Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, May 08, 2025

Dr Mackay Is Making Pretty Good Sense Here I Believe

This appeared last week:

Australia must seize its medical research sovereignty – before it’s too late

It should be easier to commercialise Australian medical research, a key industry figure says.

Fabienne Mackay

5:00 AM May 01, 2025.

As a federal election approaches on May 3, Australians are being asked to decide what kind of future they want. For us, the answer is clear: a sovereign, secure and self-determined Australia must place medical research at the heart of its national ambition, not as a cost but as a catalyst.

Medical research is about national capability. It’s about improving population health, growing new industries, creating high-skilled jobs and building a knowledge economy that will outlast any single election cycle. It’s a matter of sovereignty, of Australia owning its future rather than outsourcing it.

QIMR Berghofer is a Brisbane-based medical research institute established in 1945. Today it is one of Australia’s largest and most prestigious independent institutes, employing more than 1000 staff across 67 laboratories. Our researchers lead internationally recognised work in cancer, infectious diseases, mental health and chronic disorders. QIMR Berghofer is ranked second in Australia and among the top 100 globally for biomedical research, according to the Nature Index – a reflection of our scientific impact and global competitiveness.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, Australian researchers made vital contributions, from vaccine development and antiviral research to public health modelling and genomic surveillance. However, unlike countries such as Britain, Australia lacked the domestic manufacturing capacity, streamlined clinical trial networks and investment readiness to bring a vaccine to market. At QIMR Berghofer, we supported national efforts by testing therapies, conducting genomic sequencing and modelling virus transmission. But without national co-ordination and investment, much of this work couldn’t progress further.

We demonstrated that, when empowered, Australian research delivers global impact. But now, with public investment plateauing and international funding becoming more politicised, the question is not whether we can lead again – it’s whether we’ll retain the ability to.

This is not a plea for handouts, it is a call to ambition. Countries that invest in medical research not only are improving health outcomes, they also are building entire industries – biotech, immunotherapy, precision medicine, mRNA technologies, cellular therapies. These are not abstract ideas. They are multibillion-dollar sectors that are transforming global economies.

The recent decision by the US to reduce funding to overseas research institutions – despite contributing $386m to Australian-based research in 2024 – is a wake-up call. That figure represents about 42 per cent of the annual budget of the Medical Research Endowment Account, Australia’s primary federal research fund within its main health research body, the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Such reliance on foreign support is unsustainable. Sooner or later it will come with strings attached – or disappear altogether. No sovereign nation should build its research future on decisions made offshore.

QIMR Berghofer has not been directly affected by US cuts but the environment is changing. Since January 2025, the new US administration has introduced policies deprioritising foreign funding and diversity initiatives, resulting in temporary freezes, delayed communications and lower cost recovery rates for international institutions.

A new US budget may bring clarity but uncertainty remains. We cannot ignore the risk.

Australia’s economy is among the least diversified in the OECD. We talk often about future industries – but here is one already delivering, already competitive and poised for growth. With the right platform, Australia could develop a globally competitive biomedical industry. We have the talent, infrastructure and breakthroughs. What is needed is national focus and long-term vision.

At QIMR Berghofer, we are developing advanced cellular therapies already being used under the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s Special Access Scheme – a regulatory pathway that allows clinicians to provide unapproved but promising treatments to individual patients when no other options exist. Demand is rising. We are ready to scale. But manufacturing each new therapy still requires individual TGA approval, a slow process that limits the pace at which we can meet demand.

This is not just a clinical challenge, it’s a national opportunity.

Medical research is not a lifeline, it’s an investment with expected returns. It drives technologies, companies, jobs and export markets. It strengthens our health system and boosts productivity. In a country where chronic disease causes nearly 90 per cent of all deaths, this is not just good policy – it’s smart economics.

What’s needed now is a bipartisan commitment to research sovereignty: the ability to set our own priorities, grow our capabilities and build economic strength from our scientific success.

This election is a chance to think bigger, to move beyond the rhetoric of scarcity and commit to ambition. Medical research doesn’t need saving – it can help save us.

Fabienne Mackay is director and chief executive of QIMR Berghofer.

Here is the link:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/australia-must-seize-its-medical-research-sovereignty-before-its-too-late/news-story/31e5f9c5f922d16b3aed4afca49849de

I have to say I find this article pretty compelling!

David.

Wednesday, May 07, 2025

The Heads Of Australia’s Medical Colleges Are Worried About Excess Paperwork.

It seems we are getting close to a crisis point:

This tells the story.

Medical colleges warn of health system breakdown in face of ‘bureaucracy gone mad’

The heads of Australia’s medical colleges are warning our public health systems face a dire future of chronic understaffing, unmanageable workloads and critical threats to patient safety unless bureaucratic overreach is overhauled.

Natasha Robinson

5:59 PM May 02, 2025.

The heads of Australia’s medical colleges are warning our public health systems face a dire future of chronic understaffing, unmanageable workloads and critical threats to patient safety unless bureaucratic overreach is overhauled in favour of proper clinical practice.

