Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 15th September, 2012.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

Is It Happening? Electronic Health Record Vendors Take Steps Toward Interoperability

Zina Moukheiber, Contributor
In a move that signals a shift in the health care industry, Epic Systems and Cerner are quietly working with Greenway Medical Technologies to link together their electronic health records for the purpose of exchanging patient information. Epic Systems, which has maintained a closed legacy EHR, sells to hospitals, as well as larger medical groups. Cerner dominates in hospitals, but with Greenway it can now offer another option to smaller practices, where it has less of a presence. (In another milestone, Epic will connect its own network of EHRs with Surescripts, the electronic prescription company).
Preoccupied with market share, vendors have largely resisted making their electronic health records interoperable, but the government is pushing to break down information exchange barriers for the benefit of patients. Medical information is now locked in silos, where it cannot be truly useful.
-----

Medication Alert Fatigue Is Curable

Medication alerts are supposed to ensure patient safety, but clinicians ignore them when bombarded with too many. This dilemma needs to be solved.
Medication alerts within EHRs can save lives, but as many clinicians are quick to point out, these alerts can also prove to be a major headache. The alerts sometimes note potential adverse effects that even first year medical students would know. While there's no perfect system, we can do better.
Given that between 33% and 96% of medical alerts are ignored, there's little doubt that providers need help in this regard. A good place to start is with a core set of critically important drug/drug interactions (DDIs) that everyone in your healthcare system needs to watch. AdTech Ad
-----

Real-time prescription database curbs 'doctor shopping'

September 7, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
A central, real-time database helped reduce the number of inappropriate prescriptions filled in British Columbia, according to an article published this week in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.
A real-time processing system called PharmaNet was installed in 1995, linking all pharmacies and hospitals in the province to a central database. To determine its effect on "doctor shopping" for inappropriate prescriptions, the researchers compared records before and after. They looked at prescription records between Jan. 1, 1993, and Dec. 31, 1997,  for residents who either were on social assistance or were ages 65 and older. They labeled prescriptions for opioids or benzodiazepines inappropriate if they were written for at least 30 tablets of the same drug by a different doctor and taken to a different pharmacy within seven days, according to MedPage Today.
-----

ONC tables regulation of Nationwide Health Information Network

September 7, 2012 | By Dan Bowman
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT will not pursue governance of the Nationwide Health Information Network, it revealed at yesterday's meeting of the Healthcare IT Policy Committee. National Coordinator for Health IT Farzad Mostashari, M.D., in a post to the Health IT Buzz blog today, said the decision was made so as "not to hobble" exchange activities already in motion across the industry and the nation.
In May, ONC issued a request for information on such governance. Its goals at the time included improving efficiency for health information exchange among different entities, avoiding potential conflicts between disparate governance structures of state HIEs and guiding the evolution of interoperability standards in the HIE marketplace.
-----

EHRs May Shortchange Depression Patients

Electronic health records may focus a doctor's attention on certain medical conditions, leading to undertreatment for depression, researchers suggest.
Patients with three or more chronic conditions are half as likely to receive treatment for their depression during a visit to a doctor's office that uses electronic health records (EHRs) when compared with patients who visited paper-based practices. At least that's the conclusion of an investigation recently published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Florida and the University of South Florida, analyzed the odds of receiving treatment for depression during a doctor's visit by examining data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS) of 3,467 physician office visits by patients from 2006 to 2008. Researchers focused on visits to primary care providers by patients ages 18 and older with physician-identified depression. The 3,467 visits were divided into two groups: 2,584 visits to practices without EHRs, and 883 visits to practices with EHRs. AdTech Ad
-----
Wednesday, September 5, 2012

EHRs: Which Ones Doctors Like and How Their Lives Changed

From the survey: "EHRs have become a fact of life. Eighty-two percent of survey respondents either currently use EHRs or are in the process of implementing them, up from just 38% in Medscape's 2009 EHR survey. Even holdouts are reluctantly buying in: 12% of respondents said they'll purchase or begin using an EHR within the next year or two, and only 6% said they have no plans to buy an EHR.
-----

Surescripts to boost clinical interoperability for Epic

By Bernie Monegain, Editor
Created 09/06/2012
ARLINGTON, VA – Surescripts and health IT company Epic are working together to connect Epic’s Care Everywhere interoperability platform to the Surescripts Clinical Interoperability Network. 
The connectivity will allow healthcare providers that use Epic’s EHR to securely send and receive clinical information, including referrals, discharge summaries and lab results, with peers locally, between practices and across health systems, Surecripts executives announced today.
-----

