Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

It Is My View The Labor Party I Being Way Too Ideological and Impractical On Major Health System Initiatives.

Last week the Labor Party said they would oppose the Legislation authorising the new planned national screening register.

Telstra's $178m cancer register deal under attack

By Allie Coyne on Sep 15, 2016 3:01PM

Labor, Greens want operation in government hands.

Labor and the Greens are fighting the government's $178 million plan to outsource its new national cancer screening register to Telstra, arguing the sensitive data should not reside with a private company.
Telstra won the five-year contract for implementation and maintenance of the system, which will record the cancer screening results of 11 million patients, in May.
The register will replace eight state and territory cervical cancer screening registers, and one paper-based bowel screening register, to provide a single record for each individual. The system will interact with My Health Records, Medicare and private health providers.
The database will be used by state and territory governments, general practices and pathology services, and private and public health providers.
However, Labor and Greens MPs argue the data in the register is too sensitive to be handed to a for-profit private sector organisation to look after.
The government tried to pass legislation that would enable the register this week, but came up against the two parties when they combined their votes to send the bills to senate committee for scrutiny.
Labor and the Greens want to add amendments to the legislation that will mean only the government or not-for-profits could operate the register.
"The government signed the contract despite no legislation having been passed to establish the national register, and they are now trying to rush through legislation without giving parliament the time to properly consider the implications of their hushed deal," Labor health spokesperson Catherine King said.
More here:
In parallel we have this announcement:

No, the Medicare payment system won't be privatised

13 September 2016
The Department of Health has disbanded the unit looking at outsourcing Medicare payments, effectively confirming the system won't be privatised.
The department also directed PricewaterhouseCoopers - the private firm advising the unit - that the payment system must remain delivered by government.
It reflects an election commitment made emphatically and repeatedly by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull that all Medicare services currently delivered by government would stay that way.
In an email to staff seen by AAP, Secretary Martin Bowles advised he's establishing a Medicare and Aged Care Payments Division from Monday.
Staff working on the $5 million 'digital payments services task force' - which was used as partial proof by Labor that the coalition was planning to privatise Medicare - would be transferred to the new division.
More here:
Just a few observations on all this.
First just what is the difference between Accenture, Orion and others being the commercial providers for the myHR and Telstra Health operating a Cancer Registry? We need to remember that it was Ms Roxon from Labor who contracted Accenture / Orion for the PCEHR!
Second elsewhere Labor has outsourced major IT projects in  other domains (e.g. NDIS etc.)
To me the opposition to Telstra and the resistance to outsourcing the Medicare Payments systems are political opportunism and opposition for the sake of it, and nothing to do with what Labor would do (and has done) in Government.
No wonder we are all sick of the ways our pollies are behaving at present. They simply could not lie straight in bed as they say!
David.

Monday, September 19, 2016

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 19th September, 2016.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Quite a busy week with lots of problems with ePIP, Cancer Registries and a range of other issues.
Lots of headlines to browse and to click through.
-----

Englishman now in charge of $1 billion digital health records system doctors refuse to use

September 11, 20165:37pm
Sue Dunlevy News Corp Australia Network
EXCLUSIVE
THE man who led the dumped UK digital health record system has been put in charge of Australia’s bungled $1 billion e-health record and is being paid as much as the Prime Minister to fix it.
Former journalist Tim Kelsey will be paid a total remuneration package worth $522,240 a year, almost the same as Malcolm Turnbull and just shy of the $548,360 paid to the Chief of the Navy and more than the Chief Scientist, the head of the Fair Work Commission and the Inspector General of Taxation, a remuneration tribunal determination reveals.
The former NHS executive is an interesting appointment as CEO of the Australian Digital Health Agency because he was in charge of the UK digital health records scheme Care.data dumped by the UK’s National Health System in July.
The Department of Health stated that Mr Kelsey is uniquely suited to the role because of his experience with data and digital platforms in health and personal privacy.
-----

To email your patients or not to email

Authored by  Cate Swannell
ONLINE portals using secure pathways may be the best available solution to the dilemma of doctor-patient email communications, which sees practices lagging behind the “willingness of their patients” to connect via email.
A systematic review published in Family Practice showed that far more physicians want to use email communication with their patients than actually do use it. In Europe, for example, it was shown that only 7.4% of the European population communicated with a physician using email or the web.
“In the UK, 52% of general practitioners responded as willing to use such a communication with their patients, and 37% had already received one or more emails from their patients,” the author of the review, Assistant Professor Jumana Antoun from the American University of Beirut, wrote.
-----

