Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 21st June, 2015.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

Why Health Care IT Is Still on Life Support

Electronic health records were supposed to save money—and lives. So far, they’ve mostly made doctors angry.
June 11, 2015
When technology “disrupts” it creates winners and losers. Hello smartphone! So long camera, encyclopedia, newspaper, book, CD, courtship, attention span. Disruption isn’t just inevitable, it’s righteous. Question tech and you’re not only a relic, you’re a job-killer and a Luddite, and possibly a Unabomber.
The information technology tsunami has hit so fast that most of us haven’t had time to think about what we might be sacrificing by trying to ride it. And that’s particularly true when it comes to the delivery of health services. 
With the best of intentions, the Obama administration six years ago launched the HITECH Act, a $30 billion program to put electronic health records (EHR) in every hospital and doctors’ office. It offered incentives for docs who bought and “meaningfully used” the technology, and penalties—which start to kick in this year—for those who failed to adopt the new technology quickly enough. The goal was to get doctors to store patient data and share it electronically with the patients, other physicians, public health agencies, laboratories and other players in the vast health care enterprise that accounts for one-fifth of our economy.
-----

Challenges persist to collection, use of routine health data

June 12, 2015 | By Katie Dvorak
Routine data can be a helpful tool in healthcare, but for such information to have a real impact--especially in the creation of a learning health system--certain challenges must be addressed.
Unlike information collected for research purposes, routine data is analyzed to help in the delivery of care for patients, a commentary on the trend published BMJ Quality and Safety discusses. Sometimes this data doesn't always show the full picture of the patient's health; the authors--from the London-based Health Foundation--call this a "data shadow" because often there is information that may be missing from a patient's record that has direct influence on their health.
Routine data can include administrative information such as reimbursement and contracting; clinically generated data, which includes information collected by healthcare workers to provide diagnosis and treatment; and some patient generated data that can be asked for by a clinician or offered up by the patient.
-----

EHR vendor Medical Information Engineering suffers cyberattack

June 12, 2015 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Cloud EHR vendor Medical Information Engineering (MIE) has revealed that it suffered a data breach affecting the electronic medical records of some of its clients' patients.
In a notice dated June 10, the Fort Wayne, Indiana-based vendor stated that it discovered suspicious activity May 26 related to one of its servers. MIE is investigating the incident and has reported it to law enforcement. The vendor also is reporting the incident to its affected clients, as well as to applicable federal and state authorities. Such clients include Concentra, Fort Wayne Neurological Center, Franciscan St. Francis Health Indianapolis, Gynecology Center, Inc., in Fort Wayne and Rochester Medical Group, as well as patients associated with MIE's NoMoreClipboard subsidiary.
The data potentially compromised includes patient names, Social Security numbers, lab results, medical conditions and other information; it does not include financial data, since the vendor doesn't collect or store such information.
-----

How hard is it to 'Get My Health Data'?

Posted on Jun 12, 2015
By Michelle Ronan Noteboom, Contributing writer
"We the people want easy, electronic access to our health information."
That's the seemingly simple objective for supporters of Get My Health Data, a new initiative organized by former National Coordinator for Health IT Farzad Mostashari, MD.
Folks like ePatientDave, Regina Holliday, and other patient advocates have spent years fighting for better patient access to health data, but support for the movement has reached new heights, thanks to recently proposed changes to the meaningful use program.
In April, CMS stirred up the patient data access hornets' nest by proposing a modification to the Stage 2 meaningful use requirement that 5 percent of a provider's patient population views, downloads, or transmits their online health information.
-----

Ontario Poised to Toughen Medical Privacy Laws

JUN 12, 2015 7:19am ET
The minister of health in Ontario, Canada wants to double fines for breaches of patient medical information and remove a major barrier to investigating breaches.
Eric Hoskins is proposing new legislation to be introduced in the fall that would double maximum fines levied against individuals to $100,000, and against businesses to $500,000, multiple Canadian news outlets report.
The legislation if enacted as proposed would scrap a requirement that prosecutions resulting from a breach start no later than six months following the breach. The Canadian Press news service reports that because the requirement—introduced in 2004—is so tough to meet, only three cases have been referred for prosecution with one case unsuccessful and two others still being considered.
-----