The call by the specialist medical college chiefs reflects the magnitude of alarm among clinical leaders at the direction of Australia’s health policy, which across multiple policy fronts is downgrading clinical expertise amid pernicious workplace cultures in hospitals that are seeing an exodus of registrars and senior clinicians from public systems.

Doctors across the gamut of specialties are describing what they say is a profound disconnect between health administrators and clinicians, who are frequently subject to reprisals or hostility if they attempt to raise patient safety concerns or improve systems.

Frontline clinicians who have spoken to The Australian say that many administrators are obsessed with meeting government-set targets – for the likes of elective surgeries and emergency department waiting times – instead of delivering the best care to patients.

The chair of the Council of Presidents of Australia’s Medical Colleges has warned that Australia’s globally top-ranked patient safety status in hospitals is at risk of being lost because clinical expertise and leadership are being disregarded and ignored in favour of politically driven imperatives designed to Band-Aid over widespread dysfunction in the delivery of care.

“We see in failed private companies that when key performance indicators are set with a short-term view, they lead to catastrophic consequences,” clinical professor Sanjay Jeganathan said. “Around the country, we are seeing KPIs in healthcare set with a view to largely wanting a political outcome, for the public to see that there are quick perceived wins being made.

“Whereas when you look at it more closely, the failures in Australia’s healthcare systems are being papered over, and the pursuit of these politically driven measures or outcomes are leading to larger and longer-term problems.

“Really, in each and every jurisdiction around the country that I’m looking at, there is only one source of truth that is being spoken to the politicians, and that is the health bureaucrats. The health bureaucrats are the ones who feed the information to the political masters. And there is no other alternative view that is being heard or listened to.”

Dr Jeganathan’s comments have been backed by the heads of Australia’s most influential individual specialist medical colleges, including the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

The colleges are registering a high level of concern at the issues documented in The Australian’s Life Support series, which is laying bare dysfunctional cultures and administration in public hospitals, triggering unprecedented dissent among clinicians, who are warning of systems breakdowns and a growing flight of skilled staff.

Doctors across the gamut of specialties are describing what they say is a profound disconnect between health administrators and clinicians, who are frequently subject to reprisals or hostility if they attempt to raise patient safety concerns or improve systems.

The medical colleges say the situation is so acute that public hospitals are struggling to hold on to as many as one in five registrars they have trained. Some are leaving medicine entirely.

“These doctors are Australia’s next generation,” said Jennifer Martin, president of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. “To see these doctors that we’ve actually trained and who are so committed to healthcare leaving, is something I’ve never seen before. These colleagues have spent many years training and working long hours and they just can’t imagine that it’s going to be an enjoyable career when they get to be seniors anymore, that’s what people say to me.

“I’ve also never seen senior clinicians leaving the workforce before at the rate we are currently seeing.”

State and territory health ministers are facing a perfect storm of spiralling demand and rising health system costs.

Rather than investing in nurturing a long-term healthcare workforce, they are taking politically expedient shortcuts at every turn, with task-shifting and importing doctors from countries that can scarcely afford to lose them.

The core of the malaise facing public hospitals nationwide is not just the pressures of an ageing population and chronic disease, it is also the rise of administration cultures that have become a force unto themselves.

At the same time, government-led scope-of-practice creep is seeing other professions take over some of the roles of doctors with far less training, while the colleges are being stripped of stewardship of professional standards, including among overseas-trained doctors who are now subject to expedited pathways.

The colleges emphasise they want to work with governments on shoring up long-term health system sustainability.

The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons is now calling on governments to “immediately engage in genuine negotiations … to address the critical issues facing the NSW Health surgical workforce”. It comes as a three-day strike action – the likes of which hasn’t been seen in decades – recently rocked NSW, which has also lost scores of its psychiatry staff specialist workforce, who reached such a point of despair they walked away en masse from the public system.

RACS is asking for a recognition of the importance of clinically led governance, with senior medics meaningfully involved in the highest levels of planning and auditing of surgical care.

“Our surgeons are dedicated to providing the highest standard of care for patients across

NSW Health public hospitals,” said outgoing RACS president Kerin Fielding, an orthopaedic surgeon in rural Wagga Wagga in central western NSW. “However, they cannot continue to do so under the current conditions.

“The system has become very bureaucratic. I think that what’s happened is a bit of, dare I say, bureaucracy gone mad. We are increasingly seeing instances of bureaucratic overreach and planning without senior clinician collaboration escalating during the past year.

“This has significantly affected surgeon work practices, surgical workforce wellbeing, surgical training experiences and patient care.

“It has also resulted in resignations and industrial action across multiple jurisdictions, with well-publicised issues in the ACT and NSW, culminating in actions such as the recent strikes.

“The industrial action reflects the consequences of chronic understaffing, unmanageable workloads and poor working conditions across NSW public hospitals, placing increasing pressure on surgeons and ultimately jeopardising patient safety and care.

“We absolutely want to be part of the solution because, frankly, if we’re not part of it, our members will just leave the public system. The majority of training occurs in the public hospitals ... without us, it would cost governments multiple millions of dollars to support training in Australia, and if we don’t turn these trends around soon, we’ll be in dire straits.”

