This blog is totally independent, unpaid and has only three major objectives.
The first is to inform readers of news and happenings in the e-Health domain, both here in Australia and world-wide.
The second is to provide commentary on e-Health in Australia and to foster improvement where I can.
The third is to encourage discussion of the matters raised in the blog so hopefully readers can get a balanced view of what is really happening and what successes are being achieved.
The question was:
Would You Prefer NEHTA Chose Practical Quicker Implementable Simplicity Over Trying For Slower Solution Perfection?
The answers were as follows:
Absolutely
- 23 (76%)
Probably
- 1 (3%)
Possibly
- 2 (6%)
I Would Rather They Take Time
- 3 (10%)
Absolutely No Way
1 (3%)
Well that is seems pretty clear with 76% thinking we need to do more implementing and less perfecting!
Votes : 30
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.
Well, hopefully that 76% aren't the ones complaining about things like pseudonyms and the keep it initial simple approach that it seems Nehta had taken.
ReplyDelete