UPMC and IBM keep focus on big data for personalized medicine

By Mike Miliard, Managing Editor
Created 09/05/2012
PITTSBURGH – UPMC has renewed an agreement with IBM, investing $120 million over the next four years in technology that will help spur changes in the way treatments are designed for individual patients by more effectively analyzing massive volumes of patient and research data. 
Under its initial agreement with IBM, signed in 2005, UPMC saved more than $191 million over six years, eliminating the need to create a new data center and supporting UPMC's growth, officials say.
-----

Study: Tailor clinical decision support, allow for flexibility

September 5, 2012 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Determining problem areas in need of clinical decision support and the supports themselves varies by medical specialty and should be determined by "deliberative analysis," according to a new study provisionally published this week in BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making.
The Meaningful Use incentive program requires providers to implement CDS interventions that can improve performance on clinical quality measures. However, "[n]o framework exists to systematically assess potential CDS objectives to ensure that 1) they address the most critical gaps in care, and 2) they are clinically meaningful to the broad range of specialties participating in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program," the authors noted.
-----

EMIS prescribes tablets for Web

7 September 2012   Lyn Whitfield
EMIS has unveiled a mobile version of EMIS Web at its national user group in Warwick.
The EMIS Mobile app is compatible with major tablet computer platforms, including iOS, Android and Windows 8, and can be used both on and offline, to cover areas in which there is no connectivity.
Functionality includes the ability to access a diary and appointment schedule, to view patient records and to add consultations.
-----

DH launches ITK ideas fund

31 August 2012   Lyn Whitfield
The Department of Health has launched an Information Sharing Challenge Fund to support information sharing projects that can be replicated across the NHS through the interoperability toolkit.
In a ‘dear colleagues’ letter sent out this morning, Ailsa Claire, transition director of the patients and information directorate at the NHS Commissioning Board, says the scheme is “designed to improve patient care by stimulating the creation of new and innovative digital services.”
She adds that these ideas must be “underpinned by robust and effective information sharing based on approaches that are re-usable across the NHS.”
-----

Data analytics key to leveraging ENCODE DNA project discoveries

September 6, 2012 | By Julie Bird
It turns out there's a purpose to the so-called "junk" DNA comprising most of the human genome--and health technology will play a major role in unlocking more of its secrets.
Much of the material contains more than 4 million "molecular switches" that regulate the genes in DNA, NPR reports in summarizing the findings published Wednesday in more than two dozen scholarly journals.
-----

IOM: Technology a must to fix 'complex, costly' healthcare

September 6, 2012 | By Dan Bowman
Better use of technology to capture and share health data is necessary for the healthcare industry to make systematic changes that will lead to better quality care and lower costs, according to a new report published today by the Institute of Medicine.
The IOM calls America's current healthcare system "far too complex and costly" to continue on its current path, pointing out the inefficiencies have led to billions of dollars wasted on unnecessary care and tens of thousands of deaths that might otherwise have been prevented.
-----

Study: HIEs Need Metrics to Address Quality of Care, ROI

Written by Kathleen Roney | September 05, 2012
Social Sharing
Only 50 percent of health information exchanges use or plan to use metrics to measure their impact, according to a study published in American Health Information Management Association's Perspectives in Health Information Management.
Ninety-six HIEs completed a 21-question survey, but valid responses were only received from 18. Under eHealth Initiative criteria, all participating HIEs qualified as Stage 5 or higher, meaning they were a "fully operational health information organization; transmitting data that is being used by healthcare stakeholders," according to the study. Results from the survey showed that most of the HIE respondents operate as non-profit organizations, serve large patient populations and have annual budgets of more than $1 million.
-----
Thursday, September 06, 2012

How To Ensure the Success of Hospital IT Projects

by Fred Bazzoli
Getting clinicians to add one more routine to their day is usually painful. It can be excruciating if caregivers figure out they'll be repetitively doing that routine dozens of times a day.
And when you can't promise it will save anyone any time for the foreseeable future, you've got a tough sell ahead of you.
But Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, has been able to achieve wide and consistent adoption of a bar-code bedside medication verification system, reporting that more than 97% of medications and patients are scanned before drugs are delivered to patients.
-----

Genomics is Here, But is Health I.T. Ready to Support It?

