Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, September 21, 2012

The Scale Of The Mess That Is The US Health System Is Barely Believable. Sadly It Is Real However.

The following report appeared a few days ago:

IOM report: Informatics, transparency and data to fix healthcare crisis

By Erin McCann, Associate Editor
Created 09/06/2012
WASHINGTON – The U.S. healthcare system has long been laden with growing inefficiencies, heightened costs and increasing complexities, all of which have stymied industry progress, according to a new Institute of Medicine (IOM) report.  
However, report officials also noted existing knowledge, transparency, and new informatics tools wield the potential to mend the  –  some say broken  – healthcare system to achieve continuous improvement and better quality care at lower costs. 
In a Thursday morning live webcast of the IOM report release, Mark Smith, MD, president and CEO of California HealthCare Foundation and committee chair said two fundamental issues are currently facing the U.S. healthcare system: cost and complexity. Thus the mission of the report was “to find the foundational characteristics of a system that is efficient,” said Smith. 
According to the report, the costs of the system's current inefficiencies underscore the urgent need for a system-wide transformation. The committee calculated that approximately 30 percent of health spending in 2009 – roughly $750 billion – was wasted on unnecessary services, excessive administrative costs, fraud and other problems.  
The U.S. pays some of the highest costs for healthcare, but “at the same time, we do not attain the results in health outcomes and performances that others are able to achieve,"  said IOM President Harvey Feinburg, MD, in the live webcast. “How do we face up to that reality?”
Smith added that a “30 percent increase in income has been effectively eliminated by a 76 percent increase in healthcare costs,” leaving the U.S. healthcare system full of “wasted opportunity.”
Moreover, inefficiencies can potentially lead to patient suffering.  By one estimate, roughly 75,000 deaths might have been averted in 2005 if every state had delivered care at the quality level of the best performing state.
Incremental upgrades and changes by individual hospitals or providers will not suffice, the committee said. Achieving higher quality care at lower cost will require an across-the-board commitment to transform the U.S. health system into a "learning" system that continuously improves by systematically capturing and broadly disseminating lessons from every care experience and new research discovery.  
.....
The report was sponsored by the Blue Shield of California Foundation, Charina Endowment Fund, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.  
Read the full awful story here:
Wasting $750 Billion is really quite something!
Here is another report with a link to the free pre-publication draft:

New IOM Report Seeks a New Path for Health Care

SEP 6, 2012 4:40pm ET
The American health care system is in deep trouble and needs a “systemwide transformation,” of which better use of data is a major component toward improvement, according to a new report from the Institute of Medicine.
The report concludes that the health care system is too complex and costly to continue business as usual. Authors contend 30 percent of health care spending in 2009 was wasted, and cite a rough estimate that 75,000 deaths could have been averted in 2005 if every state delivered care at the quality level of the best performing state.
The ways that providers train, practice and learn new information cannot keep pace with new discoveries and technological advancements. And care delivery and payment practices lead to inefficiencies and may hinder improvement. “The threats to Americans’ health and economic security are clear and compelling, and it’s time to get all hands on deck,” says Mark Smith, president and CEO at the California HealthCare Foundation.
Better use of data would facilitate better treatment of 75 million patients with more than one chronic condition by improving care coordination and having quick access to best practices, according to the report. “For example, it took 13 years for the use of beta blockers to become standard practice after they were shown to improve survival rates for heart attack victims.”
.....
The report, Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America, “demonstrates how a health care system that delivers the best care at lower cost is not only necessary, but also possible,” says Harvey Fineberg, M.D., president of IOM, in a foreword. The report is available here in a free pre-publication version.
 The full article is found here:
Lastly this article summarises the recommendations:

