Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, August 13, 2009

International News Extras For the Week (10/08/2009).

Again there has been just a heap of stuff arrive this week.

First we have:

EPS R2 goes live in Leeds

29 Jul 2009

Release 2 of the Electronic Prescription Service has gone live at its first site in Leeds, NHS Connecting for Health has announced.

Liptrots pharmacy and Calverley Medical Centre have become the first pharmacy and GP practice in England to use EPS R2.

They are using Cegedim’s Pharmacy Manager and TPP’s SystmOne, the first pharmacy and GP systems to be accredited for EPS R2.

EPS R2, which was originally due to go live in October 2007, delivers much of the business benefit of the electronic transmission of prescriptions, including nomination of pharmacies, electronic prescription signing and the ability for GPs to electronically cancel prescriptions.

CfH said EPS R2 was a necessary evolution from the out of date paper prescription system. It added: “With 1.5 million prescriptions being issued every day across England and the total increasing by 5% every year, the NHS needs an efficient, clinically-safe, electronic system, able to cope with this pattern of prescribing.”

Much more here:

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5072/eps_r2_goes_live_in_leeds

It is interesting to see how advanced the functionality offered with this new release is.

Second we have:

Maine Demonstrates Statewide HIE

HDM Breaking News, July 31, 2009

Maine's statewide health information exchange has gone live with a one-year demonstration program that will involve 15 hospitals and more than 2,000 clinicians. That includes more than one-third of practicing physicians in the state.

The demonstration follows more than three years of preparation, including developing, implementing and testing the data exchange platform during the past year. Information technology vendors for the project are Orion Health, Santa Monica, Calif.; 3M Health Information Systems, Salt Lake City; and DrFirst Inc., Rockville, Md.

Hospitals initially are supplying most of the data to be exchanged in the HIE, called HealthInfoNet. Data available in a standards-based Continuity of Care Record includes demographics; conditions, diagnoses or problems; allergies; prescription medications; laboratory results; and dictated/transcribed documents including diagnostic imaging reports. Data also is coming from pharmacy benefit management firms and two reference laboratories.

Some 70% of physicians in Maine are employed by hospitals. Along with hundreds of these doctors, four primary care physicians working at Martin's Point Health Care, a 34-member independent group practice, also are participating in the demonstration.

Lots more here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/HIE-38757-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e958:100325a:&st=email

More information is available at hinfonet.org.

This is certainly a large effort involving Health Information exchange at a very significant level.

Third we have:

Feds to host NHIN software code-a-thon

By Mary Mosquera
Friday, July 31, 2009

The Health and Human Services Department will sponsor a “code-a-thon” Aug. 27 so open source programmers can meet to collaborate on ways to improve the CONNECT gateway, software that lets organizations access the Nationwide Health Information Network.

A code-a-thon is typically held by open source communities so that programmers can collaborate for a day or a weekend on writing code for specific high priority items for an open source project.

“The code-a-thon gives programmers an opportunity to meet face to face and get to know each other rather than simply just communicating by email,” said David Riley, the CONNECT program lead for the Federal Health Architecture (FHA) program in the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.

Reporting continues here (with links):

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=71916

This is good work that is being done as this software will certainly help provide connectivity in the US Healthcare sector.

Fourth we have:

ANSI approves new healthcare RFID standard

By Shawn Rhea

Posted: August 2, 2009 - 5:59 am EDT

The Health Industry Business Communications Council's new set of standards for using radio-frequency identification tags to label and track medical products has received final approval from the American National Standards Institute, according to a news release.

Much more here (registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090803/REG/308039987

Another brick in the standards wall which may help as we decide to develop such standards.

Fifth we have:

Cardiovascular Consultants launches new EHR

July 31, 2009 | Kyle Hardy, Community Editor

LOS ANGELES – Cardiovascular Consultants Medical Group, a Los Angeles-based care provider, has deployed a new electronic health record.

With their implementation, CCMG hopes to be on the leading edge of IT adoption. The group specializes in consultative and interventional cardiology that includes focuses in cardiac electrophysiology with laboratories offering echocardiography services. The e-Medsys EHR will be available across the medical group's five office locations encompassing 13 physicians and four nurse practitioners.

More here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/cardiovascular-consultants-launches-new-ehr

Initiate Systems Unveils Patient Registry

px px(7/31/2009) px Initiate Systems, Inc. (Chicago) is launching Initiate Catalyst Patient Registry, a virtual software appliance designed to accelerate data interoperability for EMRs, portals, radiology information systems, PACS and other healthcare information exchange (HIE) solutions.

According to the company, the tool provides independent software vendors with entity resolution and search capability that can be embedded in their information exchange applications and portals to improve patient care.

More here:

http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=BCDB3B97037D44F3A8027916FA421DFE

This company is a major provider of identity management software that does not rely on UPI’s for patient linkage.

Seventh we have:

Hospital's 'Virtual Iraq' helps PTSD sufferers face their fears

By JOANNA RICHARDS

TIMES STAFF WRITER

FRIDAY, JULY 31, 2009

SYRACUSE — Upstate Medical University on Thursday unveiled a new treatment option for veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

"Virtual Iraq" offers an interactive, multisensory experience — like an enhanced video game — allowing soldiers to confront and gradually conquer their fears in a safe, private and controlled environment.

"The young vets seem more likely to take to this kind of therapy," said Robbi T. Saletsky, director of the university's Cognitive Behavior Program for Depression and Anxiety Disorders. "There's less stigma attached to it; it seems cool."

Ms. Saletsky demonstrated a treatment session in her office for the press. Volunteer Cristy L. Samuel, an Iraq war veteran and pre-medical student at Syracuse University, simulated the role of a patient. She is not a victim of PTSD, but said she would recommend the treatment for veterans with the condition.

During the mock therapy session, Ms. Saletsky prepared her patient to relive a moment in combat that had haunted her.

Much more here:

http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20090731/NEWS03/307319936

Important to see the range of technologies in use to help soldiers who are suffering post war.

Eighth we have:

Providers May Need Four Years to Implement ICD-10

Lisa Eramo, for HealthLeaders Media, July 31, 2009

Industry experts have repeatedly said that ICD-10 implementation must begin immediately in order for hospitals, health plans, and vendors to meet the October 1, 2013 compliance deadline. But now there is detailed evidence to prove it.

On July 20, the North Carolina Healthcare Information and Communications Alliance, Inc., (NCHICA) and The Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) released a timeline that quantifies each ICD-10 preparation task in terms of the number of days it will take to complete.

NCHICA and WEDI estimate it will take providers nearly 1,286 work days to implement ICD-10. For vendors, it will take nearly 1,521 work days to complete. And the clock is ticking.

"The NCHICA-WEDI timeline shows graphically that the full time from now to October 2013 will be required to successfully meet the compliance deadline. We cannot continue to delay this effort," said Holt Anderson, executive director of NCHICA in a press release.

For providers, the figure takes into account 256 days to organize the implementation effort. The timeline also outlines 36 months for identifying process improvements (e.g., how hospitals intend to use more specific data to target education or treatment for certain patient populations), 14 months for internal system design/development, 12 months for internal testing, 12 months for vendor code deployment, and 10 months for external testing.

Although the numbers may sound daunting, the writing has definitely been on the wall since CMS' January 16, 2009 publication of the ICD-10 final rule. Hospitals should already be well on their way toward planning for the change.

