Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Tuesday, October 31, 2023

I Have To Say I Did Not Know eConsults Were A Thing Until Now!

This popped up a few days ago.

EConsults? Show me the time and money

By Laura Woodrow

27 October 2023

Broad structural change is necessary if this model is ever to take off in Australia.

EConsults could increase access to specialist care and improve GP-physician relationships, if implemented well – but structural change is needed to allay concerns over remuneration and time allocation, say Australian specialists.

With a 13% rise in referrals from GPs to non-GP specialist over a decade (2006-07 to 2015-16) and 28% of patients waiting more than four weeks for non-GP specialist care, there is a growing need for easy access to timely specialist advice.

EConsults, in which GPs securely share case information with non-GP specialists for advice and support, rather than referring, have been successfully incorporated internationally as a means of asynchronous health provision.

But while the concept of an efficient platform for GP and non-GP specialist communication may appeal, concerns remain over implementation, according to a study recently published by the Australian Journal of Primary Health

The study investigated what 14 RACP fellows, across a range of specialties, genders and ages, thought of implementing eConsults, with a 72-hour turnaround time, in Australia.

According to the study, specialists generally felt this model would improve access to specialist advice and could be of “considerable benefit” for non-urgent consultations.

“RACP fellows agreed this could improve access to timely specialist advice, place downward pressure on outpatient face-to-face clinic waiting times and reduce unnecessary patient travel.”

The fellows interviewed felt that these asynchronous consultations might provide opportunity for ongoing GP education and reduce the need for future referrals or non-GP specialist advice.

But remuneration and time allocation were a recurring concern among study participants.

“It is clear from our work that Australian physicians require reassurance that they will not be pressured to add this work to existing consultation numbers and demand without support,” the researchers said.

“They also did not see the model as workable if it intruded into out-of-work time.” 

According to the researchers, for primarily public health physicians the concerns centred around time constraints.

“Without dedicated time, participants were concerned that uptake would be low among their colleagues, and that the 72-h turnaround time would not be feasible, which in turn, would reduce the effectiveness of the model,” they said.

But for private physicians, concerns were around matching existing consulting rates to face-to-face consultation rates.

Ultimately, the RACP fellows felt broad structural change would be necessary to make the model viable across Australia.

“All participants viewed the success of a future eConsult model as contingent on the formal structures that would be required to underpin it.

“They were of the opinion that eConsults would represent a fundamental change to the primary–secondary care interface, and as such, would require a proper administrative and governance structure.”

The change would require incorporating suitable and safe technology, ensuring indemnity was addressed with providers and administrative support.

“All participants viewed a formal administrative structure as essential to the success of the eConsult model of care,” said the researchers.

“An informal or haphazard approach would result in low provider satisfactions and low uptake among both GPs and non-GP specialists.”

Speaking to The Medical Republic, dermatology specialist and associate professor at the University of Queensland Jim Muir discussed an educational and resourcing platform, Tele-Derm, that facilitates advice exchange between dermatology specialists and other doctors and is currently up and running in Australia.

Professor Muir is one of four moderators of the Tele-Derm service that is provided through ACRRM, alongside Dr Dan Kennedy, Dr Rachael Foster and Dr John Bingley.

The Tele-Derm online service offers free advice and education, contributing to CPD point, to all rural doctors, whether they are ACRRM members or not, and now has around 4000 doctors registered on the platform.

Tele-Derm combines hundreds of case studies, videos, how-tos with telemedicine platform to bolster specialist advice with educational support, allowing 80% of the cases received to be managed locally by GPs, said Professor Muir.

More here:

https://www.medicalrepublic.com.au/econsults-show-me-the-time-and-money/101370

Now I understand, what we have here is really just a new name for electronically enabled joint consultation!

It seems to me there are lots of circumstances where such a care model makes perfect sense and equally some where it my not be appropriate.

I reckon it is up to each clinician how they wish to proceed with remote consultation and to go from there. There are certainly a lot of consults where virtual – especially when video-enabled -consults are totally fine – and to have two doctors involved is hardly a stretch!

What do others think?

David.

 

Sunday, October 29, 2023

I Am Not Really Sure Just Why This Is Happening.

This was announced last week:

Epic to supply NSW patient record system

Technology

By Amanda Sheppeard

23 October, 2023

The worst-kept secret in digital health is finally confirmed with news global health software giant Epic has signed up to deliver the NSW government’s promise of a single digital patient record. 

The government’s eHealth NSW department announced late last week that the contracts had been finalised to form the partnership for the project that will be rolled out over the next six years. 

“The contract signing marks an important milestone with work now starting on the initial design and build of this next generation system,” the statement said. 

Epic will work closely with local health districts, specialty health networks and other NSW Health organisations, facilitated by eHealth NSW and NSW Health Pathology. 

“Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) will be the first LHD to go live with the new platform in 2025,” said eHealth NSW. 

“The sequencing of other local health districts is currently being considered, with a readiness assessment underway.” 

The single digital patient record (SDPR) will deliver a state of the art, secure digital record-keeping platform that will transform the digital systems that NSW Health staff use every day to deliver care, according to the statement. 

