Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, April 08, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 8 April, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/03/25/the-road-ahead-for-the-new-health-it-coordinator/

The Road Ahead For The New Health IT Coordinator

March 25th, 2011

by Carol Diamond

The new National Coordinator for Health Information Technology will take over a vastly different office from the one that David Blumenthal, MD, assumed in March 2009.

Blumenthal faced a challenge comparable to a start-up CEO suddenly infused with large amounts of venture capital for an idea with great potential and long in the making. Of course, in this case the injection of billions of dollars came from the appropriation of taxpayer money under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) of 2009, and with it also came very aggressive implementation deadlines, public scrutiny and congressional oversight.

At a dot-com pace and with vigorous public input, Blumenthal had to build the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) staff, stand up infrastructure such as regional extension centers, develop a certification process for “qualified” health IT, create demonstration programs such as the Beacon Communities, and, most importantly, establish ambitious but achievable targets for “meaningful use”—the rules by which new federal financial incentives under HITECH will be paid to doctors and hospitals for using health information technology (IT).

-----

Direct Project Rapidly Advancing Health IT Interoperability

More than 60 healthcare and health IT organizations are supporting the federal government's push for authenticated, encrypted health information to be shared with trusted recipients over the Internet.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

March 30, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400609

If the Direct Project's objectives continue to be advanced at a fast clip, widespread adoption of universal addressing and access to secure direct messaging of health information could soon be provided to healthcare stakeholders that serve up to 160 million Americans.

Those are the latest figures from officials at the Direct Project, a program that began one year ago to specify a secure, scalable, standards-based way for healthcare participants to send authenticated, encrypted health information directly to known, trusted recipients over the Internet.

-----

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-forges-ahead-in-healthcare-while-google-said-to-pull-back/9038

Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back

By Mary Jo Foley | March 29, 2011, 7:07am PD

Microsoft is moving full-steam ahead with its healthcare push, while Google may be pulling back — and possibly pulling out all together — from the electronic medical records space.

Up until early March, Microsoft had been treating its Health Solutions Group as an “incubation,” even though that group was staffing up and fielding a variety of cloud and on-premises health services and software. But on March 7, Microsoft moved the Health Solutions Group into the Microsoft Business Solutions organization headed by Corporate Vice President Kirill Tatarinov. (The analysts at Directions on Microsoft pointed out this organizational change, which a Microsoft spokesperson confirmed for me this week.)

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/medicare-accountable-care-organization-shared-savings-cms-rule-42221-1.html

CMS Sets the I.T. Bar Very High for Medicare ACOs

HDM Breaking News, March 31, 2011

The information technology capabilities that accountable care organizations will need under the proposed rule establishing a Medicare Shared Savings Program could go far beyond what's necessary to prove Stage 1 electronic health records meaningful use. And the Shared Savings Program starts Jan. 1, 2012, during Stage 1 of meaningful use.

Compliance with coordination of care requirements "may" involve a range of strategies which "may" include:

* Use of predictive modeling to anticipate likely care needs,

* Remote monitoring of patients,

* Telehealth,

* Comparative benchmarking, and

* "The establishment and use of health information technology, including electronic health records and an electronic health information exchange to enable the provision of a beneficiary's summary of care record during transitions of care both within and outside of the ACO," according to the proposed rule, issued today and available here.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/news/report-health-it-foundation-medical-home-accountable-care

Report: Health IT is the foundation for medical home, accountable care

March 30, 2011 | Mary Mosquera

Widespread adoption of health information technology and changes in how primary care providers are paid for their services are critical to drive transformation of the U.S. healthcare system, according to a recent report.

Neither is sufficient by itself, but both are necessary to fuel major delivery system reform, according to the March 30 report Better to Best: Value-Driving Elements of the PCMH and ACO, about the benefits of patient-centered medical homes and accountable care organizations and what's needed to realize them.

For example, electronic tools, such as electronic health records and standards for health information exchange, can enable secure email, referral management, shared decision report and performance reporting.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/epocrates-ehr-physicians-mobile-web-42213-1.html

Epocrates' EHR Work Progresses

HDM Breaking News, March 30, 2011

Drug and disease reference content software vendor Epocrates Inc. has started beta testing of a mobile- and Web-based electronic health records system it is developing to target solo and small physician practices.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110331/MODERNPHYSICIAN/303319996/

Groups look to use EHR data to help docs identify 'quality gaps'

By Andis Robeznieks

Posted: March 31, 2011 - 2:00 pm ET

Data from electronic health records will be used in a new quality-improvement program launched by three major health and disease research organizations to help physicians use evidence-based guidelines in patient care.

