-07-12T09:58:36.758+10:002012-07-12T09:58:36.758+10:007/12/2012 12:04:00 and AM 7/12/2012 08:34:00 AM ha...7/12/2012 12:04:00 and AM 7/12/2012 08:34:00 AM have highlighted another example of NEHTA's total incompetence.<br /><br />I woke last night in a sweat dreaming of the 20,000 pages of documentation which NEHTA has assembled. Then I thought of Accenture, Oracle and Orion and wondered if they would ever bother to read all that stuff. I concluded not, because they have their own products to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-68203789939427983202012-07-12T08:34:34.109+10:002012-07-12T08:34:34.109+10:00A very good question. Medicare originally bid for ...A very good question. Medicare originally bid for the tender to develop the NASH, building on its exiisting platform and using IBM as its internal systems partner. But no, NEHTA selected IBM as a standalone provider. I think Medicare would have every right to feel miffed over the way they've been treated in this proectAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-7814820863120443332012-07-12T00:04:26.514+10:002012-07-12T00:04:26.514+10:00I don't understand. If Medicare are now contr...I don't understand. If Medicare are now contracted to deliver the NASH requirement, and can whoop it up in a hurry, then why do we need the IBM NASH at all, and have we paid for it twice now? What is the difference between the Medicare version of the NASH and the promised IBM NASH?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com