This blog is totally independent, unpaid and has only three major objectives.
The first is to inform readers of news and happenings in the e-Health domain, both here in Australia and world-wide.
The second is to provide commentary on e-Health in Australia and to foster improvement where I can.
The third is to encourage discussion of the matters raised in the blog so hopefully readers can get a balanced view of what is really happening and what successes are being achieved.
Quote Of The Year
Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"
or
H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
What a mess we are seeing with the selection of a presidential candidate by the Democrats in the USA. They are either too old, to left or just useless politically. The sooner a viable candidate emerges who can make some sort of contest out of the November election with Trump the better for all of us I believe.
CORVID-19 seems still to be spreading and where it will all end is not clear at the present. I suspect a further month of watching and observation will be needed.
In the UK things are quiet as we wait to see just what sort of trade deal and other arrangement can be agreed. It won’t be quick!
In Australia we are seeing a combination of climate wars and rort repercussions occupy the parliament while most of us fret about the economy and the virus. Strange times we are in!
Like all the advanced economies, ours has stopped working the way we’re used to. Our obsession with home ownership is a fair part of the problem.
Let’s be clear: I’m a believer in the Great Australian Dream of owning your own home.
But right now, it’s adding to the economic troubles of many countries. I doubt if the preference for home ownership is causing those countries bigger problems than it’s causing us. We have one of the highest rates of household debt to household disposable income (although ours is made to look worse than the others because of our unusual tax breaks for negatively geared property investments).
January saw a rise in home values across every capital city with Sydney and Melbourne leading the charge.
Two former federal treasury secretaries have united in a fresh call to abolish stamp duty in favour of a land tax from which most farming land and all existing home owners would be exempt.
Ken Henry and Martin Parkinson will appear at a conference on Monday at NSW Parliament to discuss federal and state finances, as part of a review being conducted by former Telstra CEO, David Thodey.
Dr Henry says the stamp duties levied by state governments on property purchases create an unfair hurdle for young aspiring homeowners.
Nearly 50,000 people who have had their claims for asylum rejected after arriving by plane are still in Australia awaiting deportation, raising questions over the efficiency of our border controls.
A government backlog is being blamed for the slow progress in tackling the problem, with Labor warning that people smugglers are using the system to exploit illegal workers.
The number of people who have had their claims rejected after arriving by air increased to 46,391 at the end of January, according to government figures that show almost all of them remain in the country.
The long appeals process also means 37,913 of the "plane people" are still waiting for their refugee status to be determined, an increase of more than 1000 over the past month.
Rate cuts tend to make the wealthy wealthier, Reserve Bank research shows.
RBA economists Calvin He and Gianni La Cava studied property markets at a local level to find how monetary policy affected prices. They found areas with higher house prices tended to be more sensitive to changes in monetary policy than those with cheaper ones.
They found that a one-percentage-point cut in rates tended to lift the average-priced property market by 2.3 per cent after two years. But for the cheapest property markets (bottom quarter by price) the impact was only 0.9 per cent, versus an outsized 3.5 per cent change to values in markets in the top quartile.
The result is that “changes in the cash rate alter housing wealth inequality”, the economists concluded. “Lower interest rates increase housing wealth inequality, while higher rates do the opposite. This occurs because expensive areas, which typically have tighter housing supply, are more sensitive to changes in interest rates.”
I was reading yet more about the troubles besetting the rich economies when it struck me: we’d do a lot better if our politicians and their advisers just managed the economy in ways that gave first priority to benefiting the ordinary people who constitute it.
The bleeding obvious, you say? Well, of late, not so you’d notice. Just what we’ve always been doing, the pollies and economists say? Again, not so you’d notice. Too simple? Not if you do it right.
Economics is the study of “the daily business of life” – going to work to earn money, then spending that money. If so, the economy is nothing more than all those who work (paid or unpaid) and consume, which is all of us.
The good news is that Australians do tend to trust each other more than citizens of most other countries. But that is not reflected in Australians’ trust in most public and social institutions.
Everyone in any position of authority wants to talk earnestly about the importance of building trust these days – but with apparently little persuasive effect. Instead it’s become the missing ingredient globally among the key institutions of government, business, media and charities.