A recent national survey by the Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation revealed the country was on the verge of a widespread exodus of medicos from public systems.

Associate Professor Fielding described the issues playing out in NSW as a boilover of trends that were occurring in public hospitals around the country.

“The situation is very serious,” she said. “This is really a call to arms that we should work together – the system is under threat.”

The ASMOF survey found that only about 40 per cent of more than 700 doctors surveyed said they intended to stay working in public hospitals nationwide within the next five years.

Only 6 per cent of specialists said administrators managed hospital budgets in line with clinical need, and about a third would not feel comfortable to report patient safety or clinical concerns. Half of all specialists said they had been subjected to retribution or reprisals after reporting concerns.

Almost a quarter said administrators were “highly disrespectful” towards clinicians. Doctors believed management did not understand the frontline work of doctors, rarely listened, and mostly only engaged in token gestures towards staff wellbeing and safe staffing. They said administrators “weaponised the complaints processes” routinely.

The first signs of staff flight from the system by surgeons who had expected to spend their whole career in public hospitals are already being seen. As many as 20 per cent of all registrars do not stay in the public system, or in medicine at all, after finishing their training.

Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists president David Story said doctors’ status was being “downgraded” by governments across multiple domains. Management cultures in public hospitals and health ministries at the same time become “toxic” and characterised by “anti-doctor sentiment”.

Professor Story, a staff anaesthetist at the Austin Hospital in Melbourne and Foundation Chair of Anaesthesia at the University of Melbourne, said the situation in psychiatry in NSW was ultimately a tragedy for patients.

“As one of my anaesthesia colleagues has said: What’s happening to the suicide rate in NSW?’,” Professor Story said. “If you want to look at a dreadful metric, it’s probably going to be that.”

Here is the link:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/medical-colleges-warn-of-health-system-breakdown-in-face-of-bureaucracy-gone-mad/news-story/c6c75b6087fced6a362bf74e448d376b

Right upfront I must say having a measurable suicide rate (or worse) has to be a pretty extreme alert that something is deeply amiss!

I have no direct experience of the present coal-face for working clinicians but all this is sounding pretty grim!

All we can hope for is that some of the “higher-ups” will get onto the problems and solve them! One suicide is one too many for work related stress causes! It goes without saying that some health bureaucrats can be pretty good at generating absolute mountains of un-necessary paperwork. Been there, fought that back!!!

David.

Monday, May 05, 2025

I Am Not Convinced Things Are This Off The Rails – What Do You Think?

This appeared on Sunday:

Opinion

Australia has chosen the Labor way of dependency

If Australians knew the country was at a tipping point, they deliberately chose the tip. Becoming the poor white trash of Asia is now a distinct possibility.

Pru Goward Columnist

May 4, 2025 – 10.24am

By definition, democracies are never wrong. In a compulsory voting system, there can be no doubt that the very decisive election result was intentional. So determined was the electorate to continue the Labor course of the last three years, the opposition leader lost his seat.

No doubt there will be millions of words and hours of effort devoted by the Coalition to working out what went wrong. Many others will critique their performance, their lack of policy effort and their apparent lack of hunger, but what is obvious is that Australia has chosen the Labor way.

If Australians knew the country was at a tipping point, they deliberately chose the tip. Alex Ellinghausen

It cannot have been because the electorate preferred one set of cost-of-living bribes against another; these were much of a muchness and if households really had done their own accounts, I suspect the result would have been more mixed and less decisive.

It cannot have been because the electorate feared the Coalition’s radicalism, because there was none, unless you count the nuclear power proposal, which they failed to explain.

It cannot have been because the electorate considered that the country was at a security and economic tipping point and chose to remain with the party that was demonstrably able to manage the future better. Rather, the government denied the existence of such a tipping point and the only crisis either party was prepared to acknowledge was the cost of living. Yes, the cost of living was an issue, but nowhere near the social and economic crisis of the Great Depression, which was an issue for the one-term Scullin government.

There can be no business, economic or security analyst in the country who will not appreciate the disaster now likely to unfold under an emboldened Labor government.

Becoming the poor white trash of Asia is now a distinct possibility.

There will be more anti-business red and green tape, more industrial changes designed to reduce work effort and the profit share, more effort to appease China and a great deal more government spending on programs that play to cultural differences instead of cultural unity. School curriculums will no doubt need revision to ensure acceptance of Labor’s plan for the future. The rising number of children leaving school unable to read, write or add up is already of great assistance.

Industry super funds, dominated by union officials and former ALP leaders, will seek to exert even greater influence on business investment to ensure consistency with union interests. Which would not matter so much if only unions represented working people.

If, by some remote possibility, Australians knew the country was at a tipping point, they deliberately chose the tip. Becoming the poor white trash of Asia is now a distinct possibility. Australians are clearly very comfortable with government dependency, with little or no interest in who pays for it. The long march of the left through the institutions has finally arrived at its destination. Labor can now argue it is the natural party of government.