Unleashing the power of people - How digital services can transform healthcare

Created on Monday, 12 September 2016
The Agency will shortly be launching an Agency blog. Here is our first post from the Agency CEO Mr Tim Kelsey.
Everybody in Darwin is hoping for rain: it is heating up and a humid summer is coming. We drive along the foreshore towards Palmerston, past the mangroves that mantle the ocean. I have been invited by Dr Sam Heard to come and listen to patients and staff in his practice, the Palmerston GP Super Clinic. It is a great innovation – a joint venture between Charles Darwin and Flinders universities to give local people access to comprehensive primary care services in one setting, from medical and pharmacy through to podiatry. It has more than 100,000 patient encounters every year. It is a training centre – there are 18 registrars and 10 students and you can tell people really want to work here. This is how you learn to be a great clinician – working in teams, bringing every professional skill to bear to improve outcomes for your patients. Sam, who would never say this himself, is a globally respected expert in primary care and has championed the importance of data and technology in medicine for many years.
Sam introduces me to David who is 35 and drives through the door in his wheelchair, with a broad smile on his face. David tells me his story. He was an internet entrepreneur and ran a website that reviewed software, until his life was shattered by illness eight years ago. He went into hospital for a routine operation and was the victim of a hospital-acquired infection, and everything went wrong for him after that. At this point, David says that hospitals are dangerous places – and best to be out of them. He has had both feet amputated (as a consequence of diabetes) and has been in hospital for very long periods with a variety of conditions, including pancreatitis. This is a brave man, somebody who knows the desolation of ill health.
-----

Labor moves to block $220m contract with telco giant for medical register

September 13, 2016 3:08pm
TELSTRA and the Federal Government are in a major brawl with Labor which wants to veto the telco as the operator of a register of highly-sensitive medical information.
At issue is the privacy of records ranging from Pap smear results to gender transitions.
The Opposition wants to bar all for-profit companies from running the register of cancer histories, part of Labor’s determination to keep health management within the public sector.
A decision to give Telstra control of a mountain of cancer screening data was revealed by the Health Department just four days before the election, and before legislation creating the register had been approved.
-----

Govt’s Telstra cancer register contract criticised

Telstra earlier this year won a $220-million contract to establish and operate the National Cancer Screening Register
Rohan Pearce (Computerworld) 13 September, 2016 16:29
Labor’s shadow health minister, Catherine King, has launched an attack on the government over its decision to award to Telstra a contract to operate the new National Cancer Screening Register.
The National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and the National Cancer Screening Register (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2016 are currently before the House of Representatives. The bills will create the National Cancer Screening Register, which will replace nine existing registers including the states’ cervical cancer register.
In May the Department of Health announced it had awarded the contract to establish and operate the register to Telstra. The $220 million contract has an initial term of five years with an option for a 10-year extension.
-----

Telstra will not run cancer-screening database if Labor has its way

Labor has said it will try to ensure that only government or non-profit organisations are able to handle sensitive health data for the National Cancer Screening Register.
By Chris Duckett | September 14, 2016 -- 04:24 GMT (14:24 AEST) | Topic: Enterprise Software
A push is on to prevent Telstra from implementing a AU$220 million contract it won prior to the July federal election, with Labor looking to introduce changes that would prevent the telco from handling the data.
In May, Telstra Health was awarded a deal to construct and run the new Australian National Cancer Screening Register for the next five years, with the database to maintain patient records for cancer testing across the country.
Shadow Minister For Health And Medicare Catherine King said on Tuesday that the government signed the contract despite not having legislation in place to establish the Register, and it would allow Labor to make amendments.
-----
14 September, 2016

Despite glitches, most meeting eHealth upload targets

Posted by Julie Lambert
General practices that fail to meet upload targets for the eHealth incentive program may escape financial penalties if they can show their efforts were foiled by software glitches.
Practices that fell short of the target and did not opt-out of the new incentive scheme introduced in the May-July quarter are being asked to give back payments they may have received.
The Health Department has confirmed officials are reviewing Practice Incentive Program and My Health Record data to check whether practices are meeting the ePIP requirements to upload a portion of their patients’ health summaries to the MHR system.
But the department has also signalled a possibly more flexible approach that may avoid penalising those that come up short.
-----

GPs failing to regularly upload e-health records

By Paris Cowan on Sep 14, 2016 5:00PM

AMA slams new ‘penalties’ for doctors.

