Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

What Is All This About Portugal Being A Model for E-Health? It Is just Nonsense with No Offence To Portugal Intended!

The following appeared a couple of days ago.

Portuguese model for e-health rollout: e-health records on a national scale

THE federal Health Department is looking to Portugal for direction in its e-health rollout, deputy secretary Rosemary Huxtable says.

"A number of countries are engaged in developing e-health records on a national scale," she told a Senate estimates hearing.

"In fact, I've recently had discussions with representatives of the government of Portugal, which is doing very similar work.

"Certainly the Scandinavian countries are well advanced in that regard, and France has been doing work in that area. Of course, large private insurers in the US like Kaiser Permanente have systems serving greater populations than ours."

Queensland Liberal senator Sue Boyce had queried whether there was a PCEHR (personally controlled electronic health record) system running anywhere in the world.

A Health statement to PCEHR contract bidders in January said there was "no single solution in place that meets all of the specifications. But every single component has been implemented successfully somewhere".

Ms Huxtable said Australia had been alive to international experience, and the risks and benefits of various approaches.

"Our design is very much a combination of top-down in terms of standards setting and the foundations, but also bottom-up where information is drawn in a live sense from existing systems into the e-health record," she said.

"Rather than having a single national repository, it's a process of aggregating information and using indexing technology (so medical providers) can view health summaries.

"I certainly took out of my discussions with the Portuguese that they were doing something quite similar and had come to it via a similar route."

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/portuguese-model-for-e-health-rollout-e-health-records-on-a-national-scale/story-e6frgakx-1226013719205

Now I had not heard of Portugal (one of those economically crippled PIIGS some may recall) as being a major force or leader in e-Health.

As luck would have it I came upon a brand new review on e-Health in the EU.

European Countries on their Journey Towards National eHealth Infrastructures

Thursday, 24 February 2011

Since the publication of the European Commission's (EC) eHealth Action Plan in 2004, eHealth has gained significant momentum across Europe. "European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures - evidence of progress and recommendations for cooperative actions" is the title of a just released overview and synthesis report on eHealth in Europe. In addition, more than 30 individual reports detailing policy actions and deployment of eHealth applications in Member States and other European countries are available there as well.

The summary report traces European countries' progress along the goals set out in the eHealth Action Plan. It focuses on the core applications of EHR-like/patient summary and ePrescription systems. It also analyses governance, structural and legal issues as well as policy lifecycle aspects.

Study results show that in virtually all European countries surveyed, political as well as stakeholder interest in eHealth policies, and the planning and implementation of national or regional infrastructures has strengthened considerably. This concerns not so much the number of new priority objectives identified, infrastructure elements tackled or pilots run, but rather the overall level of awareness, activities and concrete undertakings. EC as well as Member State initiated activities and co-operations like epSOS or the eHealth Governance Initiative have both significantly contributed to this state of affairs and are witness thereof.

As PÄ“teris Zilgalvis, Head of the EC's ICT for Health Unit commented, "Europe is experiencing a strong political momentum to advance eHealth solutions for the benefit of both its citizens and health systems. The recommendations for further actions submitted in this study are based on a thorough analysis of eHealth strategies and implementation activities in European countries as well as the results of a validation workshop in September 2010 in Brussels ... now the challenge is to cooperatively address the issues identified."

empirica Communication and Technology Research, with more than 20 years of experience in research on eHealth and telemedicine topics, coordinated the study. The Finnish partner institute THL (National Institute for Health and Welfare), legal specialists from the law firm Time.lex and Professor Denis Protti (University of Victoria, Canada), contributed domain expertise. The study's communication efforts and final validation workshop were supported by the communication agency EMC Consulting Group.

A host of experts as well as reviewers from the i2010 Subgroup on eHealth contributed their intimate knowledge of the eHealth situation in their respective countries and validated the content of the country reports. This comprehensive collection of country information constitutes a unique resource and important database of up to date evidence on eHealth progress across Europe, which updates and complements the results of the earlier eHealth ERA study of 2007.

Download European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures - evidence of progress and recommendations for cooperative actions (.pdf, 1.060 KB).

Download from eHealthNews.eu Portal's mirror: European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures - evidence of progress and recommendations for cooperative actions (.pdf, 1.060 KB).

The release is here:

http://www.ehealthnews.eu/publications/latest/2494--european-countries-on-their-journey-towards-national-ehealth-infrastructures

A download of the document was fascinating to read.

Page 14 (of 58) tells us Portugal is mentioned.

On Page 29 we read:

Amongst the forerunners in designing a legal framework adapted to the use of eHealth are Denmark, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Norway, Scotland, Slovak Republic and Sweden. Almost all countries which do not (yet) have specific regulations with regards to one or more fields of eHealth, such as Austria, Cyprus, Latvia, Malta or Portugal, do have some regulation on health data, if only through the transposition of article 8 of the EU Data Protection Directive.29

On Page 37 we read:

Other countries such as Portugal have local implementations of ePrescription software in hospitals or pharmacies, but currently no electronic transfer of prescriptions from GPs to pharmacies is implemented.

On Page 46 we find:

Patient eCards are often based on or equivalent to multipurpose eCards for eGovernment services - including healthcare. In Finland for example, when providing citizens with a personal identity code, the Population Register Centre creates also an electronic identity for them (FINEID). The electronic client identifier is used for electronic user identification in secure online transactions. It is a dataset consisting of a series of numbers and a check character that helps identify Finnish citizens. In Portugal, an eCard for patients was deployed, that integrates previously issued cards in the field of personal identity card, taxpayer‟s card, social security card, voter‟s card and health system card. Their eID is a smartcard that provides visual identity authentication, with increased security, and elec-tronic identity authentication based on biometrics (photo and finger print) and electronic signature features.