Short of a disastrous fall in the Australian dollar and a severe depression, it is hard to see anything changing in the next three years. The slide will continue, but we will be reassured that this can be fixed with more temporary relief measures and investment announcements, which will never result in an additional house, road or cost-effective energy and go back to sleep.

The new Liberal leadership, however bold and brilliant, will not change any of this. In fact, it is likely to be mocked for its efforts if it even starts to tell this story and there are many in its ranks who will argue the party should become more like Labor, but with a leader who has hair and who smiles. Ah yes, those factions will need some work.

“The supine silence of employers, industry groups and investment houses on any of this ... has signalled their acquiescence to the new model.”

It is time for the country’s employers and investors to take the lead. The supine silence of employers, industry groups and investment houses on any of this over the past 30 years has signalled their acquiescence to the new model. They fund university chairs in medical science or metallurgy, but not in economics or political science. What did they expect would happen with a media decreasingly interested in prosperity and more interested in culture wars?

Prime Minister Albanese will see no need to bring the country’s employers and labour movements together to forge a new economic accord for productivity reform. Saturday’s result is enough mandate for him. It is something the owners of capital, to borrow a Marxian concept, must now do for themselves. There needs to be an unrelenting determination to change the story, bring young Australians on a different journey, to demonstrate that national pride is more than winning a cricket match, that there is wealth to be had and a greater fairness in reward for effort. Reliance on the Liberal Party, whose spirit was broken on Saturday night, or their voter base, which is devastated, is no longer an option. Business needs to clean out its leadership, stop apologising for believing in prosperity and do it for itself.

Here is the link:

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/australia-has-chosen-the-labor-way-of-dependency-20250504-p5lwd2

Talk about a poor looser! I would see this editorial as an hysterical over-reaction and that Ms Goward should realise the sky has not fallen! We have survived 3 years of Labor government so I suspect another 3 will not be such a stretch!

The bottom line is that the Goward / Duttonesque way of exploiting the poor and down-trodden for their profit has been called out and balance has been restored to a reasonable balance between work and reward.

Sorry Pru the slaves do not choose to be flogged anymore! She should give up the nasty pills!

I see no evidence of becoming “the poor white trash of Asia” What drivel.

David.

Sunday, May 04, 2025

Please Ignore - Author Confused - Blog Deleted!

AusHealthIT Poll Number 792 – Results – 4 May 2025.

Here are the results of the recent poll.

Do You Have And Use An Apple Watch?

Yes                                                                11 (46%)

No                                                                   8 (33%)

I Have No Idea                                               5 (21%)

Total No. Of Votes: 24

It seems clear there are a lot of Apple watches out there on the basis of this poll! I would not be a Swiss watchmaker for quids!!!

Any insights on the poll are welcome, as a comment, as usual!

Medium voter turnout.  

5 of 24 who answered the poll admitted to not being sure about the answer to the question!

Again, many, many thanks to all those who voted! 

David.

Friday, May 02, 2025

A Webinar That May Be Of Interest:

Here is the information.

Core clinician use cases for a national HIE and related national interoperability initiatives

Date & Time: May 20, 2025 01:00 PM in

Description: A one hour expert webinar looking at how our proposed national Health Information Exchange and key related national interoperability initiatives, such as upgrading the My Health Record and the development and mandating of standards of data sharing for our major software platforms, might directly benefit the day to day operational efficiency of clinicians working at the coal face in our hospitals, general practice and the community.

Webinar Registration

Top of Form

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

Organization

Job Title

Would you like to subscribe to HSD's weekly newsletter?

Would you like to hear more from InterSystems?

Bottom of Form

Information you provide when registering will be shared with the account owner and host and can be used and shared by them in accordance with their Terms and Privacy Policy.

Use this link if interested:

https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_15AmPIacQCy9VIArATsl2Q?mc_cid=17a6aadc2c&mc_eid=4930439b08#/registration

Might be worth a watch.

David.

Thursday, May 01, 2025

It Is Rather A Pity That Politics Gets Played At Such A Venal Level!

We have an election in a few days so it is on for one and all!

12:06 PM Apr 27, 2025

Albanese expands Mediscare campaign

Sarah Ison

Anthony Albanese has sought again to expand the Mediscare campaign to argue Labor is stronger in its defence of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme than the Liberals.

“Despite opposition from the Liberals, universal and affordable access to medicines through the PBS was an idea that survived to become one of our country’s true pillars of strength,” he said.

“Like Medicare, it is part of the Australian story and one of the most meaningful expressions of the fair go that we have.”

In a clear swipe at Donald Trump, Mr Albanese said the PBS would never be on the bargaining table in trade negotiations.

“Let me be really clear to anyone who’s listening or watching or hearing about this in Australia or anywhere else in the world,” he said pointedly.

“(The PBS) is not and never will be on the bargaining table under Labor.”

Mr Albanese used the rally to launch his new 1800MEDICARE policy, which will offer Australians free health advice over the phone and telehealth consults. 

“It has been the honour of my life to serve as your Prime Minister to have the opportunity to make a positive difference and to lead a government that sees a stronger, safer future for Australia in an ever more uncertain world,” he said.

