Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 11 June, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/business/31privacy.html?_r=1

May 30, 2011

Breaches Lead to Push to Protect Medical Data

By MILT FREUDENHEIM

Federal health officials call it the Wall of Shame. It’s a government Web page that lists nearly 300 hospitals, doctors and insurance companies that have reported significant breaches of medical privacy in the last couple of years.

Such lapses, frightening to consumers, could impede the Obama administration’s effort to shift the nation to electronic health care records.

“People need to be assured that their health records are secure and private,” Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of health and human services, said in an interview by phone. “I feel equally strongly that conversion to electronic health records may be one of the most transformative issues in the delivery of health care, lowering medical errors, reducing costs and helping to improve the quality of outcomes.”

So the administration is making new efforts to enforce existing rules about medical privacy and security. But some health care experts wonder if the current rules are enough or whether stronger laws are needed, for example making it a crime for someone to use information obtained improperly.

-----

http://healthcareitnews.com/news/data-mining-ehrs-help-target-dangerous-drug-combo

Data mining, EHRs help target dangerous drug combo

May 26, 2011 | Healthcare IT News Staff

STANFORD, CA – Data mining and electronic health records helped researchers at some of the country’s most prestigious universities discover a dangerous side effect of a common drug combination.

A widely used combination of two medications may cause unexpected increases in blood glucose levels, according to a study conducted at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University and Harvard Medical School. Researchers were surprised at the finding because neither of the two drugs – one, an antidepressant marketed as Paxil, and the other, a cholesterol-lowering medication called Pravachol – has a similar effect alone.

-----

http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/2011/05/chocolate-teapot-not-otherwise.html

Friday, May 27, 2011

Chocolate Teapot Not Otherwise Classified

The methodological approach which underlies this blog is based on the position of ontological realism. One standard objection from the HL7 community to this position is that the ontological realist strives for 'perfection', where HL7 and its ilk, more sensibly, strive for mere 'practical utility'.

Examination of the concrete proposals made under the ontologically realist heading prove, however, that they are (a) quite modest, and (b) of considerable practical utility.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110601/BLOGS02/306019998

By Joseph Conn

No transparency with the treasure of VistA

If you've been to Yosemite, you know the meaning of a "national treasure."

So, just imagine if the National Park Service announced plans to hand over stewardship of Yosemite to a "custodial agent." And suppose the park service put the agency contract up for bid.

Wouldn't you want to know who the bidders and their financial backers were? And wouldn't you want the park service to lay out all the bids for public inspection?

I would, too.

That's standard operating procedure. State government, counties, cities and even small-town park boards must open bids and disclose bidders in public under open-records law. It's just good civic hygiene.

Which brings us to Roger Baker, the U.S. Veterans Affairs Department's IT maven. He announced at a meeting of the WorldVistA community in Fairfax, Va., last week that the VA intends to launch an open-source development project to upgrade VistA, the VA's electronic health-record system.

For nearly a decade, the WorldVistA folks have been pleading with the VA to make open-source improvements to VistA. They gave Baker a standing ovation. Developed at taxpayer expense, VistA is both a U.S. treasure and an increasingly important global healthcare asset. And yet the VA has let VistA slide.

-----

http://www.healthcaretechnologyonline.com/article.mvc/Health-Information-Exchange-To-Test-Unique-0001

Health Information Exchange To Test Unique Patient Identifiers

June 2, 2011

The Western Health Information Network (WHIN) has received a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Pioneer Portfolio for a pilot project to test how unique patient identifiers can increase patient control over their clinical information and improve the quality of medical records. The pilot project will involve issuing personal identifiers using the Voluntary Universal Healthcare Identifier (VUHID) system provided by Global Patient Identifiers, Inc. (GPII). VUHID allows participating providers to more accurately identify patients' and access healthcare records at the time of the visit.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/deja-vu-debate-over-medicare-claims-database-heats-up.aspx

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Déjà Vu: Debate Over Medicare Claims Database Heats Up

by Kate Ackerman, iHealthBeat Managing Editor

In 1979, Jimmy Carter (D) was president, Sony released the first-ever walkman, a gallon of gas cost 86 cents and "My Sharona" by The Knack was the number one song for six weeks. Suffice to say, a lot has changed in the past 32 years.

