Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Sunday, August 17, 2025

AusHealthIT Poll Number 807 – Results – 17 August 2025.

Here are the results of the recent poll.

Are You Expecting The Upcoming National Economic Summit To Produce Any Useful Outcomes?

Yes                                                                       9 (47%)

No                                                                      10 (53%)

I Have No Idea                                                    0 (0%)

Total No. Of Votes: 19

A very nearly tied vote – with readers not sure who won, but a slight majority seeing a bit of  waste of time coming! It starts Monday!

Any insights on the poll are welcome, as a comment, as usual!

Poor voter turnout – question must have been useless. 

0 of 19 who answered the poll admitted to not being sure about the answer to the question!

Again, many, many thanks to all those who voted! 

David.

Friday, August 15, 2025

This Really Is An Astonishing Australian Success Story! And I Was There When It Started!

This appeared last week:

How ResMed’s Mick Farrell turned a $7b company into a $62b giant

Family business successions are often a disaster. At ResMed, the global sleep device manufacturer, it has proven to be a winning formula.

Michael Smith Health editor

Aug 8, 2025 – 8.02am

When Mick Farrell’s dad, Peter, first invited him to come and work at ResMed, which makes breathing devices for sleep apnoea, he scoffed at the idea. Farrell, an ambitious 26-year-old consultant, was being courted by two US multi-billion dollar companies – med-tech giant Boston Scientific and biotech Genzyme – and he wasn’t interested in working for his father’s start-up, which was worth about $50 million at the time.

“He asked me to come out to San Diego and interview with his company,” recalls Farrell. “I said, ‘No offence, Dad, but your little $50 million start-up … ResMed is it? ... in the seaside hamlet of San Diego?’”

Farrell’s youthful arrogance was met with an expletive-ridden tirade from his father down the phone line. He still won’t repeat it to this day. “I am not going to quote the exact words he said back then, but it was along the lines of: ‘Listen, you arrogant little so-and-so. This is a huge opportunity for you … expletive … expletive.’ ”

But Farrell could be as stubborn as his father, so it was up to his girlfriend, Lisette, to convince him to get on the plane to San Diego and spend Thanksgiving with his dad, and while there meet with a ResMed interviewing committee. His dad wasn’t on the panel.

On the flight over, Farrell was crunching the numbers on ResMed and its potential. “I was sitting on the plane with Lisette and I said to her: ‘This company, this market, this opportunity is huge! My crazy dad is right!’”

Twenty-five years later, and Farrell, now 53, is ResMed’s chief executive. He married Lisette and they have two kids. And as for that little start-up? Well, it’s now a global company worth $63 billion, with customers in 140 countries.

Farrell is telling the ResMed origin story on a recent return visit from San Diego, where he’s lived for the past three decades, to Australia. He is speaking to me from his mum’s house in the northern beachside Sydney suburb of Manly, where he slept the night before on a fold-out bed, along with his portable ResMed CPAP device and mask. The device and mask are used to treat sleep apnoea, which is estimated to afflict almost 1 billion people worldwide.

“In the morning I wake up fired and ready to go,” says Farrell, who’s never one to miss a marketing opportunity. He also refers to some of the company’s 10,000 employees as “ResMedians”.

Farrell, who’s stocky, with a thinning hairline, talks in rapid-fire sentences, and has largely retained his Australian accent. He was born in Seattle but grew up in Sydney, before returning to live in the US.

He’s in Australia this month to see family and meet with investors after delivering a stellar full-year result for the medical device manufacturer. ResMed’s earnings were up almost 40 per cent. He has also been in Sydney to catch some footy, with ResMed a sponsor of the recent British and Irish Lions tour against the Wallabies. “I love Sydney even when it is rainy and cold. At the rugby, the rain was coming in sideways!”

Farrell, whose early career included a stint working for BHP designing water cooling systems for steel production, will have been ResMed’s chief executive for 17 years at the end of this decade. It’s a long time, according to corporate governance experts, but Farrell brushes it off.

“Despite my beautiful hairline I am only 53,” he laughs. “I have a good innings [ahead] to finish this 2030 strategy. I am looking at long-term [succession] plans and working with my fellow board of directors to think about that,” he says. “It is a big question always at public companies.”

“I fell in love with that overlap of science and altruism and the profit motive. I have never looked back.”

— Mick Farrell

The market is happy for the Farrell-lineage to continue for some time yet.

“He’s not that old. We would be pleased to see him stay for at least another five years,” says Andrew Dale, a portfolio manager at ECP Asset Management.

Bell Direct analyst Grady Wulff agrees. “I don’t think he is going anywhere,” says “He’s the person you want at the helm really. He is very hands-on in every division. The ResMed brand is in his DNA. ”


ResMed was started in 1989 by Peter Farrell, a chemical and bioengineer turned entrepreneur. He saw the potential of a new technology then under development by Colin Sullivan at the University of Sydney, which ResMed would acquire and commercialise, to treat sleep-related breathing disorders. He moved the headquarters to California in 1994 after the company outgrew Sydney, but at one stage considered relocating to Texas because the state was “too Democratic” and high-taxing. He never followed through on that threat.

Farrell junior would follow in his father’s footsteps. A first-class honours student at school in Sydney, he too studied to be a chemical engineer at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he had gained a scholarship, before later earning an MBA.

“I fell in love with that overlap of science and altruism and the profit motive. I have never looked back,” says Farrell.

After working for BHP, and a stint as a consultant, Farrell rang his father for career advice, which is when the job offer was made to come into what was then a family business. It was 2000, and despite the tense phone call, Farrell junior eventually joined ResMed, initially in business development and marketing roles, before eventually climbing the ladder to become head of the Americas division.