IOM Urges 10 Major Healthcare Fixes

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , September 7, 2012

The U.S. healthcare system operates like an ATM machine that takes days to release cash. It functions like a home construction project whose carpenters and plumbers use different blueprints. And it does business like a store that prices items depending on who is making the purchase.
It fails to contain wasteful spending, estimated at about $765 billion in 2009 alone, largely from unnecessary and inefficiently delivered services, excess administrative costs and overpricing, and in fraud and missed prevention opportunities.
Those are some of the findings from a 382-page report the Institute of Medicine released Thursday calling for a major overhaul to remove inefficiencies and other barriers to quality care.
The report, "Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America," was prepared by a 17-person committee chaired by Mark Smith, President and CEO of the California HealthCare Foundation.
"We tried to address a big-deal problem in a way that is very comprehensive, because we feel much of what has been said to this point has been in bits and fragments," says Gary Kaplan, MD, a member of the authoring committee as well as Chairman and CEO of Virginia Mason Health System in Seattle. Providers, payers, patients, funders, the government—everyone—has to see quality, outcomes, technology, fraud and waste in a holistic fashion.
Kaplan adds that the committee hopes "that the first thing to come from this is awareness. Too many providers are saying to themselves, 'We're alive and well; we know change is coming, but we're banking that change will be glacial, so we don't have to do much right now. We're profitable.' "
A case in point is the transition to electronic health records and the attainment of meaningful use attestation. While some providers may see these moves largely as big expenditures, for which they may recoup some federal incentive payments, they may overlook the enormous potential of using EHRs to gather real-time data on inappropriate, unnecessary or incorrect use of expensive hospital resources.
"We can know for the last 100 patients who had X procedure, we have this percent of complication. We know that in real time, not through 18-month-old data. This is not an abstraction, and can provide us with early warning signs and places where we may intervene."
The report issues 10 recommendations to improve quality of care, and use healthcare resources better.
Read the 10 recommendation here:
All you can say reading this is that they have a very hungry tiger by the tail and that is looks like sensible use of Health IT will be a major contributor to fixing it over the next 20 or so years!
One really has to wonder how it got as bad as it now seems. A ‘boiling frog’ issue I suspect.
David.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Yet Again We Find Truth Getting In the Way Of A Good Story. E-Health Is A Lot Harder Than It Seems.

The following appeared a few days ago.

Study: EHR data for research often incomplete, inaccurate, unreliable

September 10, 2012 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Current methodologies for using electronic health records for research are inadequate and result in "significant bias" when used "naively," according to an article in the Journal of the Medical Informatics Association.
At present, EHR research involves an approach that first involves phenotyping/feature extraction, which transforms raw EHR data into clinical relevant features. Those feature are used for research tasks. According to the article's authors, however, EHR data currently is incomplete, inaccurate, variable, and highly complex, rendering such research unreliable.
The authors, from Columbia University, suggest that the research process be improved, particularly by improving the current phenotyping process to make it more accurate and data driven. They recommend that researchers take a "radical shift in approach" and study EHRs themselves, not just the data, to see how EHRs are used and how data is recorded.     
"We must mine the EHR data to learn the idiosyncrasies of the healthcare process and their effects on the recording process," the authors state.
.....
More here:
You can go directly to the abstract from this link:
JAMIA article's abstract
The full text will be available in a few months for free from Pub Med.
What is being said is, however, pretty clear. We have a lot to learn about how information is held in EHRs - let alone secondary systems like the NEHRS - before we can make any trustworthy use of the information.
Since they have not done the research NEHTA, DoHA and all have no idea if what they have done will be any use for all those research uses.
David.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The Recently Concluded Listed Company Reporting Season Threw Up A Ripper in the E-Health Space.