And that seems to be it according to the Adobe Acrobat search.

There is also a 2007 review that is found here:

http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ERA_Reports/Portugal_eHealth-ERA_country_report_final_01-06-2007.pdf

A classic from this report is here (Page 15)

“Means available to the general public for expressing their opinions on eHealth policies and plans

There are no particular means for the general public for expressing their opinions about eHealth policies in Portugal.”

From my review it is clear Portugal is going down a different e-Health path basic on an eCard (rather like an Access Card +) and that it is way behind Scandinavia, Holland and a range of other sites.

There is nothing unique or special I can see that is specifically relevant to Australia, other than they seem to have some administrative Health Portals.

Ms Huxtable seems to have been making it up as she went along when speaking with the Australian Portugal is in an average to poor e-Health place right now!

Senator Boyce is right. There is nothing remotely like the PCEHR being done anywhere and certainly not in Portugal!

David.

Ps. A small factoid - Kaiser Permanente serves about ½ of the number of people in OZ! Of course their e-Health sadly makes Australia look just a little behind the game having integrated hospital, ambulatory care and patient access systems that are fully implemented and very well used.

See here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiser_Permanente

D.

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

Well The Delivery Clock Is Now Really Ticking. What Odds Do We Give Them?

As alerted a couple of months ago it has now been confirmed that NEHTA has chosen IBM to help them get the National Authentication System for Health (NASH) up and going.

The official announcement is here:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/mr-yr11-nr-nr032.htm

IBM Selected for E-health Authentication Service

The National E-Health Transition Authority has selected IBM to design and build the National Authentication Service for Health, a key building block in developing personally controlled e-health records for Australia.

1 March 2011

The Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon, today announced that the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) has selected IBM to design and build the National Authentication Service for Health (NASH).

The National Authentication Service is a key building block in the development of personally controlled e-health records for Australians and is fundamental to the Gillard Government’s determination to equip our health system for the future.

Minister Roxon said that NASH will improve the security of electronic health communications, such as referrals, prescriptions and personally controlled electronic health records (PCEHR).

“It is critically important that when our doctors and nurses use e-health systems they know that they are sending and receiving communications to and from the right people,” Minister Roxon said.

“This system will put in place strong access control mechanisms for PCEHR so that patients will be able to grant access to their information – and be able to track which providers have accessed their records.”

Minister Roxon said that today’s announcement is another step towards PCEHR being available to Australians who want to sign up from 1 July next year.

”The NASH will be designed in consultation with both clinicians and consumers to ensure that it meets the needs of the Australian health care system and its patients,” Minister Roxon said.

This system will support the implementation of robust audit and monitoring processes for both local health provider systems and national e-health services.

NEHTA undertook an open tender process to enable industry participation and clear evaluation of the options for the design and build of the NASH.

As part of the contract, IBM will utilise its combined hardware, software and services capabilities to manage the project delivery of the NASH system for Australia’s healthcare providers. This includes industry and technology consulting expertise, security and access management technologies, and IT infrastructure management services.

The NASH will be built to meet the standards and requirements of the National e-Authentication Framework, the Gatekeeper PKI Framework and the National Smartcard Framework managed by the Australian Government Information Management Office.

Here is the release from NEHTA on the same topic:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/media-centre/nehta-news/823-nash

NEHTA Selects IBM to Secure the National E-Health Agenda

1 March 2011. IBM awarded $23.6M dollar contract to develop nation-wide authentication system for electronic health records.

IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced it has been awarded a $23.6M dollar contract with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) to design and build Australia’s National Authentication Service for Health (NASH) project.

The NASH will provide the first nationwide secure and authenticated service for healthcare organisations and personnel to exchange e-health information. The project will act as a cornerstone in transforming Australia’s health system including the establishment of a Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCeHR), and will help drive the smarter use of data, information and communications in healthcare delivery.

Under the agreement, IBM will utilise its combined hardware, software and services capabilities to manage the project delivery of the NASH system for Australia’s healthcare providers. This includes industry and technology consulting expertise, security and access management technologies, and IT infrastructure management services.

In order to facilitate the rapid adoption of NASH by the healthcare software community, NEHTA is providing a software development kit (SDK) that will allow existing healthcare systems and deployments to quickly and seamlessly integrate with NASH. This SDK will also ensure that transactions are properly authenticated and audited in accordance with Australian standards.

Together with clinical terminology, messaging standards and unique healthcare identifiers, the NASH will provide one of the fundamental building blocks for a national e-health system, as well as providing security credentials for use at the organisational and local level.

“Our agreement with IBM enables NEHTA to build a system that will give healthcare professionals timely and secure access to appropriate patient information,” said Peter Fleming, Chief Executive Officer, NEHTA. “In turn, the NASH program will take us one step closer to broader healthcare access for all Australians.”

Andrew Stevens, Managing Director for IBM Australia and New Zealand, said the agreement represented a vital step in promoting the broader take-up of e-health, enabling a more patient-centric healthcare system and improved health outcomes for Australians

“This programme will benefit over 600,000 Australian doctors, nurses and allied health providers and accelerate the delivery of smarter healthcare across the entire healthcare system,” said Mr Stevens.

“By partnering with IBM, NEHTA gains access to IBM’s deep healthcare industry expertise and proven record in delivering complex business transformation projects,” Mr Stevens added.