7 conditions necessary for interoperability

June 11, 2015 | By Susan D. Hall
Standards alone are not sufficient to achieve interoperability, according to David McCallie, M.D., senior vice president of medical informatics for Cerner.
McCallie, who also has served as a member of the Health IT Standards Committee since its beginnings in 2009, warns against the notion that nothing has been achieved in a guest post on the blog of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center CIO John Halamka.
"In particular, we have mostly settled the vocabulary questions for encoding the record," McCallie says. "We have widely deployed a good e-prescribing standard. We have established a standard for secure email that will eventually replace the fax machine, and we have widely [but not yet universally] deployed a good standard for document-centric query exchange."
-----

HELP panel persists on EHR usability

Posted on Jun 11, 2015
By Bernie Monegain, Editor-at-Large
"We're here today to announce an intensive review of electronic health records," Sen. Lamar Alexander, chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions, announced at the start of a hearing before the panel Wednesday.
Alexander, R-Tenn., noted there is wide bipartisan interest in the issue. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a ranking member of HELP, has joined Alexander to form a working group on EHR usability.
It's not the first time Alexander has made his concerns over EHRs known to the committee. On Wednesday, though, he and Murray entered their remarks into the record and moved onto testimony from four invited experts.
-----

E-Referral Service booked in for Monday

9 June 2015  Thomas Meek
The NHS e-Referral Service will finally go live this Monday, replacing Choose and Book; but users shouldn't expect major changes until later in the summer.
In a conference call this afternoon (Tuesday), the Health and Social Care Information Centre said the transition  will begin on the evening of Friday, 12 June and continue over the weekend, with new the service available from the morning of Monday, 15 June.
Stephen Miller, medical director for the e-Referral Service project, said he expected that every person who is able to use Choose and Book on Friday evening would be able to use the new system on Monday morning "with no additional training”.
-----

Where Did the Excitement Go at Health Datapalooza?

by Andy Oram Thursday, June 11, 2015
Health Datapalooza used to be the most exciting event in health IT, but this year a torpor hung over it. I confirmed this feeling with numerous colleagues and traced it to a few different trends, some within control of the conference organizers and some outside it.
The essential problem, many of my friends agreed, is that the applications market and other signs of progress in health IT are taking too long to launch. Many excellent building blocks are falling into place in both technology (DirectTrust and FHIR) and policy (recent announcements by CMS, as well as private insurers, that they will greatly increase risk sharing and pay-for-value). But these are slow to produce change.
In former centuries, religious fanatics would sell off all their possessions in expectation of the Messiah's imminent arrival. These believers' disappointment must have resembled that of current health entrepreneurs who sink their life savings into a company promoting some innovative health care reform and who then wait for the market to come around to their solutions.
-----

Health IT could curb prescription drug abuse, but adoption lags

Legal uncertainties and challenges with interoperability and usability have kept many healthcare providers from embracing systems for electronic prescribing of controlled substances.

CIO | Jun 11, 2015 3:51 AM PT
WASHINGTON -- If health technology is ever going to achieve the goal of lowering the rates of prescription drug abuse, developers and policy makers will have to do more to encourage adoption of electronic prescribing systems among healthcare providers.
More than 500 top IT leaders responded to our online survey to help us gauge the state of the
In a panel discussion here at a recent health IT conference, experts agreed that e-prescribing tools can help curb abuse of controlled substances by limiting drug diversion and doctor shopping, as well as cracking down on physicians who prescribe drugs for non-medical purposes.
-----

What goes wrong when medical records are transferred

Posted on Jun 10, 2015
By Scott Rea, DigiCert
The massive data breaches that struck CareFirst Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Anthem and Premera over the past year have sounded an alarm among healthcare IT. And with hackers eager to steal valuable patient data, it’s time the healthcare sector act more aggressively to secure private data.
Consider that, according to research from Gartner, close to 40 million healthcare records have been breached to date. That number, Gartner’s research suggests, is a conservative estimate because it takes into account only breaches of at least 500 individuals at a time.
And, the cost of a healthcare breach continues to climb, according to the Ponemon Institute, to about $363 per exposed personally identifiable record. That’s more than double the average cost of a data breach in other industries, and the trend holds across 11 industrialized nations. Our industry is a target, and we must do more now.
-----

