Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, July 23, 2009

The Victorian Government Provides A Trip Down Memory Lane!

I was searching to see if there were any new bits of information around on E-Health in Australia and I came upon the very interesting and current site provided by the Victorian Government on E-Health. (In fact on e-Government in general)

The site describes itself as follows:

About This Site

The eGovernment Resource Centre provides access to the Victorian Government body of knowledge on eGovernment, information and communications technology (ICT) and government website best practices, with Australian and international examples.

In 1995 the Victorian State Government, in Australia, set an ambitious target to have all suitable government services online by the end of 2001. In 1998, a knowledge management process was put in place to share government online learnings as they evolved. One of the outputs of this knowledge management process was the Government Online Resource Centre - a web based repository made available to the Victorian Public Sector on the Victorian Government Intranet. Due to demand from other government agencies who could not access the Intranet service, this resource was subsequently published on the Internet in December 2000. In March 2002, the Victorian government launched "Putting People at the Centre" - the Victorian Government's eGovernment vision.

The Victorian Government's eGovernment vision has four pillars:

  • Substantially improving support and services to citizens
  • Providing better community engagement and more effective democracy
  • Using innovation in finding new opportunities
  • Creating a framework for ongoing reform within government.

To assist the vision, the site was relaunched as the eGovernment Resource Centre. The Resource Centre actively collects research supporting each of these pillars by sharing resources with more than 20,000 eGovernment and eDemocracy researchers who visit the site from around the world every month.

Lots more here:

http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/index.php?env=AD14EFC8C0FD-innews/detail:m951-1-1-8-s:l-0-0-1-:n-7-1-0

The specific part I visited was found here:

http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/index.php?env=-categories:m957-1-1-8-s-0:l-0-1-1--

This shows a good list of current stories and was updated as recently as Friday.

What interested me most was to discover that the archive went back quite a way.

See here:

http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/index.php?env=-innews/detail:m957-1-1-8-s-0:n-529-1-0--

The following caught my eye:

E-Health Technology Centre Launch Health Insurance Commission 27 February 2001 Speech Dr Michael Wooldridge Minister for Health and Aged Care "I am delighted to open this e-Health Technology Centre, which will assist the Health Insurance Commission to ensure the smooth transition of existing and new services to the Internet. Information technology has enormous potential to assist in the delivery of health care in Australia, both through continuing increases in raw computing power and the development of interconnecting networks, of which the Internet is -- of course -- pre-eminent..."

Booster shot for e-health, by Karen Dearne. AustralianIT, August 12, 2003. "HEALTH ministers have agreed to create two peak bodies to cut through the confusion in setting up major e-health projects, including HealthConnect and MediConnect..."

e-Health project takes off, by Karen Dearne. AustralianIT, November 19, 2003. "US defence systems integrator Boeing is partnering with Australian healthcare providers to develop and commercialise an innovative "health value chain management" approach to the network and interoperability problems delaying widespread adoption of e-health programs..."

Patent threatens e-health scheme, by Karen Dearne. The Australian, February 3, 2004. "The future of MediConnect is in doubt as advisers warn that the Pharmacy Guild of Australia may own key aspects of the Federal Government's electronic system giving pharmacists direct access to people's medication records and entitlements..."

Abbott forces pace on e-health, by Karen Dearne. AustralianIT, March 16, 2004. "Planned roll-outs of a combined HealthConnect/MediConnect system in Tasmania and South Australia as early as July, announced by Health Minister Tony Abbott last week, have stunned stakeholders..."

Diabetes web-care a success, by Diana Thorp. AustralianIT, March 30, 2004. "An Australian-first web-based program through Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital is proving successful in treating patients suffering Type 1 diabetes..."

Diabetes patients' records to go online, By Ben Woodhead. Australian Financial Review, 20 April 2004. "Health officials claim that electronic health records could revolutionise health and reduce patient deaths. But exactly what kind of personal information should be stored in these powerful new records?..." [user name and password required]

Online boost for diabetes service, By Sue Cant. The Age, April 20, 2004. "Teenagers with diabetes are logging internet health records in a test that experts hope will pave the way for a boom in online patient records..."

Health IT short of funds, by Karen Dearne. AustralianIT, May 4, 2004. "The Federal Government is under pressure to increase spending on health IT, as advisers warn that important national projects are scattered and vastly underfunded. More than 360 projects are in train across 21 different agencies and jurisdictions, according to an e-health review by Boston Consulting Group..."

E-health's $48m boost, by Geoff Elliott. AustralianIT, May 12, 2004. "E-COMMERCE is a dotcom boom buzzword that you don't see used much these days, but it's resurrected in budget health spending. The Government said it would spend a whopping $48.2 million over four years to develop electronic claim lodgment facilities, among other IT systems, for the health industry..."

Abbott to launch e-health pilot, by Karen Dearne. AustralianIT, July 6, 2004. "Health Minister Tony Abbott will unveil in Kalgoorlie today a broadband virtual private network e-health pilot that foreshadows an early introduction of high bandwidth capabilities to support HealthConnect..."

Go-ahead for online health bills, by Karen Dearne. The Australian, September 7, 2004. "The $48 million Medicare Electronic Claim Lodgement and Information Processing Environment (Eclipse) has been successfully piloted at two Brisbane Endoscopy Services sites and will roll out nationwide over the next two years..."

Seems the early years of the century were all hope. Now seemingly was are still seeing the optimistic headlines some ½ decade later and I fear we will look back in 5 years and be just as bemused at the lack of progress. Anyone want to wager I will be proven wrong?

The sense of déjà vu is just overwhelming!

On a positive note: I was also humbled to note that one of my blog postings had actually scored a reference!

See here:

Australian E-Health At A Major Fork in the Road – I Wonder Will COAG Get it Right?

by Dr David More MB, PhD, FACHI. Australian Health Information Technology, November 27, 2008. "This is probably the most important blog entry I will ever write – as what is decided at the Council of Australian Government (COAG) Meeting on Saturday will decide if we will ever see the full value that e-Health can offer delivered to the Australian public..."

The site is well worth a wander and are return visit from time to time to keep up to date on goings on! Alternatively you can continue reading here!

David.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

AMA President Talks e-Health - What a Good Thing!

The president of the Australian Medical Association spoke at the National Press Club Today.

The full transcript is found here:

http://ama.com.au/node/4827

AMA President, Dr Andrew Pesce: Speech to National Press Club

21 July 2009 - 1:30pm

Making Health Reform Real

The speech covered a wide range of issues, including:

  • GP Week
  • AMA Advocacy
  • The Big Issues
    • Governance
    • Workforce
    • Rural health
    • e-health
  • 2 Big Areas of Planned AMA Leadership
  • Long Term Care (LTC) Scheme
  • Professional responsibility
  • Conclusion

Clearly here I want to focus on the e-Health comments.

The comments on e-Health were as follows:

“While all Australians will benefit from e-health initiatives, rural Australia is where new and innovative technology and information systems will pay off big time.

Until we see dramatic improvements in rural health workforce attraction and retention, patients’ access to health services can be improved through telemedicine.

E-health infrastructure in rural Australia must be a priority for all governments.

More generally on e-health, the AMA strongly supports moves to making electronic health records a reality.

Electronic health records will bring wide-ranging benefits to the Australian community, particularly for patient safety and quality health outcomes.

We are looking at the proposals for a person-controlled electronic health record very closely.

I believe that patients should have control over who has access to their information.

We must ensure, however, that this control does not inadvertently cause limitations to access – especially in the case of emergency physicians, for instance.

Rigorous privacy safeguards must be in place.

There is a lot happening in the ehealth sector at the moment – through COAG, NEHTA, and the NHHRC.

But fundamentally this is an issue on which governments must show leadership to ensure progress.

The AMA will be an active commentator and adviser on developments in e-health.

I’d like to turn now to a couple of important areas where the AMA intends to lead community and political debate.”

Comment:

This is a good start indeed for what I believe is the first NPC appearance. Clear recognition of the need for leadership was a really important point to make as well as the preparedness to be involved in discussions etc.

Recognition of the importance of telemedicine – given the size of Australia – was also a well made point!

I look forward to more, in-depth comments, as time goes on.

David.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

E-Health System Finally in Sight?

We had another breathlessly optimistic article from the Australian Financial Review today. This is clearly designed to build on the enthusiastic article on the need for e-Health in the SMH, Age and Brisbane Times on the weekend (Not that is to disagree with that general thrust!).

