Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, May 07, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 07 May, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.guardian.co.uk/healthcare-network/2011/apr/27/electronic-health-records-cerner-isoft-emis

Electronic health records: the main patient record providers

In an updated guide to EHR software used to manage patient records, we look at market leaders CSC, iSoft and Emis

If all goes well over the next few years, most NHS trusts and boards across the UK will be implementing electronic health records (EHRs) as a replacement for the medical records paper chase that has been in place at most health organisations for decades.

In England at least, however, bringing in EHRs will have been a tough job. The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) Care Records Service, which was meant to provide a centrally-bought system for many NHS trusts, has not delivered this for more than a handful, owing to continuing delays on several fronts.

Those suppliers already involved with the CRS could lose guaranteed customers, but would arguably be left in a strong position to compete, given the years of work they have already undertaken with the NHS, and the (few) reference sites this has generated.

Cerner and iSoft are the chosen CRS providers to London and the north, Midlands and east regions of England respectively, although they also sell to trusts outside these areas.

Emis is in a slightly different position, but also has a very strong NHS presence: it is best known for supplying the majority of GP surgeries, and is aiming to add larger NHS organisations to its customer list.

Note: This is Part 1 of 2 parts covering a range of vendors (link to Part 2 at bottom) - well worth a browse.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2011/the-rise-of-social-media-and-participatory-medicine.aspx

Thursday, April 28, 2011

The Rise of Social Media & Participatory Medicine

Many have documented the shift from a paternalistic approach to medicine to a patient-centered approach, with greater participation by patients in their care decisions. The Internet has encouraged participation in health care for almost two decades. The Association of Cancer Online Resources in 1995 became one of the earliest groups to use listservs specific to different cancer types.

Now we are witnessing the rise of the e-patient, online advocates helping others to join participatory medicine. The joining of social media and participatory medicine can be observed throughout the stages of an illness, including:

  • Diagnosis and information gathering;
  • Finding a provider or second opinion;
  • Accepting a diagnosis and entering a community;
  • Participation in research; and
  • Being an advocate.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/can-usability-barrier-be-overcome/2011-04-28

Can the usability barrier be overcome?

April 28, 2011 — 1:28pm ET | By Janice Simmons

At the workgroup meeting of the Health IT Policy Committee on Adoption/Certification last week, the hot topic was usability--or rather the lack of usability at times found among current electronic health record (EHR) systems.

One point of agreement among the panelists is that usability is not a one-size-fits-all topic. In her testimony, Chantal Worzala, director of policy at the American Hospital Association (AHA), best described EHR usability as the way in which EHR products "help clinicians and others complete care delivery tasks well, efficiently and in a way that is satisfactory."

As others have noted, she said, usability is an important factor in the pace of EHR adoption and has been identified as a barrier to increased adoption. "Put simply, if a system is not easy to use, it is less likely to be used."

For EHR products that are used in hospitals, Worzala said, two levels of usability should be considered: usability of the individual product and usability of the system as a whole.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/mostashari-better-information-what-its-all-about/2011-04-28

Mostashari wants minimum govt. role in health IT

April 28, 2011 — 10:24am ET | By Janice Simmons

Farzad Mostashari, MD, in his first official public presentation as national coordinator of health IT outside of chairing internal committee meetings, acknowledged that the country--in terms of healthcare IT--is moving into an "intense phase of implementation" as initiatives supporting EHR adoption and Meaningful Use move into action.

"To some, it's a daunting place to be, but I'm thrilled. I feel we've made some great progress," he said in a speech before the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington on Tuesday. "We're hitting our mile markers, but it's a marathon," he said.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/hospital-labs-consider-sharing-reportable-electronic-data/2011-04-28

Hospital labs consider sharing reportable electronic data

April 28, 2011 — 10:38am ET | By Janice Simmons

At least 500 hospital labs--including labs from about 100 critical access or rural hospitals--could become part of a new initiative funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that would electronically connect their reportable data to public health agencies.

The goal of the initiative, called the Lab Interoperability Cooperative (LIC), is to provide services to hospital labs that would help them submit their results to public health agencies--while meeting Stage 1 of the Meaningful Use final rules.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/print/TEC-265466/Physician-Groups-Update-EPrescribing-Guidelines

Physician Groups Update E-Prescribing Guidelines

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media , April 28, 2011

Five national healthcare organizations this week issued an updated "how-to" guide for healthcare professionals transitioning from paper to e-prescribing systems.

The 2011 edition of A Clinician's Guide to Electronic Prescribing is a collaborative by the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, the Medical Group Management Association, e-Health Initiative, and The Center for Improving Medication Management, the healthcare organizations said in a joint media release.

"Whether a physician practice is just beginning to e-prescribe or is already using the technology, this guide is an important resource for all physicians," AMA Board Secretary Steven J. Stack, MD, said in the statement. "This updated guide includes information about the federal e-prescribing incentive program and can help physicians understand the requirements so they can receive incentives and avoid penalties."

-----

http://hitechwatch.com/blog/perceptions-are-nice-are-they-real

Perceptions are nice, but are they real?

By Jeff Rowe, Editor

In our perfect world, every survey would open with two questions.

Question #1: What do you think about Issue X?

Question #2: What do you actually know about it?

This desired “rule” came to mind again as we read through a list of responses to a survey recently conducted by Sage Healthcare Division. The study aimed “to understand how the perceptions of physicians who use EHR systems differ or are similar to the perceptions of the patients who recall seeing their physician use the system.”

On one level, the study’s findings might at least help policymakers and HIT stakeholders develop an awareness of how EHRs are fitting into the doctor-patient relationship. For example, in response to survey questions, “62 percent of physicians and 81 percent of patients have a positive perception of documenting patient care electronically,” while 45 “percent of patients had a ‘very positive’ perception of their physician or clinician documenting patient care with a computer or other electronic device.”

-----

http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=3576

10.8 Million Affected by Major Breaches

Federal Tally Includes 265 Health Breaches Since September 2009

April 25, 2011 - Howard Anderson, Executive Editor, HealthcareInfoSecurity.com

The federal list of major healthcare information breaches that have occurred since September 2009 now includes 265 cases affecting a total of more than 10.8 million individuals.

In the past month, 16 incidents that occurred in 2010 or 2011 were added to the tally, which the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights regularly updates. These include the largest breach on the list so far - the Health Net incident, which affected 1.9 million - and a breach at Eisenhower Medical Center, which affected more than 500,000.

