Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, July 09, 2010

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 7 July, 2010.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or payment.
-----

Improving the Quality and Cost of Healthcare Delivery

The Potential of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology

By: Anna-Marie Vilamovska
This study investigates whether an upcoming class of health information technology (HIT) can be used to address currently outstanding issues in the quality and cost of healthcare delivery. Expert interviews and a literature review were used to describe the 2009 universe of in- and outpatient healthcare RFID applications and to identify those applications expected to have the largest positive impact on the quality and cost-effectiveness of healthcare delivery over the next five to ten years. Next, case studies of actual RFID implementations across seven hospital sites in the U.S. and Europe were conducted to gain an understanding of how each leading RFID application type creates value, what aspects of care it impacts, and what the critical factors driving the promising RFID’s organizational benefits and costs are. As part of this work, an original set of healthcare RFID cost-benefit evaluation tools was developed and tested. The study’s findings indicate that in contrast to other types of HIT, the majority of benefits associated with successful RFID implementation are directly related to money saved (occurring as direct capital and operational cost savings), and that select RFID applications can substantially impact both the cost (e.g., efficiency) and the quality (e.g., timeliness, capacity for continuous improvement) of care delivery. Critical challenges for RFID adoption are described.
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
-----
Monday, June 28, 2010

Patient Engagement in Health IT Efforts Could Be Crucial

At the Health 2.0 conference earlier this month in Washington, D.C., several patient advocates stressed the need to include patients in federal health IT efforts.
Trisha Torrey, who writes the Every Patient's Advocate Blog, noted that many of the policy terms thrown around by the health IT community, like "HITECH" and "meaningful use," are meaningless to patients.
A day later, a survey -- conducted by Harris Interactive for the Xerox Corporation -- was released, finding that only 16% of U.S. adults with a health care provider or institution said they have been approached by that provider or institution to discuss converting to electronic health records.  The survey also found that respondents ranked patients as last among groups to benefit from EHRs, with 26% reporting that patients have the least to gain from EHR adoption.
-----

Possibility of National Electronic Medical Records System Growing

By Andy Opsahl
In San Francisco, Accenture recently hosted the last of its three town hall meetings gauging citizen views on health-care challenges and solutions in partnership with the Council for Excellence in Government. The other two meetings occurred in Miami and Detroit. As health-care costs and the number of uninsured citizens climb, some form of government-supported universal health coverage is becoming more likely in the United States, according to panelists at the San Francisco meeting.
Universal health coverage could make a national electronic medical record (EMR) infrastructure critical to managing such a massive, complex health-care system. A national move to EMRs would create new business opportunities for the IT industry. These gatherings allowed Accenture to test the waters of citizen receptivity to a national EMR system. Meeting attendees have been surprisingly open to the EMR idea, said Ken Dineen, global managing director of Accenture’s health industry practice. The company’s polling data showed 79 percent support for EMR among Miami citizens, 59 percent in Detroit and 74 percent in San Francisco. Privacy and security concerns about such a system fuel the usual objections.
-----

More IT outreach needed: eHealth Initiative

Posted: July 2, 2010 - 12:15 pm ET
Electronic healthcare initiatives have made headway over the last several years, but health information technology remains an undervalued tool, a new report concludes.
The National Progress Report on eHealth, 2010, released July 1 by the not-for-profit, Washington-based eHealth Initiative, found that significant progress in health IT has been made over the past three years. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is cited as a key driver of progress.
However, challenges remain, said Jennifer Covich Bordenick, CEO of the eHealth Initiative, in a written statement. "Coordinating public- and private-sector efforts and communicating the true value of HIT and HIE to consumers will be critical as we move forward," she noted.
-----

20,000 SCRs viewed via Adastra system

29 Jun 2010
More than 20,000 Summary Care Records have been viewed out-of-hours via the integrated solution provided by software supplier Adastra.
The company said the figures covered viewings at the three early adopter sites in Bolton, Bury and Medway, where SCRs are available for the majority of the population.
Dr Alex Yeates, medical director for Adastra, said the 20,000th viewing was recorded over the weekend by a doctor working at night in one of the three centres.
He told EHI Primary Care: “Although it’s only a number, it is a milestone which shows that in these three areas it is now becoming normal to have that record available and to view it when needed.”
-----

“Slow and steady” may not be so bad

By Jeff Rowe, Editor
Given the variety of kinks that still need to be worked out of emerging systems, is it really such a bad thing that the public is slow in understanding the potential benefits of HIT?
 That’s the question that came to mind as we skimmed through the results of the most recent Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll that looked at American’s understanding of their physician’s IT capabilities.
According to the press release announcing the poll, “despite years of hype around the issue, less than one in 10 American adults now utilize electronic medical records or turn to e-mail to contact their doctor.”
-----

Children’s Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 Improves Patient Safety with Cerner Health Information Technology Solutions

Published Today - 08:51 GMT
The Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 (CCHE) has successfully gone live with state-of-the-art healthcare information technology (HIT) solutions from Cerner Corporation. More than 700 clinicians and staff are using Cerner Millennium® solutions to provide superior care and improve patient safety for cancer patients at Egypt's leading pediatric cancer hospital. The Cerner® electronic health record (EHR) is the Single Source of Truth™ for accurate patient information, including allergies, the latest diagnostic results and accurate patient weight at the point of care so that CCHE caregivers can safeguard their pediatric patients. CCHF implemented Cerner technology to help ensure safety and reliability in the delicate process of caring for pediatric cancer patients.
-----