We've seen five U.S. presidents since Carter, cassette tapes are essentially a thing of the past, the cost of gasoline has more than quadrupled and the Billboard charts now are dominated by artists like Adele and Lady Gaga.

But one thing hasn't changed much since 1979 -- the debate over whether the public should have access to the Medicare claims database.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/issues/19_6/health-care-electronic-health-records-42538-1.html

The $80 Billion Question

Gary Baldwin

Health Data Management Magazine, 06/01/2011

Four years ago, management and I.T. consultant Joan Duke's difficult lesson in health care inefficiency came to a sad end when her mother passed away. During the previous three years, Duke's mother, suffering from congestive heart failure and other complications, was in and out of emergency departments throughout Florida, while the beleaguered daughter-the founder of Baltimore-based Health Care Information Consultants-struggled from afar.

Her mother was treated at multiple hospitals, where caregivers-disconnected from one another-started treatment regimens from scratch. "Her record didn't follow her around and it was impossible to coordinate care," recalls Duke, who is now semi-retired. "There was a tremendous amount of excessive, wasteful and uncomfortable care." Her mother received over a dozen CT scans during her final years, an excess that Duke believes could have easily been avoided with electronic data sharing. "If the overall health system worked better, and had better data, it would be more efficient, deliver better care, and reduce the unnecessary treatments caused by a lack of information," she sighs.

No doubt, health care is an industry beset with staggering costs. According to numerous federal and private industry studies, national spending topped $2.5 trillion in 2009, with health-related expenses accounting for more than one-sixth of the nation's economy-and on an inflationary spiral many have described as unsustainable. Worse, by many measures, the United States lags behind in quality measures attained by countries that spend far less. Against the backdrop of fragmented care and the corresponding rise in outlays, electronic health records may indeed hold the keys to the kingdom of fiscal constraint. Washington, D.C., is betting so, with its $40 billion-plus EHR meaningful use incentive program.

-----

209,000 Doctors At Risk For E-Prescribing Penalties

Healthcare providers who don't write prescriptions electronically may be subject to a 1% Medicare payment reduction in 2012.

By Neil Versel, InformationWeek

June 01, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/policy/229700246

Unbeknownst to many medical practices, as many as 209,000 physicians and other healthcare providers may already be in line for a 1% Medicare payment reduction in 2012 for not writing prescriptions electronically. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is looking at claims for the first six months of 2011 to determine who will be penalized starting next year.

"The concern now, really, is the timing," said Robert Tennant, a Washington-based senior policy advisor for the Medical Group Management Association. "There are a lot of practices that are scrambling to come up with a solution."

The 2008 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) instituted a Medicare e-prescribing program that pays small incentives to doctors who write at least 10% of their prescriptions electronically, with some exceptions. The bonus was 2% of eligible Medicare Part B charges in 2009-10, 1% in 2011-12, and 0.5% in 2013. But deductions for noncompliance start at 1% in 2012, then climb to 1.5% in 2013 and 2% in 2014.

-----

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/053111-hospitals-compete-for-it-talent.html

Hospitals compete for IT talent with funding at stake

EHR use benefits patients but presents health care providers with hiring challenges

By Fred O'connor, IDG News Service

May 31, 2011 05:20 PM ET

Health care providers in the U.S. are encountering a lack of qualified candidates as they race to meet federal government deadlines for EHR (electronic health record) and health IT use.

The challenge, medical CIOs say, is to find enough IT staff who can help hospitals and medical practices migrate from paper records to EHRs and manage the large amount of patient data generated from practicing medicine. At stake is US$25 billion in funding allocated in 2009 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, for spending on EHRs and health IT. Medical providers will be compensated for the cost of the systems if they meet criteria by certain dates, with four key deadlines coming in the next six months.

With the government spending almost as much as the health care industry's total value of $27 billion, "you can imagine there's going to be a fair amount of hiring," said John Halamka, a doctor at and CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/news/congressional-panel-explores-barriers-small-provider-ehr-use

Despite incentives, cost is a barrier to small provider EHR use

June 02, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

The cost, physician practice size, and lack of technical resources still present barriers for small healthcare providers in adopting electronic health records and participating in the meaningful use incentive program.