PwC: Healthcare Spending Growth Rate to Dip 6.5% in 2016

Spending growth in the $2.9 trillion US health economy is expected to slow in 2016 as compared to 2015; however, it will still outpace overall economic inflation. Stock prices, earnings reports and the customer base have increased and that means the industry is financially healthy. Sadly, affordable healthcare remains out-of-reach for many consumers.
PwC’s Health Research Institute (HRI) projects the U.S. healthcare spending growth rate will dip to 6.5 percent in 2016, capping a ten-year trend of slowing employer medical cost-trend growth in the employer-sponsored market. For this research, HRI interviewed industry executives, health policy experts and health plan actuaries whose companies cover more than 100 million employer based members. HRI also analyzed results from PwC’s 2015 Health and Well-being Touchstone survey of more than 1,100 employers from 36 industries and a national consumer survey of more than 1,000 US adults.
-----

Medicines review

This time last year, things were looking up for e-prescribing, with NHS England apparently managing the market for a big roll-out through the tech funds. Then tech fund 2 was effectively cancelled. Kim Thomas asks whether the benefits of e-prescribing are enough to see it implemented, anyway.
This time last year, the future looked bright for e-prescribing in the NHS. The announcement of the ‘Safer Hospitals, Safer Wards: Technology Fund’ (tech fund 1) and then the ‘Integrated Digital Care Fund’ (tech fund 2) promised to introduce digital technology into one of the few NHS activities still largely untouched by IT.
As Lyn Whitfield reported, it looked as if about 80-90 trusts would soon be in the market for e-prescribing systems. But it was, in the words of Paul Thomson, e-prescribing lead at Ascribe, a “false dawn”.
Health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s March decision to slash the funding for tech fund 2 from £240 million to just £43 million brought the process skidding to a halt.
It leaves NHS England “behind the curve”, says Thomson: “The other NHS regions are powering ahead with this, so it just surprises us.” Robyn Tolley, managing director of NoemaLife, agrees, describing the decision as “bitterly disappointing” for the industry.
-----

The Adolescence of Patient Information

Hannah Galvin, MD
Jun 05, 2015
A lot of people complain about adolescents. They don’t listen. They act out. They talk like they have it all figured out. I disagree. As a pediatrician, this is my favorite group of patients. They have developed cognitively to be aware of the world’s complexities, and yet are still open to guidance as you help them navigate their way through. Adolescence can be challenging, but it is also an exciting time filled with potential.
I remember sitting with one particular 16-year-old girl, her shoulders slumped, eyes glued to sneakers, as I asked about her marijuana use and sexual activity. Gently, with a tolerance for the silence, a sense of humor, and a carefully placed curse word, I was able to earn her gaze. And she, in turn, was gradually able to disclose underlying symptoms of depression, for which we started treatment. Discussion of sensitive issues takes a delicate touch and a trustworthy provider, one who understands the privilege it is to bear such an influential role in someone’s life.
-----

AMA Supports EHR Training for Medical Students

JUN 9, 2015 7:08am ET
At its annual meeting on Monday, the American Medical Association adopted a new policy to provide medical students with “hands-on” experience with electronic health records to improve patient care and increase the accuracy of clinical communications.
Specifically, AMA’s policy recommends that medical students—with appropriate supervision—learn as part of their education how to document patient encounters and enter clinical orders into patients' EHRs. Towards that end, AMA has committed to working with medical school accreditation bodies to support U.S. medical schools, as well as residency and fellowship training programs, in teaching students how to use electronic devices in the examination room and at the hospital bedside.
The new policy calls for “determining the characteristics of an ideal software system” for teaching EHRs to students that could be used at medical schools and teaching hospitals.
-----

No 'silver bullet' for health data protection, security expert says

June 9, 2015 | By Susan D. Hall
Healthcare companies and organizations must not focus solely on technology when it comes to protecting sensitive information, according to privacy and security expert Kate Borten.
"There is nowhere near a single silver bullet," says Borten, founder of privacy and security consultancy The Marblehead Group, in an interview with HealthcareInfoSecurity. "Anyone involved with an information security program understands that there are a gazillion strategies, controls and safeguards to protect data."
Prior to founding Marblehead, Borten led the enterprisewide security program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and established the first information security program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. She urges organizations to also consider physical security and notes that many of the controls required with HIPAA are administrative ones.
-----

Survey: Only 30 percent of insured consumers want to track health on a mobile device