The Guidelines Advantage is an outpatient-based collaboration of the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association and the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. It will use information from EHRs to measure provider performance against standards and benchmarks developed by the three groups.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110401/NEWS/304019987

SCRIPT Standard changes announced

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 1, 2011 - 11:45 am ET

There are two new wrinkles to electronic prescribing standards from the pre-eminent standards development organization for that genre, the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based National Council for Prescription Drug Programs.

The NCPDP has announced changes to its SCRIPT Standard commonly used by providers through their electronic health-records systems or stand-alone e-prescribing tools to communicate electronically with the corner drug store.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110401/NEWS/304019988

HHS to address 'digital divide'

By Joseph Conn

Posted: April 1, 2011 - 12:01 am ET

Health information technology will be a critical aspect of a new HHS plan to eliminate health disparities, according to a blog post at Health IT Buzz, the blog of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

On April 5, HHS will convene a health IT disparities work group that will measure IT adoption and implementation outcomes in medically underserved communities, discuss projects designed to shrink any digital divide encountered and establish "sustainable channels of communication between agencies" to achieve the previous two objectives, according to the blog post.

-----

Montana Reinstates Electronic Health Record Incentives

Intense lobbying from the governor and healthcare providers led the state legislature to overturn previous rejections of federal EHR funding.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

March 31, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400669

The Montana Senate has voted to restore $35 million in federal incentives for electronic health records (EHRs) for hospitals and community health centers across Montana. The Senate voted 45-5 for the motion on Monday.

The Montana legislature had four times denied, on party-line votes, the state's Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) the authority to accept and distribute federal incentive payments to hospitals. Montana was the only state to turn down federal EHR incentive funds.

-----

http://ehr.healthcareitnews.com/blog/new-onc-leadership-faces-uncertain-path-ahead

New ONC leadership faces uncertain path ahead

3/29/11

By Jeff Rowe, Editor

In recent weeks, the impending departure of ONC’s Dr. David Blumenthal has led to considerable speculation regarding who might step in to take the reins at ONC, as well as what that person’s priorities should be moving forward.

To this observer, whoever takes over at ONC needs to know that, as he succinctly puts it, the work is only beginning.

After reviewing several of the steps ONC has rapidly taken in just the past couple of years, he turns to the issue of Meaningful Use, the provisions to which, in his view, will provide ONC with its greatest challenge moving forward.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/institute-of-medicine-sexual-orientation-LGBT-meaningful-use-42218-1.html

IOM Calls for MU Focus on Sexual Orientation

HDM Breaking News, March 31, 2011

A new report from the Institute of Medicine recommends the collection of data on sexual orientation and gender identity be part of the objectives for achieving meaningful use of electronic health records.

The report assesses unique health disparities that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals experience and calls on the National Institutes of Health to implement a research agenda to advance knowledge about LGBT health. "Although a modest body of knowledge on LGBT health has been developed, these populations, stigmatized as sexual and gender minorities, have been the subject of relatively little health research," according to the report.

Two of seven recommendations to advance understanding of LGBT health involve the collection and management of data. The IOM also recommends that data on sexual orientation and gender identity be collected in federal funded surveys from the Department of HHS and other relevant federal surveys.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/poor-it-compatibility-between-va-dod-hinders-care-wounded-soldiers/2011-03-31

Poor IT compatibility between VA, DOD hinders care for wounded soldiers

March 31, 2011 — 10:48am ET | By Janice Simmons

The departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs (VA) are falling short on efforts to provide care to injured combat personnel because their IT systems lack compatibility, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

In 2007, following reports of poor case management for outpatients at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, the Departments of Defense and VA jointly developed the Federal Recovery Coordination Program (FRCP) to coordinate clinical and nonclinical services needed by severely wounded, ill, and injured service members and veterans.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/acute-care/6768/ict_strategy_promises_to_save_millions

ICT strategy promises to save millions

30 March 2011 Linda Davidson

A new strategy which the government says will save millions currently wasted on public sector ICT was published by the Cabinet Office today.

