Sunday, June 20, 2021

I Find It Really Sad To Find Propaganda Masquerading As An Academic Paper.

This appeared a few days ago:

A national system of online access by patients to personal health information in Australia is proving valuable

There was a significant piece of international healthcare news this year in April that you may have missed. It was such a momentous development—empowering people and providing them with access to their own health information—that it could only have been eclipsed by a global pandemic. Transparency took a leap forward for citizens of the United States on 5 April 2021 as the 21st Century Cures Act quietly came into effect, which mandated in its rule on “Interoperability, Information Blocking, and ONC Health IT Certification” that healthcare providers give patients access to all the health information in their electronic medical records, without charge and without delay. [1] 

This landmark change reflects international advances in transparency of health information. Many countries have now embedded laws that ensure people have the right to access their own health data. Personal electronic health records, which support this endeavour, are used increasingly. [2] An Australian example of this is the My Health Record system, a national online repository of health information freely available for Australian citizens who wish to access their own health data. [3] Commencing in 2012, all securely connected healthcare providers in hospital and community settings, both public and private, can view and contribute information to the system relating to people for whom they are providing care. It is both visible to and personally controlled by the individual healthcare recipient, meaning they can see everything in there, add personal health information, or remove things they would prefer not to have in there themselves. They also have the right to opt out of the system altogether with a phone call or online process, at which point their record is completely removed from the system. If they change their minds at a later date, they can re-open their record. Around 90% of Australians have a My Health Record, containing information such as discharge summaries from hospitals, prescriptions from pharmacies, pathology and imaging results, and health summaries from general practitioners. 

My Health Record also provides people with access to their own information in national health data repositories including the Australian Immunisation Register, which is recording all covid-19 immunisations being undertaken in the country. [4] The covid-19 pandemic has seen very large increases in virtual care provision in Australia including telehealth, and this has spurred an increase in patients and clinicians viewing My Health Record. [5] The My Health Record system also played an important role in recent years supporting people and communities who needed to be urgently evacuated from their homes as a result of bush fires and floods, and so were cut off from their regular healthcare providers. It allowed the healthcare professionals they saw in emergency evacuation centres to access information about the medications they were on, ensuring continuity of care with vital medication supplies. [6]

Change like this can be confronting for healthcare providers. It potentially affects the traditional power balance between clinicians and their patients, whose access to their own health information has not been common. It can sometimes be viewed by healthcare providers as disruptive and even potentially dangerous in some way. However the international evidence suggests that the opposite is true.

People who can access their own health information have been shown to have greater compliance with treatment regimens and a better understanding of their conditions. [7,8] It has also been suggested that with improved access to information, patients could be playing a greater role in detecting and preventing medical errors, such as the systemic problem in hospital and ambulatory care settings of missed test result follow up by clinicians, an issue that results in sadly avoidable harm for too many people. [9,10] 

In our information rich age, digital tools that allow people to see their own health data offer the greatest hope for keeping us safe and informed as we encounter our complex health systems. We are now entering an age where this has become a legislated right in many countries around the world. Our health systems need to embrace innovation and technology that offer this in a meaningful way, and recognise that access to information for people has an important role to play in improving safety and quality in healthcare.

Meredith Makeham, Professor and Associate Dean, Community and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney. 

Competing interests: none declared.

Many rather dated references and the full paper are found here:

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/18/a-national-system-of-online-access-by-patients-to-personal-health-information-in-australia-is-proving-valuable/

Sadly the author seems to think none of us know what is going on around the world. It is utterly deceptive to any way compare the access to their actual live medical records being mandated in the US to having access to the incomplete, partial document pile that is the #myHealthRecord – the difference in what is available, and its value, is as chalk and cheese!

Additionally comparing the impacts of the OpenNotes initiative in the US with having a #myHealthRecord is pure poppycock! The information is just not comparable.

I challenge the reader read carefully and consider the unreferenced assertions in the blog and decide how many are actually evidence based. Not many I think.

I am not sure my PhD supervisor at the University of Sydney way back when would have let me put out such deceptive information – I doubt it.

Seems standards have slipped! I find it all rather sad.

David.

10 comments:

  1. Hubris and/or fake news. She should know better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She does know better but she lacks the integrity to admit it.

      Delete
  2. Transparency took a leap forward for citizens of the United States on 5 April 2021 as the 21st Century Cures Act quietly came into effect, which mandated in its rule on “Interoperability, Information Blocking, and ONC Health IT Certification” that healthcare providers give patients access to all the health information in their electronic medical records, without charge and without delay. [1]

    ...

    An Australian example of this is the My Health Record system, a national online repository of health information freely available for Australian citizens who wish to access their own health data.

    My Health Record is not an "example of this". The claim is a downright lie.

    My Health Record dos not "give patients access to all the health information in their electronic medical records"

    Meredith Makeham should be ashamed of herself. The ADHA should issue a correction, as should the Department of Health.

    Will that happen? The likelihood is between zero and stuff all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have to meet that quota of published papers. Meriden was the ADHA CMO, maybe she has an interest to declare. The underlying problem is that papers start getting referenced and opinion and wishful thinking replace fact. As the day everyone is entitled to their own opinions but not their own facts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, papers like this get published and the dishonest claims get believed by those who know no better. This greatly reinforces what 6:24 PM said. The author's lack of integrity is reflective of today's readiness to unquestionally accept false news as 'truth'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From the article here:
    https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/18/a-national-system-of-online-access-by-patients-to-personal-health-information-in-australia-is-proving-valuable/

    Meredith Makeham, Professor and Associate Dean, Community and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney.

    Competing interests: none declared.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Doesn't reflect well on Academia. Undermines UNSW reputation and oversight of publications. Medical School academics need to take action to redress this appalling lack of honesty and blatant degradation of standards. They have the power to do something about this but do they have the courage, strength of their convictions and a will to preserve and protect their academic reputation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Executive Dean and Head of Faculty is well placed to rectify this.

      Delete
  7. ... correction ... Univ of
    Sydney not UNSW.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not convinced integrity is a principle or pillar of Universities these days. So long as she brings in grant money and her political contacts pay dividends she is encouraged to say whatever.

    ReplyDelete