In 2013, he succeeded his father as the company’s chief executive and is credited with continuing to build the company’s market share and develop the technology in breathing machines, masks and other sleep devices. He has cemented ResMed’s place as one of Australia’s corporate healthcare success stories alongside CSL and Cochlear.

“When I took over ResMed in 2013, it was already a strong company,” says Farrell, but adds that there are distinctions between him and his father in how they operate. “There are very big differences. He was a founder and entrepreneur. I am chairman and chief executive.”

He knows the succession to become ResMed’s chief executive could be painted as blatant nepotism – he is the youngest of three children – but denies this was the case. “In the early days I had to work harder and work longer. I learnt a lot from my dad about what to do in business and ambition.

“He was big about getting as educated as you can, work as hard as you can and take your god-given talents to the world and double them. He saw some talent in me, and he didn’t want it to be wasted.

“From my mother, who was a nurse, I learnt how to make sure that while you are doing all that, you take care of people, your friends, your family, yourself. That balance of intellectual ambition and care and love.”

Resmed founder Peter Farrell saw the potential of the technology under development at the University of Sydney to treat sleep-related breathing disorders, which he acquired and commercialised. Peter Rae

Peter Farrell, who stepped down as ResMed’s chairman in 2023, declined to comment on his son. A company spokeswoman said he no longer does media interviews and is enjoying his time on the golf course.

For a man who makes his living out of those who suffer from insomnia and poor sleep, there’s not much that keeps Farrell junior awake at night. And understandably, because right now he is riding high.

ResMed’s dual-listed shares hit a record $45 on the Australian Securities Exchange last week. During Farrell junior’s tenure, ResMed’s market value has grown from $7 billion to $62 billion.

“ResMed’s market cap growth over his tenure says it all,” says Anna Milne, ​a deputy portfolio manager at Wilson Asset Management. “He has transformed the company in a number of respects. ResMed has shifted from being a primarily hardware-focused CPAP device manufacturer, to a sleep and respiratory care global leader. His focus on technology and data has been ahead of its time.”

If there is something that worries Farrell, it’s technology and cybersecurity threats for ResMed, which has 23 billion nights’ worth of patient medical data in the cloud.

“In California, people fail all the time and get back up again, and people say you are learning.”

— Mick Farrell

He shares an anecdote about a recent meeting he had with technology leader Jensen Huang, Nvidia’s chief executive, who is personally worth $US150 billion from the success of his semiconductor company.

“I was at this small event with 20 CEOs and Jensen arrives with his cool leather jacket, and he is worth a couple of billion dollars more just that morning. You know me, I’m talkative, so I made the mistake of being the one in the group to ask him a question.”

Farrell’s question was about how to engage your board in strategy, but Huang said the premise of his question was wrong. He said it was impossible to have a five-year fixed strategy in a world where artificial intelligence was changing things daily.

What does the future hold for ResMed?

“I realised ResMed isn’t going to be the world leader in machine learning and AI, but we will be the world leader in applying Generative AI in the field of sleep health.”

Technology is where Farrell is focused for ResMed’s future. He’s less concerned about government regulation or the Trump administration’s whipsawing on global tariffs, which has caused headaches for so many multinationals.

He says the regulatory and political upheaval occurring under the Trump presidency is not a problem for ResMed, which he argues is tariff-proof. He says ResMed, which manufactures sleep devices and masks in Australia and Singapore, is protected under an international agreement called the Nairobi Protocol, which guarantees duty-free treatment for products that help people with disabilities.

Still, Trump administration observers would argue that it is remaking the world order in ways that were once unthinkable.

Farrell, a Republican, cites Ronald Reagan as the US president he most admires. He has not met Trump yet, but expects to in his new role as chairman of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, a global trade association.

“I haven’t met Donald himself, but I think it is quite possible over the two years as chairman, I will be shaking hands with the head of the ministries of health in Europe and maybe the president as well.”

Farrell’s sanguine approach to government is a marked difference to his father, who was very outspoken in criticising governments, both in Australia and the United States, over high taxes, excessive regulation and overspending.

It’s not to say that Farrell doesn’t have views. He’s just not as outspoken as his old man. For example, he believes that in Australia, more could be done by politicians to support interactions between industry and universities.

He says ResMed does its best to capitalise on Australia’s innovative talent. “We have our advanced engineering next to our advanced manufacturing here, and we can teach and learn from [our offices in] Singapore and San Diego.

He would also like Australian state and federal governments to be more pro-business. “Support more Peter Farrells! Don’t put artificial caps on research and development or amortisation incentives,” he says. “Other governments aren’t thinking that way and so want to partner, support small companies and entrepreneurial companies.

“In California, people fail all the time and get back up again, and people say you are learning.”


Farrell’s tenure at the top of ResMed hasn’t been without its hitches or challenges. There was a clinical trial failure in 2015 when US regulators ruled that a new form of sleep therapy the company was testing endangered patient lives, sending ResMed plummeting 18 per cent.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted international global supply chains, making it a challenge for ResMed to manufacture and supply customers. Then, governments spanning the US, Singapore, Germany and Australia demanded it supply ventilators to them as it had manufacturing operations in those countries.

There has also been the arrival of new technology, such as wearables and AI, to which the company has had to adapt and capitalise on to keep driving sales.

More recently, the challenge has been the explosion in demand for miracle weight loss drugs such as Ozempic and Mounjaro, often simply known as GLP-1s, which caused a sell-off in the shares of companies such as ResMed. There was some early evidence that those weight loss drugs could also reduce or cure sleep disorders, but this is not proving to be entirely the case.

Farrell has data showing patients going to doctors for weight-loss drugs but also deciding they would address their sleep problems by buying ResMed devices. ResMed’s shares, which are listed on the ASX and the Nasdaq, are now double the price they plunged to in late 2023 on the back of concerns about those weight-loss drugs.

