Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 17th November, 2012.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

EHR incentive payments top $8B in October

By Mary Mosquera, Contributing Editor
Created 11/09/2012
WASHINGTON – Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record payments have surpassed $8 billion since its inception, with $8.36 billion paid out to 165,800 eligible physicians and hospitals in total program estimates through the end of October.
Final figures will be available later this month as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services captures more complete data.
During October, CMS estimated that it paid Medicare eligible physicians and hospitals $435 million and Medicaid physicians and hospitals $210 million, for a total of $645 million, according to Robert Anthony, a specialist in CMS’ Office of eHealth Standards and Services. Hospitals accounted for $480 million.
-----

AMIA studies show iPad remains popular with docs but imperfect

By: Neil Versel | Nov 8, 2012   
The iPad continues to be a hugely popular but imperfect tool for physicians, as suggested by two papers presented Monday at the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) annual symposium in Chicago.
In two Fairview Health Services emergency departments in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, physicians actually told IT leadership prior to the December 2010 go-live of an electronic medical record that they would not use the EMR unless they could access the new system on iPads. This “unique and interesting phenomenon,” as one of the newly published papers put it, prompted University of Minnesota researchers to explore why.
-----

Healthcare Experts Balance Patient-Reported Data Promise, Problems

Patient questionnaires can detect problems clinicians miss, but it's still hard to integrate the data into electronic health records systems, say American Medical Informatics Association conference panelists.
Several major academic medical centers have been fairly successful collecting electronic patient-reported data to help manage care and improve outcomes, but they still struggle to integrate the information with clinical information systems and physician workflow.
Such data can automate patient check in, assist with triage, lessen waiting time and get at health issues that might otherwise have gone unnoticed, presenters at the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) annual symposium said Sunday in Chicago. "The patient is the gold standard for reporting," said Dr. Deborah Miller, a social worker in the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research at the Cleveland Clinic, who moderated the session. AdTech Ad
-----

How Health IT Benefits From Obama's Re-election

The fed's health IT incentive program will continue, along with related programs, but one prominent analyst suggests the biggest threat to the EHR incentive program now is the 'fiscal cliff.'
The day after President Obama was re-elected and Democrats held onto control of the U.S. Senate, the future looked bright to folks in the health IT field.
The election outcome suggested that attacks on the government's electronic health record incentive program by Congressional Republicans may lose steam or disappear altogether. Coincidentally, the Health IT Policy Committee met on Oct. 7 to discuss a draft of its Meaningful Use Stage 3 recommendations. AdTech Ad
Robin Raiford, research director for the Meaningful Use practice of the Advisory Board Co., a healthcare consulting firm, listened in on the committee meeting, which was chaired by Farzad Mostashari, national coordinator of health IT. The tenor of the discussion, she told Information Week Healthcare, was that the committee would "move forward and finish the work that's been started."
-----

EHR costs, woes continue to plague practices

November 6, 2012 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Physicians are leaving private practice and seeking employment in large part due to the government's electronic health record requirements and related costs, which increase the overall cost of running a practice, according to a new report published by Accenture.
A majority of physicians surveyed (53 percent) specifically cited the EHR mandate as a primary reason for leaving private practice; 87 percent said that the overall cost and expense of running a business was the main concern influencing their decision to seek hospital employment instead.
-----

PHR adoption hinges primarily on ease of use, value to consumers

November 7, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
Ease of use and the perceived advantage of logging on to personal health records were the leading factors to PHR adoption according to researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, who published their findings this week in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
The study also looked at sociodemographic characteristics, access and use of technology, perceived innovativeness with technology, and perceptions of privacy and security.
In the study, 760 surveyed patients from the ambulatory care practices of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital were identified in three groups: PHR users; rejecters--those who never logged on; and non-adopters--those who initially logged on, but never used the PHR.
-----

5 steps to a mobile practice

By Benjamin Harris, New Media Producer
Created 11/07/2012
Moving from a desktop computer to an iPhone may seem like second nature to some – or like being attached to a ball and chain to others. As healthcare practices adopt and require mobile-based apps for their EMRs and other services, providers may find that they have little choice but to quit worrying and learn to love their mobile devices.
Brad Jannenga, CEO of WebPT, develops specialized software for physical therapy practices and entered the healthcare industry specifically because of a lack of good mobile based applications.
"In the medical space there's kind of a dichotomy," says Jannenga, who points out that incredibly advanced life-saving and life-sustaining technology has been developed that can "fit inside a briefcase." But "the software they're using to manage their practice" is so outdated that he likens it to the old green text on a black screen of the early command line based systems.
-----

AMIA: Why interoperability is 'taking so darn long'

By Neil Versel, Contributing Writer
Created 11/08/2012
CHICAGO – Hospitals can have hundreds of IT systems. Vendors have built proprietary databases. Not everyone follows the same standards. Health systems fear sharing data with competitors. Policymakers have not focused on health information exchange or EHR usability.
These are just a few of the reasons why true interoperability of health information remains so elusive, according to a panel of informatics luminaries.
"Technology is only one obstacle to interoperability," said Gilad Kuperman, MD, director of interoperability informatics at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, who moderated the panel at the just-concluded American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium about why interoperability is "taking so darn long.
-----

Gwynne admits NPfIT mistakes

7 November 2012   Lis Evenstad
Shadow health minister Andrew Gwynne came as close as any politician is likely to do for apologising for the National Programme for IT in the NHS this morning.
Speaking at EHI Live 2012, he said he realised Labour had failed with NPfIT, which had not worked out as planned.
“I think we’ve acknowledged that we made mistakes and there were problems with that IT system,” he told one of the first sessions of the second day of the event in Birmingham.
He added that government IT systems “tended to be over budget and not work the way they intended to”, but Labour could learn from its mistakes.
-----