Although only 11 incidents that occurred this year have made it to the federal list so far, those cases - because of the big numbers for Health Net and Eisenhower - affected a combined total of 2.5 million.

-----

Electronic Patient Consent System Planned

Given the public's concerns about online privacy and ID theft, ONC is launching a pilot project that will build trust in data exchange.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

April 28, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/patient/229402438

An e-patient consent system will soon become reality if the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has its way.

According to a listing on the Federal Business Opportunities website, ONC is currently seeking a vendor to conduct market research that will identify patient concerns as they design an e-consent pilot that will foster patient trust.

To achieve this, the vendor is asked to partner with medical facilities that are exchanging health information electronically, develop a way to obtain patient participation, identify key pieces of information relating to the exchange of health information and patient choice, and evaluate consumer understanding regarding patient consent to share their health information.

-----

http://www.npr.org/2011/04/26/135745195/supreme-court-hears-case-on-data-mining

Court Hears Arguments In Data Mining Case

April 26, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court appeared split on Tuesday as it considered a case testing state limits on data mining. At issue is whether states can bar the buying, selling and profiling of a doctor's prescription records without the physician's consent.

Government regulations require pharmacies to keep records of all doctors' prescriptions. In most states, pharmacies can and do sell these records to data mining companies -— companies that in turn sell the information to drugmakers for use in targeted sales pitches to doctors.

When doctors in Vermont found out their prescription records were being sold this way, they went to the state Legislature, and the state enacted a law barring the practice.

The data miners and the pharmaceutical industry challenged the law in court. They contend it is unconstitutional because it makes it more difficult for drugmakers to identify doctors who would be good prospects for sales.

But Vermont contends the law constitutionally allows doctors to decide for themselves whether information about their prescription habits can be sold to data miners.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/news/survey-concerns-linger-ipad-primed-healthcare

Survey: Concerns linger, but iPad primed for healthcare

April 26, 2011 | Jamie Thompson, Web Editor

iPad use in hospitals is still a contentious topic in the healthcare IT realm. Healthcare IT News asked its readers if they think the iPad is ready for healthcare, and found that for many, the time for the iPad has arrived.

Nearly half of respondents think that the iPad is ready for healthcare. Many hospitals have shown initiative in providing their doctors with iPads, and the recent launch of the iPad2 garnered praise from many healthcare IT leaders, such as John Halamka, MD.

-----

http://healthcareitnews.com/news/hospital-recruitment-has-begun-lab-interoperability-project

Hospital recruitment has begun for lab interoperability project

April 25, 2011 | Healthcare IT News Staf

ARLINGTON, VA – The American Hospital Association, the College of American Pathologists and Surescripts is seeking hospital participation for a program that will electronically connect hospital laboratories with public health agencies.

AHA, CAP and Surescripts are participating in what is called the Lab Interoperability Cooperative, a project funded by a grant funded by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The project is intended to help hospital labs meet criteria established by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology for meaningful use of electronic health records. This criteria includes submission of electronic data on reportable laboratory results to public health agencies. During the two-year grant period, the LIC will recruit, educate and connect to the appropriate public health agencies a minimum of 500 hospital labs – at least 100 will be critical access or rural hospitals.

-----

http://healthsystemcio.com/2011/04/26/healthsystemcio-com-snapsurvey-shows-cios-stressed-about-worklife-balance/

healthsystemCIO.com SnapSurvey Shows CIOs Stressed About Work/Life Balance

Posted by Anthony Guerra on April 26th, 2011

Some CIOs Feel Caught in Deep Workload

Citing massive Meaningful Use and ICD-10-generated workloads, along with an inability to escape the wireless tentacles that bind them to the office, the majority of CIOs (53 percent) are not content with their current work/life balance, according to the April healthsystemCIO.com SnapSurvey.

Conversely, in either a show of support for work they know is important or resignation to a lifestyle they know will not change, 51 percent of CIOs said they families were, in fact, content with the same work/life balance.

Probing CIO discontent further, contributing factors may be that only 16 percent work what might be considered a normal workweek (40-49 hours), with the remainder working far longer – more than a quarter putting in between 60-69 hours per week. And work isn’t just confined to a Monday-through-Friday schedule. In fact, the vast majority (65 percent) said they put in a full week, plus at least another half day on the weekend.

-----

http://www.modernphysician.com/article/20110426/MODERNPHYSICIAN/304269982/

Healthcare groups release e-prescribing guide

By Andis Robeznieks

Posted: April 26, 2011 - 2:45 pm ET

Six healthcare organizations have teamed up to develop a 56-page how-to guide on electronic prescribing. The guide includes information on meeting the federal criteria for meaningful use of electronic health-record systems—a necessary precursor to receiving federal health IT subsidies—as well as details on new Medicare e-prescribing requirements and frequently asked questions about adopting health information technology.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110427/NEWS/304279988/

Mostashari: Efficient market is biggest driver of innovation

By Jessica Zigmond

Posted: April 27, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

After nearly three weeks at the helm of HHS' Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Dr. Farzad Mostashari further described his vision for the ONC as the healthcare community works through what he called "an intense phase of implementation" of health IT.

"We're approaching the virtuous cycle where what providers need to do to succeed in the new era of healthcare financing requires better information," Mostashari said Tuesday at the Bipartisan Partisan Policy Center in Washington. "And those better information systems can then help create alternatives for healthcare financing—better payment for quality, not quantity, that didn't exist before."

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/chicago-health-information-exchange-hie-healthunity-42359-1.html

Giant HIE Planned for Chicagoland

HDM Breaking News, April 25, 2011

The Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council, a consortium of more than 150 hospitals and other organizations, has contracted with three vendors to build and operate a massive health information exchange serving a population of 9.4 million.

The MetroChicago Health Information Exchange will use the HIE platform and master patient index software of HealthUnity Corp., Bellevue, Wash. It also has contracted for the Amalga data aggregation and analytics software of Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Wash.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110425/NEWS/304259858/

Researchers: EHR data valuable in genetics studies

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 25, 2011 - 4:45 pm ET

Electronic health records can be a valuable source of relevant clinical data for genomic studies, according to researchers from a consortium of U.S. healthcare organizations.

An eight-page report on the research, "Electronic medical records for genetic research: Results of the eMERGE Consortium," was published last week at ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org

The goal of the research, according to the report's 15 authors, was to determine whether data from EHRs could do a good enough job in identifying the phenotypes—outward manifestations—of certain diseases that it could then be used in genomic studies that look for links between health conditions and genetic markers.
-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/insight/analysis/727/all-very-suspicious

All very SUSpicious

A new European directive and the UK government’s Health and Social Care Bill have reopened questions about consent for the use of data for medical research. Daloni Carlisle reports.