“It might be premature to say they have shrugged off the threat of GLP-1s,” says Wilson Asset Management’s Milne. “This threat remains. But we have come a long way in the last two years, where the hype was at its peak. I believe we are at the very start of the next phase for ResMed, one of customer centricity.”

Getting lucky and staying lucky

Still, unexpected competition and changes in technology are what concern analysts about ResMed’s future, and they, like Milne, are still watching and waiting to see what the full impact of the mass takeup of GLP-1 drugs will be.

In response to those concerns, Farrell likes to quote American business author Jim Collins. “Good luck and bad luck happen to all companies equally, but the successful ones have return on luck,” he says.

A lucky time was when ResMed was able to capitalise on a disastrous product recall by its main rival, Philips, in 2021 due to safety concerns about foam used in one of its products. ResMed swiped Philips’ lost market share as hundreds of millions of devices were recalled, and the gains have been permanent because it has taken Philips years to make the replacement or repair kits.

“We would never have guessed COVID, the supply chain crisis, or GLP-1s,” says Farrell. “We never expected Philips to drop the ball so badly. They have been sent off the field for four years now.”

Farrell is focused on his 2030 strategy, which is to drive high-single digit revenue growth annually, invest 7 per cent of revenue into research and development, and expand ResMed’s sleep offerings by using data to help people battling insomnia. It is also expanding into the fast-growing ventilation and oxygen therapy market.

Farrell’s strategy includes some ambitious targets, which sound like marketing slogans, such as the plan to help 500 million people sleep better. ResMed says 144 million people now use its products, and it has 27 million cloud-connected devices in the market.

ResMed’s investors are backing Farrell and his strategy. “The real strength of a CEO is to take a high-quality business and continue to drive it and improve returns,” says ECP Asset Management’s Dale. “Mick’s been a very good custodian of high-quality assets.”

Bell Direct’s analyst Wulff agrees and sums it up another way. “He has taken what was just a sleep apnoea company into this new monster, which has so many different revenue streams.”

Here is the link:

https://www.afr.com/companies/healthcare-and-fitness/resmed-mick-farrell-cpap-devices-20250724-p5mhm2

A great story of a huge Australian success!

I can remember when Resmed was just an experimental idea being pushed by some friends in the laboratory next to me while I was doing my BSc(Med) in 1970-71.

Rather a pity I did not go and work with them but I had my experiments to do (in my BSc(Med)) and a medical degree to get! Certainly a commercial path not followed – but always watched with interest!

I suspect Resmed has to be the biggest thing ever to come out of Sydney University, as it heads for a market cap. of US 50 Billion

And I was there when it started <grin>!!!

David.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

The Medical Software Industry Association (MSIA) Feel Government Is Hampering Its Efforts….

This appeared a week or so ago.

31 July 2025

Unshackle the medical software industry, MSIA tells Chalmers


By

Staff Writers

The industry is being held back by red tape and a ‘ridiculous burden’ says CEO Emma Hossack.

The Australian medical software industry has warned Treasurer Jim Chalmers ahead of next month’s productivity roundtable to ease the regulatory burden or lose innovation, jobs and profits overseas.

Medical Software Industry Association CEO Emma Hossack said the industry was being held back by red tape.

“The industry standard should be to spend 20% of time working on government approvals and compliance. In the current regulatory environment, it is more like 60% and in some instances as much as 80%,” Ms Hossack said.

“That is a ridiculous burden on the industry.

“The Productivity Commission estimates digital efficiency could save $5 billion a year in public hospital costs alone. That is a conservative number compared to the benefits our industry can provide across the broader medical sector.

“The majority of productivity gains tend to come from technological innovations. We have some incredibly innovative medical software businesses in Australia.

“All we are asking is for the Commonwealth government to release the regulatory shackles.”

The MSIA, which represents about 140 organisations from the medical software industry including Oracle, Telstra Health and Pro Medicus, recently provided a submission on productivity to the new government.

Software from MSIA members provides a range of benefits to the medical sector including reducing duplication of tests and consultations, prevention of the wrong medicines being dispensed, and unnecessary emergency department presentations.

“Without our members, the modern healthcare system doesn’t work,” Ms Hossack said.

“People wouldn’t be able to book an appointment online or medical professionals have quick, easy access to tests and x-ray results.

“We have incredibly talented people in our industry and we want to keep them and their businesses on Australian shores.

“That way they can create more quality jobs here in Australia and increase their growing value to the national economy.

“We look forward to working with the federal government to do our bit in lifting the nation’s productivity levels.”

Here is the link:

https://www.healthservicesdaily.com.au/unshackle-the-medical-software-industry-msia-tells-chalmers/32184

The MSIA claims there ae huge benefits being missed:

17 July 2025

Spend $20m to help save $420m, MSIA tells government


By

Cate Swannell

Time and money is being lost to slow FHIR adoption, but a targeted acceleration program, including an outcomes-based fund, will do wonders.

Here is the link:

https://www.healthservicesdaily.com.au/spend-20m-to-help-save-420m-msia-tells-government/31412

All this sounds wonderful. I wonder if any readers have any concrete examples of such wonderful success to share?

David.

 

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

I Wonder If, In Another 80 Years, Japan Well Still be The Exemplar Of Peace It Is Now?

This appeared last week to remind us all of a pretty dreadful time in History.

Japan at military turning point 80 years after Hiroshima bombing

On the anniversary of the atomic bombings that ended World War II, some Japanese think peace for peace’s sake is no longer enough.

Hannah Beech and Hisako Ueno

Aug 8, 2025 – 4.46pm

There is a Peace Boulevard, a Peace Bell and a Peace Memorial Park.

On a recent summer afternoon, at the Children’s Peace Monument, near the Flame of Peace, elementary school students in cotton hats and crisp uniforms folded origami cranes.