That’s primarily because those the survey calls the “informed public” – tertiary educated, top quartile income, 25-64 years old and relatively high consumers of news – increasingly now share the negative sentiments of the mass public in Australia given the handling of the crisis.
The gap between these two groups in Australia narrowed dramatically over three months to February 2020 from a record 23 points to 14, with trust in institutions by the informed public falling from 68 near the end of last year to 59 now. That level is still considerably higher than scepticism evident in the rest of the Australian community, where overall trust languishes at 45 per cent.
The year is 1985. Bob Hawke has stormed into the Lodge with a landslide victory in the 1984 election. On the radio, the British band Dire Straits dominates with its Brothers in Arms album and its hit song Money for Nothing extolling the benefits of being a lead guitarist: That ain't workin' that's the way you do it:/Money for nothin' and your chicks for free. The average Australian home price is somewhere between twice and three times the national average salary.
Sure, interest rates are about to hit the roof and recession is on its way, but for now, at least, the pathway to home ownership for young Aussies (a cohort who will one day face the disparaging epithet of “OK Boomer”) is relatively clear.
Fast-forward three decades. What seemed like an innocent enough and catchy radio tune has turned prophetic. Real wages have risen by about a half, but home values have tripled. It’s Australia 2020, and that’s the way you do it: money for nothing and it’s capital gains tax free.
Today, Australian home values are worth about seven times the average salary. In Melbourne, it’s eight times. In Sydney, it’s more than nine times. And that’s before the latest resurgence in home values.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison has responded to a new poll out today that shows a huge drop in confidence in his government since unprecedented bushfires swept across Australia.
The Australian National University poll of 3000 people found confidence in the PM had also fallen substantially and there was “quite strong disapproval” of the Government’s handling of the bushfires.
“In particular, we found there was disapproval with Prime Minister Scott Morrison,” lead researcher Professor Nicolas Biddle said.
Prof Biddle said confidence with Mr Morrison’s leadership had fallen to 3.92 out of 10 from 5.25 when the same question was asked in June 2019.
“This is a net negative review of the Prime Minister and substantial decline in his popularity,” he said.
Accounting technology giant Xero will head the Australian Securities Exchange's new technology index to be unveiled today, giving investors the chance to invest in the fastest-growing segment of the market in one trade.
The ASX will launch the S&P/ASX All Technology Index or the S&P/ASX All Tech for short, at a ceremony at the exchange in Sydney, with technology minister Karen Andrews and executives from each of the WAAAX stocks (Wisetech, Afterpay, Altium, Appen and Xero) there for the ribbon cutting.
The index will go live from Monday morning and will be a smaller, localised version of the US's Nasdaq composite index.
The executive general manager of listings and issuer services at the ASX, Max Cunningham, said returns from investing in tech have exceeded the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 Index in recent years, and this new index would be seen as highly investable.
Australia will step up its strategic push in the Indo-Pacific with a $1.1bn upgrade to RAAF Base Tindal in the Top End, to fast-track the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter rollout and provide a forward operating base for US aircraft, including strategic bombers.
The announcement, signed off by the national security committee of cabinet last week, marks a significant expansion in the reach of air force capability into the region and signals a more assertive Australia-US posture as China continues to expand its strategic footprint into the region.
The Australian understands that major runway extensions, fuel stockpiles and engineering will be designed to support “Code E” large aircraft, such as US Air Force B-52 strategic bombers and RAAF KC-30 air-to-air refuellers to operate out of one of the country’s most strategically significant airbases, located at Katherine in the Northern Territory.
It will also considerably boost the ability of RAAF and USAF aircraft — including fifth-generation strike fighters — to conduct joint operations and training exercises in the Indo-Pacific.
A record was set this week for the lowest ever recorded yields on US corporate bonds, which means it has never been cheaper for firms to borrow money. This reflects super-tight credit spreads coupled with ultra-low, risk-free rates.
The flipside is that lenders (and investors) have never received worse compensation for the risk of companies (not banks) defaulting on their debts at a time when US corporate (not bank) leverage has climbed to levels that are higher than those observed before the crisis.
As this column has repeatedly warned, credit spreads on high-yield, or sub-investment grade (aka "junk") corporate bonds, and more robustly rated “investment-grade” corporate debt in the US have slumped to below the absurdly low levels last evidenced in the heady days of 2007.