Full article here:

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/236816/topic/WS_HLM2_LED/Providers-May-Need-Four-Years-to-Implement-ICD10.html

The Americans are certainly struggling with this. Australia has been using ICD-10 for at least a decade.

Ninth we have:

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

States Preparing for Health Data Exchange Stimulus Money

by George Lauer, iHealthBeat Features Editor

At varying rates of speed and using different vehicles, states are trying to get prepared to accept and intelligently use considerable amounts of federal money to transform a paper-based health industry to one reliant on digital technology.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act identifies about $36 billion to be used for health IT over the next several years nationwide.

One of the first orders of business is determining whether states themselves want to coordinate the connections that will allow physicians, hospitals, insurers, pharmacies and patients to share information electronically. Some small states may elect to take on health information exchange in-house but most large states are expected to contract the job to industry experts.

In California, potential contractors are ahead of the process, with two contenders so far in a race that has yet to be declared or described.

California is expected to get about 10% of the national pie -- or $3.6 billion.

Some of the first installments -- as much as $30 million -- could be spent relatively quickly, once the state determines how to spend it.

Much more here:

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Features/2009/States-Preparing-for-Health-Data-Exchange-Stimulus-Money.aspx

It is interesting to see the plans that are evolving to deploy Health IT using the ARRA stimulus funds.

Tenth we have:

Scandal-plagued eHealth gets third CEO in 3 months, fourth by end of year

By Keith Leslie (CP) – 2 hours ago

TORONTO — The opposition parties accused the Liberal government of incompetence Tuesday after eHealth Ontario named its third chief executive officer in as many months, with a fourth to be appointed before the end of this year.

The government can play musical chairs with the CEOs all it wants, but the bottom line is Health Minister David Caplan should be fired, said Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak.

"It's either incompetence or neglect, neither of which is excusable when it comes to scarce health dollars," said Hudak. "We need a new minister to come in there and clean up this mess."

The New Democrats repeated their call for Caplan's resignation, and said rotating through CEOs only creates uncertainty at eHealth and detracts from its mandate to develop electronic health records.

"It shows the government in a scramble and they're trying to plug a leaking dike, but the whole eHealth situation is one the government has fumbled very, very badly," said NDP Leader Andrea Horwath.

More here:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gx-EW3eIWrjPyfQIj3IHLD733mOA

This is the last mention we will give this – I hope they will now move forward!

Eleventh for the week we have:

The Role of Telehealth in Medical Tourism

Scott C. Simmons and Dr. Anne E. Burdick

published online: Aug 4, 2009

Telehealth, also known as telemedicine, is the remote provision of health care services enabled by technology. A continuum of successful telehealth applications have been demonstrated over the last twenty years, ranging from the transmission of digital photographs and patient histories for diagnostic consultation, to remote monitoring of physiologic data for chronic disease management, to interactive patient physical examination using medical video endoscopes and ultrasound over high-definition videoconferencing links. The common tie among these varied applications is that technology is used to improve access to health care services independent of geography.

Telehealth can improve quality, efficiency and customer service in medical tourism applications by better coordination of care between providers in patients’ home and foreign countries, enhanced preoperative and postoperative care, and optimizing patient and family member travel. This article describes the basic principles and applications of telehealth and explores the potential roles and challenges of telehealth in medical tourism.

Much, much, more here:

http://medicaltourismmag.com/detail.php?Req=230&issue=11

I must say the link was not immediately obvious before I read this!

Twelfth we have:

CA Expands Offerings for Virtualized Data Centers, Private Clouds

CA said support for VMware vSphere 4 and Cisco Nexus 1000V will help its customers achieve lean IT by providing model-based management using CA’s integrated infrastructure availability, performance and automation management solution.

IT management software company CA announced a strategy for optimizing IT services by improving the management of next-generation virtualized data centers and private clouds. CA said its solution for unified business service assurance and automation would involve coupling comprehensive availability and performance management for VMware vSphere 4 environments and Cisco virtualized network switches.

CA is broadening the scope of its Spectrum Infrastructure Manager, eHealth Performance Manager and Spectrum Automation Manager to encompass in one integrated, end-to-end management solution both physical and virtual server and network environments, as well as databases, voice and unified communications systems and other networked applications. The products are being enhanced to support VMware vSphere 4 and the Cisco Nexus 1000V distributed virtual software switch, which is an integrated option in VMware vSphere 4.

Much more here:

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Midmarket/CA-Expands-Offerings-for-Virtualized-Data-Centers-Private-Clouds-731481/

This is a bit geeky, but I had not thought of the idea of a ‘private cloud’. The applications to e-Health are reasonably obvious.

Thirteenth we have:

Take Two Digital Pills and Call Me in the Morning

Silicon Valley Has a High-Tech Prescription to Cure Health Care's Swollen Costs and Inefficiencies, but the Prognosis Is Uncertain
By DON CLARK

Hospitals are costly places. Andrew Thompson hopes his company can help keep people out of them.

His Silicon Valley start-up, Proteus Biomedical Inc., is testing a miniature digestible chip that can be attached to conventional medication, sending a signal that confirms whether patients are taking their prescribed pills. A sensing device worn on the skin uses wireless technology to relay that information to doctors, along with readings about patients' vital signs.

Corventis's wireless sensor monitors patients on the go.

More here (subscription required):

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934548487503195.html

It is not clear to me that there is a technological fix for the over-bloated US health system!

Fourteenth we have:

Weighty Choices, in Patients’ Hands

· By LAURA LANDRO

Diagnosed with breast cancer last year at 51, Mary Bianchi balked when her surgeon laid out an aggressive plan for treatment: a lumpectomy and removal of lymph nodes without first testing them to see if the cancer had spread. She went home and surfed the Web for information about additional options, but soon felt overwhelmed by the plethora of choices.

Patient Maria Hom, center, asks Dr. Shelley Hwang, an associate professor of surgery at the UCSF Breast Center, questions with the help of a pre-medical intern, Alexandra Teng. Interns act as coaches for patients, helping them brainstorm questions and making sure all their concerns are addressed in meetings with doctors.

Ms. Bianchi then sought a second opinion at the University of California, San Francisco Breast Care Center. The center’s Decision Services unit gave her videos and booklets on the risks and benefits of different treatment options. It also offered her a personal coach to help brainstorm questions and concerns, accompany her on doctor visits and make audio recordings of medical consultations. “It really enabled me to calm down and rationally think things through,” says Ms. Bianchi. “For the first time I felt like a participant in the decision-making process.”

For patients like Ms. Bianchi, the current health-policy debate comes down to a very personal issue: how to make ever-more-complex decisions when faced with multiple options, each with no clear advantage and with risks and harms that patients may value differently. Preliminary data from the National Survey of Medical Decisions, conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan, showed that doctors are more likely to discuss the advantages of treatments while giving short shrift to the disadvantages. The study also found that doctors often offer their opinion but much less frequently ask the patient’s own opinion.

“There are an increasing number of situations where there is not a clear-cut winner in terms of treatment, and patients don’t get the information they should about side effects and things that could go wrong before making decisions,” says Karen Sepucha, a scientist at the Health Decision Research Unit of Massachusetts General Hospital. “The result is a huge disconnect between what patients truly care about and what providers feel is most important for patients.”

Though decision-aid programs cost money to deliver, they appear to save money in the long run. Studies show that when patients understand their choices and share in the decision-making process with their doctors, they tend to choose less-invasive and less-expensive treatments than they would have otherwise received. A number of states and policymakers in Washington are considering legislation that would provide funding to study the use of shared-decision-making programs and in some cases require such programs to be offered to patients as part of the informed-consent process.

