The Personal Health Record Market Starts to Shake Out

The following article appeared a few days ago.

Fed panel tips hat to Microsoft, Google, Dossia for advances in PHR use

By Diana Manos, Senior Editor 07/31/08

Microsoft, Google and Dossia have played a key role in advancing the use of personal health records, according to members of the American Health Information Community.

At a Tuesday AHIC meeting, members of the federal advisory panel hailed these three utility service models as "leading innovators," responsible for a major surge in the use of PHRs.

PHRs are a very dynamic market," said Nancy Davenport-Ennis, chairman of the AHIC Consumer Empowerment Workgroup."Today there are more than 200 solutions, some through independent systems, some through providers, employers and consumer-controlled groups. This is a great step forward from when AHIC started 23 meetings ago."

John Moore of Chilmark Research, a presenter at AHIC's meeting, said PHRs are used to control behavioral change in patients and lower healthcare costs. But obstacles remain – doctors are skeptical about their accuracy, and portability is "all over the map."

Moore said the utility service models, such as those provided by Dossia, Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault, allow consumers to stay firmly in control of their records, and portability has been demonstrated.

"These groups are doing the heavy lifting that other groups can't do now," he said. "Adoption potential is high because the value is high."

Many more details here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=9659

This seems to me to be adding onto the comments being made by a range of commentators that the concept of a physician held EHR is now morphing into or being enhanced by the patient increasingly taking control of their own information.

It seems to me virtually inevitable that over the next few years having a personal health record – independent of your doctor but having some input from them often – will become totally mainstream and as common as using electronic banking – especially for those with chronic health problems they need to manage.

Wait and see!

David.

The European Union and the Shared EHR

In the last week or so there have been a few reports of a case which was resolved in the European Court of Human Rights on Medical Privacy.

European judgement casts doubts on NHS CRS consent

25 Jul 2008

A GP campaigning against the consent model for the NHS Care Records Service (NCRS) claims a European Court of Human Rights judgement reinforces his view that the NHS database is unlawful.

In a judgement published last week the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a nurse in Finland had her right to privacy breached. The nurse had been attending a clinic for treatment of HIV and at the same time was working in a different department of the same hospital. It became apparent that staff in her work department had looked at her computerised medical record and she was denied subsequent employment.

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that there had been a violation of article eight of the European Convention on Human Rights and awarded the nurse compensation.

More here

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/3993/european_judgement_casts_doubts_on_nhs_crs_consent

The full judgement is available here.

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=Finland&sessionid=12272189&skin=hudoc-en

If the URL does not work – here is the case header

CASE OF I v. FINLAND

(Application no. 20511/03)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

17 July 2008

This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of I v. Finland,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:

Nicolas Bratza, President,
Lech Garlicki,
Ljiljana Mijović,
David Thór Björgvinsson,
Ján Šikuta,
Päivi Hirvelä,
Mihai Poalelungi, judges,
and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 24 June 2008,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date.

The basic details are outlined here:

European Court fines Finland for data breach

25 Jul 2008

The European Court of Human Rights has ordered the Finnish government to pay out €34,000 because it failed to protect a citizen's personal data, by not adequately securing and protecting a patient’s confidential record.

The case could prove significant by creating a legal precedent, based on the European Convention on Human Rights, linking data security and human rights.

The Court made its ruling based on Article 8 of the Convention, which guarantees every citizen “the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.” It said it was uncontested that the confidentiality of medical records is a vital component of a private life.

It also said Finland had failed to protect the confidentiality of patient information and ordered the state to pay a nurse about €14,000 in damages and €20,000 in costs.

The nurse involved in the case worked in a public hospital between 1989 and 1994 on a series of fixed term contracts. During the period, she paid regular visits to the same hospital’s infectious diseases clinic, having been diagnosed with HIV.

In 1992, it transpired that her colleagues at the hospital’s ophthalmic department had had access to her patient records. Three years later, her contract was not renewed.

The woman began to suspect that news of her disease had spread to other employees and asked for details of who had accessed her medical records and when. The health authorities only kept a note of the last five people to have accessed a record.

According to legal electronic newsletter Out-Law, the Court ruled that public bodies and governments will fall foul of the Convention if they fail to keep data private that should be kept private.

The woman in the case did not have to show a wilful publishing or release of data, it said. A failure to keep it secure was enough to breach the Convention.

