Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 30 April, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-265124/Do-Decision-Support-Tools-Make-Docs-Look-Dumb.html

Do Decision Support Tools Make Docs Look Dumb?

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , April 19, 2011

While interviewing sources for my story on evidence-based medicine for this month's issue of HealthLeaders magazine, one surprising sentiment came up over and over. The healthcare leaders and industry experts I spoke with said some docs don't like decision support technology because they think it makes them look dumb.

When face-to-face with a patient, these sources say, docs don't want to seem reliant on finding the answers on a computer. Is it true?

Well, one study suggests that it is. In the study, researchers read various scenarios to waiting room patients about physicians who used decision support and heeded the recommendation or ignored it in favor of a less aggressive or more aggressive treatment. Participants in the 2008 study, published in the journal, Medical Decision Making, "always deemed the physician who used no decision aid to have the highest diagnostic ability" on a five-point scale, the researchers said.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-265096/CHIME-Weighs-In-on-ONC-Federal-HIT-Strategic-Plan.html

CHIME Weighs In on ONC Federal HIT Strategic Plan

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , April 19, 2011

The College of Healthcare Information Management Executives has submitted comments to the Office of the National Coordinator on the proposed federal health information technology strategic plan.

CHIME supports the plan's goals but wants to see refinements that will increase the likelihood for effective and widespread adoption of IT by healthcare providers.

The comments are contained in an April 18 letter to Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. The letter is signed by Richard A. Correll, president and CEO, and Lynn Vogel, MD, who chairs the CHIME board of trustees.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/news/onc-will-fine-tune-technical-guides-standards-stage-2

ONC to fine tune technical guides for standards in stage 2

April 20, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT intends to fine tune standards involved in realizing stage 2 meaningful use recommendations and fill in where missing details exist during the next four months.

ONC plans to “refresh and reload” adopted certification criteria and new or updated technical descriptions to guide vendors to establish standards, said Dr. Doug Fridsma, ONC director of standards and interoperability. He described it as ONC’s health IT “summer camp.”

The goal is to make it easier for vendors to effectively encode standard functions in electronic health records (EHRs) so healthcare providers can apply the standards to meet measures in meaningful use stage 2, he said at the Health IT Standards Committee meeting April 20.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110422/NEWS/304229989/

Health IT work group considers EHR usability testing

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 22, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

At a meeting in Washington on Thursday, a work group of the federally chartered Health Information Technology Policy Committee tackled the question of whether and how it's possible to test the usability of electronic health-record systems—and opinions on the viability of such testing ranged from outright skepticism to absolute confidence.

The committee's adoption and certification work group heard testimony from an array of EHR experts, including providers, developers, testers and market watchers.

Dr. Christine Sinsky, an internist at Medical Associates Clinic in Dubuque, Iowa, said she has worked with an EHR system as both a clinician and a technical adviser since 2003. She described a litany of usability problems she has experienced personally or that have been reported to her. These included "death by PDF" when 50 scanned documents were stuffed into a patient's electronic record and needing 10 minutes for one EHR system to place an order for a mammogram.

-----

IT Drives Patient Education

Computer-generated questionnaires, medication resolution programs, and sophisticated videos are making a difference in patient care.

By Paul Cerrato, InformationWeek

April 20, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/patient/229401919

In an earlier column, I complained that IT spends a lot of time providing electronic tools for clinicians--electronic health records (EHRs), computerized physician ordering systems (CPOS), etc.--but not enough time developing tools to improve patient education.

I was wrong. Digging deeper into this area has convinced me that there are all sorts of practical technology-based resources to help patients understand their treatment and how to comply with their doctors' advice.

Simple But Effective

A closer look at the marriage between IT and patient education reveals that even simple measures can make a big difference. An innovative program set up at the Mayo Clinic is a perfect example.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/denver-health-sees-dividends-microsoft-chronic-condition-management

Denver Health sees dividends with Microsoft chronic condition management

April 20, 2011 | Mike Miliard, Managing Editor

DENVER – A chronic condition management platform, deployed by Microsoft at Denver Health Medical Center, a safety net hospital in Colorado, is helping clinicians improve case management, customer outreach and analytics – and is reducing the costs associate with the readmission of diabetes patients.

Officials say the platform could well lay the foundation for a larger program designed to encourage patients to self-manage conditions.

"The onset of an aging population and the increase of chronic diseases is adding extreme costs to our healthcare system," says Jack Hersey, general manager, U.S. Public Sector Health and Human Services at Microsoft. He points out that roughly 83 percent of all healthcare spending is on managing chronic illness, and that diabetes alone costs U.S. $83 billion annually.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/healthvault-phr-personal-health-record-medical-images-imaging-42341-1.html

HealthVault Adds Medical Imaging

HDM Breaking News, April 20, 2011

A new feature of Microsoft HealthVault's personal health records platform with supporting tools enables users to upload their diagnostic medical images from a CD or DVD to their PHR, and burn discs to share the images with providers.

-----

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2011/04/20/Electronic-records-can-speed-genetic-study/UPI-73611303345963/

Electronic records can speed genetic study

Published: April 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM

EVANSTON, Ill., April 20 (UPI) -- Time-consuming collection of data for genetic disease clues can be done faster and cheaper by mining existing electronic medical records, U.S. researchers say.

Northwestern University researchers say the arduous and expensive process of recruiting thousands of patients to collect such health data can be replaced by gathering patient information already found in electronic records from routine doctor's office visits.

In a study, researchers were able to cull patient information in electronic medical records at five national sites that all used different brands of medical record software, a university release said Wednesday.

-----

http://www.philly.com/philly/business/120339929.html

Caution urged as smartphone technology expands into medicine and health

By Jane M. Von Bergen

Inquirer Staff Writer

The airline passenger was in deep trouble - not breathing, no heart rate - when a fellow passenger, Raina Merchant, then a resident in emergency medicine, tried to save his life.

"The patient survived the flight, but, sadly, not much longer," said Merchant, who performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the passenger.

That was seven years ago.