SEP 4, 2012 4:28pm ET
The most hyped scientific achievement of our time-the complete sequencing of the human genome in 2003-has taken awhile to make its utility obvious in clinical care. But consider:
*Nicholas Volker of Monona, Wis., has made it past the age of 5 because a full sequencing of his genome at the Medical College of Wisconsin revealed the rare genetic variant underlying the disease that was making holes in his intestines-an answer that had eluded all standard genetic testing. The research team also confirmed that his particular genetic profile made a bone marrow transplant the right treatment choice. Nicholas hasn't had an intestinal surgery since then-after enduring 100 of them before the diagnosis-and can eat real food. The medical college now reviews a steady stream of requests to sequence the genomes of children with mysterious diseases.
-----

Stage 2 casts mHealth in small role, critical nonetheless

By Eric Wicklund, Contributing Editor
Created 09/05/2012
WASHINGTON – With close to 700 pages to peruse, the newly released guidelines for Stage 2 Meaningful Use and the 2014 Edition Standards & Certification Criteria (S&CC) present a challenge for almost anyone. And for those looking for references to mHealth, the reward is meager: Only seven mentions of the word "mobile" in the final rule and its accompanying final rule for EHR standards and certification.
Still, experts say mHealth will play a significant role in the latest stage of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid's (CMS) electronic health record incentive program, which places the spotlight on coordination of care and paves the way for improved outcomes.
-----

CSC signs new deal with DH

4 September 2012   Chris Thorne
CSC and the Department of Health have agreed a new deal that the DH says will save the NHS more than £1 billion.
It will also remove CSC’s exclusive rights to be the only provider of clinical IT systems in the North, Midlands and East of England. 
Today's announcement ends a long saga of negotiations about the future of CSC's local service provider contract, signed as part of the National Programme for IT in the NHS.
The term of the latest agreement extends through July 2016 and in some cases contracts will extend to 2021. Crucially, the new arrangement appears to quash the threat of legal action from either side.
-----

Delaware HIE wants to be 'another pillar' of health information

By Anthony Brino, Associate Editor
Delaware became the first U.S. state in 1787, and its health information exchange, the Delaware Health Information Network (DHIN), became the country’s first statewide HIE in 2007.
Today, DHIN is kind of pushing the bounds of HIE by creating business lines with insurers and the government, offering new data analysis services and apparently offering a guide to states with still-nascent HIE systems.
About 95 percent of Delaware providers are DHIN participants, as are all the state’s acute care hospitals. Of course it’s a tiny state, with three counties and 907,000 residents. But others are watching. Health IT policy makers and researchers from 25 states have sought DHIN’s advice on HIE policy and systems, said Michael Sims, DHIN CFO.
-----

EHRs Feed Clinical Research Machine

One-million-patient study provides further evidence that EHRs and analytics tools can advance clinical research.
A major medical study that used EHR data to comb through the clinical records of nearly one million patients shows that advanced technology can have a significant impact on clinical research.
The study, which was recently published in the online edition of the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, involved a team of data experts at MetroHealth Medical Center and Explorys Inc., a Cleveland Clinic spinoff company that provides a health data analytics platform. AdTech Ad
The study tried to find out whether height and/or weight can make a person more susceptible to blood clots in the lung or leg.
-----

The problems with BYOD

By Eric Wicklund, Contributing Editor
A recent survey should raise some alarms among healthcare providers who have adopted or are considering a bring-your-own-device (BYOD) strategy.
The survey, conducted by Coalfire, indicates that security isn't high on the list of priorities – for both the employer and employee. And as a result, officials warned, many healthcare organizations may be violating HIPAA guidelines for protecting sensitive patient data.
"They're not keeping pace with the changes in technology," said Rick Dakin, CEO and chief security strategist for the Louisville, Colo.-based IT governance, risk and compliance firm. "And this isn't just a minor shift – it's the tectonic plates of IT shifting."
-----