“For the first time, our healthcare teams will have access to an integrated all-in-one electronic medical record system, patient administration system and pathology laboratory information system,” said eHealth NSW. 

“Having one statewide system will support consistency and continuity of care for all patients, while also streamlining the way clinicians work.” 

Clinicians will be able to access a patient’s clinical records quickly, securely, and safely, regardless of their location. The SDPR will also provide simplified clinical workflows in an intuitive, user-friendly system with streamlined technical support. 

“Patients will benefit from a better, more consistent experience no matter where they seek care,” said eHealth NSW. 

“Having confidence that their healthcare team will have all the relevant information at their fingertips.” 

The NSW government’s decision to partner with Epic Systems followed a procurement process that took more than two years and involved over 350 clinical and technical experts from across the system. 

Epic Systems is a world-leading software company specialising in the design and delivery of electronic medical records systems and associated technologies.  

Its software is currently being used in the ACT and in hospitals in Melbourne, as well as offshore in health services in the UK and the US. 

The SDPR program is working towards the following timeline: 

  • Finalise contract negotiations: 2023. 
  • Design and build: 2024–2025. 
  • Lead site deployment in Hunter New England LHD: 2025-26 
  • Statewide rollout in remaining LHDs/SHNs: 2026–2029/30 
  • NSW Health Pathology adoption: 2026–2029/30 

A website has been set up to provide more information about the SDPR program. 

The NSW government yesterday announced the planned overhaul, describing the state’s current health records system as “complex, cumbersome and outdated”. 

“Currently we have nine systems used for electronic medical records, 10 patient administration systems and five pathology laboratory information manage systems in use across NSW Health,” the government said in a statement. 

“Currently, these systems are not connected statewide. Data is routinely collected but is often unable to be shared or integrated in real time. This can create duplicative data collection or create information gaps in decision making.  

“As a result, patients may have to recall and repeat complex medical information when they’re feeling unwell. Often this is when patients are receiving care at different locations or from separate treatment teams and impacts the experience of care they receive.” 

New chief executive of NSW Health Pathology, Vanessa Janissen, told Health Services Daily a statewide pathology laboratory information management system would a key component of the single digital patient record (SDPR) and would improve pathology service delivery. 

“A statewide record keeping system will support consistency and continuity of care for all patients, including providing enhanced analytics, tools and reporting to support patient safety, and streamlining ways of working for our public health professionals,” she said. 

More here:

https://www.medicalrepublic.com.au/epic-to-supply-nsw-patient-record-system/101054

In recent weeks I have been in and around the Health System and have been quite impressed to see the level of communication and information access available both in and out of Hospital.

Here we have the announcement that all this is going to be replaced with an Epic based system over the next few years. What is not made clear is just why, having got lots of stuff working, a new transition is required for what must be pretty incremental gains, and enormous cost.

Here is how NSW Health sees the problem:

“The Challenge

Clinical information is captured in many different systems across NSW Health. Currently, healthcare teams must access several platforms to get a comprehensive patient history. These include various electronic medical record systems, patient administration systems and laboratory information management systems. This makes it difficult to quickly access comprehensive information about a patient.

Some of these systems are also not connected statewide. This means different care teams must manually request patient information from other local health districts if a patient is visiting multiple health services. Data is routinely collected but is often unable to be shared or integrated in real time. This can create data duplication or information gaps that could affect providing the best patient care possible.

To solve these challenges, a single source of clinical information is needed.”

The Plan is outlined here:

“The SDPR program will transform the digital systems NSW Health staff use every day to deliver care. All NSW Health care teams, no matter where they work, will securely access the same information about a patient in real time from one source.

The SDPR will replace several existing systems that are widely used across NSW Health services. This includes 228 public hospitals, 600+ community health centres, 60 pathology laboratories and 150+ pathology collection centres. The highly secure system will house medical, pathology and administration records all in one place.

The SDPR will be delivered collaboratively and in partnership with local health districts (LHDs), specialty health networks (SHNs) and other NSW Health organisations, facilitated by eHealth NSW and NSW Health Pathology. Input will be sought from clinicians, consumers, patients and technical experts. Epic Systems, a world-leading software company specialising in the design and delivery of electronic medical records systems and associated technologies, has been contracted to supply the technology platform for the SDPR.

SDPR will first be available in the Hunter New England LHD, followed by a phased rollout throughout NSW. The rollout schedule for the SDPR will be planned in consultation with LHDs, SHNs, and other partners.

The overall implementation timeline is anticipated to be 6 years (2023-2029/30). This includes the design and build of the system, and statewide rollout.”

It seems to me this is a HUGE project that is going to have all areas of NSW in various states of disruption for the next 6 years (if it goes on time) while all this happens and at the end of ti we wind up with a single centralised system with all the risks that brings

I bet the Business Case of this project is not disclosed but one can be sure it will be costing a fortune and that one installed it will be moving towards obsolescence! I have no idea what the disruption that will be caused will cost!

I may be wrong but this seems just too big and too centralised a project to be sensible! Empire building on a grand scale!

What do others think?

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 720 – Results – 29 October, 2023.

Here are the results of the poll.

