Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, April 27, 2012

A Serious Commentator Makes Some Smart Points About Responsibility and Consultation In E-Health System Delivery.


Joseph Conn - reporter and blogger at Modern Medicine in the US - who has been reporting on all this for decades has got a bee in his bonnet. I think he is spot on.
The first blog is here:

IT Everything

A witness to history in healthcare information technology.
By Joseph Conn

A bad blueprint for behavioral-health records

Earlier this month, the Colorado Regional Health Information Organization released what its authors must hope will become a blueprint for sharing behavioral-health records via health information exchanges.
I hope not.
The 34-page report, "Supporting Integration of Behavioral Healthcare through Health Information Exchange" (PDF), is part of CORHIO's Behavioral Health Information Exchange Project.
The project erroneously supposed that patient consent laws are "barriers" to exchange. In fact, these laws are the opposite. They're vital foundations to sharing accurate patient records.
For its project, CORHIO rounded up the usual "stakeholders" at six focus groups around the state. That’s how it's done—wrapping "consensus" around a policy—in this case, to eliminate patients' rights to control their behavioral health records.
The feds have quietly supported multiple efforts to wipe out state consent laws, but they want to do it without the clamor of seeking pre-emptive federal legislation. I'll talk about that tomorrow. In the CORHIO case, it meant ending Coloradans' control over the movement of their mental-health records.
Colorado once had a stringent privacy law in its Mental Health Practice Act. Like similar patient privacy laws in multiple states, it barred Colorado mental-health professionals from disclosing "any confidential communications made by the client, or advice given to the client" without patient consent.
More here:
Here is the second bite at the same issue.

More on the folly of removing patient consent protections

Previously, I blogged about the Colorado Regional Health Information Organization's blueprint on how patients' behavioral-health records might be linked to other medical records in health information exchanges.
The word "barrier" in the CORHIO report in referencing patient consent laws sounded familiar. A scan of our archives reminded my why.
In 2002, HHS rewrote the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rule, eliminating patient consent as a requirement for most healthcare records disclosures.
In 2005, HHS awarded a $17 million contract to RTI International and the National Governors Association with the aim, in part, to provide ammunition for then-Rep. Nancy Johnson (R-Conn.), whose health information technology bill called for federal pre-emption of state privacy laws in favor of one uniform federal law.
Johnson's bill enjoyed broad health IT industry support. I was in Washington in mid-2006 for a Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society-sponsored IT summit that dispatched more than 400 IT users to lobby their legislators for it. The bill included a HIPAA amendment to pre-empt state consent laws.
But pre-emption was stripped out by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas). Johnson's bill, and her political career, soon died.
Undeterred, RTI and the NGA pushed on with dozens of state committees, including one in Colorado. Each was presented with an RTI-delivered framework that presumed state patient consent laws were "barriers" to health information exchange and that tilted toward removing—not accommodating—them.
To be sure, improving health information exchange is a worthy goal, and the CORHIO folks, citing the opinions of its focus group members, listed the many advantages of adding behavioral health records to HIEs. The same benefits are so often cited by proponents of records exchange that they don't need repeating here.
Full blog here:
There are two important points here:
First - and less important to a degree are the comments on dodgy consultation in e-Health. Boy have we seen a lot of that here.
Second - and most important is this paragraph.
“Providing safe, high-quality, high-value healthcare services requires patient consent. For patients who have conditions that could stigmatize them, cost them a relationship or a job or prevent them from obtaining affordable health insurance if their medical records were not kept private, the right of consent is akin to the right of social and economic survival. Without security and control, patients will lie or withhold information even more than they do now, which is often.”
All I can say is never was a truer word written.  I hope the proponents of the NEHRS realise this is just as true in Australia as it is in the US.
Thanks Joseph!  Well put indeed.
David.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

I Wonder How This Fits With the Health Identifier Service? Are We Duplicating Things Again?

The following appeared a few days ago.