The Strasbourg court found unanimously that the district health authority, by failing to establish a system from which the nurse’s confidential patient information could not be accessed by staff who did not treat her, had violated Article 8.

The woman, known in the case as I, sued the district health authority for failing to keep her medical records confidential.

More here:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/3992/european_court_fines_finland_for_data_breach

As I read it, what the court is saying is that there is an obligation on the part of record holders to ensure only those with a genuine ‘need to know’ and a genuine role in the patient’s care should be able to access the clinical record and it is up to the organisation holding the record that this is true.

Those, like NEHTA, who propose shared records where many people have access, need to be clear what the expectations of civilised communities are about how their private information is protected. If I had HIV, or another stigmatizing illness, I certainly would want confidence that my privacy would be protected and that I would be entitled to serious redress if this was not the case.

I recognise how challenging this all is but that does not mean we can ignore probably the most authoritative and experienced court on Human Rights the world has.

David.

Deloittes Discussion Points for the National E-Health Strategy – Initial Comments.

As reported late last week, on Wednesday July 30 2008, NEHIPC convened a forum to review their latest draft of the National E-Health Strategy being developed by Deloittes.

I have now had a chance to browse the slides and form some preliminary views as to where this is up to.

Before saying anything I must point out that the slides are still strictly discussion drafts only and all subject to change.

First the good.

1. There are actually the germs of a real plan contained in the slides.

2. They are working on it!

My comments thus far (and I am still thinking about it all) are as follows. These are encapsulated in an e-mail to Deloittes sent on August 3 2008 are.

-----

I have reviewed the document provided to the NEHIPC on 30 July.

Attached is a commented file with about 30 comments and suggestions.

A core issue you face right now is alignment of all that is going on in a totally strategy free - NEHTA inspired - environment from where we need to be and how the migration to a more sensible guided but still innovative outcome can be achieved. The balance between controls, incentives and involvement is difficult indeed!

I also worry the depth of the current state and strategic option development process have both been a little blinkered - especially the latter.

I am also deeply worried about all the repository proposals contained in this before we have decent information in the operational systems at the coal face - this issue is a 'show stopper' I believe unless carefully rethought.

Lastly the lack of detail on planned applications, timeframes etc I assume is because the work has not been done yet..but a business case for the entire process requires clarity as to what is really planned - not the 'fudge' that NEHTA tries to perpetrate with diagrams with no axes and no meaning.

Happy to discuss. Acknowledgment you have received the comments appreciated.

Cheers and thanks for reading

David.

-----

Frankly – right now this feels to be a too centralised, too controlling approach to me.

I wonder what others think?

David.

Useful and Interesting Health IT Links from the Last Week – 03/08/2008

Again, in the last week, I have come across a few reports and news items which are worth passing on.

These include first:

E-prescribers see Medicare bonus, but late adopters will face pay cut

Meanwhile, the government proposes new rules that would lift the ban on e-prescribing of controlled substances.

By David Glendinning, AMNews staff. Aug. 4, 2008.

Washington -- The Bush administration is running a full-court press on physicians to get them to embrace electronic prescribing well ahead of a new Medicare mandate that is a little more than three years away.

Under the Medicare payment bill that became law in July, doctors who prescribe electronically for Part D patients in 2009 will get an incentive payment equal to 2% of all the Medicare services they provide for the year. This bonus will phase down over five years and disappear at the beginning of 2014.

Starting in 2012, physicians who are still paper-only will see a cut in their total Medicare payment for the year.

A physician may be eligible for an exemption from the penalties if Medicare determines that compliance would represent a significant hardship. The law cites an example of a doctor who practices in a rural area that has insufficient Internet access.

The Bush administration did not support the measure as a whole but is moving forward aggressively to implement the e-prescribing provision, which President Bush did endorse. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will issue rules later this year that will determine exactly how the incentive system will work and when bonuses will be paid.

Plans also are in the works for a CMS conference this fall that will educate physicians about what technology to use and how to use it. The agency wants to take advantage of its "bully pulpit" to get as many doctors on board with this technology as soon as possible, said Kerry Weems, CMS acting administrator.

Much more here:

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/08/04/gvl10804.htm

It is good to see the details and the positive reaction of the AMA. This will be seen as major initiative in time I believe.

