Sunday, April 21, 2019

This Is The Big News In Digital Health For This Week Globally I Reckon. Important Stuff!

This appeared a day or so ago.

Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement

Draft 2 of the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA), released on April 19, 2019, outlines a common set of principles, terms, and conditions to support the development of a Common Agreement that would help enable nationwide exchange of electronic health information (EHI) across disparate health information networks (HINs). The TEFCA is designed to scale EHI exchange nationwide and help ensure that HINs, health care providers, health plans, individuals, and many more stakeholders have secure access to their electronic health information when and where it is needed.
In January 2018, ONC released the first draft of the Trusted Exchange Framework (TEF Draft 1) for public comment. We thank all those who commented on TEF Draft 1 for their input. ONC reviewed all of the public comments on the TEF Draft 1 and has released an updated draft package for comment. Specifically, we are asking the public to comment on the following three complementary documents:
  • The Trusted Exchange Framework (TEF) Draft 2 — A common set of principles that are designed to facilitate trust between HINs and by which all HINs should abide in order to enable widespread data exchange. These principles are the foundational concepts that guide the development of the Common Agreement.
  • The Minimum Required Terms and Conditions (MRTCs) Draft 2 — These are the mandatory terms and conditions that Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs) voluntarily agree to follow. The Common Agreement would include the MRTCs, as well as additional required terms and conditions developed by an industry-based Recognized Coordinating Entity (RCE).
  • The QHIN Technical Framework (QTF) Draft 1 — This document is incorporated by reference in the Common Agreement. It details the technical and functional components for exchange among QHINs.
ONC is concurrently issuing a Notice of Funding Opportunity to select a Recognized Coordinating Entity (RCE) to develop, update, implement, and maintain the Common Agreement and the QTF. Entities interested in applying for the RCE Cooperative Agreement must submit their application by June 17, 2019. Read more about the funding opportunity and learn how to apply.
We encourage stakeholders to submit comments on Appendices 1, 2, and 3 of the TEFCA. Comments are due on June 17, 2019. 

Download the Relevant Documents

Public Information
Historical Documents
Here is the link:
The following blog post explains just what is involved here:

Moving Beyond Closed Networks – An Update on Trusted Exchange of Health Information

Don Rucker M.D. | April 19, 2019
In the 1990s, many Americans interacted with the Internet through America Online. While this platform was revolutionary, providing users with e-mail services and access to content, it was also a closed network. Their users were restricted from accessing applications, content, and services available outside of AOL’s approved content providers. In the healthcare landscape, we still have a similar dynamic today. Both national networks and local or regional health information exchanges provide valuable services to their users; however, these networks are often not connected and offer varied services and use cases. To address this issue, Congress included a provision within the 21st Century Cures Act to advance a Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) to improve data sharing between health information networks.
Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement Update
Today the Department of Health and Human Services took another step towards advancing the access, exchange, and use of health information by issuing three documents for public comment that would support network-to-network exchange of health information nationally. Collectively, these documents seek to provide a single “on-ramp” to nationwide connectivity, while advancing a landscape where electronic health information securely follows the patient and can be queried, retrieved, and delivered when and where it is needed. These documents include:
  • Second drafts of the (1) Trusted Exchange Framework (TEF) and the (2) Minimum Required Terms and Conditions (MRTCs), which were previously in one document; and
  • A first draft of the Qualified Health Information Network (QHIN) Technical Framework, which describes technical and functional requirements to implement the Common Agreement and enable health information networks to connect to each other.
The challenge before us – for ONC and the broader community – is to work as efficiently as we can to advance towards nationwide interoperability, which will inject competition and transparency into healthcare to empower patients and drive down costs.
Collectively, these documents will form the basis of a single Common Agreement that will create baseline technical and legal requirements for sharing electronic health information on a nationwide scale. Through the Common Agreement, electronic health information sharing can occur across disparate health information networks to the benefit of improved care for the patient.
I am also pleased to announce that we are issuing a Notice of Funding Opportunity for a Recognized Coordinating Entity (RCE) to develop, update, implement, and maintain the Common Agreement and the QHIN Technical Framework.
We are incredibly grateful for the public’s interest and feedback on Draft 1 of TEF. We received more than 200 comments on the first draft, the majority of which were supportive of its goals and direction. Our team carefully reviewed all of the comments to ensure we understood stakeholder concerns and suggestions. Additionally, the Health Information Technology Advisory Committee provided a set of 26 recommendations. Nationwide interoperability is not a simple undertaking, and something as expansive as a final TEFCA requires thoughtful consideration of the issues and challenges. For example, a successful “network of networks” requires that each network that facilitates connectivity agrees to the same mix of technical standards, policies, and legal conditions. By releasing today’s draft for a second round of public comment, we are working to get it right.
The following are some common themes we heard from the first round of public comment along with key updates.
Wide support for a Recognized Coordinating Entity (RCE)
In the first draft of the TEF, we indicated our intention to use a funding announcement to work with an outside organization to operationalize a final Common Agreement. ONC will work with the selected RCE to incorporate the TEF into a single Common Agreement to which QHINs voluntarily agree to adhere. While there were questions and varying opinions regarding the distribution of work and authority between the ONC and an RCE, the majority of stakeholders supported our plan to select an RCE. The Cooperative Agreement for the RCE will be a four-year award and will include requirements for the RCE to demonstrate a commitment to transparent, fair, and nondiscriminatory data exchange through organizational policies and governing structures.
Specification of Standards
We included a number of privacy, security, and technical standards in the first draft of the TEF. Many commenters indicated that the Common Agreement would not be the best place to specify all of the standards, which may need to be updated more frequently than a legal agreement. Commenters suggested specifying standards through implementation guides, rather than in the Common Agreement itself. Thus in the second draft, we included most standards requirements in the draft QHIN Technical Framework, which will be incorporated into the Common Agreement by reference, and with appropriate notice and compliance provisions for implementation of any updated technical requirements.
Qualified Health Information Networks Definition Broadened
In the first draft of the TEF, we defined a new type of organization – the QHIN. Our goals are to help advance a fair and equitable market and support successful QHINs that can support scalable interoperability. In response to comments that the definition of QHIN was too restrictive, we expanded the definition to allow for more types of stakeholders to apply. We also updated the application process to allow for a provisional period where QHINs will onboard to the Common Agreement and undergo testing and surveillance to ensure they are in compliance before actively exchanging data on the network.
Inclusion of Push Transactions
We received a number of requests from commenters asking that we include a push-based exchange modality in the Common Agreement. Commenters noted that push transactions play a vital role in supporting transitions of care and public health use cases and would be necessary to fully support required public health reporting. Therefore, ONC has included QHIN Message Delivery, which supports instances in which a QHIN sends electronic health information to one or more QHINs for delivery. We believe the value of push transactions is significant to deliver critical information about patient care.
Next Steps in Implementing TEFCA
We sincerely appreciate the thoughtful feedback we received during the first round of public comment. The challenge before us – for ONC and the broader community – is to work as efficiently as we can to advance towards nationwide interoperability, which will inject competition and transparency into healthcare to empower patients and drive down costs. We are committed to advancing a TEFCA that helps achieve these goals. Please review the new documents and provide your comments by June 17, 2019.
Here is the link:
All I can say is that – over a few years – the ambition is that there will exist a national capability to share personal health information with the patient and additionally anyone who has a legitimate need for it.
These three paragraphs from the blog tell you the nature of the game that is in play.
“The challenge before us – for ONC and the broader community – is to work as efficiently as we can to advance towards nationwide interoperability, which will inject competition and transparency into healthcare to empower patients and drive down costs.
Collectively, these documents will form the basis of a single Common Agreement that will create baseline technical and legal requirements for sharing electronic health information on a nationwide scale. Through the Common Agreement, electronic health information sharing can occur across disparate health information networks to the benefit of improved care for the patient.
I am also pleased to announce that we are issuing a Notice of Funding Opportunity for a Recognized Coordinating Entity (RCE) to develop, update, implement, and maintain the Common Agreement and the QHIN Technical Framework.”
Seems to me this is the way we should be moving and not down the path we are presently on with the myHR.
What do others think?
David.