Roxon flags online identity checks

  • by: Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • April 20, 2012 2:40PM
THE Gillard government is looking at introducing a real-time identity verification system, Attorney-General Nicola Roxon told the Commonwealth Lawyers Association regional conference in Sydney.
"Document verification may not sound particularly sexy, but it is now a critical tool to control the validity of online transactions," she said this morning.
"Just think of how your personal and financial security is reliant on secure transfer and validation of information from our banking and finance sectors, Australia's large superannuation sector and maritime and aviation security.
"And, in contrast, how verification could support the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing and other organised criminal activity."
The federal police have recently warned that fraudsters are targeting superannuation funds held by older Australians, using stolen identity information to gain access to personal accounts.
Meanwhile, the current parliamentary Joint committee inquiry into Cybersafety for Seniors was also told shopping site eBay and payments provider PayPal wanted the government to introduce a strong online identity verification regime.
Ms Roxon said the government "is looking closely at ways we can deliver a simple, affordable and real-time service" providing national coverage.
"Reducing the costs of client identification will allow business to invest more in their products and marketing, while reducing their exposure to fraud," she said.
More here:
What on earth is going on here? We now have a proposal to develop a proper Identity Verification System - as opposed to the rather less powerful IHI service - and somehow we don’t recognise that such a service would really help all sorts of e-Health initiatives.
All I can say is I hope Health and Attorney General’s are talking in the background to see how the ongoing costs of each of these services can be minimised and better identity service provided.
Seems like the old right and left hand not actually knowing what the other is doing again. Surely Ms Roxon must have noticed!
David.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Somehow A Good Idea Is Getting To Be Really Messy. Policy Seems To Be Off Track Again.

The following appeared over the weekend.

Plibersek defends script alert system

  • by: Karen Dearne, IT writer
  • From: The Australian
  • April 21, 2012 12:00AM
HEALTH Minister Tanya Plibersek has dismissed a Victorian coroner's concerns that a proposed $5 million electronic system to alert doctors and pharmacists to prescription-shoppers is flawed.
This is despite the fact that e-prescription software and exchange services offered by independent providers such as MediSecure and Pharmacy Guild-owned eRX can provide instant reporting.
Earlier this year, Plibersek promised to establish a national electronic recording and reporting of controlled drugs system to combat abuse of prescription medications.
Her department selected a system originally developed by the Tasmanian government as the state's Drugs and Poisons Information System (DAPIS), together with a web-based application, DAPIS Online Remote Access (DORA), to be available nationwide from July.
As reported in Weekend Health last week, Victorian coroner John Olle has described a tragic rise in deaths among painkiller addicts as a public health issue. He also called on the state's Health Department to introduce a real-time monitoring and alert system within 12 months.
But this week Plibersek's spokesman told Weekend Health that the DORA system would meet Olle's specifications.
"The decision to use the software was taken after a worldwide expression of interest was advertised through AusTender," he said.
"The Tasmanian system provided the best scalable solution to deliver real-time reporting as soon as possible, and the software is the best platform for building a nationally consistent system."
.....
Weekend Health understands DORA does not interface with doctors' desktop prescribing systems; nor does it provide alerts about patients who have obtained S8 scripts from other doctors.
More here:
This was a follow up of this report:

Electronic alert to end abuse

THE suicide of James - from an overdose of prescription morphine and diazepam he obtained during daily runs to various GPs and pharmacies - proved one tragic death too many for Victorian coroner John Olle.
Unusually, Olle has used his powers to recommend the state introduce a real-time prescription monitoring and alert system within 12 months to reduce the deaths and harm caused by such doctor-hopping or prescription-shopping by vulnerable patients.
At present, state and territory governments rely on monthly submissions of paper-based records of controlled (Schedule 8) drugs prescribed by doctors and dispensed by pharmacists. A move from manual to electronic recording, and then real-time reporting, will give providers the information needed to make clinically appropriate prescribing decisions.
But some critics fear a national alert system being developed by the Gillard government may not deliver the desired outcomes.
Meanwhile, courts must deal with cases like that of James, a 24-year-old Essendon man suffering from depression, anxiety and insomnia. He obtained scripts for S8 drugs from 19 doctors and picked up the medications from 32 pharmacies in the three years before his death in 2009.
"James developed an addiction to prescription painkillers he was unable to satisfy or overcome," Olle said in his inquest findings, delivered last February.
"His former partner recalls a normal day for James would involve prescription-shopping for several hours ...
"James would then attend work, return home and consume large quantities of medication during the late evening.
"James's family and friends were aware of his addiction, which resulted in several episodes of violent behaviour, relationship breakdown and job loss."
Olle found James actively tried to minimise the harm, storing his drugs overnight in a cabinet that was locked by a trusted friend, and attending residential drug and alcohol programs.
James was found dead in bed after his father asked police to conduct a welfare check. The young man had left notes indicating his decision to end his life and expressing love for his former partner and family members.
Olle found the issue is a public health problem, not a matter for law enforcement. The problem is such patients conceal the fact they doctor-hop and drug-shop.
"The medical practitioners whom James consulted were denied an opportunity to exercise clinical judgment with the benefit of the complete picture," he said.
Lots more here:
The issue attempted to be addressed here is how to make a prescriber aware when an individual has been receiving more than a reasonable amount of potentially addictive or dangerous medication provided by different prescribers (who are unaware of what their colleagues have prescribed).
The problem is conceptually very easy to address - all you need is a prescription database that can be searched by individual patient. With the internet and modern data-base tools there are no serious technical barriers - the devil is of course in the detail of addressing all the issues of consent, integration with work flow and prescribing and dispensing workstations, security of information, maintenance of privacy and so it goes on.
It is interesting that this problem is faced all over the world.
On Friday last week we even had it discussed in the US.
Friday, April 20, 2012

