Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, August 09, 2012

It Seems NEHTA Finds It Helpful To Pay People To Turn Up and Listen To Them. They Must Have A Great Message Or Is It Something Else?

The following appeared today.

E-health bureaucrats spend $5m on travel

THEY'VE produced an e-health record that so far can't be used by doctors, but the bureaucrats in charge last year spent more than $5 million on travel and on stakeholders in five-star hotels.
The National e-Health Transition Authority, with 257 employees, told a Senate estimates committee it spent $4.3m on travel in 2011-12 and more than $1m on events, conferences and dinners in five-star hotels.
Liberal National Party senator Sue Boyce said that after five years and hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayers' money, all NEHTA had managed to deliver was a toll-free number.
"It's clearly time for an independent review of the performance and expenditure of NEHTA," she said.
Opposition primary healthcare spokesman Andrew Southcott said despite a budget of $218m over three years, NEHTA had still to deliver an e-health record that could be used by patients and doctors.
The revelation comes after NEHTA pulled out of a roadshow for Australian surgeons in Kuala Lumpur after inquiries by The Australian.
Earlier this year, NEHTA told the Senate it had spent $37,000 on entertainment between July last year and February.
This week, the agency revealed that amount did not include more than $1m it spent on stakeholder engagement events, conferences and dinners. One event at Sydney's InterContinental Hotel in April was attended by about 100 people who were offered steak and seafood, creme brulee or a chocolate dessert, and wine.
Read more about the extravagances and excess here:
For even more interesting information you can go direct to the source of the story found here:
These are NEHTA’s responses to Questions on Notice following the Budget Senate Estimates hearings a month or so back.
There are about 51 questions and most are just ducked and or rather arrogantly ignored.
Question 49 is just a ripper!
Senate Community Affairs Committee

ANSWERS TO ESTIMATES QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

National e-Health Transition Authority (NeHTA)
Budget Estimates 2012-13
Question: 49
OUTCOME 10.2: e-Health
Topic: Practitioner training for the PCEHR
Senator Boyce asked:
During Estimates Mr Peter Fleming was asked a very specific question and I quote; “How many Practitioners will be trained to use the PCEHR as of June 30 2012?”
The question wasn’t answered, it’s a number between 0 and 10,000, could you tell me the exact number please?
Answer:
3,629.
If that is true - there are pigs flying past my study as I type. Given not a single practitioner has software to connect to the PCEHR as yet what does this answer mean? And how would such an exact number have been determined?
We won’t even discuss that it seems the blogger (Question 1) who opposes what I do seeking openness and transparency in Australian e-Health, and doing it for nothing, is being paid by NEHTA on a ‘commercial in confidence’ basis. I wonder is the public getting value for money for these funds?
It seems to me NEHTA treating the Senate the way they are is likely to lead to some very sudden vacancies there should the next Federal Election turn out as presently seems almost inevitable. Pretty gutsy behaviour I reckon.
David.

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

The NEHRS Audit Trail Is A Bit Of A Joke - Heavens It Is Very Unfriendly and Confusing For Users!