Solo practitioners and small practices find it difficult to locate a lender willing to offer them an unsecured loan, said Dr. Sasha Kramer, a solo practitioner dermatologist in Olympia, Wash. Others who try to finance their electronic health record (EHR) system with the vendor have no leverage in negotiating terms because of their limited market share.

Kramer was among public and private health IT experts and physicians who spoke at a June 2 hearing of the House Small Business Committee’s health care and technology subcommittee.

-----

http://hitechwatch.com/blog/do-laws-control-clouds

Do laws control the clouds?

By Jeff Rowe, Editor

In an age so defined by technology, two seemingly contradictory assertions seem pretty safe.

First: the legal system will always be playing catch-up to technological change. Second: those who decide to use new technologies would do well to understand current law, regardless of whether or not it’s up-to-date.

Take, for example, the use of cloud computing to store personal health information.

As these attorneys ask: “Can HIPAA-covered entities (e.g. health care providers and health plans) store protected health information (PHI) in the cloud and still comply with HIPAA privacy and security regulations?”

Given the growing interest in cloud services among healthcare providers, that question will likely be on the minds of a growing number of people. And the answer, these attorneys say, is: “It depends. It depends on the cloud computing service provider and how that provider sees itself and its obligations to protect the privacy and security of the data.”

-----

http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/health-med-fit/fitness/article_84c76336-172f-5eb9-a88a-90647f5ff443.html

Lost medical records complicate Joplin hospital's tornado recovery

BY BLYTHE BERNHARD

Thursday, June 2, 2011 12:05 am

One of the less tragic but still serious losses in the Joplin tornado were the medical records scattered across neighboring towns and counties.

The tornado's path included St. John's Regional Medical Center, where five patients and one visitor died. The heavily damaged hospital will be closed indefinitely.

The circumstances of the deaths in the hospital are still being investigated. Meanwhile, medical records and X-rays have been found as far as Springfield, 75 miles away.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110603/NEWS/306039966/

Bipartisan Policy Center: Need for greater consumer engagement, more public-private collaboration in health IT

By Jessica Zigmond

Posted: June 3, 2011 - 12:01 am ET

Engaging patients through new technologies and expanding public-private collaborations are among the recommendations in a new report from the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center about leveraging health information technology to address problems in healthcare.

The report, Building a Strong Foundation for America’s Health Care System: The Role of Health Information Technology is part of the center’s health information technology initiative, which aims to identify and share policies and best practices to facilitate the effective use of health IT. At a discussion on Thursday when the study was released, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), the center’s co-founder, said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that 25% of office-based physicians have adopted some form of health IT.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110602/NEWS/306029966/

ONC seeks comments on ID management

By Joseph Conn

Posted: June 2, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology is soliciting public comments on approaches to manage digital certificates for verifying the identity of parties involved in communicating within health information exchanges.

The request is part of an effort by the Standards and Interoperability Framework, an ONC program launched in January, that seeks healthcare IT industry collaboration in addressing challenges to the interoperability of health IT systems needed to meet meaningful-use targets under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

-----

http://www.modernphysician.com/article/20110602/MODERNPHYSICIAN/306029986/

House hears about docs' barriers to EHR use

By Rich Daly

Posted: June 2, 2011 - 2:30 pm ET

Costs and lengthy installation times continue to keep most small-practice and solo providers from participating in the federal electronic health-record incentive program, according to testimony at a Thursday congressional hearing.

Both Republican and Democratic members of the House Small Business Healthcare and Technology Subcommittee said their constituent physicians have shied away from the program because of the costs involved. That aversion remains despite federal payments of up to $63,750 over six years for implementing and meaningfully using EHR systems.
-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/hhs-patients-should-know-who-views-their-ehr/2011-06-02

HHS: Patients should know who views their EHR

June 2, 2011 — 10:17am ET | By Janice Simmons

Upon request, patients would get a chance to see a detailed report of who has accessed and viewed their electronic health records (EHRs) under a proposed privacy rule released by the Department of Health and Human Services on May 31.

Under current Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules, physicians, hospitals, health plans, and other healthcare organizations are required to track access to electronically protected health information. However, they currently are not required to share this information with patients.