By: Jonah Comstock | Jun 8, 2015        
A new survey of 1,200 consumers with either self- or employer-sponsored health insurance — sponsored by HealthMine and conducted by Survey Sampling International — indicates that interest in payer-led mobile health initiatives is still fairly low.
Although 89 percent of respondents use a smartphone, tablet, or both, only 30 percent of those surveyed said they would participate in a program offered by their wellness program that would require them to use a mobile app to track or monitor their health. And only 18 percent said they liked to learn health, wellness, and lifestyle information from a mobile app.
“Even though mobile applications have incredible potential to help consumers manage their health, they are still in the early stages of growth.” Bryce Williams, CEO and President of HealthMine, said in a statement. “As plan sponsors evaluate apps for their wellness programs, they should look for those that incorporate actionable clinical data and personalization to increase engagement. But we’re still waiting for the ultimate oxymoron: a ‘killer app’ for wellness.”
-----

Privacy Workgroup Prepares ‘Big Data’ Recommendations

June 8, 2015
Does health data usage not covered by HIPAA need more oversight?
The Privacy and Security Workgroup of the Health IT Policy Committee is preparing a set of recommendations about how the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT should approach “big data” issues for both HIPAA-covered entities as well as for the marketplace outside the HIPAA sphere. 
At a June 8 meeting, Deven McGraw, a partner in the healthcare practice of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP and the workgroup’s chair, led a discussion of draft recommendations to identify gaps in law and regulation around issues including data de-identification and security as well as areas for further inquiry.
McGraw noted that outside the HIPAA-covered space, there is not a clearly defined right for patients to access data collected about them. She said there has been a debate with respect to medical devices, such as one patient who made a public argument that he had the right to access data from his pacemaker. The workgroup proposes to remind ONC that outside the HIPAA space, voluntarily adopted codes of conduct can be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, and many of those codes are under development. 
-----

Health IT is Essential to Patient Engagement

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , June 9, 2015

Patient data, a longitudinal patient record, and patient identifiers remain valid goals of healthcare reform, despite unhappiness with meaningful use.

Last week I spoke with a former CIO who assembled a longitudinal patient record dating back 12 years from seven different healthcare organizations her system didn't own, all of which had agreed to use a single patient ID defined by her system's master-patient index. She made this record accessible via the Web to providers and patients.
This wasn't a recent development. The system went live in 2004 with 700,000 patients.
But then that CIO received a fateful phone call from a patient.
-----

CSC to pay $190M for NHS fraud claims

Posted on Jun 08, 2015
By Mike Miliard, Editor
CSC has agreed to settle with the Securities and Exchange Commission to the tune of $190 million, after SEC charged the firm with "manipulating financial results and concealing significant problems" related to its massive IT contract for U.K.’s National Health Service
That contract was part of NHS' since-abandoned National Programme for IT initiative, a disastrously problem-plagued project marked by huge cost overruns, missed deadlines and undelivered promises.
Launched in 2002, the £11 billion initiative was billed as the biggest civilian technology undertaking in the world – a top-down plan to outfit hospitals and health trusts nationwide with electronic health records linked into an interoperable NHS-wide framework.
-----

5 steps to combat health alert overload

June 8, 2015 | By Susan D. Hall
With a combination of electronic health records, wireless connectivity, mobile devices and more, healthcare is ready for a solution to alert overload, according to Vitaly Herasevich, an associate professor of anesthesiology and medicine in the department of anesthesiology at the Mayo Clinic. The 2015 edition of the ECRI Institute's top 10 patient safety concerns for healthcare organizations once again named alarm hazards as its No. 1 issue.
It's time for ambient intelligence in the hospital, Herasevich wrote in an article at HIMSS News, who outlines five steps toward that end, including:
  1. The new generation of alerts can be improved from massive amounts of data already collected in the EHR. Deep understanding of disease and pharmacological effects of treatment are essential to creating smart rules for alerts, he says.
  2. Ambient systems need to recognize patient treatment processes to deliver alerts to the right person at the right time in the workflow process.
  3. Real-time feedback to bedside providers is essential, Herasevich says. Alert systems should constantly analyze responses to alerts and adjust accordingly.
  4. The fourth step in rules development is clinical validation against a gold standard, which requires clinical research similar as the study of new drug, he says.
  5. Regulatory approval of complex smart rules should be the last, fifth step to ensure efficiency, safety and support any commercial claims.
-----

