Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, May 09, 2012

There Were A Few Wrinkles In The Detail of the Budget That Are Worth Pointing Out.

First it is useful to have a look at the Medical Observer summary.

Budget key points - Budget targets PIP for e-health, immunisation

9th May 2012
Below are the main points affecting general practice from last night's federal budget papers, see today's regular e-news for more.

2012-13 FEDERAL HEALTH BUDGET KEY POINTS

e-Health
National e-Health Program – continuation: $233.7m SPEND
The Government will provide $233.7 million over three years to implement the National e-Health Program including the rollout of the PCEHR.
Allocation will also provide money for:
  • NeHTA to further develop national standards and operate national infrastructure services;
  • the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner to provide regulatory oversight of the national e-Health services; and
  • the Department of Human Services and the Department of Veterans' Affairs to provide support services to PCEHR participants.
Other e-Health measures:
Telehealth incentive payments to be cut from July 2013: $183.9m SAVING
National Health Information Network (HealthConnect program): $73.6m SAVING
Workforce & Primary Care
Practice Incentives Program (PIP) - more effective targeting: $83.5 SAVING
The Government will improve the efficiency of the Practice Incentives Program (PIP) by more effectively targeting incentives to medical practitioners.
The Government will:
  • include a requirement for general practices to participate in the PCEHR system to receive the e-Health PIP incentive;
Lots more details of other changes are found here:
Crucial to a better understanding of what is going on is the document covering Outcome 10 in the Health Budget.
This can be downloaded from here:
To be clear here is what they think they are doing:

Program 10.2: e-Health implementation

Program Objectives

Provide national eHealth leadership
The adoption of eHealth will improve the quality, safety, efficiency and coordination of health care by reducing the fragmentation of information across the health care sector. The Australian Government will lead the rollout of eHealth technology and services nationally by partnering with the state and territory governments to fund the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA). NEHTA will continue to develop the foundational infrastructure and standards necessary for eHealth, including clinically safe, secure and interoperable eHealth specifications for adoption by public and private health care providers.
Develop systems to support a national eHealth system
The introduction of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system in 2012-13 represents a key milestone in the Government’s strategy to increase Australians’ access to eHealth services. The PCEHR system will enable individuals to register for their record either online, by phone or via selected Medicare shops, and once created the individual will control access. The system will create a better and more efficient health care experience for participating consumers, with a smoother transition of information between care settings, a reduction in the time spent reiterating clinical history or waiting for test results to be located, and a reduction in adverse medical events. Consumers will be able to track their health progress, medications and allergies, while health care providers will have more up-to-date information at the point of care for better clinical decision making. Building on existing capacity and capability and expanding on the geographic footprints of the lead sites will enable a steady and incremental approach to ensure privacy, clinical safety and quality, and ensure that the tangible benefits of the PCEHR system can be monitored, evaluated and reported.
A national eHealth system will be reinforced by the operation and promotion of the Healthcare Identifiers (HI) service. These unique reference numbers give individuals and providers confidence that health information accessed through eHealth technologies is linked with the correct individual at the point of care.
Similarly, the National Authentication Service for Health will issue digital certificates to providers, ensuring that access to sensitive health information is secure. The Department will fund the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner to oversee eHealth legislation, provide consumers and health care providers with information and guidance, and initiate and conciliate complaints.
Provide eHealth services
In 2012-13, the Department will commence delivery of the Telehealth Pilot Program, which uses the National Broadband Network to give patients access to primary health care and specialist consultations from their own homes. The focus of the program will be on aged care, cancer care and palliative care.
----- End Extract
Note the subtle change in governance and note the emphasis on a steady incremental approach. It seems NASH is yet to start as it is talked about in the future tense.
An astonishingly different picture emerges here from the figures on the split of funding. The figures  that follow that shows just how the spending has slowed.
2011-12 Estimated Final $372,856 M(illion)
2012-13 Budget $82,102M
2012-14 Budget $117,464
and then in the years that are not funded $15,102M and $14,884M.
It is also important to go here to look at what is proposed for the PIP program:
Here is how the changes are described:
“In 2012-13, the Australian Government will introduce new eligibility requirements for the Practice Incentives Program (PIP) eHealth Incentive to encourage general practices to keep up-to-date with the latest developments in eHealth and to promote uptake of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
The new requirements will encourage general practices to safely and securely share accurate electronic patient records to enhance the quality of care provided to patients and undertake activities such as electronic prescribing and use of the PCEHR system.
The Department will continue to consult closely with the National eHealth Transition Authority, the PIP Advisory Group, medical software developers and Medicare Australia in the development of the new requirements and to ensure that the appropriate software is available to practices with sufficient lead time to prepare for implementation. In 2012-13, the Australian Government will introduce new eligibility requirements.”
---- End Extract
The detail will clearly come out in due course. Already I am seeing some pushback from the RACGP and AMA.
What is also interesting is this table:
If you look at e-Health what you see is that in fact e-Health spending taken over the forward estimates has been dropped by $20M or so - by cutting telehealth and the National Health Information Network (I thought that died years ago - it was called Healthconnect!)
In summary I see in all this a lot of funds movement and a real cut in the total investments being made - especially in the next 12 months.
No one can imagine that the PCEHR is finished, that it is ready to switch on and that all the feeder systems are up and working. There are a lot of moving parts and it is hard to know what is actually funded and what are just pipedreams at this point. Clearly some operational funding is now with Medicare and so on.
I would love to know 2 things if anyone knows.
1. What the roughly $20M p.a. on the National Health Information Network was and what has this been doing over the last few years?
2. What this is about?
$35.0 million - Regional Queensland eHealth project;
See:
There is a lot more reaction coming - but I think those who seem to think the budget is wonderful news for the PCEHR and NEHTA are smoking something very potent and mood elevating!
At least one other commentator sees things similarly:

E-Health, PCEHR, Nehta: Losers in Australia’s Budget

Posted on
What all those talking of funding boosts and so on are forgetting is that these funds are much less than in the previous two years and that there was essentially no-ongoing funding - so just how can this be a boost?
David.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

Here Is The Ministerial Statement on The E-Health Area. Useful For Information And Some Really Nonsense Claims.

The following announcement is part of the Budget Papers.

Budget Delivers Certainty for eHealth System

Australian families will benefit from a $233.7 million investment to continue the rollout of a national, secure eHealth system which will deliver safer and better health services.
8 May 2012
Australian families will benefit from a $233.7 million investment to continue the rollout of a national, secure eHealth system which will deliver safer and better health services.
From 1 July 2012, interested Australians will be able to register to create a personal eHealth record, which will help ensure they can receive the care they need, where and when they need it.
Protecting living standards of Australian families has been a key priority of the Gillard Government from day one, and this important measure reflects that commitment.
“eHealth will deliver practical benefits to Australian families by reducing medication errors and allowing parents to keep better track of their children’s immunisation records,” Health Minister Tanya Plibersek said.
“It will be much easier for Australians with complex and chronic health conditions to ensure that all their health practitioners are able to access their medical history, making diagnosis quicker and more accurate.”
“We have made good progress in the past two years in the development of Australia’s eHealth system. This Budget provides certainty as we move from its development to its operation.”
eHealth spending in the 2012-13 Budget comprises –
  • $161.6 million to operate the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system for the next two years, including registration and customer support, adoption support and benefits monitoring and evaluation;
  • $4.6 million to maintain safeguards for privacy-related aspects of the PCHER system. This will mean that people can be confident that the privacy of their personal health information is fully protected; and 
  • $67.4 million as the Commonwealth’s share of joint funding with the states and territories for the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) work program for the next two years. This is to operate and maintain critical services and standards for the secure electronic exchange of health information, including healthcare identifiers, authentication services and eHealth standards.
“This Budget builds on the Government’s commitment of $466.7 million over two years to 30 June 2012 to build the national infrastructure for the PCEHR system, moving the nation’s paper-based health system into the digital age,” Minister Plibersek said.
“The rollout of the national eHealth system will be gradual and carefully managed – this is the sensible and prudent way to implement such a large and transformational infrastructure project,” Ms Plibersek said.
eHealth will support a better healthcare experience for patients and improved support and decision-making for healthcare providers. It has been estimated that net benefits from the current PCEHR program will reach $11.5 billion over 15 years to 2025.
Privacy is a fundamental element of the PCEHR system. The Budget funds the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner to have a privacy compliance and oversight role, handling privacy issues and complaints.
“Consumer confidence and trust in the appropriate handling of personal health information is at the heart of the project,” Minister Plibersek said.
The release is found here:
What needs to be noted here is:
1. We are seeing $80M p.a. rather than $230M p.a. being spent -this is a 60+ per cent cut.
2. NEHTA’s funding is now about $35M p.a. from the Commonwealth. That means NEHTA has been cut to a core funding of $70M p.a. down from a lot more over the last few years (95 and 120M or so)
3. A new spend on Privacy and Security.
No one needs to be under any illusion - the days of extravagant NEHRS spending are over until real benefits flow.
Just exactly what is this study that shows the benefits of $11.5B over 15 years? Has anyone seen it and just on what basis are the claims made?
Sounds like a load of rubbish to me and really a grossly deceptive claim. Why do pollies keep speaking unproven and vague rubbish like this?
David.