Second we have:

iPhone health applications have just about everything but the cold stethoscope

Julie Deardorff |

July 27, 2008

Cell phones can't actually get hot enough to pop popcorn, regardless of what you may have seen on YouTube. But some do have other unexpected abilities that just might help improve your quality of life.

Dozens of new health and fitness Web applications are now available for use with the Apple iPhone, which combines a mobile phone, a widescreen iPod and an Internet browser into one gadget. The apps, which likely will eventually be available on other phones that will run on a Google-based operating system, enable third-party software developers to create a new breed of health services.

These programs can literally put all your health records—including digital images such as ultrasounds and echocardiograms—into the palm of your hand. Or they can administer eye exams or keep track of your calories and exercise.

More here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-0727-health-cell-phone-sidejul27,0,3379444.column

This article provides an excellent list of over 10 applications in the health domain that are now available on the iPhone. It is fascinating to see just how quickly applications are emerging for this device – as I am sure they are with the other big contenders. We live in interesting times for device applications.

Third we have:

Twisted privacy laws to be opened up, says commission

August 01, 2008

PRIVACY laws in NSW are "unnecessarily convoluted" and require a complete revamp, according to the state Government's principal adviser on legal reform.

The NSW Law Reform Commission released yesterday a third consultation paper on privacy reform that argues it is "extremely difficult to identify which State Government agencies are covered by all or some of the privacy principles that underpin the legislation".

It also says problems exist in deciding which agencies and activities have complete or partial exemptions.

"Indeed, the current exceptions and exemptions run to several pages," said the commissioner in charge of the project, Professor Michael Tilbury.

"The current state of confusion surrounding this suggests it is the complexity of the provisions that is undermining their effectiveness."

He said the commission was proposing to:

* Amend the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW) to transfer the handling of health information by private sector organisations to the Commonwealth.

* Consider doing away with a separate health information privacy Act so that the remaining health information held by public sector agencies is regulated under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW).

* Limit the numerous exemptions in the legislation, particularly exemptions to the definition of "personal information".

* Facilitate the exchange of information between agencies and organisations to improve the provision of services to vulnerable people, particularly in the area of child protection.

Much more here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24109007-17044,00.html

This is a very sensible idea – as long as the Commonwealth powers are appropriate and robust. We don’t need the railway gauge problem in E-Health in OZ!

Fourth we have:

E-health discussion paper ahead of its time, literally: expert

Elizabeth McIntosh - Friday, 1 August 2008

A NATIONAL e-Health Transition Authority discussion paper on an e-health patient and provider identification system has been labelled as premature by a health IT expert.

The paper, E-Health ID, has been released ahead of a $1.3 million government funded report from consultancy firm Deloitte, which is expected to indicate what NEHTA’s future direction should be.

Health IT consultant Dr David More said while NEHTA was under pressure, it had to “deliver results on what’s needed, not what they think should be needed”.

However, AMA e-health committee chair Dr Peter Garcia-Webb said unless Deloitte returned with anything hugely unexpected, it was time the authority started informing people on how a new e-health system could work.

More here (Subscription Required):

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/News/0,1734,3021,01200808.aspx

I am sorry but Dr Garcia-Web is just wrong on this. It is virtually certain the National Strategy will not recommend a centralised national IEHR and so this money is being spent in educating people about something that is very unlikely to happen.

Fifth we have:

Canberrans to get health cards in $1b overhaul

BY DAVID STOCKMAN

29/07/2008 12:00:00 AM

A hospital for women and children, an electronic health card and a health centre in Gungahlin are the first projects announced under the ACT Government's $1 billion plan to redevelop the health system.

The Stanhope Government has launched a week-long advertising campaign to ''sell'' the $300 million package to the public.

The balance of $700 million will be spent on projects to be outlined over the next 10 years.

Health Minister Katy Gallagher detailed the initial spending yesterday, which had been announced in last month's budget.

It includes a plan to introduce health cards for Canberrans that will enable them to access a database of patients' medical histories.

More here:

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/canberrans-to-get-health-cards-in-1b-overhaul/1228839.aspx

More coverage is found here:

http://health.act.gov.au/c/health?a=sp&did=10241971

It is clearly a good thing to see the ACT planning some serious Health IT, but one has to worry where the idea of Health Cards fits – given we have a national e-health strategy process underway. Such ideas have been floated frequently but have seldom come to anything.