As many as 1500 GP clinics have failed to meet the minimum benchmark for My Health Record participation in the past quarter and risk losing thousands of dollars in incentive payments as a result, the Australian Medical Association has claimed.
It said as many as 40 percent of GPs are still not equipped to regularly upload shared health summaries into the system, and one-third of the clinics previously receiving funds to help them with the e-health transition now risk a shortfall of more than $24,000 a year.
The AMA slammed the government’s move to toughen the eligibility criteria for incentive payments for MyHR participation, claiming it will “erode the goodwill of GPs” rather than prompt them to upload more patient data into the national health records system.
-----

Doctors forgo $23,000 and opt-out of uploading patient data to MyHealth record

September 14, 20167:13pm
Sue Dunlevy News Corp Australia Network
DOCTORS are so opposed to the troubled $1 billion taxpayer funded e-health record they are refusing a $23,000 incentive payment to upload patient information into the system.
From May doctors had to upload 0.5 per cent of their patients’ records to the new system to qualify for a $23,000 practice incentive payment as the government struggles to get doctors to use it.
The AMA has revealed 30 per cent of GPs will miss out on the payments because they have refused to do this.
Without these records outlining a patient’s health condition these records are virtually useless and it means even though taxpayers have spent $1 billion on the record doctors are not using it.
-----

Government to investigate e-health PIP failure

Antony Scholefield | 15 September, 2016 |  
The Federal Health Department will investigate the e-health Practice Incentives Program after more than one thousand practices failed to hit targets for uploading shared health summaries.
Due to a controversial revamp of the e-health PIP in May, practices are now required to upload shared health summaries to the MyHealth Record system for at least 0.5% of their patients.
However, it emerged on Wednesday, that out of more than 5000 practices registered for the e-health PIP, 1500 had not met the new requirements for their quarterly payments.
A further 222 practices had simply withdrawn from the program, according to the AMA.
-----
  • Opinion
  • Sep 16 2016 at 1:29 PM
  • Updated Sep 16 2016 at 2:09 PM

Exploding phones and heart-stopping hacks its a dangerous tech world out there

Hackers have been targeting pacemakers and medical records, which is a big reason to feel scared for many.
A worried air hostess leans over and says, "be careful! Your Samsung Galaxy Note 7 might explode in your hands!"
I'm holding a Nexus 6, but she shakes her head ruefully anyway: Technology, it's deadly. Yes, Samsung has recalled 1 million of their new premium mobile phones because of serious fire and burn hazards. A fault with the rechargeable lithium battery prompted the handset to explode in the hands of a 6-year-old in Brooklyn, New York and he was rushed to hospital.
Since then, reports of the phones catching fire have quadrupled.
Understandably, the boy has reportedly refused to go near any smartphones, though it's probably helpful to point out that rechargeable lithium batteries themselves are the workhorses of portable power; they're in powertools, e-cigarettes, vibrators and Samsung's new wireless earbuds.
-----

Detailed Clinical Model Library - Clinical Informatics

Created on Monday, 12 September 2016
The Clinical Informatics unit is pleased to announce the latest release of the Australian Digital Health Agency's Detailed Clinical Model Library (v4.4).
Download the full release file bundle from the following location on the Agency website:
The accompanying release note outlines changes in the Detailed Clinical Models and the triggers for the changes.
-----

Will you play a part in driving the digital transformation of Australian healthcare?