The new strategy promises to end “big bang” solutions, break the “oligopoly of big business” supplying government IT and create opportunities for SMEs.

It also heralds a move to scale back the size of government IT programmes by creating a presumption against projects having a lifetime value of more than £100m.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2011/waiting-until-2012-to-apply-for-meaningful-use-may-not-be-the-best-option-for-all.aspx

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Waiting Until 2012 To Apply for Meaningful Use May Not Be the Best Option for All Providers

In a recent iHealthBeat Perspective, Protima Advani of the Advisory Board Company suggested that health care providers wait until fiscal year 2012 to demonstrate meaningful use of electronic health records. But waiting until 2012 might not be the right solution for every health care provider. In some cases, 2011 might be a better goal date.

Achieving meaningful use requires, for most organizations, a profound number of cultural and workflow changes. Rushing to meet meaningful use might result in a lack of firm cultural foundations and poor adoption of new workflows. However, if an organization already has a solid plan for EHR adoption and is close to meeting meaningful use requirements, moving forward in 2011 might help prevent a loss of momentum and provide public relations benefits.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=76860

Standards panel explores path to stage 2 meaningful use

By Mary Mosquera

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

The Health IT Standards Committee has begun exploring some of the functions that electronic health records (EHRs) should be capable of performing in stage 2 of meaningful use, with the use of health information exchange by providers to send patients their information to a personal health record (PHR) a prominent example.

Healthcare providers will have a choice in health information exchange in later stages of meaningful use now that different methods are taking shape. Certification and standards criteria in meaningful use stages 2 and 3 should support various methods of exchange when they are coupled with standards and robust testing, according to committee members at their meeting March 29.

Dr. John Halamka, committee co-chair, posed the question about whether the committee should consider recommending as a stage 2 objective that a provider be able to perform certain kinds of transaction using one of the methods of exchange.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/federal-IT-strategic-plan-comments-42212-1.html

Comments Coming in on Fed I.T. Plan

HDM Breaking News, March 29, 2011

Since releasing the "Federal Health IT Strategic Plan for 2011-2015" on March 25, the Office of the National Coordinator has posted 24 industry comments. Here are three samples:

1. "One concern is that ONC may not have done an extensive enough review of available standards for vocabularies used in data exchange. For example, SNOMED, while comprehensive, is often convoluted and difficult to map to, particularly for use at the point of care. To date, it has also been difficult to determine how to consult or give input to ONC on available standards for vocabularies for data exchange, specifically those that are in widely adopted by EMR systems (both in the public and commercial arenas) already, but not 'accepted' for exchange by ONC."

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-264301/AMA-Launches-Mobile-App-and-Challenge

AMA Launches Mobile App and Challenge

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , March 30, 2011

The American Medical Association is making its first foray into the software development world with a free CPT (current procedural terminology) code glossary application.

So far, the app includes just 129 codes classified for evaluation and management, for consultations, critical care services, domiciliary, ED, home services, hospital inpatient, hospital observation, inpatient neonatal, newborn care, non face-to-face, nursing facility, preventive medicine, and prolonged services. But it has detailed descriptions of each code's levels of care. More codes are planned in updates.

For example, for office or other outpatient visit, one can find definitions for whether the patient visit was problem-focused, expanded problem focused, detailed, or comprehensive. Decision-tree logic and quick search options are available. And users may save frequently accessed codes by location or type of service

But the AMA wants to go beyond this single app and is offering $2,500 in cash and prizes, plus a trip to the AMA's meeting in New Orleans, for ideas to generate "the next great medical app, in the 2011 AMA App Challenge."

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110329/NEWS/303299988/

HIMSS, MGMA develop privacy toolkit for docs

By Maureen McKinney

Posted: March 29, 2011 - 12:00 pm ET

In a joint effort to help small clinics and physician practices safeguard their patients' health information, the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society has partnered with the Medical Group Management Association to produce a specialized set of easily accessible informational tools.

Called the HIMSS Privacy and Security Toolkit for Small Provider Organizations, the interactive online resource allows users to share best practices and submit new privacy- and security-related tools for consideration, according to a HIMSS news release.