'Lung-on-a-chip' offers insight into treatment of deadly disease

November 8, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
"Lung-on-a-chip" technology can mimic the life-threatening condition pulmonary edema and holds the potential to become an alternative to animal testing for drug toxicity, according to a new study in Science Translation Medicine.
Researchers at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University introduced organ-mimicking chips two years ago, including the lung, heart, kidney and gut. A video of the "lung-on-a-chip" explains that within the thumb-sized device, a thin, porous membrane divides the space, with human lung cells exposed to air on one side and human capillary blood cells lining the other, with a medium flowing over them containing white blood cells. Vacuum chambers on the sides mimic the rhythmic expansion and contraction that occurs with breathing.
----

One-stop shop for disease genes

NIH database integrates data from clinical genetic testing labs and literature.
07 November 2012
When Heidi Rehm surveys a patient’s genes and finds a variant she’s never seen before, she improvises. First Rehm, who directs a clinical genetics testing laboratory at Partners HealthCare in Cambridge, Massachusetts, checks through as many as ten databases to learn whether that variant has ever been associated with disease. Then she may ask colleagues at other clinical sequencing laboratories whether they have seen it. But the launch this week of a database known as ClinVar will make her job much easier — and allow her to ask more sophisticated questions.
Developed by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) in Bethesda, Maryland, ClinVar integrates dozens of existing databases. It also provides, for the first time, a central place in which clinical testing laboratories can deposit their data, because most currently keep their data within the laboratory. By aggregating such information, ClinVar’s creators hope to accelerate clinicians’ understanding of the effects of variants as well as reveal whether different laboratories are interpreting the same variant in different ways.
-----

Mostashari: Obama re-election points to critical role of data

By Mary Mosquera
Farzad Mostashari, MD, the national health IT coordinator, said that data and analytics played a critical role in the campaign and re-election of President Barack Obama – mirroring the growing importance of data in healthcare.  
Data and analytics have transformed marketing, campaigning, and even baseball. “How is it possible for us to imagine a world where that power of data is not brought to bear on life and death, clinical care, on population health, and affirming the path that we are on with health IT and bringing data to life?” Mostashari said in comments about his thoughts the morning after the election at the Nov. 7 meeting of the federal advisory Health IT Policy Committee.
-----

Top 10 Healthcare IT Hazards

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , November 7, 2012

Healthcare leaders should be on special alert for three serious hazards that increasingly threaten both patients and providers with harm, says the ECRI Institute's Top 10 Health Technology Hazards report for 2013.
The three hazards involve electronic health records, health information technology systems, and cell phones and other mobile devices, which can distract healthcare providers from the focus they need for tasks at hand many times an hour.
As healthcare organizations gain experience with IT systems, they’re encountering ways in which technology can introduce mistakes with far-reaching consequences.  For example, simple errors may result in one patient's test results or prescription orders finding their way into another patient's medical record.
-----

Electronic Health Records and National Patient-Safety Goals

Dean F. Sittig, Ph.D., and Hardeep Singh, M.D., M.P.H.
N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1854-1860
November 8, 2012DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1205420
Electronic health records (EHRs) are essential to improving patient safety.1 Hospitals and health care providers are implementing EHRs rapidly in response to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 2-4 The number of certified EHR vendors in the United States has increased from 60 5,6 to more than 10007 since mid-2008. Recent evidence has highlighted substantial and often unexpected risks resulting from the use of EHRs and other forms of health information technology. 8-12 These concerns are compounded by the extraordinary pace of EHR development and implementation. Thus, the unique safety risks posed by the use of EHRs should be considered alongside the potential benefits of these systems.
-----

National Health Information Exchange: Why The Delay?

Hurricane Sandy took many lives and caused billions of dollars in damage. But so does a healthcare system that still refuses to embrace interoperability.
There's nothing like a common enemy or problem to bring people together. In the days since Hurricane Sandy, we've witnessed countless acts of heroism and generosity in the face of destruction and despair. It's a pity Americans can't bring that same sense of common purpose to health information exchanges.
Many would argue that the immediate threat and aftermath of a storm far outweigh the negative consequences of a poor system for sharing patient data. But that's an illusion. Some 50 people died in Hurricane Sandy, but more patients die each day as a result of poor communication among clinicians and inadequate exchange of data during transitions from hospitals to nursing homes and rehab facilities. AdTech Ad
-----

4 Stories About Social Media's Awesome Power

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , November 6, 2012

When a CIO I spoke with recently stated that Twitter scared him, I doubled my efforts to seek out a good story about use of social media by a healthcare provider. Within a couple of weeks, I found four.
Timimi, a cardiologist and the medical director for the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media, uses social media strategically.  Speaking at the annual meeting of the Association of American Medical Colleges in San Francisco, Farris Timimi, MD, he made those strategies come alive.
The first story involved Philip R. Fischer, MD, a Mayo physician and expert on Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS). Fischer's administrative partner, Lee Aase, made a 22-minute video of Fischer speaking about POTS.
-----

Clinical decision support helps to curb inappropriate prescribing

November 7, 2012 | By Dan Bowman
Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support system to prescribe antibiotics for patients suffering from acute respiratory infections helps to ensure the appropriateness of those prescriptions, a study recently published online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine concludes.
For the study, nine primary care practices within the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet)--a practice-based research organization based at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston--participated in a two-phase, 27-month long demonstration pilot in which the practices used a common EHR CDSS that targeted multiple factors. The researchers found that use of broad spectrum antibiotics for acute respiratory infections--sinusitis, in particular--declined by slightly more than 16 percent for both adults and children.
-----

Docs take mHealth baby steps, use tablets for the basics

By Eric Wicklund, Contributing Editor
Created 11/07/2012
Whether it's due to skepticism or a lack of resources, not all doctors are sold on the prospects of mHealth. But for those looking to stick their toe into the pool, tablets are finding widespread adoption as a good entry point for clinics and doctor's offices.
Recent surveys have indicated roughly 80 percent of doctors use mobile devices, and between 40 percent and 50 percent are using tablets. With new tablets coming out almost every week, and surveys indicating almost 80 percent of consumers want to see their doctors using mobile health solutions, clinicians are turning to tablets for that most basic of functions: Patient registration.
-----

Obama wins, but the future for ACA and HIT is still uncertain

By Tom Sullivan, Government Health IT
Created 11/07/2012
While many early accounts of last night’s party for President Obama hail the news as a boon for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), once that excitement wears off, Americans will realize that it's just too early to tell whether the reelection will actually be fertilizer or formaldehyde for health reform and for what to date has been viewed as bipartisan support for health IT.
Yes, the law remains just that: legislation that passed, survived a Supreme Court challenge and, as of today, is safe from GOP contender Mitt Romney’s campaign promises to repeal it entirely.
But there are still quite a few growing pains ahead for the ACA.
-----

Patients online drill deep for information on doctors, procedures

Physicians who don’t manage their online presence run the risk of failing to attract new patients.