The following was filed on the very last possible day of the reporting season by Global Health Pty Ltd. (GLH:ASX)
As I had the misfortune to own a few shares in the company a few years ago I thought I would have a browse of the Annual Report.
You can have your copy from here:
Unless I badly miss the mark this is an extremely sick little puppy we have here.
First we note:
RESULTS FOR ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE MARKET
Revenues from ordinary activities down 21% to 4,148,000
Loss from ordinary activities after tax attributable to members up 194% to (658,000)
Loss for the period attributable to members up 204% to (657,000)
Dividends (distributions) Nil
Net tangible assets per ordinary security (0.63)¢ Prior Period (0.15)¢
Additionally we can note that the investment in support and maintenance has fallen while marketing costs have risen.
And guess what we are then told:
“Despite a 45% increase in sales and marketing expenditure to approximately $1.35M (2011: $0.926M) over the period, the expected return in new sales was not achieved.
The sales effort was directed to the business development of the Company’s:
  • MasterCare Shared electronic Medical Record,
  • ReferralNet connectivity platform, and,
  • LifeCard Personal Health Record;
to support the improved management of population health outcomes within geographical regions.”
The reasons were given as:
There were two major reasons for the lack of sales closure across the non-acute customer segment:
  •  the delivery of National e-health Infrastructure provided through government agencies was directed at vendors of GP software and trials at 12 “Wave” pilot sites. The 12 pilots were selected from 91 tenders submitted by Health Agencies. Global Health platforms were involved in 16 out of 91 submissions but  were not among the successful tenders. This effectively curtailed demand for our e-health platforms from the public sector;
  •  the government announced the establishment of 61 new Medicare Locals nationwide which replaced funding previously provided to 120 Divisions of General Practice. The new Medicare Locals, which are regional clusters representing General Practice, Specialists and Allied Health providers, were progressively operational from July 2011, January 2012 and July 2012. These new regional entities will determine demand for the Company’s eHealth platforms for population health. However, there have been significant delays in the time taken to confirm the new organizational structures and funding conditions. Consequently, demand for the Company’s eHealth platforms have slipped.
The level of sickness is clear from here:
“FORWARD OUTLOOK
Business development through organic growth is extremely sensitive to the pace and success of the government’s Health Reform agenda.
The operating profile of the Company has been adjusted to reflect the existing lack of scale and difficulty in engaging with public sector health providers especially given the poor outlook on the financial status of the three largest states – NSW, VIC & QLD and the general uncertainty of the business environment.
The results reinforce the Directors view that the Company’s lack of scale is the major impediment to improving shareholder value.
Consequently, the Company has engaged in preliminary discussions with a variety of parties to consider merger and amalgamation opportunities that can achieve the necessary tipping point in terms of scale that will rectify the current lack of shareholder value and enable EBITDA growth into the future.”
Translation - we are dead ducks and are up for sale to anyone who can help.
This view is rather confirmed by the fact that cash on hand as of June 30, 2012 was a fabulous $ 11,659.
I have to say this company really looks like a mining explorer. It has not much cash, is spending more than it earns and has taken over $20 million of funds from investors in its life. If ever something was run to pay management and staff salaries and not shareholders this is it!
It will be interesting to see what happens next. Pity they did not agree to be bought by iSoft a few years ago when it was rumoured that was on the cards.
The last point to be made about all this is just how damaging working with Government can be. It is clear at least part of the problem is government delay etc.!
Glad I sold out a good few years ago! Really pretty sad the way things have gone especially since at least some of their software seems to work pretty well.
David.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 18th September, 2012.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Really a very quiet week in e-Health but in the sector there is a fair bit happening. Biggest news is NSW following Queensland in taking an axe to the staffing levels in the State Health System.
It will only with time will we see what impact all these job cuts will have on overall service levels and especially e-Health. The cuts certainly seem to be pretty draconian.
The broader political situation of the populace wanting increasingly expensive services but not being prepared to pay for them (via tax etc.) will clearly become unsustainable over time -if it hasn’t already. The point was widely explored by George Megalogenis on Insiders a day or so ago. See here:
http://www.abc.net.au/insiders/content/2012/s3591072.htm
The impact on e-Health is likely to be pretty large over time I suspect.
-----

E-health

A major focus of the Australian Government’s "eHealth" agenda is the personally controlled electronic health record system (PCEHR system).  On 1 July 2012 the PCEHR system became available for online registration for individuals.  The PCEHR system allows an individual to access their own health information and nominate which of their healthcare providers  obtain access to that information. 
An overview of the PCEHR system
The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records Act 2012 (Act) provides the legal framework for establishing a voluntary national system of internet-based personal medical records.  The aim of the PCEHR system is to improve the co-ordination of individuals' health information by making it more readily available and ensuring the most up to date information is used to assess the individuals' treatment.  In addition the PCEHR system aims to reduce the risk of adverse medical intervention or the duplication of treatment. 
-----

DORA software rollout lagging

13th Sep 2012
THE rollout of software giving GPs patient prescription histories in real time, aimed at cutting doctor shopping, is moving at a slow pace with bureaucratic hurdles delaying the process by months.
GPs had been expecting the software, known as DORA, to be made available nationwide from July following a successful trial overseen by Tasmania’s Alcohol and Drug Services.
The program was to be delivered by state governments with a $5 million contribution from the Commonwealth. But last week the federal health department confirmed licensing agreements with each state and territory were still being negotiated.
-----