I must say that $47 Million over 4 years seems a reasonable sum to invest to upgrade the ACT systems.

Sixth we have:

How secure is secure enough?

Are your information security plans too big, too small or just right? Here are five steps to help you decide.

Jaikumar Vijayan 29/07/2008 07:44:00

If there is a Holy Grail in the information security industry, it surely is the answer to the question, "How secure is secure enough?"

It's a question that many security managers have either avoided answering altogether or tried to quickly sidestep by throwing a fistful of mainly pointless operational metrics at anyone who cared to ask.

But with a faltering economy beginning to put the squeeze on IT budgets, and security managers being asked to justify every dollar they spend, there is a growing need to come up with a better answer to the query. Increasingly, there is pressure on IT managers to demonstrate how exactly their security investments are helping them manage threats to their businesses. Companies want to know if the money they are spending on security is too much, too little or just enough.

Answering the question with any degree of accuracy involves art and luck as much as it does science, say security managers. But by adopting the right approaches, it is possible to arrive at a better answer than some might expect, they say.

Here are five steps to help you determine whether your company is secure enough.

Much more here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=1271919968&eid=-255

An ever present issue in the Health IT domain, this is a useful framework to assist in considering just what the objectives of one’s security plans should be and how much should be invested in making it happen.

Last we have our slightly technical note for the week:

Hello, Cuil world

July 28, 2008

Anna Patterson's last internet search engine was so impressive that industry leader Google bought the technology in 2004 to upgrade its own system.

She believes her latest invention is even more valuable - only this time it's not for sale.

Patterson instead intends to upstage Google, which she quit in 2006 to develop a more comprehensive and efficient way to scour the internet.

The end result is Cuil, pronounced "cool." Backed by $US33 million ($A34.6 million) in venture capital, the search engine was set to begin processing requests for the first time today.

Cuil had kept a low profile while Patterson, her husband, Tom Costello, and two other former Google engineers - Russell Power and Louis Monier - searched for better ways to search.

Now, it's boasting time.

For starters, Cuil's search index spans 120 billion web pages.

Patterson believes that is at least three times the size of Google's index, although there is no way to know for certain. Google stopped publicly quantifying its index's breadth nearly three years ago when the catalog spanned 8.2 billion web pages.

Cuil won't divulge the formula it has developed to cover a wider swath of the web with far fewer computers than Google. And Google isn't ceding the point: Spokeswoman Katie Watson said her company still believes its index is the largest.

More here:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/hello-cuil-world/2008/07/28/1217097137646.html

Having given this a try I can say I believe this is not a bad effort – but won’t expect to see Google knocked of the throne anytime soon. It is different enough to have bookmarked of a search for a particular piece if information is just not yielding what you need.

The history of search and the size of Google’s market share make this an interesting read.

More next week.

David.

Important Australian National E-Health Strategy Document to Review

The following was posted on the HISA Site today. (August 1, 2008)

National E-Health Strategy Draft Review

On Wednesday July 30, NEHIPC convened a forum to review their latest draft of the National E-Health Strategy being developed by Deloittes. Michael Legg (HISA President) represented HISA at this event.

An output of the forum was the agreement to release the slide pack used on that day for comment by key stakeholders.

The documents can be obtained by e-mail request from the page below.

HISA now needs your feedback on this document. More than ever, governments are looking for input from the broader e-Health community. Download the document, read it and then post you comments on the HISA NEHIPC Strategy Forum page (click here to go to the forum page). We will use your input to provide direct feedback into the strategy development process.

It is vital all who are interested request, review and comment.

David.

3.30 pm Note: I have been requested to make information available on request only. Polite contact to hisa@hisa.org.au should be made for a copy of the slide-pack.

D.

Three Interesting Reports on Parts of Health IT

It seems the last week or two has been a big one for new reports.

First we have a review of Health Informatics in the UK NHS.

NHS Informatics Review says trusts need 'interim' systems

10 Jul 2008

NHS trusts are to get support, and in some cases may get national funding, to select and install “interim” systems as a result of the NHS Informatics Review.

The change in emphasis comes in response to delays of four years or more in the strategic, detailed electronic record systems at the heart of the National Programme for IT in the NHS.