IBM’s work with NEHTA is another example of how IBM is building powerful new systems around the world that improve the delivery of healthcare. IBM is creating smarter, more connected systems that deliver better care with fewer mistakes, predict and prevent diseases, and empower people to make better choices.

This includes integrating data so that doctors and patients can share information securely, seamlessly and efficiently. IBM also helps clients apply advanced analytics to improve medical research, diagnosis, and treatment to improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs.

NEHTA was established in 2005 by the Australian federal, state and territory governments to identify and develop the foundations necessary for an e-health system.

-ENDS-

For more information on NEHTA please visit: www.nehta.gov.au

For more information on IBM please visit: www.ibm.com

Here is the short blog that ‘pre-announced’ the outcome.

Wednesday, January 05, 2011

Rumor Central - Who Will Deliver NASH for NEHTA?

I wonder if it is true but it seems IBM may have won the tender. I expect we will see an announcement that tells us if I was right or wrong over the next few days!

We await a working NASH!

David.

All I can say is things do move more slowly than one might imagine!

There is a heap of coverage:

Go here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/ibm-wins-government-e-health-security-contract/story-e6frgakx-1226013765428

and here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/378207/ibm_secure_e-health_records/

and here (if keen - it’s all the same stuff!)

http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/networking/45484-ibm-wins-24-million-e-health-gig

What is yet to come is any discussion of what is actually said in all this.

There are some real contradictions and questions I reckon especially about who is going to do what.

I find the release NEHTA release confusing.

Is this saying that IBM will deliver NASH or will project manage delivery and that there will be a whole lot more costs to come.

Compare:

Sydney, Australia – 1 March 2011: IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced it has been awarded a $23.6M dollar contract with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) to design and build Australia’s National Authentication Service for Health (NASH) project.

With (a few paragraphs down):

Under the agreement, IBM will utilise its combined hardware, software and services capabilities to manage the project delivery of the NASH system for Australia’s healthcare providers. This includes industry and technology consulting expertise, security and access management technologies, and IT infrastructure management services.

Which is it either or both?

We then read

“In order to facilitate the rapid adoption of NASH by the healthcare software community, NEHTA is providing a software development kit (SDK) that will allow existing healthcare systems and deployments to quickly and seamlessly integrate with NASH. This SDK will also ensure that transactions are properly authenticated and audited in accordance with Australian standards.”

How can they do that until the NASH is designed and built? It seems to me there are 3 major jobs here:

1. Design and build (and presumably test, trial implement and pilot)

2. A procurement task for the requisite smartcards and card readers.

3. A major implementation and change management task for the proposed 600,000 users.

In the background there are all sorts of organisational issues establishing the entity to issue, revoke and replace credentials and so on once you get rolling.

I wonder who is doing what and how much is going where. Of course, yet again there is no public business case.

It is utterly clear that implementation will be a multiyear effort to cover the providers (600,000) and what about the public? I am not at all sure they are actually involved in any real way other than the Health Minister wittering on saying:

“It is critically important that when our doctors and nurses use e-health systems they know that they are sending and receiving communications to and from the right people,” Minister Roxon said.

“This system will put in place strong access control mechanisms for PCEHR so that patients will be able to grant access to their information – and be able to track which providers have accessed their records.”

If we are going two factor authentication for the public I reckon IBM has underbid to blazes!

The real test will be what happens from here.

We will need to see a detailed implementation plan to work out just what they are doing, what the timelines are and how the costs stack up. Ms Roxon’s timelines look pretty rubbery to me.

Of course I guess all that will also be secret so the first we will know about how it is going will be when the larger clinical community gets to see what they are being stuck with.

I wonder will IBM make NEHTA behave. All I can do is wish them luck!

Who was it who said the only thing better than winning a Government contract as losing it!

David.

Medicare Locals: I Really Wish Someone One Would Explain What They Are and How They Will Work.

The following appeared last week.

Are you interested in becoming a Medicare Local?

22 Feb 2011

Approximately 15 Medicare Locals will commence in July 2011. A further 15 will commence in January 2012, with the remainder starting in July 2012.

The first group of Medicare Locals will be drawn from high performing Divisions of General Practice, preferably working in consortia with other high performing organisations with the advanced capacity needed to lead primary health care reforms in their catchment, and who have the capacity to take on the roles and functions expected under the new arrangements.

The subsequent groups of Medicare Locals will build on the expertise and capacity of existing primary care organisations, particularly Divisions of General Practice as well as other primary health care organisations and service providers.

Applications for Medicare Locals to commence in July 2011 close on 5 April 2011.

Applications for Medicare Locals to commence in 2012 close on 19 July 2011.

Medicare Local Guidelines and Information for Applicants

These guidelines have been provided for general information; anyone wishing to apply should visit the Department’s tenders and grants webpage where you will be required to enter your contact information. This is necessary to ensure you are notified in the event of any additional information becoming available during the Invitation to Apply process.

I have browsed the document mentioned above and am still not all that clear what is going on.

There are a whole lot of ‘buzzwords’ but very little clarity.

Here is the big picture:

“The Commonwealth Government is establishing Medicare Locals to drive improvements in primary health care and ensure that primary health care services are better tailored to meet the needs to local communities. Medicare Locals will be primary health care organisations, established to coordinate primary health care delivery to address local health care needs and service gaps.” Page 3

This seems to be the problem to be addressed:

Existing arrangements involving Divisions of General Practice, as well as Commonwealth, state and territory health programs and initiatives have had some impact on reducing the fragmentation of the primary health care service delivery system. However, their effect has been limited by a lack of overarching coordination between services offered by providers and the needs of patients and consumers. This shortcoming has often led to complexity within the service system resulting in delays and inefficiency, for example, patient attendance at a hospital Emergency Department for conditions that could be more appropriately treated in a primary health care setting.