The cloud as a health data nexus for ACO

By Gary Palgon, Vice president of healthcare solutions, Liaison Technologies
The imminence of accountable care already is beginning to transform the way healthcare is organized. It logically follows that the information technology (IT) necessary to support Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is also changing under our feet. The massive shift of patients to the ambulatory sector to achieve lower-cost care, the need for coordinated care among diverse providers and the analytics required to manage population health are all moving the IT dial to a new frequency. That new frequency is likely to be the cloud.
Although the federal government originated the concept of ACOs as a value-based reimbursement model for Medicare and Medicaid, commercial insurers have also seized upon it as a viable answer to higher quality, more cost-effective care. The goal is to connect hospitals, physician offices, laboratories and other parts of the healthcare continuum to offer preventive, evidence-based medicine that achieves the best clinical outcomes possible. However, connectivity within and among a wide variety of stakeholders is essential before that goal can be reached.
-----

HL7 to Offer Free License for Standards, Other Properties

SEP 4, 2012 12:12pm ET
Standards development organization Health Level Seven International will make much of its intellectual property available via a free license, an initiative expected to start during the first quarter of 2013.
The free property includes all standards, domain analysis models, profiles, implementation guides and some tools. The intellectual property will not be licensed on the open source market, under which other developers may make enhancements. The freely available property means the content must be licensed for use but the license is free. HL7 will continue to control the content, which will continue to be developed and balloted following the organization’s internal rules and standard development requirements under the American National Standards Institute.
-----

HL7 standards to be free of charge

Posted: September 4, 2012 - 2:45 pm ET
The healthcare standards development organization Health Level Seven will make much of its intellectual property, including its key Clinical Document Architecture standard, available without charge to healthcare organizations and without the previously required HL7 membership.
"It's been a year in the planning," said Dr. Charles Jaffe, CEO of the Ann Arbor, Mich.-based organization. The HL7 board took a final vote Aug. 1 to go forward with the plan. "I can tell you that the board was unanimous in this and as hard as it is to believe, they firmly will position this as, 'This was the right thing to do.' "
-----

Lansley out, Hunt in

4 September 2012   EHI staff
Andrew Lansley has lost his job as health secretary in a government reshuffle and will become the leader of the House of Commons.
Lansley, who has led the Department of Health since 2010 and has overseen the controversial ‘Liberating the NHS’ reforms, will be replaced by Jeremy Hunt.
Hunt has also come under scrutiny in recent months in his role as secretary of state for culture, olympics, media and sport, because of the role played by one of his special advisors in News Corporation’s bid for BSkyB.
-----

CDC will use Direct protocol for health safety network

By Mary Mosquera
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) needs a health information service provider to deploy the Direct secure messaging protocol to make it easier and more automated for providers to send data to the National Healthcare Safety Network.
The secure transport standard will assist providers in transmitting data from electronic health records (EHRs) and other healthcare information systems using the Health Level 7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) standard for automated entry into the agency’s safety surveillance system, according to an Aug. 28 announcement in Federal Business Opportunities
-----
Transitioning to EMRs
Proactive planning is essential to a successful conversion.
By Sandeep Soni
Five years seems like a lot of time to make a transition to electronic medical records (EMRs), but as time continues to tick away the deadline is looming closer every day. The federal government promised funding to hospitals and other health systems to help defray the astronomical conversion costs with the goals of providing greater safety for patients. Failure to comply by 2015 will result in catastrophic financial loss to healthcare providers from Medicare.
This plan is currently under way, and both medical professionals and IT experts are scrambling to find ways to adhere to the timeline and ensure federal incentives. Prudent healthcare IT leaders realize that proactive planning is essential to ensure seamless, cost-effective transitions that both improve efficiency and maintain customer satisfaction. To successfully transfer to EMRs by the 2015 deadline, hospitals must start making preparation for the conversion now.
-----

Blue Button reaches 1 million users

Posted: August 31, 2012 - 6:00 pm ET
What's big and blue and not IBM?
The basic Blue Button technology developed by the healthcare arm of the U.S. Veterans Affairs Department. On Friday, the VA announced that Blue Button had recorded its 1 millionth registered user in less than two years.
Blue Button, named for the Web icon that triggers its use, allows veterans to access and download copies of their medical records and has proven immensely popular among veterans since it was rolled out in fall 2010 after being introduced in a speech by President Barack Obama in August of that year.
-----

Damage from Healthcare Data Breaches Spreading

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , August 30, 2012

Almost twice as many people were affected by healthcare data breaches in 2011 as in 2010, according to a report released on Wednesday. The total number of breaches dropped by 32% to 145 but the number of people affected by those breaches doubled to 10.8 million.
The drop in occurrences reflects increased security controls and investigation procedures put in place to uncover data breaches, explains Tyler Quinn, a CPA who co-authored the report for Kaufman, Rossin, and Co., a Miami-based accounting and business consulting firm.
-----