If the proposed rule is approved, providers will be required to inform patients that they can request the detailed privacy report beginning Jan. 1, 2013, assuming the rule takes effect. The rule comes two weeks after audit reports by HHS's Office of the Inspector General criticized current federal efforts to enforce HIPAA security provisions.

-----

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1009370

Outcomes of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection by Primary Care Providers

Sanjeev Arora, M.D., Karla Thornton, M.D., Glen Murata, M.D., Paulina Deming, Pharm.D., Summers Kalishman, Ph.D., Denise Dion, Ph.D., Brooke Parish, M.D., Thomas Burke, B.S., Wesley Pak, M.B.A., Jeffrey Dunkelberg, M.D., Martin Kistin, M.D., John Brown, M.A., Steven Jenkusky, M.D., Miriam Komaromy, M.D., and Clifford Qualls, Ph.D.

June 1, 2011 (10.1056/NEJMoa1009370)

Abstract

The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model was developed to improve access to care for underserved populations with complex health problems such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. With the use of video-conferencing technology, the ECHO program trains primary care providers to treat complex diseases.

We conducted a prospective cohort study comparing treatment for HCV infection at the University of New Mexico (UNM) HCV clinic with treatment by primary care clinicians at 21 ECHO sites in rural areas and prisons in New Mexico. A total of 407 patients with chronic HCV infection who had received no previous treatment for the infection were enrolled. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response.

A total of 57.5% of the patients treated at the UNM HCV clinic (84 of 146 patients) and 58.2% of those treated at ECHO sites (152 of 261 patients) had a sustained viral response (difference in rates between sites, 0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −9.2 to 10.7; P=0.89). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the rate of sustained viral response was 45.8% (38 of 83 patients) at the UNM HCV clinic and 49.7% (73 of 147 patients) at ECHO sites (P=0.57). Serious adverse events occurred in 13.7% of the patients at the UNM HCV clinic and in 6.9% of the patients at ECHO sites.

The results of this study show that the ECHO model is an effective way to treat HCV infection in underserved communities. Implementation of this model would allow other states and nations to treat a greater number of patients infected with HCV than they are currently able to treat. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and others.)

-----

http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110527/IT03/105270301/1001

Use of electronic health records increases

By NICOLE BLAKE JOHNSON | Last Updated:May 27, 2011

The Health and Human Services Department has doled out $1.7 billion in stimulus money to build programs to spur the adoption of electronic health records.

So far:

• More than 2,000 graduates in April completed six-month community college training for health information technology professionals and are seeking jobs.

• Regional extension centers are working with 67,000 primary care providers to become certified as "meaningful users" of health IT.

• More than $83 million in Medicaid incentive payments have been issued to eligible providers and hospitals to encourage them to adopt health IT for their Medicaid accounts, and the first Medicare payments were disbursed last week.

• Thirty percent of primary care physicians nationwide were using electronic health records in 2010, up from 20 percent a year earlier.

-----

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/digital-health-data-push-launches-wild-west-market-2011-06-01?link=MW_latest_news

June 1, 2011, 12:00 a.m. EDT

Digital health-data push launches Wild West market

Doctors face hurdles, onslaught by tech firms in converting to electronic records

LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) — Two years ago, Dr. Gonzalo Venegas decided to bring his medical practice into the Information Age.

But the move turned out to be so costly that his business, which employs five physicians, ended up on financial life support.

An obstetrician-gynecologist, Venegas and his colleagues specialize in treating women in a low-income section of Dallas. They wanted to take advantage of government incentives that would pay them back for the investment they made in digitizing their medical records.

The group installed a system from a small vendor based in Georgia, at a cost of $80,000 per doctor, or $400,000 in all. As if the capital outlay wasn’t enough, the practice now is contending with a smaller income because the doctors are struggling to adapt to new ways of treating patients. And Venegas says it looks as though he’ll only recover roughly one-sixth of his investment through subsidies.

-----

http://www.cmio.net/index.php?option=com_articles&view=article&id=28026&division=cmio

JAMIA: EHR data can help determine medication adherence

Written by Editorial Staff

May 31, 2011

Medication orders in an EHR can enhance clinicians’ ability to estimate medication adherence, but identifying definitive medication orders is a challenge, according to a brief published online first in the Journal of the American Informatics Association.