Accordingly, the Commonwealth has announced the implementation of Medicare Locals, primary health care organisations, to improve coordination and integration of primary health

care in local communities, address service gaps, and make it easier for patients to navigate their local health care system. Medicare Locals will reflect their local communities and health care services in their governance, including consumers, doctors, nurses, allied health and State-funded community health providers.

Medicare Locals will be expected to engage with a wide range of health professionals; identify community primary health care needs; and work to fill the gaps in primary health care in their area. To meet these complex challenges many existing primary health care organisations that plan to apply to operate as Medicare Locals will need to increase their capacity or expertise on a number of fronts to progress the health sector reforms. To adapt to the new reforms many organisations may need to increase their size, scope of program delivery, performance, achievement of outcomes, change management capacity, influence and engagement with the broader community and the primary health care sector. Medicare Locals will also be expected to report against an accountability and performance framework. They will be supported in all the above areas at a national level.

The obvious question to ask is how?

Page 5 attempts to tell us:

The role of Medicare Locals

As critical elements in the Government’s health reforms, Medicare Locals are expected to be closely involved with other reform initiatives to help drive and strengthen the primary health care system, including:

- establishing effective collaborations between Medicare Locals, Local Hospital Networks and local Lead Clinician Groups once established to deliver more coordinated, integrated, locally responsive and flexible health services so that patients transition smoothly in and out of hospital and receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time;

- supporting the development of e-health and health information, including shared electronic health records, data provision to drive health system performance, service planning, monitoring and evaluation;

-improving the planning of primary health care services to respond to local needs;

-supporting the ongoing development of primary health care infrastructure, including GP Super Clinics;

- initiatives to increase and enhance the primary health care workforce to meet local

community needs; and

- initiatives in general practice and primary health care designed to improve disease prevention and management and improve access to services. These include the Australian Government’s reform measures to improve access to after-hours primary care, telehealth and access to primary health care services for older Australians.

There is about half a billion dollars over 4 years to set these up and $171M per annum for ongoing operations. (If there are about 60 of these Medicare Locals finally that is only 3 million per annum with each covering say 400,000 people. Back of the envelope that is $7.50 per person per year. ).

Do some other calculations yourself like this means 20 or so people to address these issues for 400,000 souls! Remember these replace GP Divisions which are being defunded, as far as I can tell, so how much new money who knows?

Here we see it:

“All existing program funding to Divisions of General Practice will be directed through the Medicare Local and over time this will be absorbed into a single funding agreement.”

But towards to end of the document we do see some e-Health information.

Under The Section on Important Notices to Applicants we find the following (Page 21):

vii. Information Management and Information Technology (IM/IT)

The introduction of a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) is an important element of the Government’s broader reforms to improve the Australian health system. The Commonwealth and state and territory governments are working to put in place national standards and infrastructure to support the secure management and communication of health information. As such, the Commonwealth requires each Medicare Local to make an appropriate investment to ensure IM/IT arrangements are secure and properly address community expectations on privacy and security, and to provide advice and assistance to primary health care providers to meet required standards. Applicants can obtain more information at the website addresses provided below.

Applicants should note the purposes for which Medicare Local funding can be applied (see Section 1.3 above). Medicare Locals that are responsible for the delivery of healthcare services will address the requirements below. Medicare Locals responsible for the provision of support to organisations that deliver healthcare services will assist them with the implementation of the requirements below.

- Implementation of systems that adhere to National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) specifications and frameworks and Standards Australia's Health Informatics Standards, within 24 months of publication.

- Compliance with all relevant state, territory and Commonwealth government requirements for collecting and reporting information, e.g. for data fields and connectivity.

- The Commonwealth intends to introduce a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) to be available to Australians who wish to have one. Within 24 months of a Commonwealth approved PCEHR System becoming operational or being enhanced; ensure that primary health care providers use the PCEHR System for consumers who have given consent to do so.

- Noting that Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) represent best practice for the evaluation of arrangements for management of patient health information, ensure that a PIA is conducted in accordance with the Australian Privacy Commissioner’s Privacy Impact assessment Guide Office of Privacy Commissioner, http://www.privacy.gov.au/ Privacy Impact Assessment Guide Revised May 2010.

- When implementing IM/IT systems, undertake a Security Threat Risk Assessment that is in line with recognised Australian standards. (ISO 31000 Risk management - Principles and guidelines, ISO/IEC 27001 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements). Ensure that this assessment considers the provisions in Health and Privacy legislation that require the protection of health and other personal information such as the protection of Medicare numbers.

- The Information Management Maturity Framework (IMMF) has been designed specifically to build capacity in information management and enhance service delivery outcomes. Consideration of the framework and its associated toolkit elements should be incorporated into standard IM/IT. The IMMF can be found at: http://www.agpn.com.au/programs/ehealth-and-information-management/agpn-ehealth-program/information-management-maturity-framework

----- End Extract.

Now I have seen some open-ended ambit claims in my time but this is a lulu. Who knows just what NEHTA / DoHA might come up with and just why would anyone sign up without some assurances of practicality and common-sense - things NEHTA at least hardly has a reputation for!

I leave it as an exercise for the reader to work out just where the IMMF fits!