Now Merchant, a University of Pennsylvania physician whose research centers on resuscitation, is developing a mobile-phone app that would, with one push of a button, provide oral instructions for CPR. The app would even say, "Press, press, press," to allow the right rhythm for chest compressions.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/many-ambulatory-emr-users-not-ready-mu/2011-04-21

Many ambulatory EMR users not ready for MU

April 21, 2011 — 10:18am ET | By Janice Simmons

More 80 percent of the nearly 600 ambulatory providers interviewed by KLAS who have purchased an electronic medical record (EMR) are confident they will qualify for Meaningful Use in 2011. However, additional research finds that many of those users still have significant gaps to fill in to meet the MU requirements, according the research firms latest report.

For instance, more than two-thirds of the surveyed providers--who are using 25 different EMR systems--were not sharing EMRs with patients, and nearly half had not implemented clinical decision support rules. These are two key MU requirements, reports the company, which monitored vendor performance in eight key MU areas: progress notes, drug-drug and drug-allergy alerts, computer-provider order entry, data mining tools, ePrescribing, clinical decision support rules, patient electronic access to medical records, and viewing active medication, allergy, and problem lists.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/wireless-medicine-s-promise-less-cost-better-care.aspx

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Wireless Medicine's Promise: Less Cost, Better Care

by David Gorn, iHealthBeat Contributing Reporter

PHILADELPHIA -- The future of health care is here. It just left a text message on your phone.

According to Mohit Kaushal of the West Wireless Health Institute in San Diego, the promise of wireless technology is multifaceted, encompassing a range of devices, including the ubiquitous cell phone.

"Everyone has them, across most income levels, so you can leverage them to take better care of people," Kaushal said. Take the issue of non-compliance, he said, where patients forget to take medication that could help keep them out of expensive crisis care. Physicians currently have little control over such a situation.

-----

https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/lang-en/about-infoway/news/news-releases/714

Health Care Providers Form Working Group to Maximize Value of e-Prescribing

April 21, 2011 (Toronto, ON) - A new working group of clinicians from various disciplines will help shape the future of e-Prescribing in Canada, announced Richard Alvarez, President and CEO, Canada Health Infoway (Infoway).

"Infoway greatly values the advice and knowledge health care providers have shared with us over the years," said Alvarez. "We are continuing this practice by forming an e-Prescribing Working Group, to bring leadership to our efforts to promote electronic prescribing. The goal is to contribute to the efforts of provinces, territories and the private sector to integrate e-Prescribing functionality into the clinical systems used by health professionals."

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/tiger-team-privacy-security-hie-comment-42342-1.html

Tiger Team Seeks Comment on HIE Security

HDM Breaking News, April 20, 2011

The Privacy and Security Tiger Team federal advisory workgroup is seeking public comment as it develops a privacy and security framework for health information exchange.

The workgroup has released a summary document of principles and its current recommendations, and seeks comment on remaining gaps to be addressed.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/news/privacy-and-security-panel-asks-public-feedback-exchange-trust-issues

Tiger Team asks public for feedback on exchange trust issues

April 21, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

An advisory panel has asked for public feedback on issues it should take up next as it continues to flesh out a comprehensive privacy and security policy framework for electronic health information exchange.

The framework builds on current law, specifically the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and is based on fair information practice principles, according to Deven McGraw, chair of the Privacy and Security Tiger Team, a work group of the advisory Health IT Policy Committee. McGraw is also director of the health privacy project at the Center for Democracy and Technology.

“The tiger team is eager to hear from the public about gaps in this framework that still need to be addressed,” according to McGraw and panel co-chair Paul Egerman in an April 19 announcement.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/cloud-computing-digital-signatures-speed-clinical-trials

Cloud computing, digital signatures speed clinical trials

April 15, 2011 | Mike Miliard, Managing Editor

FT. LEE, NJ – A new whitepaper has demonstrated that the use of interoperable digital identities, digital signatures and cloud computing helps accelerate the initiation of a clinical trial while lowering costs.

The study, titled Research Collaboration in the Cloud: How NCI and Research Partners are using Interoperable Digital Identities, Digital Signatures and Cloud Computing to Accelerate Drug Development, shows the results of a 2010 pilot program in which researchers at the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI/CTEP), the world’s largest sponsor of cancer clinical treatment trials, and Bristol-Myers Squibb used cloud-based IT to eliminate reliance on paper forms in clinical trials.

-----

Healthcare Providers Frustrated By Excessive EHR Alerts

The flood of notifications coming from electronic health records distracts medical personnel from addressing urgent messages about patients' abnormal test results.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

April 19, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/EMR/229401847

Clinicians say they receive far too many alerts from electronic health record (EHR) systems. In addition to test-result alerts, they get many unnecessary notifications that complicate the task of reviewing the more urgent alerts. The flood of messages--up to 150 a day--adds to their already heavy clinical workloads, leaves them with very little time for the task of alert management, and frustrates the process of providing timely follow-up care.

That's the conclusion of a research report published in the April 12 issue of BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, which evaluated how Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) personnel are utilizing EHRs.

-----

PTSD iPhone App Launches For Veterans

The Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs launch the free PTSD Coach to help veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder seek immediate help or manage their symptoms.

By Elizabeth Montalbano, InformationWeek

April 19, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/mobile/229401873

Veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) now can turn to their mobile devices for help, thanks to a new application from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DOD).

The two agencies have developed the PTSD Coach application to help veterans dealing with symptoms of PTSD. The app can link them to local sources of support and even help manage their symptoms in the moment, according to the VA.

The free application, now available via the iTunes store for the iPhone, also provides people with accurate information about PTSD, so the agencies are encouraging family members and friends of veterans suffering from it to download it as well. The agencies also plan to release an Android version of the app by mid-June.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/news/patient-data-access-will-start-pcast-exchange-vision

Patient data access will kickstart PCAST exchange vision

April 18, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT could include measures for the use and promotion of patient portals and direct access to their data in the next stage of meaningful use. Patient data could also be downloaded to a personal health record.

The portal could go a step further and give patients the option of receiving their summary information with tags that allow data to be broken down into smaller pieces or data elements and be shared as the first step toward a broad vision of health information exchange that a presidential commission outlined last year.

An advisory panel has come up with exchange uses that link meaningful use and the report from PCAST (President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology), where they intersect at the importance of engaging the patient.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2011/supreme-court-case-on-rx-data-mining-requires-nuanced-understanding-of-privacy.aspx

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Supreme Court Case on Rx Data Mining Requires Nuanced Understanding of Privacy

by Deven McGraw

On April 26, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could have significant implications for patient privacy. Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc., et al. challenges the constitutionality of a Vermont statute that prohibits the use of drug prescribing information for the purpose of marketing drugs to physicians and other prescribers, without the consent of the prescriber. The case has the potential to do real damage to privacy protections, but understanding the various risks posed by the case requires some careful unpacking of the ways in which "privacy" is -- and is not -- at issue.