Nikki Carroll, MS, of the Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research in Denver, and colleagues developed a medication order algorithm to identify from EHRs the medication order intended for dispensing. They identified medication order data from EHR tables, obtained orders and linked the orders to dispensed medications. These steps were then used to identify patients who had been newly prescribed antihypertensive, antidiabetic or antihyperlipidemic medications and to determine the adherence group of each patient.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/collaborative-pushes-ehr-data-use-clinical-research/2011-05-26

Collaborative pushes for EHR data use in clinical research

May 26, 2011 — 4:33pm ET | By Ken Terry

Electronic health record systems are not designed to generate data for clinical research, and providers engaged in clinical trials may be using a number of different, incompatible EHRs. Yet a high-powered consortium of medical research centers, pharmaceutical companies, medical advocacy groups and health IT organizations is trying to find ways to overcome these and other obstacles so that electronic patient data can be mined for research purposes.

Known as the Partnership to Advance Clinical Electronic Research, or PACeR, the year-old collaborative recently completed Phase 1 of its initiative to create a clinical research network in New York using EHR data. PACeR aims to use the data to identify candidates for clinical trials more efficiently, and to improve protocol modeling and data collection.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/will-doctors-heed-ibms-watson-history-indicates-otherwise/2011-05-23

Will doctors heed IBM's Watson? History indicates otherwise

May 23, 2011 — 5:00pm ET | By Ken Terry

Watson, the IBM supercomputer that recently generated headlines by beating top Jeopardy players, is being groomed to advise doctors about diagnoses and treatments. But even if Watson delivers more accurate answers faster than other decision support tools, there's no guarantee that physicians will heed its advice.

When it's ready, perhaps two years from now, Watson will analyze the answers to questions about a patient's symptoms and medical history and suggest the most likely diagnoses. It will use the same approach to recommend treatments.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/ehrs-needed-comparative-effectiveness-research-too/2011-05-28

EHRs needed for comparative effectiveness research, too

May 28, 2011 — 5:19pm ET | By Ken Terry

A year-old consortium of academic medical centers, pharmaceutical companies, and information technology firms is trying to find a way to harness electronic health records for clinical research. The Partnership to Advance Clinical Electronic Research (PACeR) is to be commended for its efforts, which could help researchers identify clinical trial subjects and improve protocol modeling and data collection.

As important as this undertaking is, however, there's another project that could have a far greater and more immediate impact on public health. In contrast to PACeR, this project is receiving no private funding, because it won't help any drug company make money. What I'm referring to is the use of EHRs in comparative effectiveness research (CER). What's most urgently needed now is to set up "pragmatic clinical trials" that compare the efficacy of different tests and treatments in typical practice situations, so that physicians will be likely to incorporate the results into their medical decisions.

-----

http://www.care2.com/causes/health-policy/blog/how-private-are-electronic-health-care-records/

How Private Are Electronic Health Care Records?

posted by: Kristina Chew

There are many arguments in favor of electronic health care records, including fewer medical errors and reduced costs, not to mention the sheer amount of paper saved. Unfortunately, such electronic records are not nearly as secure as we would like, especially considering the highly personal information in medical records, from Social Security numbers to mention of pre-existing conditions to notation of what medications you are taking. Recently the likes of Lockheed Martin, PBS and Sony have all had their websites hacked and, as it turns out, electronic health care records are just as vulnerable.

The US government's Office of Civil Rights has a website dubbed the "wall of shame" on which are listed some 300 hospitals, doctors and insurance companies who have reported significant breaches of medical privacy in the past few years. A quick skim through the list reveals that huge HMOs such as Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Medical Center have all suffered security breaches of medical records. These have occurred through the loss or theft of a laptop or other portable electronic device (an employee of Massachusetts General Hospital left the paper records of 192 patients on a Boston subway train in March); improper disposal of records; hacking and the unauthorized accessing of computer records.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/news/government-agencies-eye-hybrid-clouds-future

Government agencies eye hybrid clouds for the future

May 24, 2011 | Tom Sullivan, Editor

Of the three most common cloud computing models – public, private and hybrid – government agencies are planning to adopt the hybrid model more than others. But an alarmingly high percentage of agencies aren't thinking about how to get their data back should they need to.