One really does wonder just what difference the $171M on Medicare Locals will make in an overall health spend of close to $100 Billion per annum. Given this document I am still not at all clear just what the money will actually be spent doing - other than some apparent enforcement activities focussed on wayward GPs. It feels a bit like just an extra layer of bureaucracy to me and note that are not integrated into the planned Local Hospital Networks. We shall see I guess!

David.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 28 February, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment:

The theme this week seems to be the lack of transparency in initiatives in E-Health in Australia. Both NEHTA and DoHA seem quite unable to use the ordinary processes of democracy to facilitate proper discussion and review of what is being planned - before it is just dropped on an unsuspecting public.

Any suggestions as to why this is welcome!

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/nehta-exempt-from-foi-laws/story-fn4htb9o-1226010207774

NEHTA exempt from FOI laws

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • February 22, 2011 4:32PM

THE National E-Health Transition Authority is impervious to freedom of information requests, according to Australia's new Information Commissioner, John McMillan -- at least for now.

Despite an earlier understanding that the heavily taxpayer-funded body was subject to Freedom of Information laws, Professor McMillan told a Senate estimates hearing that "the Act spells out the agencies which are subject to it, and NEHTA does not fall into that category".

Liberal Senator Sue Boyce asked why NEHTA had been listed as an agency subject to the Act in the latest annual report by FOI Minister Brendan O’Connor.

Professor McMillan said the statement in the annual report was "erroneous".

-----

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110211005719/en/Tunstall-Chosen-Provide-Telehealth-Solutions-Chronic-Disease

February 11, 2011 11:08 AM Eastern Time

Tunstall Chosen to Provide Telehealth Solutions for Chronic Disease Management Program in New South Wales, Australia

State-wide program will support over 40,000 people with long-term conditions using remote health management

DONCASTER, England--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Tunstall Healthcare, the leader in telehealthcare solutions, has been selected by the state Government of New South Wales in Australia as one of a panel of suppliers for its Connecting Care program, a new, large-scale initiative for chronic disease management.

The program, coordinated by New South Wales Health (NSW Health), will use telehealth systems to support state residents living with long-term health conditions including diabetes, CHF, coronary artery disease, COPD and hypertension.

-----

http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/12180

Comparing an SLK-based and a name-based data linkage strategy: an investigation into the PIAC linkage

Data linkage series no. 11

In 2005, the Institute was funded to create a linked aged care database to enable analysis of pathways through aged care services. The linkage strategy for the project involved using a Statistical Linkage Key (SLK) because of the lack of either a name or a common person identifier on the data sets being linked. This paper validates the results obtained using the SLK linkage strategy by comparing it directly with a name-based linkage strategy.

Authored by AIHW.

Published 23 February 2011; ISSN 1833-1238; ISBN-13 978-1-74249-124-0; AIHW cat. no. CSI 11; 54pp.; INTERNET ONLY

------

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/377960/nehta_anticipates_e-health_record_clarity/

NEHTA anticipates e-health record clarity

Looming release of draft concept of operations will begin wider discussion over e-health record

The Federal Government’s lead e-health agency is anxiously anticipating clarity around the $467 million personally-controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) program, with hopes the imminent public release of a draft concept of operations will catalyse greater cooperation from the wider industry.

Despite promises from health minister Nicola Roxon to publicly release the document, which has so far only been handed to potential bidders on key tenders, a spokesperson failed to respond to questions of exact dates at time of writing.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/nsws-ambulance-service-diagnoses-system-virus/story-e6frgakx-1226009679349

NSW's ambulance service diagnoses system virus

NSW's ambulance service has identified the computer virus that forced the shutdown of its system responsible for dispatching and tracking ambulances over a weekend but will not reveal which virus did the damage.

Technicians at the ambulance service discovered the virus while performing scanning tests in database boxes accessed by VisiCAD -- a globally adopted computer dispatch system used by the NSW service for 10 years.

Staff resorted to manual processes on the weekend of February 12-13 until the following Monday at all four ambulance control centres in Sydney, Charlestown, Dubbo and Warilla, after the virus struck.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/industry-anger-over-therapeutic-goods-administration-bid-to-change-processes/story-e6frgakx-1226009706255

Industry anger over Therapeutic Goods Administration bid to change processes

THE Therapeutic Goods Administration's proposed overhaul of the medical devices approvals and reporting process has been slammed by industry as costly and unlikely to benefit patient safety.

There has been an angry reaction to the TGA's statement that the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods needed to change because some product sponsors were manipulating the listing process.

"If a sponsor has deliberately used this process to put a (non-approved) device on the market, the TGA has a wide range of powers to deal with offenders without passing on extra regulations and costs," said Geoff Purtill, managing director of home care and mobility provider Invacare Australia in a review submission.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/game-plan-for-outsourcing-is-changing/story-fn7uxxqa-1226005551249

Game plan for outsourcing is changing

GAVIN Larkings will require steady hands as he "retools the factory" -- CSC Australia's catchcry in the new year.

The IT outsourcing giant needs to change the way it operates internally to get a jump on the competition and retain customers such as AMP, Westpac, GE, Woodside, OneSteel, NEHTA, Defence, ATO and Immigration. The old outsourcing model may still resonate with some customers but that pool is fast drying up.

Mr Larkings, CSC Australia president and chief executive, realises the clock is ticking.

"The big change that we see is (IT) outsourcing but not as we know it. What's really driving that change is the consumerisation of IT," Mr Larkings says.