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, amednews staff. Posted Nov. 5, 2012.
A majority of Americans looking up health information online are no longer merely researching symptoms. They are going online to determine which physicians to see, what treatment to get, and what services a hospital or pharmacy might provide — and using that information to drive their choices.
According to Manhattan Research, which surveyed 5,210 adults who use the Internet as a health resource, 54% of respondents said they did online research to decide what services they might need and who should provide them. Various surveys have said that roughly 75% of American adults search for health information online.
-----

Hospital CIOs on HIE, EHRs in storm Sandy

By Erin McCann, Contributing Editor
With the support of health information technology, astute preparation by staff and, yes, even a little good old-fashioned luck,some hospitals and health systems along Hurricane Sandy’s path emerged from the storm relatively unscathed.
Officials at Atlanticare, one of New Jersey’s largest healthcare systems, based in Galloway and Atlantic City, N.J., cite early preparation among IT and safety staff as key to surviving this kind of storm. 
“I had actually been tracking the weather the week prior,” Debra Fox, chief safety office at Atlanticare, tells Healthcare IT News. “Thursday is actually when we initiated our planning and communication to the leadership around beginning to put their operational preparedness plans in place,” she adds. This included topping off generator fuel and ensuring that the facility is able to withstand a loss of power.
-----

AMIA: Regenstrief pumps up its clinical decision support

By Neil Versel
Created 11/06/2012
CHICAGO – Regenstrief Institute was a pioneer in clinical decision support, but its system was aging. Most noticeably, the interface in its famed "Gopher" computerized physician order entry system looked the same in 2010 as it did in 1984.
After two years of redesign, the venerable Indianapolis institution unveiled an update last year with more than just a modern look, Regenstrief researchers pointed out Monday at the annual American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) symposium.
-----

Providers unhappy with HIE vendors' sharing capabilities

November 6, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
As interoperability issues persist in the health information exchange market, respondents in a new KLAS survey report dissatisfaction with their vendors.
"Building and supporting interfaces continues to be a big challenge for all vendors," report author Mark Allphin said in an announcement. "Providers expect their health information exchange vendor to be an expert in moving data between multiple EMRs--regardless of the complexities or costs."
-----

Health information errors cited among top 10 health IT hazards

November 6, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
Three of the 10 top health technology hazards cited in a report from ECRI Institute deal with errors in information management.
Making the list:
  • Patient/data mismatches in EHRs and other health IT systems, an issue on which the Bipartisan Policy Center issued a call to action in June.
  • Interoperability failures with medical devices and health IT systems.
  • Caregiver distractions from smartphones and other mobile devices.
"While many health IT implementations offer great promise for improving patient care, it must be recognized that these complex technologies also can create new paths to failure," the report states, urging healthcare facilities to pay particular attention to health IT when prioritizing their safety initiatives for 2013.
-----

HIT systems among top 10 health tech hazards, says ECRI

By Erin McCann, Associate Editor
Created 11/06/2012
PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA – Health IT may promise a new paradigm of patient care, but it's also fraught with complexity and the potential for error. A new report from ECRI Institute, which researches best practices to improve care delivery, outlines the top 10 health technology hazards for 2013, and health IT systems are disconcertingly close to the top.
ECRI's 6th annual “Top 10 Health Technology Hazards list” is designed to raise awareness of the potential dangers associated with the use of medical devices and systems. A popular roadmap for healthcare providers to prioritize their technology safety initiatives, the list features key topics that warrant particular attention for the coming year with actionable recommendations on addressing them.  
-----

Database Aims to Track Outcomes

By David Pittman, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: November 04, 2012
An international nonprofit is launching a publicly accessible database of medical registries it hopes will better track outcomes -- and through that improve quality -- for some of the most burdensome conditions.
The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) launched last month with more than 50 registries from 20-plus countries covering nearly two dozen conditions.
"What we're trying to do is enable best practices sharing by comparing outcomes for either diseases or procedures in a structured format," Peter Lawyer, senior partner and managing director with the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), told MedPage Today.
-----

Patient identification pitfalls plague HIE networks

Author Name Jennifer Bresnick   |   Date November 5, 2012  
Managing patient identities is one of the hidden problems of health information exchange (HIE) and electronic health record (EHR) technology.  While every patient needs a single, unique identifier tied to his medical records and billing information, a simple typo or a misspoken birthday can leave a patient with duplicate records, potentially compromising his care.  Many hospitals use their own master patient indexes (MPIs) to check if patients have an existing record, but the emergence of HIE means new challenges in ensuring accuracy across multiple providers for millions of new patients.
Beth Just, MBA, RHIA, FHIMA, and president and CEO of Just Associates, Inc., tells For the Record that an MPI involves “all of the patient’s identifying information, such as names, birth dates, Social Security numbers, addresses, and phone numbers, [being] stored in a central data table.”  But unique identifiers must be the same across the entire HIE for the network to function, which can be accomplished with the help of a system-wide enterprise MPI (EMPI).  An EMPI provides its own identifier that spans the entire network, requiring accurate and complete data across every department or healthcare provider contributing to a patient’s care.
-----
Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Leveraging Emerging Technologies for Improved Patient Engagement and Safety

