Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 18 December, 2010.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-259946/CPOEs-Can-Decrease-Mortality-Rates-Research-Shows

CPOEs Can Decrease Mortality Rates, Research Shows

Cynthia Johnson, for HealthLeaders Media , December 9, 2010

By now, many healthcare organizations are on the road to implementing electronic medical record (EMR) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems that we optimistically hope will cut costs, improve quality, and reduce medical errors—as well as comply with federal and state regulations. Although some organizations are further along on this journey than others, we all could use a little encouragement that we're travelling in the right direction.

A recent study released by researchers at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (LPCH) and Stanford University may be just the signpost we've been waiting to see.

For the first time, researchers have shown that a significant decrease in hospital-wide ­mortality rates can be associated with implementing a CPOE system that enables physicians and other medical staff to order medications, tests, and other treatments electronically. If configured properly, the systems can also provide decision support at the point of care.

-----

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1010029?query=TOC

Telemonitoring in Patients with Heart Failure

Sarwat I. Chaudhry, M.D., Jennifer A. Mattera, M.P.H., Jeptha P. Curtis, M.D., John A. Spertus, M.D., M.P.H., Jeph Herrin, Ph.D., Zhenqiu Lin, Ph.D., Christopher O. Phillips, M.D., M.P.H., Beth V. Hodshon, M.P.H., J.D., R.N., Lawton S. Cooper, M.D., M.P.H., and Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2010; 363:2301-2309December 9, 2010

Background

Small studies suggest that telemonitoring may improve heart-failure outcomes, but its effect in a large trial has not been established.

Methods

We randomly assigned 1653 patients who had recently been hospitalized for heart failure to undergo either telemonitoring (826 patients) or usual care (827 patients). Telemonitoring was accomplished by means of a telephone-based interactive voice-response system that collected daily information about symptoms and weight that was reviewed by the patients' clinicians. The primary end point was readmission for any reason or death from any cause within 180 days after enrollment. Secondary end points included hospitalization for heart failure, number of days in the hospital, and number of hospitalizations.

Results

The median age of the patients was 61 years; 42.0% were female, and 39.0% were black. The telemonitoring group and the usual-care group did not differ significantly with respect to the primary end point, which occurred in 52.3% and 51.5% of patients, respectively (difference, 0.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.0 to 5.6; P=0.75 by the chi-square test). Readmission for any reason occurred in 49.3% of patients in the telemonitoring group and 47.4% of patients in the usual-care group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.0 to 6.7; P=0.45 by the chi-square test). Death occurred in 11.1% of the telemonitoring group and 11.4% of the usual care group (difference, −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.3 to 2.8; P=0.88 by the chi-square test). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the secondary end points or the time to the primary end point or its components. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Among patients recently hospitalized for heart failure, telemonitoring did not improve outcomes. The results indicate the importance of a thorough, independent evaluation of disease-management strategies before their adoption. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00303212.)

-----

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/210618.php

European Pharmacists Call For Pharmacist Access To Electronic Patient Records

08 Dec 2010

The Pharmaceuctical Group of the European Union (PGEU) the association representing Community Pharmacists, calls for pharmacists to be granted access to electronic patient records in a statement on E Health released today.

The statement points out that E Health represents a major opportunity to improve patient safety and make health services in Europe more cost effective and efficient.

Appropriate deployment of both e-prescribing systems and electronic health records, as well as other ICT tools such as decision support systems, can significantly contribute to the minimisation of harm to patients who have to take multiple medications.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/ipad-goes-or

The iPad goes to the OR

December 07, 2010 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

DURHAM, NC – Surgeons at Georgetown University are exploring the benefits of using an iPad in the operating room, according to an article published in the Journal Surgical Radiology. One surgeon says the technology's most obvious advantage in the OR is providing a "convenient way to easily access previous patient imaging."

The article, "The iPad in the Hospital and Operating Room," was written by Felasfa M. Wodajo, MD, senior editor, iMedicalApps.com and assistant professor, orthopedic surgery, at both VCU School of Medicine, Inova Campus
and Georgetown University Hospital.

-----

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/business/24drug.html

November 23, 2010

Privacy Groups Fault Online Health Sites for Sharing User Data With Marketers

By NATASHA SINGER

QualityHealth is a popular health Web site with more than 20 million registered users that offers online medical information and e-mail newsletters on a variety of topics, including diabetes, allergies, asthma and arthritis.

But according to a complaint filed Tuesday with the Federal Trade Commission, site visitors who provide personal details about themselves might not be aware that QualityHealth collects information about people’s medical conditions, preferred medicines and treatment plans and uses it to profile its users for prescription drug marketing.

Rob Rebak, the chief executive of QualityHealth, a company also known as Marketing Technology Solutions of Delaware, did not return a request for comment.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101208/NEWS/312089996/

Health IT problems make top tech hazards list

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 8, 2010 - 11:00 am ET

Health information technology problems ranked fifth on a list of the Top 10 Technology Hazards for 2011, according a report released by ECRI Institute, Plymouth Meeting, Pa.

Data loss, system incompatibilities and other health IT complications made the annual list of the not-for-profit patient safety organization, which reflects not a count of the most common or severe incidents, but ECRI staffers' judgment “about which risks should receive priority now," according to a news release about the report. Those opinions are based on ECRI's review of recent recalls and other actions, literature reviews, reports to ECRI's own medical device problem reporting database and those of other organizations, "and our experience in investigating and consulting on device-related incidents," according to the release.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/ecri-research-technology-hazards-41481-1.html

ECRI Predicts 2011's Top Health Technology Hazards

HDM Breaking News, December 7, 2010

ECRI Institute, a Plymouth Meeting, Pa.-based research firm and patient safety organization, has issued its list of the Top 10 Health Technology Hazards for 2011, with information technologies playing a prominent role.

Listed as No. 5 is "Data loss, system incompatibilities and other health I.T. complications." The convergence of medical technology such as monitors and ventilators into electronic health records brings many benefits to care, according to ECRI. But ineffective convergence can lead to data being lost or associated with the wrong patient.

-----

http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=05873D2DF7AA430282663364A5CB7A11

CCHIT to Begin Testing Hospital-Developed EHR Technology

‘EACH’ program intended to help hospitals close gaps in their mix of certified and uncertified EHR technologies.