"Traditional outsourcing will still have to be retained for particular clients but emerging technologies and services such as cloud computing are going to move traditional services of IT consulting, systems integration and outsourcing into a different dimension.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/377474/global_health_1h_loss_widens_511k/?eid=-255&uid=25465

Global Health 1H loss widens to $511k

Global Health, (ASX:GLH), a e-health solution provider, said its loss widened to $511k in the first half as a result of the strong Australian dollar

Australian e-health solution provider Global Health (ASX:GLH) has reported a net loss of $511,500 for FY11, as a result of foreign exchange losses.

Revenue grew 1.5 per cent to $2.6 million, with core healthcare license and services revenue increasing 15 per cent to $2.46 million. Ebitda losses meanwhile decreased to $229,000 from $288,000 in 1H09.

------

http://www.zdnet.com.au/isoft-fights-to-get-back-in-the-black-339310313.htm

iSoft fights to get back in the black

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au on February 25th, 2011

E-health company iSoft has logged a net loss after tax for the half year to 31 December 2010 of $84.1 million, staunching the outflow of cash while it attempts to turn itself around.

For the year to 30 June 2010, the company had reported a staggering $383 million loss, announcing plans to carry out a major restructure, cutting staff and implementing other operational savings.

However, the company has put a positive spin on the results for this half year, pointing to the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (not including restructuring costs or exceptional items) of $9.8 million. This compares to -$8.4 million in the half year to 30 June 2010 and $27.5 million in the half year to 30 December 2009. Restructuring and refinancing costs contributed to a high operating cash outflow for the first half year.

-----

http://www.cfoworld.com.au/news/533921/isoft-swings-to-84m-loss/

iSOFT swings to $84m loss

0 Links | 0 Comments | Submit link | Report | 19:40, 25th February 2011

By Dylan Bushell-Embling (CFO World)

Health IT company iSOFT (ASX:ISF) swung to an $84.1 million net loss in 1H11, due to restructuring costs and impairment charges.

ISF shares fell 10.29% to $0.061 in Friday's trading following the announcement.

The company, which had made a $4.8 million profit in 1H10, spent the most recent half attempting to restore the financial health of the business.

These efforts generated redundancy, property exit and restructuring and refinancing costs of $15.8 million for the quarter.

Revenue also declined 27% to $161.6 million, due mainly to an anticipated $20 million decline in revenue from the UK's National Programme for IT.

------

http://www.hospitaliteurope.com/article/24488/iSOFT_takes_to_the_sky_with_IBM

iSOFT takes to the sky with IBM

Tuesday 22nd February 2011

iSOFT Group Limited is to release a cloud edition of its Viaduct integration tool to meet the growing demand for simple, low-cost integration by non-specialists, as a first step to offering other market-leading healthcare solutions under its new cloud strategy.

The world's largest healthcare IT provider outside of the US, iSOFT has signed an agreement to run its Viaduct integration tool on the IBM Smart Business Development & Test on the IBM Cloud.

The move gives non-specialists access to a powerful, yet easy-to-use integration tool on a "try-before-you-buy" basis. The application can be downloaded at no cost for developers to design, build and test interfaces and assess its value fully.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/fibre-optics-to-monitor-health-of-ivf-embryos-scientists-collaborate-on-world-first-research/story-e6frg6nf-1226009692584

Fibre optics to monitor health of IVF embryos. Scientists collaborate on world first research

TWO of the nation's great scientific minds are collaborating on world-first research that could revolutionise reproductive technology using fibre optics.

South Australian of the Year, physicist Tanya Monro, and gynaecologist Robert Norman, the state's 2009 scientist of the year, have established a reproductive health laboratory at Adelaide University.

Professor Norman said teaming physics and biology could provide a unique insight into in vitro fertilisation by using fibre optics to look at the development of an embryo on a nano scale.

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/technology/enterprise/last-rites-for-health-it-system-20110220-1b14j.html

Last rites for health IT system

Kate Hagan

February 21, 2011

HEALTH Department staff fear Victoria's $360 million health technology program is being shut down after being told that no contracts will be renewed for people working on it.

The news delivered to staff late last week follows an admission last month by Health Minister David Davis that he was considering abandoning the HealthSMART program, which is five years late and $35 million over budget.

He described HealthSMART - which is supposed to link computer systems in hospitals and give medical staff immediate access to patient records - as ''the myki of the health system''.

-----

http://whitehorse-leader.whereilive.com.au/news/story/box-hill-hospital-s-state-first-in-patient-care/

Note Date: And The Optimism Then.

Box Hill Hospital's state first in patient care

A GROUND-breaking new system will give Box Hill Hospital medical staff electronic bedside access to patients’ medical information.

Patient Egidio Mattiuzzo, Eastern Health chief executive Tracy Batten (left) and Veronica Whitter with the new system. N23WH311

Eastern Health is the first in Victoria to implement the HealthSMART Clinicals System, which it says will have a huge impact on the way doctors and nurses perform daily roles.

Program director Veronica Whitter said the system would help clinical decisions, making the process a lot quicker.

She said medical practitioners would have access to all the patients’ details, including pathology results, discharge information, allergies, alerts and appointments. “The key is all information at the right place and the right time,” she said.

-----

http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/194_04_210211/suppl_contents_210211.html

MJA Supplement Contents

21 February 2011

Research enabling the e-health revolution

HTML The Australian e-Health Research Centre: enabling the health care information and communication technology revolution

David P Hansen, Phil Gurney, Gary Morgan and Bruce Barraclough — Med J Aust 2011; 194 (4): S5-S7.

HTML Developing a national emergency department data reference set based on SNOMED CT

David P Hansen, Madonna L Kemp, Sandra R Mills, Megan A Mercer, Paul A Frosdick and Michael J Lawley — Med J Aust 2011; 194 (4): S8-S10.