A couple of months ago, I completed a master trainer course offered by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on TeamSTEPPS, a set of evidence-based strategies and tools to enhance team performance and patient safety. Information sharing and communication are key principles of the program. Since the training, I have thought about opportunities to leverage emerging technologies, including interactive websites, social media, Web-based video conferencing, mobile and more into health care.
About TeamSTEPPS
TeamSTEPPS promotes techniques that create highly effective medical teams that optimize the use of information, people and resources to achieve the best clinical outcomes for patients and eliminate barriers to safety. These techniques include Briefs, Huddles and Debriefs, Check-backs or Teach-backs, Feedback, Advocacy and Assertion and SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation). While the system originally was focused on the professional care team, the techniques also can be applied to communications and engagement of patients and family caregivers; especially during transitions in care.
-----

Direct messaging capabilities come to 6 state HIEs

By Mike Miliard, Managing Editor
Created 11/05/2012
NASHVILLE, TN – ICA, which develops interoperability technology for health information exchange (HIE), announced that it will provide Direct capabilities to clients in six states through its CareAlign Direct messaging tool.
More than 4,000 providers are now taking advantage of Direct technology, via HIEs including Central Illinois Health Information Exchange, Iowa Health Information Network, Kansas Health Information Network, Upper Peninsula Health Information Exchange, New Jersey's Meridian Health Systems and Pennsylvania's Allied Health Information Exchange.
-----

Computational models increasingly improving research, healthcare quality

November 5, 2012 | By Dan Bowman
Computational models are increasingly helping healthcare researchers to understand how to both identify and treat complex diseases, according to a recent article published by four Johns Hopkins professors in the journal Science Translational Medicine. The professors cite several examples of how computational models have improved research efforts for diseases such as Alzheimer's, as well as how they are being used for preventive care.
"The field has exploded. There is a whole new community of people being trained in mathematics, computer science and engineering, and they are being cross-trained in biology," Raimond Winslow, director of the school's Institute for Computational Medicine and co-author of the article, said in a statement.
-----

Predictive modeling shapes the future at Boston Children's

November 5, 2012 | By Dan Bowman
Hospitals nationwide are turning to informatics to streamline care processes, improving both the efficiency and safety of patient care. One facility that appears to be ahead of the curve, however, is Children's Hospital Boston, which, according to CIO Dan Nigrin saves roughly $1.4 million annually by using informatics in its medication delivery system.
"The pharmacy is made aware of changes much more expeditiously than when we were paper based," Nigrin told FierceHealthIT in an exclusive interview. "The pharmacy has gotten to essentially be much more of a just-in-time delivery model, where they're continuously delivering medications to the floor, every hour or every two hours, as opposed to every 12. If a medication has changed, the amount of potential waste that occurs because the medication was, for instance, discontinued, has dropped dramatically."
-----

Health IT group praises senator's cybersecurity effort

Posted: November 1, 2012 - 2:00 pm ET
The Health Information Trust Alliance offered its support for an effort by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) to raise awareness of what both call a growing cybersecurity threat.
In a three-page letter to Rockefeller, HITrust CEO Daniel Nutkis said the organization "applauds lawmakers' and regulators' attention to this issue and is supportive of anything that protects national critical infrastructure and avoids disruptions or losses that can be caused by cyberattacks."
Thus, HITrust backs Rockefeller's call for the business community to work with government to address the issue, with the caveat that lawmakers and government officials take into account the public-private collaborations already in place, "learn from what is working, and minimize new burdensome assessments and audits that will divert resources from the real task of enhancing cyber threat detection and response capabilities."
-----

How to secure patient trust in electronic record systems

A breach of personal data could do considerable damage, so trusts must build patient privacy into NHS IT systems
Electronic record systems are among the most important healthcare advances of our times.
They bring better, more sustainable healthcare and offer the NHS the opportunity to make large savings – allowing more public money to be invested in improving patient outcomes.
However, a recent survey of more than 1,000 UK citizens revealed that 86.5% of respondents believed a serious breach of personal data would do considerable damage to a hospital's reputation, while 87.2% thought the NHS should monitor who looks at their patient records.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, November 16, 2012

This Sounds Like Some Important Work In Clinical Decision Support. We Need To Encourage Work Like This.

The following appeared a few days ago:

AMIA: Regenstrief pumps up its clinical decision support

By Neil Versel
Created 11/06/2012
CHICAGO – Regenstrief Institute was a pioneer in clinical decision support, but its system was aging. Most noticeably, the interface in its famed "Gopher" computerized physician order entry system looked the same in 2010 as it did in 1984.
After two years of redesign, the venerable Indianapolis institution unveiled an update last year with more than just a modern look, Regenstrief researchers pointed out Monday at the annual American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) symposium.
The new Gopher features a graphical user interface that looks like a single, integrated system, but the complex display is generated from multiple layers and plug-ins, research scientist Jon Duke, MD, said. More importantly, it supports a new, multifaceted approach to clinical decision support, featuring order entry, research and results viewing capabilities.
"We recognized that improving quality of care was a priority," Duke explained. "We wanted to promote provider efficiency."
Duke and two Regenstrief colleagues touted five advances in clinical decision support the new Gopher provides over the original:
  • Dynamic alerting, or the mechanics to change alerts based on clinical relevance to a specific patient's needs. Programmers built in 10 theoretical alerting levels, though Duke said the informatics team decided to activate four alerting zones on the screen for now. "Every alert in our system … had a baseline relevance level which determines its display location," Duke said.
Read about the other 4 improvements here:
Smart people these. Make the underlying system smarter while not disturbing the users by making things look different.
Again, of course, we need this in our clinician systems. The lack of such capabilities just makes the spending of money on the NEHRS even sillier than it already was.
David.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

More Research On Adoption and Use Of Personal Health Records. Clear Implications For The NEHRS.

The following appeared a little while ago.