By David Raths The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) is preparing to launch its certification program for hospitals with self-developed electronic health record technology.

During a Dec. 1 webinar, Alisa Ray, CCHIT’s executive director, announced that the organization would begin pilot testing in December with three hospitals: New York University Hospital, Care Partners in Boston and Edward Hospital in Naperville, Ill. The official launch of the program will be Jan. 10.

-----

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/733675

Majority of Children's Hospitals Not Set Up for Electronic Health Records

Nancy Fowler Larson

December 6, 2010 — Most pediatric hospitals lack even the minimum setup needed to keep good electronic health records (EHRs), citing cost as the chief deterrent, according to a study published in the December issue of the Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine.

EHRs are growing in importance as chronic conditions such as asthma, obesity, and behavioral disorders emerge as the primary reasons for children's hospitalizations. Easily obtainable knowledge about patients' prior treatment is advantageous in managing these conditions, but such data are in short supply.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/data-standards-healthcare-supply-chain-gain-ground

Data standards for healthcare supply chain gain ground

December 06, 2010 | Bernie Monegain, Editor

WASHINGTON – Healthcare organizations are moving closer to the adoption of global supply chain standards, according to an independent survey of healthcare providers, group purchasing organizations, device manufacturers, wholesalers and distributors.

The Health Industry Group Purchasing Association's (HIGPA) Committee on eHealth Standards announced the results of the survey on Dec. 3.

-----

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/6492/basingstoke_rolls_out_ibm_portal

Basingstoke rolls out IBM portal

09 Dec 2010

Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust is rolling out a clinical portal based on IBM’s Websphere platform.

The portal will allow users to view historical patient information, access the trust’s JAC e-prescribing system, place requests for pathology and radiology through its Sunquest ICE system, and create correspondence for GPs.

IBM has been working with the trust on the portal and on getting its systems ready for go-live. This has included upgrading the trust's core network, virtualising its servers in a move from 120 non-IBM to 10 IBM servers, and deploying a wireless network.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101208/NEWS/101209955/

Confidence in meaningful-use readiness plunges: CHIME

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 8, 2010 - 5:00 pm ET

The percentage of chief information officers who are confident that their organizations will qualify by April 2011 for federal incentive payments for the purchase of electronic health-record systems plunged to 15%, down by nearly one-half from 28% of responding CIOs in a similar survey released in August, according to the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives.

Oct. 1 was the start date for hospitals under the Medicare portion of the program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Hospitals have to string together 90 consecutive days of meeting federal meaningful-use criteria within the 2011 federal fiscal year to qualify for reimbursement payments on their EHR investments.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101209/NEWS/312099995

ONC looks to evaluate health IT training

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 9, 2010 - 11:45 am ET

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS is seeking public comment on a proposed survey of the efficacy of its own health IT workforce development program.

In April, the ONC awarded $112 million in grants under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to dozens of universities and community colleges for various IT workforce training and advanced-education programs ranging from six-month certificates through post-graduate degrees.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2010/home-health-technology-could-ease-strain-on-health-care-system.aspx

Friday, December 10, 2010

Home Health Technology Could Ease Strain on Health Care System

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- On New Year's Day, the oldest of the country's 77 million baby boomers will turn 65. Those baby boomers will become eligible for Medicare, if they are not already, and, increasingly, they will be putting more strain on the U.S. health care system.

Medical advances have led to improved survivability of many diseases and longer life spans. In 2000, the proportion of U.S. residents ages 65 and older was 12%, or 35 million. By 2020, the percentage of the U.S. population ages 65 and older is expected to increase to 17%, or 50 million Americans.

-----

http://www.cmio.net/index.php?option=com_articles&view=article&id=25515&division=cmio

NIST partners with ONC, AHRQ to provide EHR usability guidance

Written by Editorial Staff

December 9, 2010

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has partnered with the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to publish new reports to guide software developers in improving EHR usability.

Usability has been a topic of considerable interest in the health IT community; one of the new reports provides NIST guidance about processes of user-centered design (UCD) for EHR application developers.

UCD serves to engineer improved usability and human performance into a system or device, according to the report. UCD models have the following principles:

  • Understand user needs, workflows and work environments;
  • Engage users early and often;
  • Set user performance objectives;
  • Design the user interface from known human behavior principles and familiar user interface models;
  • Conduct usability tests to measure how well the interface meets user needs; and
  • Adapt the design and iteratively test with users until performance objectives are met.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101210/NEWS/312109997

Most docs using at least partial EHR: CDC

By Maureen McKinney

Posted: December 10, 2010 - 11:45 am ET

Adoption of health information technology is growing among office-based physicians, according to preliminary results of a survey released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

More than half of physicians reported using at least a partial electronic health-record system in their practices, according to 2010 estimates from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, conducted by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. That figure is up slightly from 48.3% of physicians in 2009.

-----

KP Follows Data To Better Hip, Knee Replacements

By developing registries and tapping e-medical record data, Kaiser Permanente is improving outcomes for hip and knee implant patients.

By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, InformationWeek

Dec. 8, 2010

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=228600158

At Kaiser Permanente, a recently released study about hip and knee replacement devices highlights how best practices can be developed (and discovered) and patient safety bolstered in large part through the gathering and analyzing of data in patient’s electronic medical records.

With 600,000 knee and hip replacements performed annually in the U.S. -- and with those numbers expected to grow as Baby Boomers age -- KP’s study advocates the development of a national registry to track procedures and patient outcomes in those surgeries.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/acquisition-hie-payer-medicity-aetna-41478-1.html

Aetna to Buy HIE Vendor Medicity

HDM Breaking News, December 7, 2010

Insurer Aetna Inc. has agreed to acquire health information exchange platform vendor Medicity Inc. for approximately $500 million. The acquisition is expected to close in early January.

Salt Lake City-based Medicity has considerable market share among emerging state HIEs, and regional and proprietary HIEs. In total, the company says it serves more than 760 hospitals, 125,000 physician users and 250,000 end users.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/print/TEC-259847/Blumenthal-EHRs-Change-for-the-Better

Blumenthal, EHRs: Change for the Better?