HTML The health lessons of a lifetime: what “wellbeing” means to me

Greg McCallum — Med J Aust 2011; 194 (4): S11.

And about 10 more articles

-----

http://www.cio.com.au/article/377541/federal_govt_collaborates_web_traffic_spikes/?eid=-601&uid=25465

Federal govt collaborates on web traffic spikes

Updated: Talks surround potential internal government Cloud

The Department of Human Services has voiced support for an internal Cloud based on existing infrastructure shared and virtualised between Federal Government agencies, as a means of dealing with spikes in traffic on major government websites.

According to the department’s deputy secretary of IT infrastructure, John Wadeson, talks with other agency CIOs were ongoing about such an arrangement.

“We’re working away at the back-end... some people are calling it a government Cloud of sorts,” he said. “We are trying to get ahead of the game in massive provisioning of infrastructure.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/predictions-2011/the-nbn-must-start-delivering-results-to-taxpayers/story-fn7uxvck-1226005563346

The NBN must start delivering results to taxpayers

  • ANALYST
    Kevin Noonan, Ovum

KEVIN Noonan has a simple message for the federal government: if it wants the $36 billion National Broadband Network to succeed -- don't stuff up, and start delivering outcomes for citizens.

Similar advice is aimed at bureaucrats in charge of the $467 million personally controlled e-health records system.

The NBN has many backers, including Google chief internet evangelist Vint Cerf. Its critics, chiefly the opposition, have demanded a cost-benefit analysis on the project's viability.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/in-depth/deal-struck-for-foi-laws-to-cover-national-broadband-network/story-e6frgaif-1226011207539

Deal struck for FOI laws to cover National Broadband Network

  • From: AAP
  • February 24, 2011 10:15AM

THE Gillard government and the Australian Greens have struck a deal to make the national broadband network subject to freedom of information laws.

Labor previously had been opposed to such a move, arguing it would compromise the commercial confidence of the NBN Co, the company building the $36 billion network.

But Greens communications spokesman Scott Ludlam said the deal, struck over a fortnight of negotiations, would respect commercial sensitivity.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/libreoffice-the-last-word-in-open-source/story-e6frgakx-1226009579021

LibreOffice the last word in open source software

  • DOUBLECLICK: David Frith
  • From: The Australian
  • February 22, 2011 12:00AM

WHY do so many people and businesses keep buying Microsoft Office at about $200 for home users and $379 for businesses when there are good substitutes that cost zilch, or a only small fee?

It's a question DoubleClick, despite being a pretty dedicated Office user, has often pondered. The main reasons, we guess, are historical and environmental: most of us have used the suite for years, so we keep updating -- and so does pretty well everyone else around us with whom we may need to share files.

Then there's the bells-and-whistles thing. Footnotes, endnotes, indexing, collaboration tools, formulae, image editing, ribbons, macros -- Office has more bells, more whistles, more tricks and turns, than most of us are ever likely to learn or use.

-----

http://www.techworld.com.au/article/377607/windows_7_service_pack_1_ready_download/

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is ready for download

Microsoft has released its first Service Pack for the Windows 7 operating system addressing minor OS nips and tucks.

Bug fixes and security patches don't make for the most exciting Windows update, but they're the high points of Windows 7 Service Pack 1, now widely available for download.

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is now available from Microsoft's Website for download, or via Windows Update, and by ordering an installation DVD. Windows 7 SP1 takes roughly 30 minutes to install, and you'll have to restart the computer halfway through. System requirements and detailed installation instructions can also be found on Microsoft's Website.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 59 – Results – 28 February, 2011.

The question was:

Will The Health Identifier Service Actually Deliver Anything Useful in the Next Two Years?

The answers were as follows:

Absolutely!

- 5 (11%)

Might Be Pretty Delayed

- 9 (20%)

Neutral

- 2 (4%)

Probably Not

- 16 (36%)

It Will Never Actually Deliver As Planned

- 12 (27%)

Well that is seems pretty clear with only 33% suggesting that delivery was likely and would probably be slow!

Votes : 44

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Time Has Come For Some Light To Be Shone into The Dark. Twelve Weeks Waiting Is Long Enough!

This really has become just too silly.

This appeared in early January.

Transparency call on privacy: patient records
8th January 2011
By: Karen Dearne - The Australian

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon has agreed to release confidential plans for widespread debate.

The Labor government's "personally controlled" approach to a nationwide system of sharing patients' medical records has caused much confusion since it was announced a year ago.

But Roxon says a draft concept of operations will soon be issued for public consultation.

Roxon is referring to a draft framework developed to give registered bidders for a $55 million funding pot for new e-health initiatives some idea of how the thing will work. It was produced by the National E-Health Transition Authority after "behind closed doors" consultations with selected consumer, medical and industry representatives. Other community groups are frustrated by the lack of openness.

Australian Privacy Foundation chairman Roger Clarke has written to NEHTA and the Health Department complaining about the exclusion of "civil society" from deep-level design consultations conducted secretly under non-disclosure arrangements.

The peak privacy body warns of serious deficiencies in PCEHR proposals to date.

"While we are told there is to be rigorous governance and oversight to maintain privacy, the specifics are yet to be decided," Clarke wrote after a consumer round-table in November.

"The slide-sets shown referred to a predecessor proposal and no documentation has been supplied.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/transparency-call-on-privacy-patient-records/story-e6frg8y6-1225983231825

Some 7-8 weeks later has the Minister done as she said she would?

Well not exactly.