E-health education program

10 September, 2012 Pharmacy News staff
A new national education program, funded through the Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement,will commence in October to support community pharmacies in increasing their understanding and awareness of electronic transfer of prescriptions.
The Electronic Transfer of Prescription (ETP) Education Program aims to educate the community pharmacy workforce about electronic medication management, and specifically the role of ETP in Australia’s e-health landscape.
ETP is a means by which community pharmacy can participate in a quality use of medicines initiative that will reduce medication errors and enhance health outcomes for consumers. In addition ETP will enable community pharmacy to reinforce its record as leaders in health-related innovation.
-----

ACT Launches Online Medical Information Pilot Project

In order to provide easy availability of medical facilities to Canberra residents, the ACT has come up with a scheme in which they will be providing online access to health information. In order to see the success of the project, the ACT has launched the scheme in the form of a pilot project, which will be combined with the PCEHR.
The system is known as My eHealth system and will allow users to have a look at their medical reports. Not only this, it will also allow users to manage their profiles as well medical appointments. The system is based on the Orion Health's consumer portal technology.

ACT pilots e-health records portal

Patients to register separately for PCEHR.

The ACT Government is trialling a new health information portal designed to deliver personal health information to consumers securely.
Health minister Katy Gallagher launched the 'My eHealth' portal this week with a pilot group of consumers from the Health Care Consumers Association and 40 chronic care patients.
The portal was designed to complement and integrate with the national Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system.
-----

Health budget slashed by $3b

Date September 14, 2012 - 9:35AM

Sean Nicholls

Sydney Morning Herald State Political Editor

Thousands of jobs may be axed from the NSW health service as part of deep budget cuts confirmed by the NSW Health Minister, Jillian Skinner.
Just days after the Education Minister, Adrian Piccoli, announced a $1.7 billion funding cut in his department, Mrs Skinner confirmed this morning that $3 billion will be cut from NSW health over the next four years.
This includes $775 million from the imposition of a "labour expense cap" announced for every government department in this year's budget.
-----

NSW Health cuts deeper into staff costs

NSW Minister for Health Jillian Skinner has confirmed the government’s healthcare reforms will require its local health districts (LHDs) to cut $775 million in staffing costs over four years.
The announcement is the latest in a series of changes targeted at reducing NSW Health’s head office, administration and management expenses by 25 percent.
The minister explained in a statement LHDs can choose how the savings will be achieved and suggested telehealth and other ehealth technologies may deliver efficiencies.
-----

Can we talk? Elderly needs drive face of future conversation

MEET the new face of human interaction: Telenoid the robot.
He's small, white and bears an eerie resemblance to Casper the Friendly Ghost but his creator, artist and academic Hiroshi Ishiguro, says soon he will be in every household and nursing home.
Ishiguro and his robotic friend are visiting Melbourne as part of RMIT Gallery's Experimenta -- 'Speak To Me' exhibition, featuring works from 30 international and Australian artists as part of the 5th International Biennial of Media Art.
Ishiguro's robot is -- basically speaking -- Android-Skype.
-----

Passwords could be replaced with the wave of your hand

Date September 14, 2012

Noel Randewich

Prepare for your print to be your password

From the developers forum in California, Intel shows how palm recognition technology can work in practice.
Passwords for online banking, social networks and email could be replaced with the wave of a hand if prototype technology developed by Intel makes it to tablets and laptops.
Aiming to do away with the need to remember passwords for growing numbers of online services, Intel researchers have put together a tablet with new software and a biometric sensor that recognises the unique patterns of veins on a person's palm.
-----

Bad medicine takes toll on Australians

  • Lisa Cornish and Sue Dunlevy
  • News Limited Network
  • September 15, 2012 12:04AM
THE top ten drugs used by Australians were linked to 2925 adverse events and 67 deaths in the last five years, an exclusive analysis of the adverse events data base of the national drug watchdog has found.
Information provided by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, collected from patients, consumers, health professionals and sponsors of medicines, reveal the risks Australians are exposed to on a daily basis.
Women are slightly  more prone than men to adverse effects, and the elderly are involved in more than 60 per cent of recorded cases.
-----

FHIR Report from Baltimore Meeting

Posted on September 14, 2012 by Grahame Grieve
Well, the Baltimore HL7 Working Group Meeting has (finally) come to end. It’s been an extremely busy meeting, and HL7 is certainly facing some new and difficult challenges in the near future.
Now that it’s over, here’s my FHIR progress report.
Ballot
Prior to the meeting, we held a draft for comment ballot. Combined with the issues list from the connectathon, and a few other late submissions, we around 130 issues on the list. These range from questions about the scope of FHIR write down to typographical errors. I thank everyone who contributed to this list greatly – it will help us improve the quality of the specification greatly. I hope that we can get all the issues resolved to everyone’s satisfaction prior to the release of the next ballot.
-----