Well Now We Know. E-Health Has been Cut To Ribbons! Just As Expected. This Will Really Take a Decade If It Ever Happens.

Here is what the Budget has on e-Health.

National e‑Health Program — continuation

Expense ($m)
Department of Health and Ageing    ( 2011‑12) 33.4   (2012‑13 )  58.7 (2013‑14) 90.3  
Department of Human Services -  ( 2012‑13)  15.2  (2013‑14)   28.2
Department of Veterans' Affairs -  (2012‑13)  1.5   (2013‑14)   1.1  
Total - Expense (2011-12) 33.4  (2012‑13)  75.5  (2013‑14)  119.6
So the overall spending is.
2011-12 $33.4M
2012-13 $75.5M
2013-14 $119.6M
The Government will provide $233.7 million over three years to implement the National e‑Health Program.
This funding will ensure that from 1 July 2012, Australians will have the option of registering for a Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) to support more informed clinical assessments and decision‑making, improve continuity of care and introduce efficiencies in health care service delivery. Patients who choose to participate will be able to securely access, and permit their health care providers to access, their health information.
This measure builds on the Government's previous e‑Health investments and includes funding to enable:
  • the National E‑Health Transition Authority to further develop national standards and operate national infrastructure services;
  • the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner to provide regulatory oversight of the national e‑Health services; and
  • the Department of Human Services and the Department of Veterans' Affairs to provide support services to PCEHR participants.
To fully realise the significant benefits of this Commonwealth investment, State and Territory governments will need to continue to invest in core health information systems.
----- End Extract
It is pretty clear what this means and merely confirms what we have all know. The new Federal Minister has decided to take things a lot more slowly in an attempt to actually deliver over a much longer time.
I think this is very sensible - but it needs to come with a re-worked e-Health Strategy and much improved leadership and governance.
Will be fascinating to see how these funds are actually spent.
As you see what is happening each year is that the Department is getting more for operations and development costs are really dramatically cut back.
The first 2 years of the program was $467.00M and now we see investment of a great deal less. We now see 1/2 that amount over 3 years with a dramatic slowdown next financial year.
Essentially we are seeing a dramatic slowdown and sadly only a 2 year commitment of any funding. Pity about the out years
----- Rant On.
I have to say I am gobsmacked that we are also apparently having a $3.6 Billion package of handouts to those on under $80,000 per annum which is entitled “Benefits of the Boom”.  I thought we were trying to build a reasonable surplus - not buy votes from “Working Australians” Just why is it that the rest of the population is not to see these benefits in equal measure?
This really is wealth re-distribution on a scale we have not seen for quite a while. As Charlie Aitken remarked on Twitter - buy gambling and wagering stocks! Just rubbish policy in my view.
We have an economy that is firing on just one cylinder (mining) and we need to be investing and growing other sectors before the boom just passes - as all booms inevitably do. Not just spending the money for political advantage.
----- Rant Off.
Anyway the e-Health approach seems sensible and reasonable to allow a very major slowdown and to work out how to actually make it work. Now if we could sort out the leadership and governance of the program.....
David.