Health's black hole

July 18, 2009

Billions of dollars are spent on technology to keep people alive but still the left hand does not know what the right hand has done. Mark Metherell looks to the future.

An unexpected legacy has emerged from the near-fatal bashing of Dr Mukesh Haikerwal by thugs with a baseball bat. The former Australian Medical Association president was walking in a park near his Williamstown home in Melbourne late one night in September when the gang set upon him, fracturing his skull.

Haikerwal, 48, was rushed to nearby Western Hospital and spent six days in intensive care before he was transferred to Epworth private hospital. His medical colleagues, he says, "saved my life and put me back into good fettle" but a deep reservation persists. "Whatever has happened is because of their individual efforts, not because of the medical records system."

The GP was startled to learn just how much the inaccessibility of updated medical records affected his care. After high-level treatment at both hospitals, he returned home only to be hit by persistent fatigue. His GP discovered the cause was anaemia. Despite the batteries of blood tests he had in both hospitals, the condition was missed because the lack of continuing record-keeping meant the severity of the declining trend in his red blood cells went unnoticed.

Later, when he had a scan at another hospital to review his condition, it was not possible to compare it with the original scan taken just after the attack because the two systems did not communicate - a "potentially dangerous" disconnection, Haikerwal says.

An eerily similar episode occurred when his mother was admitted to hospital with a suspected heart attack, then transferred to another. She was treated and discharged but failed to mend. Only later was it realised her heart was leaking, a problem missed because unmatchable blood tests performed by different laboratories obscured diagnosis.

The lack of instantly accessible, up-to-the-minute electronic patient records contrasts oddly with the sophisticated lifesaving medical technology routinely available in hospitals. "This is a 19th-century system imposed on a 21st-century system," says Haikerwal, who is a clinical adviser to the National E-Health Transition Authority, a federal-state body.

Lots more here:

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/healths-black-hole-20090717-do8p.html

The AFR article is here:

http://www.afr.com/home/upgrade.aspx?EDP://20090721000031363488

E-health system finally in sight

Tuesday, 21 July 2009 | The Australian Financial Review | Julian Bajkowski

By the end of the year we should know what the prognosis is for the electronic health program, writes Julian Bajkowski.

It’s taken a decade of wrangling, false starts and controversy but doctors across Australia could finally be exchanging vital clinical details of patients over state borders in less than a year.

At least that’s the strategy National E-Health Transition Authority chief executive Peter Fleming plans to pursue.

We are then told.

1. It’s going to be a big sales job.

2. The NHHRC has a part of its agenda a National Electronic Health Record.

3. The Business Case for this was submitted to COAG several months ago and no response so far.

4. That he NHHRC believes 2012 is an achievable time table for the National EHR.

5. Handling privacy will be important and that laws might be in place by mid 2010 to cover this issue.

6. Andrew Howard has been brought back – having been acting CEO – to head strategy.

7. Current identifiers are riddled with ‘literally millions of duplicates, false and non-functioning identities such as those of dead people’

Not a word of this is news as far as I can tell – and essentially funding, privacy and legislative support are still to be sorted out.

I really wonder just what is being spruiked here. I suspect a rear guard action to get some leverage from the NHHRC report release to ask for a whole lot more money? Or am I too cynical?

1000’s of GPs are already happily exchanging results from pathology and radiology using services provided by HealthLink, Argus, Medical Objects, eClinic, proMedicus and the like. Hospitals and specialists that have their acts together can also provide reports and discharge summaries.

e-Prescribing seems to be stumbling forward – in much less than ideal ways in my view – but at least there is some learning going on about what works, what doesn’t etc. NEHTA is, of course, quite un-involved in setting any directions here as well as in the messaging mentioned above.

Read more about how messily this is all happening here:

Battle for e-scrip funds

Karen Dearne | July 21, 2009

THE Pharmacy Guild has a swag of new technology programs in its kitbag as the latest round of pharmacy program funding negotiations kicks off in Canberra.

Electronic prescribing is the big-ticket item, with the guild's half-owned eRx Script Exchange busy signing up pharmacies to the hub while eyeing a potential $60million new market with some 240 million scripts issued annually at a fee of 25c each.

It seems the door may be open to transaction fees, with a federal Health Department spokeswoman saying such payment arrangements may be considered, "taking into account the business efficiencies e-prescribing and dispensing provide".

General practitioners are not so willing to cede control to pharmacy interests.

Instead, doctors are lining up behind a rival system, MediSecure, originally built for a federal government trial in the Northern Territory, and endorsed by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

Essentially, the present scenario boils down to a battle of the software interfaces.

Much more here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25810119-15306,00.html

Why we are not getting the coherence and value from all this work is because those who are meant to be creating the strategic framework for all the various actors in the e-Health domain are essentially out to lunch and have not done their job at all well over the last 5 and a half years. It is just possible we might be seeing some improvements in the last few months with some aspects of this, but right now anything that could be called a national direction is simply absent.

We have the bizarreness of there being a National E-Health Strategy that is secret and unfunded and NEHTA wanting to spend billions when it can’t even make what we presently have conform to some basic rules of interoperation and information exchange.

The message to NEHTA should be very clear – show you can really deliver with the funds you have already been given before daring to ask for more! The time for saying ‘trust us’ is well and truly gone.

If it were not so serious it would be hilarious!

David.

A Useful Initiative Which Is Worth Being Aware Of.

The following was sent to me today – and I thought it was worth passing on.

Youth with disabilities to benefit from online partnership

Media Release

Livewire.org.au and Northcott Disability Services announced today a partnership which will enable young people living with disabilities to better interact online.

Through the Livewire Affiliate Partner Program, Northcott and Livewire are working together to provide young people with disabilities access to additional online services.

Livewire is a free, safe and supportive online community which has been designed especially for young people aged over 10 and under 21 living with a serious illness, chronic health condition or disability.

Livewire Managing Director, Omar Khalifa, said that the new partnership will enable Livewire to better engage with young people living with disabilities.

“Our aim is to create a supportive online community which meets the needs of all our members,” he said. “This partnership will enable Livewire to be more accessible and deliver better outcomes to young people with disabilities.”

Northcott Disability Services provides support and services to more than 6000 people with disabilities, their families and carers across the ACT and NSW.

Northcott Disability Services Senior Manager of Client Programs, Anita Fisher, said that the partnership with Livewire will enable Northcott to reach more young people living with disabilities and, by providing assistive technology through Northcott’s Computer Assistive Technology Service, help them to increase their independence and interaction with the online world.

CATS offers people with disabilities increased independence in the areas of computer access, communication and access to everyday appliances at school, home and work,” she said. “This partnership is an opportunity for Northcott to better support young people with disabilities and to help them get online and interacting with their peers.”

The partnership with Northcott Disability Services reflects other not for profit partnerships that have been successfully operated by Livewire, including partnerships with the Haemophilia Foundation Australia, Muscular Dystrophy NSW, The Spastic Centre and Diabetes Australia.

---- Ends.

About Livewire.org.au

Livewire.org.au is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Starlight Children’s Foundation and is supported by funding from the Australian Government under the Clever Networks Program, Starlight Children’s Foundation and in-kind support from Livewire’s launch partners. For more information on Livewire visit www.livewire.org.au

About Northcott Disability Services

Northcott Disability Services was established as the NSW Society for Crippled Children in 1929 by the Rotary Club of Sydney in response to the growing number of children with polio and tuberculosis. Today, Northcott Disability Services provides support to over 6000 people with a broad range of disabilities and their families across NSW and the ACT by offering a range of quality programs which promote a genuinely inclusive society, In 2009, Northcott proudly celebrates 80 years of supporting people with disabilities reach their full potential. For more information on Northcott visit www.northcott.com.au

If you know of young people that this may help – let them know!

David.

Monday, July 20, 2009

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission Lets Australia Down I Fear.

The following has appeared in the News Ltd papers today. It seems clear this is a set of leaks from the NHHRC Final report.

Health records to go online

Article from The Advertiser

BEN PACKHAM, STEVE LEWIS

July 20, 2009 12:01am

EVERY Australian will be able to see their medical records online and keep a personalised "health diary" in a key reform promising better care and big taxpayer savings.

Family GPs and other medicos will be forced to link patient records to a proposed national database or miss out on Medicare payments, The Advertiser can reveal.

But Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's health reform body has called for patients, and not doctors, to have the ultimate say over who sees their medical records.

......

Central to the reform agenda is the introduction of a national electronic-health system, containing confidential and potentially life-saving information. To maintain privacy standards, medical professionals would have to get patient permission to access the data, which would be dispersed across the country.

New privacy legislation would protect the information from prying eyes. But emergency provisions could allow access to the data in times of medical crisis, such as after a car accident or during a serious allergic reaction.

Giving people access to their own records is seen as vital to ensure consumer acceptance of the proposed e-health revolution.

This would allow individuals to go online and update their medical records and add information relevant to self-management and healthy lifestyles.

Medical professionals have long hoped for a national e-health system, which could save up to $8 billion over 10 years by giving medical professionals better information about patients. The number of medical errors could be cut, chronic disease management would be improved and unnecessary duplication of tests and scans would be eliminated.

Under the commission's recommendations, it is understood every Australian would have an electronic health file by mid-2012, and all health care providers would have to accept data from other providers by January 2013.

Those without internet access would be able to view their records under proposed equality measures.

GPs, specialists, pharmacists and other allied health professionals would become "e-enabled" quickly to ensure the system worked.

The plan to deny Medicare payments to GPs who do not sign up to the system will anger the powerful doctors' lobby which hopes to secure incentives for its members to co-operate.

.....

More here:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25806145-5006301,00.html

In the following I will ignore all the points made other than the e-Health related ones.

On the basis that what is reported, and it is similar to what I have seen in drafts of the Final Report, this seems to be what the NHHRC has in mind.

Let me say clearly and directly I disagree with just about every aspect of these proposals.

To my mind these proposals lack an evidence base, ignore the major benefits cases of e-Health, are impractical as they guaranteed to really annoy most clinicians and suggest timelines that are utterly unrealistic.

I have made the arguments around most of these points here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/05/nhhrc-gets-e-health-very-badly-wrong-at.html

As have others – as covered here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/05/nhhrc-told-to-work-out-what-it-is.html

If the government can’t see that what we need is proper automation of our professional health services with point of care decision support, a dramatic upgrade of standardised, content rich, information flows between the various professional actors (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, allied health and so on), implementation of standardised secure messaging and e-prescribing, improvements in the business of health systems and quality leadership and governance of the way e-Health is managed and delivered we are, to be clear about it – stuffed!

If the final report does not recommend, and the government decide to agree to, run tracks both of implementation of the Deloittes National E-Health Strategy and developing a pragmatic approach to the deployment of Personal Health Records we will wind up in a humongous mess.

Take it from me, medical professionals have not been asking to be forced to contribute to patient held records. They have been asking to be given the tools they need to enable them to do a better job of caring for their patients.

This proposal, if true, is really just ‘magical thinking’ on the part of some very ignorant people in the NHHRC.

All I can do is hope News Corp have got the wrong end of the stick.

David.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Useful and Interesting Health IT News from the Last Week – 19/07/2009.

Again, in the last week, I have come across a few news items which are worth passing on.

First we have:

Privacy fight shaping for eHealth

by James Riley

Monday, 13 July 2009

The battle lines are being drawn for the biggest privacy fight since Joe Hockey’s 2005 smartcard proposal, this time focused on Rudd Government plans for a unique citizen identifier number in the health sector.

There is nothing like a unique identifier number to heat the blood of privacy advocates everywhere: Bob Hawke found out with his Australia Card proposal; Joe Hockey got a taste through the ultimately doomed ‘Not Australia Card’ smartcard; and Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon may be about to learn just how loud the privacy lobby can get.

Roxon and her State counterparts announced plans for national consultations on the legislative framework for the “national healthcare identifier numbers” that will underpin Australia’s e-Health system.

Health is widely acknowledged as the biggest ICT hairball in Government – at any level. The potential savings that could be delivered through an electronic health system encompassing governments, healthcare providers, patients and healthcare centres are enormous.

More here:

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/26246/53/

I think we can be assured this will bubble on while ever the Government does not explain a great deal more about just what is planned, what is the business case supporting the proposal, what other options may exist and what the Privacy Impact assessments said regarding the proposal.

This was followed up here:

Poor eHealth records can cost lives too

by James Riley

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

Australian Government claims that an Individual Healthcare Identifier (IHI) would reduce avoidable deaths in the healthcare system has been dismissed by privacy advocates, who say poor records management was also a problem in eHealth.

In fact, the Australian Privacy Foundation says there is evidence that poorly implemented eHealth systems can actually increase mortality rates caused by patient mismatching. Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon yesterday indicated an IHI could reduce such deaths.

APF Health committee chair Juanita Fernando urged authorities to address the governance and management issues related to eHealth before considering the introduction of unique ID numbers.

“We have nothing against saving lives, but it (eHealth) can cost lives too,” Ms Fernando said. “Poorly implemented eHealth systems can cost lives, and that really needs to be recognised.”

“It is quite clear that there are benefits that eHealth can deliver. But there are definite costs too, and they need to be considered openly and questioned.”

More here:

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/26274/53/

Note also this:

Student ID number under fire over privacy fears

Farrah Tomazin

July 14, 2009

THE movements of every Victorian student through the education system will be tracked by the State Government as part of a multimillion-dollar project that has sparked privacy concerns among parents, teachers and opposition parties.

From this week, thousands of students under the age of 25 will be given a unique student identification number, allowing the state Education Department to monitor them as they progress through primary school, secondary school, or vocational education and training.

Every student's number will be recorded within a central register, providing details such as the child's name, date of birth, sex, enrolment history, and movements between schools.

Education Minister Bronwyn Pike said the project — which is costing taxpayers more than $5 million — would help identify students at risk of dropping out, while ensuring the Government had accurate information on student movement and retention rates. But some fear the plan could result in serious privacy breaches if strict controls are not put in place.

"The question is, who gets access to the information and on what basis?" asked Australian Education Union branch president Mary Bluett.

More here:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/student-id-number-under-fire-over-privacy-fears-20090713-dit9.html

The urge to number people by bureaucrats is certainly pretty strong!

Second we have:

Digital forecast bright

Andrew Colley | July 14, 2009

INFORMATION and communication technology industry groups have welcomed the release today of the federal government's directions paper on the digital economy, but some say it is light on policy leadership.

The result of 12 months of collaboration with the industry, the paper, titled "Australia's Digital Economy: Future Direction", provides a snapshot of what the Labor government thinks a successful digital economy will look like and sets out the roles government and industry should play.

But industry groups say a major element is missing in its 104 pages.

Australian Information Industry Association chief executive Ian Birks said the paper did more to raise challenges facing the digital economy than identify means to address them. He said it lacked detail on measures of the new economy's success and specifics on what government expected from the ICT sector.

"The paper's not heavy with policies or initiatives -- that's clear. It's more of a discussion, but it does do quite a good job setting the scene and it does identify the issues that will need attention," he said.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25777410-5013040,00.html

An interesting report, however the health sector gets only a very brief mention. The only areas discussed seem to be the Bionic Eye and Remote ICU Care.

Third we have:

State support services revamp

Karen Dearne | July 14, 2009

I a reshuffle at NSW Health, former chief information officer Mike Rillstone has been appointed acting chief executive of the Health Support Services arm for an initial six-month period.

The HSS was established last year as the delivery arm for NSW Health's share services program.

Former HSS chief executive John Roach has been appointed chief financial officer, NSW Health.

Meanwhile, former deputy chief information officer Craig Smith is acting CIO of the Strategic Information Management branch. Mr Rillstone would have a "very close working relationship" with Mr Smith and the SIM unit, a NSW Health spokeswoman said.

Late last year, special commissioner Peter Garling ordered a massive and urgent upgrade for the state's public hospital IT infrastructure, and the provision of electronic medical records for all patients.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25776695-15319,00.html

This could be a good move as it gets out of the NSW Health Department the luddite, who all on his own, slowed e-Health in NSW down a very good deal. No names, no packdrill but insiders will know who I mean.

Fourth we have:

Guild offers panacea to drug abuse

Simone Roberts

The Pharmacy Guild of Australia has revealed details of its solution to prescription medication abuse.

Guild president Kos Sclavos told Pharmacy News that the issue could be "addressed overnight" if the Government agreed to implement the Guild's new program called ControlledDrugRx.