They were honouring a little girl who had tried to overcome the effects of Little Boy, as the atomic bomb used in the world’s first nuclear attack was code-named, by folding a thousand paper birds, a Japanese tradition for good fortune. She died of radiation poisoning anyway.

Hiroshima was bombed by the US military on August 6, 1945, causing the deaths of about 140,000 residents by the end of the year and bringing to a close Japan’s imperial rampage across Asia and the world’s deadliest war.

Today, the Japanese city stands synonymous with peace. From the ashes of nuclear devastation, Hiroshima – along with the city of Nagasaki, which was bombed three days later – was rebuilt and regenerated.

Burned and sickened by radiation, many of Hiroshima’s survivors forgave. They wove pacifism into their DNA, the vanguards of a vanquished nation that cast off decades of imperialism.

Since 1949, when the Peace Memorial City Construction Law was enacted, Hiroshima has hosted conferences, concerts, musicals and mime performances, all in the name of peace.

In 2024, a group representing Japanese atomic bomb survivors was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to honour its campaign to eradicate nuclear weapons.

But 80 years after the world’s only nuclear attacks, Japan is not entirely at peace. Three of its closest neighbours possess nuclear weapons: China, Russia and North Korea. The world at large, from Ukraine to the Gaza Strip, is cleaved by conflict.

In the Pacific, China is flexing its power, just as American influence seems to be waning. Time is running out, too. The last major arms control treaty between the US and Russia is set to lapse early next year.

Japan’s military expansion

Bound by an American-imposed constitution that renounces war and prevents it from having a military except for defensive purposes, Japan is fractured between those who defend pacifism as a national virtue and those who think the country must abandon its submissive stoop.

Even the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize last year felt like an anachronism, a vestige of a time when a world without nuclear weapons could be imagined.

“We are now at a turning point,” said Noriyuki Kawano, the director of the Centre for Peace at Hiroshima University, referring to a growing feeling in Japan, particularly among young people, that peace for peace’s sake is no longer enough. “Hiroshima is Hiroshima, but if Japan is to face reality, Hiroshima may become isolated.”

The survivors of the atomic bombings – August 6 at Hiroshima, and August 9 at Nagasaki – are now 80 years old or more. This anniversary will likely be the last major remembrance to include firsthand accounts of what splitting uranium and plutonium atoms wrought: flayed flesh, irradiated babies, maggot-infested burns and decades of radiation-induced disease.

Even as Hiroshima sells peace-branded mochi treats and hand towels, the nearby port town of Kure exists in counterpoise. Once home to the largest Imperial Navy base and arsenal, Kure is a beneficiary of Japan’s current military expansion.

The country’s largest warship docks here, and a former steelyard is slated to become another naval facility. At a military history museum, origami cranes from Hiroshima’s Peace Memorial Park are recycled into paper fans emblazoned with the Yamato, Japan’s “unsinkable” World War II battleship, which was eventually torpedoed by the Americans.

“People are realising that peace will not come just by praying,” said Masanari Tade, the son of a Hiroshima survivor who died at 50. Like many who suffered, Tade’s father refused official status as an atomic bomb victim because of the stigma attached to those subjected to radiation.

Tade is now the Hiroshima head of Nippon Kaigi, an ultranationalist political bloc that wants to revise the constitutional clause banning a conventional military.

“The lack of peace, the lack of nuclear nonproliferation, in and of itself, this is proof that the symbol of Hiroshima as a peace city has failed,” he said.

The horrifying fallout

Eighty years ago, Chieko Kiriake was a high school student in Hiroshima, drafted to work in war factories, cleaning old guns and military uniforms.

On the hot and cloudless morning of August 6, Kiriake, dressed in a thick army canvas top hanging down to her knees, was cooling off under the eaves of a building, when a searing brightness exploded over Hiroshima at 8:15am. The city went dark.

By the time Kiriake pulled herself out of the wreckage, every landmark she knew in Hiroshima had disintegrated. For days, she tended to fellow students seared by the atomic explosion. One after another, they died. She sifted through their cremated remains, a Japanese ritual. The shards of one friend’s bones shined a soft pink, like early cherry blossoms.

Like most hibakusha, as the atomic bomb survivors are known, Kiriake, now 95, is fervently pro-peace. Some victims hid their trauma and their keloids, the painful scar tissue from burns, for fear that their marriage or job prospects would be diminished. But Kiriake has spent years teaching subsequent generations about the consequences of war and nuclear attacks.

“Hiroshima now values peace above all else, and they say, ‘We must abolish nuclear weapons,’” she said. “But 80 years ago, it was a military capital until the atomic bomb was dropped.”

“Everyone was invaded by militarism,” she added.

Takashi Hiraoka, a former mayor of Hiroshima, is 97 and says he is angry that Japan has never signed the global Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. He reserves special ire for Fumio Kishida, the former prime minister, whose family is from Hiroshima. Kishida supported nuclear disarmament, but in 2022 he signed off on a plan to dramatically increase defence spending.

Japan, Hiraoka said, is “leaning to the right and becoming militaristic”.

Tade, of the ultranationalist bloc, thinks Japan needs to move on from a war that ended 80 years ago – even as others condemn Japan for a lack of contrition for the atrocities committed by its Imperial Armed Forces.

Like other nationalists, some of whom have a growing voice in Japan’s ruling party, Tade dismisses documented war crimes by Japanese forces – from the Nanjing Massacre and the sexual enslavement of women as so-called “comfort women” to biological warfare experiments – as concocted by a Western-supported intelligentsia.

“It’s a Japanese guilt theory, that Japan started the war because it was bad and so it had to suffer damage,” he said. “There is a sad reality, a logic used to justify the bombing.”