I popped along to the NEHRS System and grabbed a subset of the Audit Trail I was provided with covering a few of my visits
Here we have a header which explains what we are seeing.
Approval Date/Time - Operation Performed - Organisation Name - Role- Access Condition- Action Type- Subject -Type Subject
And here is the content.
05/08/2012 09:09:05 AMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
05/08/2012 09:08:55 AMgetDocumentIndividualReadDocumentID2.25.187229862248151894270572118199095601993
05/08/2012 09:08:38 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
05/08/2012 09:08:31 AMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
29/07/2012 09:08:46 AMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
29/07/2012 09:08:28 AMgetDocumentIndividualReadDocumentID2.25.187229862248151894270572118199095601993
29/07/2012 09:08:21 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
29/07/2012 09:08:12 AMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
26/07/2012 03:16:29 PMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
26/07/2012 03:16:05 PMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
26/07/2012 03:15:56 PMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
24/07/2012 11:44:49 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
24/07/2012 11:44:49 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
24/07/2012 11:44:30 AMManageConsentCONSUMERReadPCEHRCONSENT
24/07/2012 11:44:01 AMgetDocumentIndividualReadDocumentID2.25.187229862248151894270572118199095601993
24/07/2012 11:42:57 AMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
24/07/2012 11:42:38 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
24/07/2012 11:42:29 AMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
22/07/2012 09:27:30 AMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
22/07/2012 09:27:13 AMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
22/07/2012 09:27:04 AMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
20/07/2012 07:08:44 PMgetConsolidatedViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
20/07/2012 07:08:28 PMgetDocumentListIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
20/07/2012 07:08:19 PMgetIndividualDetailsViewIndividualReadIHIxxxxx01181142493
18/07/2012 02:07:47 PMgetDocumentIndividualReadDocumentID2.25.187229862248151894270572118199095601993
----- End Extract.
As you can see it is not all that clear or user friendly. But I was not expecting the surprise I received as I looked closely.
What interested me were these three entries with these associated times:
1. 26/07/2012 03:15:56
2. 20/07/2012 07:08:44
3. 18/07/2012 02:07:47
At all these 3 dates and times it seemed to me I was either tucked up in my bed of having my shower before coming down to my study. The other times seemed about right suggesting the time-zone being reported is correct.
It was only after careful review and a few more visits did I notice the PM on the next line of the report. Now the entries made sense!
Why a 24 hour clock representation like say this below was not used is hard to understand.
Surely things should have looked like:
1. 26/07/2012 15:15:56
2. 20/07/2012 19:08:44
3. 18/07/2012 14:07:47
I really wonder just what is going on here and why a usability assessment has not been done
The rest of the information provided is even more incomprehensible as you can see for yourself.
Of course just what any, not all that technically literate, consumer would make of all this - and what they might think it means is anyone’s guess. Some of the target demographics like senior citizens and children may not be all that well equipped to know what they are seeing at all.
At the very least there should be a consumer friendly explanation of what is being displayed and what is all means!
This really is the Audit Trail you have when you don’t have an Audit Trail!
For my part I think I might contact the NEHRS System Operator - and ask what is going on to make all this more useful - after I have seen what comments or suggestions others have.  To me this is really very half baked.
David.
PS. It is apparently naughty to display your IHI. Not sure why. So changed a few characters!
D.

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

More Spin Than A Texas Twister. That Is What NEHTA and DoHA Are Giving Us It Would Seem.

This appeared earlier today.

Authority fails to 'deliver' on e-health system

THE National E-Health Transition Authority has redefined "delivery" in relation to technical specifications released to the software industry, whereby "delivered does not mean complete".
A NEHTA Specification Dashboard provided on March 14 to the ICT Implement Group managing the introduction of the personally controlled e-health record system included an unusual disclaimer.
"'Delivery' does not mean complete in the sense of all components of the specification bundle. NEHTA has provided partial releases of the 'specification bundles' in some situations to support market access to specifications as soon as possible. For example, some Conformance Profiles are yet to be published. Otherwise, components required for software vendors to commence work on NEHTA Specifications are present," it says.
The ICT-IG comprises senior representatives of the Health Department, NEHTA, Medicare and three industry bodies -- the Medical Software Industry Association, the Australian Information Industry Association and the Aged Care IT Vendor Association.
The Australian understands the confidential document, prepared by NEHTA's head of PCEHR architecture on February 2, was provided to the industry representatives at the meeting, but they were not permitted to share it with their members.
Macquarie Dictionary defines "deliver" as: to give forth or produce; to make a delivery of services; to perform a task competently and professionally; come up to expectations.
A Health Department spokeswoman said the dashboard document tabled was provided "as a draft to that meeting to test the appropriateness of the content and presentation for material intended to be shared with the members of the industry associations".
"There were some refinements to this document as a result of the discussion, and the specifications dashboard has since been published," she said.
"The term 'delivered' and the accompanying reference to 'complete' was an acknowledgment that more supporting materials would continue to be delivered.
"The technical specifications have been and remain complete, and materials such as conformance profiles, the Conformance, Compliance and Accreditation tests and test cases continued to be refined with industry representatives at the time the document was discussed in March."
According to the dashboard document, the only PCEHR specification bundles fully available for use were the advanced care directive; the B2B gateway including repository services and conformant repositories; template services and the PCEHR common specifications.
The eDischarge summary, eReferral, event summary, shared health summary and specialist letter each had a specification "delivered", but the implementation guidelines had all been withdrawn pending revision.
The Electronic Medications Management specification was "delivered" by virtue of being a spec produced in 2010; this was withdrawn by NEHTA on February 28, pending development of a revised specification and was available "for information only".
A version of the PCEHR Architecture specification was "delivered" in November 2011, but a revised version is currently in production.
An existing specification for secure messaging was "delivered", but is not currently usable due to a lack of infrastructure, yet to be provided by NEHTA.
The PCEHR consolidated view January forecast for delivery was not met. The core security policy, December 2011 forecast for delivery was not met. The conformant consumer portal January forecast for delivery was not met.
And the National Authentication Service for Health February forecast for delivery was not met and a new time line is still under negotiation.
More spin, if you can stomach it, is to be found in the rest of the article here:
What is really amazing is that all these ‘deliveries’ have not actually been subjected to the real test of having been implemented and used for a period to see whether they actually work or not.
One can only marvel at the way success can be carefully plucked from delay and under performance.
I am sure that we would wind up doing much better with our efforts and make much better use of the funds involved if we had a great deal more openness and focussed the NEHTA media unit of the facts, not the spin.
As always it is the governance and leadership approach that is adopted that is a key determinant of project success or failure with things like the NEHRS. Sadly that is still lacking in my view.
David.