Astounding CT scan tech takes a quantum leap inside the human body

Summary: Astounding CT scan tech makes possible to scan the human body quickly, constructing Star Trek-like, 3D images of the inner workings of a living patient's body.
By Denise Amrich for ZDNet Health | September 10, 2012 -- 01:52 GMT (11:52 AEST)
Scott Bakula is one of my favorite actors, mostly because of the parts he's played. He's taken a Quantum Leap back in time, and gone years into the future as the first captain of the Enterprise.
But another Bakula, Robert Bakula, is an elderly patient who's taking a quantum leap of his own. A guy who was born in the last century is being treated with technology that seems transported from the future.
-----

Get with digital 'or risk disaster'

A LARGE portion of Australia's $1.4 trillion economy faces severe, near-term disruptions due to the rise of the digital era, economics consultants Deloitte Access Economics says.
Business sectors representing up to a third of the economy are on course for major revenue disruptions within the next few years, the company says in a report released yesterday.
Finance, retail and media were singled out as the sectors facing the most severe short-term impact -- what Deloitte calls "short fuse, big bang".
It predicts that the three sectors could lose more than 35 per cent of their revenue within the next two years.
-----

Digital disruption: it’s not about to stop

Negar Salek
11/09/2012
Australian companies have between two and five years to master the onset of digital disruption if they are to avoid the troubles that have rocked the retail and media industries, a Deloitte report has found.
Education, government services, agriculture, health, transport, and utilities are expected to suffer significant disruption to their business models, the report states, but over a longer time frame than their counterparts in information technology, finance, and retail, which face a more imminent threat.
Miners, construction groups and many manufacturers have longer to prepare and face less incremental disruption. Education and health are also expected to have more time to plan their responses.
-----

The Australian Law Council says Labor's data retention plans go too far

FEDERAL government plans to make telcos store records of their customers' internet habits for two years would breach Australian cultural boundaries, the Law Council says.
Speaking on behalf of the council at a Senate committee hearing on the proposed laws today, Philip Bolton SC said the proposed laws were out of proportion to problems faced by law enforcement agencies.
He also criticised what he saw as a lack transparency on the part of the government regarding the new laws at the hearing.
The proposed package of laws are designed to address serious law enforcement challenges created by internet-based communications and require major reforms to Australia's telecommunications interception and intelligence legislation.
-----

Curiosity ready to roll again

  • From: AP
  • September 13, 2012 12:38PM
THE Mars rover Curiosity is preparing to roll again after it completes its health checkups, project managers say.
Since landing in an ancient crater near the Martian equator on August 5, the car-size rover has trekked more than the length of a football field, leaving wheel tracks in the soil.
The most high-tech rover sent to the red planet, it spent the past month testing its instruments before embarking on a mission to examine whether the environment could have been hospitable to microbial life.
Mission manager Jennifer Trosper said the six-wheel Curiosity has "performed almost flawlessly" so far.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Monday, September 17, 2012

A Totally Unrealistic Email Came Out from NEHTA Last Week. I Will Be Amazed If All This Actually Happens!