Has The Move To A Commonwealth Funded Health Insurance System (Medicare), As Developed By Bill Hayden, Been A Good Thing, In Hindsight, For Australia?

Yes                                                                           21 (84%)

No                                                                             3 (12%)

I Have no Idea                                                          1 (4%)

Total No. Of Votes: 25

A clear outcome with most feeling that Medicare has been a good thing overall.

Any insights on the poll are welcome, as a comment, as usual!

A poor number of votes. But also a very clear outcome! 

1 of 25 who answered the poll admitted to not being sure about the answer to the question!

Again, many, many thanks to all those very few who voted! 

David.

The Federal Health Minister Unplugged! - Link Included!!

 At the end of ABC Insiders this morning (29/10/23) (On iView soon) our Federal Health Minister does a high-voltage "Elvis:" impersonation.

Has to be seen to be believed!

Here is the link:

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/health-minister-mark-butler-pulls-dad-dancing-moves-on-the-karaoke-stage/news-story/57205644136058d80690629075661808

David.


Thursday, October 26, 2023

It Looks Like The Aged-Care Health IT Sector Is Due For Some Major Rationalisation.

This appeared last week:

Use of clinical software differs greatly among providers

Natasha EganOctober 19, 2023

A research project led by the aged care sector’s technology peak body has identified high rates of data duplication, the need for standardised terminology and almost 300 unique clinical software vendors in residential aged care.

The report Residential Aged Care Use of Clinical Care Systems produced by the Aged Care Industry Information Technology Council in collaboration with the Australian Digital Health Agency was released on Thursday. It identifies the need for aged care providers to develop comprehensive data-related policies and procedures as they move to implement the royal commission’s recommendation for the universal adoption of digital clinical care technology and the My Health Record.

“First of all, the exciting thing about the report is it’s the first time we’ve had a chance to actually look at what software is in place and how it’s used end to end,” ACIITC chair Dr George Margelis told Australian Ageing Agenda on the sidelines of the Aged Care Transformation stream at Victorian Healthcare Week in Melbourne on Thursday.

“The standout finding is the heterogeneity – the differences between providers in what they’re using and how they’re using it – the lack of standardisation, not just around data but around processes, and also the fragmentation.”

The fragmentation reflects the way the industry has grown so that medication management, prescribing, inventory, payroll and so on are all separate, he said. “Nothing’s integrated and that’s because they’ve had to add systems on the fly. There’s never been a strategic roadmap saying, ‘here’s where we are going to go forward’.”

Dr Margelis is hopeful the findings will provide an opportunity to identify all the functions needed and integrate the common data across those functions with common terminologies. “The different ways things are described in the industry is frightening. And that’s just that massive fragmentation.”

The issue of integration was raised among the aged care transformation discussions on Wednesday by Tanunda Lutheran Homes chief executive officer Lee Martin. He said his organisation used more than 30 systems that did not talk to each other.  

“I don’t think we’ll ever integrate to one. But we should be able to integrate to a couple of platforms that we can use to solve the problems,” Dr Margelis told AAA.

Key report findings

  • a notable amount of duplication of core clinical information in multiple clinical systems, highlighting the importance of data integration
  • the absence of consistent terminology across the sector presented challenges in data collection and analysis
  • 287 unique clinical software vendors identified in residential aged care
  • widespread Wi-Fi connectivity
  • visiting clinicians have higher access to input, extract, and review data on-site than remotely
  • clinical software integration with visiting clinicians’ software and community pharmacy software varies widely
  • most organisations reported limited integration with My Health Record, and most did not record data in residents’ My Health system
  • organisations have varying technology investment strategies, with some lacking a specific focus on clinical software
  • barriers to clinical software adoption include the cost of products, training, upgrading, employee culture, time, resources, and digital literacy
  • a significant percentage of clinical software systems have been in deployment for five to 10 years, indicating a need for updates and improvements.

Opportunities for providers, vendors

In addition to the challenges, the report outlines opportunities for both aged care providers and software vendors.

“The key message for providers is that there are opportunities for efficiency,” Dr Margelis told AAA. “Because of their fragmentation, there’s a lot of inefficiency, double entry of data, disparate data and same data being captured in different formats in different systems.

More here:

https://www.australianageingagenda.com.au/technology/use-of-clinical-software-differs-greatly-among-providers/

This looks like a useful report that shows just what is needed to remedy the present chaos in the sector.

Worth a browse!

David.

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Does It Make Sense To Make Patients Wait For Their Results?

Since way back when patient access to results has been delayed so the clinician can review the results and discuss anything that may be worrying with the patient to avoid panic, scares or worse!

End seven-day ‘lock’ on patients seeing tests results in My Health Record: Mark Butler

Viewing results without a doctor's explanation is low risk, says the health department's consultation.

Antony Scholefield

19 October 2023

Health officials will weigh up whether pathology and imaging results in My Health Record should still be “locked” from patient access in the first week after they are uploaded.  

The seven-day delay was introduced back in 2014 so that patients were less likely to look at results on their own before a doctor had explained them, according to the federal Department of Health and Aged Care.

There are a few exceptions — such as tests for respiratory illnesses, including COVID-19, and results for HbA1c and INR tests.  