Columnist and academic at the University of Technology Sydney
February 21, 2020 — 12.00am
In the wake of the murders of Hannah Clarke and her three children, we must do more than wring our hands. There is no better time than amid this despair to consider how we can prevent this from happening to one more woman, one more child. It needs a commitment to research, and a wholehearted guarantee from governments at all levels.
Of everyone I’ve spoken to, trying to make sense of the horror, Heather Nancarrow, the chief executive of the Australian National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, proposed the most radical intervention. We’ve known each other for a long time and she’s not given to drama. When any man is transitioning out of a relationship, she says, he should be monitored.
What she means is that during the period of separation, every man must be put on a program with mental health checks and scrutinised for signs of violence to ensure he is making the transition safely and not a risk to women, children or themselves.
Political and international editor for The Sydney Morning Herald
February 21, 2020 — 7.12pm
Scott Morrison ignored the reality of the national bushfire emergency until it became a political problem for him. If he has learned anything, he won't repeat his mistake now with the gathering dangers to the economy.
As we saw during the fires, the people want to be reassured that there is someone in charge, a power greater than themselves. Things may be tough today but it's going to be alright.
Morrison did the exact opposite as the megafires raged. He made excuses for his inaction then snuck out of Australia to take a holiday in Hawaii. He now has a chance to learn from that shocking misjudgment. As economic anxiety rises, he and Josh Frydenberg need to demonstrate that there is someone in charge.
The world's corporate sector borrowed a record $US2.1 trillion ($3.2 trillion) through 2019 as central banks slashed interest rates, prompting warnings much of the debt is of low quality and at growing risk of default especially if the global economy falters.
As ratings agency S&P Global said governments around the world were likely to tap markets for $US8.1 trillion in debt this year, the OECD said the corporate debt sector was expanding dramatically in a development that posed a global financial risk.
The Paris-based think tank said global non-financial corporate debt reached a record $US13.5 trillion at the end of 2019 as last year's fall in global interest rates encouraged businesses to ramp up their borrowing.
But the quality of the corporate bonds issued is falling.
Fifty-one percent of all new investment grade bonds were rated BBB, the lowest investment grade rating.
AC Grayling has been banging on about the crisis in democracy for some time now but insists he’s an optimist when it comes to rescuing a system he warns is easy prey for populists.
“I don’t think that it would take all that much to get the major democracies of the world — like the UK, the US, Australia, India — I don’t think it would take much to get them right,” the British philosopher and commentator says in a phone interview from London.
“(It needs) a relatively modest adjustment, a recalibration of how we operate our democracy to make it genuinely representative.
“We need reform to the electoral system, especially to understanding how important it is that people should feel that their voices are heard, that government doesn’t exist to carry out the wishes of one party, that it’s under a constitutional constraint to act in the interests of everybody.”
Nobody wants to believe it’s true but it’s becoming obvious that investment property as a source of income is fast becoming a mug’s game.
And the more you pay for the apartment or house in the city, the more of a mug’s game it is.
It’s the flip side of a mind-bending acceleration of residential property prices over the past two decades that has now left us with yields (or income from the property expressed as percentage of the property price) that are at unprecedented lows. Yields are better as you move to the city fringe and regional areas, but the majority of investors have their money sunk into buildings in big-city districts.
We already know that cash as an income proposition is hopeless, but the miserably inadequate income to be expected from property is a comparatively new development.
Communities across Australia could benefit from improved integration of digital health.
The Agency is focussed on improving digital health outcomes in Australian communities through the use of technology to deliver better quality healthcare – especially during transition of care, such as from the community to the hospital when medication errors are most likely to occur.
The digital health Communities of Excellence program will create learnings from a fully connected community, which could be replicated across similar communities.
The focus will be on key digital health initiatives such as My Health Record, secure messaging and telehealth.
Two of the communities that will take part in the initiative are Emerald in Queensland and Hedland in WA. The population size, strong local clinical and digital leadership as well as community support make the two communities ideal for this initiative.
My Health Record connections
A key focus for Communities of Excellence is connecting healthcare providers to the national My Health Record system and helping consumers make the best use of it, including understanding the control they have over the security and privacy of their information.