This little ripper was circulated last week.
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:23 PM
Subject: PIP eHealth Incentive - Pre-release webinar for the Medical Software Vendor Community - Slide pack
Dear all,
Thank you for joining our Practice Incentives Program eHealth Incentive - Pre-release webinar for the Medical Software Vendor Community.
The slide pack from yesterday’s discussion is enclosed for your review and distribution as appropriate. Please note that this document will also be posted on the NEHTA website.
As a recap, the key messages are:
-      The PIP eHealth incentive, announced in the 2012-13 budget, aims to encourage general practices to keep up to date with the latest developments in eHealth
-      The five requirements and associated compliance dates are:
o   1. Integrating Healthcare Identifiers into Electronic Practice Records - February 2013
o   2. Secure Messaging Capability - February 2013
o   3. Data Records and Clinical Coding - February 2013
o   4. Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions - February 2013
o   5. Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records - May 2013
-    The PIP eHealth Product Register is intended for Practices to check if they have compliant software
-    More information will follow shortly on how vendors can list their products on the PIP eHealth Product Register. In the meantime we encourage you to peruse the information enclosed in the slide pack.
Please do not hesitate to contact Industry@nehta.gov.au if you require further assistance.
Thank you.
NEHTA Industry Communications
----- End E-Mail.
So what we have from those people who could not deliver the National Authentication System for Health after 5 years of trying demands that - for apparently no money - suddenly all this NEHTA compliance is to appear out of thin air is slightly over six months.
Of course we know the IHI service is hardly fit for purpose and that no-one is relying on it as the sole identifier.
More amazing still there are no standards for Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions so the vendor systems has to be able to use a commercial non-NEHTA non-standard compliant provider!
Equally it is totally unclear just what coding is to be used - and on the relevant slide SNOMED is not even mentioned.
I have no idea how all this is going to play out but my suggestion would be for the system providers to say to the GPs who want to claim the very substantial payments (up to $50,000 per practice) for software compliance that the costs of our software will be ½ of the PIP payment you can claim until such time as our development costs are re-couped.
I can’t see anywhere where the same demands for compliance are being placed on the State Jurisdictions for their computer systems - or have I missed the announcement.
You can download the amazing document from here:
The NEHRS can be months late but it seems the private sector has to fit in with nonsense deadlines and work through the holiday period in January to boot.
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 136 – Results – 17th September, 2012.

The question was:

Do You Think The Unreliability and Instability of The NEHRS Should Result In Sanctions Against Those Responsible?

For Sure 69% (29)
Probably 10% (4)
Possibly 10% (4)
No Way - They Are Trying Hard 12% (5)
Total votes: 42
Very interesting response. Essentially about 70% there should be some accountability for the way the NEHRS project has been made operational ?
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Here Is The Sort Of Thing That Makes Medicare Dispensing Information Pretty Useless Clinically.

Here is a little story which has both good news and the opposite.
First the good news is that when I made my weekly visit to the NEHRS the system was actually up and apparently working. It all seemed to working just ‘tickety boo’ but is, as always pretty slow and tedious.
However there are two issues I noticed, one of which dramatically decreases the value of the system from a clinical perspective.
Looking at my medication record I found these two entries (out of a total of 9 entries from 3 prescriptions - one of which is wrongly allocated to myself rather than my wife.)
First we have this:
Generic Name: OMEPRAZOLE
Brand:  OMEPRAZOLE GENERICHEALTH
Prescribed:  30-Jun-2012
Supplied:  01-Jul-2012
Form & Strength:  TABLET 20MG
Code:  08333N
Second we have this record.
Generic Name:  OMEPRAZOLE
Brand: ACIMAX TABLETS
Prescribed:  05-May-2012
Supplied:  06-May-2012
Form & Strength: TABLET 20MG (AS MAGNESIUM)
Code:  09110L
(Note I have left out the quantity and repeats fields as they are identical)
The point to observe here is that an identical (generically substitutable) medication finds itself with two different codes which I can find no relationship between. These are the same generic medicine and should have exactly the same code if there was any clinical common sense applied to the coding. Indeed it is quite probable the medications are simply different packages of tablets manufactured by the same pharmaceutical major (Astra Zeneca).
What this means is that the coding system used by Medicare is essentially useless for clinical research and clinical decision support as it is not apparent that each is the same medicine. If any medication coding and history is to be useful the functionally and chemically identical same medications need to have the same code - it is as simple as that.
The problem is of course, that the designers of the Medicare system were concerned with bean counting and not clinical utility. Using information which might be fit for one purpose for another purpose is always fraught with risk.
Less important is that the system is clearly the designed for those with 20/20 vision. While the print button is hard to see - the search and restriction functionality on the top left is even more obscure. Hard to know what the tiny symbols mean until you click them. To me the system needs much larger controls on the screen and it needs a clear warning to users to read the ‘help’ carefully. I have not seen such a warning and it would be really sensible to have it up in big clear type - or to send users here to browse:
It all seems to be there - it just needs highlighting.
Extremely disappointingly the search function does not look into document content - just the document type so you can’t search for all instances of ‘omeprazole’ for example. As the record acquires more records I suspect this search will be less than very useful.
As far as the drug coding is concerned this really is a shame that in even in the tiny sample I can see such silliness has been allowed.
David.