This appeared last week:
eHealth NSW nears completion of electronic medical records system
Aimee Chanthadavong
16 August, 2019
eHealth NSW has announced that by the second
half of next year, all New South Wales public hospitals will have access to
electronic medical records (EMR), as part of the agency's wider effort to make
the state's health system more citizen-centric.
During his keynote address at an Australian
Information Industry Association event on Thursday, eHealth NSW CIO and CEO
Zoran Bolevich outlined the EMR system is already live at 177 public hospitals
across the state.
"It is important for us to start looking
at how we can link disparate electronic medical records databases so we can
have a more continuous flow of patient information, and that's what we're
trying to do with this piece of work," Bolevich said.
"We're trying to create a more
consistent patient and clinician experience, especially for junior doctors and
nurses who travel around the state and work in different types of hospitals …
so there is a consistent look and feel everywhere."
With
an EMR system in place, Bolevich said there was now a foundation for eHealth
NSW to accelerate its data analytics journey where data models can be standardised
and local innovations can be seamlessly rolled out across the state.
The
EMR system will be used to support the eHealth's strategy to develop a Single
Digital Patient Record (SDPR) that will be designed to give a holistic,
state-wide view of a patient's healthcare information.
Earlier
this month, eHealth issued a Request for Information to seek input from
industry, solutions providers, and healthcare professionals to support the
development of the SDPR initiative. An industry briefing on this is scheduled
to take place next week.
A
similar system known as My Health Record was designed by the federal
government, although it was not particularly well-received by some patients. Over 2.5 million Australians opted out of the government's
online medical file, after their records were automatically created for them.
Getting to know the patients
In
addition, Bolevich announced phase one of the agency's patient reported measure
project will go live in a few weeks' time, which will enable clinicians to invite
patients to provide feedback through a survey portal, which will then be
available to clinicians to inform patients' preferred process of care.
"Like
most other systems in the western world, NSW Health is reframing and rethinking
our value proposition," Bolevich said.
"Health
systems have been very good traditionally at counting inputs and outputs of
volume, but we haven't been particularly successful and or systematic in the
way we collect outcome information so that we can truly understand the value the
health system provides to community, and the impact we're making on people's
health and wellbeing.
"We've
focused a lot of the clinical outcome defined by the health system, but the
idea here is the staff will systematically collect feedback on patient
experience and outcomes of care in terms defined by patients."
Bolevich
said eventually the patient experience outcome surveys will progressively be
integrated with the EMR and GP systems to deliver a holistic process of
care.
Lots more interesting material here:
What I reckon I missing is the hard evaluation of both
clinical, clinician and financial measures of impact.
Have we seen improved clinical outcomes, fewer clinical and
medication errors, less clinician stress and has there been at least a reasonable
return on the investment been made for the NSW public.
I have had a look at the last year or two of press releases
and while a lot of systems have been installed there is not much discussion of
the evidence for the difference they are making.
If there are some useful reports I would love to read them, or is all this just based on blind faith that more systems equals better clinical and financial outcomes?
David.
1 comment:
more data does not mean better data. all it might do is slow doctors down and confuse them. An advantage of data in different contexts is that it is sorted into meaningful lumps, probably according to discipline/specialiity.
Post a Comment