Much more here (subscription required):

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203674704574328570637446770.html?mod=djemHL

There are a lot of tools cited here to assist patients in their decision making.

Fifteenth we have:

Rural hospital hinging future on federal incentive

By DAVID A. LIEB (AP) – 18 hours ago

OSCEOLA, Mo. — Electronic medical records are a life-or-death issue at Sac-Osage Hospital — not necessarily just for the patients, but for the hospital itself.

Facing a budget shortfall, the 47-bed hospital in rural western Missouri is borrowing nearly $1 million to pitch its paper medical charts and purchase a state-of-the-art electronic health records system. The hospital is hinging its survival on what it hopes will be a $3 million windfall of federal incentives for hospitals that go digital.

"If that doesn't happen, we're shutting it down," Sac-Osage CEO Jeff Speaks said. "We're rolling the dice."

It's the final gamble for a hospital that already has laid off staff, is operating on a $370,000 deficit and is warning of dozens of deaths if local voters on Tuesday don't also approve a property tax to keep its emergency room open and ambulances running.

The stimulus act signed by President Barack Obama directs $17 billion to doctors and hospitals, beginning in 2011, that make "meaningful use" of electronic medical records. In 2015, health care providers could face financial penalties if they haven't made the switch.

Much more here:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jkmyjjnR55MOKKxakffgwp0LbVFwD99RUL4O1

Quite a roll of the dice!

Sixteenth we have:

New Epidemic Fears: Hackers

By BEN WORTHEN

The government is committing billions of dollars for technology systems that help healthcare providers share information. But making patient data more accessible has the unpleasant side effect of it potentially falling into the wrong hands.

Under the Obama administration's stimulus bill and other proposals, portions of a $29 billion fund are available to reimburse hospitals and doctors' offices that invest in electronic records systems and other software that might improve care and lower health-care costs. The government has stressed the need for increased security as part of this digitization initiative, but hasn't yet proposed mechanisms for how the data will be protected.

Now, many privacy advocates are concerned the administration's effort could end up making health information less secure. "If there isn't a concerted effort to acknowledge that the security risks are very real and very serious then we could end up doing it wrong," says Avi Rubin, technical director of the Information Security Institute at Johns Hopkins University.

Much more here (subscription required):

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124933240378002457.html

Definitely a concern that will need to be addressed.

Fifth last we have:

Practice Fusion adds PHR, cloud computing system

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: August 5, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Practice Fusion, a San Francisco-based developer of Web-based electronic health records and practice-management applications offered free of charge to office-based physicians willing to put up with advertising on their systems, has announced it will add a personal health-record system to its EHR offering and that both will use cloud computing infrastructure and services.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090805/REG/308059990

Well I suppose advertising supported EHRs etc are inevitable!

Fourth last we have:

Norwegian nurses warm to robots

04 Aug 2009

A Norwegian study has shown that staff in the nursing care sector would welcome sensor and robot technology in the homes of the elderly and in nursing homes.

The study carried out for the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional technologies by SINTEF, the largest independent research group in Scandinavia, revealed that nurses saw the potential for robots to free up their time and help the elderly stay in their homes for longer.

The study was carried out to highlight and address the challenges that the nursing and care sector may face during “the elderly boom” when there will be fewer people of working age and an increasing elderly population.

More here:

http://www.ehealtheurope.net/news/5093/norwegian_nurses_warm_to_robots

Interesting report.

Third last we have:

Thursday, August 06, 2009

War Game Forecasts Future of Electronic Records

by Leonard M. Fuld and Kim Slocum

"Dateline: April 3, New York, N.Y.: Microsoft makes a play for Allscripts, then failing that attempt, pursues Kaiser Permanente to create an exclusive EHR-PHR agreement with the pre-eminent managed care behemoth. Allscripts independently cuts a deal with a large health care company to expand its sales force to aggressively penetrate the 80%-plus physicians who currently do not use EHRs."

Almost none of this has happened yet -- except within the confines of a war game used to stress test company strategies in the rapidly changing electronic health records industry. This war game, "The Battle for Healthcare Information," took place this spring, employing savvy health care-experienced business school students from Columbia, Kellogg, MIT and Wharton business schools. They formed teams, representing a variety of EHR players: Allscripts, Kaiser Permanente, McKesson and Microsoft.

If this war game proves as prescient as past public simulations, then expect most of the following predictions to become reality:

  • EHR adoption will come more slowly than expected. Entrenched interests will continue to resist EHRs. Health care system change, engendered by EHRs, means that some interests will win dollars while other traditional players, such as hospitals, may lose -- and no one wants to lose.
  • A shortage of technical manpower will slow down implementation of EHRs, no matter how much money is thrown at it.
  • The "pure players," such as Allscripts (as well as Cerner, Eclypsis, Epic and a half-dozen others) likely will be acquired in the next few years.
  • Small medical practices will band together. The market that is driving efficiencies, such as EHRs and other scalable solutions, will act as a catalyst to force small medical practices to band together or merge in the next few years.
  • No more "walled gardens". Health plans will be forced to untether their records. Tethered patient health records (PHRs) will become historical artifacts.

Much more here (with links etc):

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Perspectives/2009/War-Game-Forecasts-Future-of-Electronic-Records.aspx

This is just fascinating!

Second last for the week we have:

The White House's HIT man: An interview with David Blumenthal, MD

The nation's health information technology coordinator is trying to help get physicians up and running with electronic health records systems.

By David Glendinning, AMNews staff. Posted Aug. 3, 2009.

David Blumenthal, MD, came to his latest job just after it became a whole lot busier.

When President Obama on March 20 appointed Dr. Blumenthal, 60, to be the national health information technology coordinator, it was barely a month after the enactment of a federal stimulus package that included about $19 billion in net Medicare and Medicaid incentives for electronic health records adoption. A major part of the coordinator's job is to help determine how to use the EHR stimulus money and other inducements for physicians to become part of a national, interoperable health IT infrastructure.

The appointment also coincided with the release of a study authored by Dr. Blumenthal and other researchers that found only 1.5% of nonfederal U.S. hospitals use a comprehensive EHR system -- a lower adoption figure than some past estimates. A study by the same group published in June 2008 found that only 4% of physicians are using comprehensive EHRs.

American Medical News recently spoke with Dr. Blumenthal about his first several months on the job.

Question: President Bush in 2004 established a 10-year goal of getting most of the country on interoperable health records systems. Is that a goal the Obama administration shares?

Dr. Blumenthal: The goal of the Obama administration is to improve health and health care in every possible way, to make it higher in quality, more efficient, deliver better value, empower consumers and patients. We look at health information technology as one enabler to accomplishing that goal.

I think in the previous administration, it had the tendency to become an end in itself. That's not how people in my office viewed it, but it stood out there in the absence of a larger health reform agenda. The objective of getting physicians and hospitals to use computers came to assume a value independent of what I think its real purpose is, which is to make doctors better doctors, hospitals better hospitals, consumers more informed purchasers, and the health care system better.

Much more here:

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/08/03/gvsa0803.htm

Useful interview from the US Health IT Czar!

This is also very useful.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/08/03/gvsb0803.htm

Guidelines on EHR meaningful use moving forward

The recommendations, which will help determine who receives federal stimulus funding, have been revised from an initial draft.

By Chris Silva, AMNews staff. Posted Aug. 3, 2009.