Vermont legislators wanted to control the costs associated with increased prescribing of brand-name drugs and to address safety issues related to increasing off-label drug uses. So they adopted a law saying that drug companies cannot obtain data about doctors' prescribing habits and use the information to market drugs to prescribers unless the doctors have consented.

-----

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-medical-handoffs-20110418,0,7257210.story

Doctors could learn something about medical handoffs from the Navy

Mistakes commonly occur when a doctor goes off duty and transfers responsibility of a patient to another doctor. Handoffs are being studied and revamped to ensure continuity and consistency of communication and care.

By Rahul Parikh, Special to the Los Angeles Times

April 18, 2011

Consider the following story, from a doctor during his training: During a night on call, a patient he was "cross covering" — caring for during the night shift — went into cardiac and respiratory arrest. Dutifully, the resident and his team began to resuscitate the patient.

They performed CPR for well over a minute. Then, suddenly, they stopped — and not because the patient was beyond saving. Another team member had reviewed the patient's chart and learned he was not a "full code." The patient, in other words, had requested as part of his treatment plan that he not be revived should his body fail. Trying to save him had been wrong.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/privacy-bill-requires-consent-collection-personal-health-info/2011-04-13

Privacy bill requires consent for collection of personal health info

April 13, 2011 — 3:27pm ET | By Ken Terry

Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and John McCain (R.-Ariz.) have introduced a commercial privacy bill to protect consumers against the unauthorized collection, use, and dissemination of their personal information. While the bill mentions personal health information, it's not clear how it might affect health data exchange.

The bipartisan bill--the Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011--would create a framework for data use that "does not allow for the collection and sharing of private data by businesses that have no relationship to the consumer for purposes other than advertising and marketing," McCain said in a statement.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/ciotti-top-ehrs-actually-interfaced-not-integrated/2011-04-15

Top EHRs 'interfaced,' not integrated

April 15, 2011 — 9:27am ET | By Ken Terry

Many leading electronic health record vendors claim their ambulatory-care and hospital systems are integrated, but most are actually interfaced "under the covers," health IT consultant Vince Ciotti (pictured) tells FierceHealthIT in an interview. This applies to almost every vendor that developed either a hospital EHR or an ambulatory-care EHR and then acquired an EHR in the other sphere.

For example, Allscripts' ambulatory-care products are leaders in that field, just as Eclipsys' are in the hospital market, says Ciotti, a principal of H.I.S. Professionals, LLC, based in Santa Fe, N.M. Likening Allscripts' purchase of Eclipsys last year to a "shark swallowing a whale," Ciotti says, "If you're a hospital that uses Eclipsys, you're probably not going to start forcing your physicians to convert to Allscripts, and vice-versa. They're unrelated products, written by different programming teams, for different markets. They have no true integration like Epic and Cerner do, which alone run on the same hardware platforms and data bases."

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/transition-hospital-employment-will-accelerate-ehr-adoption/2011-04-17

Transition to hospital employment will accelerate EHR adoption

April 17, 2011 — 11:39am ET | By Ken Terry

The epochal shift of office-based physicians to hospital employment promises to have as big an impact on the adoption of electronic health records as the government's HITECH incentives will.

A recent study published in Health Affairs shows that in 2007 and 2008, the probability of physicians employed by healthcare systems having basic EHRs was 22 percent greater than for solo practices. In contrast, the likelihood of a doctor in a physician-owned group practice having an EHR was only 8.3 percent greater than for a soloist.

There are two underlying reasons why hospitals are buying EHRs for their employed doctors at a faster rate than private practices: First, hospitals have deeper pockets than most physician-owned practices; second, many hospitals see a need to become accountable care organizations (ACOs) in order to prepare for future changes in reimbursement. As Donald Berwick, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), recently pointed out, health IT will be a core functionality of ACOs, which will need it for care coordination and quality measurement.

-----

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/04/san-francisco-launching-new-health-information-exchange

San Francisco launching new Health Information Exchange

By: David Chiu, Arieh Rosenbaum and M.D. 04/17/11 10:45 PM

Special to The Examiner

San Francisco is on the cusp of launching a groundbreaking new health care initiative that will transform medical care in our city for the better.

The San Francisco Health Information Exchange will allow the city’s health care providers to securely and efficiently exchange patient health information. It will additionally allow patients access to their personal community health record. This program will dramatically improve patient care in San Francisco and save millions of dollars in overall health care costs.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215787/Toshiba_releases_self_erasing_drives

Toshiba releases self-erasing drives

The Toshiba Self-Encrypting Drives perform a crypto-erase when connected to an unauthorized host

By Lucas Mearian

April 13, 2011 02:50 PM ET

Computerworld - Toshiba Wednesday unveiled its first family of self-encrypting hard disk drives (HDDs) that can also erase data when connected to an unknown host.

The new Toshiba Self-Encrypting Drives (SED) (models MKxx61GSYG) enable system manufacturers to configure different data invalidation options that align with various end-user scenarios.

The new 2.5-in, 7,200 rpm drives are targeted for use in PCs, copiers and multi-function printers, along with point-of-sale systems used in government, financial, medical, or similar environments that need to protect sensitive information.

The drives come in capacities ranging from 160GB to 640GB, and have 16MB of buffer memory, and use the serial ATA (SATA) 2.0 specification, which affords up to 3Gbit/sec throughput.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/e-prescription-market-headed-2046m

E-prescription market headed to $204.6M

April 15, 2011 | Healthcare IT News Staff

SAN JOSE, CA – The U.S. e-prescription market is set to reach $204.6 million, according to a new report by market research firm Global Industry Analysts (GIA).

The research report titled "E-Prescription Systems: A US & European Market Report" announced by Global Industry Analysts Inc., provides a comprehensive review of the e-prescription systems markets, current market trends, key growth drivers, recent product launches, recent industry activity, and profiles of major/niche market participants.