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , December 7, 2010

Each year the editors at HealthLeaders magazine choose 20 people who are making healthcare better. One of my nominees this year was David Blumenthal, MD, the national coordinator for health information technology. I called him "kind of a rock star" among healthcare tech types—I wonder how this buttoned-down doc will react to that characterization. And I wonder, too, how the healthcare industry in general will react to the idea that we think he is one of the 20 people who are playing a crucial role in the betterment of healthcare.

I'm guessing that opinions either way would be not so much a referendum on Blumenthal personally but on electronic health records systems in general.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=75217

Direct Project completes first models of simple NHIN

By Mary Mosquera

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The first version of the software that will allow simple information exchange between providers, a crucial enabler for the first stage of meaningful use of electronic health records, was announced by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.

The open source reference model of the standards and services that enable connectivity, which will be available as both Java and .Net formats, will be deployed first in a series of pilots to test it for real-world use, according to Arien Malec, coordinator of the Direct Project, the new name for the old NHIN Direct, a project of the ONC.

The Direct Project is a streamlined version of the more robust nationwide health information network standards set (NHIN), and will offer physicians and small practices the ability to conduct basic health record exchanges. For example, a primary care physician who is referring a patient to a specialist can use the Direct Project to send a clinical summary of that patient to the specialist, and to receive a summary of the consultation.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/print/LED-259710/EMR-Implementation-How-Do-You-Stack-Up-Against-Your-Peers

EMR Implementation: How Do You Stack Up Against Your Peers?

Philip Betbeze, for HealthLeaders Media , December 2, 2010

I think by now, we're past the point of arguing whether introducing complex technology into the healthcare continuum is a good idea. Whether to help caregivers make the right decisions more quickly, to better integrate clinical and financial systems to cut down on waste, government mandates, or a host of other good reasons to automate many parts of the healthcare process, hospitals and health systems are investing as never before in technological innovation.

Besides, even if you're stubborn enough to think it's not a good idea, or, at least, that it's unproven and too expensive, you know the feds are also behind the push. And when a customer that pays the freight for up to 50% and more of your patient flow says "jump," most of you who haven't seen the need for an EMR are now asking, "how high?"

-----

http://www.healthimaging.com/index.php?option=com_articles&view=article&id=25416&division=hiit

Orion Health updates HIE

Written by Editorial Staff

December 2, 2010

Orion Health has added a modular suite of components to its health information exchange (HIE) tools, allowing healthcare organizations to customize their exchanges.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101206/NEWS/312069979/

Health-record providers take aim at privacy concerns

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 6, 2010 - 12:00 pm ET

The main federal privacy law covering electronic patient records that are held by healthcare providers may be perceived as more stringent than the laws and rules regulating personal health-record systems, but the privacy practices of some PHR providers are far more patient-controlled and thus, protective, according to panelists at a recent daylong public hearing on PHR privacy and security.

"When we look at this whole privacy debate, we're looking at it the wrong way," said panelist Colin Evans, the former director of digital health policy and standards for computer chipmaker Intel Corp. and now CEO of Dossia, a PHR provider launched in 2006 by Intel, Wal-Mart Stores and several other major U.S. employers. Evans was one of 21 panelists at the Dec. 3 event in Washington, which was sponsored by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/personal-health-records-phr-privacy-security-consumer-access-testimony-41475-1.html

PHR Exec: Providers, Payers Block Patient Data Access

HDM Breaking News, December 6, 2010

Too often, providers and payers use privacy and security issues as excuses to not permit patients access to their own information, the leader of a personal health records software vendor told federal officials on Dec. 3.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and the Federal Trade Commission held a public roundtable on Dec. 3 to hash out PHR issues. They got an earful from Colin Evans, president and CEO at Dossia, a Cambridge, Mass.-based PHR vendor targeting large employers.

The real barrier to consumer access of their health information via PHRs is not privacy and security issues but the unwillingness of providers and payers holding the information to give consumers control over information, Evans said.

-----

http://www.cmio.net/index.php?option=com_articles&view=article&id=25442&division=cmio

ONC: $16M program will fund HIE breakthroughs

Written by Editorial Staff

December 3, 2010

The Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT has allotted more than $16 million to fund the Health Information Exchange (HIE) Challenge Program, which encourages breakthroughs for nationwide HIE.

The program focuses on five challenge areas identified as key needs since federal and state governments began implementation of the HITECH Act, according to the HHS.

Awards will fund the development of technology and approaches that will be developed in pilot sites and then shared, reused and leveraged by other states and communities to increase nationwide interoperability.

The five themes are:

  1. Achieving health goals through HIE;
  2. Improving long-term and post-acute care transitions;
  3. Giving patients access to their own health information;
  4. Developing tools and approaches to search for and share granular patient data (such as specific lab results for a given time period); and
  5. Fostering strategies for population-level analysis.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/renamed-direct-project-demonstrate-email-secure-messaging/2010-12-06

Renamed Direct Project to demonstrate email-like secure messaging

December 6, 2010 — 2:09pm ET | By Neil Versel

NHIN Direct, we hardly knew thee.

The health information exchange protocol to help small physician practices participate in the Nationwide Health Information Network and achieve a key "meaningful use" measure--often referred to as the "trust fabric" of HIE--has a new name: the Direct Project.

More importantly, the rebranded Direct Project has completed its open-source enabling software and is launching a series of pilots to demonstrate the effectiveness of secure messaging of sensitive healthcare data over the Internet. This set of standards-based technical tools and services will allow providers and other healthcare entities to "push" electronic messages to known, trusted recipients much like email, except that these healthcare messages will be encrypted to HIPAA standards.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/hhs-agenda-looks-it-self-management-patient-engagement/2010-12-06

HHS agenda looks to IT for self-management, patient engagement

December 6, 2010 — 4:14pm ET | By Neil Versel

HHS' newest 10-year health goals for the country, Healthy People 2020, focus on prevention, shared decisionmaking between patients and providers, personalized self-management of health conditions and, yes, "meaningful use" of health IT. The department is issuing a related challenge, called myHealthyPeople, to application developers to create apps for healthcare professionals who track state- and community-level health data.