Last, and very usefully, we have:

EMRs must be viewed in a wider context

August 6, 2009 — 3:36pm ET | By Neil Versel

I stirred up no small amount of controversy last week when I took the pundit class to task for missing many of the issues related to EMRs and health IT, particularly since I took my most pointed shots at Bill O'Reilly and his colleagues at Fox News Channel. I got one email from an Alaska government employee requesting that we cancel his subscription. "I don't need another liberal no-nothing lecturing me on how to think!" the writer said.

OK, at the risk of sounding like a conservative no-nothing lecturing people on how to think, I'm going to criticize something that CNNMoney.com reported last Friday: how it's been a slow process for St. Elizabeth Healthcare in Kentucky to install and make interoperable an EMR for three hospitals and 43 clinics, a three-year effort projected to cost $80 million. More specifically, I'm going to take issue with the fact that CNN neglected to report what the payoff will be: 24/7 clinician and patient access to medical records, regardless of care setting; a reduction in duplicative tests; better care planning; streamlined appointment scheduling; and hopefully, a higher quality of care at lower cost.

This we learn only from Healthcare IT News, which lifted much of the information from an IBM press release. (This is an ironic development of itself, in that IBM's contract with St. Elizabeth is only worth $1.5 million, according to CNN. Epic Systems accounts for half the total $80 million pricetag.)

Much more here:

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/emrs-must-be-viewed-wider-context/2009-08-06?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Good stuff! All I can say is “Go Neil!”

There is an amazing amount happening. Enjoy!

David.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

I Wonder Will This Turn Out To Be A Problem for NEHTA and the IHI?

Australia is planning to introduce a single National Registration System for all Health Professionals. It is to be live and operational July 1, 2010

The web site for the project is found here:

http://www.nhwt.gov.au/natreg.asp

This provides the following background.

“The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) at its meeting of 26 March 2008 took a major step towards improving Australia’s health system by signing an Intergovernmental Agreement on the health workforce.

The new system will for the first time create a single national registration and accreditation system for ten health professions: chiropractors; dentists (including dental hygienists, dental prosthetists and dental therapists); medical practitioners; nurses and midwives; optometrists; osteopaths; pharmacists; physiotherapists; podiatrists; and psychologists. The new arrangement will help health professionals move around the country more easily, reduce red tape, provide greater safeguards for the public and promote a more flexible, responsive and sustainable health workforce. For example, the new scheme will maintain a public national register for each health profession that will ensure that a professional who has been banned from practising in one place is unable to practise elsewhere in Australia.”

The plan will actually impact of the order of 500,000 people who work in the total health sector.

What you may have missed are a few things relating to how this rather large change is going to relate to NEHTA’s plans to allocate each of these people, not only a provider ID number but also to issue a smartcard (or equivalent token) to enable the National Authentication Service for Health (NASH) which you can read about here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/component/docman/doc_download/490-national-authentication-service-for-health-overview

Also going live on July 1, 2010 is the National Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.

http://www.ahpra.gov.au/

The plans for how this is going to actually be achieved are found in a report entitled:

Preparing for commencement day AHPRA Establishment Plan 2009–10

The full document can be here:

http://www.ahpra.gov.au/documents/AHPRA%20Establishment%20Plan%202009-10%20June%202009.pdf

The section that most interested me of this document was this.

4.5 Information, Communications and Technology (ICT)

AHPRA will be dependent on technology to provide a national public register and to enable consistent national processes for registration and complaints in each of its State and Territory offices.

AHPRA will provide multiple channels of service delivery but will encourage uptake of online transactions wherever possible, including for renewal of registration.

AHPRA already has an ICT Strategy in place and an enterprise architecture covering the registration system, data migration, business systems, and infrastructure. Delivery of the ICT Strategy is oversighted by an ICT Reference Group comprised of representatives from existing registration bodies, State and Territory health departments and project staff. It is chaired by the Chief Executive of the South Australian Department of Health.

A new registration system has been selected and will be operational by March 2010.

Managing a smooth transition from current systems to the new system requires working collaboratively with State and Territory boards to remove duplicated registrations and cleanse data to avoid any errors being introduced into the new system, and to make sure information on the new system is accurate and up to date.

I was made aware of all this as I researched a brochure that arrived from my local registration authority – the NSW Medical Board. What I read on the cover follows.

NEW SOUTH WALES MEDICAL BOARD

Submission on Bill B

17 July 2009

INTRODUCTION

The New South Wales Medical Board (NSWMB) has supported the introduction of a system of National Registration of medical practitioners and has actively contributed to the debate.

The NSWMB considers that Bill B as it currently stands has touched on most of the major elements required of a system of professional regulation, but it has significant shortcomings in some areas, and without major amendment it will be inadequate for the purposes for which it is intended, and possibly unworkable. The Bill is overly prescriptive in some areas, while others where a degree of detail is necessary are very short on detail.

The Bill is particularly unsatisfactory in its approach to the critical matters of Conduct, Performance and Health, apparently misunderstanding the relationship between these major aspects of a NSWMB’s work, and proposing a system that is at the same time both cumbersome and inadequate.

The NSWMB notes that the NSW Government has indicated that it is likely to opt out of the Complaints provisions, and to the extent that this occurs, the NSWMB’s concerns regarding these provisions may not be relevant. However the NSWMB believes that insofar as it is possible, the legislation should represent best practice, and if it is amended to reflect this, there is a greater chance of NSW reversing the decision to opt out. Also, with movement of practitioners, the NSWMB will have to deal with the consequences of poor decisions made under inadequate provisions if Bill B is not rectified.

The NSWMB has made its views clear at the various forums at which an opportunity has been given to comment on Bill B, and it also notes in this regard that its concerns regarding the complaints handling system have been echoed by all other Medical Boards and apparently by a substantial number of other professional Boards as well.

Finally, the NSWMB is pleased to note that its concerns about Bill B have been listened to carefully by the NRAIP staff responsible for developing the next version, and it is hopeful that many of the issues raised by it and other bodies during the consultation process will be understood and taken into account in the next version.

NRAIP has indicated that there will be no further public consultation when the next draft of the legislation is developed. The NSWMB believes that in a matter as critical as this where legislation is being developed that will set the course for the regulation of health professions in Australia into the future, it is vital that more time is taken to get it right, rather than adhering to deadlines set several years ago which are becoming increasingly unrealistic. Serious consideration must be given to allowing a further round of consultation so that the new system gets off to a sound start, with the commitment of those who will be participating in it strengthened by the knowledge that it is a good system, rather than one that has been finalised in haste to meet artificially imposed deadlines.

This text is found here:

http://www.nhwt.gov.au/documents/National%20Registration%20and%20Accreditation/Bill%20B%20Submissions/N/New%20South%20Wales%20Medical%20Board.pdf

Browsing around I also found this

TENDER APPROVED FOR NATIONAL REGISTRATION SYSTEM

PROJECT UPDATE

JUNE 2009

Eclipse Pty Ltd has been awarded the contract to supply and implement the registration system for the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the Health Professions.

Eclipse is an Australian company, part of the UXC group. The software product that they will provide is ‘Pivotal’, a case management system based on the Microsoft.NET platform. The company has expertise in delivering the product within registration and complaint handling environments.

The selection panel, which included two CEOs of current registration boards, was impressed by the large number and quality of responses to the tender. The panel viewed demonstrations and undertook site visits to confirm the ability of the chosen system to perform in relation to registration and complaint functionality.

The new system will be delivered to allow training to commence in March 2010 and full operation from 1 July 2010.