The program, based on technology developed for Project STOP, would provide real-time decision support for a pharmacist before dispensing opiates and other addictive pain relievers, as well as optional real-time checks for doctors before prescribing S8 drugs.

Health officials would also be able to access the data, allowing them to monitor health professionals and the patient's S8 records.

"Pharmacists would dispense as they do today and there would be mandatory reporting via this real-time monitoring system. This would make available to pharmacists immediate decision support whether to proceed with the dispensing. Pop up messages to pharmacists would signal if clinically appropriate," Mr Sclavos said.

Full article here:

http://www.pharmacynews.com.au/articles/Guild-offers-panacea-to-drug-abuse_z490326.htm

This should be seen as part of an ongoing push on the part of the Pharmacy Guild to get more funding in the new remuneration agreement with Community Pharmacy. The e-Health aspects the Guild’s initiatives are not consistent with the National E-Health Strategy, and Government support of them should be seen as a sign of desperation to get something happening..messy and un-strategic though their plans may be.

I wonder when we are going to see the NHHRC final report?

Fifth we have:

Tassie goes to market for more e-health

Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au
14 July 2009 05:00 PM
Tags: tasmania, government, e-health, hospital, clinical, hobart, state, tender

Tasmania has gone to market for further e-health services in a continuation of its push to upgrade the health technology capabilities in its hospitals.

The newest request for tender looks for a clinical care system that will first be rolled out at the neo-natal and paediatric intensive care unit of the Royal Hobart Hospital, which has 14 beds and would have 70 users. Its estimated cost for acquisition and implementation is $500,000.

Yet this small implementation could be the start of a larger roll-out. "The department's long-term vision is for a single, state-wide system for critical care medicine that may be deployed to any relevant site within the Department of Health and Human Services," the tender documents said. The time scale for this to happen was five to 10 years.

The system will replace current manual systems with electronic recording of clinical information through direct entry, data collection from different hospital devices and analysis of health information. The system has to interface with other existing and future health systems in the state.

Lots more here:

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Tassie-goes-to-market-for-more-e-health/0,130061733,339297398,00.htm

It is good to see some apparent steady progress.

Sixth we have:

MEDIA RELEASE

14 JULY 2009

Caring and Sharing – The quest to develop a strategy for the sharing of electronic patient records

Media release from Health Informatics New Zealand (HINZ)

The quest to develop a strategy for the sharing of electronic patient records Fisher & Paykel Clinical Education Centre, Auckland City Hospital 8.45 am Friday 24th July 2009

For the past year, Health Informatics New Zealand (HINZ) has been endeavouring to stimulate debate re the development of a national electronic health records strategy.

Development of a viable information sharing strategy is becoming more and more important to the New Zealand health sector. On one hand the pressure on the system to develop safe, reliable and easy to use mechanisms for sharing patient information is mounting.

On the other hand we are becoming more and more aware of the complexities and challenges of doing so.

More here:

http://www.nzdoctor.co.nz/news?article=432e7027-aa23-489b-b65e-bb8d7d3a5a05

It will be very interesting to see what outcomes emerge from this meeting.

Seventh we have:

Simple hearing test a 'lifesaver'

Fran Foo | July 14, 2009

WHEN Michelle Downey decided to take a simple hearing test, little did she know it would save her from complete hearing loss.

Michelle Downey, 45, discovered she had a hearing problem after taking a free hearing test at a mobile kiosk

While at her local shopping centre, the Brisbane mother of four chanced upon a mobile kiosk offering free hearing tests.

The test involved donning a headset and responding to a range of sounds and instructions.

"When you hear a buzz or a beep, you just touch the screen. It was very simple and straightforward and took less than 10 minutes," Ms Downey said.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25776699-5013040,00.html?referrer=email&source=AIT_email_nl

This seems like a useful and sensible innovation which can certainly help people understand if they need further investigation and help.

Eighth we have:

Vic hospital radio tag plan under fire

July 13, 2009 - 8:14AM

Medical staff at the new Royal Children's Hospital are to wear radio tags to allow their movements to be tracked under a secret Victorian government plan.

But the plan has raised the ire of unions, who fear a new precedent for surveillance of employees across the workforce, and by RCH doctors, who have refused to wear the tags when the new hospital opens in 2011, The Age newspaper reports.

Documents it obtained show the control group for the $1 billion hospital reconstruction discussed in January last year a "comprehensive patient and staff radio frequency identification tracking system".

Much more here:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/vic-hospital-radio-tag-plan-under-fire-20090713-dhqf.html

I think there would need to be a clear understanding of just what the valid reason for doing something like this was before it is likely to gain much acceptance. Hospitals seem to have kept track of their staff pretty well to date without things like this.

It seems the staff agree. See here:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/big-brother-hospital-plan-angers-doctors-20090712-dhdy.html

'Big Brother' hospital plan angers doctors

Nick Miller

July 13, 2009

Ninth we have:

Tasmania kicks off NBN plans

Mitchell Bingemann | July 16, 2009

THE Rudd government's ambitious $43 billion national broadband network has taken its first baby-steps towards construction after the federal and Tasmanian governments released competitive tenders for the build in the island state.

Cutting the ribbon at the opening of the Basslink fibre optic cable in Tasmania, federal Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and Premier of Tasmania David Bartlett said a memorandum of understanding had been signed between the respective governments and the state government-owned power utility, Aurora Energy to construct and operate the new fibre-to-the-home network.

A new company, tentatively titled TNBN Co, will be established to undertake the project, with the first sod of soil expected to be turned shortly, the government said. TNBN Co will be a subsidiary of NBN Co jointly owned by Aurora Energy which today issued an open competitive tender for the fibre optic cable needed to build the network.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25791048-15306,00.html

We also have this:

NBN won't cost more than $43bn: Conroy

Correspondents in Canberra | July 15, 2009

COMMUNICATIONS Minister Stephen Conroy has dismissed suggestions the government's planned national broadband network will cost more than its budget of $43 billion.

"I've not met anybody around Australia who has said look ... that's going to blow out in costs," Senator Conroy told ABC television when questioned about the prospect of a budget overrun.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25785154-15306,00.html

And we also have this today:

Telstra help would boost broadband network, Conroy says

The Federal Government has acknowledged it needs Telstra's help to efficiently deliver its planned new National Broadband Network (NBN).

More here

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/19/2629964.htm?section=justin

One has the feeling the overall NBN program is evolving to become something a bit different to what was initially announced.

Lastly the slightly more technical article for the week:

Hints of How Google's OS Will Work

Google isn't saying how its new operating system will function, but the clues lie in its browser.

By Erica Naone

Soon after Google announced plans for its own operating system (OS), called Google Chrome OS, on Tuesday night, the Web giant clammed up about technical details, saying that the project is still at too early a stage. The first netbook devices running Chrome OS won't be released until the second half of 2010, so most users will have to wait until then to find out precisely how the software will work. But that doesn't mean there aren't hints out there already, and the biggest clues can be found in Google's Chrome browser, which the company says will be a key part of the new OS.

According to a post written by Sundar Pichai, a vice president of product management at Google, and Linus Upson, the company's engineering director, the open-source Chrome OS will consist of a Linux kernel with the Google Chrome browser running on top inside an entirely new desktop environment.

The Chrome browser was released nine months ago and is Google's effort to reinvent the browser completely: it's designed from scratch with Web applications in mind and is meant to be the only application that a Web-savvy user needs on her computer.

In an interview in March, Darin Fisher, an engineer on the Google Chrome team, said that in early sessions, the engineers decided to "take a page out of the operating system book" when they built the browser. Notably, the Chrome team decided to treat the browser as a launchpad from which the user can start different Web applications. Each application operates independently so that if one crashes, it doesn't affect the others. OSes, Fisher said, had to take the same approach to allow a single application to crash without requiring a user to reboot the whole system. This change in browser design helps give Web applications the stability that desktop applications enjoy.

Much more here:

http://www.technologyreview.com/web/22987/?nlid=2170

An interesting article explaining, possibly, just where Google is going!

More next week.

David.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Report Watch – Week of 13, July, 2009

on a few interesting reports that are worth a download or browse. This week we have a few.

First we have:

Survey Shows CPOE Lay of the Land

HDM Breaking News, July 2, 2009

A new survey of health care CIOs shows adoption, "at some level," of computerized physician order entry systems is becoming widespread. But full implementation remains years away.

.....

--Joseph Goedert

Full article here :

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/CPOE-38597-1.html

For full survey results, click here.