Monday, August 06, 2012

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 6th August, 2012.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

All in all another quiet week - the reasons for this will become clear in a month or two as people slowly realise that we are seeing very little progress - and start to speak out and question just what is going on. Right now there is some element of waiting for a little while and giving DoHA and NEHTA the benefit of the doubt. The next set of Senate Estimates hearings should be very interesting.
Also the Australian National Audit Office does seem to have e-Health and Health Reform on its agenda. It would be fascinating if these are undertaken this financial year. They sure are needed!

Potential audits

Progressing National Health Reforms

In August 2011, all Australian governments signed the National Health Reform Agreement. Under this agreement, the Australian Government has committed an extra $16.4 billion until 2019–20 for public hospitals. The National Health Reform Agreement, and the National Health and Hospitals Network Agreement that it supersedes, propose reforms to the financing of the Australian health and hospital system with major changes to the governance arrangements between the Australian Government and the states and territories aimed at delivering better health and hospital services. The changes to the funding arrangements are designed to provide a secure funding base for health and hospital services in the future. The new governance arrangements are intended to improve the responsiveness of the system to local needs, enhance the quality of services, and allow greater transparency. An audit would examine the effectiveness of DoHA’s actions to progress the national health reforms.

National e-Health Implementation

In the 2011−12 Budget, the Australian Government committed $433 million to e-Health, largely as part of ongoing processes to facilitate the transition of paper-based clinical record keeping to electronic means for better information exchange to deliver safer, more efficient, better quality healthcare. Since June 2009, the National e-Health Transition Authority has been responsible for delivering key components of the National e-Health Strategy (a Council of Australian Governments initiative) and, from 2010, had a managing agent role, under the department’s leadership, in relation to the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) for all Australians. DoHA has set a goal to have 0.5 million Australians registered for their own PCEHR before the national launch of e-Health in 2012–13. However, problems encountered in pilot practices, relating to software incompatibility, have threatened the achievement of this goal.
An audit would examine DoHA’s leadership, management and co-ordination of e-Health developments.
----- End Extract.
Page 80 or so on in this document.
-----

Patient ID glitches dog ehealth system

Date July 30, 2012

Mark Metherell

Mark Metherell is health correspondent

GLITCHES in patient identity details for the new ehealth system have been found in about one-third of cases nationally, according to a report the Federal Health Department refuses to release.
The secret report shows patient identity information held by state public hospitals frequently fails to match the data that Medicare holds on the same individuals. Differences in the spelling of names or other variations can pose a significant obstacle, as the system requires an exact match before individuals can get ehealth access.
-----