That’s according to a Norwich University study commissioned by Quest Software.

“What was most striking to me was that government and higher ed IT professionals have clearly expressed their preference for private and hybrid cloud models,” said William Clements, PhD, dean and professor at the School of Graduate and Continuing Studies at Norwich University.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/blogs/health-care-reform-accountable-care-organization-42535-1.html

Why Health Care Reform Won't Work

Joseph Goedert

Health Data Management Blogs, May 27, 2011

I recently had my 50+ physical with all the blood work that goes with it. While I have a high-deductible health plan with a health savings account, the labs are supposed to be fully paid by my insurer as preventive care. But the lab order wasn't properly coded and I was billed for about $400.

My regional hospital where the labs were done told me to call my physician and ask her to resubmit the order coded to indicate preventive care. I asked why the hospital doesn't just call its affiliated provider and was told they don't do that. So I called my physician's office, explained which codes had to go where and asked to resubmit the order. The office did so, incorrectly, again.

My hospital called again and insisted it was my obligation to make sure the paperwork was properly submitted. Another request that someone at the hospital pick up the phone and call an affiliated physician was refused.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6903/maudsley-builds-phr-on-healthvault

Maudsley builds PHR on HealthVault

26 May 2011 Lyn Whitfield

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust is to develop an online personal health record to encourage clinicians and patients to share information, based on the Microsoft HealthVault platform.

The mental health trust, which provides treatment to a population of 1.1m people in south London, plans to develop a web portal that uses HealthVault to give patients access to health records and new applications to help them manage their condition.

The portal will interface with the trust’s own Electronic Patient Journey System, which was developed with Strand Technology, which has become an approved HealthVault partner for the project.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6908/wales-issues-strategy-for-gp-it

Wales issues strategy for GP IT

27 May 2011 Fiona Barr

NHS Wales has published a new five year strategy for GP clinical systems, setting out plans to standardise GP infrastructure services, improve interoperability and migrate GPs to web-based technologies.

The strategy follows the publication earlier this week of a tender for a new framework to supply GP practices in Wales with IT systems. The NHS Wales Informatics Service is seeking three suppliers to deliver systems to GPs from 2012.

The Service said the latest strategy has been produced in consultation with a range of stakeholders, including both the BMA and the Royal College of GPs.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/mobile/6906/nhs-direct-launches-mobile-apps

NHS Direct launches mobile apps

27 May 2011 Shanna Crispin

NHS Direct has launched an application enabling people to access its health advice via their mobile.

The 24 hour helpline service has developed an application for Android smartphones and says that an application for the iPhone is likely to be released next month.

The smartphone version can be downloaded from the Android Marketplace or from the Android app store on the phone, for free.

Once downloaded, people can access 37 NHS Direct health and symptom checkers, which cover everything from dental pain, diarrhoea and vomiting to rashes, back pain and burns.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Friday, June 10, 2011

The US Seems To Have Drifted A Bit of Course Here!

The following editorial appeared a few days ago in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Editorial

Prescriptions, Privacy, and the First Amendment

NEJM | April 27, 2011 | Topics: Health Law

Gregory D. Curfman, M.D., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D.

On April 26, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that, when it is decided this spring, will have important repercussions for the practice of medicine. At issue in William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, et al., Petitioners v. IMS Health Inc., et al. 1 is whether detailed information about prescriptions written by doctors, with the doctor identified, can be bought and sold. Currently, this practice is legal in almost every state, and the outcome of Sorrell v. IMS Health will signal whether states may restrict it.2

