This blog is totally independent, unpaid and has only three major objectives.
The first is to inform readers of news and happenings in the e-Health domain, both here in Australia and world-wide.
The second is to provide commentary on e-Health in Australia and to foster improvement where I can.
The third is to encourage discussion of the matters raised in the blog so hopefully readers can get a balanced view of what is really happening and what successes are being achieved.
The question was:
Should There Be A Fundamental Review of The PCEHR Proposal Before It Goes Any Further?
The answers were as follows:
For Sure
- 48 (81%)
Probably
- 4 (6%)
Probably Not
- 2 (3%)
Not A Chance
- 5 (8%)
The clearest poll yet. There really has to be a review of this monster before it gets out of hand!
Votes : 59
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.
Maybe it's just me, but isn't it undergoing a review?
ReplyDeleteOh, you mean, like a fundamental review? And, ah, what does that mean exactly?
A review at a Strategic, Tactical, Clinical, Health Outcomes, Benefits and Costs level!
ReplyDeleteThat would be a start!
David.