For healthcare providers, the project will develop local clinical case studies that demonstrate how My Health Record delivers the most value to the communities. This might be supporting telehealth consultations, supporting transition of care, or providing timely and accurate information for local care providers for non-residents.
As a consumer, My Health Record lets you control your health information securely, in one place. This means your important health information is available when and where it’s needed, including in an emergency. You can control access to your record and decide what information is added and which healthcare providers can access it.
Healthcare providers like doctors, pathologists, and pharmacists can add a wide range of documents about your health and care to your record. These are known as clinical documents.
A strategy for all Australia
Communities of Excellence is part of the digitally enhanced models of care priority in Australia’s National Digital Health Strategy, which was agreed by all states and territories in 2017.
The program is a collaboration between communities, governments, organisations and healthcare providers to ensure that learnings are achieved before national roll out, where applicable.
The Framework for Action is the implementation plan for the National Digital Health Strategy and details how all those in the digital health ecosystem are working together to help empower people, and those who care for them, with modern digital services and products.
Having selected two small remote towns to be examplars (selection criteria were “The population size, strong local clinical and digital leadership as well as community support make the two communities ideal for this initiative.”) of the program you really wonder what they are smoking.
I may be wrong but I did not know Emerald (pop. 14,000) and Headland (pop. 15,000) (Port Headland I assume) were towns with exceptional digital health skills, community enthusiasm and clinical depth. I wonder has anyone told the good Burgers of these remote spots on the Ozzie map that this is the case?
Instead of this nonsense it might be a good idea to get the #myHealthRecord security and privacy sorted like the Audit Office suggested!
Many patients have a hard time deciphering online test results, leading to unnecessary anxiety, doctors warn on the back of two new studies.
The findings raise questions over the benefits versus risks of giving patients access to their digital pathology reports and highlight the need for test results to be written with patients in mind, they say in JAMA Dermatology.
The warnings come at a time when Australia is encouraging pathology labs to upload their results to patients' My Health Records.
The first study surveyed 225 patients to see how well they understood the diagnosis after reading a pathology report online.
Half of the participants said they used an online patient portal to access health records at least once a month, and another 19% checked weekly.
However, when researchers asked patients to answer a multiple-choice question about their diagnosis, only 12% circled the correct answer, and almost half of them left it blank.
"Misunderstandings around pathology reports can definitely create anxiety for patients that may require additional conversations with their physician to resolve," said senior author Dr Alice Watson, director of quality and safety for the dermatology department at Brigham and Women's in Boston, US.
"As more patients gain online access to their pathologic test result reports, it is important to consider how to optimise these reports to improve comprehension by patients and reduce potentially negative consequences."
The other study surveyed 160 dermatologists about sharing pathology reports online.
Yet another area where the proponents of the #myHealthRecord are an evidence-free zone.
It is clear that patients who have specific chronic diseases can benefit from being able to track their progress or monitor their status – think long term diabetics watching their blood sugars etc. – but as this study shows any report with significant clinical complexity may both confuse and worry many patients – and certainly not have the effect of improving their understanding without additional explanation.
The best situation is that the patient has the result explained by their doctor in a situation where questions can be asked and answers provided at the same time.
Just throwing all the results up into the #myHealthRecord and a week later letting the patient see what may be complex and confusing reports is really another sick joke I believe.
In my view we need careful research done on who and when patients benefit from access to their results without clinician guidance and how they can be supported with explanations etc. if that is sensible.
This is a classic example where a ‘one size fits all’ approach is just wrong and my result in considerable patient anxiety and distress. Let’s see the evidence of safety and utility before pushing all this data up into the #myHealthRecord. For those who want the data I say great – they understand what they are doing. For the rest I am not so sure it is anywhere near a good idea!
The national Health Information Platform programme business case is due to be considered by Cabinet at the end of March.
The Ministry of Health is seeking a multi-year funding model with separate business cases developed to support four tranches of the programme.
The new platform is being developed to enable sharing of patient data and will “assemble a virtual electronic record on an ‘as required’ basis from multiple trusted sources, and provide access to data and services”, eHealthNews.nz previously reported.
"Each tranche will deliver access to health information iteratively starting with core data such as demographics, medications and immunisations,” Ministry group manager digital strategy and investment Darren Douglass says.