It provides annual sales estimates and projections for e-prescription systems market for the years 2009 through 2017 for the following geographic markets - US and Europe. Key segments analyzed include integrated e-prescription systems, and stand-alone e-prescription systems. The report also analyzes the adoption of e-prescription systems by hospital practice and general practice. Also, a six-year (2003-2008) historic analysis is provided for additional perspective.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/page-1/MAG-264891/Imaging-Under-Scrutiny

Imaging Under Scrutiny

Cora Nucci, for HealthLeaders Media , April 14, 2011

Widespread availability of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging technology, and positron emission tomography has contributed to a surge in the use of high-tech diagnostic imaging scans in hospitals.

Despite growing concerns about long-term risks of exposure to high doses of radiation, several developments are driving physicians to order HTDI tests: increased availability of CT scanners, the superiority of CT scans over x-rays for diagnosing certain emergent conditions, and concerns about malpractice lawsuits. But the tests come with a hefty price tag. According to a report from America’s Health Insurance Plans, the cost of diagnostic imaging is growing by 18% to 20% annually. By comparison, prescription drug costs, the group says, are growing by 6% to 8% annually.

Health information technology offers a solution in the form of clinical decision-support systems. Such systems can guide providers to evidence-based decisions about which imaging tests to order and deliver benefits to patients and payers, as well.

-----

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20110417/FEATURES03/304180019/-1/videonetwork/Barriers-slow-switch-electronic-medical-records-?odyssey=nav|head

Barriers slow switch to electronic medical records

11:55 AM, Apr. 18, 2011

Thousands of patient charts fill the shelves at Kaplan Barron Pediatric Group — “paper everywhere,” Dr. Emily Johnson says.

Electronic medical records could rein in the clutter, make charts more legible and better track care, she said, but the Bardstown Road practice isn't quite ready to take that step into the digital age.

“The main reason is financial. It's just so expensive,” she said of e-record systems, which can cost $100,000 or more for small practices and millions of dollars for large practices and hospitals. “Also, we'd have to take time out of the day and do training. It would be expensive to learn this new thing.”

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110418/NEWS/304189988/

Move gradually on PCAST report recommendations: ONC work group

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 18, 2011 - 12:01 am ET

A work group of the federally chartered Health Information Technology Policy Committee concluded in a presentation delivered last week to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology that it was feasible to move in the direction pointed to by a White House technology advisory council but that the ONC should proceed by making incremental changes from its present technological course.

In December, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology issued a 108-page report that called on ONC to use its leverage to create and adopt a universal exchange language and use so-called meta-data tagging to facilitate records search and retrieval. The tags also could host privacy and security constraints that would follow the data from user to user.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110418/NEWS/304189989/

EHR reminders can help docs avoid unnecessary treatments: study

By Maureen McKinney

Posted: April 18, 2011 - 12:01 am ET

Electronic clinical-decision support reminders can successfully steer physicians away from ordering unnecessary treatments, according to results of a new study published in the journal Pediatrics.

Researchers from the Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, both in Palo Alto, Calif., built automated alerts into the hospital's electronic health-record system to determine whether they would help physicians adhere to recently updated guidelines for ordering red blood-cell transfusions.

The system alerted physicians ordering red blood-cell transfusions whenever a patient did not meet the clinical criteria for receiving the procedure. Researchers determined that the reminders prevented 460 unnecessary transfusions, for a total cost savings of $165,000 over one year.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/issues/19_4/childrens-hospital-boston-rises-to-top-of-ehr-ladder-42231-1.html

Children's Hospital Boston Rises to Top of EHR Ladder

Gary Baldwin

Health Data Management Magazine, 04/01/2011

Ask Marvin Harper, M.D., how long the electronic health records journey at Children's Hospital Boston took, and he says "forever." It's a colorful exaggeration, but the ascension of the 392-bed pediatric medical center to the top of the EHR ladder, as measured by HIMSS Analytics at least, was certainly an exercise in patience.

The hospital-one of the largest pediatric centers in the nation-deployed its first electronic systems back in the early 1980s, explains Harper, who has worked with the information systems department since the mid-1990s, the last two years as chief medical information officer. And even though additional, almost equally challenging I.T.-enabled projects await Children's, executives there can bask in the knowledge that their accomplishment of hitting Stage 7 on the HIMSS scale late last year puts them in rare company.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/patent-genes-genetic-information-court-ama-42302-1.html

Medical Groups Oppose Patent on Genes

HDM Breaking News, April 11, 2011

The American Medical Association and five other medical societies recently filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals in support of a lower federal court ruling that invalidated patents held by Myriad Genetics on two genes, known as BRCA1 and BRCA2.

The associations contend that human genes should not be considered property and enabling the patenting of genes will harm opportunities for scientific research and medical care because research on specific genes could be limited.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Now Here Is One Of the Huge Sleeper Issues in Health IT!

The following report appeared a few days ago

Health IT work group considers EHR usability testing

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 22, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

At a meeting in Washington on Thursday, a work group of the federally chartered Health Information Technology Policy Committee tackled the question of whether and how it's possible to test the usability of electronic health-record systems—and opinions on the viability of such testing ranged from outright skepticism to absolute confidence.

The committee's adoption and certification work group heard testimony from an array of EHR experts, including providers, developers, testers and market watchers.

Dr. Christine Sinsky, an internist at Medical Associates Clinic in Dubuque, Iowa, said she has worked with an EHR system as both a clinician and a technical adviser since 2003. She described a litany of usability problems she has experienced personally or that have been reported to her. These included "death by PDF" when 50 scanned documents were stuffed into a patient's electronic record and needing 10 minutes for one EHR system to place an order for a mammogram.

Work-group member Carl Dvorak, executive vice president of Epic Systems Corp., Verona, Wis., was one of several vendors to testify. Dvorak said he hoped that regional extension centers, established by the federal government under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, would provide feedback on usability issues. Although vendors don't fear usability measurement, he asserted, "I definitely think they are afraid of measurement by someone with a bias."

Most important in the construction of any mechanism designed to measure EHR systems' usability would be keeping "the voice of the physician front and center," he said.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110422/NEWS/304229989/

As background information the US Agency for Healthcare Research has done some very useful and succinct research.

This can be downloaded from here:

http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_3882_911984_0_0_18/EHRVendorPractices&Perspectives.pdf

There is more coverage here on the same area:

NIST, ONC plan measures, testing to improve health IT usability

April 25, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

GAITHERSBURG, MD – Healthcare providers may soon have guides that describe the usability of electronic health records – designed to make the steps to adopt and use health IT clear and transparent and, in the process, improve patient safety.

