Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, February 19, 2018

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 19th February, 2018.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so. Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Seems to have been a pretty quiet week other than the to-ing and fro-ing between the ADHA and the MSIA.
Elsewhere we learn a little more about opt-out and watch the Barnaby saga!
------

Doctor-shopper reforms all but compel GPs to join script exchanges

12 February 2018

NEWS

More than 6000 GPs in Victoria will have to join script exchanges in order to prescribe S8 drugs and benzodiazepines under the state government's real-time prescribing reforms.
The $30 million system — Safe Script — is designed to allow doctors to identify doctor-shoppers and cut deaths from prescription drug misuse.
But it will mean that GPs in the state will be expected to join Medisecure or eRx, a consultation paper released last week confirmed.
-----

Opt-out for My Health Record 011-04150000

This document outlines key information on the My Health Record opt-out record.

On this Page:

Opt-out My Health Records

From mid 2018 every Australian will receive a My Health Record.
The date has not been announced.
Until then, the My Health Record is currently an opt-in system for both individuals and healthcare providers.

How to opt-out

An online opt-out portal will be available for individuals and families when the opt-out period commences. It is not available now.
The My Health Record enquiry line will offer an opt-out service as well.
The Resources page contains a link to the My Health Record enquiry line.
-----

How to opt out of Australia's e-health record scheme

By Allie Coyne on Feb 12, 2018 4:45PM

Get in within three months.

The federal government has released guidance on how Australians will be able opt out of having a personal electronic health record created under the country's My Health Record scheme.
It ends a period of uncertainty for those who have expressed concern about privacy and data sharing in the scheme.
A policy change from opt-in to opt-out e-health records was first mulled in 2015 when the government starting trialling the automatic creation of electronic health records for individuals.
The trials stemmed from poor adoption of e-health records under the formerly-named PCEHR voluntary scheme.
-----

Govt backs Medicare card safety changes

The federal government has accepted 14 recommendations following a review into the reported sale of Medicare card details on the dark web.
Australian Associated Press February 16, 2018 12:41pm
A public awareness campaign to encourage Australians to better protect their Medicare cards is one of 14 recommendations accepted by the federal government.
An independent review found Medicare cards should be retained as a secondary form of proof of ID despite reports last year some numbers were being sold on the dark web.
But it was suggested the Human Services Department undertake a public awareness campaign encouraging people and organisations to better protect their details.
-----

Government to crack down on access to patients’ Medicare numbers

Accelerates shift away from PKI for HPOS
Rohan Pearce (Computerworld) 16 February, 2018 12:44
The government has endorsed the recommendations of a review into health providers’ access to Medicare card numbers.
The government commissioned the review of the Health Professionals Online Services (HPOS) system after revelations that a Tor-protected service was offering to retrieve the Medicare numbers of individuals.
The ‘Medicare Machine’ service on the now-defunct AlphaBay marketplace site offered access to the data in return for a small fee.
-----

'Anything to save them': Medics reveal human cost of our denial

Emma Young
Published: February 15 2018 - 11:48AM
One day in an Australian hospital ward, two men were dying. Both lay in rooms off the same corridor. But their stories unfolded very differently.
The first was 95 years old. He had end-stage diabetes and heart disease. He had collapsed during a heart attack and was taken to hospital unconscious. There was no advanced care directive to indicate how he felt about treatments. His daughter arrived, shocked and distraught, and insisted on all possible treatment.
Doctors did CPR for 45 minutes, "jumping on his chest," breaking his ribs and sternum – as was standard for resuscitation, said Merran Cooper, the junior doctor who was on the wards that day.
"We could not bring him back to life," she said. "After a certain number of times the head physician had to call it – there was no oxygen left in his brain. By that time there were nurses crying."
-----

Major component of Australia's cancer register still without go-live

By Justin Hendry on Feb 14, 2018 1:37PM

Planning will recommence after delivery of first phase.

The replacement of Australia’s outdated bowel screening register remains without a go-live date almost a year after a complex data migration process stalled the original launch.
Australia’s new Telstra-built cancer screening register is a single platform that will replace the paper-based national bowel screening register as well as the eight separate cervical cancer screening registers operated by the states and territories.
Telstra won a $220 million contract to implement and maintain the single national record for the screening of cervical and bowel cancers in May 2016.
The register was first intended to go live in time to support both the national bowel cancer screening program in March 2017 and national cervical screening program in May 2017.
-----

Backlash continues to reverberate following ADHA announcement

Lynne Minion | 13 Feb 2018
It was meant to be another dispatch designed to promote the Australian Digital Health Agency’s collaborative style. But when it dropped a media release last week announcing a new project with the RACGP and the healthcare software industry, the furious fall-out caught the agency by surprise and still shows little sign of abating.

The ADHA-backed project, according to the announcement, was aimed at opening a dialogue between the medical community and software vendors to ensure GP clinical information systems were ultimately fit-for-purpose.

“The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) has announced a new project that will see the college working closely with GPs and software developers to ensure CISs are useable, secure, interoperable, and ultimately fit-for-purpose,” the ADHA’s media release said.

RACGP President Dr Bastian Seidel, who was quoted in the communique, said the project would lead to the development of minimum clinical software functionality requirements.
-----

We are at a fork in the digital health road

Emma Hossack | 13 Feb 2018

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less travelled by,
And that has made all the difference.
                                 — Robert Frost

Rarely has there been a better reason for optimism in our field of digital health. We have a solid, sophisticated health industry sector, the start of professional courses to assist individuals with health literacy and, significantly, I believe with Greg Hunt we have the first Health Minister who properly understands digital health, together with a commitment to realising the value of data.

So where are we now? Why don’t we lead the world in digital health the way we have in med tech? What can we do to capitalise on this perfect opportunity?