NHS details released against patients' wishes, admits data body

Health and Social Care Information Centre failed to log requests of up to 700,000 patients not to pass on details and says issue ‘may take some time’ to resolve
The body responsible for releasing NHS patient data to organisations has admitted information about patients has been shared against their wishes, it has emerged.
Requests by up to 700,000 patients for details from their records not to be passed on, registered during preparations for the creation of a giant medical database, have not been met.
But the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) told MPs that it “does not currently have the resources or processes to handle such a significant level of objection” and it also encountered technical issues over logging the preferences.
Patients registered their objections during the development of the controversial care data system but the plans were shelved in March 2014.
-----

San Diego HIE To See Participation Boost With New Providers, Consent Change

by Lisa Zamosky, iHealthBeat Contributing Reporter Monday, June 8, 2015
SAN DIEGO -- San Diego Health Connect, the region's health information exchange, is expected to get a big boost with the addition of the area's three largest health systems.  
Scripps Health, Sharp HealthCare and the University of California-San Diego Medical Center join about 100 other facilities already participating in Health Connect, including Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, Kaiser Permanente, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense.
The community-wide HIE -- which allows patient medical records to be shared among the region's competing health care providers -- currently has consent from about 1.5 million patients.
To expedite participation among patients from Scripps, Sharp, UC-San Diego, and other providers, Health Connect and its participating organizations recently adopted a new policy to gain patient authorization. Patients must now opt out of the program, rather than explicitly give consent to participate.
-----

NHS data systems diagnosed with ‘Incompetentitus’

The NHS has confirmed this weekend that ‘hundreds, maybe thousands, probably lots’ of patient records have been passed to third parties against the patients’ wishes. A spokesman said: ‘We couldn’t help it, there was no way we could stop ourselves, and despite our strongest desires we just had to accept payments for this data. We’ll probably have to have a party or pay some bonuses to get rid of it. Maybe we could use it to influence the location of the World Cup?’
Experts are worried that the contagion might spread to other government agencies using the same incompetent computer system suppliers. A MoD spokesman confirmed that most of the Trident Missiles are currently pointing at UK targets, due to payments from Russia. ‘We don’t like it, but cash is cash, and anyway, it’s what the computer says’, he said.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Now This Is A Very Big Number For Health IT Benefits I Wonder How Real It Actually Is?

Reports of an interesting study appeared a little while ago.
The first report is here:

IT could save $100B for US healthcare

Posted on Jun 05, 2015
By Mike Miliard, Editor
New research from Accenture projects that digital health tools will save the U.S. healthcare industry more than $100 billion over the next four years.
In 2014 alone, it calculates, technology such as Web-enabled devices, digital diagnostic tools and other FDA-approved IT help achieve some $6 billion in reduced costs – mostly thanks to things such as improved medication adherence, behavior modifications and fewer emergency room visits.
Accenture expects that number to approach $10 billion this year and $18 billion next year – increasing to $30 billion in 2017 and $50 billion in 2018 as these technologies take hold, proliferate and evolve.
It also predicts that FDA approval of digital health tools will triple by the end of 2018, to 100 (up from from just 33 this past year).
"A digital disruption is playing out in healthcare, as witnessed by the emergence of new business models and technology that will change the nature of patient interactions, alter consumer expectations and ultimately improve health outcomes," said Rick Ratliff, Accenture's managing director of digital health solutions in a press statement.
Factors, such as government health IT mandates, payment reform and other regulatory changes are accelerate the growth of FDA-approved digital solutions, the report shows.
Increasing ubiquity of health IT among physicians and patients will enable more and more devices to integrate with patient portals and digital health records, according to Accenture, which finds that one in four U.S. physicians routinely use telemonitoring devices for some aspect of chronic disease management.
More here:
There is another report here:

FDA-cleared digital health devices to save healthcare $100B by 2018

By: Jonah Comstock | Jun 4, 2015        

FDA clearances for digital health devices are on track to triple by 2018, according to new research from Accenture, as digital health offerings drive more than $100 billion in savings over that same time period.
Thirty-three digital health devices were cleared by the FDA in 2014, according to Accenture, and they predict 100 will be cleared in 2018.
The research group estimates that FDA-cleared digital health devices — defined as “an internet-connected device or software created for detection or treatment of a medical indication” — saved the US healthcare system $6 billion last year in the form of improved medication adherence, behavior modifications and fewer emergency room visits. They predict that savings will grow to $10 billion in 2015, $18 billion in 2016, $30 billion in 2017 and $50 billion in 2018.
“A digital disruption is playing out in healthcare, as witnessed by the emergence of new business models and technology that will change the nature of patient interactions, alter consumer expectations and ultimately improve health outcomes,” Rick Ratliff, managing director of digital health solutions at Accenture, said in a statement.
More here:
The sad things with such studies is that the authors never seem to come back five years later to let us know how it worked out!
We can all be hopeful - as if applied to Australia might mean about 1/20 (the relative size of the two economies) of that amount in Australia with e-Health done right which is still a fair bit!
David.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

2016 Budget - Labor Backs Down On Some More Saving Measures - We Are Presently In The Last Two Weeks of Parliament Until Spring.