10 Healthcare IT Predictions for the Next Year

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , September 4, 2012

In honor of National Health IT Week next week, here are my top 10 predictions for healthcare IT for the next 12 months—none of them involving Meaningful Use or ICD-10!
1. Patients ask, where's my data? Patients will organize a single-day national event called Where's My Medical Data, in which providers and payers will be besieged by emails and phone calls from patients wanting their medical records. Patients will complain loudly at the slowness of the responses, the outright refusal by some providers, and the complexity of the records received.
While the scenario might not play out exactly in this form, I heard this proposal floated at the recent Healthcare Unbound conference in San Francisco, where it received the encouragement of Farzad Mostashari, the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology within the federal Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. It hasn't yet become an ONC initiative (they are a little busy right now), but patients might lead the way.
-----
Tuesday, September 04, 2012

Tracking Rx Misuse: State Programs Making Gains

by Bonnie Darves, iHealthBeat Contributing Reporter
Prescription monitoring programs (PMPs) that track when and where prescriptions for controlled substances are filled and who receives the medications are beginning to show results. The programs, now operational in 41 states and "on the books" legislatively in 49, neither purport nor promise to eradicate the country's narcotic-abuse epidemic -- deaths related to opioid use more than tripled between 1999 and 2008. But monitoring appears to be making a dent.
States with well-established PMPs are reporting reductions in doctor shopping and diversion of controlled substances and are finding that their programs are helping health care professionals make better informed clinical prescribing decisions, according to a recent report from the PMP Center of Excellence at Brandeis University in Massachusetts.
-----

Find the NEWS on an app

31 August 2012   Chris Thorne
An app has been launched in Wales to help hospital staff use the National Early Warning Score to identify patients who are developing serious illnesses, such as sepsis.
The app, which can be downloaded from Apple’s App Store for free, has been developed by 1000 Lives Plus in conjunction with Cardiff Medical Apps.
1000 Lives Plus is Wales’ national improvement programme, supporting organisations and individuals to deliver the highest quality and safest healthcare for patients.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, September 14, 2012

This Is Really Just An Outrage and Has To Be Condemned. Someone is Being Greedy After The Fact. Clearly They Are Serious Exploitative Creeps.

The following came to my attention a few days ago. These sort of actions really damage one’s faith in human nature!