PHR adoption hinges primarily on ease of use, value to consumers

November 7, 2012 | By Susan D. Hall
Ease of use and the perceived advantage of logging on to personal health records were the leading factors to PHR adoption according to researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, who published their findings this week in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
The study also looked at sociodemographic characteristics, access and use of technology, perceived innovativeness with technology, and perceptions of privacy and security.
In the study, 760 surveyed patients from the ambulatory care practices of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital were identified in three groups: PHR users; rejecters--those who never logged on; and non-adopters--those who initially logged on, but never used the PHR.
Non-adopters reported lower rates of computer use than PHR users and rejecters. Not too surprisingly, PHR users scored the ease of use and relative advantage of the PHR higher than rejecters and non-adopters.
The work contrasts to a recent study published by researchers from the University of Central Florida which found no link between age, income and education in willingness to adopt a PHR. That study focused only on intent to adopt a PHR, not whether patients actually adopted the technology.
More here:
Here is the abstract:

Patient Perceptions of a Personal Health Record: A Test of the Diffusion of Innovation Model

Srinivas Emani1*, PhD, MA; Cyrus K Yamin2*, MD; Ellen Peters3*, PhD; Andrew S Karson4*, MD, MPH; Stuart R Lipsitz1*, ScD; Jonathan S Wald5*, MD, MPH; Deborah H Williams1*, MHA; David W Bates1,6*, MD, MSc

ABSTRACT

Background: Personal health records (PHRs) have emerged as an important tool with which patients can electronically communicate with their doctors and doctor’s offices. However, there is a lack of theoretical and empirical research on how patients perceive the PHR and the differences in perceptions between users and non-users of the PHR.
Objective: To apply a theoretical model, the diffusion of innovation model, to the study of PHRs and conduct an exploratory empirical study on the applicability of the model to the study of perceptions of PHRs. A secondary objective was to assess whether perceptions of PHRs predict the perceived value of the PHR for communicating with the doctor’s office.
Methods: We first developed a survey capturing perceptions of PHR use and other factors such as sociodemographic characteristics, access and use of technology, perceived innovativeness in the domain of information technology, and perceptions of privacy and security. We then conducted a cross-sectional survey (N = 1500). Patients were grouped into five groups of 300: PHR users (innovators, other users, and laggards), rejecters, and non-adopters. We applied univariate statistical analysis (Pearson chi-square and one-way ANOVA) to assess differences among groups and used multivariate statistical techniques (factor analysis and multiple regression analysis) to assess the presence of factors identified by the diffusion of innovation model and the predictors of our dependent variable (value of PHR for communicating with the doctor’s office).
Results: Of the 1500 surveys, 760 surveys were returned for an overall response rate of 51%. Computer use among non-adopters (75%) was lower than that among PHR users (99%) and rejecters (92%) (P < .001). Non-adopters also reported a lower score on personal innovativeness in information technology (mean = 2.8) compared to 3.6 and 3.1, respectively, for users and rejecters (P < .001). Four factors identified by the diffusion of innovation model emerged in the factor analysis: ease of use, relative advantage, observability, and trialability. PHR users perceived greater ease of use and relative advantage of the PHR than rejecters and non-adopters (P<.001). Multiple regression analysis showed the following factors as significant positive predictors of the value of PHR for communicating with the doctor’s office: relative advantage, ease of use, trialability, perceptions of privacy and security, age, and computer use.
Conclusion: Our study found that the diffusion of innovation model fits the study of perceptions of the PHR and provides a suitable theoretical and empirical framework to identify the factors that distinguish PHR users from non-users. The ease of use and relative advantage offered by the PHR emerged as the most important domains among perceptions of PHR use and in predicting the value of the PHR. Efforts to improve uptake and use of PHRs should focus on strategies that enhance the ease of use of PHRs and that highlight the relative advantages of PHRs.
(J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e150)
doi:10.2196/jmir.2278
The full paper is found here:
This is another paper DoHA / NEHTA need to look at carefully. Note three things.
1. The digital divide seems to be pretty important.
2. Usage seems to need the capacity to communicate with the doctor’s office - which the NEHRS does not facilitate.
3. Ease of use matters!
4. Providing real and perceived value to consumers matters!
Well worth a close look.
David.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Does Anyone Know Just How Secure Our Electronic Patient Records Are? Anyone Have Some Numbers?

The following article appeared in the UK Guardian a few days ago.

How to secure patient trust in electronic record systems

A breach of personal data could do considerable damage, so trusts must build patient privacy into NHS IT systems
Electronic records can improve outcomes for patients, but patients should be able to trust that their information is secure. Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian
Electronic record systems are among the most important healthcare advances of our times.
They bring better, more sustainable healthcare and offer the NHS the opportunity to make large savings – allowing more public money to be invested in improving patient outcomes.
However, a recent survey of more than 1,000 UK citizens revealed that 86.5% of respondents believed a serious breach of personal data would do considerable damage to a hospital's reputation, while 87.2% thought the NHS should monitor who looks at their patient records.
Despite this, many NHS hospitals do not have systems in place to proactively detect privacy violation – and remain vulnerable to breaches, litigation and regulator fines.
Until it becomes mandatory for trusts to build patient privacy into NHS IT systems, the risk of major data breaches will remain, and patients will not fully realise the benefits of electronic healthcare systems.

Disclosure and notification

Recent data from the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) reveals that data security breaches within the NHS have increased by 935% in the past five years. Yet there remains no legal requirement in the UK for providers to disclose to the patient when a privacy breach has taken place.
This must be addressed. UK citizens have a basic right to know when their records have been inappropriately accessed and their privacy compromised.
When a breach has occurred, providers must be mandated to disclose this to patients, and notify the ICO. This would bring a level of accountability to care providers that cannot be achieved by other measures such as random audits and fines.
Healthcare privacy laws in the rest of the world are being significantly strengthened – and the NHS cannot afford to be left behind. In the US, Arra Hitech privacy legislation (2009) introduced – and enforced – strict guidelines around breach disclosure and notification.
Similarly, in Europe, pending legislation in the General Data Protection Regulation will mandate the disclosure and notification of privacy breaches to individual patients and governmental organisations respectively. The NHS should rigorously enforce this legislation.
Lots more here:
Does anyone know of comparable statistics for Australia?
Second question - if we don’t know just why might that be?
Sadly I am an answer free zone - but I really feel we should know!
David.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The E-Prescribing Saga Is Just Going On And On. Will It Ever Be Sorted?