21 April 2011

Academics have warned - not for the first time - that the NHS is at risk of falling foul of privacy laws when it comes to using patients’ data for medical research.

A recent seminar organised by the Westminster Health Forum, which exists to debate public policy and inform politicians, discussed some of the ongoing problems in this thorny debate – and identified some new ones coming over the horizon in the form of the Health and Social Care Bill and the ongoing revision of the EU Data Directive.

Basic differences

Douwe Korff, professor of international law at the London Metropolitan University, has written extensively on the challenges for data protection posed by the internet, globalisation and ubiquitous computing – including the challenges for NHS research. And he makes the following case.

At the heart of the debate about privacy lies a simple disagreement. Family doctors and privacy campaigners have tended to argue that the confidentiality of patient data and patients’ explicit consent to its use trump all other arguments. Epidemiologists, on the other hand, have argued that using full population registers for research offers many potential benefits.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6830/trusts-miss-pseudonymisation-target

Trusts miss pseudonymisation target

26 April 2011 Daloni Carlisle

Fewer than half of NHS trusts have successfully “pseudonymised” their patient records, missing a government target aimed at making patient data more secure.

Figures from the Department of Health show that by 31 March, 186 out of 396 acute, mental health, ambulance and primary care trusts had reported successfully pseudonymising their patient records.

Under the DH’s Pseudonymisation Implementation Project, all NHS trusts are expected to encrypt patient identifiers in their data so it can be used safely, legally and securely for non-patient care, including commissioning, performance monitoring, analysing clinical trends and business requirements.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6819/scrs-for-nine-in-ten-in-darlington

SCRs for nine in ten in Darlington

20 April 2011 Fiona Barr

More than 90% of patients in NHS Darlington have a Summary Care Record, making it the primary care trust with the highest uptake to date in England.

Figures for every PCT in the country have been published by NHS Connecting for Health, showing the progress of Patient Information Programmes and the percentage of patients with an SCR.

NHS Darlington - which has a much smaller than average PCT population size of about 100,000 - tops the list of SCR uploads.

It is followed by two PCTs that were early adopters for the SCR - NHS Bury with 74% and NHS South West Essex with 68%.

Mike Brierley, head of IM&T at County Durham and Darlington Primary Care Trusts, said: “Open discussion and constructive engagement with GP practices, combined with a strong public information campaign, have been instrumental in the success to date of our summary care record projects.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/patient-portal-use-becoming-inevitability/2011-04-23

Patient portal use becoming an inevitability

April 23, 2011 — 2:24pm ET | By Ken Terry

Members of the Health IT Policy Committee, a government advisory body, recently debated whether Stage 2 of meaningful use should require the use of web portals to provide patients with online summaries of hospital visits. Most of the participants leaned against doing so for technical and security reasons. But, because of certain Stage 1 criteria, the whole discussion might become moot by 2013, when the second-stage requirements are due to go into effect.

On the ambulatory-care side, more and more physicians are purchasing patient portals linked to their EHRs in order to meet two current measures of meaningful use: providing visit summaries to at least half of their patients and giving electronic copies of health information to 50 percent of patients upon request.

According to consultants and vendors, the Continuity of Care Document (CCD) that the leading EHRs generate can meet both criteria, and can be automatically sent to a patient portal after each patient visit. Alternatively, a practice could store the CCD on a thumb drive or a CD and give that to the patient. But it's much easier to meet the criteria with a portal--and the portal offers many other advantages for both operational efficiency and the quality of care, physicians say.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/hospitals-public-health-laboratories-lab-interoperability-cooperative-42356-1.html

Lab Connectivity Effort Gains Steam

HDM Breaking News, April 25, 2011

The Lab Interoperability Cooperative, a federally funded initiative to link hospital laboratories to public health agencies, is seeking hospital participants.

Organizations must register and complete a "Phase 1 Checklist" by April 29, at labinteroperabilitycoop.org. The American Hospital Association, College of American Pathologists and networking vendor Surescripts lead the cooperative. Its mission is to help hospital labs use the Surescripts network to meet electronic health records meaningful use requirements to submit electronic data on reportable lab results to public health agencies.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110425/BLOGS02/304259999/

Advice on consent

Joseph Conn’s Blog

Either HHS or Congress must restore the rights of patients to control the flow of their healthcare information. This is a right that HHS, to a large measure, trampled when in 2002 it revised the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rule to allow the electronic movement of patient records for "other healthcare operations."

In the seven years since, I've heard every argument against consent—how hard and complicated it would be to restore it, what restoration would do to work flow, public health, and research. I take these points at face value, even though some who argue against consent have a direct financial benefit in maintaining the current consent-free environment. Still, I concede that it won't be easy to walk back consent. It will require technology, thought, public debate and money to protect privacy and preserve the promise of health IT. It, like democracy, will be an altogether messy process.

-----

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/Microsoft-to-Power-Data-Exchange-Network-for-Physicians-in-Hawaii-501629/

Microsoft to Power Data Exchange Network for Physicians in Hawaii

By: Brian T. Horowitz

2011-04-22

Microsoft's Amalga health care data-aggregation platform will provide the foundation for TeamPraxis' physician data network in Hawaii.

Microsoft has announced that its Amalga data-aggregation application will provide the infrastructure for application service provider TeamPraxis' leading physician data network in Hawaii.

Founded in 1992, TeamPraxis offers Web-based ConnxMD practice-management software as well as EHR and workflow applications. Hospitals, insurance companies, pharmacies and laboratories also use the SAAS (software-as-a-service) products.

-----

Healthcare Providers Prize PACS-RIS Integration

Clinicians want seamless integration between picture archiving and communication systems and radiology information systems and will sacrifice some functionality to achieve it, according to a KLAS survey.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

April 22, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/interoperability/229402057

Providers that are considering making investments in radiology information systems (RIS) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), say they are looking for vendors that offer not only functionality, but also smooth integration between both systems, a KLAS survey has revealed. The poll also showed that providers are willing to sacrifice functionality to achieve integration, but would prefer both.

Released Tuesday, the report--"Ambulatory RIS/PACS: Integrating Provider Needs"--relied on interviews with more than 500 provider facilities about their RIS and PACS vendors. In addition to integration, providers say other considerations weighing heavily on their decision to purchase RIS or PACS systems are cost, technology, functionality, and service.