The initiative's overarching goals include attaining high quality, longer lives free of preventable disease, disability, injury, and premature death; and eliminating health disparities and improving the health of all groups. "This milestone in disease prevention and health promotion creates an opportunity to leverage information technology to make Healthy People come alive for all Americans in their communities and workplaces," HHS Chief Technology Officer Todd Park says in a press release.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/few-hospitals-closing-loop-med-administration/2010-12-06

Few hospitals closing the loop on med administration

December 6, 2010 — 2:49pm ET | By Neil Versel

"Closing the loop" on medication management has long been discussed as a worthy health IT goal, but just 5 percent of U.S. hospitals have been able to get there, Health Data Management reports. That figure comes from a recent HIMSS Analytics report on EMR adoption.

There are many reasons why closed-loop medication management is so elusive. "When you look at medication management across the continuum of care and all the processes involved, they're complex and have multiple points of failure," Mark Siska, assistant director of informatics and technology for pharmacy services at the Mayo Clinic, tells HDM. "There are a number of opportunities for distraction and miscommunication, so automating medication management and connecting everything is very challenging."

-----

http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/12/professors-at-harvard-and-nottingham.html

Sunday, December 05, 2010

Professors at Harvard and Nottingham Medical School (UK): Are we repeating the UK's clinical IT failures in the US?

In the opinion piece "Don't Repeat the UK's Electronic Health Records Failure" (Huffington Post, Dec. 5, 2010), Dr. Stephen B. Soumerai, Professor of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Dr. Anthony Avery, Professor of Primary Care at the University of Nottingham Medical School, UK share familiar themes on health IT.

These themes will be especially familiar to HC Renewal readers and to my students and other readers of my Medical Informatics teaching website.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/robot-er-staff-could-speed-triage/2010-12-07

Robot ER staff could speed triage

December 7, 2010 — 2:41pm ET | By Sandra Yin

If a group of computer engineers gets their way, we will no longer hear stories of patients dying in the ER after excruciatingly long waits. A solution for overburdened triage staff and long emergency room wait times appears to be in sight.

If you're willing to wait five years, robots could help speed the ER triage process, according to Mitch Wilkes, associate director of the Center for Intelligent Systems and associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at Vanderbilt University. He is the lead author of a paper presented yesterday at the Humanoids 2010 conference held in Nashville.

The paper describes an ER that would feature electronic kiosks (like those at the airport) at the registration desk and smart chairs. A mobile robot or two might monitor patients in the waiting room.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Friday, December 17, 2010

Now This Will Be A Fun Tender To Watch! I Am Not Sure All The Ducks Are Actually Aligned.

The following announcement appeared yesterday.

Tender Call Marks New Stage in e-health Development

The Australian Government’s personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) system took a further step forward today with the call for an organisation to evaluate the benefits and capabilities of the new system.

17 December 2010

The Gillard Government’s personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) system took a further step forward today with the call for an organisation to evaluate the benefits and capabilities of the new system.

This first major Request for Tender for the PCEHR system, issued today, was welcomed by the Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon.

“This organisation will have a key role in ensuring the implementation of e-health records will deliver real benefits for patients,” Ms Roxon said.

“The successful tenderer will put in place the analytical and evaluation framework that will underpin the development of e-health records.”

Today’s call for tenders comes on the back of the successful national e-health conference in Melbourne, and underlines the Government’s commitment to make more health information available to Australians at the click of a mouse through personally controlled electronic health records.

The successful tenderer will monitor and measure the progress of the program, analyse the benefits being progressively delivered, and evaluate the system’s growing capability.

The successful tenderer will also examine the trends that will affect the roll-out of the system, and provide continuing feedback to the Department of Health and Ageing and the National E-Health Transition Authority, as the managing agent of the program.

“This call for tenders is a key element to ensure the Government’s $466.7 million investment in the PCEHR system realises its full benefits, and does so in the most efficient and cost-effective way,” Ms Roxon said.

An industry briefing on the RFT will be held in Canberra on 17 January, 2011. Tenders close on Friday, 11 February 2011. Interested parties can access the documentation through the AusTender website https://www.tenders.gov.au.

The release is found here:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/mr-yr10-nr-nr207.htm

Some coverage has appeared here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/feds-search-for-e-health-partner/story-fn4htb9o-1225972232539

Feds search for e-health partner

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • December 17, 2010 12:01AM

THE Gillard government is seeking a private sector partner to finesse its $467 million nationwide electronic patient records rollout.

The brief is to monitor and measure progress of the personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) program through an analytical and evaluation framework.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon said the successful bidder would have a key role in ensuring the system delivered real benefits to patients.

“The organisation will put in place a framework underpinning the development of e-health records,” she said. “It will analyse the benefits as they are progressively delivered, and evaluate the system’s growing capability.”

The partner will also “examine trends affecting the roll-out”, and provide “ongoing feedback” to the Health department and its project manager, the National E-Health Transition Authority.

And here:

DoHA on the hunt for partner in e-health rollout

The agency will work with the Department of Health and Ageing and NEHTA to deliver the project

The Federal Government is on the hunt for a partner for the rollout of its Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) program.

The $466.7 million program, outlined in the 2010-11 budget, includes the design, build and rollout of e-health records over two years from the 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2012.

Once the program has been implemented, all Australians who wish to participate will have the ability to register for their own personally controlled electronic health record from 1July 2012. This will also enable the quick exchange of patient-controlled, high priority healthcare information between systems ready to connect to the PCEHR system, including, hospital discharge summaries, referrals, and medications lists.

“Australians will be able to check their medical history online through the introduction of personally controlled electronic health records, which will boost patient safety, improve health care delivery, and cut waste and duplication,” health department documents read.

According to department documents, the agency will work closely with the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) and the National e-health transition authority (NEHTA) in the delivery of the program.

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/371707/doha_hunt_partner_e-health_rollout/?eid=-6787&uid=25465

The key requirements run like this:

The Benefits and Evaluation Partner will:

  • Develop and deliver a Benefits Realisation and Evaluation Framework for the whole PCEHR Program;
  • Design and deliver a program monitoring and measurement capability for the whole PCEHR Program;
  • Provide a deep and thorough analysis and evaluation capability for the whole PCEHR Program; and

Provide a complementary research capability for the gathering of information that is relevant and of value to the build and rollout of the PCEHR Program.

----- End Extract

I don’t envy those responding to this given the level of vagueness of what the other partners and going to deliver and by when.

This is the best spot to register and download a copy of the RFT.

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/2171011

I plan a close read over the weekend. I am not sure and am keen to find out how one is meant to evaluate a program that has only just started - which is the way it seems to read.