The review, which was led by the Department of Health’s interim chief information officer, Matthew Swindells, before his departure to the private sector, says that good information and good information systems are essential for the delivery of Lord Darzi’s Next Stage Review of the NHS.

It reaffirms the goal of the national programme to deliver integrated care records systems, but acknowledges the impact on trusts of lengthy delays in the delivery of strategic systems from local service providers.

It also spells out the need to use proven systems until better ones becoming available. Interim systems are expected to range from very specialised departmental systems through to hospital-wide patient administration systems.

More here:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/3938/nhs_informatics_review_says_trusts_need_%27interim%27_systems#c9439

Additional information is found here:

HealthSpace set for big expansion

15 Jul 2008

HealthSpace, the government’s secure online site for patients, is to be expanded to include shared records and GP appointment booking, according to the Health Informatics Review.

The review, published last week, outlines a much wider role for HealthSpace and says its consultation highlighted strong support for the HealthSpace initiative.

In future HealthSpace will be accessed via the NHS’s website NHS Choices and the reviews sets out the proposed features including the ability for patients to record their treatment preferences, to view their Summary Care Record and, for those with long-term conditions, to access a shared record.

The document adds: “We propose an early implementation of a shared record for patients with long-term conditions such as diabetes, which will allow a more active and participative role in their care.”

The list of features which patients could benefit from includes:

• a self-care section to enable patients to monitor their condition and load the results for GPs to view and discuss at future appointments.

• Access to Summary Care Records and the ability to store information and preference.

• Reminders on tests, appointments and screening and personalised information for those with long term conditions.

• Secure online interaction with GPs and the ability to email a request for a repeat prescription.

• The ability to see available slots and book an appointment with their GP, practice nurse or hospital.

• An accessible and secure site which will show patients who has accessed their information.

More here:

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/3948/healthspace_set_for_big_expansion

The full report (.pdf) can the downloaded from the following link.

http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_086073

Second we have the following from iHealthBeat.

Two Reports Highlight Importance of Health IT

by George Lauer, iHealthBeat Features Editor

Last week, in a scorecard rating the most expensive health care in the world, the Commonwealth Fund said the U.S. isn't getting its money's worth.

Last month, a respected health researcher and academician said it's getting difficult to be a competent physician in this country without technical support.

The two reports are not unrelated.

David Mechanic, director of the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research at Rutgers University, argued in the health policy journal Milbank Quarterly last month that physicians who don't use IT might not be performing to professional standards.

Asked how his assessment related to the Commonwealth Fund scorecard last week showing that the U.S. health system is falling short in several areas, Mechanic said, "There is, of course, a link in that IT and [electronic health records] are important tools that will facilitate addressing many of the deficiencies and absurdities of health care in America."

…..

Reaching Similar Conclusions

The Commonwealth Fund scorecard ends with a recommendation to pursue several strategies including:

• Universal and well-designed coverage that ensures affordable access and continuity of care, with low administrative costs;
• Incentives aligned to promote higher quality and more efficient care;
• Care designed and organized around the patient, not providers or insurers; and
• Widespread implementation of health IT with information exchange.

Mechanic ends his book with similar sentiment:

"At some point, we as a nation will have to decide whether we wish to design our health care system primarily to satisfy those who profit from it or to protect the health and welfare of all Americans ... anything is possible if the public begins to appreciate how little it gets for what it really pays."

MORE ON THE WEB

• Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard
• Milbank Quarterly

Much more here:

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2008/7/25/Two-Reports-Highlight-Importance-of-Health-IT.aspx?a=1

There is an abstract for the full Milbank Quarterly article available

http://www.milbank.org/860205.html

Rethinking Medical Professionalism: The Role of Information Technology and Practice Innovations

David Mechanic

Context: Physician leaders and the public have become increasingly concerned about the erosion of medical professionalism. Changes in the organization, economics, and technology of medical care have made it difficult to maintain competence, meet patients’ expectations, escape serious conflicts of interest, and distribute finite resources fairly. Information technology (IT), electronic health records (EHRs), improved models of disease management, and new ways of relating to and sharing responsibility for patients’ care can contribute to both professionalism and quality of care.

Methods: The potential of IT, EHRs, and other practice facilitators for professionalism is assessed through diverse but relevant literatures, examination of relevant websites, and experience in working with medical leaders on renewing professionalism.