Created on Friday, 16 September 2016
Message from Jim Birch, Chair of the Australian Digital Health Agency: Will you play a part in driving the digital transformation of Australian healthcare? The Board of the Australian Digital Health Agency is calling for people to support it in driving the digital transformation of Australian healthcare.
To ensure we get the best minds in the country to support us in this critical work, we are appealing to people across the community to express their interest in joining an Advisory Committee to support the Board and help shape the Agency’s focus and work.
We are establishing Advisory Committees in the areas of:
  • Clinical and Technical
  • Consumer
  • Privacy and Security
  • Audit and Risk
  • Digital Health Safety and Quality Governance
-----

EXCLUSIVE – Moving towards a ‘Person-Centred’ approach to healthcare

OpenGov Asia speaks to Andrew Saunders, Health CIO, Department of Health & Human Services, Victoria to learn more about his role and aim to transform the healthcare services sector

14/09/2016
How long have you been in your current role? Were you brought in with a specific objective, drawing on your experience in the private sector to achieve a certain goal?
I joined in August 2015.
The department wants the Health CIO to work collaboratively in the Victorian public health sector devolved governance model, be able to bring the sector together and agree a digital health strategy, especially around the sharing of clinical information, and support the health services in working together on joint initiatives.
In Victoria, we have 86 health services and 32 independent community health services. My team supports the health services in providing health ICT design and shared service, as well as performing a sector wide ‘health systems management’ role to ensure that the end to end system is working together, meeting minimum standards and positioning itself to leverage future technological advances.
Another key part of the role is to enable the appropriate sharing of information between the health and social care functions of the department to support a person centred approach to health and well-being.
-----

What are the hottest tech jobs in Australia?

IT leaders in high demand during 2016.
Holly Morgan (ARN) 16 September, 2016 05:30
The IT industry's hiring activity is expected to surge as Australian businesses continue to align business strategy with IT investment.
According to findings from recruitment firm Hays, the alignment driving this increase in IT hiring is aimed at supporting new business models and systems to boost efficiency, and enhance customer engagement in the digital era.
As the ongoing reliance on digital technologies, such as the Internet of Things, continues, candidates with the ability to translate data into actionable business outcomes will be valued, alongside cyber security expertise in protection, compliance and audit of such data.
-----

No, the Medicare payment system won't be privatised

13 September 2016
The Department of Health has disbanded the unit looking at outsourcing Medicare payments, effectively confirming the system won't be privatised.
The department also directed PricewaterhouseCoopers - the private firm advising the unit - that the payment system must remain delivered by government.
It reflects an election commitment made emphatically and repeatedly by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull that all Medicare services currently delivered by government would stay that way.
In an email to staff seen by AAP, Secretary Martin Bowles advised he's establishing a Medicare and Aged Care Payments Division from Monday.
-----

Plenty Valley and Northern Health eReferral Prokect leads pilot program to co-ordinate services

Katrina Hinschen, Whittlesea Leader
September 13, 2016 12:01pm
PATIENTS’ medical referrals will be a click of a doctor’s mouse away under a new electronic system being trialled in Melbourne’s north.
Plenty Valley and Northern Health eReferral Project, led by Plenty Valley Community Health Service, is one of three Victorian health services consortiums selected to lead the pilot program.
Health Minister Jill Hennessy said the Victorian eReferral Program will make patient referral processes more efficient, safer and reliable.
“Instead of relying on old fashioned paper referrals that can be easily lost or misplaced — this cutting-edge electronic technology makes it quick and easy for GPs to make a referral,” Ms Hennessy said.
-----

Mandatory Breach Reporting For Health Records – What You Need To Know

Last Updated: 13 September 2016
Most Read Contributor in UK, August 2016                                           
Mandatory data breach reporting is the buzz word in privacy and cyber risk circles. Many Australian governments (including the incumbent) have sought to introduce legislation requiring all Australian businesses to report data breaches that compromise personal information collected or held by those businesses. But no government has yet succeeded. Except that is, for certain health service providers, who should take note – if you're handling certain types of health records, you may already be required to report such breaches.

What is 'mandatory reporting' – and is it relevant for my business?

The Privacy Act applies to Australian individuals and businesses with a turnover of over AUD 3 million, and to those providing a health service and who hold health information irrespective of turnover. Currently, the Privacy Act does not require that your customers or the Office of the Australia Information Commissioner (OAIC) be notified of a data breach that compromises their personal information. That is likely to change in time – and draft legislation could (if implemented) extend such mandatory reporting obligations to all businesses subject to the Privacy Act. In the meantime, notifications are encouraged by the OAIC as part of a data breach response plan, where the disclosing party thinks there may be a real risk of serious harm to the individual as a result of the breach.

I run a health services business – how does this affect me?