David.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

The Top 8 Posts for 2010 - It is Interesting What it is that Excites the Desire to Read a Blog Post?

Click on the links to browse the full post. This order is provided by Feedburner.

And the Winner - with an astonishing 1431 page reads is;!

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/09/sometimes-rubbish-really-comes-from.html

Sometimes Politicians Really Comes Out With Rubbish. This Is One of the Worst.

The following appeared today.

Roxon demands Coalition admits it was wrong on e-health

HEALTH Minister Nicola Roxon will seek an admission from the Coalition that it was wrong on e-health.

She will also seek Coalition support for health IT measures in the new parliament.

"The Coalition does not believe in e-health," she told The Australian.

Coming in at No 2 we have:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/11/talk-about-not-being-able-to-organise.html

Talk About Not Being Able To Organise a Party in a Brewery - More Overpromising and Under-delivering It Would Seem!

The following appeared on the weekend:

MyHospitals on a waiting list: private sector keen to launch its own initiative

  • Adam Creswell, Health editor
  • From: The Australian
  • October 30, 2010 12:00AM

A BRAVE new world of public hospital transparency seemed to be on the horizon following the election of the Rudd government in 2007.

A perception that was encouraged by Labor's most senior figures.

Truculent states would have their heads knocked together, seemed to be the message; and they were required for the first time to divulge information that would allow an unprecedented level of scrutiny of public hospital performance.

And for No 3 we have:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/11/sa-health-takes-risky-path-recently.html

SA Health Takes A Risky Path. A Recently Merged Company With Little Australian Experience.

The following press release appeared a few days ago.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/south-australias-public-health-system-selects-allscripts-as-vendor-of-choice-for-80-hospital-electronic-health-record-project-108659804.html

South Australia's Public Health System Selects Allscripts as Vendor of Choice for 80-Hospital Electronic Health Record Project

SA Health Cites Allscripts Success with International Healthcare Organizations

Sunrise™ Enterprise Implementation to Provide Foundation for Improved Quality, Efficiency of Care

CHICAGO and ADELAIDE, Australia, Nov. 17, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- SA Health, the public health system of South Australia, today named Allscripts as the Vendor of Choice (VOC) for a strategic initiative to improve patient care, satisfaction and clinical workflow across its network of hospitals and health clinics. SA Health plans to deploy the Sunrise Enterprise™ 5.5 suite of advanced clinical, access management and financial solutions.

And for No 4 we have:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/09/view-from-e-health-front-line-one-mans.html

The View From The E-Health Front Line. One Man’s View.

This is what I found to be a wonderful note from someone on the ground. Posted with his permission. (It is in note form - but the intent is clear!)

---- Begin E-Mail.

David,

Thanks for your article in the AUSTRALIAN this weekend.

Have visited http://www.aushealthit.blogspot.com/

Could not see where/how to add to the blog discussion.

As a medico about to retire [at 65] and having spent some 36 years in anaesthetics, may I comment:

Commenced a Health Informatics course with UTAS ... which disappointed me as the curriculum ran out of steam.

Prof did not even answer my letter.

And next as No 5 we have:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/11/secret-event-to-which-you-are-probably.html

The Secret Event To Which You are Probably Not Invited. The Arrogance and Exclusivity Of These Incompetents is Just Amazing!

This e-mail was sent out today to the select few - not me that is for sure.

Revolutionising Australia’s Health Care

Dear Prof. xxxxx

The Department of Health and Ageing has the pleasure of inviting you to attend the upcoming National e-health Conference to be held on Tuesday 30 November and Wednesday 1 December 2010, at the Melbourne Convention Exhibition Centre.

This Conference is an important opportunity for stakeholders to discuss how e-health and telehealth will drive the delivery of health care into the future, including the personally controlled electronic health record system.

Over two days, compelling speakers will lead the conversation through plenary sessions, while subject matter specialists will lead streams that focus on the national e-health agenda. The full conference agenda will be made available shortly.

No 6 is:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/11/now-here-is-job-i-would-avoid-like.html

Now Here Is a Job I Would Avoid Like the Plague!

An interesting advertisement appeared in first few pages of the Financial Review today.

Director E-Health and ICT Strategy.

Client in NSW Health.

The job has (they say):

- A Strategic Leadership Role

- A Complex Dynamic Environment

- A Local Role with National Agenda

It seems NSW Health have decided to create a new Branch in the Health Department and the Branch is to play a key role in ‘positioning NSW at the forefront of the National E-Health Agenda’

Success will apparently develop a State Wide Resource for Strategic Expert Advice to the health system.

Somehow this sounds remarkably like the Information Resource Management Centre (IRMC) which was established a little over 20 years ago at NSW Health. Since then the place has been re-organised at least five times I can recall!

No 7 turns out to be:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/10/nehta-unaccountability-just-rolls-on-it.html

NEHTA Unaccountability Just Rolls On. It Is A Serious Worry I Believe.

The following appeared yesterday.

NEHTA HR bill off limits

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • October 20, 2010 3:10PM

OPPOSITION calls for details of the National E-Health Transition Authority's spending have once again been rebuffed by the Health Department.

In replies to outstanding Senate estimates questions from June 3, Health yesterday released year-old figures for NEHTA's expenditure on contractors and consultants.

With Health back before the Community Affairs committee today and e-health matters on the agenda for tonight at an estimates hearing, Health belatedly supplied information from NEHTA's 2008-09 annual report, published last October 29, among a flurry of answers over the past week which saw the portfolio file expand from around 230 pages to 772 by the close of business yesterday.

And lucky last No 8 is:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-needs-to-come-from-planned-e.html

What Needs To Come From the Planned E-Health Summit? A Clear Way Forward Would be a Good Start!

A short while ago (October 28, 2010) Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon announced there would be an e-Health Conference (or Summit) - Revolutionising Australia’s Health Care held in late November 2010.

In announcing the Summit she confirmed that she and Minister Conroy would be speaking she said that the e-Health Summit will take place on the 30 November and 1 December at the Melbourne Convention Exhibition Centre. Attendees are to be “the nation’s leading health experts, consumer groups and information technology specialists who will come together to discuss the technological revolution in the delivery of health care” The full press release is available on the Department of Health web site.