Sky News Is Reporting $250M For E-Health

Very Interesting.

The key issue will be over what period. If over 4 years as is usual we will all know what is happening.

The only way this will be good news if it is that amount per annum.

If the funding is over 2 years it is a major windback.

If the funding is over 4 years it is essentially cancelling the NEHRS in the foreseeable future.

We will know in a couple of hours. 

David.

I Wonder Is It An Accident That E-Health Is Not Mentioned But Tele-health Is In An Immediately Pre-Budget Article From The Health Minister ?

A little pre-Budget hint I wonder?

No more talking, we are ‘doing’ for rural health

8th May 2012
WHEN it comes to improving rural health services, it’s time for practical solutions.
The challenges are well known: shortages of health workers, older hospitals and health facilities and long distances to specialist centres, all have to be addressed so that rural Australians can get the health care they need, when and where they need it. 
We have to think smarter and work harder with an obvious starting point being how to increase the numbers of doctors, nurses and allied health professionals in the bush. 
One of the ways that we are making it more attractive for doctors to work in rural Australia is through significant bonus payments for doctors who choose to work in the most remote locations and retention payments to encourage others to stay in these areas. 
.....
Our investments in telehealth, where a patient consults a doctor or other health professional by video conferencing, is helping to remove the tyranny of distance. 
Imagine a cancer patient in Mandurah, Western Australia, speaking with her oncologist in Perth. She will be able to remain in the comfort of her own home with family and carers, while her specialist collects real time vital statistics such as blood pressure or heart rate. 
.....
The full (much longer) article is here:
All I can say is we may have to assume from this that the NEHRS is not going to feature in any large way. A few hours from now all will be clear.
If the fates are kind I hope to be able to get the basics for e-Health out some time this evening. We will see.
David.

Monday, May 07, 2012

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 7th May, 2012.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

There is really only one issue to be faced this week and that is the outcome for e-Health from the budget. It is released Tuesday evening and after that all will be a great deal clearer.
Until this happens we can all just relax and enjoy the nice Autumn weather!

Also while waiting you could do worse than spend a few minutes reading Grahame Grieves useful blog on HL7 - link about 1/2 way down this entry.
-----

Your medical records could be online

By Leanne Hudson First published: April 29th, 2012

Did you know?

The Australian Government is also setting up an electronic prescriptions scheme, aimed at cutting the abuse of prescription painkillers.
Imagine if any medical practitioner could access your healthcare records at the click of a mouse. The emergency department could treat you more quickly, specialists could compare test results instantly and you wouldn't have to remember the last time you had a tetanus shot.
Welcome to the world of eHealth, a program the  Government has invested $466 million in. Its aim is to create PCEHRs (Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records) that centralise a patient's healthcare information and, with their permission, present it to registered healthcare providers.
Advocates of the scheme say it will ensure a safer, more efficient healthcare system, but critics raise issues including privacy, access and consent. "I don't think privacy has been addressed enough," says Professor Julie Zetler, senior lecturer in the department of marketing and management at Macquarie University, who is researching the ethics of eHealth. Zetler also has concerns about security – how do you prevent unauthorised use of the records?
------