However, Minister for Health and Aged Care Mark Butler said earlier this year that the delay were “a barrier to good clinical practice, cause untold frustration for Australians”.

He called for them to be scrapped in all but exceptional circumstances.

The health department opened a consultation on potential changes last month, where it argued that immediate access to imaging and pathology reports would “empower consumers to better manage their own health and protect others in the community”.

More here:

https://www.ausdoc.com.au/news/end-seven-day-lock-on-patients-seeing-tests-in-my-health-record-butler/

The concern has always been a patient seeing a result reading “cancer” or some such and not being able to find out quickly and easily what it means for them!

Frankly I think this is a real concern and that some care and moderation is needed with a few results.

With the exception of “life-threatening” reports I see no issue with instant access as long as the exception management works well and that people are not terrified by something that they do not understand!

What do others think?

David.

 

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

I Have To Say I See Preserving A Lead In AI Technology As A Strategic Imperative

 This appeared a few days ago:

America takes dead aim at China’s plan for global AI domination

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

October 19, 2023 — 5.11am

The US is escalating its semiconductor war against China. Xi Jinping’s plan for global mastery of artificial intelligence and supercomputing is about to collide with the hard reality of American power.

Cutting-edge AI requires ultra-fast chips and enormous “compute” power to train large language models as they draw on ever larger pools of data. Any company that lacks access to these chips will see costs spiral upwards, leaving it unable to compete at the technology frontier.

Nvidia, the US market leader in AI chips, says the rule of thumb is that the computing power required doubles every six to 12 months. China has spent some $US100 billion ($157 billion) in three successive “Manhattan Projects” trying to develop a world-class chip industry, but is not yet close to parity. It lacks access to the lithography needed to master miniaturisation below 7nm (nanometres).

The Biden administration has been pulling its punches on semiconductor controls, but this is about to change. The departments of state, defence, commerce, and energy have agreed on a tougher regime for advanced chips and supercomputing technology.

It will split the world into two camps: either you are in the advanced US sphere, or you are in the Chinese sphere with areas of strength in “mid-critical” semiconductors but a step behind where it really matters.

The White House imposed restrictions on chip exports to China a year ago. It limited the rate of data transfer to 600 gigabytes per second (GB/s) and to computation power of 4800 trillion operations per second (TOPS). Nvidia has continued to supply China but with modified chips that halve the rate of data transfer. This makes no difference for chips in laptops or 4G mobile. It is critical for AI or weapons technology.

It will split the world into two camps: either you are in the advanced US sphere, or you are in the Chinese sphere with areas of strength in “mid-critical” semiconductors but a step behind where it really matters.

Washington will now tighten the noose. It will happen just as Nvidia rolls out a new chip next year that will be three times faster. “The technological gap between cutting-edge chips and what China is permitted to buy is set to widen,” said a report by Capital Economics.

China’s semiconductor champion SMIC has cracked homegrown chips at scale down to 7nm for Huawei’s new smartphone. This is impressive, but it is still not enough to play in the top league of global AI. Catching up will become even harder henceforth. “They are close to reaching the limits of what is achievable with deep ultraviolet lithography (DUV) machines,” said the report.

China needs the next generation of “extreme” ultraviolet lithography (EUV) just to match the 4nm AI chips manufactured for Nvidia by TSMC in Taiwan, let alone for even better chips. The only company in the world that makes these rare $US200 million machines is the Dutch firm ASML, itself reliant on critical components from California. The ASML devices are covered by the US embargo.

It will take years for China to replicate its own EUV capability, years that China does not have. By then the contours of the AI revolution will be established, framing the world’s digital and economic ecosystem far into the 21st century.

It is possible that China could leapfrog today’s existing silicon wafers by jumping to advanced compound semiconductors based on graphene or silicon carbide that are ten times faster, or by using photonics that can move data at the speed of light – both areas where Britain is a world leader.

These have the potential to slash energy use and overtake the current “fabs” being built at $US20 billion a shot in Europe. Chinese cyber-espionage is working overtime trying to hack the technology, but that is easier said than done.

Capital Economics says the AI revolution could lift productivity rates by 1.5 percentage points a year in the long run, but only for the winners. The US will top the AI rankings over the next two decades because of its overwhelming lead in investment, backed by vibrant capital markets and elite universities. It will be followed by Singapore, the UK, Switzerland, Sweden, South Korea, and Canada, in that order.

“This would mean a gradual – but striking – end to the period of low productivity growth which has dogged developed economies for most of this century,” said Neil Shearing, the group’s chief economist. It could lift annual tax revenues by 2 per cent of GDP – ceteris paribus – and make it much easier to outgrow sovereign debt burdens.

Rather than seeing the rise of the Global South as the West declines, we may see the West pull ahead again. Asian tigers that cleave to the US will prosper. Those that cleave to China will reap fewer gains.

Stanford University’s AI Index shows that the UK has captured as much private investment in AI as the whole of the eurozone combined. London has burgeoned into a global AI cluster with Google DeepMind and Stability AI, among others, but what it lacks is serious computing power. Electricity costs are too high to meet the voracious needs of data centres.