-----

Aetna Taps Healthline For Patient Portal

Insurers and healthcare providers are increasingly using Web portals to comply with meaningful use, give patients ready access to medical data and other relevant information.

By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, InformationWeek

March 29, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400518

Under the government's meaningful use guidelines, healthcare organizations must provide a patient with a copy of his or her medical data within 48 hours of their requesting it. To accomplish that, many healthcare organizations are deploying patient portals. And while they're at it, they're also building in other features, like appointment scheduling and messaging.

Health insurers have been early adopters of Web portals, providing help checking the status of claims and locating doctors in their health plans. But some insurers are taking those services further, making it easier for members to find other information, such as information on illnesses, treatment cost comparisons, and physicians in a certain zip code that care for a particular condition.

Aetna is one of the insurers doing this via its Web portal, powered by software from Healthline Networks, which recently introduced a new suite of "Medically Guided" tools that feature semantic search technology, which uses the context of terms to help locate information.

-----

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=425220&version=1&template_id=36&parent_id=16

National E-Health System for All

By Bonnie James

Qatar will establish an effective and integrated national e-health system ensuring full compatibility across all levels of care and full participation by all healthcare providers.

This has been announced in the National Development Strategy (NDS) 2011-2016 launched on Monday.

It is envisaged to raise the percentage of primary care practitioners accessing the online diabetes registry from 0% to 25%.

It will be ensured that 100% of medical images taken at hospitals are digitally stored and shareable among physicians.

The percentage of community pharmacies submitting dispensing information to the e-prescription system is to be raised from 0% to 25%.

-----

http://gulftoday.ae/portal/d6ab76f8-5b58-49aa-bfa6-b9e3c1b013b4.aspx

Hospital’s e-system makes access to records easy, secure

By a staff reporter March 31, 2011

Mafraq Hospital in Abu Dhabi has launched a new electronic system for maintaining medical records, which will ensure up-to-date and easy access of medical information for both doctors and patients.

With the advent of the new completely electronic mechanism to keep patients’ medical records, the hospital officially said ‘goodbye’ to paper records.

The Cerner Electronic Medical Record System (EMR) has been introduced as part of overhauling the entire information system to provide global standard patient care and administration practices at the hospital, a top health official said.

-----

http://www.cmio.net/index.php?option=com_articles&article=26970&publication=56&view=portals

IHE-Europe Connectathon expands

The 11th annual IHE European Connectathon, to be held in Pisa, Italy, April 11-15, has expanded to a week-long program of activities.

The core activity remains the IHE-Europe Connectathon, an intensive connectivity marathon where for five days more than 300 IT engineers will test 117 systems for the interoperability of their applications used in health information systems.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110328/BLOGS02/303289999/

Open source gets its day

Joseph Conn Blog

I wrote a story for this week's Modern Healthcare magazine about the Alembic Foundation, which is assuming a caretaker role in the future development of the government-founded Connect Gateway project. The Federal Health Architecture program—overseen by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology—started the project in 2008.

I asked Dr. Robert Kolodner, former ONC head and Veterans Administration informaticist, about why open-source technology appears, finally, to be gaining some traction in health IT circles.

Kolodner said open source is in vogue because "right now, the government is more open to it." For example, he said, the ONC also is coordinating the Direct Project, another open-source software and standards package for peer-to-peer communications.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110328/NEWS/303289987/

Major 'digital divide' seen in PHR use

By Maureen McKinney

Posted: March 28, 2011 - 4:00 pm ET

Racial and ethnic minority patients are far less likely than whites to adopt an online personal health record to access and coordinate their health information, according to a study published in the March 28 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.

The study is the latest of many to point to a "digital divide," the term used to describe the disparity in access to the Internet and other forms of technology.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110324/NEWS/110329973/

Telemedicine push met with static

By Christine LaFave Grace

Posted: March 24, 2011 - 4:30 pm ET

Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook, Ill., established its eICU telemedicine program in 2003. Eight years later, it's still tweaking the program—and still working to assert the program's value to clinical staff.

The continual evolution of information technology—and, of more importance, IT's use in a clinical setting—was a major theme in “Achieving Clinical Value in the ICU with Strategic IT Utilization,” a presentation from Advocate executives Dr. Michael Ries and Cindy Welsh.