Second we have:

UnitedHealth Says Existing Technology Can Trim Health Costs

By Bill Kenealy

July 2, 2009

Minneapolis-based UnitedHealth Group says better use of technology can take a bite out of nation's health care tab.

The report, issued by the company's Center for Health Reform and Modernization, says savings of $332 billion in national health expenditure could be realized over the next decade by streamlining administrative processes. The paper contends savings can accrue across entire health care system by modernizing the administrative and transactional aspects of health care. For example, over the next decade the report predicts broader use of automated swipe cards could save $18 billion, creation of a national payment accuracy clearinghouse could save $41 billion, and elimination of paper checks and paper remittance advice could save $109 billion.

More here:

http://www.insurancenetworking.com/news/-12604-1.html

This is, of course, the mother lode for US healthcare where administrative costs consume roughly 30% of total healthcare costs. In Australia a comparable figure is 3-4% I believe.

The press release with link to the full report is here:

http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/news.aspx?id=b2bf4b20-61ef-4064-aae5-1e6c0f5b2759

Third we have:

The robot will see you now

Mobile machines, remote hookups help Lahey Clinic cope with shortage of specialists

BEVERLY - The robot glides past the beeping heart monitor, past a row of patients supine on their electric beds, past the beehive of the nurses’ station. The sleek, metallic body, dusky blue, stops outside Room 9 and slowly rolls through the doorway.

Watch Video Here:

http://www.boston.com/video/viral_page/?/services/player/bcpid14094180001&bctid=28340035001

“Mrs. Morash, Dr. Liesching’s here,’’ says nurse Dawn Deschenes, announcing the arrival of the robot to a gray-haired woman breathing behind an oxygen mask. The face of Timothy Liesching, a pulmonary critical care doctor, gazes at his patient from a computer screen on top of the robot.

“I’m just going to look in your monitor now,’’ says Liesching, his voice flowing from a speaker on the robot even though he is sitting in his office at the Lahey Clinic in Burlington, 22 miles - and one large traffic snarl - away. The computer swivels away from her face. “Your oxygen looks good, your respiratory rate looks pretty good.’’

More here:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/07/03/mobile_machines_remote_hookups_help__lahey_clinic_cope_with_shortage_of_specialists/

The fun here is to watch the robot – really amazing stuff.

Fourth we have:

HIMSS white paper: "usability" critical to adoption of EMRs

July 02, 2009 | Kyle Hardy, Community Editor

CHICAGO – The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society's EHR Usability Task Force has released a white paper focusing on the level of usability in electronic medical records and their implementation at healthcare organizations.

"Defining and Testing EMR Usability: Principles and Proposed Methods of EMR Usability Evaluation and Rating" identifies usability of software in an EMR as “one of the major factors and possibly the most important factor hindering widespread adoption of EMRs.”

“Through our research, we found that usability as a requirement in the certification process could benefit product development for more usable EMR products and give users or decision-makers more confidence in selecting clinical EMR systems,” said Jeffery L. Belden, MD, associate professor of clinical medicine at the University of Missouri Health Care's School of Medicine and chairman of the HIMSS EHR Usability Task Force.

Article continues here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/himss-white-paper-usability-critical-adoption-emrs

The report is here:

http://www.himss.org/content/files/HIMSS_DefiningandTestingEMRUsability.pdf

This is really utterly invaluable stuff!

Fifth we have:

The medical home – A foundation for transformation

Replacing poorly coordinated, acute-focused, episodic care with coordinated, proactive, preventive, acute, chronic, long-term and end-of-life care is foundational to the transformation of the U.S. healthcare system. Many believe this can be best accomplished by strengthening primary care and having primary care provider-led (PCP) care delivery teams working at the "top of their licenses" — at the level for which they are qualified and licensed.

One approach to transforming primary care is the patient-centered medical home (PCMH), or the "medical home" — an enhanced primary-care model that provides comprehensive and timely care with appropriate reimbursement, emphasizing the central role of teamwork and engagement by those receiving care.

The PCMH is a model that can be implemented immediately to help address increasing healthcare costs, poor or inconsistent quality and inaccessibility to timely care.

The article is found here:

http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/html/gbs-medical-home.html?open&cm_mmc=5555-_-n-_-vrm_newsletter-_-10165_120052&cmibm_em=dm:0:8862580

I am sure IBM is keen word gets out on this report.

Sixth we have:

World Hospital Information Systems Market

This report analyzes the worldwide markets for Hospital Information Systems in US$ Millions. The specific product segments analyzed are Clinical Information Systems (CIS), and Non-Clinical Information Systems (NCIS). The report provides separate comprehensive analytics for the US, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of World. Annual forecasts are provided for each region for the period of 2006 through 2015. A six-year historic analysis is also provided for these markets. The report profiles 303 companies including many key and niche players worldwide such as Agfa-Gevaert bv, Akhil Systems Pvt. Ltd., Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc., AxSys Technology Ltd., Brunie-Software GmbH, Cerner Corporation, Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., Eclipsys Corporation, GE Healthcare, Healthland, IBA Health Ltd., iSOFT Group PLC, Integrated Medical Systems Pty Ltd., Keane’s Healthcare Solutions, McKesson Corporation, Medical Information Technology, Inc., MEDISTAR Praxiscomputer GmbH, Philips Nederland bv Medical Systems, QuadraMed Corporation, Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Softlink International Pvt. Ltd., Sysmex Corporation, and Sysmex (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd. Market data and analytics are derived from primary and secondary research. Company profiles are mostly extracted from URL research and reported select online sources.

Much more here:

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0109892/World-Hospital-Information-Systems-Market.html?utm_source=MRKW&utm_medium=PR&utm_campaign=MRKW

Looks pretty comprehensive if you have $US3950 to spend!

Seventh we have:

EU-policy Initiative on Telemedicine: Why and how?

Thursday, 09 July 2009

The Commission issued on 30th June 2009 an explanatory document that includes details of the extensive consultation process which led to the 'Communication on telemedicine for the benefit of patients, healthcare systems and society' adopted on 4th November 2008. The telemedicine communication proposed a set of actions aimed at enabling wider deployment of telemedicine services, focusing on three main priorities:

  • building confidence and acceptance of telemedicine services,
  • bringing legal clarity, and
  • facilitating market development.

The newly issued (30th June 2009) document (Commission staff working paper) expands on certain aspects of the communication, such as the outcome of the extensive consultation phase that was undertaken in preparation of the initiative, the policy context and the relevant legal aspects. It also illustrates with concrete examples how wider deployment of telemedicine can affect individual patients, healthcare systems and society.

More here:

http://www.ehealthnews.eu/content/view/1660/27/

Lots of stuff on these links.

Reference documents:

Last for the week

Comparative-effectiveness reports set high bar

By Shawn Rhea / HITS staff writer

Posted: July 8, 2009 - 10:30 am EDT

Two sweeping advisory committee reports providing guidance for creating a national comparative-effectiveness research program set an ambitious agenda and could mark the turning point for the delivery of patient care in the U.S., said healthcare industry experts familiar with the reports.

Those same experts acknowledged, however, that the recommendations may have done little to quell concerns about the ultimate use of comparative-effectiveness research or answer questions about when providers and patients would be able to access such information to guide treatment decisions.

Watch the related video of Carolyn Clancy, director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, discussing her role on the 15-person Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Released last week by the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Institute of Medicine, the two reports offer direction for how HHS should spend the $400 million it received in February for the creation of a program comparing the outcomes of various disease-treatment and care-delivery programs. The money was part of a two-year, $1.1 billion comparative-effectiveness funding package allocated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were given the balance of the money, receiving $400 million and $300 million, respectively.

Lots more here (registration required)

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090708/REG/307089995

The first report is here:

http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf

and the second is here:

http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3809/63608/71025.aspx

This is all a big deal and will help sort out just what treatments actually work and make a measurable difference in a vast number of patients. Just like the UK has NICE we need the same here!

And finally – for reference:

http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2649_34631_12968734_1_1_1_37407,00.html

OECD Health Data 2009: Statistics and Indicators for 30 Countries

Follow links for lots of data

Enough for one week!

Enjoy!

David.

Friday, July 17, 2009

International News Extras For the Week (13/07/2009).

Again there has been just a heap of stuff arrive this week.