Rising cost to fix SA Health problems

By Nick Harmsen
Updated May 02, 2012 08:18:58
The South Australian Health Department will pay consultants $1.7 million to fix major issues with its new information technology system.
Health Minister John Hill has revealed officials were warned of potential problems two years ago.
The minister needed to hire external consultants to help reconcile $90 million of accounts due to major problems introducing a new IT system.
Last month, health officials revealed they had paid about $500,000 to fix the mess, but now the estimated cost is $1.7 million.
-----

Costs of botched payroll to double

  • by: Michael McKenna, Queensland political editor
  • From: The Australian
  • May 02, 2012 12:00AM
THE cost of fixing Queensland Health's botched payroll system is set to spiral into one of Australia's most expensive bureaucratic bungles with the newly elected Liberal National Party government warning of a potential doubling of the estimated $220 million repair bill.
Health Minister Lawrence Springborg yesterday accused the Bligh Labor government of lying about the extent of problems with the $40m payroll system, which left thousands of health workers underpaid, overpaid or unpaid after it was implemented in 2010.
The payroll debacle -- which forced Queensland Health to claw back about $75m in overpayments from its employees last year -- was ranked in internal Labor polling ahead of the March 24 election as one of the top reasons for voters turning against the Bligh government.
-----

GP shop-front part of e-health push

Updated May 04, 2012 07:37:49
Hunter Urban Medicare Local needs to sign-up 20,000 people for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
The organisation representing Hunter GPs is ramping-up preparations for its electronic health system by opening a new shop-front office today in the Hunter Street mall.
Hunter Urban Medicare Local needs to sign-up 20,000 people for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record by the end of next month.
-----

NEWS

April 30, 2012

Bloom fading from e-health golden wattle

It sounded like a great idea in 2010: a personally controlled electronic health record that would allow Australians to access and share medical records in a nationwide database. The system, it was argued, would support better medical decision-making, reduce errors and save time and money.
To that end, the government set aside A$467 million and targeted an ambitious launch date of July 1, 2012.
Medical groups such as the Australian Medical Association lauded the notion, asserting that a shared electronic health record would help doctors deliver better care as they’d have access to a patient’s full clinical records no matter where he was treated. Health and consumer advocates were equally effusive. The proposed system would yield improved health outcomes, reduce medical mistakes and provide confidential health records.
-----

‘We’ve been clear’: Dept rejects PCEHR criticism

1st May 2012
THE health department has rejected suggestions it has been anything but “clear and unequivocal” about funding arrangements for GPs compiling PCEHR records, as doctors’ groups continue to question the details.
AMA president Dr Steve Hambleton has accused the department of using “weasel words” to obscure the fact there is no new funding for GPs to prepare e-health records.
The RACGP last week released a series of scenarios, developed with support from the department, to give GPs examples of how the PCEHR would work with existing MBS items.
-----

E-health, Myki the big Vic budget winners

By Josh Taylor, ZDNet.com.au on May 2nd, 2012
As the Victorian Government looks to cut spending and produce a surplus, the majority of tech funding in the Victorian Budget, released yesterday, targets e-health investments and the state's troubled transport smart card Myki.
Victorian Premier Ted Ballieu said yesterday that the Budget "delivers the right economic strategy to put Victoria's finances onto a stronger foundation for the future, while managing the tight financial constraints imposed by international economic uncertainty, a weaker national economy and consequent declines in state revenue".
The government has allocated $100 million over the next four financial years to the Victorian Innovation, E-Health and Communications Technology Fund. This will support health IT projects, including system and software upgrades and installations, according to budget documents. The Coalition-led government has also dedicated $8.3 million per annum in funding over the next two years as part of the state's contribution to National E-Health Transition Authority's (NEHTA) core operations.
-----

Australian Healthcare Product Purchasers Intention Statement NPC and eProcurement Edition 1