“All we hear about is IT,” said Ries, Advocate's medical director of adult critical care and eICU and an assistant professor of medicine at Chicago's Rush University. But “you cannot bring it in and expect it to change your organization.”

-----

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42218296

The iPad Is Tops With Doctors

Published: Wednesday, 23 Mar 2011 | 10:21 AM ET

By: Bertha Coombs

CNBC Reporter

There are two things Dr. Larry Nathanson can’t work without when he's on duty in the emergency ward: his stethoscope and his iPad.

After nearly a year using the tablet, it has become an integral tool for treating patients.

“As I am walking from room to room, I know who I need to see next,” he explained, scrolling through the virtual emergency room patient board on the iPad.

“I definitely feel lost when I don’t have this on a shift," he said.

-----

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703580004576180811400890264.html

  • MARCH 28, 2011

Making Clinical Trials Less of a Tribulation

The shift to electronic medical records makes it easier to recruit patients—and keep them

By JENNIFER CORBETT DOOREN

For developers of new drugs and treatments, one of the toughest hurdles has nothing to do with medicine. It's recruiting patients for clinical trials. And when it comes to recruiting minority patients, the challenge is even greater.

New approaches are being tried that can dramatically speed up the recruiting process and reach more patients from groups frequently underrepresented in studies.

At the heart of these new methods is the shift to electronic medical records, which makes patient searches faster and more methodical—in part by also allowing researchers to involve patients in trials from day one of their treatment.

In addition, some drug companies have had success reaching out to patient advocates and other experts who know what clinics and doctors are treating the kinds of patients the firms need to test certain drugs, like those used in treating HIV.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/texas-primary-care-group-uses-ibm-software-cut-hospital-readmissions/2011-03-23

Texas primary care group uses IBM software to cut hospital readmissions

March 23, 2011 — 4:35pm ET | By Ken Terry

Southeast Texas Medical Associates (SETMA), a primary care group based in Beaumont, Tex., is using IBM business analytics software to gain greater insight into hospital readmissions. The software helps the 29-doctor group identify the causes of readmissions and design interventions to prevent patients from being readmitted.

In the first six months of this project, SETMA has been able to cut the number of its hospital readmissions by 22 percent by enabling doctors to identify trends and adjust treatment protocols to improve post-discharge care.

Using the IBM application, SETMA's staff compared the characteristics of patients who were readmitted against those who were not. Among the factors they looked at were ethnicity, socioeconomic status, the follow-up care received, and how quickly they received that care. Equipped with the results of this analysis, SETMA instituted new post-acute-care treatment plans to help patients recuperate and stay out of the hospital.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/moon-landing-was-nothing-compared-onc-strategic-plan/2011-03-27-0

The moon landing was nothing compared to the ONC strategic plan

March 27, 2011 — 11:55am ET | By Ken Terry

Where will health IT be in 2015? If we achieve all of the goals of the updated Office of the National Coordinator strategic plan, it will be in an ideal state.

Everybody will have electronic health records (EHRs); all information systems will all be interoperable; EHR us ers will all achieve meaningful use (stages 2 and 3 included); there will be no more security breaches; patients will be using electronic copies of their records to manage their own health; and health IT will help healthcare reform attain its goals, including effective population health management, superb care coordination, lower costs, and optimal patient outcomes.

Of course, this is only an aspiration; nobody really believes that this vision will be achieved within five years, just as nobody believes that EHRs will be universal by 2014, as President Obama and, before him, President Bush demanded. Bush's time frame was 10 years -- roughly the same amount of time it took us to land a man on the moon. The reason why it won't happen within that time frame is that widespread health IT adoption and the ultimate goals of meaningful use are much harder to achieve than winning the "space race" was in the 1960s.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/wellness-cost-cutting-main-themes-at-health-2-0-spring-event.aspx

Monday, March 28, 2011

Wellness, Cost-Cutting Main Themes at Health 2.0 Spring Event

SAN DIEGO -- Health care leaders gathered for the Health 2.0 Spring Fling Conference last week, a two-day event organized around three main themes:

  • Wellness 2.0, prevention, exercise and food;
  • The evolution of health research; and
  • Making health care cheaper.

The conference at the La Jolla Hilton Torrey Pines in California highlighted technological innovations in health care services and information management. It also emphasized technology's potential to encourage healthier lifestyles, which in turn could help drive down the cost of care.