June 18 Edition
Budget Night was May 12, 2015.
The selling phase is over and now we are to see the passage through Parliament this week and next.
I suspect the remarks from Mr Hockey re housing costs may still be reverberating!
As ever it is hard to know just what will be the big news in these last two weeks.
Here is some of the recent news and analysis.

General Budget Issues.

The Budget Office revealed Australia would be $42.5 billion better off by scrapping negative gearing

Olivia Chang Jun 7, 2015, 10:32 AM
A push to abolish negative gearing could put a temporary lid on Sydney and Melbourne’s surging property market — and bolster the pockets of the federal government.
Figures released by the Parliamentary Budget Office revealed government revenue would increase by $3 billion over the next four years — that’s $42.5 billion over the next 10 years — by curtailing negative gearing.
The tax break — allowing investors to claim expenses for rental properties to reduce their overall taxable income — is utilised by 1.3 million Australian landlords who claimed $13.8 billion in tax losses in 2012 to offset other income, according to ATO data.
Despite this, only a small sector of wealthy Australians in the top income brackets have been able to reap the benefits of negative gearing flow. Research by the Australia Institute think tank revealed one third of the rebates from negative gearing went to the richest 10% of households with more than half going to the wealthiest 20%.
-----

Hockey’s bogeyman: govt debt explained

11:00pm, Jun 7, 2015
James Fernyhough Money Editor
The Coalition has dropped the debt and deficit scaremongering, but it’s still borrowing like crazy. Here’s how it works.
 ‘Debt and deficit’ is the bogeyman that helped the Coalition crush Labor in the 2013 election, but since the May budget it has rarely been invoked.
That’s not because there has been any change to the status quo. The government is still borrowing hundreds of millions of dollars every week.
Rather, it’s because, first, the government has failed to devise a compelling strategy to fix the deficit; and second, Treasurer Joe Hockey has realised that by talking down the economy, he is spooking businesses and consumers.
-----
9 Jun 2015 - 4:43pm

Joe Hockey Advises Young People To “Just Have More Money”

By The Backburner
9 Jun 2015 - 4:43 PM
After a controversial Federal Budget and continued inflated housing prices, exasperated Treasurer Joe Hockey has advised Australian taxpayers to just “have more money” and consider simply “being rich” in the face of new government rebates for business and continued cuts.
“Honestly, it’s not that huge of a deal,” said Hockey after prolonged criticism of Australian housing prices, the Budget and the Government’s general direction. “There wouldn’t be that much of an issue if everyone just had a little bit more cash floating around. We’d be totally fine if that were the case.”
Despite renewed opposition to negative gearing and increased cost of living, there has been little attempt to resolve this from the Government. Speaking from Canberra, Hockey spoke plainly on the issues facing young Australian. “I understand the struggles facing young people today, but most of them could be alleviated if they simply had more money, or considered making more money in the very near future.”
-----

Joe Hockey is wrong, houses are becoming unaffordable

Date June 10, 2015 - 2:34AM

Peter Martin

Economics Editor, The Age

Would-be owner-occupiers have become a minority in a housing market they once dominated.
The latest figures released on Tuesday show would-be owner-occupiers accounted for just 48.4 per cent of the money borrowed for home loans in April - the lowest proportion on record.
Investors accounted for the other 51.6 per cent.
The figures were released as the Treasurer Joe Hockey told a Sydney media conference that housing was still affordable, saying if it wasn't, "no one would be buying it".
The figures suggest that housing is becoming increasingly unaffordable for would-be residents who find themselves outbid by investors armed with the tax advantages associated with negative gearing.
-----

How the Abbott government stopped us talking about NATSEM's modelling of their budget