Health is byzantine in its complexity: payment policies don’t match desired outcomes, the open data policies promoted by the Productivity Commission’s recent report have yet to become reality and the equilibrium between government and the health software industry is fragile, as recent media suggests.
-----

Is the medical software industry holding us back?

There’s a Dutch theory called ‘De wet van de remmende voorsprong’ which, according to Wikipedia, translates as ‘The law of the handicap of a head start’. The theory suggests that an initial head start by an individual, group or company often results in stagnation due to lack of competition or growth stimuli. This may eventually lead to losing pole position.

General practice was one of the first fully digitalised, more or less paperless, medical disciplines in Australia. The question is, are GP software packages keeping up with the times or is the profession at risk of falling behind and being overtaking by others?

Good job

Overall I am satisfied with the desktop software I use to look after my patients. It does the basics very well such as recording patient demographics and medical history, medication management, printing scripts and investigation referrals.
-----

Blog: Sydney North PHN facilitates a smooth transition to My Health Record

Created on Monday, 12 February 2018
The thought of signing her pharmacy up to My Health Record was ‘a bit daunting’ for Berowra pharmacist Carrie Leung, but with assistance from the Sydney North Primary Healthcare Network (PHN) the process was completed smoothly and successfully.
I was surprised that many elderly people have a My Health Record and at the other end of the spectrum – the children.
We service a fair number of elderly people with dose administration aids and some of them go in and out of hospital quite often. Generally hospitals are quite good at letting us know they are going home, but knowing there is verified information we can get from the hospital is great.
-----
16 February 2018

Cloud patient management systems come of age

Posted by Matthew Galetto
Across our country, thousands of practices, including GPs, specialist and allied health, own and maintain a practice server. The practice server is the powerhouse of the clinic, the primary function of which is to host the clinical and practice management software.
Other critical functions include the hosting of a myriad of add-ons and plugins that connect to, and extract from, the practice management software.
As a secondary function, the practice server often operates as a file server to store business documents, or often as a file repository for incoming faxes. It can also have accounting software installed or be used as an email service for programs such as Microsoft Exchange.
-----

Australia Moves Closer to Nationwide Electronic Health Record as Nation’s Leading Pathology Laboratories Join Initiative

February 12, 2018 By Jude
Doctors’ advocacy organization praises potential of ‘My Health Record’ but voices concerns about functionality, interoperability, and added burden placed on providers
Australia’s goal of implementing a nationwide electronic health record (EHR) system received a major boost when the country’s largest pathology laboratories signed agreements with the Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) to join the project. But the My Health Record system has yet to fully win over providers as the Australian Medical Association (AMA) raises concerns over functionality, interoperability, and the added burden placed on healthcare providers.
ADHA Chief Executive Tim Kelsey praised the addition of pathology and diagnostic organizations to the My Health Record platform. In Australia, pathology laboratory is the term to describe what are called clinical laboratories in the United States.
The largest diagnostic organizations in Australia have now agreed to share their test reports with Australian consumers,” Kelsey said in an ADHA news release. “We are working to deliver a My Health Record for all Australians next year, unless they choose not to have one. Health consumers will benefit from this significant commitment by the pathology industry and their software partners.”
-----

When it comes to patient information, less is sometimes best

12 February 2018
Too much knowledge can harmful, writes Antony Scholefield.
One of the buzz phrases of recent years has been ‘empowering patients’. It’s presumably based on the old chestnut that ‘knowledge is power’ because, at its essence, it gives patients access to health information so they can make informed decisions.
But according to another old adage, ‘a little knowledge is a dangerous thing’ — a wise warning that a small amount of knowledge can mislead people into thinking they are more expert than they really are.
It’s a dilemma that researchers, led by Professor Jane Halliday from the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute in Melbourne, are focusing on.
The team looked at the quantity of information mothers-to-be should be given about antenatal genetic testing in the context that it’s a field that’s set to become cheaper, more precise and more common in the coming years.
-----

Amazon explores medical supplies for US hospitals

Amazon is keen to expand its medical supplies business.
  • Melanie Evans,Laura Stevens
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • 12:32PM February 14, 2018
Amazon.com is pushing to turn its nascent medical-products business into a major supplier to US hospitals and outpatient clinics that could compete with distributors of items ranging from gauze to hip implants.
Amazon has invited hospital executives to its Seattle headquarters on several occasions, most recently late last month, to sound out ideas for expanding its business-to-business marketplace, Amazon Business, into one where hospitals could shop to stock outpatient locations, ­operating suites and emergency rooms, according to hospital ­executives who attended the meetings.
Amazon Business already sells a limited selection of medical supplies, as well as industrial and office goods.
-----
16 February 2018

The insidious cost of old technology

Posted by Jeremy Knibbs
When I first became CEO of a big publishing company, I used to take pride in hanging on to our IT infrastructure for far longer than we depreciated that equipment in our accounts.
I thought at the time: “They’re computers right … what’s the use in updating just to get ones with new chips and smarter screens?” It was a rookie management error. Saving pennies in capital costs, but throwing away pounds in productivity, and in our potential for innovation.
By the time I left this big company to start a small one of my own, I was a technology convert. Not a nut. Just a convert. You have to be careful. You can’t go blindly at it. But if you do your homework, understand what you need and make sensible investment, the pay-off is generally very good.
-----