In addition to the requirements of the Privacy Act, healthcare providers accessing, processing and storing 'My Health Records' are subject to a mandatory data breach reporting regime. This regime has been in place since the inception of the My Health Record scheme in 2012 and requires notification, in certain circumstances to the My Health Record System Operator (i.e. the Secretary of the Department of Health) and the OAIC, of data breaches affecting an individual's My Health Record.
-----
12 September, 2016

Man overboard: Why has MedicalDirector swapped CEOs?

Australia’s largest patient management system provider,  MedicalDirector, has quietly changed its CEO of nearly three years, Phil Offer, replacing him with Matthew Bardsley, previously the Chief Information Officer at Primary Healthcare
Although it only came to light last week that Offer had been replaced – he has been seen around the traps spruiking the new cloud-based version of MedicalDirector at various events as CEO – it is apparent that the change took place as a result of MedicalDirector’s acquisition by private equity (PE) some five months ago.
No-one at MedicalDirector or Affinity, the PE owner of the group,  was prepared to comment on the change.  PE tends to be like that – private. But the shift to Bardsley, if it is meant as a longer-term change, could be an indication that the new owners want more speed at the pointy end of the business – technology. Bardsley has been a long-time presence at MedicalDirector as a tech lead. His shift to CEO might be so the company can get more progress on its new versions of the software, especially the cloud-based Helix edition.
-----

HCF backs Curo Tecnologies’ sensors for elderly

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM September 13, 2016

Supratim Adhikari

Health insurer HCF is investing $1 million into Curo Technologies, a Melbourne-based health tech start-up that is looking to better leverage wireless sensor technology to help the elderly.
Founded by Victorian brothers Matt and Tim McDougall, Curo is one of the first graduates out of HCF’s Catalyst program, an annual initiative run in partnership with accelerator program Slingshot that is designed to help local healthcare-focused companies ­develop and accelerate their businesses.
Catalyst is Australia’s first corporate-supported accelerator aimed at start-ups in the health tech space. While Curo is one of nine businesses to graduate from the 2016 HCF Catalyst program, it is the only one HCF has decided to put money into, with chief strategy officer Sheena Jack saying Curo’s solution tackles one of the key challenges facing the healthcare industry in Australia.
-----
  • September 15 2016 - 10:48AM

Federal intelligence agencies recruiting hackers to attack government systems

Henry Belot
Federal intelligence agencies are hiring hackers to test the security of government infrastructure and to attack foreign targets.
The recruitment drive, which offers recruits "a licence to hack", comes after a number of attacks on government agencies including the Department of Human Services during the census collection period. 
Other targets include Austrade, the Defence Science Technology Group and the Bureau of Meteorology, which was breached last year by Chinese-based hackers. 
Another 97 federal departments have reportedly been told to encrypt more data amid hundreds of attempted intrusions every month.
-----

Defects and delays keep Royal Adelaide Hospital on critical list

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM September 16, 2016

Rebecca Puddy

Today the doors of the nation’s most expensive building, the ­imposing 10-storey Royal Adelaide Hospital, standing tall on the banks of the River Torrens, should swing open to receive patients.
The $2.3 billion facility, which has earnt the accolade of the world’s third most expensive building (after New York’s One World Trade Centre and Bucharest’s Palace of the Parliament), is set to be Australia’s first paperless hospital delivering state-of-the-art healthcare, with private rooms and lush gardens.
But in reality, the site remains a 24-hour building site, a mecca for workers in hard hats and high-vis vests. Delays and mistakes in the building of the nation’s most ­advanced hospital have continually pushed back deadlines, prompting a bitter legal battle ­between the state government and its builders.
-----
COMMENT
  • September 11 2016 - 11:00PM

We should get technology to the people who need it most - the homeless

·         Melanie Raymond
Digital technology has great potential to be a force for empowerment, and, in so many ways, it has already allowed us to be a nation of self-publishers, commentators, entrepreneurs and disrupters.
But access to technology is far from universal. Research from welfare groups shows a nation heavily reliant on mobile technology but it also reveals a strong digital divide. Nearly half those on welfare payments, especially those living alone and older people, do not have home internet access. While rates of mobile phone ownership are high, low-income groups routinely run out of credit sooner than expected and experience "bill shock".
Far from empowering all people, technology can deepen and reinforce the disadvantage already experienced by the nation's homeless, estimated to be at least 105,000.
-----