Date June 12, 2015 - 12:15AM

Gareth Hutchens

The Abbott government doesn't want you to think critically about the budget.
If it did, it would have welcomed the modelling from the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM) a couple of weeks ago.
The budget may seem like old news now, but it shouldn't.
It's going to lead to serious losses of disposable income for low and middle income families, with a single-parent family with two children (with an annual income of $55,000) set to lose a huge $20,648 by the end of 2018/19.
That's what NATSEM found.
-----

Treasurer Joe Hockey's gaffes on housing have put more lead in the federal government's saddle-bags

Date June 13, 2015 - 12:15AM

James Massola

Political correspondent

In January 2014, as he got down to the hard work of preparing his first budget, Joe Hockey told a colleague the year ahead would see the sun set on his "Sunrise Joe" persona.
The new Treasurer grasped, acutely, the size of the task ahead.
When Joe is on he is fantastic but when he is not, he is dreadful 
Federal coalition MP
Eighteen months later, Hockey's colleagues are talking about another gaffe this week from an accident prone Treasurer.
-----

Abbott's tax review process is 'infected' Federal Court judge says

Date June 13, 2015 - 9:20AM

Nassim Khadem

A Federal Court judge has slammed the Abbott government for ruling out changes to negative gearing, superannuation concessions and GST as part of its tax review, saying the entire debate is politically infected and "handcuffed" from being able to achieve any useful reform.
Justice Richard Edmonds, who was appointed to the Federal Court under the Howard government in May 2005 and has previously been critical of the lack of political will by leaders to carry out tax reform, said the Abbott government's review will turn out to be just as useless as the former Labor government's attempts back in 2009.
Former treasury secretary Ken Henry carried out a review back then, which was released in 2010 by the then treasurer Wayne Swan, but Mr Henry and his panel were restricted from including GST in the debate.
-----

Health Budget Issues.

Doctors must be allowed to speak freely on poor detention centre conditions

Date June 8, 2015 - 4:43PM

Nicholas Talley

As a doctor, my work is defined by examining the evidence and recommending the solution. This applies whether I'm treating patients as a gastroenterologist or advocating for change as the president of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
The evidence from Australia's immigration detention centres is in. They seriously and irrefutably harm the health of children and adults who have sought our protection. 
As a doctor, I cannot think of any other scenario in which my ability to speak freely about serious harms being inflicted on my patients would be restricted.  
-----

Medicines to cost more and healthcare will suffer, according to Wikileaks documents

Date June 10, 2015 - 11:41PM

Philip Dorling

Exclusive
Secret trade negotiations, new details of which have been released by WikiLeaks, will undermine Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and push up the cost of medicines for the Australian public.  
In the latest of a series of high profile leaks, WikiLeaks has published more draft treaty text from the controversial Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations which the Abbott government claims will boost trade and investment across 40 per cent of the world economy. 
Trade and healthcare experts are deeply concerned that the TPP agreement has the potential to undermine Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and other similar health programs such as that administered by New Zealand's Pharmaceutical Management Agency.  
-----

Medical Research Fund

$20b fund for future trapped in party row over use

Andrew Tillett, Canberra
June 8, 2015, 12:35 am
The fate of the Abbott Government’s $20 billion Medical Research Future Fund hangs in the balance, with growing concerns the process to divvy up funding could become politicised.
Palmer United Party’s WA senator Dio Wang has joined Labor and the Greens in raising questions over the governance arrangements for the fund.
The Government plans to pour savings from the health system into the fund, with it expected to swell to $20 billion by mid-2020.
The fund is meant to start operations on August 1, with an initial $10 million to be distributed to researchers in 2015-16.

Pharmacy Issues.

Guild member fees slashed by 25% for a year

Pharmacy Guild members will have their 2015-16 Membership renewal rates reduced by 25% as a thank you to all Members for their support during the negotiation of the 6CPA, the Guild has announced in Forefront.

Both the proprietor and the premises components of the Guild annual subscription will be reduced by 25% in the Unity Rebate and this will be reflected in the Guild’s annual membership subscriptions, which are currently being mailed out to members.
Pharmacy Guild National President George Tambassis says the Guild wanted to provide the Unity Rebate due to the massive support from its members on the ground.
“After the huge grass-roots effort visiting, calling and writing to local politicians, the Guild has decided to acknowledge the critical role played by our members which has been absolutely instrumental in the 6CPA outcome,” he says.
-----
It is going to be very interesting to see what happens to the polls and consumer confidence over the next 2-3 months - especially if we see the Senate knocking more savings back as is seeming likely! Already there was a small drop in confidence last week and no improvement this week. The monthly measurement - post budget - was not good at all!
Enjoy.
David.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Does This Fascinating Article Remind You Of Somewhere Closer To Home?