Virtual cancer cells aid the quest for a cure

Academics from the University of Newcastle and the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) have developed the world’s first virtual platform to host 3D copies of human cancer tissues, revolutionising the way researchers access critical information needed to advance cancer treatment. The Virtual Biobank will digitise and help speed up the process of accessing vital tissue samples donated by patients, which up until now could only be requested through physical biobanks. Each digital cancer sample in the Virtual Biobank is made up of high resolution microscopy images in both 2D and 3D, plus important clinical and molecular information that provides the foundation for virtual research into cancer. “We’ve taken a tiny sample from tumour biopsies stored at the Hunter Cancer Biobank and converted them into a virtual copy, enabling anyone around the world with an internet connection to carry out research from their computers or easily request access to the physical sample they need,” the researchers said. “This process ensures the physical sample remains intact, but a 3D, digital copy with clinical and experimental information is kept online for future use. This is particularly critical for rare cancers, which are hard to study due to a limited number of samples.” The addition of 3D images was made possible by the innovative 3D Tissue Clearing and Lightsheet Microscope Facility (established by the same team in 2016) based at HMRI, which specialises in making tissue samples see-through for cutting-edge 3D microscopy.
-----

Tech to change your 2018 world

From taxi drones to wearables, tech revolution shows no signs of slowing. Here are the top 100 gadgets to impact 2018.
  • From The Deal
  • February 16th, 2018
77 Paper v privacy
My Health Record is a central repository of patient information able to be controlled by the consumer and used by stakeholders. Pathology labs signed up last year, diagnostic imaging providers will link up this year, and governments are working to maximise the connectivity with public hospitals. This year, Australians will be given a three-month period to opt out before their data and records are centralised permanently. With privacy concerns hopefully resolved, governments are banking on savings from less duplication of tests and scans, while health groups expect fewer medication mishaps. In the long term, My Health Record might harness, or be harnessed by, other technological advances to improve patient access. SP
-----

Data breach reporting laws hit Australia with serious implications for businesses

  • Bede Hackney
  • The Australian
  • 1:38PM February 16, 2018
Australia has finally reached a point of maturity when it comes to lawfully disclosing serious breaches of personal and business data, with the long-awaited data breach notification laws coming into effect on February 22.
Under the new laws, all organisations covered by the Australian Privacy Act will be accountable to the Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme.
The news is likely to come as a relief to consumers who have been left in the dark for too long. Companies have swept data breaches under the carpet without significant consequence. These very businesses will now be lawfully obliged to instantly report cases of compromised data.
-----

Mining firm Downer EDI Mining avoids court after agreeing to sanction

NT News
14/02/2018
  • A mining firm has avoided court after NT WorkSafe accepted an enforceable undertaking after two workers loss consciousness after allegedly being exposed to a toxic environment in 2015.
Downer EDI Mining was charged under the Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act in February 2017 and faced one charge contrary to Section 32, failure to comply with a health and safety duty, and one charge contrary to Section 39, failing to preserve an incident site.
The enforceable undertaking is a legally-binding agreement between NT Worksafe and Downer EDI Mining as an alternative to prosecution, and the charges against Downer EDI Mining have been withdrawn.
NT WorkSafe may apply for a court order to enforce compliance and impose financial penalties, as well as commence prosecution for the original alleged contravention, if Downer EDI Mining does not comply with an accepted enforceable undertaking.
-----

Network expert says NBN Co's business model is broken

A prominent network expert and frequent commentator on the national broadband network has described NBN Co's half-yearly results as a "train wreck" and said that there is nothing that can be done to get the company back on the rails.
Writing in InnovationsAus.com, Mark Gregory, associate professor in network engineering at RMIT, said that, increasingly, statements that were made by NBN Co "about performance and progress are little more than fodder for the joke of the day".
Gregory has been a critic of the NBN's multi-technology mix rollout which was adopted after the Coalition Government, under Tony Abbott, came to power in 2013. The plan has been kept in place after Malcolm Turnbull shafted Abbott in late 2015 and took over as prime minister.
-----
  • Updated Feb 12 2018 at 2:40 PM

5G feeds wireless optimism as NBN struggles

A growing number of Australians are looking to faster mobile networks and upcoming 5G to provide their internet service. Shutterstock.com
As NBN talks up its expectations for getting more customers on to faster 50 Mbps plans, a growing number of Australians are fed up waiting for the national network to deliver on their expectations and are looking to faster mobile networks and upcoming 5G to provide their internet service.  
New figures from research firm Telsyte showed that, in the past year, 20 per cent of Australians had decreased the amount of fixed broadband usage, in favour of using their mobile data plan quotas, and almost 30 per cent had needed to tether mobile devices at home to cover for slow or non-working fixed broadband connection either at home or at work.
The figures appear in Telsyte's 2018 digital consumer study and come shortly after another research firm, Venture Insights concluded a co-funded study with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which found that 30 per cent of Australian households that are currently on fixed broadband, could switch to wireless.
-----

NBN Co posts record $2.4 billion loss for first half

NBN Co, the company rolling out Australia's national broadband network, has reported a record loss for both a quarter and a half-year,  with the company losing $1.13 billion for the three months October to December 2017 and running up a $2.4 billion loss for the first six months of financial year 2018.
The latest accounts for the six months to the end of December 2017 were announced on Monday, with the company's chief executive, Bill Morrow, saying that the company was on track for a scheduled end to the rollout by 2020 as laid out earlier.
According to NBN Co, 6.1 million premises are now ready to connect, and there are 3.4 million active services.
-----

No changes to HFC in NBN rollout plan, says Morrow

Despite the fact that a number of suburbs which were marked down to get the national broadband network via HFC cable have had a quiet change of technology, NBN Co head honcho Bill Morrow says that there is no change in the HFC rollout.
At the half-yearly results announcement on Monday, Morrow said the issues with the HFC rollout, which led to the company putting such connections on hold in December last year, were technology-related and would be sorted.
He stressed that HFC was a vital component of the technology mix and it would proceed as indicated after the problems were sorted out.
-----

Up to 40pc of homes may not use the NBN with 5G mobile on way

If it fails to deliver a minimum commercial return, NBN Co will be required to add the project’s tens of billions of debt to the government’s deficit.
  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM February 10, 2018

Anthony Klan

As many as 40 per cent of households may not use the $49 billion National Broadband Network given the looming arrival of 5G mobile broadband technology and the fact that 10 per cent of homes are not expected to connect to the internet.
A survey of 1500 broadband internet users by analyst Venture Insights found that of the 85 per cent who were plugged-in by fibre or copper wire connections, 30 per cent said they would be willing to switch to a wireless service in the next two years.
What we saw was people had doubts over the quality of NBN services and consumers generally are becoming more comfortable with wireless services to access the internet,” said Nigel Pugh, head of consulting at Venture Insights.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Sunday, February 18, 2018

A Few More Details A Gradually Leaking Out On How Not To Get Stuck WIth A myHR.