Among the efforts, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) is developing a set of procedures that are objective and repeatable for evaluating, testing and validating the usability of electronic health records and other health IT systems, said Lana Lowry, NIST health IT usability project lead.

NIST plans to present the specifications at a workshop June 7, she said at an informational hearing sponsored by a panel of the advisory Health IT Policy Committee.

With meaningful use, providers will expect more functionality and robust performance from their EHRs. But providers and health IT researchers say there is uneven usefulness, ease of usability and user satisfaction among EHRs

As a result, the ONC will develop guidelines to measure an EHR's usability in coordination with public and private organizations and NIST, said National Coordinator Farzad Mostashari, MD.

“All too often we hear from providers that they look forward to the day when the technology works for them instead of them working for the technology,” he said at the meeting April 21.

Usability has implications for patient safety, adoption, and effective health IT implementation and for hospital and physician productivity.

More here:

http://govhealthit.com/news/nist-onc-plan-measures-testing-improve-health-it-usability

A quick Google search for EHR and usability will also find lots more!

This is a hot topic that we have to progressively improve on how we perform over time. I have to say I am not sure it would be easy to test for usability but, rather like pornography, I am pretty sure I can recognise it when I see it!

In the report one fascinating point is made. They point out vendors see usability and key to their competitive advantage and so really don’t share their views and techniques.

That it is seen as key is a good thing - that people are keeping secrets is sad but understandable!

The PCEHR as presently planned has not even considered the issue so far as I can tell. Most of what they seem to be proposing is ‘anti’ rather than ‘pro’ usability as far as I anyone knows.

David.

Minister Roxon Is Not Really Being Honest About the PBS Costs. Talk About Not Being Able to Walk and Chew Gum!

Minister Roxon was interviewed on AM today.

The full transcript is here:

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2011/s3203248.htm

I almost choked on the Wheaties when I heard this.

Health Minister defends PBS changes

NICOLA ROXON: In a period where we are very carefully watching the expenditure of every dollar in health as well as in every other portfolio, I have made a decision that taking to Cabinet all listings that have a financial consequence would be the best way to deal with the range of matters.

And then later this:

SAMANTHA DONOVAN: Nicola Roxon is appealing to people waiting for drugs to be subsidised to understand the Government's position.

NICOLA ROXON: All I can ask patients to consider is that there are a range of other health needs that both they and other members of the community need in addition to access to medicines and our government is responsible for providing those as well and we need to be able to balance which is the most important priority at any particular time.

There is another report of the same conversation here:

Roxon says PBS listing never automatic

April 29, 2011 - 8:14AM

AAP

Health Minister Nicola Roxon says expensive drugs have never been automatically listed for subsidy and they can't be now when the government is carefully watching every dollar it spends.

She says federal Labor has to balance competing priorities in health and every other department.

The government in February deferred the listing of seven medicines, including treatments for schizophrenia, chronic pain, lung disease and blood clots, for government subsidy through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

That was contrary to a recommendation of the expert Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC).

Groups including Medicines Australia, the Consumers Health Forum and the Australian Medical Association will meet Ms Roxon on Friday in Melbourne to press for the government to reverse its position.

The PBAC this week recommended a further seven new drugs for PBS listing.

But the health minister says cabinet will consider any recommendation with a financial consequence.

More here:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/roxon-says-pbs-listing-never-automatic-20110429-1dzef.html

The PBAC is a committee made up of a very diligent collection of very smart health practitioners and economists who have processes and procedures that have served us well for 50 years or so. Only drugs that will actually help patients and are reasonably cost effective get recommened.

Now we get politicians involved for extra expenditure of a few million here and there on some drugs which can make a real difference for some patients while we have rampant, ill-considered waste and stupidity with the current e-Health plans and even more stupidity suggesting the sky will fall in if we maintain our public services properly and take just one more year to get the budget back into surplus.

I really wonder just what is going on here. If we are rich enough to do this mad cap e-health program we are plenty rich enough to provide the best medicines for those that need them. It does not make a heap of sense to me.

David.


Thursday, April 28, 2011

Maybe There Are Some Lessons Here for Australia. Very Interesting Point of View!

The following interesting blog post appeared a few days ago.

Through the Lens of Disruptive Innovation: Why Direct is a Hit and PCAST is an Outcast

Posted by Vince Kuraitis on

Regular readers know that I find Professor Clay Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation to be a useful lens to explain industry evolution. Let’s look at two recent health IT initiatives and see why one is working and the other is stalled.

Characterizing the Direct Project — why it’s working:

  1. A low-end industry disruption. The Direct Project takes transactions that are routine but inefficient — fax, telephone, mail exchanges between health care providers — and specifies standardized, Internet based technologies to conduct them electronically.
  2. Incremental change — a few specified transactions.
  3. Bottom up — ONC hired a capable project manager (Arien Malec) who choreographed a small team of volunteers working under short deadlines.
  4. Implementing “better, faster, cheaper” technology on the fly (i.e., Internet transactions replace fax, phone).
  5. Under the radar — invoking little response from incumbents. Direct was seen as focusing on transactions that were peripheral to the core EHR.

The rest of the blog including the reasons why the PCAST proposals are failing are here:

http://e-caremanagement.com/through-the-lens-of-disruptive-innovation-why-direct-is-a-hit-and-pcast-is-an-outcast/

The post refers to two articles:

The first is here:

Direct Project Rapidly Advancing Health IT Interoperability

More than 60 healthcare and health IT organizations are supporting the federal government's push for authenticated, encrypted health information to be shared with trusted recipients over the Internet.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

March 30, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/interoperability/229400609

If the Direct Project's objectives continue to be advanced at a fast clip, widespread adoption of universal addressing and access to secure direct messaging of health information could soon be provided to healthcare stakeholders that serve up to 160 million Americans.

Those are the latest figures from officials at the Direct Project, a program that began one year ago to specify a secure, scalable, standards-based way for healthcare participants to send authenticated, encrypted health information directly to known, trusted recipients over the Internet.

To keep healthcare stakeholders abreast of the latest development, the Direct Project announced March 22 that over 60 healthcare and health IT organizations, including many state-based and private-sector health information exchanges (HIEs), leading IT vendors, and several leading integrated delivery systems, have planned support for the Direct Project.