“The content of each tranche will be determined through sector engagement and service design and will be informed by prioritising the backlog of demand, understanding what will deliver value and applying learnings from previous tranches.”
If the business case is approved, implementation of tranche one is scheduled to begin in July 2020, with tranche four completed in December 2026.
“The new platform is being developed to enable sharing of patient data and will “assemble a virtual electronic record on an ‘as required’ basis from multiple trusted sources, and provide access to data and services”.
We will never get our huge document pile to be ever 1/10 as useful as this will be if successfully developed and implemented.
Will be worth following progress closely I reckon!
This weekly blog is to explore the larger issues around Digital Health, data security, data privacy, AI / ML. technology, social media and related matters.
I will also try to highlight ADHA Propaganda when I come upon it.
Just so we keep count, the latest Notes from the ADHA Board are dated 6 December, 2018! Secrecy unconstrained! This is really the behaviour of a federal public agency gone rogue – and it just goes on! When you read this it will be near 15 months of radio silence, and worse, while the CEO, COO and the Chief of Staff have gone, still no change. I wonder will things improve at some point – so far seems not?
Note: Appearance here is not to suggest I see any credibility or value in what follows. I will leave it to the reader to decide what is worthwhile and what is not! The point is to let people know what is being said / published that I have come upon.
The tips and traps every doctor and medical student should know
The use of social media by the medical profession is common and growing.
It has changed the way we can communicate with each other and the wider community.
We can now share information, create content, have meaningful social interactions, and collaborate in real-time for professional and personal benefits.
However, social media has the potential to blur the boundaries between private and professional.
There can be immense professional benefits by having an active presence through the proper use of social media, but inappropriate online behaviour has the potential to undermine professional integrity, doctor-patient and doctor-colleague relationships, future employment opportunities, and public trust and confidence in the medical profession.
Communities across Australia could benefit from improved integration of digital health.
The Agency is focussed on improving digital health outcomes in Australian communities through the use of technology to deliver better quality healthcare – especially during transition of care, such as from the community to the hospital when medication errors are most likely to occur.
The digital health Communities of Excellence program will create learnings from a fully connected community, which could be replicated across similar communities.
The focus will be on key digital health initiatives such as My Health Record, secure messaging and telehealth.
Two of the communities that will take part in the initiative are Emerald in Queensland and Hedland in WA. The population size, strong local clinical and digital leadership as well as community support make the two communities ideal for this initiative.
Parliament extends data access powers beyond physical devices.
Queensland has passed new laws that subject cloud-based data to the same information access powers currently used by law enforcement agencies to access physical storage devices.
The Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 passed into law on Thursday, amending the state’s Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 (PPRA).
The bill clarifies existing “access information” powers afforded to police so that “any information accessible on, or via, a storage device” can be lawfully obtained under warrant.
Access information powers allow police to compel individuals to hand over passwords or encryption codes to gain access to and obtain data from electronic devices.
Amid a "sexual health crisis", as evinced by the rising number of STDs, inaccessibility of some kinds of protection is leading some women to cut up latex gloves so they can practise safe sex.
Family Planning Victoria community sexual health educator Natalie Cavallaro believes "dental dams", thin latex barriers for oral or anal sex used to stop the transmission of STIs, aren’t widely available and there is a gap in community knowledge about how and why to use them.
“People often have to make their own by cutting up a condom or cutting up a latex glove and it’s really not fair,” said Ms Cavallaro.
She was part of a team hoping to make safe sex accessible for all at Melbourne’s first weekend-long Sextech Hackathon, a two-and-half day innovation jam where strangers came together to find tech solutions for pressing issues in the sexuality space.
After a lengthy period of consultation and revision, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has issued the Competition and Consumer (Consumer Data Right) Rules (Rules), which came into effect on 6 February 2020.
The Rules set out details of how the consumer data right works, in particular the timeline for implementation and the framework for how individuals can request their consumer data and relevant product data. The Rules are intended to apply across all sectors in which the Consumer Data Right (CDR) will be activated in the future, with specific details for each sector to be set out in schedules (the Rules currently only contain specific details for open banking, in Schedule 3).