“The biggest risk to that is the alternative. Peter Dutton struggles to keep some of his policy ideas for just three days – but he wants Australians to give him three years.

Sky News host James Morrow says the federal election has become a “debate of personalities”. The federal election campaign has entered its final week with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese exuding confidence as he fights to retain…

“But look past all the flip-flopping, all the reversals, all the contradictions, and you see a pattern emerge. A risky and expensive nuclear policy he doesn’t want to talk about … a defence policy that’s little more than a media release and handouts that disappear after just 12 months.

“These are policies with huge price tags, but the last thing Peter Dutton ever wants to talk about is where he’s going to get the money from.”

Here is the link:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/dutton-to-embark-on-lastminute-teal-seat-blitz/live-coverage/baf69d8e0489f9d6dd5d0fbe4dc0a9e8#/entry/11556743

One wishes they would all grow up!

David.

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

This Sounds Like Real Progress For Those Who Can Benefit From MDMA Therapy!

This appeared last week:

Inside the secretive but growing world of MDMA-led therapy

Shrouded in controversy, tightly regulated but the science far from settled: inside the veiled world of Australia’s legal, cutting-edge, MDMA-led therapy.

Penny Timms

5:00 AM April 25, 2025.

Regan Ballantine can feel the drug working less than an hour after swallowing the pill.

Her mind is already shifting. She isn’t hallucinating. Rather, she is visualising scenes of metaphorical importance. All seem to provide her with an enhanced perspective about her untapped trauma and how to deal with it.

The first scene shows two old-fashioned movie projectors sitting side-by-side. They play films in unison, with the one on the left representing her son, Wesley, and the one on the right representing her. Then, Wesley’s film begins to flicker as if there is a technical error.

Abruptly, Wesley’s film stops.

“It represented these two lives living side-by-side, these two stories of a life, and how his just flickered off and mine just kept going,” Ballantine says.

“It’s such a beautiful metaphor, but there was so much pain around that.”

Ballantine’s son, Wesley, fell to his death at a construction site in Perth in 2017. His death was found later to have been avoidable. It sent Ballantine into an instant state of shock.

“I went to the building site the day after he died and I didn’t shed a tear,” she recalls.

“I felt nothing. I didn’t even cry at his funeral, I gave a eulogy at my own son’s funeral and did not cry. That’s disassociation, it’s compartmentalising. You do it to survive, because if you feel that part you can’t survive.”

She estimates it took 18 months just for the shock of Wesley’s death to wear off. By then, Ballantine was campaigning to get Western Australia’s industrial manslaughter laws changed to hold employers to a higher account for avoidable workplace deaths.

As an advocate, she was smart, calm and composed without being cold; a formula that made her compelling in the eyes of politicians, media and the public. She was someone who commanded attention and respect.

“I was tormented by memories of Wesley. Every time something would remind me of him, my breath would leave my body, I’d almost gasp, that’s how much of a state it put me in.”

It was a big responsibility but her resolve was strong and the cut-through she was able to achieve was remarkable.

Her fight for greater justice took years, bringing her before inquiries and into courtrooms.

When all of that finally ended and the courts made their rulings, and the legislation was changed, and the cameras stopped rolling and people stopped looking, Ballantine did something she hadn’t done in years: she paused. It was then that the weight of all that responsibility and pent-up emotion came crashing down.

“I just fell into an abyss,” Ballantine says. “It was like a lid blew off a pressure cooker.

“Essentially my nervous system was fried, which meant I could not be in the world in the same way. Loud noises, too many people, being too far away from home would all induce anxiety or panic.”

It became clear Ballantine had a profound psychological injury from the shock of Wesley’s death, the years of reliving it and the fight-or-flight response she had experienced for years. She was diagnosed with complex post-traumatic stress disorder.

“I was tormented by memories of Wesley,” she says. “Every time something would remind me of him, my breath would leave my body, I’d almost gasp, that’s how much of a state it put me in. I couldn’t even have photos of him in the house. This emotional derailing would happen multiple times a week.”

As Ballantine’s PTSD intensified, her world shrank. She avoided any potential triggers but the triggers kept growing so her world kept shrinking. At its worst, she was unable to get out of bed for long stretches of time. Holding down a job seemed like a fantasy.

“It was honestly the most terrifying experience,” she says.

“I could no longer control my emotions, and I was in an emotional shutdown response and went into a major depression and could not function. I couldn’t get out of bed, couldn’t shower, couldn’t cook, couldn’t leave the house, was having panic attacks. For the first time, I started taking medication.”

She tried various therapies but nothing took. She even considered checking into a psychiatric facility. Then she came across an article about MDMA-led therapy and how Australia had become the first country in the world effectively to legalise it as a last-line treatment for PTSD.

Regan Ballantine was suffering severe PTSD when the new treatment became available. Here, she speaks to the experience.

The more she read, the more compelled she became. She discussed it with her medical team and was assessed and approved to receive it at one of the nation’s accredited facilities.