One of the vendors supporting the Direct Project is Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, a health IT provider. As part of the Direct Project, Allscripts has partnered with Albany, N.Y.-based Albany Medical Center to transform disconnected paper processes into connected, electronic transactions that improve physician collaboration and make healthcare interoperability a reality. As a result of the project, the hospital's discharge summaries will soon be routed to the patient's primary care provider via an automated exchange over the Internet. The primary care provider will also be able to refer patients to specialists and receive results back upon completion of those consultations.

The second is here
http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2011/4/18/onc-work-group-says-pcast-suggestions-not-feasible-now.aspx

Monday, April 18, 2011

ONC Work Group Says PCAST Suggestions Not Feasible Now

Recommendations made by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to create a "universal exchange language" by 2013 are not feasible, according to a work group composed of members from the Health IT Policy and Standards committees, Health Data Management reports (Goedert, Health Data Management, 4/15).

PCAST Report Recommendations

Released in December 2010, the PCAST report recommended the development and use of a universal exchange language to promote health data exchange and increase the privacy and security of information. The language would separate data into units that have a "metadata tag" with directions for how to use the data. The report said a common language framework would assist in the adoption of electronic health record systems.

The report also recommended that CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT establish a national infrastructure for patient data (iHealthBeat, 4/4).

Read more: http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2011/4/18/onc-work-group-says-pcast-suggestions-not-feasible-now.aspx#ixzz1KPgYt6qe

You can read about the theory here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruptive_innovation

As I see it success follows doing things in simple, smart and incremental ways taking on one problem at a time. This seems to work.

Going complex, large scale and requiring major re-tooling often goes badly.

I leave it to the reader to apply these ideas to e-Health in Australia.

David.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Sometimes You Just Have To Weep. This is One of Those Times.

The following appeared at 6minutes.com.au today.

Pseudonym identifier a bit Mickey Mouse

Patients may now apply for an individual healthcare identifiers (IHI) as ‘Michael Mouse’ – or any other pseudonym – but they won’t be eligible for Medicare or PBS rebates.

Medicare Australia has released forms that allow anyone who has concerns about their privacy or safety to apply for an IHI in a fictitious name, so as to conceal their identity.

The IHI service is intended as a gateway to e-health schemes such as the Personally-Controlled E-Health Record (PCEHR) due to start operating in July next year.

People who wish to have an IHI but remain anonymous can select a fictitious first name and surname, and must also give a false date of birth, so long as it is within six months of their real date of birth.

More here:

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/pseudonym-identifier-a-bit-mickey-mouse

The forms can be downloaded from the page found here:

http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/public/health-identifier/

The article and the form then have some really amazing revelations!

In the section Important things you should know about Pseudonym IHIs

1.You can only hold one Pseudonym IHI at a time.

2.You can choose to merge the Pseudonym IHI with the IHI in your real name at any time.

3. If you seek treatment using your Pseudonym IHI, you will not be able to claim benefits from Programs administered by Medicare Australia, such as Medicare and the PBS.

----- End Quote

So what this means is you can have a protected identity but no PBS or Medical Benefits for you or you can be identified and claim benefits.

This I do not believe was the intent of the Government. As I understood it the Pseudonym IHI was to allow you to be a ‘full citizen’ and be able to have a PCEHR and claim benefits - but just not to disclose your real name when accessing care. As it is reported and I read, to describe what they seem to have come up with as ‘Mickey Mouse’ really flatters the nit wits who have implemented all this.

What I suspect is an un-intended consequence of what has been done is that various records held by Medicare (PBS, Immunisation and Claims) will not be able to be linked to the ‘fake’ IHI and so will not be accessible while you are in anonymous mode.

It also seems that real IHI linked records will be held separate until you give up the Pseudonym IHI and then who knows what sort of information mess will flow. It is not clear if you can have a ‘live’ Pseudonym IHI as well as a verified IHI simultaneously. It is also not clear what IHI you would use to access the IHI and PCEHR portal (when the latter exists).

The bottom line is that the geniuses at Medicare and NEHTA need to go back to the drawing board and come up with a way to have anonymous care and a continuing link to a verified IHI and payments managed behind the scenes. That is what was intended for those who need to protect their identity and that is what should be delivered.

David.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 26 April, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment:

I hope everyone had a good Easter / Anzac Day break and observed and enjoyed the days in the way that felt right for them.

It seems the NSW Health Department under its new Minister is trying to work out just how to proceed with Health IT and how to deliver the IT systems and services for that State’s Public Health System that are still in various stages of evolution and completeness.

Victoria also seems to be making a bit of a meal of working out just what is to happen to the HealthSMART program.

As Cerner has a stake in both these programs it is probably worth pointing out that Cerner in the US seems to be going from strength to strength with the share price now well north of $US110. Given the share price was around $20 a decade ago that has been a pretty good investment! Such excellent share price appreciation certainly suggests that first Cerner is servicing its home market to the satisfaction of most (but certainly not all) customers and second that NSW and Victoria need to be careful in how they approach getting the local issues resolved - lest Cerner decide there are good reasons to concentrate on other markets and downscale what they provide here. The short term upheaval that might cause could be considerable!

No matter what happens it would be really helpful if some researchers could discover just what are the factors that lead to differences in vendor and customer satisfaction in both differing jurisdictions and with differing software. I think this is a seriously under researched and understood area.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/hospital-it-systems-failing-patients-says-expert/story-e6frgakx-1226041186638

Hospital IT systems failing patients, says expert

CONCERN at the use of Cerner's FirstNet software in NSW hospital emergency departments has been escalated by Sydney University e-health expert Jon Patrick.

"All the evidence shows this clinical information system wastes staff time and increases risks to patient safety," he says in an updated report on FirstNet.

"I can't spot any point in the workflow where there's not some fault in the system, or disruption to the way ED doctors work.

"The relevant question now is whether the FirstNet system is safe enough for use."

-----

http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=58

Can we enforce Healthcare Interoperability standards by law?

Posted on by Grahame| Leave a comment

Professor Jon Patrick says:

“It’s not enough to say we’re providing standards, we’ve got to have laws that say you cannot place software in a health environment unless it meets standards,” he said. “Then we have to test the software against the standards.”

As a consultant who works with both standards and health software development, I’m naturally very much in agreement with Prof Patrick.