-----

http://articles.philly.com/2011-04-21/news/29459488_1_emergency-medicine-patient-privacy-virtua

Electronic medical records systems create need for scribes to input data

April 21, 2011|By Stacey Burling, Inquirer Staff Writer

The rise in electronic medical records has given Brittany Fera, a premed student at Temple University, an "awesome" job that she had no idea existed before she saw an ad last year.

It's not the geeky programming kind of job you might guess.

The new record-keeping systems, which are touted as a way to improve efficiency and quality, slow down emergency medicine physicians so much that the doctors are hiring young people like Fera to input data for them. They call this growing group of employees "medical scribes."

The pay isn't great - around $8 to $12 an hour - but the experience for students with an interest in medical professions is hard to beat.

-----

http://healthcareitnews.com/news/study-patients-believe-emrs-bring-accuracy-their-records

Study: Patients believe EMRs bring accuracy to their records

April 21, 2011 | Healthcare IT News Staff

TAMPA, FL – The majority of patients and physicians have a positive perception of electronic documentation, according to a survey conducted by Sage Healthcare Division, a unit of Sage North America.

“The adoption of electronic health records has grown in recent years as the U.S. government’s incentive plans and the benefits of these systems are realized by more and more office-based physicians,” said Betty Otter-Nickerson, president of Sage Healthcare Division. “The CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics estimates that more than half of office-based physicians have adopted a basic EHR, while more than 10 percent have adopted a fully functional system, such as Sage Intergy EHR. The results of the study will help Sage Healthcare design solutions that maximize the benefit to physicians and their patients.”

The Sage Healthcare Insights study examines the effect of implementing an electronic health record system on both physicians and their patients. The purpose is to understand how the perceptions of physicians who use EHR systems differ or are similar to the perceptions of the patients who recall seeing their physician use the system. According to the study, patients felt more comfortable with physicians that used an EHR system, and more importantly, felt that the information contained in the medical record was more accurate when they physically saw information being entered electronically.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/news/onc-plans-efforts-develop-patient-consent-exchange

ONC plans efforts to develop patient consent for exchange

April 22, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

WASHINGTON – The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT intends to conduct a consumer electronic consent pilot as part of advancing health information exchange.

The ability for patients to decide whether they should provide e-consent in situations that would trigger it is a step that can build trust in sharing their health data and accelerate exchange.

ONC is gauging vendor interest and experience in managing such a pilot, according to an announcement in Federal Business Opportunities.

A potential vendor would develop and evaluate how to obtain feedback on patient choice in health information exchange and create innovative ways to educate consumers about options they have in providing consent in a clinical setting, whether it is automated or determined through a decision process with their primary physician in which the patient is a knowledgeable participant. The potential vendor would partner with healthcare providers that exchange health information.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/health-it-chief-mostashari-details-whats-next-for-onc.aspx

Monday, April 25, 2011

Health IT Chief Mostashari Details What's Next for ONC

In an exclusive interview with iHealthBeat, Farzad Mostashari -- the country's new national coordinator for health IT -- discussed his top priorities, why some health care organizations might delay attestation of meaningful use, the importance of engaging patients in health IT efforts and the balancing act required to ensure that Stage 2 of the meaningful use program is ambitious yet achievable.

Earlier this month, Mostashari -- who previously served as the deputy national coordinator for programs and policy at the Office of the National Coordinator IT -- was selected by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to become the country's fourth national coordinator for health IT. Mostashari replaced David Blumenthal, who returned to academia after holding the post for about two years.

Mostashari said, "I learned a lot from David over the past two years. He really has been a great leader for ONC." He noted that his selection to replace Blumenthal helps ensure that ONC can provide continuity. Mostashari said that "the administration is completely committed to the health IT agenda, to our health IT strategies, to our health IT policies, and we're going to continue moving ahead. I think that continuity is a key point."

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Friday, May 06, 2011

This Certainly Makes Sense As Reflecting Some of the Problems With E-Prescription Adoption.

The following appeared a day or so ago.

Study outlines docs' eRx barriers

By Joseph Conn

Posted: May 5, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

Tags: Information Technology, Meaningful Use, Physicians, Policy

Clunky data-management tools and the juice not being worth the squeeze in obtaining information were cited as the two main barriers to the use of electronic prescribing systems in a Center for Studying Health System Change study of 24 physician medical-group practices.

The research, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, found that physicians in most of the survey group's medical practices had access to patient formulary information, but just slightly more than half could access patient medication histories using their e-prescribing systems. The researchers found that many physicians "did not routinely review these sources of information when making prescribing decisions."

Respondents cited two key barriers to use of e-prescribing systems, according to the report: cumbersome tools to view and import data into patient records, and data "not always perceived as useful enough to warrant the additional time to access and review them, particularly during time-pressed patient visits."

According to Joy Grossman, principal investigator and senior health researcher at the Washington-based not-for-profit center and lead author of the report, "Physician Practices, E-Prescribing and Accessing Information to Improve Prescribing Decisions," the study relied on 114 interviews conducted in 2010. Survey subjects included representatives of 24 physician practices, 48 community pharmacies and three mail-order pharmacies actively transmitting and receiving prescriptions via an electronic prescribing network, Grossman said.

Not surprisingly, physicians in practices with greater access to complete and accurate data and those with easier-to-use e-prescribing systems were more likely to use these features consistently, she and fellow researchers concluded.

Lots more here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110505/NEWS/305059989/

Note that this study does not refer to the routine ‘prescription printing’ as done in Australia by and large, but the actual removal of paper from the loop entirely.

Clearly the issues raised here are ones that are important - especially the requirement for integration of as much patient information and pharmaceutical information as possible while prescribing is being undertaken.

Worth a browse to see how things happen over that large lake!

David.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

A Plea That Needs to Be Heeded in Australia as Well! Our E-Health Governance is a Disaster!

The following appeared a few days ago.

Health Care Information Governance: A New Urgency

HDM Breaking News, April 21, 2011

By Mark Vreeland, Executive Director, Advisory – Healthcare, Ernst & Young LLP

With the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act being implemented in stages through 2020, there has never been a more critical need for effective information governance at health care organizations in the United States. A powerful information governance program—one that sets forth clear structures, policies, processes and controls for managing data and information as business assets—offers significant benefits to health care organizations working to meet the new rules and requirements of health care reform.