Hills Health plans merger with Lincor Solutions

ICT services company Hills is to spin off its Health Solutions business as it prepares to merge with technology company Lincor Solutions and create a new stock market listing.
Hills, maker of the iconic Hills clothes hoist, announced on Tuesday that it had entered into a conditional merger agreement to combine its HHS business with Lincor.
Hills chairman Jennifer Hill Ling said that while the company’s expanding healthcare solutions operations had the potential to become a key profit driver within Hills in coming years, “the opportunities for the healthcare business and its growth potential are much greater as part of Lincor Limited on a global basis”.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Sunday, September 18, 2016

It Rather Looks Like The ePIP Incentive Is Blowing Up In The Department Of Health’s Hands.

This appeared last week:

Doctors forgo $23,000 and opt-out of uploading patient data to MyHealth record

September 14, 20167:13pm
Sue Dunlevy News Corp Australia Network
DOCTORS are so opposed to the troubled $1 billion taxpayer funded e-health record they are refusing a $23,000 incentive payment to upload patient information into the system.
From May doctors had to upload 0.5 per cent of their patients’ records to the new system to qualify for a $23,000 practice incentive payment as the government struggles to get doctors to use it.
The AMA has revealed 30 per cent of GPs will miss out on the payments because they have refused to do this.
Without these records outlining a patient’s health condition these records are virtually useless and it means even though taxpayers have spent $1 billion on the record doctors are not using it.
Four years after it was launched only one in five Australians has signed up for a MyHealth record and this includes one million Australians enrolled through an opt-out trial.
News Corp has revealed the government was issuing records to people who had been dead for decades.
The government has employed Tim Kelsey, a former journalist and head of the UK’s own failed e-health record system, to fix the mess. He’s being paid as much as the prime minister.
Doctors have little interest in using the record because it does not mesh with existing practice software, only one in five patients have one and it does not include necessary information such as scans and blood tests.
The AMA is now warning the government’s decision to link GP practice incentive payments to using the record could see doctors lose $23,000 a year in income — putting further pressure on their ability to provide billed visits.
AMA vice president Dr Tony Bartone said the Australian Medical Association has made repeated representations since June to Health Minister Sussan Ley about how harmful the PIP changes will be to GPs who are already burdened by the Medicare rebate freeze.
“The PIP Digital Health Incentive has now been in place for a full quarter and the AMA has been advised that 1500 general practices have failed to meet their SHS upload target, and a further 69 practices have formally withdrawn from participation in the incentive,” he said.
More here:
There is additional coverage here:

GPs failing to regularly upload e-health records

By Paris Cowan on Sep 14, 2016 5:00PM

AMA slams new ‘penalties’ for doctors.

As many as 1500 GP clinics have failed to meet the minimum benchmark for My Health Record participation in the past quarter and risk losing thousands of dollars in incentive payments as a result, the Australian Medical Association has claimed.
It said as many as 40 percent of GPs are still not equipped to regularly upload shared health summaries into the system, and one-third of the clinics previously receiving funds to help them with the e-health transition now risk a shortfall of more than $24,000 a year.
The AMA slammed the government’s move to toughen the eligibility criteria for incentive payments for MyHR participation, claiming it will “erode the goodwill of GPs” rather than prompt them to upload more patient data into the national health records system.
The federal government doles out the payments in exchange for medical practices adopting compliant software and processes that hook into its My Health Record e-health system.
But in May it stepped up its demands, asking GPs to upload shared health summaries for a minimum of 0.5 percent of the patients they see each quarter in order to keep receiving the funds.
Getting doctors adding to patient records has been one of the perennial headaches of the My Health Record implementation, with the Department of Health revealing in April that only 300 of the 8625 clinics in Australia are regularly using the system.
But the AMA has warned the government its eligibility reform risks getting doctors further offside.
More here:
These articles were driven by this AMA press release:

Draconian PIP requirements another hit to General Practice

14 Sep 2016
AMA Vice President, Dr Tony Bartone, said today that tough new changes to the Practice Incentive Program (PIP) Digital Health Incentive requirements could leave many individual general practices more than $20,000 worse off.
In May this year, the Government introduced a PIP eligibility requirement that practices must upload Shared Health Summaries (SHS) for at least 0.5 per cent of their patients each quarter.
Dr Bartone, a Melbourne GP, said the AMA has made repeated representations since June to Health Minister Sussan Ley about how harmful the PIP changes will be to GPs who are already burdened by the Medicare rebate freeze.
“An AMA survey indicated that up to 40 per cent of eligible general practices would be unable to meet the new requirements,” Dr Bartone said.
“The PIP Digital Health Incentive has now been in place for a full quarter and the AMA has been advised that 1500 general practices have failed to meet their SHS upload target, and a further 69 practices have formally withdrawn from participation in the Incentive.
“This means that close to one-third of previously eligible general practices now face losing significant financial support in an already testing environment of the Medicare rebate freeze and other funding cuts.
“Based on the results of our survey, practices that do not comply now face the very real threat of losing around $23,400 a year in PIP payments.
“The AMA is urging the Minister to do the right thing by hardworking GPs and introduce a moratorium on the SHS upload target,” Dr Bartone said.
The AMA Council of General Practice (AMACGP) referred its concerns about the PIP changes to the AMA Federal Council, which adopted the following policy resolutions at its August meeting:
• That Federal Council calls on the Commonwealth Government to agree to a moratorium on the loss of PIP incentives for those practices that fail to meet the new Digital Health Incentive requirements, and to ask the Practice Incentive Program Advisory Group to undertake a review of the reasons why practices were unable to comply and to make recommendations on how these might be addressed.
• That Federal Council calls on the Commonwealth Government to ensure that any future changes to the PIP Digital Health Incentive are based on the advice of the Practice Incentive Program Advisory Group.
Dr Bartone said that the Government decided to implement the new SHS requirement despite the contrary advice of all GP groups on the Department of Health’s Practice Incentive Program Advisory Group.
“It is now time to recognise the concerns that have been consistently raised by the profession and get a better understanding of why so many practices have failed to meet the Government’s SHS benchmarks,” Dr Bartone said.
“With adequate time, education, and support, many of the affected 1500 general practices may well begin to genuinely engage with the MyHealth Record, and eventually champion it. 
“But penalising them with draconian eligibility requirements at this critical point will have the opposite effect.
“It will undermine support for e-health initiatives within general practice.
“And it will further erode the goodwill of GPs who have been disadvantaged by Government health policies such as the Medicare freeze, and unfairly targeted and demonised in recent leaks from the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review.” 
More here:
Following this I note there is now to be an enquiry as to what went wrong:

Government to investigate e-health PIP failure

Antony Scholefield | 15 September, 2016 | 
The Federal Health Department will investigate the e-health Practice Incentives Program after more than one thousand practices failed to hit targets for uploading shared health summaries.
Due to a controversial revamp of the e-health PIP in May, practices are now required to upload shared health summaries to the MyHealth Record system for at least 0.5% of their patients.
However, it emerged on Wednesday, that out of more than 5000 practices registered for the e-health PIP, 1500 had not met the new requirements for their quarterly payments.
A further 222 practices had simply withdrawn from the program, according to the AMA.
The department said it planned to review both the PIP and MyHealth Record data to find out what was happening.
It said some practices had experienced a combination of issues, including problems with software, which prevented them meeting their e-health PIP targets.
It was considering ways to ensure practices that had made “genuine efforts to comply" but were "prevented from doing so by circumstances beyond their control" were not penalised.
More here:
To me the core issue here is that the Government is bribing GPs to upload clinical information to a system that is hardly used and that can’t be much good if the Government feels bribery in needed to have it used.
Spending this much money, and now undertaking an enquiry and to what has gone wrong, just smacks of pure desperation to me!
I wonder has anyone assessed the clinical and financial value to the country is paying $23,000 to thousands of GPs to upload an occasional Shared Health Summary of unknown utility and quality? (5000 practices times $20K is a lot of money on the face of it! ($125M)).
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 336 – Results – 18th September, 2016.

Here are the results of the poll.

Do You See The myHR As The Highest Priority For The ADHA Or Are There Other Issues (e.g. Secure Messaging)That Need To Be Addressed First?

Other Issues Need Addressing 98% (132)

The myHR Is The Highest Priority 1% (1)

I Have No Idea 1% (2)

Total votes: 135

What amazing unanimity again. It seems most think the myHR is a fair way down the priority list!

I hope the ADHA is listening!

A really great turnout of votes.

Again, many, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.