Health Reform Presents I.T. Challenges Big and Small

By Joseph Goedert
Health Data Management Magazine, 07/01/2010
You can't say the first 18 months of the Obama administration have been boring for the health I.T. industry.
The administration kicked things off with the HITECH Act and its health records, health information exchange and privacy/security provisions. I.T. executives' plates were pushed to overflowing with implementation of the HIPAA 5010 transaction sets and ICD-10 code sets, and the annual modifications to Medicare and Medicaid policies and payments.
The federal government now has served up the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as the health care reform law, also frequently referred to by both proponents and critics as ObamaCare.
Health Data Management's June and May issues covered several new reform-related challenges, including new "operating rules" to further standardize HIPAA transactions, electronic enrollment for public health and human services programs, lower Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements, and demonstration programs to better coordinate care and adopt best practices.
-----

Royal Free builds Cerner checklists

30 Jun 2010
The Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust has developed a fully auditable set of guidelines and actions for clinicians within its Cerner Millennium electronic patient record system.
The trust has been working with Cerner and the BMJ Evidence Centre to pilot a standardised checklist of actions to help clinicians make the best decisions for patients with gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding.
-----

CIOs: We Won't Meet MU in Time

HDM Breaking News, June 29, 2010
A survey of 120 hospital CIOs finds that half believe their organization will meet the first set of electronic health records meaningful use criteria in time to get incentive payments in 2011, and a full 80 percent worry about being able to meet expanded criteria in 2015.
Later stage criteria that is worrisome includes using advanced decision support, providing and populating personal health records, and improving health outcomes through data exchange with outside organizations.
New York-based consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP surveyed the CIOs, all members of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives, during the second quarter of 2010. The firm also conducted in-depth interviews with 14 CIOs or leaders of delivery systems, health information exchanges, insurers and regional extension centers.
-----

Hospital CIOs confused over e-health records rollout standards

Lack of clarity about government rules slowing efforts, survey says

Lucas Mearian
June 30, 2010 (Computerworld)
The vast majority of hospital CIOs recently surveyed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) said they're concerned that they won't be able to demonstrate "meaningful use" of electronic health records (EHR) -- and therefore won't qualify for federal reimbursements for rolling out the technology.
Ninety-four percent of the CIOs responding to the survey whose results were released Tuesday said that they're concerned they can't meet government requirements about how to report meaningful use of EHRs, and 92% said that they're concerned about a lack of clarity in the criteria used by the government.
Last year, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) set aside $36 billion to help hospitals and doctors purchase equipment to computerize patient medical records, but even the most sophisticated hospitals in the country are struggling to qualify for the payments, PwC's study indicated. Clinicians and hospitals that deploy the technology and prove that it meets a set of government "meaningful use" standards showing it's being effectively used can receive up to $44,000 per doctor in reimbursement funds beginning next year.
-----

R.I. ACLU sues state over rules governing medical records

01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, June 30, 2010
By Felice J. Freyer
Journal Medical Writer
A suit filed Tuesday alleges that newly adopted regulations fail to adequately protect patient privacy under the state’s developing system for exchanging electronic medical records.
The suit by the Rhode Island affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union says that regulations developed by the state Department of Health are full of gaps that leave patients vulnerable.
The regulations govern the Health Information Exchange, a system that will enable doctors, hospitals, laboratories and pharmacies to easily access and exchange patient information.
The exchange, using the name Currentcare, is already enrolling patients and providers but is not yet operational. Patients may choose whether to participate in the exchange and may also specify who can have access to their records. But patients can’t exclude from their records any aspects of their care, such as treatment for addiction or mental illness.
-----

Resistance To EHRs May Widen Healthcare Disparities

Small medical practices serving Medicaid patients have been reluctant to adopt electronic health records because they're already overwhelmed with providing medical services.
By Nicole Lewis,  InformationWeek
June 28, 2010
As the push to implement new health information technology (HIT) among healthcare providers continues, many small physician practices offering services to Medicaid patients have shown a reluctance to adopt HIT, such as electronic health records (EHRs).
If these medical practices continue to resist implementing modern HIT systems, the situation threatens to widen healthcare disparities in the coming years, said Dianne Hasselman, director of quality and equality at the Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS), at a recent public hearing on how technology can improve healthcare delivery among low-income populations.
-----

ONC now taking EHR certifier applications

Posted: July 1, 2010 - 12:30 pm ET
The application window is now open for organizations seeking government recognition as testing and certification bodies for electronic health-record systems eligible for reimbursement under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
So far, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS has received about 40 inquiries regarding applications and had 14 requests for applications, Carol Bean, an ONC standards harmonization analyst, reported to a meeting of the federally chart.
-----

Computerized sign-out holds promise, study finds

Posted: July 1, 2010 - 12:08 pm ET
A system for "computerized rounding" and handover of patient responsibility—also called "sign-out"—developed at the University of Washington may help ease the challenges of complying with medical resident 80-hour work limits.
The Web-based system the university developed, called UW Cores, was found to reduce the time residents at two Seattle hospitals spent managing patient information and generating sign-out materials by 30 to 45 minutes a day "without weakening systematic defenses against error or jeopardizing patient safety," according to a report published in Academic Medicine.
-----

EHR, Operating Cost Hikes Challenge Practice Managers

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media, June 29, 2010

Rising operating costs, managing finances amid Medicare reimbursement shifts, and installing electronic health records are the top three challenges for medical practice managers, according to Medical Practice Today: What Members Have to Say, an annual survey from the Medical Group Management Association.
"It is not surprising that 'maintaining finances with the uncertainty of Medicare reimbursement rates' jumped to the No. 2 spot this year due to the continued congressional irresponsibility in not permanently addressing the flawed sustainable growth rate formula," said William F. Jessee, MD, president/CEO of Englewood, CO-based MGMA.
-----