This appeared last week:

How to opt out of Australia's e-health record scheme

By Allie Coyne on Feb 12, 2018 4:45PM
Get in within three months.
The federal government has released guidance on how Australians will be able opt out of having a personal electronic health record created under the country's My Health Record scheme.
It ends a period of uncertainty for those who have expressed concern about privacy and data sharing in the scheme.
A policy change from opt-in to opt-out e-health records was first mulled in 2015 when the government starting trialling the automatic creation of electronic health records for individuals.
The trials stemmed from poor adoption of e-health records under the formerly-named PCEHR voluntary scheme.
The federal government confirmed it would officially move into a full-scale rollout of opt-out records in its May 2017 budget, following support from the country's states and territories. The underlying strategy was approved in August.
But until now it had not provided clear advice on how individuals could request not to be involved in the scheme.
It had only offered the ability to register on the My Health Record website to receive updates about the process and the forthcoming opt-out period.
The department has now made public an online resource explaining how individuals will be able to opt out of the process in response to a freedom of information application. The resource had previously been blocked to public viewing.
IT consultant and analyst Justin Warren made the request through the Right to Know FOI platform.
The resource - accessible here - confirms there will only be a three-month window for individuals to request to be left out of the scheme.
The start date for this window has not yet been announced. DHS says it will be revealed early this year.
More here at this link:
The official page with the details is here:

Opt-out for My Health Record 011-04150000

This document outlines key information on the My Health Record opt-out record.

On this Page:

Opt-out My Health Records

From mid 2018 every Australian will receive a My Health Record.
The date has not been announced.
Until then, the My Health Record is currently an opt-in system for both individuals and healthcare providers.

How to opt-out

An online opt-out portal will be available for individuals and families when the opt-out period commences. It is not available now.
The My Health Record enquiry line will offer an opt-out service as well.
The Resources page contains a link to the My Health Record enquiry line.

Individuals wanting to opt-out

Currently, there is no ‘wait list’ for individuals to opt out.
The national opt-out period and timing will be announced early next year. Date to be confirmed.
Individuals can get a generic email about the opt out measure: go to the My Health Record website (see Resources page for a link) and scroll down to the Budget announcement information and enter their email address.
Service Officers should advise individuals to visit the My Health Record website (see Resources page for a link) for up-to-date information about the My Health Record system.
The Resources page contains questions and answers about My Health Record privacy concerns.

Individuals who don’t need to opt-out

Individuals don’t need to opt out if they:
  • opted out of getting a record during the 2016 trials
  • cancelled a record
Individuals who currently have a record will not be able to opt out. They must follow the existing cancellation procedure. See Cancel an individual’s My Health Record.

Opting out newborn children

Individuals can only opt out of getting a record for themselves and their children after the opt-out period commences (date has not been announced).
Parents who chose not to get a record for their newborn when submitting registration information before the opt-out period will still have to opt their child out.

Caller concerns

The Resources page contains questions and answers to help Service Officers assist individuals with basic privacy questions and general opt out questions.
Service Officers should warm transfer providers to Tier 2 My Health Record provider line, see My Health Record.

Historical opt-out trial information

An opt-out model of participation for the My Health Record system trialled in North Queensland and Nepean Blue Mountain regions. The trial was completed in 2016.
We do not have information about the outcomes of the trial.
Service Officers should advise individuals to visit the My Health Record website (see Resources page for a link) for up-to-date information about the My Health Record system.
The Resources page contains:
  • questions and answers about My Health Record privacy concerns
  • letters that were sent during the mail out
  • links to the My Health Record website

Cancellation of an individual’s bulk created My Health Record

Individuals who had a My Health Record created for them as part of the opt-out trial can cancel their record at any time, however before they can cancel their record, they must link to their record.
Opt-out trial participants are able to cancel their My Health Record themselves by linking it to their existing MyGov account, entering the record and selecting Cancel My Health Record. See the Procedure Help Individual or parental authorised representative to cancel a My Health Record.
Service Officers can cancel a My Health Record on behalf of an opt-out trial participant through the Admin Portal. See Cancel an individual’s bulk created My Health Record table in Cancel an individual’s My Health Record.
The Resources page contains general opt out information questions and answers, privacy concerns questions and answers, historical opt out trial 2016 information including the letters that were sent during the initial mail out and the transaction reference number and a link to the My Health Record website.

Related links

----- End Extract.
The resources page is basically a FAQ and is also worth browsing. One can only assume the information provided on the official web site is accurate.

One has to feel. reading through all this that there is a gritty determination on the part of the bureaucrats to make it as hard as possible to opt out!

There is also a major question to be answered as to just why you can't have your record deleted once and for all. The only reason I can imagine is Government pigheadedness! Just what right does the Guvmint have to say you can't delete your data from places we know they have a less than perfect record on security? I wonder why no-one has made a fuss about this previously?

My view is that there need to be some hard questions asked of the ADHA as to why this non-deletion rule exists. The myHR of itself contains no primary data so nothing would be lost other than user-contributed data the user presumably wants shot of!