The introduction of the Rules means that the NAB, CBA, ANZ and Westpac (the ‘Big Four’ major banks) are now legally required to share product reference data with accredited data recipients, as well as giving legislative force to the proposed timeline for the commencement of consumer data sharing from 1 July 2020.
The Treasurer has directed the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to undertake two new inquiries. The inquiries form part of the Government’s response to the ACCC’s Final Report to the Digital Platforms Inquiry (DPI) (DPI Final Report), in support of the ACCC’s digital platforms agenda. The inquiries - announced over the weekend – are as follows:
The Digital Advertising Services Inquiry(DAS Inquiry) – will review, over an 18 month period, digital advertising technology services and digital agency services, arising from recommendation 5 in the ACCC’s DPI Final Report (to inquire into the supply of ad tech services and advertising agencies).
The Digital Platforms Services Inquiry(DPS Inquiry) – will review, over a five year period, digital platform services, digital advertising services by digital platforms and data practices by digital platforms and data brokers. The DPS Inquiry arises from recommendation 4 of the ACCC’s DPI Final Report (to proactively monitor, investigate and enforce issues in digital markets).
The new Digital Platforms Branch will conduct the inquiries, continuing the ACCC’s focus on digital platforms, technology and advertising. It also reflects an increasing use of compulsory notices by the ACCC beyond its enforcement role of investigating suspected breaches of the competition law.
Mark Zuckerberg is playing matchmaker with digital singles. Facebook Dating, which officially launched in the US in September, is now in 20 countries, with Australia cited as a potential market.
Concerns about data privacy thwarted its launch in Europe last Thursday — the day before Valentine’s day. Facebook postponed it after the Irish Data Protection Commission learned that the social media giant failed to conduct a data processing impact assessment, The Wall Street Journal reported. Facebook told the newspaper it had completed the assessment when requested.
Facebook Dating takes a different approach to other online relationship services, particularly the popular Tinder, which raked in a reported $US1.2bn ($1.78bn) in revenue last year for parent company The Match Group.
Facebook says it aims to help users start meaningful relationships through things they have in common — declared interests, events and groups.
In a week to forget for the local technology sector, the Australian Stock Exchange is set to launch Australia’s answer to the NASDAQ index - the S&P/ASX All Technology Index - on Friday.
With the massive rise of Exchange Traded Funds that create funds based on indices, the new index has already prompted at least one local operator, Betashares, to plan a new ETF on the back of the “product”.
The new index will carry what the ASX is hoping will be Australia’s biggest and most widely defined technology offerings, with companies as diverse as Appen and Carsales expected to be included. Industry analysts suggest that if the index had been up and running since the beginning of 2019, it could have returned investors roughly twice the returns of the broader ASX 200.
The local exchange already has a scattering of technology related indices reflecting an early period of categorisation, most notably the information technology index, but it is understood the ASX wants to create a mid-to-large cap index that will get global attention from both investors and ETF producers.
My Health Record is an online summary of your key health information. Come into the library to find out about your record and how it can be securely viewed online from anywhere at anytime!
Police have pledged to begin naming and shaming technology giants if they fail to help investigators, as law enforcement chiefs launch a fresh push for tougher anti-encryption laws to tackle the scourge of child sexual abuse.
In a move set to reopen a war between government and the tech sector, Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw, AUSTRAC head Nicole Rose and Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission chief Mike Phelan used a joint appearance at the National Press Club to say police were hamstrung by powers not keeping up with technology.
Top four digital transformation trends in healthcare
Feb 14th 2020
Remember the days when health care delivery was confined to the four walls of the hospital and involved lengthy hospital stays?
Doctors and nurses often suffered “alarm fatigue” from pagers and paper was used to record patient health data and stored in overflowing storage departments, with clinicians spending valuable time deciphering hand-written clinical notes – when they could find them. And hospital leaders made critical operational decisions based on observations walking the floors.
Thankfully that’s a bygone era – or at least it’s getting there.
Driven by the need for a better patient experience, healthcare has experienced a huge shift and like other industries such as banking and retail, digital transformation in healthcare isn’t slowing down. As costly chronic care needs continue to grow and exert considerable pressure on health systems, and patients become more involved in managing their health using IT solutions, the future of the healthcare industry will centre on digitally-enabled models of care. So clinicians can care for patients, improve outcomes and save lives.