ONC Advisors Tackle Data Exchange

HDM Breaking News, June 28, 2010
The HIT Policy Committee, an advisory group to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, has recommended that ONC encourage the use of models for exchanging personal health information that do not expose any unencrypted PHI.
These models include direct exchange from message originator to message recipient, or exchange using an intermediary that only performs routing services and has no access to PHI.
-----

After $127 million, VA starts over on scheduling

Posted: June 29, 2010 - 12:00 pm ET
Weaknesses in management and effective oversight have hindered efforts by the Veterans Affairs Department to replace its outpatient scheduling system, the Government Accountability Office has concluded.
In a report released on its website Monday, the GAO chronicles the VA's unsuccessful first attempt to modernize its outpatient scheduling project, otherwise known as the Scheduling Replacement Project.
-----

ONC to issue ‘rules of the road’ for NHIN Exchange

By Mary Mosquera
Friday, June 25, 2010
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT plans to establish rules of the road for the nationwide health information network (NHIN Exchange) in order to expand the kinds of organizations that can participate in it.
Participation in the NHIN Exchange is currently limited to federal health agencies and healthcare organizations that contract with them or are federal grantees.
As the first step in the rulemaking process, ONC will publish a request for information in August to get public comment on the governance process. It expects to then release a proposed rule in early 2011, and to finalize it next summer, said Mary Jo Deering, senior policy advisor in ONC's Office of Policy and Planning.
-----

VA building mobile version of personal health record

By Mary Mosquera
Thursday, June 24, 2010
The Veterans Affairs Department is exploring a number of applications of wireless technologies to improve the health outcomes of veterans, especially those in rural areas that may be hundreds of miles from the closest VA clinic or hospital.
Wireless technologies can link veterans with their providers through personal cell phones and enable them to manage their health, said Gail Graham, deputy chief officer in health information management in the Veterans Health Administration.
For many veterans, “geographical distance from VA’s physical healthcare assets often presents a challenge to receiving care,” she said at a hearing of the House Veterans Affairs Committee health subcommittee June 24.
-----

Mobility To Lead Health IT Innovation

Government stimulus funds will help, but not quickly cure, the lag in health IT adoption caused by years of failure to invest in new technology.
By Nicole Lewis,  InformationWeek
June 25, 2010
The federal government's stimulus investment in healthcare IT is not a panacea, primarily because during the last decade the healthcare industry failed to invest in technology innovation. For that reason, it will take two to three years for the healthcare industry to catch up to other industries such as retail and banking, a new report concludes.
The report, published this month by Crosstree Capital Partners, a Tampa, Fla.-based investment banking firm, also predicts that the only place where completely new inventions are expected is in the wireless device space.
"While there are a few, mostly generic, applications used by doctors on their iPhones and Blackberrys, the devices are still pretty much used as cell phones, text messaging devices, and for e-mail," said Rob Tholemeier, author of the report and a principal covering health IT at Crosstree Capital. "In the next two to three years this will change dramatically as wireless communications and devices will proliferate throughout all aspects of healthcare delivery."
-----

Leapfrog finds high risk of order-entry errors

Posted: June 30, 2010 - 11:45 am ET
The Leapfrog Group, a Washington-based healthcare quality organization formed by large employers, has issued a report urging hospitals and information technology vendors to take a closer look at computerized physician order-entry systems to make sure they are detecting potential errors.
In the study that served as the basis for the report, 214 hospitals evaluated their CPOE systems using a Web-based simulation tool from Leapfrog. The simulations, which involved 10 test patients and 50 medication orders, took place between June 2008 and January 2010. More than half of the total medication orders processed in adult hospitals did not trigger the warnings they should have, according to the report. And among 311 potentially fatal medication orders processed in adult hospitals, only 32.8% prompted a warning.
-----

PACS adoption has reached 'mature stage,' study says

June 25, 2010 | Mike Miliard, Managing Editor
DES PLAINES, IL – A new report from the research firm IMV has found the market for electronic picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) is largely in "replacement mode."
According to "The PACS/IT Continuum: Present Access and Future Integration Strategies, 2010-2012," released by the IMV Medical Information Division, replacement has become the primary motivation for purchasing new systems in 2010, with 85 percent of the planned purchases of complete systems being replacement systems, compared to 15 percent for first buyers.
-----

Advice: Start now to appraise fitness of EHRs

June 25, 2010 | Bernie Monegain, Editor
FALLS CHURCH, VA – Hospitals and physicians that plan to meet meaningful use eligibility for government incentives must start now to assess their technology and talk with their vendors about certification, says Erica Drazen, managing partner of consulting firm CSC's Healthcare Group.
The Office of the National Coordinator announced the final rules for the temporary certification process on June 18. Certification entities are expected to be in place by late summer.
-----

ONC plans governance rule to expand NHIN participants

By Mary Mosquera
Friday, June 25, 2010
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT plans to establish rules of the road for the nationwide health information network (NHIN Exchange) in order to expand the kinds of organizations that can participate in it.
Participation in the NHIN Exchange is currently limited to federal health agencies and healthcare organizations that contract with them or are federal grantees
As the first step in the rulemaking process, ONC will publish a request for information in August to get public comment on the governance process. It expects to then release a proposed rule in early 2011, and to finalize it next summer, said Mary Jo Deering, senior policy advisor in ONC's Office of Policy and Planning.
-----

HIMSS: RFID still mostly used for equipment tracking

Despite more interest in using radiofrequency identification (RFID) to reduce medical errors and increase patient safety, the technology is mainly deployed for non-patient functions, according to a report from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
The society administered an online survey to 222 participants in May to discuss RFID technology. Nearly one-third (31 percent) of survey respondents believed that the widespread use of RFID applications will benefit healthcare organizations in the area of patient safety, followed by assets and/or biomedical equipment tracking (24 percent).
-----

Kirkland: EHR systems are important, but...