Health plays down e-health record metrics

The Department of Health and Ageing has played down internal take-up estimates for the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) by Australian consumers as a meaningful metric of the initiative's success.
The opt-in health summary and record has attracted 4500 registrations in the 30 days since its launch on July 1, according to Peter Fleming, chief executive of lead e-health agency NEHTA.
Fleming said the initial figure was based on a system that had not been heavily advertised and was undergoing a "staged rollout" of features and transition from the 12 record pilot sites.
-----

Hard times threaten 200 jobs at IBM Australia

TECHNOLOGY giant IBM Australia has embarked on a restructuring exercise that employees fear will cost about 200 jobs.
IBM is calling it a "redeployment" program and affected staff have been given roughly one month to find another role within the organisation or risk termination.
Sources told The Australian that staff from all levels would be hit by Project Phoenix, IBM's codename for the jobs plan.
.....
In addition, warnings by software vendor SAP, IBM and others to properly test the system were not heeded by Queensland Health because it was considered too great a task.
IBM has yet to deliver the National Authentication Service for Health (NASH), a key part of the personally controlled e-health system, which was soft-launched on July 1.
NASH verifies authorised users and supports secure communications among medical providers.
-----

4000 sign up to Gillard government's e-health record system

AROUND 130 people a day have signed up for the Gillard government's e-health record system since it went live, a senior government official has revealed.
The government hopes to hit 500,000 registrations by June 30 next year.
Department of Health and Ageing secretary Jane Halton said there had been more than 4000 registrations since the personally controlled e-health record system was launched on July 1.
"I haven't seen the figures this morning but interestingly, and without any fanfare at all, there are over 4000 people who have registered for the national PCEHR," Ms Halton said in her keynote address at the 2012 Health Informatics conference in Sydney.
-----

Some PCEHR bugs will be fixed after go-live, says NEHTA

  • by: Fran Foo
  • From: Australian IT
  • August 01, 2012 2:39PM
PEOPLE with hyphens in their names had to wait for days to register for the personally controlled e-health record system, National E-Health Transition Authority chief Peter Fleming confirmed.
Testing and remediation would be done after PCEHR features and functionalities were pushed live for the public to use online, according to Mr Fleming.
"It's one of the reasons why we're slowly pushing this out into the market to have a look, address the problems immediately and that hyphen (issue) was well and truly fixed within days of being identified and made sure that that's appropriate so that's on the hyphen side," Mr Fleming told participants during a panel session yesterday at the 2012 Health Informatics conference in Sydney.
-----

TGA adverse event database goes live

1 August, 2012 Michael Woodhead
The TGA has launched its public searchable database of adverse events, which shows the number and types of adverse event reports it has received for specific drugs.
The online database  allows users to search by the name of the drug, and within a time range dating back to 1971. Advanced search options also allow users to narrow down adverse events searches to broad categories such as cardiac or nervous system disorders.
-----

Darwin shows off e-health initiatives

  • From: AAP
  • July 31, 2012 6:36PM
THE federal government has brought its national broadband network (NBN) sell to Darwin but a planned demonstration of how it will aid doctors didn't go as smoothly as hoped.
"We are having trouble," said Gus Hunter, an ear nose and throat surgeon at Royal Darwin Hospital as he tried to show off a virtual consultation.
"It was working when we tried it yesterday," he added, as he struggled to hear what his patient, about 1000 kilometres away in Nhulunbuy, was saying.
After a few minutes the technology began to work properly, and Dr Hunter successfully got a look inside the patient's ear canal and was able to rule out a middle ear infection or perforated ear drum.
-----

Australia aims to improve NT healthcare with IT

“Telehealth has the potential to save lives,” said Minister Stephen Conroy.
A new government telehealth program aims to “close the healthcare and education gap experienced by remote communities in the Northern Territory,” said Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Minister Stephen Conroy.
The program is jointly funded by the Commonwealth and NT governments and is part of a $20 million digital regions initiative.
The Health eTowns TelehealthNT Network project aims to enhance delivery of health and education services to 47 remote towns and provide teleheatlth services to emergency rooms and resuscitation areas in regional hospitals and 17 territory growth towns, Conroy's office said. The program will “allow doctors based in Darwin to examine, talk to, and diagnose patients in remote areas through the use of high-definition Medicarts and room-based units."
-----