As followers of the evolving ePIP requirements for receipt of the Government e-Health Incentives will be aware there are 5 different capabilities a fully compliant system has to deliver for the clinician.
Here is a broad outline of the aspects covered:

eHealth Incentive Introduction

The eHealth incentive aims to encourage general practices to keep up to date with the latest developments in eHealth to assist in improving administration processes and enhancing the quality of patient care by, for example, by supporting the capacity to share accurate electronic patient records.
The Australian Government announced as part of the 2012-13 Budget that new PIP eHealth Incentive requirements had been developed in order to support the delivery of current eHealth initiatives particularly the personally controlled electronic health (eHealth) records system.
The new requirements and associated dates are:
Integrating Healthcare Identifiers into Electronic Practice Records
1 February 2013
Secure Messaging
1 February 2013
Data Records and Clinical Coding
1 February 2013
Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions
1 February 2013
PCEHR
1 May 2013
The site is found here:
What is of interest today is e-prescribing - noting that this has to be in place in less than three months.

Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions

The practice software system must be able to send an electronic prescription to a Prescription Exchange Service (PES) operator for later retrieval by a dispenser at the time of dispensing.
Oddly there are no conformance requirements:
“The practice software system must be able to send an electronic prescription to a Prescription Exchange Service (PES) operator for later retrieval by a dispenser at the time of dispensing.
There are no current CCA software conformance requirements for practice systems for the Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions (ETP).
If your software product is able to send an electronic prescription to a PES operator you can complete the Declaration of Conformity form and request to be recorded in the PIP eHealth Product Register using the Registration page.”
As of 11/11/2012 there are 2 private (and presently non-interoperable) prescription exchanges operating (MediSecure and eRx) and no standards finalised on ETP.
You can read about what is expected here:
You can read all about the exchanges here:
and here:
Interestingly there are now suggestions that the private providers will be both paid for their transactions under arrangements with the pharmacists and also be what is needed to get the medical e-PIP payments through until June 2014.
Seems to me they will be so settled in by then they will become permanent way things are done in OZ.
This is a classic example of where DoHA and NEHTA leadership and governance have clearly failed. They have been mucking about will all this for close to a decade already.
I wonder when we will see full interoperability between the two exchanges, instigated by the private providers themselves I suspect, and hopefully supported by Government. It is about time if we are to get the benefits prescription exchange can offer.
I have yet to spot any announcements in this area - let me know if you have - and, as we know, the ETP Standards via Standards Australia are a little way off yet (to say the least) so no real early hope there.
David.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 12th November, 2012.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Another quiet week with seemingly a lot actually happening under the surface. It seems recruitment of users to the NEHRS has really dropped to a trickle while we have vendors beavering away to make sure they can qualify for their customers receiving ePIP payments.
Interestingly my weekly browse of the NEHRS was complicated by two things.
1. It seems my name has changed again. Initially I was DAVID MORE. Then I became DAVID G MORE and at my check today I am DAVID G MORE (DR). I wonder what happens next?
2. The response time at 9:20am on Sunday was dreadful with the whirly wait icon spinning for up to 40 seconds before a screen painted. The system was basically unusable.
I did check here for availability and it was claimed all was well!
It was also good to see the silly national Internet filter finally canned. It was never going to work as intended and it is much better in my view to make parents responsible for child use of the Internet - despite what the loony Australian Christian Lobby say.
-----

Providers begin to connect with PCEHR

Providers are beginning to connect to the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) as they make use of the national Provider Portal and vendors release software for uploading clinical documents to the system.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) told eHealthspace.org 87 individual providers have now established authorisation links with one or more of the 143 healthcare organisations registered in the PCEHR system.
She added usability testing for the Provider Portal is continuing as they “seek to refine and improve the interface”, making use of input and feedback from clinicians.
-----

Health summary no click of a button

7 November, 2012 Paul Smith
GPs who have created more than 600 personally controlled electronic health records destined for the e-health system say the work is adding between five and 15 minutes to an average patient consultation.
The findings, which have not been officially released, were collected from 60 practices involved in the e-Health Collaborative, one of the pilot sites set up to test the system.
An unnamed source told Australian Doctor many GPs in the e-Health Collaborative believed specific funding for creating the summaries should be considered — either as a dedicated MBS item number or as a Service Incentives Payment.
-----

Apology over e-health advice

2 November, 2012 Sarah Colyer
A senior bureaucrat has formally apologised to a practice manager after she phoned the government’s e-health telephone helpline for advice and was told to read the 40-page Healthcare Identifiers Act.
Helen Portus, practice manager at Moss Vale Medical Centre, had called the line hoping for a clear explanation of confusing terminology involved in registering the practice for a healthcare identifier.
Ms Portus told Australian Doctor: “The process was seriously flawed”.
-----

Qld Health payroll system may be scrapped

Published 2:01 PM, 10 Nov 2012
AAP
Queensland's government may scrap the disastrous health payroll system over its failure to properly pay staff and allegations of collusion to ensure IBM won the contract for it.
Health Minister Lawrence Springborg says the enormity of the situation has forced him to question whether to keep the current system or start afresh.
"Queensland Health has been forever tarnished by a payroll system and a dodgy contract that they were not even a signatory to," he told AAP.
"Hundreds of millions of dollars spent on a failed and flawed system that has created misery, destroyed lives, overpaid, underpaid and not paid people at all."
-----

Putting medical app through its paces

APP NAME: Bublove
PUBLISHER: Epworth Hospital
COST: Free
PLATFORM: iPhone only (not Android)
PURPOSE: The app was developed by an Australian hospital and presents information and tools for expecting mothers to manage their pregnancy journey
-----