So, if you value your privacy and want to stay out of this scheme read carefully and sign up to be alerted when the opt-out window opens.

Best of luck!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 410 – Results – 18th February, 2018.

Here are the results of the poll.

How Would You Rate The Value For Money Being Delivered By The ADHA To The Australian Community?

Excellent 0% (0)
OK 1% (1)

Neutral 1% (2)

Not Much 52% (78)

Non-Existent 45% (67)

I Have No Idea 1% (2)

Total Votes 150

This is a definitive poll with readers seeing the ADHA as adding very little to no value so far. I wonder what the Board would make of this result?

Any insights welcome as a comment, as usual. For those who are counting there have now been 14,800 comments on the blog . (There a total of 5100 posts).

A really, great turnout of votes!

It must have been an easy question with just 2 not sure what the appropriate answer was.

Again, many, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links – 17th February, 2018

Here are a few I came across last week.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

Tips to tackle the biggest cyber challenge hospitals face: medical device security

Experts from a leading nonprofit ranked device cybersecurity as the single biggest challenge hospital face today.
February 08, 2018 11:40 AM

The ECRI Institute put managing medical device cybersecurity threats at numero uno on its 2018 list of top 10 challenges facing healthcare. 
When dealing with medical device cybersecurity, ECRI’s focus has been largely making sure it provides practical guidance for its member hospitals, Leinonen said.
“We really need to make sure that there are appropriate resources for the healthcare facility to tackle medical device cybersecurity,” ECRI project engineer Juuso Leinonen said. As he sees it, a practical path to reach organizations’ security goals to improve their “security posture” is critical.
When asked what actions health systems could take now to boost medical device security, he didn’t have to think about it.
-----

NHS to offer Skype consultations for new mums affected by mental ill health

8 February 2018
New mums who experience mental ill health are to be given access to consultations through Skype as part of further new investment in perinatal mental healthcare.
NHS England has already committed to investing £365m to improving mental health services for new mothers. But on Monday (5 February), the national body announced a further £23m of funding, with a particular focus on developing community services.
The overall aim is to increase access to perinatal mental healthcare. Plans include four new mother and baby units and the recruitment of over 200 specialist staff, including 21 consultant psychiatrists and more than 100 nurses and therapists.
Claire Murdoch, director of mental health for NHS England, said: “With so many new mums having the joy of motherhood interrupted by mental ill health, improving care, investment and focus on this issue, is crucial.
-----

WhatsApp doc: Legal and practical perspectives of using mobile messaging

DHI Admin
9 February, 2018
With General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in Spring 2018, our guest columnists explore the legal and practical implications of using mobile messengers in the healthcare sector and finding a balance between convenience and compliance.
Research published in BMJ Innovations found a widespread use of WhatsApp for communication between healthcare professionals. According to the study, 97% of surveyed doctors routinely send patient information on instant messenger without consent, despite the fact 68% were concerned about sharing information in this way.
Having reviewed over 100 clinician-led studies, there are clear advantages to using a mobile messenger service like WhatsApp in a clinical setting, such as more efficient spreading of medical knowledge and overcoming inefficient hierarchical barriers within clinical teams.
-----

Trump signs spending bill into law: Here are health IT's biggest wins

HIMSS Senior Director of Congressional Affairs broke down how the massive spending bill will boost telehealth, Medicaid and other crucial health IT needs.
February 09, 2018 12:39 PM

Congressional leaders passed the spending bill last night, after a 5-hour government shutdown. Senate passed the spending bill around 1:45 a.m. with a 71-28 vote, while the House pushed through the legislation at about 5:30 this morning with a 240-186 vote.
The President tweeted that he signed the bill into law at 8:40 this morning.
The shutdown was caused by a one-man protest by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, who opposed adding another $320 billion to the federal budget deficit. Indeed the massive spending bill adds hundreds of billions of dollars for the military, disaster relief and domestic programs.
While budget appropriators will have until Mar. 23 to determine how to specifically dole out the funding, there are a lot of wins for healthcare, according to Samantha Burch, senior director of congressional affairs for HIMSS.
-----

Bill gives providers relief in Meaningful Use, MIPS programs

Published February 09 2018, 5:17pm EST
The budget bill passed by Congress on Friday morning includes several health information technology provisions for which provider organizations generally voiced support.
In particular, it includes changes to the Electronic Health Record Meaningful Use Program designed to reduce burdens on providers and keep more of them in the program. The bill also makes beneficial changes to the MIPS payment program that rewards doctors for quality care and improved outcomes.
Provider trade associations were pleased with much of what they saw in the bill.
“The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 is largely a win for physician practices,” according to the Medical Group Management Association representing larger provider practices. “Reducing burden in the MIPS program, eliminating the unelected Medicare cost-cutting board known as the IPAB and averting a flawed mis-valued code policy that would have resulted in drastic across-the-board payment cuts in 2019 and 2020 are all top MGMA priorities.”
-----

AMIA wants more specificity from FDA decision support guidance

The informatics group says that with big innovation on the horizon it still sees ongoing confusion among developers and clinicians over which CDS and PDS software is considered a "device" and which isn't.
February 07, 201801:27 PM
The American Medical Informatics Association said recent guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical and patient decision support tools is "well-timed to initiate a broad discussion" about the future of CDS and PDS. But AMIA also says there's still a lot to discuss.
Section 3060 of the 21st Century Cures Act calls on FDA to exclude specific functionalities from its definition of medical device – legalese that essentially bars FDA from regulating that software as a device (which would require pre-market review, clinical trials and/or other agency clearances).
Certain of those excluded functionalities describe what is normally understood as clinical decision support and its consumer-facing cousin, patient decision support. But not all CDS/PDS was excluded from the definition of the device by the Cures Act.
-----