Ky. Lawmakers Consider Expanding Access to Rx Drug Tracking System

The Kentucky Senate is gearing up to vote on a bill (HB 1) that aims to crack down on prescription painkiller misuse by restricting ownership of pain clinics and increasing access to the state's prescription drug tracking database, the Wall Street Journal reports.
About the Database
Kentucky's database includes information about prescribers, recipients and dispensers of certain prescription drugs. The state's Cabinet for Health and Family Services and Board of Medical Licensure currently oversee the database.
Law enforcement officials seeking to obtain information from the database must submit a request to the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and prove that the information request is part of an active investigation.
About the Bill
Under the bill, oversight of the prescription tracking database would shift to the state attorney general's office. The change would provide the AG's office and local prosecutors with better access to the prescription drug tracking system, but police officers still would need to submit requests to obtain information from the database.
The proposed legislation also would require physicians to consult the database before prescribing certain painkillers.
More here:
From the articles above we see the Federal Government seems to want to extend a Tasmanian system which operates only in the hospital sector. The pros and cons of all this was discussed here:
The 13 comments are pretty interesting and revealing.
Reading the two articles above there is clearly concerns this - on the cheap - approach has a range of flaws.
An alternative being tried as one of the Wave 2 projects is Medview from Fred IT - a major provider of pharmacy dispensing software. You can read all about this here:
What is interesting about this project - being conducted in the area around Geelong - is that it uses just one of the two private prescription exchanges and on the web site there is hardly a mention of either NEHTA (except for the funny little e-Health logo) or the PCEHR (Just a 467 Million Govt. Program). In the background the Pharmacy Guild - who are a major sponsor of the eRX exchange - are strongly supporting this program for their own reasons.
As a tool to manage doctor shopping it has one rather large flaw. You have to consent to your data being uploaded and what seeker after pills is going to be silly enough to do that?
It also is claimed by the other prescription exchange they can provide a useful data base to do similar things.
Clearly what is needed is a strategic, standardised approach that builds on what is being done with both prescription exchanges, GP and Pharmacy Desktop Software and the relevant messaging providers to have something useful emerge in a co-ordinated and practical way.
It is not hard to do - but again there needs to be quality leadership and governance put in place to make the vision a working reality. Fragmented approaches too often fail.
David.
p.s. Since this was prepared more coverage interesting has appeared here:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/delayed-choice-for-prescription-alert-platform/story-e6frgakx-1226336572114

Delayed choice for prescription alert platform

HEALTH Minister Tanya Plibersek's $5 million plan to crack-down on prescription painkiller abuse, which was announced in February, was originally funded under the fifth community pharmacy agreement with the Pharmacy Guild in 2010. 
-----
The Brownian Motion around all this is just amazing and silly!

D.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

This Seems To Be A Very Interesting And Innovative Approach. I Wonder Where It Might Lead.