Capital Economics thinks Europe will drop the ball on AI, just as it dropped the ball on the IT and digital revolution. “History may be repeating itself,” it said. The Nordics will do well, but the large eurozone states will be held back by labour rigidities, lack of venture capital and poor cloud infrastructure.

The emerging economies and most of the BRICS-11 will be left behind. The picture is more or less the opposite of conventional wisdom. Rather than seeing the rise of the Global South as the West declines, we may see the West pull ahead again. Asian tigers that cleave to the US will prosper. Those that cleave to China will reap fewer gains.

China will be in the middle of the pack at 19th place, leading in image recognition and self-driving electric cars. It will struggle in other areas, hobbled by top-down control and censorship, and by Xi’s habit of chopping down any tech tycoon who threatens Communist Party control.

Taiwan window of opportunity

If this is where the AI world is heading, Xi may be tempted to forestall it. His window of opportunity for retaking Taiwan will narrow as China’s workforce shrinks, old age dependency goes parabolic, and the growth speed limit falls to 2.5 per cent.

A seaborne assault on the island would be dangerous, but we do not know how deeply the Taiwanese military is penetrated by Chinese sympathisers, or whether the opposition Kuomintang has the stomach for a fight.

Xi may never have another chance like today when the US military is stretched on the twin fronts of Ukraine and the Middle East. Taiwan would deliver TSMC and 90 per cent of the world’s production of advanced chips, as well as the booty of EUV lithography machines – if the Hsinchu Science Park survived the assault.

An awkward thought in these tense times.

The Telegraph, UK

Here is the link:

https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/america-takes-dead-aim-at-chinas-plan-for-global-ai-domination-20231018-p5ed3v.html

I strongly suspect the rivalry discussed here is really much more important and consequential that the hot war we are seeing between Israel and Hamas – horrible and lethal though it is!

I find the story of the different technologies and their scattering around the world fascinating and quite instructive, seeing this contest as really future shaping!

The most obvious area where the chips matter in is imaging where I am sure many Nvidia chips are found!

Well worth a read!

David.

I Have To Say I Did Not Know eConsults Were A Thing Until Now!

This popped up a few days ago.

EConsults? Show me the time and money

By Laura Woodrow

27 October 2023

Broad structural change is necessary if this model is ever to take off in Australia.

EConsults could increase access to specialist care and improve GP-physician relationships, if implemented well – but structural change is needed to allay concerns over remuneration and time allocation, say Australian specialists.

With a 13% rise in referrals from GPs to non-GP specialist over a decade (2006-07 to 2015-16) and 28% of patients waiting more than four weeks for non-GP specialist care, there is a growing need for easy access to timely specialist advice.

EConsults, in which GPs securely share case information with non-GP specialists for advice and support, rather than referring, have been successfully incorporated internationally as a means of asynchronous health provision.

But while the concept of an efficient platform for GP and non-GP specialist communication may appeal, concerns remain over implementation, according to a study recently published by the Australian Journal of Primary Health

The study investigated what 14 RACP fellows, across a range of specialties, genders and ages, thought of implementing eConsults, with a 72-hour turnaround time, in Australia.

According to the study, specialists generally felt this model would improve access to specialist advice and could be of “considerable benefit” for non-urgent consultations.

“RACP fellows agreed this could improve access to timely specialist advice, place downward pressure on outpatient face-to-face clinic waiting times and reduce unnecessary patient travel.”

The fellows interviewed felt that these asynchronous consultations might provide opportunity for ongoing GP education and reduce the need for future referrals or non-GP specialist advice.

But remuneration and time allocation were a recurring concern among study participants.

“It is clear from our work that Australian physicians require reassurance that they will not be pressured to add this work to existing consultation numbers and demand without support,” the researchers said.

“They also did not see the model as workable if it intruded into out-of-work time.” 

According to the researchers, for primarily public health physicians the concerns centred around time constraints.

“Without dedicated time, participants were concerned that uptake would be low among their colleagues, and that the 72-h turnaround time would not be feasible, which in turn, would reduce the effectiveness of the model,” they said.

But for private physicians, concerns were around matching existing consulting rates to face-to-face consultation rates.

Ultimately, the RACP fellows felt broad structural change would be necessary to make the model viable across Australia.

“All participants viewed the success of a future eConsult model as contingent on the formal structures that would be required to underpin it.

“They were of the opinion that eConsults would represent a fundamental change to the primary–secondary care interface, and as such, would require a proper administrative and governance structure.”

The change would require incorporating suitable and safe technology, ensuring indemnity was addressed with providers and administrative support.

“All participants viewed a formal administrative structure as essential to the success of the eConsult model of care,” said the researchers.

“An informal or haphazard approach would result in low provider satisfactions and low uptake among both GPs and non-GP specialists.”

Speaking to The Medical Republic, dermatology specialist and associate professor at the University of Queensland Jim Muir discussed an educational and resourcing platform, Tele-Derm, that facilitates advice exchange between dermatology specialists and other doctors and is currently up and running in Australia.

Professor Muir is one of four moderators of the Tele-Derm service that is provided through ACRRM, alongside Dr Dan Kennedy, Dr Rachael Foster and Dr John Bingley.