Information governance allows for consistency of information to be used for analysis and reporting. It establishes the first line of action for data quality, metadata (the intersection between business definitions and physical data implementation) and master data management (a structured approach to managing specific data domains as master data associated with core business entities). Effective governance enhances enterprise agility by allowing for easier migration. It improves the customer's experience, lowers management costs through reducing data redundancy, offers impact analysis across the organization for change requests, and enhances the organization's ability to analyze and report on enterprise information.

On the flip side, the absence of a strong information governance program can pose serious risks to a health care organization, particularly as provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act take effect. Inconsistency in reporting and analytics can lead to noncompliance with reporting requirements of the Act. Noncompliance, in turn, could trigger substantial financial penalties for the organization.

An example of insufficient information governance at one organization

Recently, while assessing a health care payer’s analytical environment, our team discovered an anomaly that is all too familiar among payers: no one person or group at the client was solely responsible for compiling per member, per month numbers. In fact, various groups were using different definitions of PMPM and producing conflicting counts for analysis and reporting. As a consequence of a lack of governance over PMPM, the organization had inconsistencies across a number of reports and analytics. In the health care industry, PMPM is a hugely significant calculation—it affects 40 to 50 different analytical functions. So when PMPM numbers are reported incorrectly or inconsistently, the various analytical functions that rely on these numbers will be out of kilter and the situation could lead to noncompliance with reporting requirements.

Fortunately, at this organization, we were able to help them implement a program that addresses proper governance over PMPM calculations. The payer now relies on its actuary group alone to define PMPM for internal use and external reporting. This is just part of the organization's broad new effort toward a significantly upgraded information governance program.

But that's just one organization. Too many others in the health care industry are needlessly at risk because they remain stalled in an early, fairly undeveloped stage of information governance and lack momentum toward a fully realized, mature and highly effective governance program.

A framework for effective information governance

Successfully managing enormous amounts of data and creating actionable information from that data are daunting challenges for most health care organizations. Yet these challenges become far more manageable when approached under the guidance of a carefully designed framework for effective information governance.

What does such a framework look like? It consists of three main disciplines that together support the entire life cycle of information at the organization: the Business Information Discipline, the Systems and Network Discipline and the Information Asset Discipline. Each has its own unique combination of people, process and technology. And each is supported through a defined metadata management strategy.

More here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/affordable-care-act-information-governance-ernst-young-42350-1.html

The article above is talking about Health Information Governance but I would submit the problem we have in Australia is even broader than just information governance - it covers also the governance of the whole e-Health initiative in this country.

At a national level we lack the frameworks, mechanisms and expertise to create a coherent vision of how we should move forward. We also because of this do not have the leadership and political commitment to follow through on already developed plans - let alone refine and develop new and improved versions.

At a State level we suffer badly from the private / public divide and initiatives seem to somehow not reflect the desired integration of health services at the point of care to optimise the patient experience during their care journey.

At the level of Standards setting we find messiness with NEHTA, Standards Australia, DoHA and Industry lacking the overall frameworks and leadership they need to really move forward with some confidence.

We also lack the sustained and transparent funding commitments that are needed for major investments to be made by actors external to the Government Sector.

Of course we also have information governance issues also with the AIHW working manfully to get comparable and trustworthy information on the Health Sector from both the States and the Private Sector - all of which have reasons to obfuscate to a greater or lesser degree.

All in all a bit of a mess. If it isn’t fixed you can be sure the PCEHR and its support infrastructure will wind up being a waste of time and money I believe.

David.

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Another Truth We Need To Have NEHTA / DoHA Grasp. Access To Clinical Information Has to be Useful.

The following useful report appeared a little while ago

More than half of Kaiser members use PHR

8 April 2011 Linda Davidson

US healthcare provider Kaiser Permanente has achieved a 58% adoption rate for its electronic personal health record among eligible members.

HC2011 in Birmingham was told that the PHR, My Health Manager, enables 3.4m members to email their doctor, manage repeat prescriptions, book appointments and conduct other health transactions online.

Anna-Lisa Silvestre, vice-president, online services, described how Kaiser Permanente worked to promote the service but added: “What really drives adoption is that there is relevant information and transactions that people want to use.”

She said that the number of older members using My Health Manager proved higher than expected, with a 40% adoption rate.

However, the ethnicity of users was a concern, with lower adoption rates among Hispanic members than white members. Kaiser Permanente is addressing this by producing more pages on the My Health Manager site in Spanish.

Even teenagers, who have fewer health issues than older groups, have clocked up a 20% adoption rate, she said.

“Slightly more women than men are registered,” reported Silvestre. “We believe that’s because they often caregivers.”

The most-used features are: test results; “create a message” for communicating by email; “my prescriptions” for managing medications and the “appointment centre”.

Overall, the adoption of the secure messaging service in primary care has reduced the proportion of physician’s office (surgery) visits made by members.

Silvestre produced charts showing that between Q3 of 2007 and Q4 of 2010 secure messaging rose from 12% to 28% of contacts between members and the physician’s office, while visits to the physician’s office dropped from 72% to 58% of contacts. Telephone contacts remained steady at 16-17%.

Satisfaction rates among patients were reported to be high, with many patients saying that they had saved time by not having to visit their doctor and had experienced less disruption at work caused by having to attend appointments.

More with links to videos and so on here:

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6786/more-than-half-of-kaiser-members-use-phr

There was also a quite useful comment.

Comments

RAF

We are already doing this

12 April 2011 23:53

What is making KP's health record so popular is what we call EMIS Access here - online appointment booking, online script ordering, viewing of the record, and email access to your doctor. Other clinical suppliers are already offering parts of this, and with the move to interoperability, access to all parts of the record, GP, Acute, Community, could be pulled through into one portal, available to clinicians with patient consent too.

Let’s forget the costs and risks of a national database, and start to encouraging the GPs to open up all these services. It is the reluctance of practices to do this that is largely holding this back - that and the DoHA insistence on pushing for a central record instead of mandating that practices provide these services and access.

----- End Comment.

The following sentence really nails it.

“What really drives adoption is that there is relevant information and transactions that people want to use.”

What we have with the planned PCEHR is:

1. Little useful information for at least the first couple of years.

2. No support for the transactions the patient use most (secure e-mail to doctors, making appointments and so on).

The only why this can be delivered is a total re-design of the architecture of the PCEHR. This is what is needed to see any possibility of significant adoption.

The EMIS Access system (as mentioned in the comment) may offer some useful pointers.

While we are doing that re-design it might be a good idea to get rid of the ‘politically correct’ aspects of the presently proposed PCEHR.

David.