The following summary report appeared a little while ago

SMART platform 'promising' for EHRs

By mdhirsch
Created Mar 21 2012 - 10:17pm
The Substitutable Medical Applications, Reusable Technologies (SMART) platform appears to be a "promising approach" to improve electronic health records now that phase one of the project has been completed, according to its developers.
The creators report [1] this week in the Journal of American Medical Informatics Association that unlike current proprietary EHR systems, the SMART platform operates as a standard base platform to which users can add or subtract modular third-party applications, similar to the methodology used by iPhone or Android.
The researchers noted that in just 14 months, they have developed "containers"--such as EHRs and health information exchanges and charter applications--to showcase the system's capability.
"With the cost of switching kept low, the platform enables a physician using an EHR, a Chief Information Officer running a hospital IT infrastructure, or a patient using a personally controlled health record (PCHR) to readily discard an underperforming app and install a better one. Competition on quality, cost, and usability is enabled, and the pace of innovation increases," the developers said.
More here:
Here is the direct link to the full free paper.
The abstract is as follows:

The SMART Platform: early experience enabling substitutable applications for electronic health records

  1. Kenneth D Mandl1,2,
  2. Joshua C Mandel1,3,
  3. Shawn N Murphy4,5,
  4. Elmer Victor Bernstam6,
  5. Rachel L Ramoni1,2,
  6. David A Kreda7,
  7. J Michael McCoy8,
  8. Ben Adida9,
  9. Isaac S Kohane1,2
  • Received 3 October 2011
  • Accepted 12 February 2012
  • Published Online First 17 March 2012

Abstract

Objective The Substitutable Medical Applications, Reusable Technologies (SMART) Platforms project seeks to develop a health information technology platform with substitutable applications (apps) constructed around core services. The authors believe this is a promising approach to driving down healthcare costs, supporting standards evolution, accommodating differences in care workflow, fostering competition in the market, and accelerating innovation.
Materials and methods The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, through the Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Program, funds the project. The SMART team has focused on enabling the property of substitutability through an app programming interface leveraging web standards, presenting predictable data payloads, and abstracting away many details of enterprise health information technology systems. Containers—health information technology systems, such as electronic health records (EHR), personally controlled health records, and health information exchanges that use the SMART app programming interface or a portion of it—marshal data sources and present data simply, reliably, and consistently to apps.
Results The SMART team has completed the first phase of the project (a) defining an app programming interface, (b) developing containers, and (c) producing a set of charter apps that showcase the system capabilities. A focal point of this phase was the SMART Apps Challenge, publicized by the White House, using http://www.challenge.gov website, and generating 15 app submissions with diverse functionality.
Conclusion Key strategic decisions must be made about the most effective market for further disseminating SMART: existing market-leading EHR vendors, new entrants into the EHR market, or other stakeholders such as health information exchanges.
-----
Here is the link for the abstract.
You can see the data model (so far) from this link:
The idea of developing iPad and Android like apps for a Health Information Source is an interesting one. If such an approach can generate one thousandth of the innovation we have seen in those apps in the Health Information space all our Christmases may have come at once!
Here is the core site to keep an eye on.
http://wiki.chip.org/smart-project/index.php/Developers_Documentation:_SMART_Data_Model
David.

Monday, April 23, 2012

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 23rd April, 2012.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

The MJA Articles on the safety of the NEHRS (PCEHR) and mobile health tools and apps were the big news of the week. Both articles were covered on Monday here:
and here:
Other than that the news flow has focussed on the continuing countdown to the launch of a patient registration scheme for some future NEHRS.
The next couple of weeks will be dominated by Budget Speculation. The Budget is released on May 8 and it will be very interesting to see just what is announced in terms of base NEHRS funding and in practitioner involvement incentives. It is only about 2 weeks away and I am sure this Budget will be pivotal to the future - see recent blog
At a general level the Government announcements on Aged Care for the future where also pretty important. This link provides discussion and background.
-----

Doctor shopper scheme praised

17 April, 2012 Sarah Colyer
A new opioid script-tracking website is making it easier for GPs to identify patients who genuinely need emergency painkillers, according to early trials of the system.
In a new push to tackle doctor-shoppers, the Federal Government recently committed to expanding the technology from Tasmania to the rest of Australia from July this year.
-----

Plibersek defends script alert system

  • by: Karen Dearne, IT writer
  • From: The Australian
  • April 21, 2012 12:00AM
HEALTH Minister Tanya Plibersek has dismissed a Victorian coroner's concerns that a proposed $5 million electronic system to alert doctors and pharmacists to prescription-shoppers is flawed.
This is despite the fact that e-prescription software and exchange services offered by independent providers such as MediSecure and Pharmacy Guild-owned eRX can provide instant reporting.
Earlier this year, Plibersek promised to establish a national electronic recording and reporting of controlled drugs system to combat abuse of prescription medications.
-----