US pledge to defend Japan under question

To eradicate Japanese imperialism, the Americans oversaw the drafting of a constitution in which Japan forever renounces war. The United States promised to defend Japan if it came under attack; more than 50,000 American soldiers are still stationed in the country.

The security treaty, which put Japan under the American nuclear umbrella, is a bedrock of the postwar Pacific order and has allowed Japan to promote peace. But the terms of the alliance are being questioned, by both Japanese and American politicians.

Japan’s military is called the Self-Defence Forces, its formation in 1954 hastened by an American wish for Japan to serve as a bulwark against communism prompted by the Korean War. Last year, the Japanese parliament approved a 9.7 per cent increase in the defence budget for this year, bringing Japan’s annual military outlays to about $US57 billion ($87 billion), and on course to rank among the world’s top spenders.

The build-up has come to Kure, the port city neighbouring Hiroshima. This year, it was named the command centre for a maritime transport network serving Japan’s southern islands, including the approach to Taiwan and the South China Sea, two potential flashpoints with China. The 129-hectare steel factory conversion is slated to include an ammunition depot.

The military expansion in Kure has angered some residents, who note that the city was bombed 14 times by the Americans during World War II.

“Revitalising the military industry would be strangling ourselves,” said Takashi Koretsune, a member of a citizens’ group.

The remembrance

Isamu Nakakura, now 100, began his Imperial Navy training at 14 and became a draftsman at Kure, rendering tiny submersibles used at Pearl Harbor.

“We were taught that the Americans were red demons,” he said.

After the war, Nakakura worked with American researchers for 20 years, documenting the uptick in diseases associated with radiation, such as leukemia and breast and lung cancers. While the initial blast of radiation dissipated quickly, victims of the blast suffered from illnesses that sometimes showed up decades later.

Once a designer of war machines, he now frets about the durability of Japan’s pacifism.

“There hasn’t been a very thorough discussion with people who bravely raise their hands for peace diplomacy,” he said. “Peace is not just the absence of war.”

The peace celebrated in Hiroshima suffers from other omissions. The Japanese Empire annexed the Korean Peninsula in 1910, dispossessing many. Landless Koreans laboured in Japan, including about 85,000 in Hiroshima who dug air raid shelters or collected wood for charcoal. Up to 30,000 Koreans died from the atomic bombing on August 6.

“The pain of moving and working here, and then the atomic bomb, this was a double hardship,” said Kwon Joon Oh, whose father survived the detonation but died of lung cancer at 47.

Kiriake, the 95-year-old survivor of the bombing, remembers how no one expected anything to grow again in Hiroshima’s scorched soil. But the next spring, seedlings pushed through the earth. Pink oleander flowers bloomed. Years later, Kiriake planted in her garden a cutting from an oleander tree growing near the point of the bomb’s greatest impact. It blossoms every year.

“I was happy that the plants grew,” she said of the sight of green in a charred city 80 years ago. “I thought, this will be fine, and I will be able to live.”

Here is the link:

https://www.afr.com/world/asia/japan-at-military-turning-point-80-years-after-hiroshima-bombing-20250808-p5mlir

I suspect as memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki fade, and current pressures intrude, a totally peaceful Japan will fade and become a rich and powerful nation with armed forced to match…especially given its proximity to China. I seriously doubt it will take 80 years, 20-30 would be my guess.

The world in evolving and changing and Japan will not stay still – good they see us a close friends and allies. We need all the friends we can find with the increasing rise of China!

David.

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

I Am Not Sure Why We Have Not All Heard More About This Upcoming NBN Upgrade!

This appeared a day or so ago…

The NBN is getting its biggest upgrade ever. Most people have no idea

By David Swan

August 9, 2025 — 5.00am

Fairly or not, Australia’s NBN has long been the butt of jokes. After years of political football and criticisms that the network is subpar compared with global standards – we rank below Nicaragua and Venezuela for download speed – a high percentage of Australians will finally gain affordable access to world-class broadband speeds. The network is quietly getting its biggest ever speed upgrade in about a month, though not all households will benefit.

What’s happening?

From September 14, NBN is ramping up speed tiers for homes and businesses on fixed-line connections, with many plans set to double or triple in speed at no extra cost to consumers. NBN calls the new speeds a “monumental leap forward for the NBN network and Australia”. The upgrade is unrelated to a deal announced on Tuesday for Amazon to deliver NBN satellite broadband.

To be specific (and slightly technical), 100 megabit download plans are going up to 500, 250 megabit plans are going to 750 and 500 megabit plans are going to 1000, with upload speeds also ramping up. These are big jumps and should mean noticeable improvements ... as long as you have the gear to take advantage of them. To compare, when the NBN rollout began in 2011, the average household broadband speed was just 9 megabits per second. By the end of this year more than 10 million homes and businesses will be able to access speeds of up to 2000 megabits per second.

Who’s getting the upgrades?

The NBN uses different types of technology, depending on where you live. If you’re connected to the NBN with fibre to the premises (FTTP) or hybrid fibre coaxial (HFC) technology you can benefit from the upgraded speeds. To check what technology your home is on now, enter your address into the NBN website. Customers on plans below 100 megabits or connected via fibre to the node (FTTN), fibre to the curb (FTTC), fixed wireless or satellite technologies won’t get the upgrades.

Will I need to do anything?

The short answer is no, at least for customers who are already on NBN’s Home Fast, Home Superfast or Home Ultrafast plans and have a router that’s not too old. The upgrades are happening behind the scenes, and no work at your property will be required. Telcos will start automatically increasing the speeds of their plans from mid-September, and most have said they will do so without any extra cost to consumers. If you’re not sure what plan you’re on, you should check: many Australians are on “Home Standard” plans, which are 50 megabits per second and won’t be getting the speed upgrades. You can check with your provider what speed you’re on by looking at your bill or your account details on your provider’s website.