Findings: IT and EHRs are the basis of needed efforts to reinforce medical competence, improve relationships with patients, implement disease management programs, and, by increasing transparency and accountability, help reduce some conflicts of interest. Barriers include the misalignment of goals with payment incentives and time pressures in meeting patients’ expectations and practice demands. Implementing IT and EHRs in small, dispersed medical practices is particularly challenging because of short-term financial costs, disruptions in practice caused by learning and adaptation, and the lack of confidence in needed support services. Large organized systems like the VA, Kaiser-Permanente, and general practice in the United Kingdom have successfully overcome such challenges.

Conclusions: IT and the other tools examined in this article are important adjuncts to professional capacities and aspirations. They have potential to help reverse the decline of primary care and make physicians’ practices more effective and rewarding. The cooperation, collaboration, and shared responsibility of government, insurers, medical organizations, and physicians, as well as financial and technical support, are needed to implement these tools in the United States’ dispersed and fragmented medical care system.

I am sure many who are interested will be able to access to full article via their library services.

All in all just too much reading for one week following on the huge Quality and Safety Report from last week!

David.

Wireless and HealthCare Delivery.

The following release appeared a few days ago

Mobile Medics Will Shape The Medical Device Market

Doctors on the move and domiciliary healthcare workers are changing the way patients are treated and are creating new and exciting opportunities for both medical device manufacturers and the consumer electronics industry, according to research by UK based analysts Wireless Healthcare.

Cambridge, UK (PRWEB) July 22, 2008 -- The increase in the level of healthcare being delivered by mobile medical practitioners outside of hospitals will become a key driver within the medical device market over the next decade. According to a report by Cambridge UK based analysts Wireless Healthcare, as healthcare providers are pushing more diagnostic and monitoring processes out to the edge of their care networks, medical device vendors are responding by adding more advanced communications technology to their products.

The report, "Wireless Healthcare 2008", also identifies a number of consumer electronics companies that have successfully positioned their products within the mobile healthcare market. According to Peter Kruger, Analyst with Wireless Healthcare: "Some of these companies are attempting to emulate Polar Electronics, who have built a strong presence in the ehealth sector and use their sports and fitness monitoring technology to capture vital signs data in ehealth applications."

The report sees diet and fitness monitoring as a key entry point for companies coming into the medical device market, due to the fact that devices can be launched without the need for long, complex and expensive approval procedures. Sales of devices aimed at the preventative healthcare market are also being driven by ageing baby boomers, concerned enough about their health to purchase a device privately rather than wait for their healthcare provider to prescribe one. Wireless Healthcare points out that once established in the consumer healthcare market, vendors can add features to devices that will attract the attention of established healthcare providers.

Wireless Healthcare's research points to a degree of convergence occurring within the healthcare sector once incumbent healthcare providers have finished building their core IT infrastructure. Pressure from small "nextgen" healthcare providers will create a struggle to open up the last mile of the healthcare network - similar to the battle between small ISPs and incumbent Telcos during the late 1990s for access to the last mile of the telecommunications network. This time, however, according to Wireless Healthcare, the key weapon will be mobile, rather than fixed line communications technology.

"Wireless Healthcare 2008" is available from www.wirelesshealthcare.co.uk

About Wireless Healthcare

Wireless Healthcare are UK based analysts specialising in mobile and wireless technology in the healthcare sector.

Release URL:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/7/prweb1122424.htm

Many more details on this report are found here:

http://www.wirelesshealthcare.co.uk/wh/report_2008.htm

I only wish I had the $1600 dollars to buy the report. I am sure it would make very interesting reading. It seems to me that mobile wireless devices are going to play an increasingly important part in health care delivery. Certainly we are seeing rapidly expanding use of such devices in Medical Schools worldwide.

David.

Open Source Starts to Bite in e-Health

It seems not a month can go past without major open-source news in the e-Health space.