GPs want more money for e-health

  • by: Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • April 20, 2012 7:01AM
THE peak GPs' body has restated its funding position on the Gillard government’s personally controlled e-health records system, following confusion over whether doctors will be paid to establish and maintain electronic health summaries for their patients.
"General practice is in an ideal position to be at the forefront of e-health and implementation of the PCEHR," the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners says in a statement released this week.
"Funded and protected time for data cleansing and data quality improvement will ensure that the patient record is accurate and current.
"This will require an ongoing business investment by general practice, not just a one-off payment.
"With more than 125 million GP consultations taking place annually in Australia, and 83 per cent of the population consulting a GP at least once a year, the flow-on to the whole health sector will be substantial."
-----

‘False optimism’ over e-health funding

The Federal Health Minister has been accused of creating “false optimism” by declaring GPs could claim MBS items to fund their role in creating e-health summaries for patients.
Last month, both the RACGP and the AGPN gave an enthusiastic welcome to a speech by Tanya Plibersek where she “confirmed” that level B, C and D items could be used by doctors “creating or adding to a shared health summary, which involves taking a medical history as part of a consultation”.
It emerged later, however, that doctors were being asked to absorb the costs of setting up the personally controlled e-health record summaries, with the government offering no new money to fund the additional workload.
-----

Roxon flags online identity checks

  • by: Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • April 20, 2012 2:40PM
THE Gillard government is looking at introducing a real-time identity verification system, Attorney-General Nicola Roxon told the Commonwealth Lawyers Association regional conference in Sydney.
"Document verification may not sound particularly sexy, but it is now a critical tool to control the validity of online transactions," she said this morning.
"Just think of how your personal and financial security is reliant on secure transfer and validation of information from our banking and finance sectors, Australia's large superannuation sector and maritime and aviation security.
-----

Amplilatwatja health records go online

Posted April 17, 2012 13:43:36
The health centre at the remote central Australian community of Amplilatwatja has become the first in Australia to adopt a new e-health system.
The system will place patient health records online so that health professionals are able to access information remotely.
-----

Govt should fund e-health: Psychologists add their voice

19th Apr 2012
PSYCHOLOGISTS have joined GPs and physiotherapists in calling on the government to fund the administration of e-health records, estimating the cost of setting up the necessary software alone at $3000 per provider.
Australian Psychological Society (APS) executive manager of professional practice David Stokes said allied health professionals, including psychologists, needed assistance to help ensure the viability of the personally controlled health care record (PECHR) system.
Mr Stokes, who was also a NEHTA clinical lead representing allied health, said the whole initiative “is underpinned by the idea that relevant health service providers can access the system to upload reports or letters at their patient’s request and review relevant information to enhance care”.
-----

The connective tissue of modern health

17 April, 2012
David Ramli
As patients enter Melbourne’s Western Hospital, it’s probably impossible for them to spot the electronic heart that helps them be treated.
They are greeted by a triage nurse who judges the severity of injuries and decides how soon they’ll see a doctor. As the process progresses, they’re cared for by medicos who ask questions about allergies and monitor conditions, moving between scores of beds, as they have for decades.
But just below the surface of all these interactions sits up to $10 million of electronic health technology designed to reduce errors and boost the chances of patients surviving.
Western Health’s executive director of information and communications technology, Jason Whakaari, said the upgrade started as a way to cut down on paper records and cope with rapidly rising patient numbers.
------

NSW Health eyes cloud in data centre reform

Recruitment points to long-awaited action.

NSW Government plans to consolidate its 130-odd data centres appear to have borne fruit, with several developments suggesting its largest Departments - Health and Education - have agreed to participate.
NSW Health has advertised for a director of data centre reform to lead the consolidatation of three existing data centres into two, "enabling their use of ... cloud technologies while maintaining service availability".
The NSW Government started scoping a whole-of-government data centre reform project in 2009, based a review of data centre capacity a year earlier.
-----

Time is key to specialist buy-in to PCEHR, not money

By Professor Martin Culwick
In general, anaesthetists are early adopters of technology and we work under a considerable time pressure. This is partly because in hospitals, patients are admitted on the same day of surgery and we have between five and fifteen minutes to assess them.
How we assess them can be the difference between life and death.
Obviously that assessment depends on the information, so the quality of the information is a very important safety factor. This is why we are very interested in the PCEHR.
-----