Concern chiros, acupuncturists may create PCEHRs

31 July, 2012 Paul Smith
There are new fears the personally controlled e-health record system will allow any registered health professional to create patients’ shared health summaries — even when they have limited understanding of medications and medical diagnoses.
The legislation underpinning the $467 million PCEHR system states that only doctors, registered nurses and Aboriginal health workers can create and curate the health summaries.
The summaries are a key element of the system and include current diagnoses, medications, adverse reactions and allergies. The expectation is that they will be accessible to the rest of the health system, including treating doctors and EDs.
-----

Health Infrastructure NSW pushes for digital hospitals

Summary: Health Infrastructure NSW is pushing to ensure that major hospitals and facilities are digitally modelled to ensure that they can use future technology.
By Michael Lee | July 31, 2012 -- 03:34 GMT (13:34 AEST)
Health Infrastructure NSW CEO Robert Rust has said that it's time to mandate the use of IT when developing health infrastructure in order to build the healthcare system of the next decade.
Speaking at the Digital Hospital Design conference in Sydney yesterday, Rust said that the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) when building hospitals and other medical facilities will be instrumental in creating better healthcare facilities.
BIM allows hospitals to be built and modelled in a virtual environment, providing stakeholders with better information for decision making. It has been used in the past to model and simulate patient inflow and movement throughout a building, helping designers to optimise the location of building features, such as corridor widths, during the planning phase, rather than dealing with the issue once the facility is built.
-----

Aged care pioneers of the PCEHR

Published on Tue, 31/07/2012, 02:59:18
By Stephen Easton
Three aged care providers became the first healthcare organisations in Australia to see inside the personally-controlled eHealth record (PCEHR), after taking part in a pilot project recently on behalf of the industry.
The major work has now been completed on the Pathfinder project, which began in May and brought together three aged care providers with three aged care software vendors to work through incorporating the PCEHR into aged care services.
A report has been delivered to the Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA) and will soon be made available to the whole aged care industry, to share the findings from the project, which was jointly organised by the Aged Care Industry IT Council (ACIITC), National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) and the Department.
-----

Aus boosts investment in health informatics

The Australian Government is boosting investment in health informatics to deliver integrated patient care nationally.
Healthcare agencies and service delivery providers will increasingly use informatics to collect, analyse, and move data across different jurisdictions, according to Dr Michael Bainbridge, programme clinical lead, National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA).
Dr Bainbridge, also adjunct professor, clinical informatics, University of British Columbia, was speaking at the industry’s peak Health Informatics Conference (HIC 2012) in Sydney.
-----

BYO devices cause security headaches according to a survey

TECHNOLOGY decision-makers have questioned the merits of bring-your-own-device schemes, with a large proportion of survey respondents saying the practice is risky.
Sixty-eight per cent of organisations believe mobile devices and BYO devices increase risk, the 2012 Quest Software identity and access management study finds.
Seven per cent of participants said they did not know if it was detrimental to their business and the rest said mobile and BYO device plans posed no risk.
-----

Aus e-health drives demand for BYOD

Australia’s e-health sector is driving the demand for bring-your-own-devices (BYOD). Increasingly, personally-owned devices will empower citizens to take ownership and make better choices about personal healthcare.
BYOD technology will change the landscape for healthcare in Australia, according to David Roffe, chief information officer at St Vincent’s and Mater Health Sydney (New South Wales).
David Roffe was speaking at the industry’s Health Informatics Conference (HIN 2012) in Sydney, organised by the Health Informatics Society of Australia.
He told delegates that BYOD is helping connect patients, medical practitioners, hospitals and clinics in real-time. “Mobile devices touch every work practice in healthcare, including doctors, nurses and pharmacists.”
-----

Understanding v2 Acknowledgements

Posted on August 2, 2012 by Grahame Grieve
Almost always, when you send an HL7 v2 message, you need or get an acknowledgement message back from the destination system. This post describes how these acknowledgements work.