This appeared a few days ago.

Why Health Care IT Is Still on Life Support

Electronic health records were supposed to save money—and lives. So far, they’ve mostly made doctors angry.
June 11, 2015
Lead image by AP Photo.
When technology “disrupts” it creates winners and losers. Hello smartphone! So long camera, encyclopedia, newspaper, book, CD, courtship, attention span. Disruption isn’t just inevitable, it’s righteous. Question tech and you’re not only a relic, you’re a job-killer and a Luddite, and possibly a Unabomber.
The information technology tsunami has hit so fast that most of us haven’t had time to think about what we might be sacrificing by trying to ride it. And that’s particularly true when it comes to the delivery of health services. 
With the best of intentions, the Obama administration six years ago launched the HITECH Act, a $30 billion program to put electronic health records (EHR) in every hospital and doctors’ office. It offered incentives for docs who bought and “meaningfully used” the technology, and penalties—which start to kick in this year—for those who failed to adopt the new technology quickly enough. The goal was to get doctors to store patient data and share it electronically with the patients, other physicians, public health agencies, laboratories and other players in the vast health care enterprise that accounts for one-fifth of our economy.
There was just one problem: Medicine may have been in dire need of a high-tech revolution, but the Obama administration did not think hard enough about whether the technology was ready for medicine.
Doctors certainly seemed like a tech-friendly bunch for whom computerization would come naturally: They prescribed new drugs and prodded and inspected and sliced at us with increasingly sophisticated gadgets. But they still listened to our organs with a quaint 19th century device called the stethoscope, and wrote our prescriptions in illegible long hand. And when Obama took office, most of them still kept their patients’ records on paper, in manila folders with multi-colored tabs. Only 17 percent—the early adapters, the tech-savviest—relied on electronic health records.
Now, doctors spend many of their working hours in front of a computer screen. And they aren’t happy about it.
In principal, computerization could be a good thing. For years, the consensus of the experts was that health care lagged unconscionably behind other parts of the economy when it came to computerization and electronic records were seen as a crucial element in any plan to tame the health care monster swallowing our economy. To make health care better, cheaper and more accessible we needed to stop paying doctors for the number of things they do, and instead reimburse them for maintaining or restoring health. This could only be done when doctors, hospitals, insurers, nursing homes, psychiatric institutions—and patients themselves—got better at sharing information. And that would happen only when the data flowed electronically.
This cheery flow-chart hasn’t really materialized—not yet at least. And for that, several players—including the Obama administration—are to blame.
“The simple narrative of our age—that computers improve the performance of every industry they touch—turns out to have been magical thinking when it comes to healthcare,” writes Robert Wachter,  a physician who teaches at the University of California.
According to David Brailer, the first chief of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), Prime Minister Tony Blair had bragged to President George W. Bush about a since-failed British health IT initiative and Bush wanted one of his own. His vision, Bush said recently, was, “there’s a car wreck and the EMT takes a tag off the victim, plugs it into the computer and uses his records to make medical decisions.” Brother Jeb has a similarly magical view of health IT. On the campaign trail recently he pointed to his Apple watch as a potential tool in a “consumer-directed model” of health care that he would like to see replace Obamacare. “Five years from now … we’ll be able to guide our own health decisions in a way that will make us healthy … we have to get to a health system and away from a disease system.”
President Bush’s dream only started to flower when Obama started cutting big checks. His first ONC director, the patrician David Blumenthal (brother of Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal) had the idea of giving doctors and hospitals cash to buy electronic health records. Two other health staffers, Ezekiel Emanuel and Bob Kocher, wanted a set of “meaningful use” yardsticks to assure the incentives were properly absorbed. Obama’s transition team saw it as a unique chance to transform health care, according to Wachter in his new book, The Digital Doctor. 
Lots more here:
This is a fascinating long discussion of the issues around the US use of EHRs. In Australia much is different - Australian doctors have adopted the aspects of EHRs that they have found useful and helpful - but much is the same - around external intrusion and compulsion from Government.
Do read this to see just how national systems etc. seem not to have quite done what was hoped for.
It will be time well spent.
David.