This media release appeared last week:
Trust in government hits all time low
9 December 2019
I've been studying elections for 40 years, and never have I seen such poor returns for public trust in and satisfaction with democratic institutions | Professor Ian McAllister
Trust in government has reached its lowest level on record, with just one-in-four Australians saying they had confidence in their political leaders and institutions, according to a major study of the 2019 Federal Election.
The latest Australian Election Study, conducted by The Australian National University (ANU), also found Australians' satisfaction with democracy is at its lowest since the constitutional crisis of the 1970s.
Just 59 per cent of Australians are satisfied with how democracy is working - down 27 percentage points from the record high of 86 per cent in 2007. The historic low sits at 56 per cent in 1979.
"I've been studying elections for 40 years, and never have I seen such poor returns for public trust in and satisfaction with democratic institutions," lead researcher Professor McAllister said.
"There is widespread public concern about how our democracy is underperforming."
Professor McAllister added that the findings were a clear warning the nation's politicians needed to do better in their efforts to represent and win the confidence of everyday Australians.
"Trust in our politicians has been on a steady downward trend since 2007, when it sat at 43 per cent," he said.
"In one of the most worrying findings from our study, a little over one-in-10 Australians, 12 per cent, believe the government is run for 'all the people'.
"In contrast more than half, 56 per cent, say government is run for a 'few big interests'.
"This is a wakeup call.
"With faith in democracy taking major hits all over the globe, winning back the people's trust and satisfaction would appear to be one of the most pressing and urgent challenges facing our political leaders and institutions."
Analysing every major Federal poll since 1987, the latest Australian Election Study also helps explain the shock 2019 result.
The study found the Coalition had a strong advantage when it came to voters' perceptions on who could manage the economy, while Labor had the advantage on environmental issues.
"Voters swung to the Coalition based on the economy, tax and leadership. Voters swung to Labor on the environment," said Dr Jill Sheppard who worked on this year's study.
"What the study shows is that a key concern for voters was the economy. And this is what tipped the balance in favour of the Coalition."
Another factor explaining the 2019 election result is that fewer Australians align with the major political parties.
"The study shows a clear rise in support for minor parties among voters, while 21 per cent of Australians don't align with any party at all," Dr Sheppard said.
When it came to captains who make the calls, the study found Scott Morrison was the most popular political leader since Kevin Rudd in 2007. He scored 5.1 on a popularity scale of zero to 10.
In contrast, Bill Shorten was the least popular leader of any major political party since 1990.
"Leaders have always played a major role in shaping voters' choices and the 2019 election was no exception," said Dr Sarah Cameron from the University of Sydney and study co-lead author.
"But, the role of leadership in the 2019 election was different from other elections in two respects. First, Bill Shorten's historically low popularity undoubtedly disadvantaged Labor.
"Second, the Liberals switch from Malcolm Turnbull to Scott Morrison was the fourth time a sitting prime minister had been replaced outside an election since 2010. A majority of voters, 74 per cent, disapproved of this.
"Voters are getting weary of constant changes of prime minister."
The 2019 Australian Election Study surveyed a nationally representative sample of more than 2,100 voters. Other key findings from the 2019 include:
- A majority of voters (66 per cent) cast their ballots based on policy issues.
- The most important policy issues for voters were management of the economy (24 per cent), health (22 per cent) and environmental issues (21 per cent).
- Voters preferred the Coalition's policies on management of the economy, taxation, and immigration.
- Voters preferred Labor's policies on education, health, and the environment.
- More voters indicated that global warming or the environment was the most important issue in casting their vote than at any other point on record.
- Men were much more likely to vote for the Coalition than women (men: 48 per cent; women: 38 per cent).
- Women were more likely to vote for the Greens (men: 9 per cent; women: 15 per cent).
- Gender differences in voting have changed over time. In the 1990s men were slightly more likely to vote Labor than women. In recent elections women have become more likely to vote Labor.
- There is a growing divide between younger and older voters. The 2019 election represented the lowest Liberal party vote on record for those under 35 (23 per cent), and the highest ever vote for the Greens (28 per cent).
- Working class voters are much more likely to vote Labor than middle class voters (working class: 41 per cent; middle class: 29 per cent). Long-term trends show an erosion of Labor's working class base.
- Asset ownership, including property and shares, was strongly associated with a higher vote for the Coalition.
- For the first time, following the election on the Internet surpassed all other media sources, including television.
- Following the 2019 election campaign, more voters saw a major difference between the parties than at any time since 1993.
- The trend towards a more tolerant, inclusive society continued, particularly on moral issues. Support for abortion rights reached its highest level on record (Obtain readily: 73 per cent; In special circumstances: 23 per cent).
- If a referendum were held to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution, 80 per cent responded that they would support this change.
- Support for Australia becoming a Republic has reached its lowest level on record -49 per cent.
- Since Donald Trump's 2016 election win, fewer Australians trust the United States to come to Australia's defence.
Here is the link:
https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/trust-in-government-hits-all-time-low
In a similar vein we have increasing concerns regarding misuse of data and QR codes.
NSW moves to fortify check-in app data privacy, prevent police access
By Justin Hendry on Nov 12, 2021 7:00AM
Introduces Covid-19 information privacy bill.
The NSW government has moved to strengthen the privacy protections behind QR code check-in data that prevent law enforcement access by enshrining the safeguards in legislation.
The Service NSW (One-stop Access to Government Services) Amendment (COVID-19 Information Privacy) Bill was introduced to parliament on Wednesday and has already passed the lower house.
It follows similar efforts by the Victorian government to further restrict the use of such data by police through its Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill last month.
Concerns around law enforcement access to check-in data have been swirling since June, when it was revealed WA Police had accessed QR code check-in data.
While a health order already bans police from using the data in NSW, Digital Minister Victor Dominello said the government had decided to further strengthen privacy protections on the advice of the Privacy Commissioner.
“The bill takes the long-standing position that check-in data is to be used only for the purpose it was collected, or contact tracing, and enshrines it in legislation,” he said.
More here:
Clearly the NSW Government is seeing and reacting to the same ‘lack of trust’ issue to keep the system useful and used.
All Digital Health initiatives will increasingly need to be assessed through a trust lens!
It all seems pretty sad!
David.
No comments:
Post a Comment