First we have:

Paperless health care? A hospital's long journey

By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer Lauran Neergaard, Ap Medical Writer Mon Jul 6, 3:29 pm ET

PITTSBURGH – Baby Riley Matthews wheezed noisily on the exam table. "He's belly-breathing," the emergency-room doctor said worriedly — Riley's little abdomen was markedly rising and falling with each breath, a sign of respiratory distress.

In most emergency rooms, the doctor would grill Mom: Has he ever been X-rayed? Do you remember what it showed? But in the new all-digital Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, doctors just clicked on a COW — a "computer on wheels" that rolls to each patient's side. Up popped every test and X-ray the 6-month-old has ever had.

This is the eerily paperless hospital of the future, what the "electronic medical record" that President Barack Obama insists will transform what health care looks like.

No chart full of doctors' scribbles hanging on the bed. No hauling around envelopes full of X-rays. No discharge with a prescription slip. Even the classic ER patient list has changed from the white-board of TV-drama fame to a giant computer screen.

By the best count, only 1.5 percent of the nation's roughly 6,000 hospitals use a comprehensive electronic record.

Even that statistic belies how hard it will be for health care to jettison its 19th-century filing system by 2014, the federal government's goal — despite the $19 billion that the economic stimulus package is providing to help doctors start. It took Children's seven hard years and more than $10 million to evolve a system that lets its doctors check on patients with a few mouse clicks from anywhere and use speedily up-to-date records in directing their care.

"Sometimes before I even see the ER patient, the X-ray is in here and finished and read," said Dr. Jonathan Bickel, the ER attending physician who whipped out his laptop to check on Riley's overnight stay. Not too long ago, "I had to take mom's word for it."

Look, he pointed: An outpatient lung specialist tested Riley for cystic fibrosis just before his mother brought the 6-month-old to the emergency room. The specialist's detailed exam notes hit the ER computer in hours, not the days it takes to transcribe into a paper chart. Cystic fibrosis didn't cause his wheezing; quick, test for something else.

Still, Children's evolution isn't finished.

Pages more here:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090706/ap_on_he_me/us_med_healthbeat_paperless_hospital

This is a good short review of the reasons why we need this stuff and how hard it can be.

Second we have:

Important steps forward at health ministers’ meeting

“We can free up millions of hospital beds and avoid millions of incorrect prescriptions. There is an enormous potential in eHealth”, said Minister for Health and Social Affairs Göran Hägglund at a press conference on the second day of the informal ministerial meeting in Jönköping on 7 July. Also taking part in the press conference were Minister for Elderly Care and Public Health Maria Larsson and Commissioner Androulla Vassiliou, responsible for health issues at the European Commission.

Minister for Health and Social Affairs Göran Hägglund, Minister for Elderly Care and Public Health Maria Larsson, and Commissioner Androulla Vassiliou took part in the press conference

What is known as ‘eHealth’ involves investment in modern IT systems in order to improve both patient safety and quality of care, as well as accessibility and efficiency within healthcare.

Besides eHealth, other issues on the agenda for the two days were antibiotic resistance, preparedness for pandemic influenza, patients’ rights when seeking healthcare in other EU countries, and prevention of alcohol related harm.

More here:

http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/7/7/important_steps_forward_at_health_ministers_meeting

Seems like e-Health is top of the Health Agenda for the Swedish Presidency of the European Union – and a good thing too!

Third we have:

Patient records should be given to Microsoft or Google, say Tories

NHS patient records would be outsourced to Microsoft or Google under Tory plans, instead of being held on a central government database.

By Chris Irvine
Published: 7:00AM BST 06 Jul 2009

The Conservatives, who have close links with Google, argue that developing a database would be unnecessarily expensive, and it would be more beneficial to hold the information on secure systems which already exist, such as Microsoft Healthvault or Google Health. Patients would be given the choice of storing their records with private companies, although it is not yet clear what would happen to the notes of patients who do not consent.

The Tories estimate that if data were outsourced to sites such as these, the country would save half of the £1.65 billion it spends on IT annually.

Under the plans, which emerged yesterday, medical staff with appriopriate access would log on when necessary, although it does raise issues over security.

David Cameron, leader of the Conservatives, has previously singled out the "Electronic Patient Records system" as an example of the government's wasteful spending.

Winning a contract for medical records would guarantee revenue for Google or Microsoft for years, while it would also help increase the use of their technology in healthcare.

Reporting continues here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/google/5753071/Patient-records-should-be-given-to-Microsoft-or-Google-say-Tories.html

I will leave others to comment on the value of this proposal.

Fourth we have:

Saving the healthcare industry: EMRs are the 'beginning, not the end'

July 01, 2009 | Chip Means, Web Editor

CAMBRIDGE, MA – Economically healthy industries empower workers to make decisions, compensate based on productivity and use a lot of information technology. The healthcare industry doesn't do any of this – yet.

Stimulus funds for IT could save the day and the economy, according to Harvard economics professor and Obama campaign advisor David Cutler, who spoke at the Tuesday afternoon session of the HIT Symposium at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

Every industry except healthcare has figured out how to become more efficient by replacing administrative work with information technology, he said. Nurses spend a third of their time documenting – a procedure Cutler said often involves printing digitized information and re-entering it into another IT system.

With the right IT systems and processes, he said, the business of healthcare could change to focus more on compensation and empowerment, making hospitals and practices more profitable.

Much more here (registration required):

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/saving-healthcare-industry-emrs-are-beginning-not-end

You would not be surprised to hear I think young Cutler is onto something!

Fifth we have:

Telethinking and the Nigerian health sector

By Olajide Adebola

OVER the past decade medicine has witnessed a substantial change in technological complexity and the reduction in cost of information communications technology (ICT) has resulted in a symbiotic relationship between the healthcare and ICT sector. Globally, the information age has transformed how we rethink, redesign and rework how businesses and public services operate, aimed at improving productivity, effectiveness and efficiency both internally and in external relationship with clients, customers, suppliers and partners. Recent advances in information and communication technology and the dissemination of networked data processing have led to widespread access to information resources and globalisation of communications, businesses and services.

Internet-based ICT solutions have brought about the greatest impact and they are rapidly changing the way health organisations, providers, care plans, payers, regulators and consumers access information, acquire health products and services, deliver care and communicate with each other. In the health sector, this trend is expressed by the growing consolidation of 'eHealth'- an area rapidly growing in health today distinguished by the utilisation of electronic communication and information technology to transmit, store, and retrieve digital data for clinical, educational and administrative purposes at the local and distance site.

The essence of eHealth is reliable transaction delivery in a fast changing environment involving people, processes and a service or business infrastructure focused on the ill or healthy citizen. Emerging eHealth applications are oriented to professional networking, integration of the clinical care process management and provision of web-based health information and patient care including remote monitoring and healthcare. This expanded view of ICT in health sector has been promoted as the final stage in bringing online the entire healthcare industry. eHealth solutions have emulated e-commerce and e-government strategies and experiences in using internet-based networked technologies to provide healthcare services.

Today in Nigeria, the use of e-commerce and e-business strategies is already being deployed in major sectors like Banking, Oil & Gas, Manufacturing etc while the health sector is yet to fully witness the emulation of these tools to provide efficient health services. The health sector is an enterprise characterised by the use of information for every decision taken. eHealth deployment in our health sector will provide opportunities for individuals, medical professionals and healthcare providers to obtain information, communicate with professionals, deliver first-line support especially where distance is a critical factor (telemedicine) and promote preventive medicine programmes.

Our health system in Nigeria faces so many challenges which can be summarised as: a lack of resources; poor utilisation of the resources available; a high disease burden, driven by HIV/AIDS, malaria and other infectious diseases, contributing to high infant and maternal mortality and morbidity; poverty driven by poor health that robs the society of its most productive sectors, while driving up the birth rate, robbing families of a chance to get out of poverty; shortage of educational capacity in the rural health care settings, exacerbated by the brain drain of talent to the urban centres and abroad; a lack of capacity to gather and process health statistics with which to target health spending and resources. Traditional healers and birth attendants are outside the health care system, but they have closer relationships with the patients at the village level than do the western-oriented doctors and nurses. The combination of these factors makes the achievement of MDG and the national health sector reform goals unlikely without some creative approaches.