24% of physicians can't identify phishing emails: 5 things to know

Written by Julie Spitzer | February 07, 2018 | Print  |
At least 24 percent of physicians couldn't differentiate phishing emails from legitimate ones, according to Media Pro's 2017 State of Privacy and Security Awareness Report.
Media Pro asked 1,009 U.S. healthcare employees about their privacy and security awareness.
Here are five survey insights.
1. About 18 percent of respondents identified phishing emails as legitimate ones —  physicians were three times worse at identifying phishing emails than their non-physician counterparts. The most misidentified email of the four examples presented was an email from a suspicious "from" address containing an image attachment.
-----

HIT Think How University of Utah Health uses IT to treat sepsis faster

Published February 08 2018, 5:50pm EST
A recent success story illustrates the power of IT and a coordinated plan to deal with sepsis at University of Utah Health.
The patient was admitted for hypoxia and fatigue, and by the next day, he had his first fever and registered a modified early warning system (MEWS) score of 8. Sepsis protocol was initiated to alert the rapid response team, and the provider was at the bedside within just seven minutes after the alert. Within 20 minutes, lactate and blood cultures were collected, and fluids and antibiotics were infused in less than an hour. The patient improved over the next few days and was eventually discharged.
This sepsis management success story is just one of many examples of University of Utah Health’s work to improve outcomes and reduce costs. Part of that work has centered on combating sepsis, a leading cause of death in the U.S.—and the most common cause of death among critically ill patients in noncoronary intensive care units. Additionally, sepsis is incredibly expensive for hospitals: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality lists sepsis as the most expensive condition treated in U.S. hospitals, costing nearly $24 billion to treat in 2013.
-----

Electronic Health Records: a “Quadruple Win,” a “Quadruple Failure,” or Simply Time for a Reboot?

Editorial
First Online: 05 February 2018
Michael  Hochman
Download article PDF
Just a decade ago, when paper charts were commonplace in the USA, it seemed that electronic health records (EHRs) were destined to transform the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery, as well as the care experience for patients and clinicians. Few would deny that old fashion paper charts can be awkward to navigate, burdensome to read, poorly amenable for health information exchange, and inadequate for supporting systematic quality improvement. The sentiment that EHRs could solve these problems was pervasive, and many experts predicted that widespread EHR implementation would save billions.1
The reality over the ensuring years has, to put it mildly, not met expectations. According to a 2014 analysis led by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information,2 over 80% of US doctors now use EHRs. Yet, many of the predictions about the benefits of EHRs have yet to materialize to the extent predicted. Though EHRs have facilitated some substantial improvements—the ability for clinicians to access charts from any wired location, electronic transmission of prescriptions, and enhanced tracking of population health measures, to name just a few—they have also resulted in numerous unintended consequences. Noteworthy concerns include egregious medical errors resulting from design glitches3, charting templates filled extensively with meaningless boilerplate, the common practice of pasting old notes4 that makes it difficult to know which documentation is “real,” “alert fatigue”5 due to excessive EHR warnings, and even reduced communication among clinical team members.6
-----

Changes to telehealth reimbursement, Meaningful Use included in House short-term funding proposal  

by Evan Sweeney 

Feb 6, 2018 12:18pm
A short-term funding bill unveiled by the House of Representatives on Monday evening includes legislation that would expand telehealth for Medicare Advantage members and ease Meaningful Use requirements moving forward.
The continuing resolution comes just days before government funding is set to expire, which would trigger another partial shutdown. The bill (PDF) includes the popular CHRONIC Care Act, which expands telehealth benefits for Medicare Advantage members in 2020 and allows accountable care organizations to expand the use of telemedicine.
The joint resolution would also expand access to stroke telemedicine services, allowing providers to be reimbursed for a neurological consult via telehealth. Both bills have received broad bipartisan support from lawmakers pushing to expand access to virtual services.
-----

CHIME Opioid Task Force Launches to Discuss Community Health

The CHIME Opioid Task Force seeks to prevent and treat opioid addiction by harnessing the data and knowledge of healthcare CIOs.

February 02, 2018 - On January 24 and 25, over two dozen healthcare IT leaders gathered in Washington, DC for the first meeting of the CHIME Opioid Task Force. Attendees sought to determine how to best use CHIME members’ expertise and access to critical data to help fight the opioid crisis and improve community health.
The meeting was overseen by Ed Kopetsky, CIO of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford in Palo Alto, and Jim Turnbull, CIO of University of Utah Health in Salt Lake City. Turnbull first introduced the concept in November at the 2017 Fall CIO Forum in San Antonio.
"We need to empower and assist the healthcare community and help them see that there are pathways to success, whether that is eliminating overprescribing of opioids, finding interventions in clinical care or following best treatment practices," Turnbull said. "CHIME members have the data and skills to illuminate what has worked and what hasn't."
-----

Health IT adoption has positive effect on medical outcomes

Published February 07 2018, 7:29am EST
There is a positive association between the adoption of health information technology and its effect on medical outcomes in terms of efficiency or effectiveness.
That’s the conclusion of a new study published this week in the Journal of Medical Internet Research that analyzed the current literature on the subject over the last five years.
Researchers queried the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online by PubMed databases for peer-reviewed publications. Studies from CINAHL and PubMed that defined an HIT intervention and a corresponding effect on medical outcomes stated in terms of efficiency or effectiveness were eligible for selection. Ultimately, 37 studies were chosen out of 3,636 papers for the review.
-----

Texas HIE to Link Social Determinants of Health to Patient EHRs

The pilot project will allow for more holistic patient care by incorporating data on social determinants of health into patient EHRs.