In Australia it is legal to use MDMA as a treatment tool for PTSD. Psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in magic mushrooms, can be used for treatment-resistant depression. However, both drugs must be used only in combination with psychotherapy under tight restrictions and only a selection of trained and approved psychiatrists can prescribe them.

One clinician who oversees MDMA-led therapy in Australia describes the therapies as “the biggest step forward” he has witnessed in his 30-year psychiatry career. That’s based on the results he is seeing with patients.

But doubts and concerns remain. Medical groups urge caution, saying there’s too much enthusiasm from too little firm evidence. In the void of information, they fear patients could be harmed.

One psychiatrist tells The Australian there are anecdotal accounts suggesting the therapies are only, potentially, slightly more effective than other treatments, though their costs are considerable.

Data to back claims for or against the long-term results of psychedelic therapy, and who may respond well to them and who will not, is scant and still being gathered.

All of this comes while psychedelic-led therapy is growing. Health insurer Medibank Private recently announced it was funding a clinical study into psychedelic therapy.

The Department of Veterans’ Affairs has confirmed to The Australian it also will fund MDMA and psilocybin-led therapies under strict clinical conditions for ill veterans.

“Where eligibility requirements are met, veterans will not be required to pay upfront for MDMA and psilocybin-assisted treatment which they have been prescribed,” a department spokeswoman says.

“DVA is continuing work to finalise the administrative processes as soon as practicable this year, including necessary governance and safety standards.”

Once that happens, the department says it will begin assessing requests for treatment.

Australia’s drug regulator also is considering amending the Poisons Standard to allow psilocybin to be used also for people in “existential distress” during end-of-life care. Public submissions on the proposal close in late May.

For Ballantine, her experience with psychedelic therapy has been positive and, so far, transformative. But she says it has taken a lot of hard work, reflection and therapy.

“It’s not like you take these medicines and it’s a passive process where you go on this journey and come out healed,” she says. “You get out what you put in.”

Welcome to the complicated, messy, secretive and intriguing world of MDMA-led therapy.

A brief history of MDMA

MDMA originally was intended as an appetite suppressant but it attracted little attention and was shelved for decades until it was rebranded as a tool for psychotherapy in the 1970s.

It also became popular for its off-label recreational misuse, which happened to coincide with a cultural uprising and the US war on drugs, leading to the effective global banning of MDMA in 1985 when governments decided it served no medical purpose and easily could be abused. It was then added to the UN’s International Convention on Psychotropic Substances, cementing its status as little more than a party drug.

However, as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance, the drug could be used in limited clinical research, mostly for PTSD though it was tested for other conditions including anxiety, with limited effect.

Its use also has been growing in the fraught underground “wellness” scene. There, unauthorised and self-titled “therapists” have been offering services to paying customers who are desperate for help.

It was a topic canvassed in the 2024 memoir Sassafras by Australian author and researcher Rebecca Huntley, who spoke highly of her experience towards healing from childhood rejection and judgment.

Then there is the much-hyped memoir The Tell by venture capitalist Amy Griffin. The book details the author’s experience of underground MDMA “therapy” in the US. It has been a New York Times bestseller, an Oprah Book Club pick and promoted by the likes of the author’s high-profile associates including actor and celebrity influencer Gwyneth Paltrow.

However, the story leaves you with a resounding sense that the therapy should be delivered only by somebody with the appropriate training.

But what truly threw MDMA-led therapy into the spotlight was a shock decision in 2023 by Australia’s typically conservative drug regulator.

Australia became a global outlier when the Therapeutic Goods Administration went against the advice of medical groups and down-scheduled MDMA to allow it to be used for the treatment of PTSD.

It did the same with psilocybin, allowing it to be used in combination with psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression. It remains illegal to use either of the drugs recreationally or in an unapproved or non-clinical setting.

In the lead-up to its decision, the TGA considered thousands of submissions as well as the advice of an independent expert panel. The panel noted limitations with clinical data but supported the down-scheduling.

The regulator also was heavily lobbied by Mind Medicine Australia, a non-medical advocate of psychedelic medicine. It is also a registered charity. The group tells The Australian it is now the nation’s largest importer of the psychedelic medications.

It is also behind the push to expand the use of psilocybin to the terminally ill.

What is MDMA-led therapy?

MDMA is a drug officially named 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine but is better known by the street names of ecstasy, E, pingers or Molly.

The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre describes it as a stimulant drug known to increase a person’s feelings of empathy, friendliness and social connectedness with others. Street versions sometimes can include other stimulants and hallucinogens.

When used medically in Australia, the pure drug is sourced from a specialist facility in Canada. It arrives under strict security controls and is delivered only to clinics, under guard, shortly before it is provided to the patient. In that briefest of windows between its delivery at a clinic and its use, two clinicians must remain with the medication any time it is not being stored in a bulletproof safe.

The idea of MDMA therapy is that the drug triggers chemical changes in the brain, helping to lower a patient’s defences that may otherwise prevent them from delving too deep into their trauma. Once those barriers come down, therapists will try to achieve a new level of counselling.