Copyright and Open Access at the Bedside

John C. Newman, M.D., Ph.D., and Robin Feldman, J.D.
N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2447-2449 December 29, 2011
For three decades after its publication, in 1975, the Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) was widely distributed in textbooks, pocket guides, and Web sites and memorized by countless residents and medical students. The simplicity and ubiquity of this 30-item screening test — covering such functions as arithmetic, memory, language comprehension, visuospatial skills, and orientation — made it the de facto standard for cognitive screening. Yet all that time, it was under copyright protection. In 2000, its authors, Marshal Folstein, Susan Folstein, and Paul McHugh, began taking steps to enforce their rights, first transferring the copyright to MiniMental, a corporation the Folsteins founded, and then in 2001 granting a worldwide exclusive license to Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR) to publish, distribute, and manage all intellectual property rights.1,2 A licensed version of the MMSE can now be purchased from PAR for $1.23 per test. The MMSE form is gradually disappearing from textbooks, Web sites, and clinical tool kits.1
Clinicians' response to this “lockdown” has been muted. A few commentators have expressed concern about continuing to use a now-proprietary tool in training2 or about implications for the developing world,1 echoing debates about patented pharmaceuticals. In our experience, many clinicians are either unaware of the MMSE's copyright restrictions or simply ignore them, despite the risk of copyright infringement.
But then in March 2011, a promising new cognitive screening tool that was to be available through “open access,” the Sweet 16 — a 16-item assessment of thinking, learning, and memory developed by Harvard's Tamara Fong3 — was removed from the Internet at the request of PAR in an apparent copyright dispute.4 The Sweet 16 includes orientation and three-object recall items, similar to the MMSE's, along with a digit-span item. This action, unprecedented for a bedside clinical assessment tool, has sent a chill through the academic community; clearly, clinicians and researchers can no longer live in blissful ignorance of copyright.
Copyright derives from one of the few powers explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Any new intellectual work is under copyright protection automatically from the moment it is fixed in a tangible medium of expression — a category now including blog posts, iPhone apps, and cognitive screening tools. Copyright law grants the author (or owner, for copyright can be transferred) exclusive rights to copy the work, distribute it, make works derivative of it, and perform or display it publicly. These rights last for 70 years past the date of the author's death, or up to 120 years from the time of creation if the work was done “for hire.” This duration has been retroactively extended several times, so that works published as early as 1923 may remain under copyright today (and will until at least 2019).
For persons or entities other than the copyright holder to copy or distribute a work, they must have permission from the owner, usually in the form of a license. Copying or distribution without permission is copyright infringement and carries stiff civil or even criminal penalties. There is limited protection under “fair use” law for certain nonprofit uses of limited parts of a work — for example, for teaching or research — but that exception is narrower than it sounds. One need not have intended to infringe someone's copyright to be subject to damages of up to $30,000 per work, and willful infringers pay up to $150,000 — and may, under certain circumstances, be subject to a jail term.
For clinicians, the risk of infringement is real. Photocopying or downloading the MMSE probably constitutes infringement; those who publish the MMSE on a Web site or pocket card could incur more severe penalties for distribution. Even more chilling is the “takedown” of the Sweet 16, apparently under threat of legal action from PAR (although PAR has not commented publicly). Are the creators of any new cognitive test that includes orientation questions or requires a patient to recall three items subject to action by PAR? However disputable the legal niceties, few physicians or institutions would want to have to argue their case in court.
The MMSE case may be a harbinger of more to come. Many clinical tools we take for granted, such as the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, fall into the same “benign neglect” copyright category as the MMSE did before 2000. At any time, they might be pulled back behind a wall of active copyright enforcement by the authors or their heirs.
Lots more here (freely available):
This really is an utter outrage. If the authors were going to charge for their form, and warned people openly - it would never have gained global recognition and use (and value) and to come back 20+ years later and demand payment is - for an important clinical tool - is just not nice at all.
I have no idea why people can get away with greedy stuff like this!
David.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

This Is A Very Interesting List Of the Big Health IT Themes For 2013.

This appeared a few days ago:

10 Healthcare IT Predictions for the Next Year

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , September 4, 2012

In honor of National Health IT Week next week, here are my top 10 predictions for healthcare IT for the next 12 months—none of them involving Meaningful Use or ICD-10!
1. Patients ask, where's my data? Patients will organize a single-day national event called Where's My Medical Data, in which providers and payers will be besieged by emails and phone calls from patients wanting their medical records. Patients will complain loudly at the slowness of the responses, the outright refusal by some providers, and the complexity of the records received.
While the scenario might not play out exactly in this form, I heard this proposal floated at the recent Healthcare Unbound conference in San Francisco, where it received the encouragement of Farzad Mostashari, the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology within the federal Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. It hasn't yet become an ONC initiative (they are a little busy right now), but patients might lead the way.
2. Higher software prices allow EMR makers to staff up. Providers in turn will call upon software makers of electronic medical records to redesign their products to allow easy generation of records for patient use. A rise in the cost of such products, due to a supply squeeze, will enable EMR software makers to raid the ranks of other high-tech companies such as Google and Microsoft in order to staff up. But the principles embodied in Fred Brooks' timeless book, The Mythical Man-Month, will slow progress; adding designers and programmers still doesn't produce linear progress in software.
3. The human touch becomes a major tech issue. A bumper sticker spotted where I live in Berkeley, CA, says, "It's become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity." We are running a risk of losing the human touch in an age of health tech marvels. Teams may be communicating better than ever, but from the patient's point of view it's a blur of emails, messages, phone calls, and faces. The medical home is one response to the depersonalization of medicine. Can tech provide other "repersonalizing" experiences? Examples include videoconferencing, social networking, technology-mediated support groups, and simple time on the phone with a physician.
Read the remaining seven predictions here:
I have to say that Scott has come up with a very interesting list that needs to be carefully thought through by all those interested in where we are heading - and indeed where we need to head.
David.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

I Suspect This Is A Really Big Deal. I Wonder How It Will Work Out?