Public kept in the dark on e-health record system

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • February 25, 2011 12:00AM

THE draft concept of operations for the $467 million personally controlled e-health record contains a "wealth of information" but is not yet ready to be shared with the general public, the federal Health department has told a Senate estimates hearing.

Queensland Liberal Senator Sue Boyce asked why the material had not been released for public discussion when it was being circulated for commercial purposes.

Health deputy secretary Rosemary Huxtable said the draft concept of operations for the PCEHR had not been finalised.

However, she confirmed it had been released to potential bidders for a range of PCEHR contractors.

"It is certainly at a very advanced stage, and it has been provided as part of the documentation at industry briefings," she said. "But there is still work occurring in consultations through the National E-Health Transition Authority's processes.

"The fact (the draft) is not quite finalised is not really an impediment to bidders using it to better understand the government's expectations."

Ms Huxtable said tenders for a national infrastructure partner and other PCEHR programs had been put to the market, but no contracts had been let.

.....

E-Health strategy head Liz Forman said a Victorian Health department report that concluded the new $90m Healthcare Identifiers service patient numbers should not be relied on as a sole source of accurate information had been "welcomed".

"Certainly the team's level of enthusiasm is reflected in them doing such a thorough job," Ms Forman said. "The risk assessment report refers to using the individual healthcare identifier on its own -- it's never been the intention for the number to be used on its own as a form of identification.

"That report is quite a rigorous analysis of a whole lot of possible scenarios for using identifiers, where the risks are and how the system design will minimise that risk.

"Which is actually a very positive thing to do, and we welcomed the release of that material so it can be shared by other organisations looking at adopting identifiers."

Ms Forman said she was not aware of NEHTA doing any similar risk assessment

......

Full article here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/government/public-kept-in-the-dark-on-e-health-record-system/story-fn4htb9o-1226011639278

There is also comment in Computerworld.

NEHTA anticipates e-health record clarity

Looming release of draft concept of operations will begin wider discussion over e-health record

The Federal Government’s lead e-health agency is anxiously anticipating clarity around the $467 million personally-controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) program, with hopes the imminent public release of a draft concept of operations will catalyse greater cooperation from the wider industry.

Despite promises from health minister Nicola Roxon to publicly release the document, which has so far only been handed to potential bidders on key tenders, a spokesperson failed to respond to questions of exact dates at time of writing.

The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), unlike National Broadband Network wholesaler NBN Co, is currently exempt from Freedom of Information legislation, preventing parties from accessing the documentation without participating in the tender process.

The draft paper is yet to be finalised, according to members of the Department of Health and Ageing who appeared before a Senate estimates hearing earlier in the week, but will ultimately provide greater information on how the electronic health record will work and which elements will be included.

However, exactly which elements will be initially included in the record is still up for debate, according to NEHTA’s head of clinical leadership and engagement, Mukesh Haikerwal.

Haikerwal said the release of the document publicly would likely signal the beginning of a clarification process over initial elements to be included in the PCEHR, a matter that remains debatable among both health providers and the wider health industry.

“Everyone has a view of what should be in it; that view grows depending on who you talk to and so when you coalesce that you’ve got a massive elephant,” he told Computerworld Australia following his return from the United States.

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/377960/nehta_anticipates_e-health_record_clarity/

There is no reason for DoHA and NEHTA to be just sitting on their hands and treating the public like mushrooms. If the entire vendor community and the Standards Australia community can have a copy of this document the why not others who are interested?

Here is the e-mail Standards Australia sent out:

-----

From: Deleted

Sent: Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:18 AM

To:

26 Recipients

Cc:

4 Others

Subject: PCEHR _Concept of Operations (Con-Ops)

Dear Members of IT-014,

Please find attached useful information on PCEHR and relevant teams to support it in NEHTA. This information is being distributed to you so that you have time to read and understand the contents and how it may affect the work program for 2011/2012 with regard to a national focus in this area. Please bring your valued recommendations to the parent committee meeting on 8th/9th March in Brisbane.

The contents of this email and attachment(s) are confidential to IT-014 Technical Committee Members only at this stage. Therefore do not forward this email, it is for your information only.

Please be advised that any breaches regarding confidentiality and non-distribution of this document will be acted on accordingly by Standards Australia.

Kind Regards

Deleted.

----- End E-Mail

What the e-mail says it that anyone who gets it will be doing the wrong thing if they indulge in “non-distribution”! Presumably that was meant was ‘on-distribution’ (grin). Don’t you just love the warning red and hollow threats etc!

Anyway I am happy to comply and distribute (I was not on the distribution list) as my feeling is that this nonsense has gone far enough.

Go here to download the apparently current draft as this is what SA is passing around.

http://moreassoc.com.au/downloads/PCEHR%20Concept%20of%20Operations%20V0.9.30.pdf

(About 4.3 Megs) (Right-Click is the easiest way to download in Windows)

The SA file name is different (AS-NZS 31000-2009.pdf) but the version is identical as far as I can tell

Enjoy and comments welcome!

Before closing I have to highlight this:

“E-Health strategy head Liz Forman said a Victorian Health department report that concluded the new $90m Healthcare Identifiers service patient numbers should not be relied on as a sole source of accurate information had been "welcomed".

"Certainly the team's level of enthusiasm is reflected in them doing such a thorough job," Ms Forman said. "The risk assessment report refers to using the individual healthcare identifier on its own -- it's never been the intention for the number to be used on its own as a form of identification.”

Just amazing spin and in front of our Parliament! As a mate said ‘She deserves an Oscar!’

David.