tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post543472077071880239..comments2024-03-18T10:18:32.702+11:00Comments on Australian Health Information Technology: We Look To Be Seeing Very Little Progress In E-Health Standards In Australia. Why Is That I Wonder?Dr David G More MB PhDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06902724829795199526noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-77827364163470355262013-03-14T07:05:45.990+11:002013-03-14T07:05:45.990+11:00Standards and the specifications NeHTA produce are...Standards and the specifications NeHTA produce are no longer relevant. We have our in house teams and designs, these will become the standards for the simple reason that you will not be able to participate in the e-health game if you can't interact with our systems. Government incentives will ensure we are all in agreementAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-143189939171859522013-03-13T11:53:21.095+11:002013-03-13T11:53:21.095+11:00With MMR Global sniffing around over patent infrin...With MMR Global sniffing around over patent infringements it is timely to ask who owns the IP to the NPDR? <br /><br />Is it NEHTA, eRx, the Government or the Guild?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-89681948114721394472013-03-13T10:15:54.124+11:002013-03-13T10:15:54.124+11:00That suggests the default will be the eRx develope...That suggests the default will be the eRx developed Barwon Medview NPDR being readied for national rollout - a turbo charged pre election ehealth booster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-74551766904498878112013-03-13T10:09:15.883+11:002013-03-13T10:09:15.883+11:00Eric Browne said - As far as I can gather, this mo...Eric Browne said - As far as I can gather, this model is also totally outside the scope of the eTP specifications developed by NEHTA.<br /><br />This should not be too surprising. It us clear from the PulseIT article - National medications repository to roll out in May - that NEHTA is deferring to DOHA.<br /><br />Where does DOHA stand? Perhaps NEHTAs specs are superfluous. <br /><br />Perhaps Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-53800013345005994972013-03-13T09:41:08.635+11:002013-03-13T09:41:08.635+11:00"since the "consolidation" is occur..."since the "consolidation" is occurring outside the PCEHR proper"<br /><br />No. NPDR consolidation is done by the NIO using the pcEHR data store. <br /><br />"this model is also totally outside the scope of the eTP specifications developed by NEHTA"<br /><br />The question of harmonisation between the NPDR and ETP specifications is being examined. Knoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-25327004843520890562013-03-12T23:42:49.460+11:002013-03-12T23:42:49.460+11:00Anonymous of 12 March 2013 10:18 says "I don...Anonymous of 12 March 2013 10:18 says "I don't think we will ever see a consolidated view in the PCEHR". Well this is already being slated for medications history with the Pharmacy Guild's National Prescribing and Dispensing Repository - see http://wp.erx.com.au/eprescribing/pcehr_npdr/ for a sample screen shot. <br />With this model, DoHA can presumably wash its hands of Eric Brownehttp://www.healthbase.infonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23447705.post-79784977836715666002013-03-12T22:18:53.668+11:002013-03-12T22:18:53.668+11:00There are some issues around the Consolidated View...There are some issues around the Consolidated View of the PCEHR. From the concept of operations it is supposed to be derived from the data in other clinical documents submitted, and to include key data such as current medications and allergies. The 'author' responsible for the consolidated view is who? The System Operator? With data in clinical documents not being semantically Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com