Technology's Role in Prevention

The conference's keynote address -- delivered by Dean Ornish, founder and president of the Preventive Medicine Research Institute -- focused on the role of technology in changing environment and behavior to facilitate healthier lifestyles. According to Ornish, 75% of the $2.5 trillion currently spent on health care in the United States is related to chronic diseases, most of which can be prevented or reversed by diet and exercise, a fact we've understood for years, he says. "We don't need a breakthrough in science but a change in implementing it, which is why 2.0 is so important," Ornish told the crowd.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Thursday, April 07, 2011

NEHTA Releases A Specialist Letter Package. Does it Add Much?

NEHTA have very recently released a package of specifications on Specialist Letters.

Specialist Letter Package

The Specialist Letter Package builds on NEHTA’s ongoing eReferrals work and closes a vital communication link between general practitioners and non-GP medical specialists. The Specialist Letter provides a standardised national approach to sharing these key clinical communications and allows for a narrative to be included as part of the letter.

What is in the draft Specialist Letter Package

NEHTA is now seeking your comment on a draft package of documents that defines the clinical business requirements and content of a specialist letter message. The package includes:

  1. Executive summary.
  2. Release notes – a summary of changes made to the document during earlier review cycles.
  3. Business Requirements Specification – a description of high-level requirements, business models and use case descriptions for specialist letters. This document outlines the specifications and guidelines to be adopted by implementers when developing nationally-interoperable referral solutions within the Australian healthcare community.
  4. Solution Design Specification ‑ defines the technical environment and is developed for the people who will build the infrastructure and the software.
  5. Core Information Component Specification ‑ defines the minimum set of data that is recommended for implementation in a system that creates and exchanges referral information within Australia.

How to be involved

NEHTA is requesting feedback from national stakeholders. The consultation period is open from Friday 25 March until Friday 27 May 2011.

The link to the site is here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/e-communications-in-practice/ereferrals/specialist-letter

Now I have to say that I see the specialist letter back to a referring practitioner as one of the most valuable pieces if clinical information one has on most patients - especially if it comes from a specialist physician.

The reason for the importance is that typically a physician will take a significant period to time to talk to, examine and investigate a patient. In documenting the encounter they will then produce an invaluable summary of the entire medical history and current situation. Done thoughtfully in the calm light of day this report back to the referrer is really a vitally useful clinical document.

Given the clinical value I see secure transmission around the health system of these documents electronically as crucial and vital.

I have had a browse of the 5 components of the package. My overall impression is that it is really not a great leap forward. Amazingly the Business Requirements Document reveals it has taken a full year to get the documents to this point and the whole issue is really pretty simple!

This slowness has meant that components that were meant to be released in 2010 are yet to see the light of day - see numbered page 1.

The good news is that the work has been released in draft with a reasonable comment window. Yeah!

I guess what amazes me is how NEHTA persists in maximising the complexity of moving forward.

While there is clearly sense in having the electronic specialist letter having all the necessary identifiers and contents fully defined and codified in the long term would not a good first step be to use simple messaging containing the basic header information and a .pdf or .doc of the actual letter to get information flows started.

I think this is what is talked of as the current state in the Solution Design Document.

Quickly NEHTA then seems to move to its idea of the interim approach with HL7 CDA, Terminology and a much for complex structure.

The future state then adds a whole lot more with HI Services, NASH, Endpoint Location Services and so on.

In summary this is a roadmap with no time-frame attached. What I would like to see, as a first step, is access to the current state fully implemented for all clinicians and then incremental moves forward. By taking the long view we keep ignoring those who have not yet started the journey and need to be got going. Certainly there are more than a few specialists in that category.

So, kudos for seeing and recognising how important the Specialist Letter is and brickbats for again not sponsoring an incremental improvement approach bringing along all users.

After reviewing the 4 Cornered Presentations regarding the PCEHR is it absolutely obvious that if anything is to be going by mid-2012 then the KISS principle will have to be rigorously applied. This document does not really reflect any understanding of that reality as neither do most of the present NEHTA specifications.

David.

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

Observations on the Four Cornered PCEHR Workshop - March, 30 2011.