Privacy concerns over mobile apps

DOCTORS using clinical software on their smart phones or tablet computers may be inadvertently putting patient confidentiality at risk, according to a privacy expert.
Dr Juanita Fernando (PhD), part of the mobile health research group at Monash University, told MJA InSight she had been contacted by several patients who had suffered “direct dire consequences” as a result of privacy breaches after doctors used clinical apps on their mobile devices.
She cited the case of a doctor who had updated and uploaded a patient record at home using a clinical app. This was then cached by a metasearch engine, effectively publishing the data in the public domain.
-----

Apps pose medicolegal risks

17 April, 2012 Sophie Cousins
Clinical software being used by doctors on their smartphones and tablets could be putting patient privacy at risk and threatens the reliability of medical information, a leading academic warns.
In an article in the Medical Journal Australia online, Dr Juanita Fernando (PhD) of the Australian Privacy Foundation warns of the medicolegal risks of doctors using apps, amid the proliferation of programs such as iStethoscope and MedCalc.
Some applications alter the protective settings on the user's smartphone or tablet "threatening the reliability and so security, of medical information read on these," she said.
-----

Doctors' health apps pose a security risk

THERE's an urgent need for government regulation of clinical software being used by doctors on their smartphones and tablets, according to Juanita Fernando, from Monash University's Mobile Health Research Group.
Doctors using apps like iStethoscope, Flipboard and MedCalc on a wide range of personal mobile devices face liability and security risks not addressed in current legislation, Dr Fernando warns in a Medical Journal of Australia article published today.
"Risks include transmission of user log-ons and address-book details, message interception and activity tracking," she says.
-----

Safety warning on "unregulated and unmonitored" e-health

16th Apr 2012
Experts have called for an independent monitor of e-health clinical safety and governance to mitigate the patient harm they say will inevitably result from use of the personally controlled e-health record system (PCEHR).
Centre for Health Informatics director Professor Enrico Coiera told MO while the PCEHR system rollout was getting headlines, e-health also included “every GP's desktop, every pharmacy and hospital that has software installed which is currently uncertified”.
Professor Coiera, Flinders University Professor Michael Kidd and NEHTA national clinical lead Dr Mukesh Haikerwal have used an article in the Medical Journal of Australia to underscore the seriousness of the issue, warning “e-health in Australia is unregulated and unmonitored”.
-----

Dangers of proposed e-health system: Expert warning

Published on April 17, 2012 at 6:26 PM
By Dr Ananya Mandal, MD
Experts warn that patient safety can be in jeopardy under the proposed Australian electronic health records system. The electronic health record scheme, due to start on July 1, is yet to provide safeguards to prevent mistakes with doctors software.
Three experts including Chief clinical adviser to the e-health transition agency Mukesh Haikerwal warn the lack of a national clinical safety system to deal with computer glitches, and electronic devices means that “it is not yet possible to make any definitive statement about whether the personally controlled electronic health record is safe or not.”
The new system has been subject to growing criticism on concerns of privacy and security attributable to the unreliable performance of the National e-Health Transition Agency NEHTA, responsible for the e-Health rollout. Complaints have come from industry, “ranging from accusations of ineffective oversight and failure of administrators to acknowledge design flaws, to warnings that the system will not succeed because its implementation has been ill-considered and rushed.” This comes from an analysis by the Parliamentary Library.
-----

E-health safety protocols off to a shaky start

Broadcast:
Monday 16 April 2012 6:20PM (view full episode)
Electronic health records have been billed as a way to cut through red tape and improve the level of care that we all receive.
But a group of experts have warned that arrangements need to be made to ensure that our very personal records don't become compromised in any way.
-----

Concerns raised about e-health records

Updated April 18, 2012 09:36:00
Concern has been raised in the Medical Journal about the move toward electronic health records in Australia.
-----

Experts warn against E Health

Updated: 08:55, Tuesday April 17, 2012

Patient safety under the proposed electronic health records system cannot be guaranteed, warn experts.
The electronic health record scheme, due to start on July 1, is yet to provide safeguards to prevent mistakes with doctors software.
Three experts including Chief clinical adviser to the e-health transition agency Mukesh Haikerwal warn the lack of a national clinical safety system to deal with computer glitches, and electronic devices means that 'it is not yet possible to make any definitive statement about whether the personally controlled electronic health record is safe or not.'
The E Health scheme has been subject to growing criticism on concerns of privacy and security attributable to the unreliable performance of the National e-Health Transition Agency, responsible for the e-Health rollout.
------