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Thomas Beale of openEHR Puts A Position on HL7 Renewal Plans. Well Worth a Read!

Thomas sent me a short e-mail yesterday to alert me to these two blog entries. Knowing that this process is a topic of interest to many who read here I pass on the links:

First we have:

What needs fixing in e-health?

or, e-health seen through the prism of an ancient pantheon of gods…

Grahame Grieve’s recent blog entry on the HL7 Fresh Look Task Force seems a good excuse for me to have another big picture look at e-health. The fact that HL7 is doing this indicates two things at least: that it thinks something is wrong in the HL7 organisation, and that it thinks something is not going right in e-health in general. That’s good to see. HL7 has been the single most influential standards body in e-health for at least 15 years. It has spent massive effort in the last decade on an effort called HL7v3, or ‘version 3′. This effort has not been a resounding success, indeed the evidence indicates the opposite. I have historically been one of the strongest critics of the technical architecture of this effort, so my statements here won’t come as any surprise. To give credit where it is due however, I have come to see that HL7 was trying to the right kind of thing, just that they lacked the appropriate expertise to do it. Solving the challenges in the area of e-health is no mean feat, and maybe some of them are unsolvable, so take that statement as a commiseration rather than a criticism.

One thing HL7 has created (whether intentionally or not) is professional networks, intellectual discussion groups and friendships. The value of this cannot be overstated: in my view, almost all good ideas come from dialectic processes, and dialectic processes cannot exist with only one person in the room. If I managed to make any contribution to e-health myself, it is largely due to having not only learned a great deal from people I met on the way (many at HL7 meetings) but from discussions and sometimes furious debates with them.

There is a huge amount more here:

http://wolandscat.net/2011/05/01/what-needs-fixing-in-e-health/

and second we have:

How could HL7 refresh?

Continuing on from the basis established in the previous post, here I will say what I think HL7 do to help here. My suggestions are as follows:

  • For practical reasons, it should keep going with HL7V2
  • HL7 should continue to exist as a meeting place for great minds, and possibly evolve into some sort of conference.
  • It should concentrate on obtaining, recording, organising e-health requirements. This probably needs its own framework and/or ontology. This is serious work and requires serious resources.
  • And from requirements, conformance criteria & models could be developed. Not the narrow ones of today.
  • if it has any pretensions of being the ‘one sole heaven’ in the intellectual design space, it will have to be far more ecumenical in how it does this.

A huge amount more detail here

http://wolandscat.net/2011/05/01/how-could-hl7-refresh/

What can one say to these two very long and I think pretty thoughtful - if not a little protective of a lot of previous work - posts.

1. I really like the recognition of the complexity and just ‘how hard’ all this actually is.

2. I think there are a range of interesting ideas and perspectives provided that are more than work an airing.

3. I think what is found here is at least a part of the agenda HL7 needs to address.

4. I think most readers of this blog need to read these for themselves and form their own views.

Thanks Tom (and Grahame) for the effort of putting this all up.

My summary is that the biggest task is to work out what is working that we should keep and then work out how to move forward from that base. It will be a great deal harder that any of us realise I suspect.

David.

Monday, May 02, 2011

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 02 May, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

It has been an interesting and rather truncated week with Easter and ANZAC Day at one end and the marriage of two young English twentysomethings at the other.

As far as e-Health as concerned there are some issues raised further down are slightly tangential but important to keep in mind. We have warnings of how systems and security can go wrong and how we need to be alert to all sorts of risks that might not be instantly obvious.

The other theme for the week seems to be the reaction to the rather fiscally tight approach to the funding of the PBS in providing reasonably priced medications to Australians.

I provided some commentary here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2011/04/minister-roxon-is-not-really-being.html

I really think those governing us need to think carefully about what is fair and reasonable and what it not and should adjust priorities to make sure we fund those things that are vital - within the nation’s capacity - and distinguish carefully between what are necessary and what are discretionary expenses. We can’t live beyond our means and we should not waste public money but we can afford, into the foreseeable future, to do the basics properly.

On that point there are some great comments from former Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner.

Tanner draws back curtain on budget conjuring tricks

April 30, 2011

Michelle Grattan - Political Editor

LINDSAY TANNER, former and well-respected finance minister, is something of the poacher-turned-gamekeeper. In his new book Sideshow: dumbing down democracy, a scathing attack of the media's trivialisation of political coverage, Tanner admits that in his time he, like his colleagues, conspired in the game.

As the budget approaches, his insights into the conjuring that goes on are valuable. He became adept at "the dark arts", he confesses, "using some of what are now the standard tricks employed to maximise political appearances".

These included switching between different forms of accounting, choosing different indicators of spending "according to which . . . suited the argument better", classifying annual spending as capital, and making commitments beyond the years of the budget period.

When you hear, for example, on budget night what the government is doing on mental health, remember Tanner's salutary warning: "It sounds impressive when the responsible minister announces that health spending is to increase by $1 billion dollars over the next four years, and it sounds even better when we're told that it will be at record levels. But there's a fair chance that we're being misled by such claims.

Full article is here:

http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/tanner-draws-back-curtain-on-budget-conjuring-tricks-20110430-1e1qb.html

Show just how the politicians will try to conn us. Not good at all!

Last - just thought I would mention the blog has now had over 250,000 individual visits and over 400,000+ page views. Thanks to all who browsed!

-----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/gppartners-open-up-on-e-health-trial-339313908.htm

GPpartners open up on e-health trial

By Josh Taylor, ZDNet.com.au on April 28th, 2011

Since signing on as a first release site for the government's $466.7 million e-health record program last year, GPpartners in Brisbane has been charged with the job of getting GPs onto the e-health bandwagon before July 2012.

GPpartners is a division of General Practice located in Brisbane, and serving 800 general practitioners, 200 GP offices and several public and private hospitals in the city. The organisation has several e-health programs such as secure messaging already in place and, according to GPpartners spokesperson Simon Carr, GPpartners was picked for the trial because of the organisation's long history in e-health.

"We have for a long, long time been supporting our general practices in e-health improvement and practice improvement," he said. "We were approaching government for some time around funding to improve e-health in our local area and as that was all happening, the e-health reform agenda started to develop. We have a great deal of experience and I think our experience with change management, and getting GPs to adopt change, is really what got us over the line."