NBN says two-thirds of Australians haven’t upgraded their broadband plans in five years, despite greater demand for data. Upgrading just one speed tier could give you up to 10-times faster speeds, NBN says. So upgrade to Home Fast, Home Superfast or Home Ultrafast if you want to benefit from the upgraded speeds.

The last step is making sure your home equipment can keep up. NBN recommends you update your modem about as often as you would your mobile phone, especially if it’s older than five years. Older routers with older technology, such as Wi-Fi 4, will be able to deliver speed of only about 100 megabits per second. If you want the best current speeds, of up to 1000 megabits per second, consider upgrading to a router with Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7.

What are Telstra and other telcos saying?

Each of the providers contacted by this masthead said they will pass on the upgrades.

“We’ll be passing on NBN’s new internet speed upgrades to customers on eligible plans and technology at no extra cost,” a Telstra spokesman said.

Optus says it will automatically enable the speed upgrades in September at no extra cost, as will Aussie Broadband, Superloop and TPG.

“This is one of the biggest upgrades we’ve seen to the internet in years, and we’re making sure our customers are ready to take full advantage of it,” a TPG spokesman said. “Some modems, regardless of how new they are, simply aren’t built to support these higher speeds. That’s going to cause frustration, so we want to ensure customers understand what’s changing and how to get the most out of it.

“We’ll be contacting customers with everything they need to know, including when their upgrade is happening, how to check their modem and what to do if a new one is needed.”

The advocacy group for communications consumers, ACCAN, says customers shouldn’t rush to upgrade unnecessarily.

“Don’t feel pressured to upgrade to a faster or more expensive plan unless you’re confident you’ll benefit from the extra speed,” ACCAN chief executive Carol Bennett says.

“We welcome these improvements to NBN infrastructure and speeds but also want to ensure all consumers – especially low-income households and those in regional areas – can access affordable and reliable services, not just faster ones.”

What will this mean for Australia’s broadband rankings?

Australia most recently ranked a lowly 75 on Speedtest’s global speed rankings, one place above Uzbekistan and just below Oman, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Jamaica, with customers reporting an average of 88 megabits per second. Expect this number to climb over the next few months as customers upgrade plans or automatically have their speeds bumped up.

Will there be more upgrades in the future?

Yep. NBN has announced a “Home Hyperfast” plan coming in the future that would offer speeds of up to 2000 megabits per second for FTTP connections, which would be the fastest residential NBN plan ever.

“We are actively investing in our FTTP and HFC networks to support future technologies such as AI, smart homes and quantum computing. This continued investment signals that further upgrades will follow to meet growing data demands,” NBN general manager Jane McNamara says.

“In January we announced we will upgrade the remaining fibre-to-the-node network across Australia. This investment will benefit around 622,000 homes and businesses across the country, with more than half located in regional Australia. The upgrades are expected to be completed by the end of 2030.”

Here is the link:

https://www.smh.com.au/technology/the-nbn-is-getting-its-biggest-upgrade-ever-most-people-have-no-idea-20250731-p5mj99.html

I have to say I am one of them who had no idea! However, it sounds like good news to be!

I am one of the lucky ones close to the Sydney CBD woo already has 80+ Megabits/sec so really I am not feeling any great need personally for much more but I can understand many families with multiple users and businesses many feel annoyed and slower than they would prefer.

If things are going to speed up at no extra cost it sounds good to me and I wonder why there is not more publicity. I also wonder about my old modem in the new faster world!

Is the article a con? I wonder. Confirmation and details either way appreciated!

David.

Sunday, August 10, 2025

This Seemed Like A Wholesome Approach To Life For A Quiet Sunday!

This appeared earlier today and seemed reasonably sensible!

Chase joy, and eight other life lessons I live by

Jessica Rowe

Writer

August 10, 2025 — 5.00am

What does 55 years on the planet mean to me? I’m in a good place thanks to family, laughter, love, Botox, bucketfuls of coffee, antidepressants, HRT, and furry and non-furry friends. So, what are the lessons I’ve learnt along the way? As per my habit of oversharing, let me scatter some pocketfuls of sunshine and shamelessness that have helped me. These nine life lessons are in no particular order. Do with them what you will, as I’ve never been great at taking advice.

Lesson No.1: Never underestimate the power of silliness. The older I get, the more defiant I become about wearing home-crafted hats, dress-up costumes and doing daggy dance moves, because they crack me up. In my office/junk room I have a chest of drawers full of absurd sunnies, ridiculous hats, glittery fairy wings, a banana suit and a pea-in-a-pod outfit. There’s a costume shop that I can’t go past without adding to my collection – despite the eye rolls from my husband and our sensible children. Being silly gives you permission to play, daydream, create and laugh at yourself. It’s also a way of dealing with the heaviness of the world. Never take yourself too seriously.

Friends are the people who make you feel comfortable in your messy skin. You don’t need to put on a performance or wear a mask around them.

Lesson No.2: Chase joy. What makes your heart lighter? It’s not always about the big life moments. For me, it’s about seeking out something small each day that makes the mundane more manageable. It’s noticing the cheeky antics of the cockatoos that swoop and screech above your car as you drive your kids to yet another destination. It’s the coral-coloured lipstick that I team with my technicolour outfits, or my decision to colour my greying hair a fabulous flamingo tint.

Lesson No.3: Be brave enough to do something you’re bad at. I’ve done dancing shows on television even though I move like an ironing board. I also did an audition tape for The Masked Singer with a hilariously appalling version of So What by Pink. Not surprisingly, the producers rejected me but I had no regrets.