The following was announced a little while ago:

HL7 to offer its interoperability standards for free

September 5, 2012 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Standards development icon Health Level Seven International (HL7) has decided to offer its intellectual property, including its standards for interoperability, free of charge via licensing agreements, beginning in 2013.
"HL7's vision is to make its collaborative, consensus-driven standards the best and most widely used in healthcare," said CEO Charles Jaffe, M.D., in the announcement. "By eliminating this barrier to implementation, we can come closer to realizing our goal, in which healthcare IT can reduce costs and improve the quality of care."
According to HL7's PowerPoint explaining the decision, the organization chose to provide its standards to more effectively advance interoperability, help government agencies, vendors and academia fulfill their goals and be more closely aligned with other standards organizations.
In addition to the standards, HL7 also will provide for free implementation guides, some tooling, and other information. Education and training, certification, and most publications will not be available for free.
.....
To learn more:
- here's the
announcement
- read Halamka's
blog
- here's HL7's
PowerPoint presentation
- see Mostashari's
tweet
More here:
There is also some Australian comment:

HL7 IP to be free to use

Posted on September 4, 2012 by Grahame Grieve
Today, the HL7 Board of Directors committed to licensing its standards and other selected HL7 intellectual property free of charge. This policy is consistent with HL7’s vision of making our collaborative and consensus-driven standards the most widely used in healthcare, and with our mission of achieving interoperability in ways that put the needs of our stakeholders first. Our primary aim is to maximize benefits to our members, the healthcare community, and all those who have contributed to make HL7 standards so successful.
I endorse this change – but it won’t be without pain, particularly in the shorter term. Keith recognised my work as one of the contributing factors:
Graham Grieve insisted that his IP which became FHIR, wouldn’t be given to HL7 unless certain stipulations were agreed to about its availability
Well, thanks Keith. But what this does mean is that I’ve been thinking about this already, and I’m worried about it. HL7 is a (not for profit) business built around a particular revenue model. For me, making FHIR free was non-threatening because FHIR is not a contributor to the bottom line today, and because the other standards would continue to function as they did. Making the other standards free, well, that changes things. The FAQ link above says:
What is the expected impact of licensing HL7′s IP free of charge in terms of membership?
We anticipate that the decision to remove cost barriers will increase membership within HL7. In the U.S., for example, HL7 standards are integral to Meaningful Use. The need for industry input on the HL7 standards selected for Meaningful Use Stage 2 is one significant factor that will help drive increases in both membership and HL7 member participation, which is crucial to making our standards easier to use.
More here:
There is also an very interesting guest post:

Guest Post: Lloyd McKenzie on HL7′s IP Announcement

Posted on September 5, 2012 by Grahame Grieve
Note: This is a guest post from Lloyd McKenzie, a follow up to my previous post. These are not necessarily my opinions, though I sort of generally agree. I’ll happily post other guest posts on this subject if people submit them to me.
I’m going to be a bit more blunt than Grahame.
I don’t object to HL7 content being free to non-members, but I’m hugely nervous (using polite words, seeing as this is a public blog) about the potential outcomes and the timing of the announcement.  Specifically I’m concerned about the announcement of a decision with huge consequences for the viability and direction of the organization with a side note that “we’re still working out the details”.
This is not an announcement that’s reversible.  If HL7 changes its mind, we lose all market credibility, so we’re now in the position of having to release the IP for free whether we can come up with a viable business model or not.  And from the sounds of things, the viable business model is part of the details to be worked out.  That doesn’t seem like wise planning in my books.
However, for better or worse, the decision’s now been made.  Given that I have a strong intellectual, emotional and financial attachment to the HL7 organization and would like to see it succeed for many more years, it becomes all the more important to figure out what a viable business model could look like.  There’s not a lot of time to get this right because the revenue stream from the old business model is going to start drying up tomorrow (regardless of the fact that the change to IP rights won’t take effect for “months”).
This guest blog is going to be a bit longer than a blog entry probably ought to be.  That’s because the issues here aren’t simple.  (If they were, HL7 would have adopted a new business model long ago.)  My intention is to get a discussion started now so that we can make good progress at the WGM and move quickly from the analysis stage to the implementation stage.
All the details and comments here:
I think both Grahame and Lloyd have an important concern that does not seem to be yet resolved and that is how the continued evolution and support of HL7 is to be paid for and nourished.
As both point out this is now a rather uncertain ‘work in progress’.
Clearly this is a huge move on the part of HL7 - but I have to say I wonder what we will finally wind up with a decade from now.
Given the extensive use of HL7 artefacts and ideas in Australia this is important both here and in the US.
David.