Much, much more here:

http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/editorial_opinion/article03/indexn2_html?pdate=060709&ptitle=Telethinking%20and%20the%20Nigerian%20health%20sector

Nashville: The New Hotbed for Health IT Innovation

Carrie Vaughan, for HealthLeaders Media, July 7, 2009

There are only a handful of regions in the United States that have the knowledge base, capital access, local leadership, and infrastructure to be the innovative leader in health IT. And Nashville, TN, is a "tremendous contender," said David Brailer, MD, PhD, chairman of San Francisco, CA-based Health Evolution Partners, during the Nashville Health Care Council's forum on health information technology and the economic stimulus held nearly two weeks ago.

It has been awhile since we've heard from Brailer, the former National Coordinator of HIT. He joked how arriving in Nashville on Southwest Airlines was a completely different experience than his last visit when he arrived on Air Force One. Brailer was joined by William W. Stead, MD, associate vice chancellor for strategy and transformation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Don E. Detmer, MD, president and CEO of the American Medical Informatics Association, and Dave Goetz, Jr., commissioner for the department of finance and administration for the State of Tennessee.

Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, who is the chief medical officer and president of clinical services at HCA and was recently named chair of the Department of Health and Human Services Health Information Technology Standards Committee, moderated the panel.

The panel focused on three questions:

  • How to make the HIT investment in the stimulus package the most effective?
  • Are the goals realistic?
  • Will the increased regulation of the HITECH Act stifle innovation?

Much more here:

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/print/content/235533/topic/WS_HLM2_TEC/Nashville-The-New-Hotbed-for-Health-IT-Innovation.html

Not something I had ever thought of when thinking of Nashville!

Seventh we have:

Lawsuit claims stimulus act puts privacy in jeopardy

July 02, 2009 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

WHITE PLAINS, NY – A class action lawsuit claims the stimulus act jeopardizes the privacy rights of the 65 percent of Americans who aren't on Medicaid or Medicare by requiring healthcare providers to create an electronic health record of every person in the United States. The lawsuit seeks an injunction to protect personal health information and to prevent the defendants from disbursing the $22 billion budgeted for the electronic health records systems.

Lead plaintiff Beatrice M. Heghmann, a healthcare professional who has never been covered by Medicare and Medicaid, says because Title XIII of the stimulus act aims to have everyone's medical histories in the system by 2014, their personal health information would be a "mouse click away from being accessible to an intruder."

Heghmann has sued Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, White House Office of Health Reform Director Nancy-Ann Deparle and Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Charlene Frizzera.

Much more here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/suit-claims-stimulus-act-puts-privacy-jeopardy

As they say – only in America!

Eighth we have:

Medical center seeks 'Holy Grail' of mobile devices

Mount Sinai needs voice capability, access to medical records

Matt Hamblen

July 1, 2009 (Computerworld) Andrew Pizzimenti is in search of the Holy Grail of mobile devices.

Pizzimenti is senior director for voice and data services at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, part of the Mount Sinai Medical Center in Manhattan. His mission is to find the ideal personal computing and mobile phone device for health practitioners.

Pizzimenti said he isn't sure whether this device is a smartphone, an e-book reader or a netbook, and he thinks it might take a while to find the right one.

"I'm seeking the Holy Grail now," Pizzimenti said in a virtual interview from the Cisco Live user conference in San Francisco today. He said he wants a device that would give health professionals access to electronic patient records, but also give them one phone number, instead of the several numbers on several devices they already have.

Full article here:

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135078/Medical_center_seeks_Holy_Grail_of_mobile_devices?taxonomyId=140&intsrc=kc_top&taxonomyName=hardware_and_devices

Certainly one total device that does it all makes sense. Might be a complicated little beast however!

Ninth we have:

CDC launches public health tracking Web site

By Jessica Zigmond / HITS staff writer

Posted: July 7, 2009 - 10:00 am EDT

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has launched a Web-based tool that allows scientists, health professionals and members of the public to track environmental exposures and chronic health conditions. Known as the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, the site brings together environmental information from across the country—including air and water pollutants, as well as information for certain chronic conditions, including asthma, cancer, childhood lead poisoning and heart disease—in one resource.

“The ability to examine many data sets together for the first time has already resulted in faster responses to environmental health issues,” said Howard Frumkin, director of the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, in a news release. “We believe the Tracking Network holds the potential to shed new light on some of our biggest environmental health questions.”

More here (registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090707/REG/307079992

This certainly looks like a very useful initiative.

Tenth we have:

Data-miners claim marketing used to improve quality

By Gregg Blesch / HITS staff writer

Posted: July 7, 2009 - 10:00 am EDT

The courts delivered new setbacks to companies that mine prescribing data and sell information about the habits of individual physicians as a marketing tool for pharmaceutical companies, a practice banned by laws passed in three Northeast states. But the industry will continue to make its case that the bans are bad policy regardless of whether they ultimately prove constitutional.

On June 29, the Supreme Court declined to review a case challenging a pioneering 2006 New Hampshire law that banned the use of prescriber-specific data for marketing. In the previous week, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to stop a similar Vermont law from going into effect July 1 pending the outcome of the industry's appeal of an April decision upholding the law.

A ban in Maine was struck down by a district court, but that case is on appeal in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the same court that previously upheld the New Hampshire law after it was similarly judged by the lower court.

More here (registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090707/REG/307079994

I certainly this all presages the beginning of the end for these people!

Eleventh for the week we have:

Care Card Technology Improves Health System's Patient Flow and Waiting Time

Sarah Kearns, for HealthLeaders Media, July 6, 2009

At Heritage Valley Health System in Beaver, PA, patient flow was a major concern, as it has been for many facilities nationwide.

The facility was well aware of the long process patients had to go through to be seen by a physician. In 2006, it implemented electronic kiosks along with a Care Card to help the registration process move more efficiently and maintain constant patient flow.

"Modeled in part on successful implementations in both the airline and hospitality industries, the board and senior management of Heritage Valley developed a strategic plan for enabling and promoting greater consumer participation in the healthcare process through various self-service initiatives," says Robert Swaskoski, director of enterprise resource systems at HVHS.

The Care Card, a plastic ID card that comes in two sizes, one to put in your wallet and the other to snap on a keychain, uses a bar code with a unique identifying number that assists in patient identification at the initial point of registration. The card also functions as a portal that patients use to access their personal care records for HVHS.

Upon scanning the Care Card at a kiosk, the patient is reminded of any tests or exams scheduled for the day. Also, the patient can give any required information at the kiosk.

More here :

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/235448/topic/WS_HLM2_TEC/Care-Card-Technology-Improves-Health-Systems-Patient-Flow-and-Waiting-Time.html

And – as the article explains – it also saves money!

Twelfth we have:

eHealth scandal reaches Premier's inner circle

Sarah Kramer received a bonus of $114,000 five months after starting her job as eHealth CEO.

For $327 an hour, one former aide wrote to another former aide

June 11, 2009

Tanya Talaga

Robert Benzie

Rob Ferguson

Queen's Park Bureau

Key members of Dalton McGuinty's inner circle are surfacing in the eHealth Ontario spending scandal, documents obtained by the Star show.

Premier Dalton McGuinty's former health adviser was paid $327 an hour by eHealth to, among other tasks, correspond with McGuinty's former chief of staff in his new capacity at a polling firm on "eHealth Ontario priorities," billing records demonstrate.

Karli Farrow was paid $10,646 for 32.5 hours of eHealth work as a Courtyard Group consultant over a period of three weeks in January.

Farrow, a one-time chief of staff to former health minister George Smitherman, had previously served as McGuinty's health policy adviser and was an architect of the Liberals' health-care platform for the 2003 election. She has worked with McGuinty periodically since 2000, including a stint as his director of policy and research, beginning in 2004. She left Smitherman's office in 2007.

More here:

http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/article/649032

This really is the scandal that just keeps on giving!

Thirteenth we have:

Most Wired survey shows hospitals are tightening their IT belts

July 07, 2009 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

CHICAGO – The economy is forcing hospitals to consider delaying or scaling back their IT projects, according to a survey of America’s “most wired” hospitals and health systems.

The Most Wired Survey, conducted annually by Hospitals & Health Networks magazine, the journal of the American Hospital Association, found that even with incentives being made available to implement IT, hospitals still have a long way to go.

Officials at the hospitals surveyed said they are torn between building on their IT successes while also being aware of their budgets.

“The economic slowdown is forcing hospitals to look closely at IT spending,” said Alden Solovy, executive editor of Hospitals & Health Networks. “Most Wired hospitals are doing their best to stay the course.”