Posted: June 28, 2010 - 12:01 am ET
He was for them, now he's against them—even though he still thinks they're a good idea.
On his Dr. Ron Kirkland for Congress Facebook page, Ronald Kirkland, Congressional candidate and former chairman of both the American Medical Group Association and the Jackson (Tenn.) Clinic 120-physician multispecialty group, denounces the stimulus law's subsidies to help physicians buy electronic health-record systems and vows to return any such subsidy should he receive one.
At the opening of the AMGA's March 2009 annual conference in Las Vegas, however, Kirkland sang a different tune, explaining how congressional staffers reached out to the AMGA while drafting the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus law. This led to the inclusion of an $18,000 subsidy for physicians who adopt information technology, Kirkland said. "If this doesn't excite you," he added, "ask a doctor to check your pulse.”
-----

White House releases identity-security plan

Posted: June 28, 2010 - 12:01 am ET
Citing the critical need to improve security and curb identity theft and fraud in cyberspace, the White House, in partnership with other public- and private-sector organizations, has released a plan to promote safer data exchange.
The government's proposed plan, called the National Strategy for Trusted Entities in Cyberspace, aims to address issues such as the safety of personal health information and banking data and relies primarily on the creation of an “identity ecosystem.” The identity ecosystem, according to the draft, is an online environment that would reduce the need for multiple passwords and logins by offering people the opportunity to obtain a secure, interoperable credential for multiple-use authentication.
 -----

Are We Rushing the Push for Electronic Health Records?

Advocates of electronic health record (EHR) systems, which will likely soon be a fixture in medical settings, claim that the use of EHR will reduce health care costs and improve medical outcomes. Although benefits of bringing information technology to health records can be substantial, EHR systems also give rise to increased liability risks for health care providers due to possible software or hardware problems or user errors.
Two Case Western Reserve University professors, in a scholarly article published in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, shed light on liability concerns and EHR systems.
Sharona Hoffman, JD, LLM, professor of law and bioethics and co-director of Case Western Reserve’s Law-Medicine Center, and Andy Podgurski, PhD, professor of computer science at the university’s School of Engineering, recently wrote the article, “E-Health Hazards: Provider Liability and Electronic Health Record Systems,” which offers a comprehensive analysis of the liability risks associated with use of this complex and important technology.
-----

Legal Study: EHRs under-regulated, propose serious liability risks

Despite their many proposed benefits, electronic health record systems could put healthcare providers at significant risk for lawsuits due to software, hardware and user errors, according to a new study in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
The design of the current electronic health record (EHR) systems and the legislation governing them do not adequately protect against — and indeed may increase the risk of — malpractice claims and privacy breach claims, the authors said in a press release announcing their study.
The risks of EHRs have received little attention in the legal literature, despite the fact the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeks to implement EHRs nationwide by 2014, according to the release.
·         Reference:
Hoffman S, Podgurski A. E-Health Hazards: Provider Liability and Electronic Health Record Systems. Berkeley Technology Law Journal [Internet]. 2010 Jun;Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-25(Forthcoming). Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1463671.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

We Have Utter Madness Afoot at DoHA. This Is An Election Pending e-Health Fraud I Believe.

The following is from page 48 of a document that was released yesterday by the Federal Health Minister (07 July, 2010)
The document in full can be downloaded from here:
The document title is

A National Health and Hospitals Network for Australia’s Future – Delivering the Reforms

Stream 8 — eHealth

Overview
The Commonwealth will make a landmark $467 million investment over two years in the key components of an electronic health record system, so that all Australians have access to a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) if they choose to. In order to fully realise the significant benefits of this Commonwealth investment, states and territories will also need to continue their planned or expected investments in core health information systems. States and territories will also need to provide the complementary investments to build their capacity in readiness for connection to this national system.
This will enable Australians to access their own health care information and permit authorised health care providers to access and use this information, when and where it is needed, to provide better coordinated and effective care for the individual. Implementation is expected to focus initially on people who have the most contact with the health and hospital system. These include people with chronic and complex conditions, older Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and mothers and their new-born children.
A PCEHR system will enable Australians who choose to have an electronic health record to have more confidence in the information available to them and their health care providers. It will help patients experience smoother transitions between health care providers, reducing waste and inefficiency, and enable better and safer care that is more responsive to patients’ needs.
Additional privacy safeguards will be established through supporting legislation, regulation, and robust governance arrangements. The national eHealth records system will also be designed to incorporate audit trails, technology, and data management controls and an appropriate security access framework. These features will ensure availability of high-quality information and assist patients to have greater control of their health information.
In addition to the national activities above, it is intended that a number of lead PCEHR implementation sites that align with the national work program, will be concurrently funded across different geographic and functional parts of the Australian health sector. The purpose of these lead implementation sites will be to:
Deploy and test national eHealth infrastructure and standards in real world health care settings;
Demonstrate tangible outcomes and benefits from funded eHealth projects;
Build stakeholder support and momentum behind the national PCEHR system work program; and
Provide a meaningful foundation for further enhancement and roll-out of the national PCEHR system.
Within the agreed national framework of governance, standards, workforce etc, lead implementations will focus on implementing PCEHR components that support sharing of electronic health information.
This investment builds on the work of the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA), which has among its priorities the development of eHealth foundations, the coordination of solutions and processes, and the accelerated adoption of eHealth in Australia.
This investment also builds on the Healthcare Identifier (HI) Service established by legislation in June 2010 and being operated from 1 July 2010 by Medicare Australia. The HI Service will allocate unique identifiers to healthcare recipients, healthcare providers and healthcare organisations to improve safety and accuracy in electronic management and communication of health information. Healthcare identifiers are a key building block for the PCEHR system.