However, lesson No.4 is to be brave enough to remove yourself from people and situations that leach your precious energy. These people are takers, who can suffocate the light out of you. You’re left depleted after spending time in their orbit. Friends are the people who make you feel comfortable in your messy skin. You don’t need to put on a performance or wear a mask around them. They understand if you don’t always reply to their messages. Your friendship circle diminishes as you get older, and that’s OK. Some people are meant for just a season of your life. And that doesn’t mean you don’t still love them or treasure the times you shared together, just that you don’t love them for your life now.

Lesson No.5 is to know that books and words are powerful. They help you to time travel, visit destinations on your bucket list, and try on different lives and perspectives without leaving home. I was lucky enough to grow up surrounded by books. Mum had a bookshelf built that covered one whole wall of our living room. My old copy of The Pink Ballet Slippers still has my chocolate-covered fingerprints – from the biscuits I’d smuggle out of the fridge at night – on the yellowed pages.

Lesson No.6: Chocolate in bed is good for you. It could be munching on peppermint creams at night while the glow of your Kindle keeps you company as the rest of the house sleeps, or chocolate cake with coffee for Sunday brekkie in bed.

Lesson No.7: No one has the perfect life and family. We’re all flawed creatures coping the best we can. And we don’t always get it right. Remember social media is not the real world. It’s exhausting trying to fit into a box you think you need to mould yourself into. Shed other people’s expectations and do what works for you, your life and your family. You are the only one living your life.

Lesson No.8 is non-negotiable for me: Kindness counts. Smile and make time for the people that cross your path. There is so much we can’t control in this crazy world, but we can control how we interact with those around us. Notice people; everyone wants to feel seen, listened to, and heard.

And my final lesson is to stay curious. It’s never too late to reinvent yourself or try new things. So what are you waiting for?

Here is the link:

https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/chase-joy-and-eight-other-life-lessons-i-live-by-20250723-p5mha0.html

There can be little harm in setting our aspirations a little higher! Maybe it will improve things just a little!!! An interesting list of things Jessica hoped would help!

I plan to spend the next day or so being a bit more positive and encouraging forward looking happiness etc. I can’t do any harm!!!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 806 – Results – 10 August 2025.

Here are the results of the recent poll.

Is Australia Being Too Weak In Failing To Demand An End To The Fighting In Gaza?

Yes                                                                     10 (48%)

No                                                                      10 (48%)

I Have No Idea                                                    1 (5%)

Total No. Of Votes: 21

A very clearly tied vote – with readers not sure what they want!

Any insights on the poll are welcome, as a comment, as usual!

Poor voter turnout – question must have been useless. 

1 of 21 who answered the poll admitted to not being sure about the answer to the question!

Again, many, many thanks to all those who voted! 

David.

Friday, August 08, 2025

I Must Say It Is Good To See Our Treasurer Worrying Outside The Box!

This appeared last week:

Australian economy

Australia and the AI revolution – turning algorithms into opportunities

Jim Chalmers

We cannot simply let AI rip, but nor can we pretend it’s not happening – we can chart a middle course that makes our people beneficiaries, not victims of technological change, writes the federal treasurer

Sun 3 Aug 2025 06.00 AEST

It seems a lifetime ago, but it was 2017 when the former NBN CEO Mike Quigley and I wrote a book about the impact of technology on our labour market.

Changing Jobs: The Fair Go in the New Machine Age was our attempt to make sense of rapid technological change and its implications for Australian workers.

It sprang from a thinkers’ circle Andrew Charlton and I convened regularly back then, to consider the biggest, most consequential shifts in our economy.

Flicking through the book now makes it very clear that the pace of change since then has been breathtaking.

The stories of Australian tech companies give a sense of its scale.

In 2017, the cloud design pioneer Canva was valued at $US1bn – today, it’s more than $US30bn.

Leading datacentre company AirTrunk was opening its first two centres in Sydney and Melbourne. It now has almost a dozen across Asia-Pacific and is backed by one of the world’s biggest investors.

We understand a churning and changing world is a source of opportunity but also anxiety for Australians.

While the technology has changed, our goal as leaders remains the same.

The responsibility we embrace is to make Australian workers, businesses and investors beneficiaries, not victims, of that change.

That matters more than ever in a new world of artificial intelligence.

The AI ‘hype cycle’

Breakthroughs in “large language models” (LLMs) – computer programs trained on massive datasets that can understand and respond in human languages – have triggered a booming AI “hype cycle” and are driving a “cognitive industrial revolution”.

ChatGPT became a household name in a matter of months and has reframed how we think about working, creating and problem-solving.

LLMs have been adopted seven times faster than the internet and 20 times faster than electricity. The rapid take-up has driven the biggest rise in the S&P 500 since the late 1990s.

Sign up: AU Breaking News email

According to one US estimate, eight out of 10 workers could use LLMs for at least 10% of their work in future.

Yet businesses are still in the discovery phase, trying to separate hype from reality and determine what AI to build, buy or borrow.

Two huge impacts

Artificial intelligence will completely transform our economy. Every aspect of life will be affected.

I’m optimistic that AI will be a force for good, but realistic about the risks.

The Nobel prize-winning economist Darren Acemoglu estimates that AI could boost productivity by 0.7% over the next decade, but some private sector estimates are up to 30 times higher.

Goldman Sachs expects AI could drive gross domestic product (GDP) growth up 7% over the next 10 years, and PwC estimates it could bump up global GDP by $15.7tn by 2030.

The wide variation in estimates is partly due to different views on how long it will take to integrate AI into business workflows deeply enough to transform the market size or cost base of industries.

But if some of the predictions prove correct, AI may be the most transformative technology in human history.

At its best, it will convert energy into analysis, and more productivity into higher living standards.

It’s expected to have at least two significant economy-wide effects.

First, it reduces the cost of information processing.