-----

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/erecord-push-will-fail-without-incentives

E-record push will fail without incentives

19th Apr 2011

Mark O’Brien

GPs have warned the Federal Government its personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) scheme could be undermined – and patients left out-of-pocket – if it refuses to pay GPs for creating and maintaining the new records system.

According to the draft blueprint released by Health Minister Nicola Roxon last week, the $467 million scheme will allow all patients to opt in to a PCEHR from July 2012.

A shared health summary containing relevant details of the patient’s medical history, such as allergies and medications, is to form a key part of the PCEHR, and patients will be able to nominate a healthcare provider to create and maintain this summary.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/digitising-data-is-not-the-point-personal-e-health-records-must-do-more-than-share-data-between-computers/story-e6frg8y6-1226042444309

Digitising data is not the point: personal e-health records must do more than share data between computers

THERE'S one key question about the $500 million being spent on Nicola Roxon's personally controlled e-health record system: will it computerise the sector, sweep paper records into the bin, connect doctors to each other and give real-time access to critical medical information?

It might, eventually, but e-health experts aren't holding their breath.

The long-awaited draft concept of operations for the system reveals a simple viewing platform containing some personal health data. It's not a blueprint for a system that will take information out of manila folders and put it into dynamic formats, ready for sharing and use in new ways.

"We're spending half a billion dollars on something that holds a copy of documents held in existing medical provider computer systems," says AushealthIT blogger David More. "This approach does not facilitate clinical decision support or the sophisticated intelligence and analytics tools which deliver most of the benefits from e-health records."

-----

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/gps-axe-medicare-locals-to-free-up-health-funding

GPs: Axe Medicare Locals to free up health funding

19th Apr 2011

Byron Kaye

JUST weeks out from what is predicted to be a tight Budget, GPs have pointed the way for the Gillard Government to reach its all-important surplus: freeze the rollout of super clinics and scrap Medicare Locals altogether.

Winding back incentive payments for pharmacists to dispense generic drugs also rated a high mention in MO’s latest national poll of 150 GPs.

Asked where health spending should be cut in the May Budget, 77% of GPs nominated the super clinics program – now $630.4 million deep in promised Commonwealth funding.

-----

http://www.itwire.com/it-policy-news/government-tech-policy/46698-shining-a-light-in-victorias-major-it-projects-under-review

SHINING A LIGHT IN: Victoria’s major IT projects under review

IT Policy - Government Tech Policy

Several of Victoria’s major government watchdogs and the new Coalition government itself have taken the first steps in bringing the state’s trouble-plagued technology projects to heel, putting one flagship project on ice and scheduling others for a series of reviews that will govern their future.

Under the previous Labor government, which had held power from 1999 through to late 2010, a number of technology projects in the state had gone off the rails.

Perhaps the most high-profile of these has been the project to replace Victoria’s public transport ticketing system. Known as myki, the project was kicked off in 2002 and saw massive contracts awarded – including a $494 million deal with the Kamco Consortium in 2005. However, it gradually ran off the rails, with bugs plaguing the rollout and issues of probity being revealed in the contract process.

-----

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/ama-attacks-ahpra-complacency

AMA attacks AHPRA complacency

The transition to national registration by AHPRA has been “an absolute debacle” the AMA claims.

In a submission (see link) to a Senate inquiry into problems with national registration, the AMA says the serious disruption cannot be passed off as ‘teething troubles’ and the AMA is worried that AHPRA now considers most problems ‘fixed’ when they clearly are not.

The AMA says patient care has been put at risk because of the disruptions, and yet AHPRA still does not have business protocols in place for the unique requirements of medical registration .

-----

http://www.smh.com.au/national/patients-lose-out-in-regulation-fiasco-20110420-1dozz.html

Patients lose out in regulation fiasco

Mark Metherell

April 21, 2011

MORE than 3500 doctors and other health practitioners have been temporarily deregistered, leaving patients without Medicare payments after what had been hailed a historic advance in national regulation.

The full scope of the administrative fiasco unleashed by the new Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency is unfolding in submissions to a Senate committee inquiring into the chaotic changeover from state-run to national registrations.

John Kolbe, the president of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, said the changeover had prompted ''a number of incidents that are a cause for concern'' with specialist physicians reporting their registration had been cancelled without warning after they had failed to renew it.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/eye-tracker-research-sharpens-tools-for-e-learning/story-e6frgakx-1226041188008

Eye tracker research sharpens tools for e-learning

AUSTRALIAN researchers will use eye tracker technology to measure nurses' responses and understanding of electrocardiographs and how people interpret X-rays.

Central Queensland University has set up a world-class eye tracking facility to undertake the projects and other e-learning research.

The facility was developed at the university's Learning and Teaching Education Research Centre at Noosa, on the Sunshine Coast.

The Swedish-designed eye tracker is used largely for commercial market research, but it is also valuable for measuring the effectiveness of educational materials, according to researchers.

-----

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/pathologists-sign-up-for-e-health

Pathologists sign up for e-health

Pathologists have agreed to implement an electronic system to ensure GPs stop ordering unnecessary tests.

As part of a new five year funding agreement with the Federal government, the pathology industry has agreed to assist GPs “to better request pathology services” with a new Electronic Decision Support Tools, following concerns they are ordering too many tests.

Details of the program have not yet been finalised, but there are plans for doctors to have access to pathology services guidelines on their desktop to help them decide which tests to order.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6814/pennine-care-ditches-lorenzo

Pennine Care ditches Lorenzo

15 April 2011 Jon Hoeksma

Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust has withdrawn from taking the Lorenzo electronic patient record system from local service provider CSC.

The move casts fresh doubts about the future of the National Programme for IT in the NHS.

Pennine was meant to be the last of four ‘early adopter’ trusts taking Lorenzo from CSC; the LSP for the North, Midlands and East of England.

Installation at Pennine would enable CSC to belatedly meet contractual commitments and unlock milestone payments. Without Pennine, CSC would appear no longer able to fulfil these commitments.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/industry/6809/csc-says-isoft-deal-not-just-about-nhs

CSC says iSoft deal not just about NHS

18 April 2011 Jon Hoeksma

CSC says that its planned acquisition of iSoft is not just to shore up its NHS contracts but is about the firm’s international ambitions in healthcare.