London: Britain has introduced a plan that would give the government more latitude to regulate internet content, as part of an effort to force Facebook, YouTube and other internet giants to do more to police their platforms.
The government said the country's media regulator, known as Ofcom, would take on new responsibilities monitoring internet content and would have the power to issue penalties against companies that do not do enough to combat "harmful and illegal terrorist and child abuse content."
Left unanswered were many details, including what penalties the new regulator would have at its disposal or how it would keep tabs on the billions of pieces of user-generated content that are posted on the social media platforms.
The rapid development of technology has resulted in widespread changes to the way healthcare is delivered, with the emergence of a range of apps and software being used to diagnose and treat diseases. This advancement has resulted in confusion regarding the distinction between software that is to be regulated as a medical device (SaMD) and software which falls outside the ambit of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).
In 2019, the TGA held a consultation focusing on proposed regulatory reforms for SAMD (the Consultation) and recently passed the Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019 (the Amendment). This article explores the impact of the Consultation and the current state of SaMD in Australia.
What is SaMD?
The concept of SaMD involves assessing whether the use of particular software falls within the definition of a ‘medical device’ pursuant to section 41BD of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth). Software which is used in conjunction with physical accessories requires an assessment of the device as a whole, rather than the software on its own or its individual components.
Examples of SaMD include:
smart phone apps that are able to measure the user’s blood glucose levels and calculate insulin doses (in this case, the app, phone and monitoring system are assessed as a whole);
Anthony Mennillo Manager – Claims & Legal Services February 2020
What do you do if your patient or their family/friend start recording a consultation or ward round in the hospital? Is that legal and can you ask them to stop?
These are the questions we have received from practitioners who have been faced with this issue and this article explores the competing considerations and attempts to provide some practical solutions.
The law – privacy
Photos and videos of an individual are treated as personal information under the privacy legislation if taken by a practitioner for clinical purposes. However, the principles do not apply if the photo or video was taken by someone acting in a personal capacity, as the privacy legislation does not apply to individuals.
However, the surveillance devices legislation is applicable to this situation. Most states and territories in Australia have legislation which prohibits the recording (video and/or audio) of private consultations without the consent of each party to that conversation.
If you suspect a data or privacy breach, you need to act quickly to stem that damage and respond to affected parties.
Many organisations also grapple with the question of whether they need to report any privacy or data breach to the regulator.
Based on our work with clients who have suffered a suspected privacy breach and conducted internal investigations, here are our top 10 tips to guarantee that you’re ticking all the right boxes:
The federal government is about to release new laws to encourage bureaucrats to share your data. The changes could fundamentally fuel the remake of government for the better. But should you be concerned?
The 5 tests for safely sharing data include
1. Is the use of the data appropriate?
2. Is the user authorised to access and use the data?
3. Has appropriate and sufficient protection been applied to the data?
4. Is there a disclosure risk in the data itself?
5. Will the results lead to disclosure?
We have all been there.
A parent or close relative passes away, and at a time of grieving, you have to spend days, if not weeks, telling a gaggle of government agencies your dearest has deceased.
You marry and want to change your name. Would it be too hard to have one digital pre-filed form that advises the spaghetti soup of state and federal departments and quangos that need to know your new name?
Or you move homes to a new city in a different state. Could it be possible for all your governmental details to be automatically updated?
The recent cyber attack on Toll Holdings has been described as "crippling" and the "most significant in Australian corporate history".
The lesson for anyone who operates a business reliant on connectivity is that cyber resilience must be treated like the key business risk it is.
Toll Group is still working to get its systems back up online after identifying the malware infecting their systems.
All executives and boards should ask: How can my business recover if it loses access to valuable systems and data, or if the integrity of its systems and data is compromised?
The potential of AI is only just being realized now, the billionaire philanthropist said, with computational power doubling every three and a half months. Along with improvements in handling data, Gates said it's enabling "the ability to synthesize, analyze, see patterns, gain insights and make predictions across many, many more dimensions than a human can comprehend."
Gates said the most exciting part of AI "is how it can help us make sense of complex biological systems and accelerate the discovery of therapeutics to improve health in the poorest countries."