On behalf of the NEHTA Supply Chain Reference Group, we would like to announce the release of the Australian Healthcare Product Purchasers Intention Statement NPC and eProcurement Edition 1 PDF (395.71 kB)
As a part of NEHTA’s Supply Chain Reform Programme Review conducted in 2011, suppliers indicated that they were unclear as to how their product data loaded on the National Product Catalogue (NPC) was being used by Australian Healthcare Buyers. Accordingly, the purpose of this Intention Statement is to provide pharmaceutical, medical product and consumable suppliers, manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, etc. in the Australian healthcare market with a snapshot of current NPC and eProcurement activities in the public and some private healthcare provider market.
-----

Medicare Locals' performance to be compared, not GPs: NHPA

2nd May 2012
THE National Health Performance Authority (NHPA) has reassured GPs their individual work will not be tested when the organisation begins the task of assessing the effectiveness of Medicare Locals.
The new body hopes to use a set of 50 indicators endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) to publish comparison data of hospitals across the country. About 30 of these would be used as a “departure point” for assessing MLs, NHPA acting CEO Dr Diane Watson said.
Some GPs have raised concerns the practice would amount to a “My School” style league table, which would pit doctors against their peers regarding performance in matters that were often unquantifiable.
-----

Melb students through to Imagine Cup final

By Luke Hopewell, ZDNet.com.au on May 2nd, 2012
Four Victorian students have secured a place in the finals of the Microsoft Imagine Cup to be held in Sydney, thanks to an innovation enabling a "digital stethoscope"
-----

HL7 Progress Report

Posted on May 5, 2012 by Grahame Grieve
This blog post is based on a presentation I made to The Australian Medical Software Industry Association (MSIA) at a recent meeting. The focus of this presentation was a CEO level summary of where HL7 is at, as context for how to understand the use of HL7 standards in Australia. Note that interoperability is a major piece of the landscape here in Australia, and most CEOs are somewhat (through to intimately) involved in it, and therefore at least familiar with the innards of a v2 message.
Use of HL7 in Australia
HL7 v2 was first used for exchanging patient management information in single-campus hospitals. Over the last 20 years, the use of HL7 v2 has grown from that to be used for diagnostic reports in hospitals and then between clinical providers, and also referrals and discharge summaries within and between providers. There is also some use for pharmacy messaging, though I am only aware of this internally to an institution.This use has been aided and fostered by a series of Australian standards known by AS 4700.x where x indicates the intended use of the standard.
-----

Study Confirms e-Prescribing Systems Reduce Medication Errors

A recent study in Australia confirmed what many U.S. health organizations and officials promote: e-prescribing systems help to reduce a variety of medication errors.
April 28, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ -- A recent study in Australia confirmed what many U.S. health organizations and officials promote: e-prescribing systems help to reduce a variety of medication errors. While many healthcare hospitals and clinics in the U.S. have already implemented e-prescribing and other online medical systems and processes, the government and organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA) continue to encourage their adoption. Widespread use of e-prescribing systems helps protect patients and avoid painful and costly medication errors.
e-Prescribing Method
Electronic prescribing, or e-prescribing, systems help to automate the process of ordering, dispensing and paying for prescription drugs. Typically a physician enters a script in a patient's record on the e-prescribing system, which is then forwarded to a pharmacy of the patient's choice. The prescription history, insurance coverage and any possible medication interactions or side effects for a patient are also tracked within the e-prescribing system. In addition, refills and other authorizations are managed through the e-prescribing interface.
-----

Errors rife on GP scripts

3 May, 2012 Jo Hartley
One in 20 prescription items on GP scripts contain an error or inadequate instructions on monitoring the drug, a study commissioned by the UK general practice professional regulator has revealed.
Most of the errors were categorised as oversights rather than mistakes, such as the GP failing to write down how often a patient should take the medication or the prescription of an incorrect dose.
However around one in every 550 prescription items was judged to contain a serious error, which included prescribing penicillin to a patient with a known allergy to the drug, and failing to ensure a patient on warfarin was being regularly monitored.
-----