This is the way it works: Retail pharmacies retain information about all drug prescriptions that they fill, including the patient’s name, the identification of the prescriber, the name, dosage, and quantity of the prescribed drug, and the date the prescription was filled. This information is collected, along with the patient’s age, sex, and drug history, and sold, with the individual prescribing doctors identified but the patient’s names encrypted, to data-mining companies (IMS Health is one such company). The data-mining companies then further process the information by collating each physician’s prescribing history for each patient, and they sell it to pharmaceutical companies. The prescribing information of individual doctors can be linked to the Physician Masterfile of the American Medical Association (AMA), thereby enriching the data on prescribing physicians (the Masterfile, which is sold by the AMA, includes information on every physician’s education, licensure, certification, hospital privileges, and practice details). The companies’ marketing departments use the information to develop strategies to sell drugs to individual doctors, and the schemes are applied by pharmaceutical sales representatives (“detailers”) to make pitches to the doctors in their offices. These solicitations are not intended to communicate evidence-based information to doctors; they are intended to sell expensive drugs.3

It is a very successful business. When drug detailers have the prescribing history of the physicians they are visiting, they sell more drugs. This is one of the principal reasons why the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the trade organization of the pharmaceutical industry, joined the data miners as a party to the lawsuit. It is quite clear who profits from the sale of the prescribing information: retail pharmacies, data-mining companies, drug companies, and the AMA. In the end, the costs are passed along to patients, and physicians’ prescribing practices are manipulated by drug salespeople who know the details of their interactions with their patients.

.....

In Sorrell v. IMS Health, we have sided with the state of Vermont, and we have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the appropriateness of the statute to protect the privacy rights of physicians and patients.9 We do not believe that the organizations challenging the Prescription Confidentiality Law are engaging in speech that warrants First Amendment protection. Rather, they are selling highly sensitive medical information as a mere commodity without consent. We are concerned that such selling of prescribing data to pharmaceutical companies results in the manipulation of physicians’ drug-prescribing practices, unwarranted intrusion into the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship, and an increase in costs at a time when our health care system is under unprecedented financial strain. Furthermore, the technique used to de-identify patient information is flawed (and is often performed with the use of software provided by the data-mining companies themselves), and the risk of re-identification poses a serious threat to the confidentiality of patient information.3,10 A patient’s drug history provides clear insight into that patient’s medical history. Therefore, we believe a finding by the Supreme Court overturning the action of the Vermont legislature in this case would have serious negative consequences for the practice of medicine and for the public health. Such a finding could also open the door to legal challenges to other reasonable restrictions on the marketing practices of pharmaceutical companies, including the current prohibition of the promotion of off-label uses of prescription drugs.11

The full editorial and references are freely available here:

http://healthpolicyandreform.nejm.org/?p=14334&query=TOC

This is really an important issue and I have to say I hope the wishes of the Editorial Writers are taken very seriously indeed.

We have had sales of some prescription information in Australia over the years and just as in the US this has made many Australian clinicians quite unhappy.

In Australia we really need to make sure that, in my view, we don’t go down the path the US has followed so far and it really would be a really good idea if this sort of activity was wound way back over there - First Amendment or not!

David.

Thursday, June 09, 2011

NEHTA and DoHA Have a Big Job of Reading and Responding to the Submissions on the PCEHR ConOps.

The following few articles appeared in the last day or so.

First we have:

PCEHR deadline too tight, says MSIA

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • June 08, 2011 6:16PM

THE Medical Software Industry Association says the "extremely tight" July 2012 deadline for the start of the $500 million personally controlled e-health record program risks patient safety as there is little time to ensure new software is free of bugs.

The MSIA highlighted glaring holes in Labor's e-health proposal in its submission to a government consultation on the PCEHR.

"The timeline to develop, test and deploy software to support the PCEHR is extraordinarily short," it warns. "Many different changes are required in many different settings, and there will be safety issues unless great care is taken to ensure software is fit for clinical use."

"Key elements that are missing include the Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT), the Healthcare Identifiers service and the National Authentication Service for Health -- described in the draft concept of operations as ‘existing’ -- yet to date not one of these enablers is being used ‘live’ in any broad clinical setting," it said in its submission to the Health department on the draft concept of operations (ConOps) for the PCEHR.

"There is no timeline that tells us when these will be ready, and their availability is dependent on the (outcome) of work by the National E-Health Transition Authority and other third parties.

"But without documented delivery dates, it is impossible for software-makers to schedule their development, testing and implementation work."

NEHTA chief executive
Peter Fleming last week told a Senate estimates hearing that each of the PCEHR components was "tracking to its critical path".