The most recent appeared a few days ago.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/open-ehealth-foundation-defines-development/story.aspx?guid={F1748A63-C488-42EC-BCC4-DB2C3AC278D8}&dist=hppr

Open eHealth Foundation Defines Development Priorities

Open eHealth Foundation Now an Official Nonprofit Organization - Board of Directors and President Elected - Development Priorities Defined

Last update: 1:15 p.m. EDT July 24, 2008

WAYNE, Pa. and WALLDORF, Germany, July 24, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Open eHealth Foundation (OeHF), an open source initiative for the efficient exchange of medical information based on existing standards, is officially registered as a nonprofit organization in Delaware. This milestone enables the foundation (which was launched at HIMSS 2008 by Agfa HealthCare, InterComponentWare and Sun Microsystems) to begin operations.

Board of Directors and President Elected

As the OeHF's first Chairman of the Board, the foundation members elected Lindsy Strait from Sun Microsystems. Additional board members include Thomas Liebscher, InterComponentWare, and Evgueni Loukipoudis, Agfa HealthCare. As Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Loukipoudis will be responsible for the architecture as well as the interoperability of software components developed by the OeHF.

Alexander Ihls was appointed OEHF's President and also acts as Chief Business Development Officer (CBDO). In this function, he is directing the foundation's orientation and is responsible for the acquisition of new partners and members. Richard Golden assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer (COO) for the foundation and will be responsible for setting up the infrastructure and the organization of development projects.

Development Priorities Defined

The OeHF will use existing IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise) profiles as a guideline for its development activities. All the OeHF service components will be designed flexibly, will offer IHE compliant functionality, and will be usable in national initiatives such as the Canada Health Infoway or the Fraunhofer electronic case record in Germany.

The OeHF has prioritized the initial IHE profiles, which will be given priority for being implemented as open source components. Initially, actors from the IHE PIX/PDQ (Patient Identifier Cross Referencing / Patient Demographics Query) profile (and related profiles) will be implemented. The development work for these components has already started. The results will be presented at HIMSS 2009 in Chicago to the general public.

Open Membership

The OeHF is open for additional members interested in participating in the community. Visit www.openehealth.org for additional information.

About Open eHealth Foundation

Open eHealth Foundation (OeHF), launched at HIMSS 08, uses existing open source projects for developing a platform on which its members and other providers can create open source components that are made available free of charge, including reference implementations to obtain high semantic interoperability based on open standards. Open eHealth Foundation will not develop any new interoperability standards, but teams up with the existing standardization organizations to implement already defined standards in its open source components, and to provide reference implementations for these standards.

All your questions on this new initiative are answered here.

http://www.openehealth.wikispaces.net/Questions+%26+Answers

This follows relatively hard on the heels of other recent announcements.

Of considerable importance is the Open Health Tools Initiative which can be found here.

http://www.openhealthtools.org/news.htm

The list of partners is very impressive.

OHT Inaugural Members

OHT is a collaborative organization comprised of the following standards organizations, academia, national health systems, the open source community, vendors and IT professionals:

Government agencies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia striving to provide healthcare professionals with rapid access to accurate and complete patient information, enabling better decisions about treatment and diagnosis:

• Canada Health Infoway, Inc.
• National e-Health Transition Authority (Australia)
• National Health Service, Connecting for Health (United Kingdom)
• Veterans Health Administration (United States)

Health standards agencies providing open, neutral, international standards for the effort:

• Health Level 7
• Healthcare Services Specification Project
• International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation
• Object Management Group

Academia and research:

• Linkoping University
• Oregon State University, Open Source Lab
• Mohawk College

Vendors and open source organizations providing compelling medical software, services and equipment solutions:

• B2 International
• BT
• CollabNet
• Eclipse
• IBM
• Innoopract
• Inpriva
• JP Systems
• Kestral
• NexJ Systems
• Ocean Informatics
• Oracle
• Ozmosis
• Palamida
• Red Hat

Also impressive are the contributions made or planned from the UK NHS and the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization (IHTSDO) (see July 17, 2008 announcement)

It seems to me what we have here are substantive moves towards a much more open e-Health future.

All this, of course builds on the work of others involved in such areas as openEHR (http://www.openehr.org/home.html) the OpenMRS (http://openmrs.org/wiki/OpenMRS) and a large range of others.

There is even some activity in Australia! See http://code.google.com/p/wedgetail/

For those with an interest there is a reasonably active e-mail discussion group.

List infolist openhealth@yahoogroups.com

Contact openhealth-owner@yahoogroups.com

Unsubscribe from the list: mailto:openhealth-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

This is clearly an area to close eye on.

David.