Vision of future: experts close to turning bionic eye dream into reality

May 2, 2012
FIFTEEN years ago, the bid to create Australia's first bionic eye relied on university researchers pillaging old stereos for parts.
However today, 154 researchers led by biomedical engineers from the University of NSW could be less than a year away from their goal of saving the vision of degenerative eye disease sufferers.
In 1997, when the work began, Gregg Suaning and Nigel Lovell were unfunded, but dogged, researchers ripping old stereos asunder for spare parts in their attempts to build a bionic eye.
-----

Pioneering electronic eye trials a success

4th May 2012
THE first UK clinical trials of an electronic eye implant designed to restore the sight of blind people have proved successful and "exceeded expectations", scientists say.
Eye experts developing the pioneering new technology said the first group of British patients to receive the electronic microchips were regaining "useful vision" just weeks after undergoing surgery.
The news will offer fresh hope for people with retinitis pigmentosa, they said.
Retina Implant AG, a leading developer of subretinal implants, fitted two patients with retinitis pigmentosa with the wireless device in mid-April as part of its UK trial.
-----

Consumers win more power over credit data

Geesche Jacobsen
May 2, 2012
THE Australian Privacy Commissioner is to get greater powers to investigate and resolve complaints about privacy breaches, the federal Attorney-General, Nicola Roxon, has announced.
Consumers will also have a greater ability to see information held about them by credit reporting agencies, and to have it corrected, a spokesman for Ms Roxon said.
The changes - to be introduced to Parliament in the winter session - are the government's response to a Senate committee review of proposed national privacy principles, which were developed in response to a 2008 report by the Australian Law Reform Commission.
-----

Mobile phone radiation emissions may be cut

  • by: NATASHA BITA, CONSUMER EDITOR
  • From: The Australian
  • May 05, 2012 12:00AM
AUSTRALIA'S radiation limits for mobile phones and transmitters may be changed for the first time in a decade, after a string of European countries lowered their limits.
The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency is setting up a panel of experts to aid its review of scientific literature published since 2002.
"Should evidence arise to indicate that the exposure limits do not provide adequate protection, then the standard will be revised," ARPANSA said yesterday.
-----

The password dilemma

Matt Smith
April 30, 2012 - 12:18PM
Think about all the accounts you have online that require a password: email, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, a multitude of forums, a handful of bank accounts.
Now think about how many of these accounts use the same, easy to remember password. The name of a relative, a footy team, or a cherished pet? Or did you make the worst mistake, and set your password as '123456', 'abc123', 'qwerty', or even the dreaded (but strangely common) 'password'?
You aren't alone with these mistakes, chances are that if your password is easy for you to remember, it's easy for a hacker to figure out.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 120 – Results – 7th May, 2012.

The question was:
Do You Believe The Overall Design Approach Adopted For The NEHRS Was Optimal Given Experience Here and Overseas?
It Was Perfect
-  4 (9%)
It Needed A Bit More Thought
-  6 (13%)
It Had Some Major Design Flaws
-  6 (13%)
It Was Just Ill Conceived And Wrong
-  28 (63%)
Votes : 44
This looks pretty clear to me - over 70% reckon it has major flaws or worse.
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.

Sunday, May 06, 2012

Budget Speculation Is Now Rife - What Do We Know About Health and E-Health?

The following appeared today.

Budget drills deep to shorten dental queues

May 6, 2012
An injection of more than $500 million into the dental system to provide treatment for 400,000 people on the waiting list will be one of the main measures in Tuesday's budget.
And Prime Minister Julia Gillard will announce today that parents will receive up to $820 for every child at high school and $410 for each child in primary school to help with education costs under a new means-tested bonus in the budget.
Ms Gillard has decided to axe the education tax rebate and replace it with direct cash payments, after more than 600,000 eligible families failed to claim $400 million in rebates in 2010/11.
In line with many of the government's other budget plans, $290 million has been offset from other health programs for the dental scheme, leaving $225 million as new money to be spent over the next four years.
This shows the lengths to which the government has gone to fund initiatives while taking the budget from a $40 billion deficit to a $1.5 billion surplus.
The Minister for Health, Tanya Plibersek, said the package delivered hope to those ''who have waited too long on public dental lists. It will lay the foundation for a new way of providing dental services that will ensure those most in need will get care when and where they need it.''
The core of the announcement is $345.9 million for dental services for the 400,000 people - most of them concession card holders - who are waiting for care in the public system.
More details here:
This announcement follows the announcement a few weeks ago (before Slipper and Thomson got really out of hand) of a large aged care package:

More Choice, Easier Access and Better Care for Older Australians

Under landmark changes to the aged care system, more people will get to keep their home, and more people will get to stay in their home as they receive aged care.
Under landmark changes to the aged care system, more people will get to keep their home, and more people will get to stay in their home as they receive aged care.

Joint Release

The Hon Julia Gillard MP
Prime Minister of Australia

The Hon Mark Butler MP
Minister for Social Inclusion,
Minister for Mental Health and Ageing

20 April 2012
Under landmark changes to the aged care system, more people will get to keep their home, and more people will get to stay in their home as they receive aged care.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard and the Minister for Ageing, Mark Butler, today announced a 10-year plan to reshape aged care, beginning 1 July 2012.
The Gillard Labor Government will deliver the $3.7 billion Living Longer Living Better plan to deliver more choice, easier access and better care for older Australians and their families.
To make it easier for older Australians to stay in their home while they receive care, we will:
  • Increase the number of Home Care Packages- from 59,876 to almost 100,000 (99,669).
  • Provide tailored care packages to people receiving home care, and new funding for dementia care.
  • Cap costs, so that full pensioners pay no more than the basic fee.
Vastly more detail is found here
And just yesterday we had this:

Bowel cancer program to get budget boost

Posted May 05, 2012 08:08:47
The Federal Government is announcing extra funding for bowel cancer screening as part of next week's budget.
At the moment screenings are only provided free to people aged 50, 55 and 65.
The Government is spending $50 million to extend the National Screening Program so that people aged between 50 and 70 will be offered free tests every five years.
More here:
There are also a lot of little electorate specifics - a scanner here, a clinic there and so on! So a lot of good news is out there. And clearly it adds up to a fair bit - with what looks like at least $300M of new money + all those little bibs and bobs.
Of course we also have the usual round of budget requests - such as the one below.

Rural Doctors Association of Australia

-----

7. MBS Items Claimable For Creating A Health Summary For PCEHRs

RDAA urges the Government to include funding in the Federal Budget for 2012-2013 for a MBS item claimable for creating a health summary for a Patient Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
RDAA supports the introduction of the PCEHR as a means of addressing the current fragmentation of medical information spread across a number of different locations and systems. This is particularly relevant for rural consumers, who are often forced to travel to access specialist and/or general health services, and who are most likely to be transferred away from their local community in the event of a medical emergency or serious illness.
RDAA has a number of concerns about the likely uptake of the PCEHR system in rural and remote areas, as rural doctors and rural practices will face additional challenges in supporting the introduction of PCEHRs. Rural doctors working in rural areas tend to work longer hours than their counterparts in urban areas and struggle to remain economically viable. In view of this, many rural doctors may also be reluctant to participate in the PCEHR system in the absence of appropriate compensation for the
time they will spend informing patients about the PCEHR system and creating health summaries for patients who wish to “opt-in” to the system.
In the absence of an MBS item, many rural doctors will elect not to participate in the PCEHR system.
----- End Extract.
The full submission is here:
So where are we left for e-Health. As is obvious what gets pre-announced is good news and the bad news is held to Budget Night.
In the crazy environment where a budget surplus is being treated as vital necessity - and as one wit so amusingly put it ‘they are looking in behind the sofa for lost coins’ - we have to assume if there was good news it would be out by now.
On that basis I don’t hold much hope at all. I think what we are going to see is some continuation funding at a much lower level than the past two years with funds announced for the whole forward estimates period at a continuing and much lower levels.
Time (2 days) will tell.
David.