Scenarios

There’s 2 main uses for acknowledgement messages:
  • You need some content returned from the destination (i.e. accepting an order, getting an answer to a query)
  • You simply need to know that the message was received and processed without error
There’s a few corner cases where you don’t even need acknowledgement – the sender simply doesn’t care whether the receiver gets it or not. In the real world, the only case that I’ve seen for this is a vital signs monitor that sends an observation message with the current vital sign measurements once every minute. It’s assumed that some other system will raise an alert if the messages aren’t getting through. In every other case I’ve seen, there’s some kind of acknowledgement.
-----

Online database for health providers and policy makers

Healthdata™ is a new, online subscription service that enables users to easily download authoritative, evidence-based health sector information, including projections about regional populations, and the services and workforce available in that region.

Planning the delivery of health care services has been changed forever

Recent years has seen exponential growth in the amount of health related data that organisations have access to. However, much of it is not user friendly, is incomplete, or needs to be compiled from many disparate sources. Also, it is often limited to historical collections. Compiling and manipulating the data to assist with health services planning has proven to be time consuming and expensive.
Healthdata™ provides health providers and policy makers with relevant and timely data across more than 50 health conditions, including all of the Australian Government’s eight national health priority areas:
  • Arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions
  • Asthma
  • Cancer control
  • Cardiovascular health
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Injury prevention and control
  • Mental health 
  • Obesity.
-----

Deloitte drives data-driven healthcare

Big data is coming to healthcare via a new service offered by consulting firm Deloitte.
Deloitte’s HealthEdata service is intended to improve health outcomes by providing the health sector with granular, customised information.
-----

NBN rollout targets set to be slashed

  • by: David Crowe, National affairs editor
  • From: The Australian
  • August 01, 2012 12:00AM
DELAYS to the $36 billion National Broadband Network have forced a deep cut to its construction targets in a new business plan that shows the project will reach less than a quarter of the homes first promised by the time of the next election.
New figures reveal the fibre network will pass fewer than 250,000 homes and businesses by next June, fewer than suggested by recent independent forecasts.
However, the company building the mammoth network will issue a new business plan tomorrow, insisting that it can connect millions of homes by 2016 under construction contracts that a Coalition government would find difficult to scrap.
-----

NBNs 'are about access, not speed'

GOVERNMENT-FUNDED national broadband networks should focus on closing the digital divide with a mix of affordable technologies, not on the fastest possible download speeds, according to a report by Britain's House of Lords communications committee.
The new report, which was released yesterday after a wide-ranging, six-month investigation, could sound warnings for the Australian government's NBN plans. The study raises concerns about the execution of Britain's national broadband policy, accusing the Conservative government of focusing too much on short-term speed targets and not enough on how less-well-off users can access high-speed broadband technologies.
-----

Dextrous robotic hand gets thumbs up

  • From: AAP
  • August 03, 2012 7:20AM
EUROPEAN researchers say they have developed the world's first real-sized, five-fingered robotic hand able to grasp and manipulate objects with human-like dexterity.
Getting robots to manoeuvre objects with precision has posed many problems for engineers in their quest to build humanoid machines to serve as domestic aides, emergency rescuers or factory workers.
Industrial robotic "grippers" already exist that are able to grasp objects and move them but are unable to handle items as a human hand would - grasping an egg without breaking it but also lifting heavy, bulky things.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Sunday, August 05, 2012

I Had Not Noticed This Service Had Kicked Off. Interesting How It Is Being Done With Another ‘Slow Launch’ I Suspect.

I noticed this a few days ago.

The National Health Services Directory (NHSD)

About Us

The National Health Services Directory (NHSD) is a convenient and accessible new resource.  It builds on and consolidates some existing regional healthcare directories to provide detailed information on available health related services to anyone with internet access.
The directory provides access to reliable information, and will assist you to choose and connect with the most appropriate health services for your current needs.
The NHSD covers the nation. It will be freely available and will include both public and private health sector providers from all Australian states and territories.
Implemented by the National Health Call Centre Network (NHCCN) on behalf of, and with the support of, all Australian Governments, the NHSD will initially provide service information for GPs, Pharmacies, Hospitals and Emergency Departments.
Developed to support health providers’ delivery of services in addition to facilitating public access to reliable information, the NHSD will be enhanced to include secure access to practitioner information as well as mental health, allied health and local hospital services data information.
To assist your planning and health service selection the NHSD will be further extended to include allied health providers and human services in the coming months.
The NHSD is being developed using national and emerging international standards based largely on the successful implementation of the Victorian Human Services Directory (VHSD) and other directories of significance around Australia.
Coverage will include but not be limited to healthcare and related human service providers. Information provided will include: service types and location; opening hours; languages spoken; access to bulk billing and supported types of communication.
The full website is found here:
This page I found very interesting.