Detailed design will commence in July 2009. The implementation team will ensure that the design of the new system is reviewed by staff from current State and Territory boards.

Louise Morauta

Project Director

June 2009

Source:

http://www.nhwt.gov.au/documents/National%20Registration%20and%20Accreditation/Tender%20approved%20for%20national%20registation%20system%20-%20June%202009.pdf

So what it seems we have here is:

1. At least one Medical Board – the biggest – not exactly happy with planned legislation

2. The need to establish a major system managing the Identity and Credential details for 500,000 people.

3. NEHTA planning to use this and the source data-bases from each of the States to issue identifiers and secure tokens to all these people.

Given the system to manage this is not to commence being trained upon until March 2010 I suspect the risk of delay and chaos is not zero!

The chance of having all health providers having the appropriate ID and tokens so the IHI systems can go operational on July 1 next year must also be put at somewhat less than 100%.

David.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

I Wonder Why the Federal Privacy Commissioner is Not Insisting That NEHTA release the Privacy Impact Assessments for the NEHTA IHI?

The following appeared a few days ago.

Debate needed on patient records

Karen Dearne | August 04, 2009

CONSUMER groups frustrated by the slow pace on e-health are forming a coalition to pressure the federal government to release secret documents and engage in an open debate over plans for a national patient record-sharing system.

The Consumer-Centred E-Health Coalition is a response to "government secrecy and lack of consultation" launched by the Australian Privacy Foundation, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Cancer Voices and the University of NSW's Cyberspace Policy and Law Centre.

Their outrage was sparked by the narrow focus and limited opportunity to comment on the Healthcare Identifiers and Privacy discussion paper -- key components of a broad e-health rollout, says convener Juanita Fernando, chairwoman of the APF's health committee.

In particular, they are demanding the release of two Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) -- the first produced in 2006 and the second completed earlier this year -- to provide broader insight into the issues canvassed.

"The main issue is the lack of information," Dr Fernando said. "Despite years of work, millions of dollars spent and many consultations, including with consumer groups, most of the reports and findings have been set aside.

"Why are they hidden from public scrutiny? All government-held information and assessments of e-health implementations should be available to underpin public debate. Then we can finally start making progress towards implementing e-health."

With the $98 million Unique Healthcare Identifier program due to start next year, the discussion paper proposes quick fixes to overcome legal obstacles in the short term, while promising wider consultation down the track.

.....

Privacy fears allayed in moves to federal e-health

FEDERAL Privacy Commissioner Karen Curtis says individual healthcare identifiers could be assigned to Australians ahead of wider health privacy reform.

"My office notes that the issuing of IHIs by themselves does not create a national framework for an electronic health record; rather it is one of the building blocks towards that very important public policy initiative," Ms Curtis said.

"With appropriate safeguards in place, IHIs could be issued ahead of the broader reform."

Ms Curtis said national consistency in privacy laws was being considered by the federal government in response to the Australian Law Reform Commission's recent report.

Meanwhile, Ms Curtis's office was preparing a submission on the current identifiers discussion paper. "We would expect that the Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council will conduct a further comprehensive consultation prior to the introduction of an e-health record framework," she said.

Ms Curtis rejected concerns that consumers were being excluded and said government agencies were "encouraged" to undertake and publish privacy impact assessments.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25876770-5013040,00.html

It was quickly followed by the following.

Secret report reveals e-health ID findings

Karen Dearne | August 04, 2009

INDIVIDUAL healthcare identifiers are likely to be seen as a new national identity number, sparking considerable community concern, according to an unpublished privacy impact assessment (PIA) conducted by Galexia in 2006.

"Apart from the Tax File Number and proposals for actual national ID cards - the Australia card in 1985-87 and the Health and Welfare Access card in 2005-06 - the IHI is the most significant proposal for a comprehensive national identification product," the consultancy firm warns in a document obtained by The Australian.

"In these circumstances, it is likely that the only way to manage community expectations is to consider strengthening the limits on the use of the IHI, by prohibiting its use outside the health sector in specific legislation."

The PIA, prepared for the National E-Health Transition Authority, is one of two such reports being sought by consumer advocates as they respond to a health ministers' discussion paper, Healthcare Identifiers and Privacy, which proposes an early start to an IHI rollout.

Galexia pointed to the legal obstacles prohibiting the use of Medicare numbers for other purposes, and warned of "significant privacy compliance hurdles" arising from the proposed use of Medicare's Consumer Directory Management System as a source for individual numbers.

.....

Federal Privacy Commissioner Karen Curtis yesterday told The Australian that individual identifiers could be assigned to Australians ahead of the broad health privacy reform recommended by the Australian Law Reform Commission and under federal government consideration.

Consumer and privacy advocates say there can be no progress on e-health adoption without resolution of the key privacy, consent, security and governance arrangements.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25880888-15306,00.html

I have consistently been impressed with the command of the e-Health domain that has been demonstrated by the Federal Privacy Commissioner’s office under Ms Curtis’s leadership.

See here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2007/09/vale-access-card-dead-as-dodo.html

and here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/07/useful-and-interesting-health-it-news.html

and so I am quite curious to understand why she is not demanding access to all the relevant work undertaken by NEHTA and Department of Health as part of preparing her submission on the proposed legislation.

Even more I would like to also be able to see their assessments!

I have been a minor contributor to a submission from the Australian College of Health Informatics on the proposed legislation around the NEHTA IHI proposal and have made the point there, as in earlier blogs, that reviewing proposed legislation in an information vacuum is just a waste of time – or worse. This all has the feel of being asked to comment on shape and nature of an elephant by being shown a single tusk!

(Note you still have a day or so to make your own submission. Closes August 14. See here:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pacd-ehealth-consultation)

I am really looking forward to what the Federal Privacy Commissioner has to say in her submission and I really hope it reveals she, at least, has had access to all the information she needed. For that not to have been so makes the consultation process a double travesty!

David.

Monday, August 10, 2009

The Reasons to Attend the HIC 09 Conference are Compelling!

The HIC 09 Conference is being held in Canberra between August 19 and 21, 2009.

The conference web site is found here:

http://www.hisa.org.au/hic09

In a series of posts over the next two weeks I want to highlight some of the goodies on offer, and encourage you to attend if you possibly can.

All the details and registration is available on the link above.

Alert 4.

The Reasons to Attend are Compelling

There are two major reasons to make a last minute decision to attend HIC'09 in Canberra next week.

There are increasing signs that the Federal Government will substantially fund the proposals coming out of the NHHRC report. If that is the case, then it is critical that you attend HIC'09 to understand how to best position yourself or your organisation to fully participate in this fundamental change to Australian healthcare.

The second reason is that HIC'09 will be the first opportunity to hear the outcomes of HISA's two major studies. The first on the Australian health informatics workforce has been a mammoth activity with over 1200 healthcare professionals responding. This study gives a deep insight into the Australian health informatics workforce and the issues that need to be addressed to prepare Australia for the implementation of the proposed e-Health strategy.

The second survey is a detailed response to the Individual Health Identifier discussion paper released by the Department of Health and Aging. The nature of the health privacy regulation being developed will have a deep and lasting impact on how e-health is managed in Australia. It is important that you understand these issues and attending HIC'09 is the simplest and most effective way of doing this.

The need for you to attend is compelling, from a financial, policy or practice point of view, HIC'09 is the conference you must get to in 2009. Register now!

You can’t miss it!

David.

I Hope an Obvious Source of Funding for E-Health Is Actually Deployed.

The following appeared a few days ago.