The Tele-Derm online service offers free advice and education, contributing to CPD point, to all rural doctors, whether they are ACRRM members or not, and now has around 4000 doctors registered on the platform.

Tele-Derm combines hundreds of case studies, videos, how-tos with telemedicine platform to bolster specialist advice with educational support, allowing 80% of the cases received to be managed locally by GPs, said Professor Muir.

More here:

https://www.medicalrepublic.com.au/econsults-show-me-the-time-and-money/101370

Now I understand, what we have here is really just a new name for electronically enabled joiunt consultation!

It seems to me there are lots of circumstances where such a care model makes perfect sense and equally some where it my not be appropriate.

I reckon it is up to each clinician how they wish to proceed with remote consultation and to go from there. There are certainly a lot of consults where virtual – especially when video-enabled - consults are totally fine – and to have two doctors involved is hardly a stretch!

What do others think?

David.

 

Sunday, October 22, 2023

We Have Lost A Man Who Fundamentally Changed Healthcare in Australia.

 This appeared late yesterday:

Former Governor-General Bill Hayden dies aged 90

Former Governor-General and ALP leader Bill Hayden has died, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed.

 Steve Zemek

AusHealthIT Poll Number 719 – Results – 22 October, 2023.

Here are the results of the poll.

Will The Loss Of The Voice Referendum Lead To Less Effort / Funding In The Crucial Area Of Aboriginal Health?

Yes                                                                                8 (30%)

No                                                                               17(63%)

I Have no Idea                                                             2 (7%)

Total No. Of Votes: 27

A clear outcome with most feeling that funding levels will not change.

Any insights on the poll are welcome, as a comment, as usual!

A poor number of votes. But also a very clear outcome! 

2 of 27 who answered the poll admitted to not being sure about the answer to the question!

Again, many, many thanks to all those very few who voted! 

David.

Saturday, October 21, 2023

I Am Having Major Network Issues => Use davidgmore@gmail.com To Contact Me If Needed!

 It is a lovely spring day in Sydney - far away from the horrors of the world!

David.

Monday 10am - Issues seem to be resolved!

D.

Friday, October 20, 2023

It Really Seems Like A Lot Has Happened With ChatGPT In A Year!

Spotted this this week:

Incredibly smart or incredibly stupid? What we learned from using ChatGPT for a year

As the tool becomes less of a curiosity and more a part of daily life, fans are finding clever uses – and discovering limitations

Matthew Cantor

@CantorMatthew

First published on Fri 13 Oct 2023 00.00 AEDT

Next month ChatGPT will celebrate its first birthday – marking a year in which the chatbot, for many, turned AI from a futuristic concept to a daily reality.

Its universal accessibility has led to a host of concerns, from job losses to disinformation to plagiarism. Over the same period, tens of millions of users have been investigating what the platform can do to make their lives just a little bit easier.

Upon its release, users quickly embraced ChatGPT’s potential for silliness, asking it to play 20 questions or write its own songs. As its first anniversary approaches, people are using it for a huge range of tasks. We’ve all heard about uses like crafting emails, writing student essays and penning cover letters. But with the right prompts, it can take on jobs that are more esoteric but equally useful in everyday life. Here are a few that might come in handy.

Jargon demystifier

You’re at a work meeting, and the accountants are talking about GAAP operating income for Q4 of FY22, the design people are panicked about kerning, and the CEO wants you to circle back to drill down on some pain points. On top of that, your British boss says your work is “quite good” but strangely doesn’t seem happy with it, while your US colleague claims everything anyone has ever done is amazing. Users say they’ve turned to ChatGPT for help as an intermediary, employing it to translate workplace jargon so everyone’s on the same page about the concerns you flagged, tnx.

This isn’t limited to the office: people have used ChatGPT to, for instance, translate a sleep study’s medical terminology, or help craft a legal opinion. It can serve as an intergenerational go-between: users have turned it into a gen Z slang translator (sample sentence from a description of a key historical event: “Titanic, flexing as the unsinkable chonk, sets sail with mad swag, a boatload of peeps, and the vibes of a 1912 rave”).

Pitiless critic

Sometimes you want a real critique of your work, a harsh assessment that your friends and family are too nice to provide. For some, ChatGPT is that critic (though whether the word “real” applies here is debatable). “I use ChatGPT to brutally audit where my copy is falling short of the target audience’s expectations,” a copywriter wrote on Reddit. Some have even found it can give decent (if imperfect) criticism of fiction writing, pointing out redundancies, missing characterization or weak imagery.

There are, of course, ethical questions about the use of ChatGPT in work and school settings. In response, some argue that asking it to be your critic, and learning from its feedback, is a way to improve your writing without letting it put words in your mouth.

It’s not always an easy task: what it gives you depends entirely on how you structure the prompt. Some users find it tough to find the language to “convince” it to be harsh enough. And you’ll get more appropriate feedback if you give it a detailed task – “give me feedback” might not help as much as “I’m writing an essay for college – tell me whether it’s well-structured and clear”.

Robot with feelings

Maybe you don’t want ChatGPT to be mean – maybe you want the opposite. Users have asked ChatGPT for help being nicer in their work emails, especially when they’re secretly fuming. “I write to it: please make me sound like less of an asshole,” said one user.