GPpartners has employed a team specifically to visit general practices and get them prepared for the e-health transition. This begins with signing GPs up for Health Provider Indentifiers, he said, which — along with the practice identifier — is necessary for sharing individual healthcare information via an e-health record.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/384464/ama_calls_328m_victorian_e-health_initiative/?eid=-6787&uid=25465

AMA calls for $328m Victorian e-health initiative

Medical associations calls for HealthSMART to be replaced with iPads, improved medical interfaces

The Victorian branch of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has called for more than $18 million in funding over four years from the state government to roll out iPads and supporting infrastructure to doctors.

The grant comes as part of $328 million in funding the association has pushed from the Victorian Government across the 2011-2012 financial year and three-year forward estimates as a means of replacing the scrapped HealthSMART initiative and improving patietn safety through ICT infrastructure.

In a submission to the state treasurer (PDF) ahead of the budget due to be handed down in Parliament next week, the association called for all public hospital-based doctors to be provided a handheld device to be used for drug charts, medication management and patient records.

-----

http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=137

HL7 Fresh Look Task Force

Posted on by Grahame

The HL7 board has authorized a new “Fresh Look” Task Force to examine the best ways we can create interoperability solutions, with no pre-conditions on what those solutions might be. The idea is that, knowing what we now know from what has already been created within HL7 and by other groups outside of HL7, what would be our best approach to interoperability solutions?

I have accepted an invitation to be a member of this task force. It’s my belief that this is a real fresh look; none of the sacred cows are off the table for re-examination.

-----

http://delimiter.com.au/2011/04/27/vic-doctors-want-328m-for-e-health/

Vic doctors want $328m for e-health

After just a few short months in office, Victoria’s new State Government has already canned the previous administration’s plans to roll out Apple iPads to every public sector doctor in the state and placed Victoria’s flagship $360 million e-health project HealthSMART on ice. But not everyone is happy to see e-health investment so dramatically rolled back in the state.

In a submission to the state’s upcoming budget process recently published online (PDF), the Victorian branch of the Australian Medical Association has called for the new Coalition State Government to commit $328 million over four years to ICT initiatives in the state’s health sector.

“Despite the promises of HealthSMART, Victoria still does not have ICT infrastructure that caters adequately for the needs of patients. The potential quality and safety benefits of IT are not being realised, costing time and money, and leading to poorer patient outcomes,” the AMA wrote in its submission, news of which was first published by Computerworld.

------

http://delimiter.com.au/2010/04/07/vic-dental-agency-seeks-cio/

Vic dental agency seeks CIO

Government agency Dental Health Services Victoria (DHSV) has advertised for a chief information officer-level IT executive to lead delivery of ICT services to over 60 community health agencies throughout the state.

The agency — which employs about 560 staff, according to its website — was established in 1996 to improve management of the state’s public oral health services, doing so through the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne and over 60 community health agencies throughout the state.

The agency has not responded to a request for comment about whether it previously had someone in the position or whether it’s a new role. However, the group has implemented major IT projects in the past, according to a case study available online at the website of HealthSMART, a separate segment of the Victorian Government overseeing a state-wide e-health infrastructure project

-----

http://ehealthspace.org/news/nehta-confirms-use-ihi-pseudonyms

NEHTA confirms use of IHI pseudonyms

The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) has confirmed an individual may legitimately choose to have a pseudonymous IHI if there is some danger to their person, such as in the case of victims of domestic violence.

NEHTA made the statement today in response to a report yesterday that Medicare will allow individuals to register for 16-digit individual healthcare identifiers (IHIs) using false names and dates of birth.

-----

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/nz-colleagues-offer-warning-over-medicare-locals-impact

NZ colleagues offer warning over Medicare Locals impact

21st Apr 2011

Byron Kaye

NEW Zealand’s most influential GP has delivered a stark warning to the Australian Government as it prepares to unleash the first Medicare Locals: Don’t make the same mistake the NZ Government did.

Dr Peter Foley, chair of the New Zealand Medical Association, said Australia must learn from the hugely unpopular introduction of Crown Health Enterprises – similar to Australia’s Medicare Locals (MLs) – which he said had failed to ensure adequate GP leadership.

“If the [Australian] Government truly regards general practice as central to the delivery of primary healthcare… then this position must not be undermined by any top-down direction of how that might be delivered,” Dr Foley told MO.

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/preventive-care-crucial-to-unclogging-hospitals-20110429-1e0u7.html

Preventive care crucial to unclogging hospitals

Julia Medew

April 30, 2011

THOUSANDS of sick Victorians are filling hospitals each year because their illnesses are not being prevented or adequately managed by GPs and other specialists.

Statistics on avoidable hospital admissions collected by the Victorian Department of Health reveal that, in 2009-10, 180,858 people were admitted to hospital with conditions that could have been avoided with early interventions delivered by primary-care practitioners such as GPs, dentists or physiotherapists. It is a 24 per cent jump from 2000-01, when there were 145,570 such admissions.

People with diabetes complications made up the biggest group, accounting for 63,185 or one-third of all avoidable admissions in 2009-10. Dental conditions were the next most common at 16,443 admissions, followed by 14,547 admissions for emphysema and chronic bronchitis. Other conditions on the list include asthma, high blood pressure and vaccine-preventable illnesses.

Note: Health IT with Clinical Decision Support can help here!

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/national/recruitment-of-overseas-gps-threatened-20110426-1dv3y.html

Recruitment of overseas GPs 'threatened'

Kate Hagan

April 27, 2011

SIGNIFICANT delays in registering health professionals under a new national body is threatening Australia's ability to attract overseas doctors to work in rural areas, workforce groups say.

Submissions to a Senate inquiry into the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, which replaced state-based registration boards last July, reveal serious misgivings about its performance.

The Australian Medical Association said the transition had been ''an absolute debacle'' and put patient care at risk. Some doctors discovered that their registration had lapsed after being advised by Medicare, the AMA said, leaving subsequent uncertainty about whether their patients were entitled to rebates.

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/online-calculator-for-melanoma-risk-20110426-1dv5z.html

Online calculator for melanoma risk

Julia Medew

April 27, 2011

MELBOURNE doctors have created a skin cancer calculator for people to work out their risk of getting a melanoma in the next five years.

The interactive website, created by doctors at The Alfred hospital's melanoma service, is designed to alert people at risk to the need for preventive measures and relevant screening.

Victoria Mar, a dermatologist with the service, said the calculator assessed the best available evidence for individual risk factors such as age, hair colour, complexion, where you live and family history. It also asks users to identify how many different moles they have on their body.