NEHTA report reveals funding, expense increases

The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) has confirmed it will continue to play a significant role in the future of Australian healthcare until at least 2014.
The organisation has released its 2011-12 Annual Report which reveals a significant year-on-year increase in funding from federal, state and territory governments. Expenses have also climbed during the period, reflecting a busy season that included the public introduction of the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
Headline figures include $237 million in total revenue (compared with $122 million in 2010-11), a 35 percent increase in staff costs (totalling $43.3 million) and contractor expenses which more than doubled to $19.9 million. Consultants also cost NEHTA $58.7 million compared to $33.1 million in the previous financial year.
-----

Project STOP could be used for codeine: Guild

7 November, 2012 Nick O'Donoghue
The Pharmacy Guild of Australia would support proposals to extend Project STOP to track codeine sales, but says such a move would require legislative changes at state and territory level.
The Guild’s backing for the expansion of Project STOP to provide real-time monitoring of sales of codeine containing products followed comments by Tasmania pharmacist, Michael Meaney, who told Pharmacy News that he, and other pharmacy owners in the state, were using the system to prevent people from pharmacy shopping for the drugs.
A Guild spokesperson told Pharmacy News it had previously sought approval for Project STOP to be used to track codeine sales, but there were legislative issues. 
-----
9 November 2012, 11.05am AEST

For your own good? Privacy law and enthusiastic pharmacists

Bruce Arnold
Lecturer in Law at University of Canberra
Earlier this week the ABC reported that a handful of pharmacists in Tasmania had engaged in community policing. They’re tracking the purchase of codeine-based painkillers, sharing information with their peers and refusing sales on the basis of that information.
Clearly, the road to privacy hell is paved with good intentions; these pharmacists are attempting to build a freeway that bypasses statutory protection. Their non-government initiative is supposedly justified by the need to protect people from codeine abuse.
The action is a private version of Project STOP, a government program that aims to restrict access to pseudoephedrine, which is a precursor of methamphetamine, aka speed or ice. Project STOP provides a real-time database for recording all requests for products containing pseudoephedrine.
-----

Lifehouse to spend $4 million on core network

Clinicians, patients and their carers will bring their own devices and connect to a secure wireless network across the hospital
The Chris O’Brien Lifehouse at RPA will spend $4 million on a Cisco network to initially support around 300 hospital staff and their patients at the new cancer treatment and research facility, set to open in September 2013.
The $230 million centre – named after the late head and neck surgeon Chris O’Brien – has engaged system integrator Dimension Data to deploy and support new wireless infrastructure, expected to go live in February.
Lifehouse has begun designing the network to support mobile clinicians, patients and their carers who want to bring their own devices – such as Apple iPads and iPhones, Android or other mobile gadgets – to the treatment centre.
-----

Fatal risk at heart of lax security

Date November 6, 2012

Ben Grubb

Deputy technology editor

A hacker with a laptop watches a crowd of people from a distance, presses a button and 10 people grip their chests and drop dead. The hacker then walks away, leaving no evidence of the mass murder he has just committed.
It sounds like a scene from a James Bond movie, but it's entirely possible.
Until these companies accept that there's a legitimate problem here, then zero progress will be made. 
Security flaws in pacemakers and defibrillators implanted in those with heart problems and designed to save lives could actually be putting users at risk, say IT security experts and a recent US government report.
-----

McKesson to Buy New Zealand Patient Flow Management Vendor

McKesson Corp. will purchase New Zealand-based Emendo Ltd, which sells software enabling hospitals to forecast patient demand and improve patient flow, for an undisclosed sum.
-----
November 08, 2012 09:45 ET

Orion Health and eHealth Saskatchewan Receive the Honour of Project Implementation Team of the Year at 2012 Canadian Health Informatics Awards

Awards celebrate and recognize contributions and commitment to Canadian Health Informatics Industry
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Nov. 8, 2012) - Orion Health, a leader in electronic healthcare records (EHR), and eHealth Saskatchewan have received Project Implementation Team of the Year at the Canadian Health Informatics Awards. The annual black tie gala honours individuals, companies, projects and teams for their exemplary role in using communications and information technology to improve the health of all Canadians. The 8th annual event took place Wednesday, November 7 at the Royal York Hotel in downtown Toronto, and was co-hosted by ITAC Health and Canada's Health Informatics Association (COACH).
-----

FARGP online course inadequate: ACRRM

7th Nov 2012
THE Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) has criticised the RACGP’s revamped Fellowship in Advanced Rural General Practice (FARGP) course, arguing its duration and online platform are inadequate.
The RACGP recently laun­ched the updated FARGP program and said the revised model included 12 months of advanced rural skills training and a six-month community-based project available to GPs and GP registrars as an inter­active online program.
However registrars will be able to seek exemption for components already undertaken, allowing the course to be completed in less time.
-----

MLs to run collaboratives program

8th Nov 2012
THE Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program (APCCP), involving 1100 general practices, will be transferred to the control of Medicare Locals, Health Minister Tanya Plibersek announced today.
Speaking at the Australian Medicare Local Alliance’s National Primary Health Care Conference in Adelaide today, Ms Plibersek also said the Commonwealth would contribute $5 million to a new ML preventive health program.
Addressing almost 1000 delegates, Ms Plibersek said changing responsibility for the APCCP from Canberra to MLs “recognises the network’s role in improving the effectiveness, safety and quality of the primary health care system”.
-----

GPs outdo patients and hotline for appropriate ED referrals

5th Nov 2012
GPs have the highest success rate in appropriately referring people to hospital emergency departments (EDs) while a Commonwealth-funded after hours telephone line fares slightly worse than people referring themselves, a new study claims.
The observational study - carried out by WA researchers and funded by the WA department of health - which analysed data from ED admissions in Royal Perth Hospital from August 2008 to April 2009, found that 89.7% of GP referrals were deemed “appropriate”.
By comparison, 73.8% of self-referrals to EDs were deemed appropriate and just 72.9% of referrals from the federal government funded healthdirect telephone line were deemed appropriate, the study, published in this week’s Medical Journal of Australia, said.
-----