Andrew Spence, CSC’s director of healthcare strategic development, told eHealth Insider: “The UK is important and continues to have a pull, but there will not be another national programme in the UK - while it is quite likely that there will be similar programmes in many other countries.

“The UK is a really mature market for us; this deal is really about creating opportunities for us outside the UK. In areas like Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Australia and even the US we can see fantastic opportunities.”

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/angry-shareholders-question-lynas-over-forge-sublease-deal/story-e6frg9if-1226041214374

Cohen challenge

GARY Cohen, the founder and former executive chairman of the healthcare systems provider iSoft has questioned whether the proposed $180m takeover of the company by Computer Sciences Corporation of the US has been structured to provide a special benefit to a major iSoft shareholder. On April 2, iSoft announced a recommended cash offer of 17c a share from CSC. The acquisition would be by way of a scheme of arrangement and the parties have entered into a scheme implementation agreement (SIA).

ISoft directors said the proposal arose from a strategic review initiated by the directors aimed at maximising value for shareholders and to reduce group debt. Upon completion of the scheme CSC will repay iSoft's senior banking facilities and convertible notes in full.

Oceania Capital Partners (OCP), which owns 24.5 per cent of iSoft, announced that it supported the acquisition, subject to a superior proposal.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/insight/insider-view/728/insider-view:-jon-hoeksma

Insider view: Jon Hoeksma

EHealth Insider’s editor says it’s time to be frank on where CSC is with Lorenzo; and the only way to do it is to have an independent review of progress to date.

21 April 2011

The news that Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust has decided not to implement Lorenzo after two years of trying represents a watershed moment for the Department of Health.

It has repeatedly told CSC, the local service provider for the North, Midlands and East of England, that it must get the iSoft electronic patient record live and bedded down at four ‘early adopter’ trusts to retain its National Programme for IT in the NHS contract.

Pennine was the last of these early adopters, although it was the first mental health trust to take the system that is already live – if not exactly bedded down – at one primary care trust (Bury) and two acute trusts (University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay and Birmingham Women’s).

A letter from NHS chief information officer Christine Connelly to MP Richard Bacon indicates that the DH is now looking for another mental health trust willing to step into Pennine’s shoes. Yet rather than simply seeking to press on regardless, the Department should be asking some more fundamental questions.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/383521/former_isoft_ceo_files_delay_sale/?eid=-255&uid=25465

Former iSOFT CEO files to delay sale

Gary Cohen, former CEO of health IT company iSOFT (ASX:ISF) has filed court proceedings that could hold up the planned sale of the company to CSC

Former iSOFT (ASX:ISF) chief executive, Gary Cohen, has initiated court proceedings that could delay the sale of the company, Oceania Capital (ASX:OCP).

Cohen family company RJL Investments has claimed in a filing that it is due four weeks' prior notice before Oceania subsidiary, Oceania Healthcare Technology Investments, sells around 15 per cent of its 24 per cent stake.

The delay could give Cohen time to secure a better offer than the $0.17 per share bid from US company CSC, which iSOFT has tentatively accepted.

-----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/isoft-ex-ceo-supported-csc-buy-investor-339313365.htm

iSoft ex-CEO supported CSC buy: investor

By Renai LeMay, ZDNet.com.au on April 18th, 2011

One of the key investors in troubled e-health software giant iSoft has claimed that the company's former executive chairman Gary Cohen was supportive of a buyout of the company by IT services giant CSC — despite the fact that Cohen last week filed legal proceedings in what appeared to be an attempt to block part of the acquisition.

CSC confirmed several weeks ago that it would attempt to buy troubled iSOFT in a move slated to finally give CSC full control over the company it has long partnered with in the UK Government's national health technology systems makeover. The move is also expected to bring long-awaited stability to iSoft, which has struggled financially in recent years.

However, Fairfax and News Ltd newspapers have reported that Cohen — who quietly resigned from executive duties at iSoft in August last year — was planning a counter-offer for iSoft.

-----

http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/194_08_180411/han10307_fm.html

Viewpoint

Doctors breaching patient privacy: Orwell redux

David J Handelsman, Leo A Turner and Ann J Conway

MJA 2011; 194 (8): 403-404

Legislative changes made without public discussion allow disclosure without patient consent

Of all the ethical principles underlying medical practice, confidentiality is so fundamental that its breach is an illegal, high-order betrayal of responsibility. Disclosing personal medical information without consent profoundly violates the autonomy, beneficence and privacy that patients have always rightly expected.1 Although disclosure without consent has only rarely been necessitated by an urgent threat to life or health, two recent legal erosions of doctor–patient confidentiality illustrate how privacy-invading legislation can so easily and silently harm individuals who do not form sufficiently clamorous rights-demanding groups. In one, a state government directs that private medical records be lodged in an Orwellian sounding “Central Register” without regard for the individual’s knowledge, and risking privacy breaches by seeking consent for disclosure to third parties. The other permits disclosures of a patient’s medical information against their wishes even without any urgent threat to the life or health of another person. Both represent unreasonable intrusions on privacy and erosion of personal liberty.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/nbn-sell-off-remains-an-option/story-e6frg9if-1226043497439

NBN sell-off remains an option

MANY citizens are dismayed by the federal government's failure to conduct a cost-benefit analysis on the expensive National Broadband Network.

As time goes by, the dismay of some may turn to reluctant resignation, but they shouldn't give up yet.

If the government runs full-term, the next federal election must be held by November 2013. The NBN would still largely be a pipedream then. NBN Co's corporate plan projects that construction won't be completed until December 2020. In mid-2013, only 15 per cent of premises will be able to access the NBN -- 11 per cent through fibre-to-the-premises. And only 5 per cent would actually be connected.

Fortunately, by that time, "only" $7 billion of NBN Co's $35.9bn total projected capital expenditure would have been spent.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Monday, April 25, 2011

AusHealthIT Poll Number 67 – Results – 25 April, 2011.

The question was:

Do You Believe The NEHTA Board Understands What NEHTA is Doing and How Well It is Going?

The answers were as follows:

Perfectly

- 5 (13%)

Partly

- 3 (8%)

Not Really

- 7 (18%)

They Are Clueless

- 22 (59%)

Well that is seems pretty clear with 75% thinking the Board is pretty clueless about what is actually going on!

Votes : 37

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Weekend Off Alert

Just so you know the next post other than poll results will be late Tuesday April 26, 2011.

A short Easter break!

David.