.....

http://victorianmelanomaservice.org/calculator

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/m-gp-helpline-on-track-to-open-in-july/story-e6frgakx-1226044692183

$126m GP helpline on track to open in July

A $126 million after-hours doctor advice helpline is on track to open on July 1, although the National Health Call Centre Network is yet to sign up a service provider for its program.

A Health Department spokeswoman said the network had finalised its evaluation of tenders for the plan, announced in last year's federal budget.

"It has selected a preferred provider and is currently negotiating terms and conditions," she said.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/taxpayers-to-foot-bill-for-broadband-service-double-up/story-e6frg6nf-1226045232846

Taxpayers to foot bill for broadband service double-up

THOUSANDS of small housing estates will receive brand new temporary copper connections, which will be disconnected at a cost to taxpayers as the National Broadband Network is rolled out across the nation.

Telstra yesterday confirmed the telecommunications giant had been given responsibility to provide infrastructure for a basic telephone service in new housing estates with fewer than 100 premises.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has given Telstra scope to use fibre, high-speed wireless or copper networks to provide this service, which will become redundant when the $36 billion NBN is rolled out across the nation.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/sony-cyber-theft-a-wake-up-call/story-e6frg6nf-1226046537882

Sony cyber theft a wake-up call

THE theft of personal records belonging to 77 million gamers worldwide has prompted a security expert to warn that Australia is particularly vulnerable to computer hacking.

Internet security expert Bill Caelli said Australia did not have a law that made it compulsory to warn consumers when hackers stole their personal or credit card details.

He supported calls for laws that made it mandatory for companies to reveal hacking to those affected, with criminal provisions where personal and financial details may have been stolen.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/sonys-norio-ohga-father-of-the-cd-dies/story-e6frgakx-1226044417552

Sony's Norio Ohga, father of the CD, dies

  • From: AFP
  • April 25, 2011 11:23AM

FORMER Sony president Norio Ohga, who helped transform the music industry with the development of the compact disc format, has died at the age of 81, the company said.

The music school graduate served as president from 1982 to 1995 and led the electronics manufacturer to become an entertainment empire with a portfolio encompassing music, movies and computer games.

During the development, Ohga, a passionate baritone singer, pushed for the 12-centimetre format with 75 minutes of recording capacity to fit Beethoven's Ninth Symphony without interruption.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 68 – Results – 02 May, 2011.

The question was:

Would You Prefer NEHTA Chose Practical Quicker Implementable Simplicity Over Trying For Slower Solution Perfection?

The answers were as follows:

Absolutely

- 23 (76%)

Probably

- 1 (3%)

Possibly

- 2 (6%)

I Would Rather They Take Time

- 3 (10%)

Absolutely No Way

1 (3%)

Well that is seems pretty clear with 76% thinking we need to do more implementing and less perfecting!

Votes : 30

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Sunday, May 01, 2011

The Australian Health IT Blogosphere Is Really Taking Off With Some High Quality Voices.

Somehow the following from Montaigne seems to fit this blog post.

"I have gathered together a posy of other men's flowers, and naught but the thread that binds them is my own."

What I am taking from this development is that others are seeing that the ‘sponsored’ blog or website is rather less likely to explore some more important issues than those done for reasons of passion, altruism or simple old fashioned hope for a ‘better world’!

This is an unambiguously good thing and can only be positive in the long term!

First cab off the rank we have the following from Grahame Grieve:

HL7 Fresh Look Task Force

Posted on April 30, 2011 by Grahame

The HL7 board has authorized a new “Fresh Look” Task Force to examine the best ways we can create interoperability solutions, with no pre-conditions on what those solutions might be.

The idea is that, knowing what we now know from what has already been created within HL7 and by other groups outside of HL7, what would be our best approach to interoperability solutions?

I have accepted an invitation to be a member of this task force. It’s my belief that this is a real fresh look; none of the sacred cows are off the table for re-examination.

What’s the task force going to focus on?

I worry that the fresh look will get distracted into arguing about information modeling methodology. HL7 folks are real good at that (I am too). We do need to do that, but to my way of thinking, that’s not our problem, and we can’t get distracted by that.

Instead, I believe that we should devote time to considering how we assess “success” in a fresh look. What do we are we trying to do? What do our customers want? What exchanges are we trying to serve? Are we doing syntax or semantics? Does the market even want semantics? HL7 has two quite different stakeholders in vendors and large programs – can they agree on what they want?

Side Note: Vendors want “Drive by Interoperability”, large programs want something rather different. I think I’ll write a whole post about that (coming soon).

Note that this is an outgrowth of the v2/v3/cda taskforce – so it’s not about choosing between them. Which is why I don’t want it to be (just) about information modeling.

More here - along with a more recent entry.

http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=137

Second we have another notable contribution from Eric Browne.

Surfing the PCEHR Waves

2011-April-26 | 12:36 By: eric

Well, it’s just a little over 14 months till the launch of Australia’s Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). And we have already seen two ‘waves’ of grant funded ‘implementations’ announced by Health Minister Nicola Roxon. The PCEHR draft ‘Concept of Operations‘ was released publicly on the 12th of April and organisations and individuals have until 31st May to provide feedback. There is scant information available about any of the Wave 1 or Wave 2 e-health lead sites, but the wave 2 sites are required to submit detailed plans, also by 31st May. The eHealth sites program is being managed overall by NEHTA, under contract to the federal Department of Health and Ageing. $75.6 million has been allocated to establish and operate the eHealth sites.

In the absence of readily available and well collated information about the PCEHR implementation projects, HealthBase Australia has set up a one stop shop to help participating organisations and other interested parties – just visit http://www.healthbase.info/pcehr/ .

More here:

http://blog.healthbase.info/?p=271

Now, without trying to draw a ‘very long bow’ what I think I am seeing here is the beginnings of some real discussion and exposure of e-Health matters that go beyond the simplistic ‘e-Health is good and the Government is always right’ mantra and try to address things that actually might make a difference while at the same time being prepared to speak up and say that on this or that matter the emperor is looking a little less than well dressed!

If what we can have develop is a debate among professionals - rather than commentators - about what is needed and how to move forward then this can only be to the good of all.

There are a lot of issues that need to be addressed and the sooner the work is started to sooner we can make a difference.

I have to say it will be interesting to see just what this new HL7 review comes up with and just how much transparency and openness we get from the various PCEHR partners. We live in very interesting times indeed!

On a related matter, responses on the NEHTA Draft Concept of Operations document are due by the end of the month. If you have a view you have a little less than a month to express it!

Submissions can be made via this address:

http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/pcehr

David.