For patients who do qualify for it, they typically will have three regular therapy sessions in the lead-up to the first dosing session. They will be told what to expect, discuss their treatment goals and develop a working relationship with two therapists – usually a psychologist and a counsellor – who will remain with them for each individual dosing session. There are typically two or three dosing sessions and each will be overseen by a prescribing psychologist also.

A single dosing session lasts between six and eight hours and must be delivered only in a clinical setting under tight security controls and the drug can be administered only by an approved prescriber who has been cleared by regulators. The patient will be offered two doses of the drug across the course of each session, where they will be guided through intensive therapy while under the influence of MDMA.

Then there’s the music.

“Music is actually a key part of the therapy,” says Michael Winlo, a trained but non-practising doctor and managing director of biotech company Emyria. The company operates several regular clinics and also has been running psychedelic trials and services.

“We have a special service that actually generates a non-repetitive soundscape that is matched to the drug effect. So, we start off with pleasant uplifting music, and then as the drug’s peak happens about an hour and a half into the dosing session we will increase the rhythm and intensity of the music. That helps people go into the experience a bit more deeply. And then we bring people out towards the end of the day as well.”

He says the sessions often are gruelling.

“We’re deliberately trying to confront difficult content that might require revisiting traumatic events or situations or reflecting deeply on broken relationships,” he says.

“But what the medication allows is that the sense of fear diminishes. The trust is there, people feel relaxed and open, and finally can talk about that difficult event, situation, circumstance.

“The medicine’s there to unlock the power of the therapy.”

Dosing sessions are held at least a month apart, with intensive therapy after each. Patients also will experience a comedown effect. They are banned from driving for 48 hours after treatment, must be released into the care of a competent adult and are advised to spend the next few days in a calm environment.

For Ballantine, her second dosing session involved the hardest work.

“I described my second dose as doing 10 rounds with Mike Tyson in a cosmic washing machine,” she says.

“I was literally traversing the terrain of my subconscious and facing some truths about myself, often hidden truths. That’s super challenging.”

She says the drug helped her to revisit past events but to consider them from other perspectives, which made it easier to be able to find new ways to confront and deal with them rather than bury them.

One of the other scenes her mind took her to while on MDMA was of a street lined with full garbage bags. The trash represented her grief, fear, anger and rage.

“Because I hadn’t dealt with it, it was piled up,” she says.

“So, I started taking it out, putting it in the bins. It was about renewal, reprogramming … processing. I started processing the grief and anger. Now I can actually connect to my feelings. This means I can actually take the rubbish out and process my feelings rather than just bury them.”

The controversy

When drugs are even partially legalised, it can lead to a spike in their recreational use and subsequent harm. MDMA has a well-documented history of harm, including overdose and death.

One of the groups most critical of the TGA’s rescheduling decision has been the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. It had advised the TGA against the move, saying that while promising evidence was emerging about the role of psychedelics in treatment, the trials were significantly limited and the results still in development.

It urged the TGA to keep the drugs restricted to authorised trials to allow evidence to keep building, but the regulator chose otherwise.

To add salt to the wound, the college then was tasked with developing the industry’s clinical guidelines.

“It is a very cautious set of guidelines and that’s for good reason,” says Richard Harvey, a practising psychiatrist who chaired the college’s psychedelic-assisted therapy steering group.

“This is a treatment where we don’t have convincing evidence that it’s effective. It is an incredibly expensive therapy and we remain very cautious.”

Harvey says he has spoken to several clinicians who are delivering psychedelic therapy in Australia and he worries the positives are being over-hyped, instilling unrealistic expectations in patients.

“What I hear, and this is absolutely anecdotal, is that these treatments are almost no different to any other treatment we have in psychiatry,” he says. “Typically, 30 to 40 per cent of patients might see some benefit, 30 to 40 per cent of patients experience not much at all and get no benefit, and 30 to 40 per cent of patients experience some sort of adverse experience.”

Those anecdotal accounts make him worried, given the treatment’s hefty price tag. The cost of MDMA-led therapy sits at about $30,000, putting it out of reach of many people unless they can secure financial support elsewhere or be part of a clinical trial.

Harvey points to the US, where in 2024 the drug regulator rejected legalising MDMA for therapy because, unlike the TGA, it said human trials did not prove MDMA’s efficacy and it ruled there was not enough clinical data to outweigh the potential harms of the drug.

“They have raised concerns that we also identified, which is partly around what we call allegiance bias,” Harvey says.

“So, the people wanting to do these therapies – the psychiatrists and psychologists – are often very positive about those treatments.

“Patients are often very desperate and have enormous expectations that this is going to be the miracle treatment, partly because of what they read from the people that provide the treatment. It sort of sets up an environment where people can be harmed. And that’s not only harm from the medication but harmed financially.”

One of the problems with clinical trials for psychedelics is that, even in blind studies, it is apparent to everyone who has taken a mind-altering substance and who has not. That runs the risk of skewing results. The most comprehensive trials also have included intense psychotherapy rather than relying on the drugs alone. Sample sizes and study durations generally have been quite limited also.