The stimulus for having the Summit is explained in the following two sentences from the release. “The Gillard Government is investing almost $470 million to introduce e-health across the health system – including the introduction of personally controlled electronic health records to be rolled out from July 2012,” and “This investment will build upon the $392 million committed to modernise the health system by providing Medicare rebates for online consultations across a range of specialties for the first time.”

They have all been good fun. I wonder what will make next year’s list!

I hope 2011 is a good!

David.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

FoxNews Talks About Wikileaks and E-Health - Do They Have a Point?

This popped up a few days ago.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/07/wikileaks-breach-raises-concern-privacy-electronic-medical-records/

WikiLeaks Breach Raises Concern About Privacy of Electronic Medical Records

The embarrassing leak of a quarter-million State Department documents by WikiLeaks has recharged the debate over electronic medical records, raising concern that the government may not be capable of safeguarding Americans' most intimate health care secrets when their records go digital.

Doctors and privacy advocates alike are pointing to the havoc wreaked by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and allegedly Bradley Manning, the low-level Army private accused of facilitating it, in arguing that the government needs to slow down its push for digital medical records.

The Obama administration is calling for all doctors and hospitals to go digital by 2014 or, if they're in the Medicare system, face penalties starting the following year. The 2009 stimulus bill pumped billions of dollars in incentives into this effort, while this year's health care law set up more programs to encourage the use and study of digital dossiers.

The goal is to reduce costs and medical errors by making this information accessible, presumably to the right people at the right time. But as the WikiLeaks fiasco showed, the bigger the network grows the more likely it is that the wrong people can take advantage of it.

"Even the most top-secret things can't be kept secret," said Dr. Alieta Eck, who with her husband runs a clinic near Edison, N.J., for the poor and uninsured. Eck said she keeps electronic records for her office only but does not plan on meeting the new federal standards, citing concerns about how that information will be shared and how it could erode the trust she has with her patients.

"If you think WikiLeaks is bad, this is gonna be WikiLeaks on steroids," said Deborah Peel, founder of Patient Privacy Rights.

Peel, who has long expressed concerns about the digitization of medical records, said "everything from prescription records to your DNA" will soon be floating around, susceptible to hackers from the outside and troublemakers from the inside.

She cited a study from health care security firm FairWarning, which estimated that health care providers have on average between 25 and 100 privacy breaches per month -- absent the kind of monitoring system that FairWarning sells.

The Department of Health and Human Services has stressed the importance of patient privacy as it encourages medical providers to go digital. The department this year has been formulating the rules to carry out a provision from the stimulus law known as the HITECH Act, under which Medicare doctors are eligible to receive up to $44,000 over five years to establish electronic health records. According to the department, the new rules would strengthen patient protections by giving them the right to restrict certain kinds of disclosures and prohibiting the sale of certain information without their say-so.

Full article here:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/07/wikileaks-breach-raises-concern-privacy-electronic-medical-records/

For those who don’t know Fox News is owned by an American Citizen late of these shores (Rupert Murdoch) and reflects a political position that it would be fair to say would make Alan Jones seem like a deep red leftie!

However they point they make has considerable validity and should just not be ignored - especially when faced with a sceptical and increasingly rather alienated population who seem to be losing faith in the overall political and government systems to deliver for them.

They make the point just how well will the Government do with private Health Information if they can’t protect national secrets!

Any planning for e-Health that involves large aggregated data sets needs to be very well managed - and shown to be both well governed and well managed for there to be the level of trust we will need for success!

David.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

MyHospitals Web Site - Why Does Everything Wind Up Being So Contested?

Well we now have the media reaction to the Myhospitals web site. It seems the reviews are a bit mixed.

We have this:

Hospitals website hits early strife

  • Adam Cresswell, Health editor
  • From: The Australian
  • December 11, 2010 12:00AM

THE long-awaited MyHospitals website, allowing easier comparisons of waiting times against national benchmarks, is embroiled in controversy.

Within hours of it going live, there were claims its data was too old to be useful and the states had sought to hamstring the project.

The site, which allows public viewing of the waiting times for public and private hospitals in areas such as orthopedic surgery and emergency departments, partly delivers on Labor's 2007 election pledge to improve the reporting of hospital data.

But the figures relate to the financial year that ended in June, and permit only at-a-glance comparisons with the national average, not with other hospitals. And there are no figures on infection rates or other adverse events that Labor promised in 2008.

There are suggestions the government and bureaucracy disagree on the purpose of the new site, after federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon said yesterday it would be a "very valuable tool" that would assist patients to choose which hospital to visit.

Ms Roxon said the new site "helps the public if they're making a choice, if they've been waiting on a waiting list for elective surgery to be able to look at a hospital that might be near a carer who's going to look after them after their surgery".

However, when asked if the data would be too old to be useful, Penny Allbon, director of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, which runs the site, said that was not its purpose.

"The data is not intended to be real-time," Dr Allbon said.

and here:

MyHospitals website goes live despite data concerns

  • By staff writers
  • From: news.com.au
  • December 10, 2010 4:07PM
  • MyHospitals website goes live
  • Data on nearly 1000 hospitals available
  • Hospital-to-hospital comparison difficult

FEDERAL Opposition Health spokesman Peter Dutton has released an email that he claims shows the Federal Government's new MyHospitals website is unreliable and inaccurate.

The MyHospitals website contains data such as waiting lists, bed numbers and specialist services for more than 900 Australian hospitals.

Mr Dutton cited an email written by Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) director Penny Allbon in which she pointed out flaws in the data and indicated it could not be relied upon.

He released the email from Dr Allbon to Government officials dated July 27.

It outlines the New South Wales Government's concerns that data would be out of date by the time it reached the website, and the state's view that staff numbers and outpatient numbers should not be included in the data.

"Queensland, Tasmania and Victoria all share this position," she writes, before signing off, "Ho hum".

Mr Dutton said in Brisbane today that Health Minister Nicola Roxon must guarantee the website's accuracy.

"She can't guarantee this data is relevant, that it's timely, and that it's accurate," he said.

"Ms Roxon needs to answer these serious allegations from what is an explosive email."

But Dr Allbon said the data issues mentioned in the leaked email have all been resolved on the website that went live.

…..

'MyHospitals data manipulated'

Victorian Health Minister David Davis also raised concerns about the site before its launch today, stating some information may have been manipulated by the state's previous Labor government.