E-health plans could be paid for by future fund

Siobhain Ryan | August 07, 2009

Article from: The Australian

THE expensive e-health ambitions of Canberra, from personal electronic health records to online consultations, could be bankrolled from the leftover $1.8 billion in the "nation-building" Health and Hospitals Fund.

Bill Ferris, chairman of the fund's advisory board, has backed the creation of electronic health records as "essential" to improving Australia's health system. "If we fund everything else and not this, it might result in lots of shiny engines and carriages rattling along different gauge health system tracks across the nation."

The shift away from paper-based records was one of the "obvious capital funding demands" that could be made of the fund, Mr Ferris noted. However, he made clear he was expressing his personal views and not those of the board or government. His first public statements on possible funding priorities come after Kevin Rudd's hand-picked health adviser last month threw its substantial weight behind a $1.1bn to $1.8bn plan to create an electronic health record for every Australian by 2012.

Progress towards digitising medical records, assigning them unique identifiers and giving patients control of the information has been slow, despite near unanimity about e-health's value in improving communication between health workers and reducing life-threatening mistakes.

Electronic prescribing and internet consultations are also no closer to reality, despite past Council of Australian Governments spending of $318 million on e-health projects.

The Prime Minister has given himself six months to respond to National Health and Hospital Reform Commission recommendations on e-health and other reforms. Mr Rudd has already warned that his cash-strapped government will not be able to finance all of the commission's proposals and will look for fresh savings to offset new spending.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25894686-23289,00.html

This possibility was first flagged on the blog about 8 months ago. See here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2008/12/health-and-hospitals-fund-announcement.html

The key issue that will arise if indeed the funds are made available it that they be spent very carefully and wisely.

I think it would be fair to say there will only be one chance to get access to a sum of this scale to try and get Australian e-Health rolling, so we need to proceed calmly and deliberately.

In this spirit it seems to me to be vital we make sure we have the visionary leadership and appropriate and highly competent governance. It will also be critical to effectively communicate with the public, government and industry about goals, objectives, plans and evaluation of what is being done and why.

The way the e-Health initiative in Ontario went off the rails should be warning enough that considerable care is required!

See here for the grisly details:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/06/amazing-goings-on-in-e-health-in.html

My personal preference would be that the funds be made available to an entity which was established by legislation with very clear cut roles, responsibilities and authority and that it report to the Australian Health Ministers Council who would be advised by an appropriately expert board (mixing technical, health sector, planning and commercial skills).

As recommended in the Deloittes National e-Health Strategy I would be keen to see this entity absorb NEHTA, while continuing the important ongoing functions and funding from NEHTA, and at the same time adding the capabilities needed for the larger task. I DO NOT see any place for handing the extra money to NEHTA and just hoping for the best!

The leadership group to progress this vital task will be absolutely critical and there will need to be great care taken to select the right people. (Essential will be in depth understanding of both the health system and where technology fits and a clear recognition that e-Health in not an end in itself but an enabler of improved safety and efficiency. Clearly there will also need to be highly developed capabilities in areas such as project management, public administration, government relations, stakeholder communication etc.)

I am pretty sure this will need to be a team – just one leader to do all this may just be too big an ask!

I look forward to being able to wonder just what the team might be who can deliver all this when the funds are nailed!

David.

Sunday, August 09, 2009

Useful and Interesting Health IT News from the Last Week – 09/08/2009.

The Australian E-Health Press provided a good serve this week. It included these:

First we have:

Plan to link rebate access to GPs’ e-health capability

Elizabeth McIntosh - Friday, 7 August 2009

DOCTORS have welcomed the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) report’s e-health recommendations, but have questioned the intent of linking Medicare rebates to e-health capabilities.

The e-health proposals, which cost an estimated $1.8 billion, include person-controlled electronic health records for all Australians by 2012.

However, the NHHRC also called on the Government to mandate that payments for health and aged care services should eventually be dependent on the provider’s ability to transmit information to a patient’s personal e-health record, and to other health providers.

.....

But AMA e-health committee chair Dr Peter Garcia-Webb believed the proposal would not have a significant impact on general practice.

“General practice has taken huge strides in becoming electronic,” he said.

“There needs to be some thought to encourage e-health [among specialists].”

What was now needed was an overarching e-health framework and direction, he said.

.....

More here (subscription required):

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/News/0,1734,5031,07200908.aspx

I am not quite sure where the AMA is coming from here. They seem to think this awful plan to force GPs and Specialists to send private patient information off to some undefined PHR in the sky is a good thing and that a overarching e-health framework and direction is needed. Yohoo! We have a framework (The Deloittes Strategy as recommended by AHMAC and the NHHRC) and we really need to actually start planning to implement and fund it – not just continue the navel gazing. The development of PHRs is towards the end of the priority list – we have a few other things to sort out first!

Second we have:

Pharmacy condemns codeine decision

6 August 2009 | by Simone Roberts

Tighter controls on over-the-counter codeine combinations will not address the problem of misuse of the products and will put significant pressure on pharmacists, say the profession's peak bodies.

Both the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (PSA) have expressed disappointment with the National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee (NDPSC) decision to upschedule OTC combination analgesics containing codeine (CACC) to Schedule 3 in a bid to address concerns of misuse and abuse of the products.

The Guild said the scheduling changes would only mask the problem and were unlikely to influence individual misuse behaviour.

It said it was regrettable that the committee rejected its proposal to adopt real-time monitoring and reporting of these products through its NotifyRx technology, calling it a "missed opportunity".

"This technology underpins the extremely successful Project STOP which has done so much to prevent the illegal diversion of pseudoephedrine," the Guild said in a statement.

More here:

http://www.pharmacynews.com.au/article/pharmacy-condemns-codeine-decision/493427.aspx

I really wonder where we are going with all this. We have the Guild pushing a technology solution to what I have to say I see as a real ‘non-problem’. Looking at the reasons for all this it is very hard to actually see the obvious statistic – what proportion of those who take these medications do so irresponsibly (i.e. is this really substantial problem?) and what is the evidence that what is proposed here will make a difference? I could not find that basic piece of information. Given Panadeine and similar have been available easily for the whole of my adult life (40+ years) one really wonders what has suddenly changed.

Third we have:

Alarm grows over high CT radiation

Adam Cresswell, Health editor | August 08, 2009

Article from: The Australian

THE amount of cancer-causing radiation exposure in CT scans can vary fourfold or more with different machines, even when identical tests are performed, radiology experts say.

After two separate warnings this week that some doctors appear to be ordering high-radiation CT scans inappropriately, the federal government's radiation watchdog said calibration discrepancies might be further increasing the unnecessary dose of X-rays some patients received.

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, which monitors the exposure of the population to medical and other sources of radiation, said it was working with professional groups to set benchmarks to guide how much radiation patients should receive for particular tests.

The agency's acting chief executive, Peter Burns, said there could be large variations in radiation output for some procedures. "It can vary by about three or four times ... for the same procedure," he said.

The National Prescribing Service journal Australian Prescriber this week published a paper warning of widespread overuse of chest CT scans, which expose patients to 400 times more ionising radiation than a plain X-ray.

A report in The Australian prompted the Medicare watchdog to say it was "horrified" at apparently unnecessary CT scans being ordered.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25899092-23289,00.html

Not quite Health IT, but certainly Health Technology and it certainly needs to be used carefully used. The obvious solution is, of course, to use MRI and not CT scans in those at risk of getting any significant radiation dosage as MRI is radiation free and can get similar (if not better) images. Pity they are a bit more expensive.