Harvey is not vehemently against the therapies but he would like to see more evidence they work, are safe and are worth the significant financial outlay and staffing required to deliver them, especially amid a shortage of mental health workers.

Paul Fitzgerald is head of the Australian National University school of medicine and psychology and is a qualified psychiatrist. His research interests include PTSD and depression as well as psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy.

“I think in some of the trials it looked a little bit better than (the success rate suggested by Harvey). But, given the limitations we have in terms of the trials, I just don’t think we really know the results yet,” Fitzgerald says.

He is collecting real-world clinical data through a project he is running through ANU, though he says it will take time to develop a clear picture of things.

“One of the very big unanswered questions here is, how much of these treatments is a one-off; do you do the therapy and then it has benefits for years? Or is this something, like most other treatments in psychiatry, where the condition is going to come back again and patients will require further rounds of treatment? That’s a really critical but at this stage unanswered question.”

It is a question he is working hard to answer.

In March 2025, private health insurer Medibank Private announced it would invest $50m across the next five years into mental health support. A portion of that will fund a psychotherapy program for eligible patients to analyse their clinical outcomes. Information from that trial will be fed back to the database being run by Fitzgerald.

“We’re certainly seeing in the very preliminary analysis that patients are responding to these treatments, having substantial reductions in their PTSD,” he says.

“What we don’t have yet is the sort of longer-term follow-up to see how long those benefits last. And what we also don’t have yet is some of the data we’re hoping to get, in terms of the collaboration with Medibank Private, which is how these treatments look in terms of cost effectiveness.

“We need to understand whether that upfront cost pays off over time, including through a reduction in the necessity of other treatments and increasing people’s ability to get back into a productive lifestyle.”

The support

Supporters point to limited but seemingly encouraging clinical data.

However, these therapies certainly are not for everyone. They are not appropriate for people with certain medical and psychiatric disorders or those taking particular medications. Even patients taking antidepressants will need to wean off their medication before being allowed to take these drugs.

The therapy also is not advised for people who have taken the drugs recreationally.

Many of those working with psychedelics describe the drugs as last-line treatments for people who often are unable to live their lives well and who don’t have other options.

Winlo says when the therapies do work, small changes can happen quickly.

“Often, the steps start small because we’re dealing with people who’ve been really severely disabled by their mental health condition, in some cases for many years,” he says.

“Patients will turn up the next morning wearing colours for the first time in years. Or say: ‘I’m going to cook for myself today’, or ‘I took out the garbage’.

“These small steps are the building blocks where we help people back into their lives.”

While the pool of patients treated with the therapies is still somewhat small, Winlo says his team has tracked the progress of all of them and he is not aware of any who have returned to taking medications to treat their mood disorders.

Jon Laugharne is a psychiatrist based in Perth who oversees MDMA-led therapies alongside Winlo. He is also the group’s psychedelics prescriber and says so far the clinic has prescribed MDMA to more than 20 patients.

“Having worked in psychiatry for 30 plus years, this is the biggest step forward that I’ve seen in my working career,” Laugharne says.

“The idea is that it makes the brain very neuroplastic for days, if not weeks, and it creates this opportunity. What we’re seeing with patients is new ideas and perspectives, they have new ways of seeing the world and their experiences start to land very quickly in the integration session, sometimes even on the dosing day.

“Some people say: ‘I’m finding new rooms in my mind and new doors to walk through that I didn’t realise were there.’ ”

Results from the clinic also are fed back to the national database at ANU. Laugharne says the clinic has data from the first patients treated with the therapies a little more than a year ago and most are continuing to show improvements.

He understands, to an extent, the reservations about psychedelic therapy. But Laugharne argues the regulations in place mean there are plenty of safeguards to protect patients from harm.

“There are always going to be questions,” Laugharne says. “There’s always going to be potential risks and you always want to minimise those. But what do these patients who are really struggling do in the meantime, while we’re waiting for the next study and the next study?”

According to the TGA, there have not been any recorded adverse effects from approved MDMA or psilocybin use since the drugs were down-scheduled.

It has been about eight months since Ballantine received her treatment and she describes herself as being in remission. She also is back at work.

Now, the photographs of Wesley that once were banished painfully from the walls and countertops of her home are back on proud display.

Sure, she still gets triggered. But she says her nervous system is better equipped to cope with those triggers and the challenges life throws at her. She says she also has some new perspectives.

“The anniversary of my son’s death is on January 5 and my birthday is on January 6,” she says. “So, I’m faced with this situation where I can either have that reaction for the rest of my life and just be impacted by this rollercoaster of loss and celebration.

“You get to a fork in the road and it becomes a choice of how you see things.

“I’m just so lucky that I get a birthday. That’s been a lesson for me; I have the gift of life. When you lose a life like that, in a heartbeat, you understand the sanctity of it. I honour my son by honouring my own life and living my life well.”

Here is the link:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/mental-health/inside-the-secretive-but-growing-world-of-mdmaled-therapy/news-story/3cf3f52f12d3c9c2d52b048785b1453c

It is interesting to see how the use of MDMA is evolving and loosing its stigma!

David.