Outcome: Australians have access to their own personally controlled electronic health record

Stream Purpose
To provide better access to health information enabling better health outcomes through more integrated care centred around the needs of patients.
Objectives
Provide every Australian with a PCEHR that is controlled by them.
Ensure individuals’ privacy.
Improve efficiency in the healthcare system through streamlining access to patient information thereby reducing duplication and improving use of scarce resources.
Provide continuity of care by enabling access to patient information at the point of care.
Improve safety and quality in healthcare.
Key Milestones
  • PCEHR interim governance framework agreed and in place
  • PCEHR long term governance framework agreed and in place
  • stakeholder consultation – state and territory governments
  • stakeholder consultation - health care providers and software vendors are informed and engaged in development activities
  • public consultation – public website established
  • public consultation – collect and analyse public views
  • change management – work practice analysis
  • change management – implement training and awareness activities
  • change management – monitor and evaluate training and awareness activities
  • change management – revise and implement ongoing awareness and take up strategies based on lessons learned
  • lead implementation sites – selected (minimum of three)
  • lead implementation sites – contracted
  • lead implementation sites – operational
  • lead implementation sites – initial evaluation
  • lead implementation sites – final evaluation
  • PCEHR analysis, IT architecture and requirements developed
  • PCEHR IT standards developed
  • national infrastructure established
  • legislative amendment as required
  • PCEHR available for registration on-line
----- End Extract
A little analysis reveals this for the utter bunkum it is.
Some examples (there are heaps).
1. The lead implementation sites (at least 3) are to be selected, contracted, operational and implemented and evaluated  by Apr/Jun 2011 and by the same time relevant standards are to be developed.
2. Analysis and development of the IT architecture is to be done Jan/March 2012 after the lead implementations and at the same time as the National Infrastructure is being established.
3. There is funding until June 2012 and the system is not available until then or a bit later. How ongoing operation is to be funded is left hanging.
4. Consultation with providers does not happen until after the lead implementations are completed. So what on earth is going to be in these records and why would any professional access them?
5. It is utterly unclear what happens after the lead implementations are evaluated. Do they all just roll on, turn into mushrooms or what?
All this ignores the points I have made about where the information in the PCEHR is to come from etc etc.
See here:
and here:
This is a fiasco waiting to happen and we can be sure it will be a mess that won’t deliver the claimed benefits on the basis of these plans.
Download and read for yourself!
David.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

A Spectacular Example of the Power and Value of Electronic Health Records – With A Few Others Thrown In.

As we are seeing more health systems gradually ramp up their levels of automation the benefits case for Health IT is rapidly firming. The following is a really fabulous example of how useful clinically decisive information can be derived from EHRs. This is followed by a few more, equally interesting write-ups of things that are being done.

Electronic Medical Records Strengthen Vaccine Safety Monitoring In Seizure Study

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media, June 28, 2010

Intelligent use of electronic health records—even those collected from multiple health systems—can alert providers to harmful medical practices.
That's how Kaiser Permanente's analysis of 459,000 pediatric health records revealed that young children who received the combo MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella) vaccine experienced twice the rate of febrile seizures as did children who received two separate shots—one for measles, mumps, rubella and the other just for varicella.
"This study shows the tremendous power of electronic medical records to improve vaccine safety monitoring," says Nicola P. Klein, MD, co-director of the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center.
She adds that with either type of vaccine, the risk of a child having a seizure and a high fever as a result is very low, but it's important that parents know that risk so they can have informed discussions with their doctors about whether the combination vaccine is worth the risk.
For every 10,000 children given MMRV instead of MMR +V, there was an additional 4.3 seizures during the seven to 10 days following vaccination.
The finding, published in today's edition of the journal Pediatrics, prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month to change its vaccine guidance to one that favored the MMRV over MMR plus V.
Much more here:
It is worth noting that the lack of nationwide systems in Australia made more difficult than it might have been the sorting out of similar issues with the seasonal flu vaccine and young children here. We could have both noticed and responded to the issue better with better real—time surveillance systems.
That said there are also these recent reports along similar lines.
See here:

Clinical Studies Fueled by EMR Data 

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media, June 29, 2010

At Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, NY, researchers are harnessing the power of more than a decade's worth of electronic medical record data using a software program called Clinical Looking Glass (CLG). Developed by the academic medical center, the program interprets de-indentified data for entire patient populations and can be used to gauge the effectiveness of patient safety measures, identify and track public health threats, and provide data for professional articles and published studies.
Researchers, physicians, and other clinicians run as many as 2,800 queries every month using the software. Three examples: They used the program to measure the impact of Medicare regulations on rehabilitation patients, quantify the reduction in radiation exposure for emergency department patients, and track the care and progress of diabetes patients over time.
Measuring Medicare Policy
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) announced in 2005 a new rule that said a large percentage of rehabilitation hospitals' patients must have one of 13 specific diagnoses or the organizations could lose reimbursement. Concerned about the rule's potential impact on patients, a group of physicians at Montefiore, using CLG, performed a retrospective study of discharges from the hospital the year before the rules were implemented and discharges the year after the rules. They found that, in general, "restricting access to inpatient rehabilitation on the basis of diagnosis alone" resulted in patients being readmitted sooner and dying sooner. Their study called for broader, evidence-based guidelines to allocate rehabilitation services.
Reducing Radiation
To reduce unnecessary radiation exposure to patients admitted to the ED with a suspected pulmonary embolism, a group of radiology and nuclear medicine physicians conducted educational seminars for ED physicians. They showed the ED physicians that for certain embolism patients, a high-radiation CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was not necessary and that the lower-radiation ventilation-perfusion scan was just as effective. Using CLG, they showed that the number of CTPA scans performed decreased from 1,473 before the educational seminars to 920 after the seminars for an average reduction in radiation exposure of 23% percent per patient.
Much more here:
and here:

A Data Gold Mine

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Magazine, June 9, 2010

Tech-savvy hospitals are using EMR data to conduct clinical research, improve quality, and inform business decisions.
Clinical studies can take years to conduct. Just one example: A study of the widely used antibiotic gatifloxacin showed it could cause dangerous fluctuations in blood sugar levels among diabetic patients. After further research showed that all patients were at risk for the dangerous side effect, the drug was pulled from the market.
At Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, NY, an analyst was curious whether a new clinical research tool the system had developed could duplicate the results of the gatifloxacin studies. The analyst isolated a cohort of the four-hospital system's patients who had been on the antibiotic and compared them to a group that was on a different antibiotic. Sure enough, the query showed that the patients on gatifloxacin were six times more likely to have high or low blood sugar than those who were not.
But the analyst didn't have to study the drug for months or years, go in front of a committee of physicians and data experts for research review, nor wait for the results to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The analyst performed the query on his lunch break using a software program called Clinical Looking Glass that taps into more than a decade's worth of electronic medical record data.
The program interprets de-indentified data for entire patient populations and can be used to gauge the effectiveness of patient safety measures, identify and track public health threats, and provide data for professional articles and published studies. CLG has been used to measure the impact of Medicare regulations on rehabilitation patients, quantify the reduction in radiation exposure for emergency department patients, and track the care and progress of diabetes patients over time.
It also helped the system react quickly to a surprise FDA hospitalwide study during the heparin scare to check if patients using the blood-thinning drug had a longer hospitalization or died. Montefiore analysts quickly tracked all the patients who were given the drug from December 2007 through January 2008 and compared length of stay and mortality against those who were given the drug during the same period 12 months earlier, before the quality concerns were raised. The query found no increase in either measure—and no cause for alarm for Montefiore patients.
"The goal of these analytics is to gather information and conduct studies that lead to better clinical decision-making," says Eran Bellin, MD, vice president for clinical IT research and development at Montefiore, who was instrumental in designing CLG. "The queries have provided the quantitative evidence for dozens of peer-review journal articles, presentations at professional meetings, institutionwide patient quality improvement initiatives and programs that benefit entire populations."
"We believe it offers a glimpse into how healthcare informatics is shaping the future of medicine," says Montefiore's president and CEO Steven Safyer, MD.
Heaps more here
Also here is more even:

HIT That Enables Quality, Efficiency, and Value

June 2010
In the rush to implement healthcare information technology, providers might miss crucial steps to get the most from their systems and best reengineer care processes to provide higher quality and better value.
In this HealthLeaders Media Breakthroughs report, leading hospital systems—Bon Secours Virginia Health System, Denver Health, Trinity Health, and Hackensack University Medical Center—share insights and the lessons learned that will help you:
  • Understand the value of data warehousing and analysis
  • Use HIT as a transformational quality improvement tool
  • Communicate and align with physicians
  • Define what meaningful use means to your organization’s goals and objectives
See here:
And finally for some future work:

HealthPartners Research Foundation team to study role of electronic health records in reducing heart disease risk

BLOOMINGTON, Minn. --(Business Wire)--
A HealthPartners Research Foundation team has received a National Institutes of Health research grant to develop and implement an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support system to help reduce patients' risk of heart attack or stroke. The team, led by Patrick O'Connor, MD, MPH, senior clinical investigator, HealthPartners Research Foundation, received $3.7 million to conduct the five-year study, 'Prioritized Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk.'
"This is the next generation of personalizing care with decision support that's meaningful to care providers and patients," said O'Connor who is also an assistant medical director at HealthPartners Medical Group. "HealthPartners Medical Group physicians and clinics have been pioneers in this area and this new project will likely lead to further improvements in care for thousands of patients," he said.
The team, in collaboration with the University of Minnesota's Carlson School of Management, will engineer a point-of-care system that identifies and prioritizes evidence-based treatment options for patients at moderate to high risk for a heart attack or stroke within 10 years. With HealthPartners physicians, they will test its effect on risk in a randomizedtrial that includes 18 primary care clinics, 60 primary care physicians and 18,000 patients.
If successful, this approach will reduce the risk of heart attack or stroke for about 35 percent of adults in the United States and maximize the clinical return on investment for electronic health record systems. It could also be a model for using electronic health record technology to deliver personalized medicine in primary care settings.
Full release here:
All in all we live in very exciting times. Sadly most of this will NOT be enabled by the Roxon proposed Personally Controlled EHRs without about a decade of work putting in the systems for providers that are needed first.
David.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Now Here Is An Issue or Two NEHTA and DoHA will Really Need to Address.

And now from the real world we find out about the quality of data in Shared EHRs in the UK where there have been efforts and incentives in place for years to improve the problem!