Consumer privacy laws face delays

NEW laws that could result in companies being fined up to $1.1 million for privacy breaches could face further delays to accommodate recommendations in parliamentary reports.
The bill would need to go for final debate in the Senate in the coming week to have a chance of passing this year but a spokeswoman for the Attorney-General said the government was "actively considering" changing it to give consumers better protection.
"In particular, a number of recommendations would give additional power and rights to consumers. For example, allowing corrections to be made to an individual's credit report if their financial difficulty occurred as a result of natural disasters, fraud or mail theft," the spokeswoman said.
-----

Government gives up plan for Internet filter

Kevin Rudd promised to introduce an Internet filter when Labor won office at the 2007 election, but it was always a controversial policy.
  • AAP (Computerworld)
  • 09 November, 2012 08:50
Labor has abandoned its controversial plan to introduce an Internet filter, but is banning all websites related to child abuse.
The federal government will use its powers under the Telecommunications Act to block hundreds of child abuse websites already identified by Interpol, Fairfax reports.
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said blocking these websites met "community expectations and fulfils the government's commitment to preventing Australian internet users from accessing child abuse material online".
-----
Enjoy!
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 144 – Results – 12th November, 2012.

The question was:

Will Something Recognisable As The Current NEHTA Exist Or Will A New Entity Emerge To Support E-Health Or Will DoHA Absorb NEHTA Within Two Years?



NEHTA Will Stay Unchanged 0%

NEHTA Will Be Slightly Modified 5%

NEHTA Will Be Dramatically Changed 11%

NEHTA Will Be Replaced By A New Entity 18%

DoHA Will Absorb NEHTA 50%

I Have No Idea 16%

Total votes: 56

Very interesting. Great participation again - It seems just on 50% or readers see NEHTA being absorbed into DoHA! 68% see NEHTA vanishing one way or another.

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

The US Election - Some Interesting Aspects Related To E-Health and Big Data.

As most readers will now be aware President Barack Obama has found himself with a second four year term that starts January 20, 2013.
First a couple of reports on what the re-election is thought to have on Health IT in the US. First we have:

How Health IT Benefits From Obama's Re-election

The fed's health IT incentive program will continue, along with related programs, but one prominent analyst suggests the biggest threat to the EHR incentive program now is the 'fiscal cliff.'
By Ken Terry,  InformationWeek
November 08, 2012
The day after President Obama was re-elected and Democrats held onto control of the U.S. Senate, the future looked bright to folks in the health IT field.
The election outcome suggested that attacks on the government's electronic health record incentive program by Congressional Republicans may lose steam or disappear altogether. Coincidentally, the Health IT Policy Committee met on Oct. 7 to discuss a draft of its Meaningful Use Stage 3 recommendations. AdTech Ad
Robin Raiford, research director for the Meaningful Use practice of the Advisory Board Co., a healthcare consulting firm, listened in on the committee meeting, which was chaired by Farzad Mostashari, national coordinator of health IT. The tenor of the discussion, she told Information Week Healthcare, was that the committee would "move forward and finish the work that's been started."
Raiford was elated. "Like many other people working in this space, I hoped that the momentum would not stop. So it was a great relief to know it would continue on."
Even before the election, she said, she hadn't expected abrupt changes in federal support for health IT, no matter who won. One reason for this stability, she noted, is that the HITECH Act authorizing the EHR incentive program -- part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- can't be changed or repealed by executive order.
For the same reason, Congressional critics of the incentive program, which to date has disbursed about $7.7 billion, can't force the Department of Health and Human Services to suspend the payments unless they can muster enough political support to repeal the law. That could have happened only if there had been a Republican sweep of Congress and the White House.
Second we have the following from the Head of the Office of the National Co-ordinator for Health IT.

Mostashari: Obama re-election points to critical role of data

By Mary Mosquera
Farzad Mostashari, MD, the national health IT coordinator, said that data and analytics played a critical role in the campaign and re-election of President Barack Obama – mirroring the growing importance of data in healthcare.  
Data and analytics have transformed marketing, campaigning, and even baseball. “How is it possible for us to imagine a world where that power of data is not brought to bear on life and death, clinical care, on population health, and affirming the path that we are on with health IT and bringing data to life?” Mostashari said in comments about his thoughts the morning after the election at the Nov. 7 meeting of the federal advisory Health IT Policy Committee.
During the campaign, the analysis of surveys, polls and computer models drew considerable discussion about whether they were going to bear out their findings and be accurate, or not.
 “It was something of a relief that data matters, that science matters, that predictions can be based on evidence,” he said, adding that there was also “relief in seeing a truce in data.”
“We sometimes see this in our corner of the world, where the preponderance of the evidence, the 92 percent of studies, can be positive and show benefits, but if there is uncertainty and differences,” others can play up a narrative of opposing realities, Mostashari said.
 Lots more here:
So broadly we will see four more years of investments, incentives and innovation in health IT and we will see the US Meaningful Use of Health IT program continue to drive adoption and use of EHRs.
The other point that was made by Dr Mostashari regarding the importance of data is also very interesting.
It is now emerging that the Obama team used an amazing amount of technology - most especially data mining - to create a database of potential voters by demographic and then used this database in the same way as marketing companies and Google use the information to serve each demographic with information they wanted to hear. Car workers were told how the car industry had been saved, young women were told about Obama’s view on abortion and gay marriage etc. etc.
In the end the election was not even really close with the electoral college being won (which is what matters) by a good 60+ out of a total of 538 votes (332/206).
In essence ‘big data’ techniques allowed the Obama team to work out where their strengths were (from polling data etc.), message them and then get them out to vote. In this way they better exploited each of the minorities (blacks, Hispanics, Asians, young women etc.) and interestingly while polls missed it most modellers and betting markets saw Obama as a winner long before the day.
You can be the Australian political parties will all be planning to use their citizen data-bases - which are exempt from the Privacy Act - to try and replicate what Obama achieved.
Last technology point is that the Republican’s ORCA system - designed to help get the vote out - had not been properly tested and failed on election day! There is a lesson there I reckon.
Bottom line is all this is that these ‘big data’ tools can really work and can really make a difference. We have only seen the beginning of the use of this technology in Health I suspect.
David.