7 comments:

  1. Dr Ian ColcloughApril 21, 2019 2:40 PM

    "What do others think?"

    I think the bureaucracy with its entrenched policies and procedures is not equipped to deal with this level of complexity and and problem solving."

    I am sure plenty will quickly disagree with me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It will take a long time for the effects of the sunk cost fallacy to wear off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think as a nation we sit back and wait for the byproducts to hit our market. We were once look towards for innovative leadership in interconnected healthcare I guess we got caught in the headlights. Thanks To the Howard and then the Kelsey years we are little more than a bottom level nation. Odd as we have under visuals that really are driving changes to healthcare. Instead of investing and building capability around these human assets we built big beautiful walls to keep them out.

    All the current efforts can do is follow the ONC lead and perhaps try and copy it, but anchor our investments in a central database of mostly redundant, obsolete and trivial data. I could be wrong and perhaps this year Tim can demonstrate how a patient MYHR can be injected directly into clinical workflows supported by data-driven decision making technology

    ReplyDelete
  4. “We wasted all our money on this platform that no one knows how to use,” a source said.

    No, not My Health Record.

    "The Liberal Party has abandoned a $1.2 million data harvesting system amid a botched rollout and fears that sensitive voter information was at risk as the government deals with an internal rift over software once touted as its electoral 'silver bullet'."

    Coincidence? I think not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you're only interested in sharing fragments of health data ie health summaries, transfer of care etc via documents or messages, then these principles are probably a good step forward.

    If you're interested in exchanging the breadth of health data, as and when it is clinically required, then we have a long way to go! Without standardisation of the clinical content we will forever be transforming and patching between clinical systems, providers and organisations. Establishment of standard messages, documents and APIs is only the basic starting point to solving the problems we face with broader health information interoperability.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bernard Robertson-DunnApril 22, 2019 5:41 PM

    If the government were to develop and implement a clinically useful health record system then they would be putting themselves in competition with all those software vendors out there currently working in the same market.

    Does anyone really think this is a realistic goal? For a free market government? Even for a Labor government?

    The ADHA's strategy of making myhr record useful is on a path to confrontation and requires existing software vendors to contribute to a solution that would cut their own throats.

    IMHO, it makes no political, medical, or business sense for a health provider to have two systems (local and national) - the data entry overheads alone make it unsustainable. Not that the ADHA could deliver such a system anyway.

    Tim could do worse than find himself a copy of a 1988 book A Bunch of Amateurs - The Tragedy of Government And Administration in Australian by JWC Cumes.

    It explains two things -

    1. why Australian Governments are so incompetent and

    2. that they have a habit of selecting people just like themselves (Chapter 6 Institutional Narcissism).

    ReplyDelete
  7. It may just end up that through this mad investment in GovHR that Australia skips a technology evolutionary step and emerges in a few years ready to embrace a new evolutionary cycle. Having not invested in today technology we are positioned to move quickly to adopt tomorrows.

    If people are wise they should do just enough to pay homage to the GovHR and these better connections dribble and not get there products and services so wedded that extraction is high-risk and high-cost.

    The Department will take back the GovHR and Tim will not see the year out. You can rest assured once he departs the illusion presented to the public will quickly evaporate and ADHA will collapse in on itself.

    ReplyDelete