February 05, 2018 - Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas and the state’s health information exchange (HIE) HASA are partnering to launch a pilot project for linking social determinants of health data to patient EHRs.
The two San Antonio-based organizations will enable providers to use a more comprehensive picture of a patient’s health for complete care delivery.
As part of the partnership, Methodist Healthcare Ministries award HASA a $175,000 grant to expand its services to include social determinants of health data that may influence patient health. Using the grant, HASA will integrate social determinant data into its clinical data repository through a cloud-based app.
-----

ACR project to test use of algorithms in cancer screening

Published February 06 2018, 2:51pm EST
A program funded by the Food and Drug Administration has selected an American College of Radiology-supported project in lung cancer screening as one of 11 projects assessing the benefits of real-world evidence to healthcare.
The National Evaluation System for Health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc) has picked the ACR’s Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System, which is intended to standardize lung cancer screening and provide recommendations to manage use of the technology.
Participating with the ACR are Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital as implementation sites; GE Healthcare and Nuance as radiology workflow companies; and Aidence, Enlitic, Infervision and Mindshare Medical as algorithm vendors.
The ACR program intends to use a lung cancer screening registry that will enable data to be captured for quality reporting, a requirement providers will face from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in receiving payment for lung cancer screenings.
-----

KLAS research shows age of users affects perceptions of EHRs

Published February 05 2018, 7:29am EST
Physician dissatisfaction with the performance of their electronic health records systems is not a new phenomenon, but it continues to be a factor in many healthcare organizations and a contributor to physician burnout.
The age of the physician using a records system provides some of the most striking differences in how doctors interact with and like EHRs, according to research by KLAS Enterprises.
A HIT vendor research firm, KLAS in November started studying ways to create a better EHR, inviting 10 organizations to complete a survey and getting results from five. KLAS received responses from physicians within the five organizations.
-----

New venture with Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway worried JPMorgan's healthcare clients, report says

Feb 5, 2018 11:44am
Though there are still few details about the new healthcare venture between Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan, the announcement apparently spooked some healthcare executives enough to call the bank about their concerns.
That includes at least two of the country’s five largest health insurers, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited anonymous sources familiar with the matter. In response, JP Morgan CEO James Dimon personally spoke to some healthcare leaders to assure them that the venture will only serve the three companies’ employees and therefore not compete with them. 
Still, the initial announcement does seem to suggest that venture could eventually expand to reach beyond just the people who work at Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan. The firms said want to “to create solutions that benefit our U.S. employees, their families and, potentially, all Americans."
-----

When it comes to medical records, experts see the potential for Apple to succeed where others have failed

Feb 5, 2018 11:46am
Company’s like Microsoft and Google have tried and failed to improve patient access to health data, but experts say Apple’s attempt could finally do what other consumer tech giants could not.
One big reason Apple could succeed in its medical records venture is because it is tapping into an open interface and using standardized frameworks for data exchange, Ken Mandl, M.D., who directs the Computational Health Informatics Program at Boston Children's Hospital wrote in an op-ed for CNBC.
At the same, far more providers have adopted EHRs compared to a decade ago when GoogleHealth and Microsoft Health Vault came onto the scene. With a nudge from federal policy and EHR certification standards that emphasize APIs, EHR vendors have begun using standardized interfaces to improve mobile access to medical records 
-----

Yale professors say AI will be a ‘powerful tool’ for pathology in a value-based world

Feb 5, 2018 10:15am
A growing body of research shows computer algorithms may soon outperform human pathologists in both accuracy and speed.
But rather than hand their diagnostic keys to machines, two pathology professors from Yale argue that artificial intelligence will emerge as a “powerful tool” that can accurately identify the drug or therapy that will be most beneficial to an individual patient’s disease.
“Should we human pathologists fold our tents and pledge supplication to our computer overlords?” Balazs Acs, M.D., and David Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., wrote in JAMA Oncology. “No, just the opposite; intelligent digital pathology will make us more valuable to patients, providers, and payers."
-----

Healthcare made up 26% of January's data breaches

Written by Julie Spitzer | February 02, 2018 | Print  | Email
Of January's 116 total data breaches, healthcare accounted for 31 of them, or about 26.7 percent, according to the Identity Theft Resource Center's January data breach report.
The ITRC breach list aggregates all data breaches that could result in identity theft reported to media sources or confirmed on notification lists from state governmental agencies.
The single largest incident involved a Jason's Deli restaurant in Texas, where a RAM-scraping malware attack was launched on its point-of-sale terminals at various corporate-owned locations. Nearly 2 million records were compromised in the attack, which began June 8, 2017.
-----

Digital command center for EHR implementation gains efficiencies and saves $100,000

A digital command center can add value and efficiency to an organization’s go-live operations, says a Thomas Jefferson University executive.
February 01, 2018 01:51 PM
There is tremendous irony in the fact that so much of the go-live operations management process is often done on paper. One such example of this is how go-live command centers are managed.
These command centers often are manned by staff who are constantly updating whiteboards, transcribing issues into electronic issue management systems, and manually generating status reports for overall progress. These procedures are cumbersome and add delays into the process of identifying support issues that may be pervasive.
Leveraging technology to record support issues at the point of incident allows an easier input method and an issue to be triaged more quickly. Simple mobile apps and other technology can be used to record these incidents and electronic dashboards can be used to highlight pervasive issues and generate automated status reports of overall system health.
-----
Factors Identified That Impact Physicians IT Adoption
Key facilitators of digital health adoption include resources and training, access to accurate data
FRIDAY, Feb. 2, 2018 (HealthDay News) -- Physicians have considerable concerns about the efficacy and evidence base of health information technology (IT), according to a report published by the American Medical Association (AMA).
Noting that one of the main questions physicians have about digital health is whether it will actually work in practice, researchers from Partners HealthCare Center for Connected Health and the AMA conducted a review to examine the facilitators and barriers to physician adoption of digital health solutions.
According to the report, few papers talked about provider adoption, with only 57 studies out of more than 3,000 papers mentioning provider adoption. Interim results showed that key facilitators of adoption include availability of additional resources and training, access to accurate data, positive impact on quality of care, and evidence base for the digital health solution. Physicians encounter many frustrations every day, and they are unlikely use a digital health solution that is frustrating or logistically challenging. Physicians also highlight concerns about the accuracy and reliability of data in digital health systems. Another concern was how digital health solutions would affect face time with patients.
-----