At a separate session, Medicare’s deputy chief executive, health, Malisa Golightly, said the identifiers service "is operating. It is ticking along", confirming there were no particular problems.

But in February, the Health department
banned the use of the $90m HI service in any live environment due to concerns over the system’s safety.

Declared live by Health Minister Nicola Roxon last July, it has been sitting idle while software interface specifications and compliance issues are thrashed out.

The Australian understands some progress has been made, with a number of vendors signing to access Medicare’s HI testing environments, but licence conditions are still to be agreed.

The MSIA refers to this in its submission, saying: "There needs to be a clear indication of responsibilities, relationships and governance for all the agencies involved. This includes liability issues for information provided by government or its managing agent for the HI or the AMT, for example."

It is also seeking recognition of the need for a commercially sustainable model for software makers.

"There is no indication there will be any satisfactory agreement with current vendors to ensure that their systems will interoperate with the PCEHR in order to receive and send patient information in a safe and secure way," it said.

Lots more here:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/pcehr-deadline-too-tight-says-msia/story-e6frgakx-1226071911711

Next we have:

GPs need funding for e-health data quality

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au on June 8th, 2011

The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) has recommended that GPs be allocated more funding from Medicare to balance out extra time they will need to spend managing a patient's electronic health record.

The government hopes to have personally controlled electronic health records (PCEHR) up and running by mid next year. Different medical providers will contribute to the record, which will not be stored together, but use indices to link information.

The college warned in a submission to a Concept of Operations for the scheme that as the record will draw on data from multiple sources, contradictions or incorrect information could make its way into the record.

The college suggested that all professions that were able to contribute to a patient's consolidated view should have to undergo a "formal clinical safety assessment" conducted by an approved authority, such as the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.

However, the college also said it was important that a healthcare organisation ensured the accuracy of the information in the patient's e-health consolidated view and shared health summary, which should be carried out by the patient's nominated provider. It said that the GP was the "best-placed health professional to assume the role of nominated provider", and indeed believed that unless the patient said otherwise, their usual GP should be the default nominated provider.

The work required to complete this task "must not be underestimated", according to the college.

"IT is the RACGP's belief that the nominated healthcare provider will be burdened with substantial risk and considerable time spent on validating and updating the information in the Shared Health Summary," it said.

RACGP hoped the government would recognise the need for funding to GPs to manage the record, and not just to implement it, with funding required for training and education and a quality assurance process. In addition, the benefits of the record will flow to other health professionals more than to GPs, the college said.

"Accordingly, the RACGP would urge that government consider appropriate amendments to the Medicare Benefits Schedule to recognise the additional work general practitioners will undertake in consultations initiating and maintaining the patient's shared health summary and PCEHR," it said.

It believed that unless this occurred, there was a risk that providers would refuse to participate in the process.

The college also expressed concern about the complexity of access controls, saying that patients will require education to understand the controls, or they won't use them.

Again lots more here:

http://www.zdnet.com.au/gps-need-funding-for-e-health-data-quality-339316432.htm

Third we have some Departmental comment:

PCEHR draft operations out in August

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • June 09, 2011 11:39AM

A REVAMPED version of the draft concept of operations for the $500 million personally controlled e-health record will be issued in August, after the federal Health department was swamped by late submissions.

A total 144 submissions have been received following an extension of the deadline by one week to June 7. Only 11 submissions had been received by the original deadline.

A Health spokeswoman told The Australian more than 40 per cent of the responses came from consumers.

"The National e-Health Transition Authority and the department will review the submissions, and all input will be considered as part of updating the ConOps, which will be released in August," she said.

"The department will also publish submissions (where consent has been provided) on the yourhealth.gov.au website, and ensure this information feeds into change management and benefits realisation work streams."

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/pcehr-draft-operations-out-in-august/story-fn4htb9o-1226072282894

Increasingly the submissions are appearing on the web-sites of the organisations and a search for PCEHR and Submission will find a great deal of reading - limit the search to the last week or so and it works well!

Browsing through it seems most of the issues raised on the blog are raised by a few others - with all sorts of additional ideas coming forward as people assess the ConOps from their perspective and interests.

As I said a day or so ago - the test will be to see just how well this information is digested and turned into a proposal that might actually be useful and viable!

David.