Sous chef

It’s dinnertime and there’s stuff in the kitchen – but you have no idea what to do with a half-eaten yogurt, a leftover chicken leg, a bag of flour and some forgotten tomatoes on the verge of becoming truly upsetting. Users report that ChatGPT has helped them create impressive meals out of what they have, or come up with ideas based on what’s around and a specified grocery budget. Many users report being pleased with the results, though some recipes sound perhaps too creative: garbanzo bean and cheddar cheese soup, a peanut butter and Nutella quesadilla, and a “carrot and grape salad with muesli crunch” (based on what’s in my own kitchen).

ChatGPT invents an odd recipe. Photograph: ChatGPT/Screenshot

Last month, OpenAI, the tool’s developer, added an image-recognition feature that makes this task even easier – instead of having to list ingredients, users can take photos of the food in their cabinets and ChatGPT will come up with recipes.

Results have been mixed. Beyond the fact that the bot has no taste buds, some users have expressed safety concerns, saying ChatGPT may, for example, convince inexperienced chefs to undercook meat.

Whiteboard interpreter

Following the update allowing ChatGPT to “see”, users have found its interpretation skills to be alarmingly impressive. In a clip making the rounds, an AI developer, Mckay Wrigley, shows it a hand-drawn flowchart on a whiteboard, which it’s able to turn into code that Wrigley runs – and it works. The platform can even tell that the green arrows indicate the steps should be reordered. So you can stop beating yourself up for never having learned to code.

Speedy summarizer

ChatGPT can act as your personal SparkNotes, condensing large quantities of information into small ones – whether that information is in the form of articles, meeting notes or book chapters. Combined with the right browser plugin, it can even summarize entire YouTube videos so you don’t have to listen to an insufferable Ted Talker.

Here is the full link text:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/12/chatgpt-uses-writing-recipes-one-year

Certainly we are seeing all sorts of ideas on how to use this AI. I, for one, would not have expected how fast we have moved!

David.

 

Thursday, October 19, 2023

This Looks Like Very Good News Indeed Given How Many Sepsis Kills!

 

This appeared last week:

Sepsis treatment on next stage of clinical trials across hospitals throughout the country

By Nicholas Finch

6:31PM October 12, 2023

Australian scientists are developing a new treatment for deadly sepsis, and are moving onto the next phase of clinical trials across the country.

The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health discovered that patients administered with sodium ascorbate showed signs of improved organ functions across the body, and needed less medical assistance in restoring blood pressure.

The results were positive enough for researchers to investigate the effects of sodium ascorbate outside of sepsis treatment. Potential benefits include assisting in open heart surgery, ­treating a subarachnoid haemorrhage or traumatic brain injury, and acting as an immune stimulant for immunocompromised patients.

The Florey Institute successfully tested the chemical on an unresponsive patient in 2020, then trialled it from then until 2022 with 30 patients at Melbourne’s Austin Hospital.

The results of the study have been published in the journal Critical Care, which found that patients administered with the drug showed improved kidney function, reduced requirements for blood pressure-maintaining drugs, and reduced multi-organ dysfunction.

The next phase of clinical trials will involve 300 patients over 1 to 1.5 years.

The World Health Organisation said in 2020 that sepsis was responsible for 11 million deaths every year. Austin Hospital’s director of intensive care research, Rinaldo Bellomo, said that its extremity and speed makes sepsis the biggest killer in intensive care units across the world.

“People may not appreciate how big a problem sepsis is,” Professor Bellomo told The Australian. “Your kidneys don’t work, your lungs don’t work, your circulation malfunctions, your liver malfunctions, and your chance of dying is around 20 per cent. And this is a much bigger risk than having a heart attack, which is the sort of thing that people immediately understand and recognise.”

Lots more here:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/science/sepsis-treatment-on-next-stage-of-clinical-trials-across-hospitals-throughout-the-country/news-story/83078700609111051f0126d92ff4e160

Given the lethality of sepsis every 1% improvement matters.

We can only hope for more soon!

David.

Tuesday, October 17, 2023

Ozempic Seems To Be Getting A Lot Of Attention. Care Is Required With On-Line Sales And Marketing At Least!

Fads are a commonly seen manifestation in the health sector.

It could be argued to latest biggie is semaglutide (Ozempic). The drug was introduced as a treatment for Type 2 diabetes but it is the powerful weigh-loss effects that have been noticed in the overweight rich world – which now has a shortage and which has the drug selling in such quantities that it is having a real impact on the Danish GDP! (Yes it is not cheap!)

This is a useful review of what is going on!

Possible Ozempic side effects investigated by Australian drug regulator

By Aisha Dow and Henrietta Cook

October 10, 2023 — 11.22am

Australia’s medicine regulator is investigating several reports of intestinal obstructions in patients using the diabetes turned weight-loss drug Ozempic, in a step that could lead to a change to the drug’s product information.

Ozempic, which has been in short supply since Hollywood stars and influencers boosted its reputation as a quick weight-loss solution, has already been associated with several potential complications, including pancreatitis, diarrhoea, nausea and low blood sugar.