Experts warn about e-health safety

E-HEALTH experts have called for safety arrangements to minimise harm caused by health IT initiatives like the Gillard government's personally controlled e-health record system.
While e-health systems can foster safer care, an editorial published in today's Medical Journal of Australia warns that problems in design or operation can also lead to patient harm or death.
"The handful of local studies on e-health safety all point to clear evidence of past harms and future risks," says Enrico Coiera, director of the University of NSW's Centre for Health Informatics, along with co-authors executive dean of Flinders University's Faculty of Health Sciences Michael Kidd and National E-Health Transition Authority clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal.
-----

Concern for patient safety with e-records

Mark Metherell
April 16, 2012 - 12:07AM
PATIENT safety under the proposed electronic health records system cannot be guaranteed less than three months before it is scheduled to start.
Safeguards to prevent and correct snafus with doctors' software, such as medication mistakes, have yet to be provided for in the national e-health scheme beginning on July 1.
The warning has come from three experts, including Mukesh Haikerwal, chief clinical adviser to the e-health transition agency.
-----

E-health policing plan pulled

13 April, 2012 Sarah Colyer  
The Department of Health and Ageing has been forced to pull a "shocking" draft plan giving bureaucrats powers to search general practices and scrutinise their records.
Under the draft proposals GPs wanting to take part in the personally controlled electronic health records (PCEHR) scheme being rolled out from July 1 would have had to sign a contract allowing the department search and seizure powers under the proposal.
A leaked draft of the contract stated that the system operator - currently the department of health - "may at reasonable times on giving reasonable notice to you: access your premises; access your information technology systems; require the provision by you of records and information;… inspect and copy documentation;… interview and require a meeting with any of your employees."
-----

Aussies Consider Date of Birth on Guard IDs ‘Excessive Personal Information’

By Carlton Purvis
04/16/2012
The overhaul of identification cards for security personnel in New South Wales in December came after complaints that information on current IDs violated privacy statutes, according to recently released documents.
Early last year, a person only identified as a member of the New South Wales security industry made a complaint to the NSW Office of the Privacy Commissioner about the requirement for security personnel to wear and display license cards while on duty. The complainant expressed concerns about physical and financial safety because of the amount of information listed on the cards and said ID cards showing names and birthdate violated NSW privacy laws, according to recently released investigation report by the privacy commissioner.
-----

NBN blowout is inevitable, warns analyst

  • by: Annabel Hepworth, Mitchell Bingemann
  • From: The Australian
  • April 19, 2012 12:00AM
THE furore over the National Broadband Network has intensified amid fresh claims that the $36 billion project is 15 months behind schedule because of "fundamental" shortcomings in Labor's policy and that cost blowouts are inevitable.
Telecommunications analyst Kevin Morgan argues that, while delays in the multi-billion-dollar deal between the Gillard government, NBN Co and Telstra have been blamed for missed targets
on the NBN rollout, the main reason has been "fundamental shortcomings and miscalculations" in the policy behind the NBN.
Mr Morgan, who served on Keating government communications minister Kim Beazley's committee on telecom reform on behalf of the ACTU, says these miscalculations included a $43bn "guesstimate" of the cost to build the NBN in 2009 that had led to "unreasonable" expectations about the price that should be paid to contractors.
-----

Scientist beams up a real 'Star Trek' tricorder

April 16, 2012 - 8:26AM
A scientific measurement device based on Star Trek's "tricorder" handheld, used by characters in the series as early as 1966 for data sensing, analysis and recording
Starships, warp speed, transporters, phasers. Think Star Trek technology is only the stuff of fiction? Think again.
Dr. Peter Jansen, a PhD graduate of the Cognitive Science Laboratory at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, has developed a scientific measurement device based on the tricorders used by Captain Kirk, Spock, Dr. McCoy and other space adventurers on the classic TV series that has spawned numerous spin-offs in more than 45 years.
"Star Trek inspired me to be a scientist" said Jansen, who has been formally working on his tricorder prototypes since 2007, but toying with the idea of making a functioning device since he was "a kid in high school."
-----

Space mining start-up set for launch in US

Published 11:21 AM, 21 Apr 2012
AAP
A corporate start-up evidently devoted to mining asteroids for metals is to make its public debut on Tuesday in the US northwest city of Seattle.
X Prize founder Peter Diamandis and a former NASA astronaut are slated to unveil Planetary Resources, which boasts an impressive list of backers including Google co-founder Larry Page and famed film-maker James Cameron.
-----
Enjoy!
David.