GPs confident their data is fit to share

24 Jun 2010
Four out of five GPs believe the quality of their practice data is fit for sharing, according to a survey on the future of general practice IT.
More than 500 GPs took part in a survey by doctors’ magazine Pulse which looked at GPs use of IT systems now and their views on access to information out-of-hours.
The survey found that 82% of GPs thought the quality of the data held in their practice’s clinical system was of sufficient quality to share with other healthcare. Only 7% thought their data quality was not fit for sharing and 11% said they were unsure.
The survey also found that 56% of respondents had received electronic records through the GP2GP transfer project. Just under one in three GPs (30%) thought that the quality of the records was good enough to ensure seamless delivery of a high quality service but 25% said that the quality of the records was not good enough.
GP data quality was described as one of the ‘wicked problems’ delaying implementation of the Summary Care Record in the independent evaluation of the SCR LINK published two weeks ago with researchers finding that SCRs did sometimes contain incomplete or inaccurate data.
More here:
Put another way one in six GPs were not sure their records were up to scratch. Not really great news given the efforts over five + years to get the data quality up. A survey asking similar questions now in Australia is needed I reckon the see how much work we have ahead to lift the Australian GP (and specialist) game.
And if that issue is not enough, here is at least some thinking on another contentious issue.
The other issue is consent management so that only what should be shared is shared!
I found this very all interesting.

Govt., vendors show off consent-management tools

Posted: June 30, 2010 - 12:15 pm ET
There are at least seven computerized consent-management software systems either operational or under development that let patients segment their sensitive healthcare information and control and audit who sees or uses their electronic health records.
Today's existing messaging standards are sufficient for allowing patients to communicate their privacy preferences to these systems, according to government and private-sector developers of privacy-protection software systems who testified and demonstrated their wares Monday in Washington at a daylong, HHS-sponsored hearing.
The most sophisticated of these consent management systems let patients exert unprecedented levels of so-called "granular" control over their medical information.
The missing link to wide deployment of these systems, many of the developers said, is not the technology but the lack of a uniform national policy on what level of control patients should enjoy as providers continue to adopt EHR systems and regional and state organizations seek to link them in a proposed national health information network.
The hearing was held before the Privacy & Security Tiger Team, a new work group of the federally chartered Health IT Policy Committee. The committee and its companion Health IT Standards Committee were created pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to advise the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS on health IT issues.
Links to the written presentations of participants and a webcast of the hearing is available at the Tiger Team Web page.
Three of the seven systems featured during the hearing were open-source or public-domain software projects. Two were government-sponsored initiatives.
Lots more here:
It seems on both sides of the Atlantic people are battling with these complex issues.
No one can accuse me of not warning all that will listen that this whole shared patient record business has a zillion wrinkles which might come back and bite you! Care, learning from others and careful planning are vital if you are to have a hope in hell of succeeding!
David.

Useful Set of Presentations from a Recent Aust. General Practice Network e-Health Conference.

I was sent this link earlier today and think it is worthwhile passing on for those who are interested.
The link is here:
Included is the MSIA presentation I discussed a week or so ago here:
Other speakers included Prof Enrico Coirea, Mr Peter Fleming from NEHTA and a host of others.
Enjoy a browse!
David.

Monday, July 05, 2010

An Anniversary That Needs to be Noted. Have We Moved Far Yet?

Just on a year ago the National Health and Hospital Commission (NHHRC) submitted its final report to Health Minister Nicola Roxon. (June 30, 2009)
On E-Health the Executive Summary said the following (Page 8):

Smart use of data, information and communication

Our third lever to support an agile, self improving system is the smart use of data, information and communication.
We are recommending a transforming e-health agenda to drive improved quality, safety and efficiency of health care.
The introduction of a person-controlled electronic health record for each Australian is one of the most important systemic opportunities to improve the quality and safety of health care, reduce waste and inefficiency, and improve continuity and health outcomes for patients. Giving people better access to their own health information through a person-controlled electronic health record is also essential to promoting consumer participation, and supporting self-management and informed decision-making. We want the Commonwealth Government to legislate to ensure the privacy and security of a person’s electronic health data.
Making the patient the locus around which health information flows is critical and will require a major investment in the broader e-health environment. Electronic health information and health care advice will increasingly be delivered over the internet. Broadband and telecommunication networks must be available for all Australians if we are to fulfil the real promise of e-health.
We are also recommending that clinicians and health care providers are supported to ‘get out of paper’ and adopt electronic information storage, exchange and decision support software. The Commonwealth Government must set open technical standards which can be met by the vendor industry while ensuring the confidentiality and security of patient information. Most importantly, we urge governments to expedite agreement on a strengthened national leadership structure for implementing a National Action Plan on E-health, with defined actions to be achieved by specified dates.
Access to good information is also vital to measuring and monitoring the health of our population. We are recommending the development of Healthy Australia Goals 2020 – the first in a rolling series of ten-year goals. We want all Australians to participate in setting these goals and working towards improvements in health outcomes at local, regional and national levels.
We are also keen to promote a culture of continuous improvement through health performance reporting. Our recommendations include:
·         systems to provide comparative clinical performance data back to health services and hospitals, clinical units and clinicians;
·         publicly available information on health services to assist consumers in making informed choices;
·         the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care to analyse, report and advocate on safety and quality across all health settings; and
regular reporting on our progress as a nation in tackling health inequity
----- End Quote
 The detailed e-Health Recommendations are found in Section 5.3 of the report.
All the report and associated literature are here (yes, it has all moved from www.nhhrc.org.au)
It is interesting now to see where we are a year on (See Section 16 – Page 229 on for accountabilities – Mostly NEHTA and DoHA).
From earlier (Page 29) here are the recommendations:

Implementing a national e-health system

We recommend that, by 2012, every Australian should be able to:
·         have a personal electronic health record that will at all times be owned and controlled by that person;
·         approve designated health care providers and carers to have authorised access to some or all of their personal electronic health record; and
·         choose their personal electronic health record provider.
We recommend that the Commonwealth Government legislate to ensure the privacy of a person’s electronic health data, while enabling secure access to the data by the person’s authorised health providers.
We recommend that the Commonwealth Government introduce:
·         unique personal identifiers for health care by 1 July 2010; unique health professional identifiers (HPI-I), beginning with all nationally registered health professionals, by
1 July 2010;
·         a system for verifying the authenticity of patients and professionals for this purpose – a national authentication service and directory for health (NASH) – by 1 July 2010; and
·         unique health professional organisation (facility and health service) identifiers (HPI-O)
by 1 July 2010.
We recommend that the Commonwealth Government develop and implement an appropriate national social marketing strategy to inform consumers and health professionals about the significant benefits and safeguards of the proposed e-health approach.
Ensuring access to a national broadband network (or alternative technology, such as satellite) for all Australians, particularly for those living in isolated communities, will be critical to the uptake of person-controlled electronic health records as well as to realise potential access to electronic health information and medical advice.
We recommend that the Commonwealth Government mandate that the payment of public and private benefits for all health and aged care services depend upon the ability to accept and provide data to patients, their authorised carers, and their authorised health providers, in a format that can be integrated into a personal electronic health record, such that:
·         hospitals must be able to accept and send key data, such as referral and discharge information (‘clinical information transfer’), by 1 July 2012;
·         pathology providers and diagnostic imaging providers must be able to provide key data, such as reports of investigations and supplementary information, by 1 July 2012;
·         other health service providers – including general practitioners, medical and non-medical specialists, pharmacists and other health and aged care providers – must be able to transmit key data, such as referral and discharge information (‘clinical information transfer’), prescribed and dispensed medications and synopses of diagnosis and treatment, by 1 January 2013; and
·         all health care providers must be able to accept and send data from other health care providers by 2013.
We recommend that the Commonwealth Government takes responsibility for, and accelerates the development of a national policy and open technical standards framework for e-health, and that they secure national agreement to this framework for e-health by 2011-12. These standards should include key requirements such as interoperability, compliance and security. The standards should be developed with the participation and commitment of state governments, the IT vendor industry, health professionals, and consumers, and should guide the long-term convergence of local systems into an integrated but evolving national health information system.
We recommend that significant funding and resources be made available to extend e-health teaching, training, change management and support to health care practitioners and managers. In addition, initiatives to establish and encourage increased enrolment in nationally recognised tertiary qualifications in health informatics will be critical to successful implementation of the national e-health work program. The commitment to, and adoption of, standards-compliant e-health solutions by health care organisations and providers is key to the emergence of a national health information system and the success of person-controlled electronic health records.
With respect to the broader e-health agenda in Australia, we concur with and endorse the directions of the National E-Health Strategy Summary (December 2008), and would add that:
·         there is a critical need to strengthen the leadership, governance and level of resources committed by governments to giving effect to the planned National E-Health Action Plan;
·         this Action Plan must include provision of support to public health organisations and incentives to private providers to augment uptake and successful implementation of compliant e-health systems. It should not require government involvement with designing, buying or operating IT systems;
·         in accordance with the outcome of the 2020 Summit and our direction to encourage greater patient involvement in their own health care, that governments collaborate to resource a national health knowledge web portal (comprising e-tools for self-help) for the public as well as for providers. The National Health Call Centre Network (healthdirect) may provide the logical platform for delivery of this initiative; and
·         electronic prescribing and medication management capability should be prioritised and coordinated nationally, perhaps by development of existing applications (such as PBS online), to reduce medication incidents and facilitate consumer amenity.
---- End Extract.
A year on it is clear this is going to be a much longer process that the NHHRC envisaged!
We have given people their identifiers but the implementation of their use is now reckoned to take a couple of years.
NASH was meant to be ready for use but has not been seen as far as I know.
The national professional registration systems are just now creaking into life so it will be a while before provider identifiers are ready for use.
Fortunately the very silly idea of linking messaging capabilities to payments of standard Medicare benefits has gone quiet and work is still underway on getting the Standards in place – let alone fully proven and implemented nationwide. It would be hard to tie payments to messaging without a proven, working, nationally accessible system where all software providers had appropriate modifications in place and the data content rules etc were fully evolved. Not next week then!
The  professional and patient portals are also still well off into the future as far as we can all tell.
Lastly and critically – we now have some of the implementation funds without the leadership and governance as recommended in the NHHRC Report.
All in all rather a mixed and patchy implementation effort with most of the ‘hard stuff’ not addressed.
I find it interesting the NHHRC suggested choice of Person Controlled EHRs for patients. According to Ms Roxon that idea is out the window for now – with Medicare Australia to be doing it.
See here:
For other comments on the PCEHR proposal see here:
It is difficult to see a passing grade on all this just yet!
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 25 – Results – 05 July, 2010.

The question was:
Will A Change to a New Prime Minister Improve Australia's Progress in E-Health?
For Sure
 - 3 (8%)
 Possibly
 - 6 (17%)
 Don't Know
 - 5 (14%)
 Probably Not
 - 18 (52%)
 No Way
 - 2 (5%)
Votes: 34
An interesting outcome, with 57% saying probably not or worse and only 25% positive on an improved outcome.
Again, many thanks to all those who voted
David.