"The Victorian auditor-general has pointed directly to data manipulation occurring in key public hospitals ... so the overall quality of the data is questionable," he told ABC Radio.

But Ms Roxon said the Commonwealth had checks and balances in place to ensure the website's data was reliable.

"The material has been provided by each state and territory but it has been checked and rechecked by the Institute of Health and Welfare, an independent and very credible body," she said.

Lots more here

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/hospitals-website-hits-early-strife/story-fn59niix-1225969194016

And here

Hospitals data site under fire

Julia Medew

December 11, 2010

THE Gillard government's MyHospitals website has been savaged on its first day, with allegations of old data that does not paint a true picture of hospitals' performance.

The site, launched by Health Minister Nicola Roxon yesterday, is meant to compare emergency department and elective surgery care in 769 public and 153 private hospitals across the country.

But within hours of going live, it was attacked by doctors, hospitals and Victoria's new Health Minister David Davis, who said it had inaccuracies.

While the site makes it difficult to compare states and territories, it showed Victorian hospitals performed well on emergency department care for the sickest patients against the national average.

However, in many cases, Victorians waited much longer than the national median times for elective surgery procedures, including heart, lung and brain operations.

Mr Davis said the data was unreliable because of ongoing allegations of fraudulent reporting in Victorian hospitals - a problem he has promised to crack down on. ''We know the data has been deficient [in Victoria] and that has formed the basis of what's gone on to the federal website,'' he said.

More here

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hospitals-data-site-under-fire-20101210-18svd.html

and last (there are many more)

Questions raised over My Hospital

Information on a new federal government website comparing hospital performance has been criticised as inaccurate, just hours before its launch on Friday.

  • AAP (Computerworld)
  • 10 December, 2010 10:30

Information on a new Federal Government website comparing hospital performance has been criticised as inaccurate, just hours before its launch on Friday.

My Hospital will compare hospital performance to national average waiting times for elective surgery and emergency department care, list the medical services provided, bed numbers and whether outpatient services are available.

The website - developed by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - will cover all public hospitals at first.

However, the Victorian Health Minister, David Davis, has raised concerns some information on My Hospital may have been manipulated by the state's previous Labor government.

"The Victorian auditor-general has pointed directly to data manipulation occurring in key public hospitals ... so the overall quality of the data is questionable," he told ABC Radio on Friday.

Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, said the commonwealth had checks and balances in place to ensure the data was reliable.

"The material has been provided by each state and territory but it has been checked and rechecked by the Institute of Health and Welfare, an independent and very credible body," she said.

Roxon will launch My Hospital in Melbourne, with the website to go live from 11am (AEDT).

Consumer Health Forum of Australia chief executive, Carol Bennett, welcomed the initiative.

"Over time, transparency drives better performance and I think this is a fantastic step forward."

More here:

http://www.techworld.com.au/article/370885/questions_raised_over_my_hospital/

There is a bit to be said about all this.

First Mr Dutton just needs to relax. No minister can guarantee the accuracy of what they are given by State Governments - so his comments are just hollow rhetoric.

Second comments about looking up the site in an emergency are obviously rubbish. In an emergency you dial ‘000’ and wait for the ambulance to take you to hospital!

Third it is clear the basic idea is a good one. It is just that it has hardly been pushed to deliver yet!

If you want to get a feel for how it can be done a whole lot better and in more depth go here:

http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/

Just amazing richness of safety, and quality information including re-admission rates by disease and patient satisfaction survey results. A whole different world!

Equally in the UK a dramatically better effort. See here:

http://www.drfosterhealth.co.uk/hospital-guide/

As I said a day or so ago, just a start!

David.

Is This A Really Major Change For Health IT in the USA or Not? I Suspect It Might Be.

I think the answer is yes. And the flow on effects for Australia could be substantial indeed.

This announcement appeared a few days ago.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/pcast

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

On December 8, PCAST released a report entitled “Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward.”

The press reaction has been quite positive. Examples include:

PCAST calls for universal exchange language

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 8, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology issued a report calling on the federal government effectively to continue its work in facilitating the development of a nationwide capability to exchange health information, while specifically calling for it to promote the adoption of a common language to do so, including the use of data tagging for privacy and security protection.

In a letter to President Barack Obama accompanying the 108-page report, Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward (PDF), the council’s co-chairmen, John Holdren and Eric Lander, fully endorsed the potential benefits of health IT.

The widespread use of the technology and its attendant available data will help clinicians diagnose and treat patients, help patients take better control over their health, streamline public health monitoring, enhance the ability to conduct clinical trials, pare costs and create "new high-technology markets and jobs."

To achieve these objectives, the chairmen said, PCAST has concluded "it is crucial that the federal government facilitate the nationwide adoption of a universal exchange language for healthcare information and a digital infrastructure for locating patient records whole strictly ensuring patient privacy."

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101208/NEWS/312089965/

Here:

President's Advisors Tackle Health Data Exchange

HDM Breaking News, December 8, 2010

A report from an advisory body to President Obama recommends use of a "universal exchange language" to facilitate the exchange of health information while protecting privacy.

Use of such language could give patients more control over the dissemination and use of their medical information in an automated fashion.

Universal exchange languages for metadata descriptions, known as "extensible markup languages" are widely used, notes the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. "The best way to manage and store data for advanced data-analytical techniques is to break them down into the smallest individual pieces that make sense to exchange or aggregate," according to the 108-page report. "These individual pieces are called 'tagged data elements' because each unit of data is accompanied by a mandatory 'metadata tag' that describes the attributes, provenance, and required security and privacy protections of the data."

This means that privacy rules, policies and applicable patient preferences "are innately bound to each separate tagged data element and are enforced both by technology and by law," the report continues. "For example, a patient with diabetes may decide that her blood sugar information should be available to any of her doctors and to emergency physicians requesting that information should she have a problem while traveling in another state--but that details of her past treatment for cancer should remain private and not be shared."

More here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/President-Advisors-Tackle-Health-Data-Exchange-41491-1.html

and lastly here:

White House calls for standard language for health data exchange

By Mary Mosquera
Wednesday, December 08, 2010

The White House has called for a “universal exchange language” to enable healthcare providers to share health information in real time, in order to modernize and coordinate diagnosis and treatment while incorporating privacy and security of personal data.