Tech companies don’t have favourite songs, but if they did, they would all pick Radiohead’s Just – “You do it to yourself, you do/ And that’s what really hurts,” they would croon, staring their users dead in the eye. And strictly speaking, they’d be right: many of the worst excesses of the industry are, technically, optional. The world isn’t actually a binary choice between living in a surveillance state and opting out of all technological development since the turn of the millennium. You can opt out – you just have to know how.
Of course, that knowledge is not always easily acquired, nor is it necessarily easy to apply. So a new breed of services has arrived to try to help normal users take control of their digital lives. Companies including Disconnect.Me and Jumbo act as something like a digital concierge for their users, tweaking privacy settings, deleting sensitive data and throwing a spanner into the inner workings of surveillance capitalism.
But there’s a Faustian pact involved: to use the privacy apps to their fullest requires handing them a level of control over your digital life that would be all too easy to abuse – and it’s hard to be certain that any company can be trusted with information that sensitive.
A parliamentary panel, that is reviewing the mandatory data retention laws introduced in 2017, has been told that the legislation goes too far and should be scaled back.
Alice Drury, senior lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, told the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security that the laws retain data for too long, in this case two years.
“What’s at stake here is our ability to go about our lives without feeling like we’re constantly being watched,” Drury said in a statement.
“Under these laws, details of where every single one of us goes, every phone call we make and every single text message we send are stored by private corporations for more than two years.
In its Human Rights and Technology Discussion Paper, the Australian Human Rights Commission has outlined a number of proposed reforms to protect and enhance human rights in the context of new technologies (including AI).
Key takeouts
The Australian Human Rights Commission has made 29 preliminary recommendations to protect and enhance human rights in the context of technological advances (particularly AI), in its Human Rights and Technology Discussion Paper.
The Paper's recommendations broadly concern the need for national direction (including a National Strategy and establishment of an AI Safety Commissioner); regulation of AI-influenced decision making (including legislation requiring the explainability of such decisions); and the need for accessibility (including a commitment by governments to procure technologies that comply with accessibility standards).
The Paper's recommendations are preliminary, and the Commission is seeking submissions by interested parties by Tuesday, 10 March 2019.
There’s a long list of spectacular failures when it comes to making things for old people. This age-transporting suit aims to stop that.
By Will Pavia
·From The Weekend Australian Magazine
February 14, 2020
My head cranes forward and my body is stiff and heavy, as if I’m carrying a load. I’m not quite sure what is behind and around me, and this makes me anxious. Sitting down, I reach backwards with one hand for the chair. Getting up is difficult.
I am in a research laboratory in Boston, a white warehouse space, though to a man in my condition it all looks hazy, uneven and yellow. “That’s not legally blind right now,” says a voice to my right. I try to turn my head, but it’s difficult. “That’s just low vision.” The voice belongs to Joseph Coughlin, director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology AgeLab, an institution established to help humanity prepare for the great gift of growing old. He’s a compact, peppy sort of chap in a bright bow tie, a dark blazer and bright blue trousers. I can’t really see his face.
I’m wearing a contraption that transports you into old age. It is called the Age Gain Now Empathy System, or Agnes for short. Coughlin was pleased with the title because it sounded like the name of a nice old lady. “I was a former defence and US Department of Transportation contractor,” he says. “I love my acronyms.”
The power of decentralised technology such as social media is being used to support individuals and liberal democracies all over the world, even as surveillance states threaten it.
Zuckerberg admits Facebook was slow on Russian disinformation
Helen Warrell, Guy Chazan and Michael Peel
Feb 16, 2020 — 5.35pm
Munich | Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has admitted his company had been slow to understand Russian disinformation campaigns during the last US election, as he appealed to political leaders for more regulation of online content.
Mr Zuckerberg — who was speaking at the Munich Security Conference at the weekend — struck a conciliatory tone, saying that Facebook had embarked on “significantly closer” collaboration with governments, electoral authorities and members of the intelligence community over the past four years, and was taking down more than 1m fake accounts a day.
Social media companies such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have come under pressure to improve their response to hostile states and political groups using their platforms to spread misleading information.
Democratic candidate Joe Biden suggested last month that the laissez-faire approach taken by Facebook to extensive Russian disinformation campaigns ahead of the 2016 US election may have “amounted to collusion” that would “be equal to a criminal offence”.