NLP enables Atrius Health to gain insights from unstructured data

Published February 05 2018, 7:37am EST
Atrius Health, a large multi-specialty ambulatory group practice serving eastern and central Massachusetts, is leveraging natural language processing to tap into a treasure trove of unstructured patient data used to support its value-based care initiatives.
By implementing an NLP platform from Linguamatics, Atrius is able to mine critical clinical information hidden within unstructured text to improve Medicare Advantage reimbursement, streamline accountable care organization reporting and close gaps in care delivery.
“The majority of clinically useful information is unstructured text that includes physician notes and radiology reports, which impacts our patients and our practice,” says Craig Monsen, MD, Atrius Health’s medical director of analytics. “I’d estimate that probably 50 percent to 80 percent is unstructured data.”
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Friday, February 16, 2018

South Australia Again - It Really Seems It Is Getting Political And Messier All At The Same Time.

First we have had the overt political threat to the EPAS.

SA-Best wants EPAS investigated as Xenophon releases health policies

Nick Xenophon is calling for an immediate pause and investigation into the controversial electronic health records system EPAS, among a series of brief SA-Best health policy proposals released this morning.
Bension Siebert @Bension1
The Enterprise Patient Administration System was designed to replace paper with electronic records in public hospitals and health care settings across South Australia, and has been credited with reducing the frequency of medication errors.
However, doctors have repeatedly warned that the system slows down emergency carethreatens patient safety and blows out waiting lists.
Xenophon says he believes e-health records system had caused “too many near-misses” and needed to be investigated.
 “Very serious concerns have been expressed about major operational flaws that risk lives,” Xenophon said in a statement.
“Medical and IT professionals alike have questioned whether the EPAS is fit-for-purpose – or indeed, workable at all.
“SA-Best has serious concerns that the EPAS is failing, and if so, it is failing sick South Australians that so vitally need it to function properly.”
He said the party wanted proof the system was safe and functional.
“From what we are hearing, there have been too many near-misses with EPAS,” said Xenophon.
“Until we have definitive proof the system is operating at 100 per cent functionality, it should be paused and reviewed pending a thorough investigation.”
InDaily last year revealed the cost of the program had blown out from its latest budget by almost $50 million, to $471 million.
“The other concern we have with EPAS is that South Australian taxpayers have already spent over $470 million on EPAS – we need to make sure we are not continuing to throw good money after bad.”
Lots more here:
There is further coverage here:

Xenophon calls for SA’s EPAS to be paused and investigated after complaints from doctors and “near misses”

Lynne Minion | 09 Feb 2018
Former senator turned state party leader Nick Xenophon has called for use of SA Health’s beleaguered Enterprise Patient Administration System to be paused, claiming an investigation into the electronic health record used throughout public hospitals and health care providers was required.

Releasing his SA-Best party’s health policies today, Xenophon said concerns had been raised by clinicians about the safety and functionality of the platform.

“Very serious concerns have been expressed about major operational flaws that risk lives,” Xenophon said in a statement, according to InDaily.

“Medical and IT professionals alike have questioned whether the EPAS is fit-for-purpose – or indeed, workable at all.”
Heaps more here:
And to top it off – with an election looming we have this getting national coverage:

Two separate glitches blacked out Royal Adelaide hospital

  • The Australian
  • 10:08PM February 8, 2018

Andrew Burrell

Parts of the Royal Adelaide Hospital lost power for almost 20 minutes because of two separate software glitches, it has been revealed, as the body that runs the facility admitted it gave inaccurate advice to the state government.
It also emerged today that a technician testing the back-up generators at the $2.4 billion hospital failed to stop the test despite an alarm showing insufficient ­levels in a fuel tank — and this mistake may have contributed to Wednesday’s’s blackout.
South Australian Health Minister Peter Malinauskas said he was “incredibly disappointed” that Celsus, the body responsible for the RAH, had initially given him inaccurate information about the causes of the blackout.
“I have no reason to believe they deliberately provided us with misleading information,” he said, adding the government had sent in its own engineers to work with Celsus to investigate the outage. In his original explanation, Mr Malinauskas said a generator had been working for four hours before it was switched off, which is when a software glitch caused the blackout. But late on Thursday he said the generator stopped working after just 2 ½ into the four-hour test due to low fuel levels.
“Someone should have been aware of the low fuel levels and cancelled the test,” Mr Malinauskas said. Celsus chairman James Bramley said in a statement that the consortium had provided “inaccurate and incomplete” advice to SA Health on the outage.
 “We advised that following regular maintenance of a generator, the software that controls which electricity source is used did not transfer power from the generator back to mains power, leading to an outage,” he said.
Mr Bramley said further investigations revealed there were, in fact, two software faults. “We believe the pump that feeds fuel from the main tank into the smaller day tank that powers the generator did not function as it should have. Because of this, the day tank had insufficient fuel to complete the four-hour maintenance test and automatically switched to return to mains power after 2.52 hours of testing. The second software fault occurred at this point, with the generator unable to return to mains power, resulting in the outage.”
More here:
All one can say it that health – and health IT – will be front and centre at the upcoming election.
Certainly there seems to be more than one contingency plan that needs a close look!
David.