To accomplish that, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should develop the technical definitions and descriptions for the standard language and include them in requirements for meaningful use of electronic health records in 2013 and 2015, according to a White House report published Dec. 8.

In the report, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), a group of presidentially appointed experts from universities, industry and other organizations, urged the adoption of standards so healthcare providers can accelerate the exchange of patient records.

The federal government has made progress in laying the foundation for adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) through the incentive program under the HITECH Act, according to the PCAST report, “Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward.”

However, information for the most part is still held captive in proprietary systems, and providers cannot share and act upon the data to make better healthcare decisions, said Eric Lander, PCAST co-chair and president of the Broad Institute of Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Among its recommendations, PCAST said that ONC should “move more boldly” to make sure that EHRs are able to exchange health information in a standard manner based on metadata-tagged data elements.

……

ONC is asking for public comments (http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__regulations_and_guidance/1496) about the report through Jan. 17.

More here:

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=75615

Now I understand fellow blogger Dr Eric Browne has more than a few reservations about the idea.

See here:

Recasting e-health in the USA

2010-December-11 | 11:35 By:

On December the 8th, 2010 the US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) published an extraordinaryReport to the President realizing the full potential of health information technology to improve healthcare for Americans: the path forward“. This report is extraordinary for a number of reasons.

Firstly, PCAST is not comprised of government bureaucrats with little technical understanding, but by some of “the nation’s leading scientists and engineers”.

Secondly, PCAST concludes that “achievement of the President’s goals requires significantly accelerated progress toward the robust exchange of health information“. The report specifically denies a requirement for any national health record; it specifically denies any need for a national patient healthcare identifier; and specifically shuns the current shift towards exchanging documents in favour of exchanging structured atomic data tagged with context and privacy metadata.

Read the full blog here:

http://blog.healthbase.info/?p=198

Now I don’t have Eric’s deep understanding of the issues he is concerned about, the rather large bunch of government and industry experts involved in developing this document suggests that pretty much all the bases would have been covered - or do I have too much faith?

Whatever is true my suspicion is that this may be a game changer.

I strongly recommend a read and making up your own mind.

(I was also amused to read that PCAST does not believe SOA technologies, so much beloved of NEHTA are up to it in the long term for their needs for Health Information Exchange!).

I note there is also a period of public comment on the document - so you can be sure that if they have it wrong they will be told! Something we could use a bit more of I have to say.

ONC wants PCAST report feedback

By Joseph Conn

Posted: December 13, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology is seeking public comment on a report released last week by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

The formal request for information was published in the Federal Register (PDF). The comment period will be open through the end of the business day Jan. 17.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20101213/NEWS/101219987

David.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Will Someone Tell NEHTA and DoHA They Are Dreaming Please!

I think it is important we all grasp just how silly this PCEHR Project is looking in terms of any reality of a sensible delivery timetable.

As an example here is what is to be delivered by end June 2012.

It is the only stage 1 that a timeframe (for capability delivery) is stated to by DoHA / NEHTA so this is all we can judge the realist of the plans from. Here is what Release 1 is to deliver.

Release 1, End June 2012

PCEHR Core Infrastructure

- Consumer Portal

- Provider Portal

- Indexing and Search Service

Strengthen Consumer Participation

- Personal Health Diary approach agreed

- Portal for Consumers to access their own health information, manage who has visibility of their PCEHR and view an access audit trail

Better Assessment and Treatment Selection

- Pathology report summary information available via PCEHR indexed GP summaries

- Radiology report summary information available via PCEHR-indexed GP summaries

Safer Medication Management

- PBS information indexed by PCEHR

- Prescription exchange service provider information indexed by PCEHR

Improved Continuity of Care

- Discharge summaries electronically sent from hospital to GP

- Discharge Summary indexed by PCEHR

- PCEHR Referrals from GP to Specialists indexed by PCEHR

Enhanced Coordination of Care

- PCEHR populated with initial static health summary view using readily available information (e.g. MBS, Immunisation, GP Systems)

- PCEHR information is available for download to local GP system upon request

Just reading this list makes me tired! In this context it is worth noting that the “Clinical processes for maintenance of richer health summary records agreed” phase does not even happen until the next phase.

Now I know the people at NEHTA and DoHA are very smart cookies but the chances of getting the sort of standardised information flows implied here between hospitals, GPs, Specialists, pathology and radiology in 18 months - given we have wanted most of this to happen for a good part of a decade - is just fanciful. A properly planned and funded 4-5 year program maybe -but not 18 months.

Remember according to the BEACH survey we hardly even have GPs fully automated - let alone specialists. This is the current situation as reported in the Australian a few days ago.

“Eighty-five per cent are using desktop systems to print out prescriptions, while 72 per cent are receiving pathology test results online and 54 per cent are also ordering pathology tests online.

While the data -- from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) survey of GPs -- confirms previously noted trends, the big shift to electronic medical record systems is a surprise.

Sixty-four per cent of GPs are now totally reliant on clinical record systems, with 30 per cent still hedging their bets via duplicate sets of electronic and paper records.”

See here for details

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/gps-switching-to-electronic-records-survey-shows/story-fn4htb9o-1225968414063

If these clinical people are to be information providers ( and just what is in it for them is by no means clear right now - other than a lot of grief) there is a fair way to go with adoption etc!

If we are going to attempt this, and my lack of confidence in the whole approach is well known, then at least start with realistic and not utterly absurd expectations.

Unless more sensible expectations are set a lot of people are going to look pretty silly - and the fallacy of a delivering a live Health Identifier Service, that is still hardly used, will be repeated. One suspects this might be the case given the heading is that this is a ‘Capability Release Plan' and it may be that they will be able to mock all this up for demonstration in 18 months time - but that actual real world availability and delivery might happen years later.

We shall see!

David.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

AusHealthIT Poll Number 48 – Results – 12 December, 2010.

The question was:

Will The Recent E-Health Summit Have a Significant Positive Impact on E-Health in Australia?

Yes - It Was Fabulous

- 9 (21%)

Probably - It Was Pretty Good

- 5 (12%)

Probably Not - Did Not Involve The Right People

- 3 (7%)

No Way - It Was Just a Talkfest

- 24 (58%)

Votes : 41

I think it is fair to say those who read here are of the view that an opportunity was probably wasted with only 33% saying it will make a difference.

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.