One example of this is how eBay’s AI translation tools have removed language barriers to drive international sales. The increase in cross-border trade is the equivalent of having buyers and sellers 26% closer to one another – effectively shrinking the distance between Australia and global markets.

This is one reason why the World Trade Organization forecasts AI will lower trade costs and boost trade volumes by up to 13%.

Second, cheaper analysis accelerates and increases our problem-solving capacity, which can, in turn, speed up innovation by reducing research and development (R&D) costs and skills bottlenecks.

By making more projects stack up commercially, AI is likely to raise investment, boost GDP and generate demand for human expertise.

Concerns over jobs

Despite the potential for AI to create more high-skilled, high-wage jobs, some are concerned that adoption will lead to big increases in unemployment. The impact of AI on the labour force is uncertain, but there are good reasons to be optimistic.

One study finds that more than half of the use cases of LLMs involve workers iterating back and forth with the technology, augmenting workers’ skills in ways that enable them to achieve more.

Another recent study found that current LLMs often automate only some tasks within roles, freeing up employees to add more value rather than reducing hours worked.

These are some of the reasons many expect the AI transformation to enhance skills and change the nature of work, rather than causing widespread or long-term structural unemployment.

Even so, the impact of AI on the nature of work is expected to be substantial.

We’ve seen this play out before – more than half the jobs people do today are in occupations that didn’t even exist at the start of the second world war.

Some economists have suggested AI could increase occupational polarisation – driving a U-shaped increase in demand for manual roles that are harder to automate and high-skill roles that leverage technology, but a reduction in demand for medium-skilled tasks.

But workers in many of these occupations may be able to leverage AI to complete more specialised tasks and take on more productive, higher-paying roles. In this transition, the middle has the most to gain and the most at stake.

There is also a risk that AI could increase short-term unemployment if investment in skills does not keep up with the changing nature of work.

Governments have an important role to play here, and a big motivation for our record investment in education is ensuring that skills keep pace with technological change. But it’s also up to business, unions and the broader community to ensure we continue to build the human capital and skills we need to grasp this opportunity.

Australia’s opportunity

To be optimistic about AI is not to dismiss the risks, which are not limited to the labour market.

The ability of AI to rapidly collate, create and disseminate information and disinformation makes people more vulnerable to fraud and poses a risk to democracies.

AI technologies are also drastically reducing the cost of surveillance and increasing its effectiveness, with implications for privacy, autonomy at work and, in some cases, personal security.

There are questions of ethics, of inequality, of bias in algorithms, and legal responsibility for decision-making when AI is involved.

These new technologies will also put pressure on resources such as energy, land, water and telecoms infrastructure, with implications for carbon emissions.

But we are well placed to manage the risks and maximise the opportunities.

In 2020, Australia was ranked sixth in the world in terms of AI companies and research institutions when accounting for GDP. Our industrial opportunities are vast and varied – from developing AI software to using AI to unlock value in traditional industries.

Markets for AI hardware – particularly chips – and foundational models are quite concentrated. About 70% of the widely used foundational models have been developed in the US, and three US firms claim 65% of the global cloud computing market.

But farther downstream, markets for AI software and services are dynamic, fragmented and more competitive. The Productivity Commission sees potential to develop areas of comparative advantage in these markets.

Infrastructure is an obvious place to start.

According to the International Data Corporation, global investment in AI infrastructure increased 97% in the first half of 2024 to $US47bn and is on its way to $US200bn by 2028. We are among the top five global destinations for datacentres and a world leader in quantum computing.

Our landmass, renewable energy potential and trusted international partnerships make us an attractive destination for data processing.

Our substantial agenda, from the capacity investment scheme to the Future Made in Australia plan, will be key to this. They are good examples of our strategy to engage and invest, not protect and retreat.

The way ahead

Our intention is to regulate as much as necessary to protect Australians, but as little as possible to encourage innovation.

There is much work already under way: our investment in quantum computing company PsiQuantum and AI adopt centres, development of Australia’s first voluntary AI safety standard, putting AI on the critical technologies list, a national capability plan, and work on R&D.

Next steps will build on the work of colleagues like the assistant minister for the digital economy, Andrew Charlton, the science minister, Tim Ayres and former science minister Ed Husic, and focus on at least five things:

  • Building confidence in AI to accelerate development and adoption in key sectors.
  • Investing in and encouraging up skilling and reskilling to support our workforce.
  • Helping to attract, streamline, speed up and coordinate investment in data infrastructure that’s in the national interest, in ways that are cost effective, sustainable and make the most of our advantages.
  • Promoting fair competition in global markets and building demand and capability locally to secure our influence in AI supply chains.
  • And working with the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, to deliver safer and better public services using AI.

Beneficiaries of change

Artificial intelligence will be a key concern of the economic reform roundtable I’m convening this month because it has major implications for economic resilience, productivity and budget sustainability. I’m setting these thoughts out now to explain what we’ll grapple with and how.

AI is contentious, and of course, there is a wide spectrum of views, but we are ambitious and optimistic.

We can deploy AI in a way consistent with our values if we treat it as an enabler, not an enemy, by listening to and training workers to adapt and augment their work.

Because empowering people to use AI well is not just a matter of decency or a choice between prosperity and fairness; it is the only way to get the best out of people and technology at the same time.

It is not beyond us to chart a responsible middle course on AI, which maximises the benefits and manages the risks. Not by letting it rip, and not by turning back the clock and pretending none of this is happening, but by turning algorithms into opportunities for more Australians to be beneficiaries, not victims of a rapid transformation that is gathering pace.

Jim Chalmers is the federal treasurer

Here is the link:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/03/australia-shouldnt-fear-the-ai-revolution-new-skills-can-create-more-and-better-jobs

Good on him for popping his head above the parapet and expressing a view. There should be much more of it!

David.