Health Departments

The NHSD is a strategic component of the National Health Reform Agenda.  It is a joint initiative of all Australian governments which will not only support existing services but help enable many eHealth activities.
The National Health Services Directory will make use of existing data sets and directory information held by the various state and territory health departments.
This information will be updated, checked for consistency and extended to provide a national data set which can be used by all government health departments and other groups within the health sector.

Benefits of a shared and consistent national directory

  • Make available accurate and current provider and service information to support health professionals in their delivery of care planning and referrals
  • Help Australians search for and locate healthcare services and providers where and when they need them.

What the future holds

The NHSD creates a platform for ongoing inclusion and enrichment of data and functionality. The directory is expected to provide an Endpoint Locator Service (ELS) to assist in secure clinical messaging and to incorporate information for telehealth over coming years.
The page is found here:
From the FAQ we have the following:

Why was the National Health Services Directory (NHSD) created?

The NHSD has been developed to support health providers’ delivery of services in addition to facilitating public access to reliable information. It will be enhanced to include secure access to practitioner information as well as mental health, allied health and local hospital services data information. It is expected to provide an Endpoint Locator Service (ELS) to assist in secure clinical messaging and to incorporate information for telehealth over coming years. 
The time line for development is interesting:

When will Health Service Information be available via the NHSD?

Now
Service information for GPs, Pharmacies, Hospitals and Emergency Departments.
Late 2012
Increased secure and detailed information on services and practitioners for primary care, mental health and local hospital network services.
2013
Extensions to allied health and human services.
-----
The partners with the National Healthcare Call Centres Network (NHCCN) are the Jurisdiction and NEHTA.
As the site points out:
The NHSD (National Health Service Directory) is operated by the NHCCN on behalf of all Australian governments. It is a operated as a not-for-profit community resource. © All Rights Reserved.
Key to my interest in this is the proposal for the NHSD to - over time - develop an End Point Locator Service (ELS).
Why I am interested is that the ELS is one of the missing parts of workable NEHTA secure messaging which is, of course, a rather key part of the NEHRS program. Without safe and secure message transmission between providers and the NEHRS (both ways) the NEHRS is about as useful as a ‘barnacle on a battleship’.
Secure Message Delivery (SMD) requires (as well as the various network connectivity between sender and receiver) three things.
1. Standards regarding message content and handling (HL7 etc.) etc.
2. Encryption and message decoding standards (typically PKI as planned to NASH)
3. A directory that can permit the sender (and their message) to electronically find the intended recipient. This is where the ELS comes in.
We have a Standards Australia IT-14 Technical Report covering this area.

TR 5823-2010  - Endpoint location service.

Published:   05 Mar 2010
(Interestingly NEHTA and Microsoft seem to have contributed different views on this area and what underlying approach should be used.).
As I type there is no national ELS and reading the above it seems we are going to be waiting a while for what is said above is “It is expected to provide an Endpoint Locator Service (ELS) to assist in secure clinical messaging and to incorporate information for telehealth over coming years”.
In the meantime our various messaging providers each have their own directories for their users.
Also, of course, it seems NASH remains in a hole with all sorts of rumours around just what work is going on and just who, if anyone, is doing anything.
Essentially of the three parts you need we maybe have one at best - with the other two being just ‘twinkles in DoHA’s/NEHTA’s eyes’.
Just where this leaves a securely accessible NEHRS is anyone’s guess. So much for getting the ducks aligned before starting a project like the NEHRS.
Updates / answers as to what it all means on a postcard please (a comment will do!).
David.