Gary Wittert, an endocrinologist from the University of Adelaide, said these and other possible side effects should serve as a reminder that Ozempic was a medication “intended to treat serious disease”.

“It’s not meant to be thrown around to lose a few kilograms here or there.”

Last month, the US drug regulator, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), updated Ozempic’s labelling to recognise that cases of a gastrointestinal disorder called ileus have been reported following use of the drug.

Ileus stops the bowel from working normally to move waste out of the body.

Australia’s Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA) confirmed it had also received three reports of intestinal obstructions and one case of “ileus paralytic”, though a spokesman stressed that there may be no link between these events and the medicine.

The TGA is investigating the issue to see if local updates are required to the drug’s product information.

Prescriptions for Ozempic have exploded in recent years in Australia and around the world, in a trend linked to its growing reputation as a fat-burning drug, and off-label prescribing of the medicine designed as a treatment for type 2 diabetes.

A weight-loss version of the drug, called Wegovy, has not yet been made available in Australia.

Wittert said when Ozempic was properly prescribed for type 2 diabetes, it was a life-saving medication for many people. He said it could also be extremely beneficial for patients whose health and quality of life are being harmed by obesity.

“I use it to treat people with diabetes who have got significant obesity and significant obesity-related comorbidities, and it changes their lives completely. And it’s been extremely frustrating, and sometimes distressing for people, to find that they can’t get it… because it’s being used inappropriately,” he said.

Wittert said Ozempic worked on at least three parts of the body. It works on the gut, slowing gastric emptying, which may help explain cases of ileus.

He said it also works on the pancreas and has been linked to rare cases of pancreatitis. Finally, he said it works on the brain to decrease appetite.

Since 2020, 91 cases of pancreatitis following the use of Ozempic, otherwise known as semaglutide, have been reported to the TGA.

“It is important to note that reporting of an adverse event to the TGA or publication in the DAEN does not necessarily mean that a causal link with the medicine is established,” a TGA spokesman said.

Dr Terri-Lynne South, chair of the obesity management group with the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, said gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects of Ozempic. Other patients reported constipation or diarrhoea, she said.

South said although the class of drugs that Ozempic belongs to had been around for quite a while, they were still learning about the long-term impacts of Ozempic, which was first developed about a decade ago.

A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk, the company behind Ozempic, said patient safety was a top priority for the company and it worked closely with the FDA and TGA “to continuously monitor the safety profile of our medicines”.

More here

https://www.smh.com.au/national/possible-ozempic-side-effects-investigated-by-australian-drug-regulator-20231009-p5easx.html

With popularity comes all sorts of problems and potential misuse.

Amazingly there are even counterfeit injector pens (it is usually a weekly injection).

https://www.novonordisk-us.com/media/news-archive/news-details.html?id=166119

What with some misuse, counterfeit injectors and really significant side-effects my feeling is this is a drug to be used by experts for patients with diabetes and those at risk of developing it! (which leaves out the Hollywood set etc.)

Having an on-line free for all will end badly and as for it being flogged by on-line drug peddlers as is now happening I reckon regulatory intervention is well overdue. Could give telehealth a very bad name unfairly and do some real harm!

David.


Sunday, October 15, 2023

Adoption Of The Voice Has Failed But Health System Improvements Must Proceed!

Australia has voted on the Indigenous Voice To Parliament:

‘The Australian people always get it right’: Deputy prime minister

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says the government will continue its work on reconciliation and closing the gap despite the defeat of the Voice to parliament referendum.

“Obviously for those of us who are supporting the Yes campaign, it wasn’t the night we hoped for, and I am disappointed, but the Australian people always get it right, and we absolutely accept this result,” he said on ABC’s Insiders this morning.

“But I don’t take last night as any vote against reconciliation, and I think both sides of the argument made that clear, even in their comments after the result last night, nor do I take this as a vote against a will, on the part of the Australian people, to see a closing of the gap in social disadvantage which affects Indigenous Australians.

“To close the gap, and from the government’s point of view, obviously that is now our focus. The Australian people have asked us to do this in a different way. We hear that and we’ll do that and we will now look at how we can work harder.”

Marles said the government had of course weighed up the issues when it became clear the Coalition decided against supporting the Voice, but they always believed it was best to press on.

“Did we understand that it was more difficult? Of course we did. But we didn’t go to the election saying, ‘We will take this to the Australian people so long as Peter Dutton agrees’,” he said.

Here is the link:

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/voice-referendum-results-live-updates-australia-rejects-constitutional-change-pm-says-government-will-accept-result-20231014-p5ec9o.html?post=p55bgp#p55bgp

In the end it wasn’t even close with the NO vote fining up at close to 60%

It seems clear that despite this overall rejectionist sentiment there are a great number of health related initiatives (including Digital Health development) that need to continue and be further evolved..

The physical and mental health of many of the First Australians is simply unconscionable and an outcome of the failed referendum must surely be to make sure the efforts at consultation with and health support of this population are accelerated and not reduced.

The sad thing is that after a gazillion reports we all know what needs to be done and what resources are required. The time for actual delivery has now arrived, as we put to failed referendum behind us and move forward in a positive way! I wonder will our Governments step up?

David.