Fourth we have:

Secret surgery waiting lists exposed

Article from Sunday Mail

BRAD CROUCH

August 09, 2009 12:01am

THOUSANDS of people are languishing for years on a hidden waiting list for elective surgery, despite State Government boasts of a 98.5 per cent reduction in overdue elective surgery lists.

While Government figures show only 32 patients were on official overdue waiting lists at the end of June, the unofficial list shows some people have been waiting a decade just to see a specialist before they even make it onto the official lists.

The revelation comes as the Sunday Mail confirms:

SENIOR doctors have written a protest letter over a move allowing Health Department employees other than clinicians to reassign patients to less urgent categories - with longer acceptable waiting periods for surgery - without being seen by a doctor.

PATIENTS with serious elective surgery conditions, including a woman with only one eye which needed surgery, were moved to lower priority categories in late June, allowing the Government to meet ambitious end-of-financial-year targets.

SPECIALISTS have signed a letter expressing grave concern about the "negative impact the overwhelming focus on elective surgery is having on both outpatient follow-up and emergency surgery".

Full article here:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,27574,25901723-2682,00.html

Is it really is hard to understand why it is impossible to keep track of waiting lists? No! It is in incumbent Government’s interests to muddy and confuse waiting list information to avoid any real political scrutiny. Sad about that!

Fifth we have:

Reversal on doctor register

Siobhain Ryan | August 08, 2009

Article from: The Australian

CANBERRA will be forced to make further changes to a national scheme cracking down on rogue health workers after it struck resistance from a key health union and was found wanting by ALP backbenchers.

A Labor-led Senate committee has recommended that a draft bill to register and accredit hundreds of thousands of health professionals be amended to curb ministers' powers and make their decisions more transparent.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25899017-23289,00.html

I wonder how this legislation will relate to the proposed IHI legislation at covers health care providers.

Sixth we have:

Commentary

12:51 PM, 7 Aug 2009

Stephen Bartholomeusz

The NBN number crunch

Now that the board of the new National Broadband Network company, NBN Co, has been assembled, the moment of truth is nearing. There is little prospect that NBN Co can be financially sustainable on a standalone basis, which means the original concept of a giant public/private partnership will founder without massive and ongoing government subsidies.

The telecommunications team at Goldman Sachs JB Were has just released a major (92-page) report on the NBN. They estimate it will cost $37 billion to build – $41 billion if Telstra isn’t prepared to sell the ducts, pits and pipe that constitute the most strategic element of its ‘last mile’ network to NBN at a 33 per cent discount to the analysts’ $12 billion valuation – but be worth negative $9 billion in net present value terms.

As they conclude, ‘’it is difficult to see the market ascribing any value to an equity investment in a company such as this.’’

On their forecasts NBN Co won’t be free cash flow positive until 2025.

They argue that Telstra will be prepared to sell its passive infrastructure to NBN Co for $8 billion – a $4 billion discount to its assessed value – to demonstrate that it is a good corporate citizen (and presumably to try to avoid regulatory punishment for non-cooperation).

Telstra would also significantly reduce its maintenance capital expenditures and selling its assets to NBN Co would avert the threat that the NBN would ’go aerial’ and, in the longer term, leave Telstra’s existing network intact but eventually obsolete.

However, the Goldman analysts don’t believe Telstra will accept equity in NBN Co as consideration, given their view of its equity value. They believe it will be politically unpalatable for the government to pay cash for the assets, saying the most likely outcome was a mixture of cash, the transfer of some Telstra debt, and some kind of annuity stream.

More here:

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/The-NBN-number-crunch-pd20090807-UP4YJ?OpenDocument&src=sph

It is interesting just how long it is going to take to make this actually make some of its cost back. I sure hope the intangible and economic benefits flow before then!

There is more on the NBN here:

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/pmx2019s-national-broadband-plan-really-is-no-net-gain-20090802-e5re.html

PM’s national broadband plan really is no net gain

Chris Berg

A libertarian view asking if this maybe could be better thought out. The major consulting report on all this that is planned will be interesting when released.

See here:

http://business.watoday.com.au/business/mckinsey-wins-big-broadband-role-20090806-ebin.html

McKinsey wins big broadband role

Ari Sharp

August 6, 2009

CONSULTANT McKinsey & Company has emerged as a major part of the next phase of the national broadband network (NBN), snaring a role as joint lead adviser for the project's implementation study and having two of its former partners join the board.

Lastly the slightly more technical article for the week:

KDE 4.3 released for a ‘greatly’ improved experience

Functionality and usability combine for highly anticipated upgrade

Rodney Gedda 05 August, 2009 09:06

After six months of development the KDE project has released the most anticipated upgrade of the KDE 4 series, KDE 4.3, which promises to greatly improve the overall user experience of the open source desktop environment.

KDE 4.3, codenamed “Caizen”, has had the goal “polish, polish, polish”, according to its developers, who were scorned for beginning the KDE 4 series with a basic 4.0 release that did not have all the features of the 3.5.x predecessors.

With this release being the fourth of the KDE 4 series, the momentum and pace of development is definitely increasing with some 2000 feature requests implemented in the past six months alone.

Other statistics from development team indicate 10,000 bugs fixed and approximately 63,000 changes committed by nearly 700 contributors since 4.2.

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/313796/kde_4_3_released_greatly_improved_experience?eid=-6787

It is astonishing just the amount of work that gets done in these major open-source projects.

See the results here:

http://www.kde.org/screenshots/kde350shots.php

Windows is really going to have to try very hard indeed to stay ahead!

More next week.

David.

Friday, August 07, 2009

Report and Resource Watch – Week of 03, August, 2009

Just an occasional post when I come upon a few interesting reports and resources that are worth a download or browse. This week we have a few.

First we have:

Quality down for non-QoF care

27 Jul 2009

The Quality and Outcomes Framework has led to a reduction in the quality of care for activities not included in the QoF and had a negative impact on continuity of care, according to a new study.

Researchers from the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre in Manchester looked at the quality of care in 42 GP practices in 1998 and 2003, before the QoF was launched, and in 2005 and 2007 following implementation of the framework.

The analysis examined care of patients with asthma, diabetes or coronary heart disease using data extracted from medical records and data from patients’ questionnaires on access to care, continuity of care and interpersonal aspects of care.

The results, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed that there were significant improvements in care provided for the three major diseases between 1998 and 2007 with the rate of improvement accelerating for asthma and diabetes after the introduction of the QoF.

However the rate of improvement slowed after 2005 for all three conditions and the quality of aspects of care not associated with an incentive in the QoF declined for patients with asthma or heart disease. Continuity of care also immediately declined after the introduction of the pay-for-performance scheme and then continued at that reduced level.

Much more here :

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5062/quality_down_for_non-qof_care

The full paper can be found here:

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/reprint/361/4/368.pdf

This is critical stuff that needs to be carefully reviewed and considered in the design of any ‘pay for performance’ incentive program.

The last paragraph of the discussion says it all.

“In conclusion, between 1998 and 2007, there were significant improvements in measurable aspects of clinical performance with respect to the care provided for three major chronic diseases. The initial acceleration in the underlying rate of quality improvement after the introduction of pay for performance was not sustained. If the aim of pay for performance is to give providers incentives to attain targets, the scheme achieved that aim. There may have been unintended consequences, including reductions in the quality of some aspects of care not linked to incentives and in the continuity of care.”