“Hospitals clearly recognize that in spite of smaller budgets they still need to invest in IT and position themselves for the future,” said Sunny Sanyal, president of McKesson Provider Technologies. “We’re seeing hospitals reprioritize. For example, instead of continuing with plans to build a new data center extension, a hospital now may choose to redirect funds to other technologies.”

More here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/most-wired-survey-shows-hospitals-are-tightening-their-it-belts

Hardly a surprise – and good to see they are pushing on as best they can!

Fourteenth we have:

Will Providers Bite Off More Than They Can Chew When It Comes to CPOE?

Lisa Eramo, for HealthLeaders Media, July 7, 2009

If you had to begin implementing computerized physician order entry (CPOE) today, how many years do you think it would take for you to reach 100% adoption? This was one of several questions that the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives posed to 335 of its CIO members in a June CPOE survey.

Of the 316 respondents who answered the question, only 8.5% of the respondents said full adoption could be achieved in a year. More than a third (34.5%) of respondents estimated a three-year timeframe.

These survey results hint at the challenges that many hospitals hoping to take full advantage of the EHR incentives outlined in ARRA are facing. Providers must implement CPOE for "all order types, including medication [inpatient and outpatient]" by 2011, according to the proposed meaningful use matrix that the Health Information Technology Policy Committee released last month. The specific measure that hospitals must report is the percentage of orders entered directly by physicians through CPOE.

And it all goes back to the very first goal outlined in the matrix: improve quality, safety, and efficiency of healthcare as well as reduce health disparities. The idea is that CPOE will help to get the ball rolling toward many of these important patient care goals.

Much more here:

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/235578/topic/WS_HLM2_COM/Will-Providers-Bite-Off-More-Than-They-Can-Chew-When-It-Comes-to-CPOE.html

A good question indeed. Well referenced article.

Fifteenth we have:

MobileHealthWatch.com

is dedicated to point of care and mobile health news and resources.

On Demand: Boost Nurse Efficiency with Voice over Wireless LAN

Date:

This Web seminar will explore how leading hospitals throughout the world use Voice over Wireless LAN (VoWLAN) technology to save nurses time throughout their day, attract and retain top nursing talent and optimize workflows throughout the facility. Read »

Video: Stimulus Package for Telehealth

Date:

The U.S. government is now making millions of dollars in grant funding available for organizations that implement technology-based solutions including telehealth. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) provides measurable financial and clinical benefits, including enabling patients to receive in-home care, which is a more efficient use of healthcare system resources; reducing hospitalization and readmission rates because clinicians can identify changes in patients' health before conditions become acute; decreasing the frequency of in-home visits, which also reduces staff travel time; and increasing patients' compliance with their care plans, leading to lower costs and improved efficiencies. Learn what's possible with future RPM technologies. Read »

Vastly more here:

http://www.mobilehealthwatch.com/allresources

Lots of interesting links and articles.

Sixteenth we have:

Wi-Fi Health Care Systems to Hit $4.9B

Driven by $20 billion in stimulus funds for digital medical records, a research firm sees a boom for Wi-Fi RTLS hardware and software, access points, managed services, and pure Wi-Fi and dual-band handsets.

Worldwide sales of Wi-Fi-enabled health care products will hit $4.9 billion in 2014, according to ABI Research, an increase of nearly 70 percent over 2009 levels. The predicted boom is based on the $20 billion of stimulus funds dedicated to the digitizing of medical records and Congress' pending health care reforms.

Increased Wi-Fi penetration in hospitals and health care systems is expected to result in reductions in operating costs, a theme stressed by the Obama administration in its health care initiatives.

"It’s a pretty big business,” ABI Research Vice President Stan Schatt said in a statement. "The strong uptake of Wi-Fi in the health industry is underpinned by its need for improved asset management, staff mobility, transfer of digitized records, and standardized administration of medications. In addition, government security requirements including HIPAA often mean replacing older wireless equipment with modern versions."

Much more here:

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/WiFi-Healthcare-Systems-to-Hit-49B-878082/

Sounds like a lot of growth!

Fourth last we have:

Panasonic breaks into robotics with medical robot

TOKYO (AP) — Panasonic said Tuesday has developed a medical robot that dispenses drugs to patients, the Japanese electronics giant's first step into robotics.

Panasonic will sell the robot to Japanese hospitals next March and will market it in the United States and Europe later. Panasonic spokesman Akira Kadota said the robot will cost several tens of millions of yen (hundreds of thousands of dollars).

"This robot is the first in our robotics project. It sorts out injection drugs to patients, saving time for pharmacists," said Kadota.

The robot does not look humanoid. "It looks like a cabinet with lots of small drawers," he said.

Much more here:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/robotics/2009-07-07-panasonic-robot_N.htm

These robots just keep coming!

Third last we have:

Kaiser Permanente Project Proves Electronic Health Information and Care Coordination Improves Chronic Disease Management

Posted : Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:01:18 GMT

Author : Kaiser Permanente

Category : Press Release

News Alerts by Email ( click here )

News | Home

Proactive E-Consults by Specialists Reduce Late Nephrology Referrals HONOLULU, July 9

HONOLULU, July 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Specialty care physicians can improve the health of high-risk patients by reviewing electronic health records and proactively providing e-consultations and treatment plan recommendations with primary care physicians, according to a Kaiser Permanente paper published online in the British Medical Journal.

The quality improvement project at Kaiser Permanente demonstrated that specialists can take a more active role in managing the health of populations with chronic illness - in this case, kidney disease - by using electronic health records to coordinate care among primary and specialty care providers. In the project, nephrologists (kidney specialists) proactively consulted remotely with primary care doctors to help manage patients at risk for end-stage renal disease.
Much more here:

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/kaiser-permanente-project-proves-electronic,887142.shtml

Very interesting. Pity the BMJ has locked the article from non-subscribers.

Second last for the week we have:

Story claims proprietary EMRs could 'screw up' health reform

July 9, 2009 — 12:13pm ET | By Neil Versel

Washington Monthly, an influential magazine among left-leaning, inside-the-Beltway types, offers a bombshell of an indictment of major EMR vendors in its July cover story, provocatively titled, "Code Red -- How software companies could screw up Obama's health care reform." Author Phillip Longman, who wrote a book about the VistA EMR at the Department of Veterans Affairs, makes the case for open-source software in the coming stimulus-driven EMR spending frenzy by comparing the experiences of Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.

....

The story isn't up yet on the Washington Monthly site, but we can't wait to hear what Cerner and its big-name brethren have to say about this story. Meantime:

- check out the blog of open-source booster Dr. Scott Shreeve, who includes the full text of the article
- read this Forbes interview with the CIO of Midland Memorial
- have a look at this Associated Press story that paints Children's in a much more favorable light

More here:

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/story-claims-proprietary-emrs-could-screw-health-reform/2009-07-09?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

I can see this setting the hares running!

Last, and very usefully, we have:

System failure?

The £12.7bn NHS computer programme is five years behind schedule and beset by criticism, viruses and fears over patient privacy. So should the world's biggest IT project be scrapped? Andy Beckett investigates

At some point last November, an infection began to spread unnoticed through the three hospitals that make up Barts and The London NHS Trust in east London. This was not MRSA but the Mytob worm, a common but potent computer virus. It steadily slowed and choked the 4,700 PCs of the trust's network. By noon on 17 November, a Monday, the network was effectively crippled.

The following day, the trust declared an "internal major incident". Ambulances carry-ing accident and emergency patients were diverted to other hospitals. Operations were postponed. The appointments system was suspended. Access to clinical information - usually quick and electronic - was maintained only by the slowest and most old-fashioned of methods: "runners" drafted in from the trust's administrative departments pounded the hospitals' endless twisting corridors with paper notes and printouts.

Scores of computer technicians from the private sector and from other London NHS trusts were brought in to eradicate the virus, but the PCs had to be decontaminated one by one. It was a week before the crisis was officially declared over, and a fortnight before the hospitals, some of the busiest in the capital, returned to normal. Afterwards, an official report found the virus had been able to infiltrate them because their anti-virus software "did not reach all [their] PCs and ... was configured incorrectly on some". The whole episode, the report concluded, had been "entirely avoidable".

Much more here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/jul/09/nhs-computer-programme-failure

This gives a good flavour of the concerns that are out and about in the UK at present.

There is an amazing amount happening. Enjoy!

David.