One line summary – “Provide incentives for the behaviour you want! It will work, but be careful what you leave out!”

Second we have:

Some 45,000 docs eligible for EHR subsidies: study

Posted: July 27, 2009 - 5:59 am EDT

Researchers at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services estimate that as many as 45,000 physicians are eligible to receive up to $63,750 in Medicaid subsidy payments for the purchase and use of electronic health-record systems under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. If all of the Medicaid-eligible physicians receive the maximum payments, the researchers conclude, taxpayers will invest more than $2.8 billion in the EHR subsidy program.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090727/MODERNPHYSICIAN/307269983

The report is found here:

http://www.gwumc.edu/sphhs/departments/healthpolicy/dhp_publications/pub_uploads/dhpPublication_506602E1-5056-9D20-3D7DD946F604FDEE.pdf

This is certainly a serious level of investment in getting EHRs in place.

Third we have:

Study Finds Electronic Health Records Not Ready for Genetic Information

  • Jul 24, 2009

Current electronic health records (EHRs) have a long way to go to meet the challenges of genetic/genomic medicine, reports a study in the July issue of Genetics in Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of The American College of Medical Genetics.

Although EHR systems have the potential to help integrate genetic information into everyday health care, they'll need new structure, standardization, and functionality to meet this goal, according to the new study led by Dr. Maren Scheuner of RAND Corp., Santa Monica, Calif. The researchers interviewed medical geneticists, genetic counselors, primary care doctors, and EHR vendors and specialists regarding the present and future role of EHRs in storing and using genetic information.

State-of-the-art EHRs lack the features needed even to record genetic information in a systematic way--much less use it in medical decision making, the responses indicated. While current EHR systems provide space for information on the patient's family history, there were limitations on how the information could be entered and used. For example, few systems were able to create or store a pedigree charting the inheritance of genetic conditions within families. EHRs provided little clinical decision support to help doctors assess the risk of genetic diseases or provide treatment alerts based on the family history. Systems also varied in the way they handled the security of genetic test results.

More here:

http://ohsonline.com/articles/2009/07/24/study-finds-electronic-health-records-not-ready-for-genetic-information.aspx

The abstract for the paper is here:

http://journals.lww.com/geneticsinmedicine/Abstract/2009/07000/Are_electronic_health_records_ready_for_genomic.5.aspx

It is important that these issues be carefully addressed as we move forward.

Fourth we have:

States Look to Electronic Prescribing to Move Toward a More Efficient Health Care System

NGA Center Issue Brief Highlights State Actions to Achieve a Higher Quality Health Care System Contact: Krista Zaharias, 202-624-5367

Office of Communications

Accelerating the Adoption of Electronic Prescribing

WASHINGTON—States are using innovative strategies to address the issue of integrated electronic health records and the electronic exchange of health information, according to a new Issue Brief from the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center).

Accelerating the Adoption of Electronic Prescribing examines electronic prescribing, or e-prescribing—the computer-based electronic generation and transmission of a prescription. E-prescribing improves patient safety and quality of care, increases prescribing accuracy and efficiency and reduces health care costs by making critical information available to health care providers. The use of e-prescribing will grow as states and others provide support for e-prescribing. In recent years, states annually have doubled the number of prescriptions sent electronically. If states stay the course, this rate of adoption will reach at least 50 percent by 2012, according to State Alliance for e-Health Call to Action for NGA.

More here:

http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.6c9a8a9ebc6ae07eee28aca9501010a0/?vgnextoid=72b26bc7a7cb2210VgnVCM1000005e00100aRCRD&vgnextchannel=6d4c8aaa2ebbff00VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD

The report link is in the text

Good to see the pressure is building in this area.

Fifth we have:

Defense, VA halfway to full EHR interoperability: GAO

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: July 29, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

The healthcare organizations of the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments have met three of six objectives toward achieving what they have self-defined as “full interoperability” between their respective electronic health-records systems and “partially achieved planned capabilities” in the other three. However, those and the joint management program overseeing the project still need “additional work” to meet a Sept. 30 deadline, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The congressional watchdog, in a 35-page report, said the DOD/VA Interagency Program Office “is not yet effectively positioned to function as a single point of accountability for the implementation of fully interoperable EHR systems or capabilities between DOD and VA.”
More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090729/REG/307299987

The link to the report is in the article.

Seems like a little way to go – but this is not an easy issue to address with two complex legacy systems.

Sixth we have

Prevention and Health Promotion Could Save Medicare $1.4 Trillion Over 10 Years

Les Masterson, for HealthLeaders Media, July 30, 2009

Government health promotion and prevention programs for pre-Medicare and Medicare populations could save the country as much as $1.4 trillion over 10 years—and add on average as many as 6 years on Medicare beneficiaries' lives, according to a new Center for Health Research at Healthways report.

Today's report, Potential Medicare Savings Through Prevention & Health Risk Reduction, found that focusing on programs that keep people healthy and reduce health risk factors, and manage chronic conditions—before and during Medicare eligibility—can have long-term cost savings. In fact, though these programs could extend beneficiaries' lives, the researchers found the cost savings associated with keeping people healthier would offset the extra years of life and coverage expenses that the federal government would have to pay for under Medicare.

"In this report, we clearly showed that you can, in fact, reduce risk and this does increase life expectancy, but you can still achieve savings over the course of a lifetime," says Elizabeth Rula, PhD, lead researcher at the CHR.

With baby boomers reaching Medicare age, the Medicare population is expected to jump from 45 million to nearly 80 million by 2030. Couple that fact with the healthcare reform debate in Washington and one can see why healthcare thought leaders and policymakers are searching for programs and savings to bend the healthcare cost curve.

Much more here:

http://healthplans.hcpro.com/content.cfm?content_id=236758&topic=WS_HLM2_HEP

Link to report in text.

Ms Roxon needs to read this one closely!

Lastly we have:

Most states monitoring diseases electronically: CDC

By Jean DerGurahian / HITS staff writer

Posted: July 30, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Most states have operational electronic disease-surveillance systems and are using a combination of systems to conduct disease surveillance and report public health information to the federal government, according to a status report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In its weekly morbidity and mortality report, the CDC released findings from a 2007 survey it conducted to assess the progress states were making in developing electronic surveillance systems. Most states are using a mix of vendor information technology products, state-developed systems and the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System supported by the CDC to monitor diseases, the CDC said in its report. “State electronic disease surveillance systems varied widely and were in various stages of implementation,” according to the report.

More here (registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090730/REG/307309989

The report is in the text.

I wonder how close we would be to the status found here?

Enough goodies for one week!

Enjoy!

David.

Thursday, August 06, 2009

HIC 09 – Australia’s Peak E-Health Conference – Alert Number 3

The HIC 09 Conference is being held in Canberra between August 19 and 21, 2009.

The conference web site is found here:

http://www.hisa.org.au/hic09

In a series of posts over the next two weeks I want to highlight some of the goodies on offer, and encourage you to attend if you possibly can.

All the details and registration is available on the link above.

Alert 3.

The NHHRC Report has Changed the e-Health Landscape

The next 6 months are going to see a lot of interaction between the government and the health section as the response to NHHRC report is developed. If you want to participate in these discussions, or just be better placed to react to the outcomes, you need to be attend HIC09. HIC'09 represents your best opportunity to quickly gain the knowledge and personal networks to be more effective in supporting the effective delivery of our next generation of healthcare.

Call HISA on 03-9388-0555 if you have any questions about HIC'09.

It will be fun!

Be there!

David.