I have now listened through most of the discussions. The link to the presentations and registration to view the web-casts is here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2011/04/webcasts-from-four-cornered-roundtable.html

Some really clear messages emerge:

1. It is clear there are a lot of different perspectives from the Clinicians, Consumers, Vendors and Government and the work of aligning the often disparate views is not anywhere near done.

2. It is obvious that the obsession with having something working by July 1, 2012 is driving activity in ways that are probably not optimal. The political requirements looks to be distorting what is happening.

3. There is a lot of clinician concern about workflow and access to information impacts. It is not at all clear - even now - just how all this is actually going to work!

4. The Concept of Operations which is to be released very soon (Thursday 7/4/2011 possibly) has a huge number of open items (over 40) with a huge number of use cases still being worked through.

5. There was very clear concern that the governance of the overall program was quite chaotic and that no-one owned the program and was really accountable for delivery.

6. At least some in the room clearly understood just how gargantuan this undertaking actually was and recognised it as a decade long program. The scale of software change and development is really huge. Obtaining co-operation and use will equally take a very long time!

7. No clear benefits or business case was made by the proponents of the PCEHR.

8. The usual issues of privacy, balance of ease of use and access control, what information should be contributed by consumers and who controls just what in an information sense seem quite unresolved.

9. NEHTA made it clear the Wave 1 and 2 sites are experimental and that technology selections for the final national infrastructure for the PCEHR system will depend on the outcomes in these sites. This makes it even more unlikely anything real will be in place by the deadline.

Overall watching was worthwhile, but I am now more convinced than ever the way the PCEHR has been conceived is overly complex and is not deliverable in any real sense in the unreasonable and politically driven deadline.

Just today we had this in 6minutes.

PCEHR pledged for July 2012

Patients will be able to start building their own Personally-Controlled E-Health Record (PCEHR) from July 2012, the head of the Federal health department Jane Halton has announced.

.....

She said a 'concept of operations' document will be released soon to give more details about the $467 million program being overseen by the National E-Health Transition Agency (NEHTA).

NEHTA chief executive Peter Fleming said the 2012 PCEHR rollout would be an ambitious target, and he likened it to US President John F Kennedy pledging to put a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s.

Full article here:

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/pcehr-pledged-for-july-2012

Clearly Peter Fleming has no doubt of the scale of what he is attempting!

David.

Tuesday, April 05, 2011

HL7 Watch Blog Has Two More Very Interesting Posts. I Suspect These Conversations Are Valuable.

The following two very interesting posts appeared over the last few days.

First we had:

http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/2011/03/rise-and-fall-of-hl7.html

Thursday, March 31, 2011

The Rise and Fall of HL7

Interfaceware is a Toronto-based HL7 solutions provider whose customers include the CDC, Cerner, GE Medical Systems, IBM, Johns Hopkins Medical, the Mayo Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, Partners Healthcare Systems Inc., Philips, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, the Veterans Administration, and Welch Allyn.

At 2.57pm EDT today, March 31, 2011, on what will surely prove to be a historic day in the advance of healthcare information technology in the direction of reason and light Eliot Muir -- the founder and CEO of Interfaceware -- posted the following comment, which I here reproduce in full:

The Rise and Fall of HL7

That might seem an unusual comment from what is supposed to be an HL7 middleware vendor. But times are changing and that is not where I see our future.

Standards do not exist in a vacuum. To be successful standards must address market needs and solve real problems so people can make or save money. Writing code costs money. Less than 0.01% of code gets written for free. The majority of code is written by people that are being paid to solve problems with it.

There are plenty of standards which are not worth the paper they are printed on because are are not sufficiently useful or practical.

Complicated standards can be pushed for a while but ultimately markets reject them. Even governments will ultimately reject complicated standards, through a democratic correction process. Although they usually waste a fair amount of other people's money along the way.

Lots more here:

http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/2011/03/rise-and-fall-of-hl7.html

The second post came a few days later:

Saturday, April 02, 2011

The Fall of the RIM

In his comment of 4/02/2011 to our "The Rise and Fall of HL7" thread, Graham Grieve argues that, in spite of all the objections advanced by Elliot Muir and in the comments above, there is value in HL7 V3 nonetheless -- because the RIM provides a 'semantic standard', and "the future of HL7 isn't about syntax or technology, it's about semantics."

Grahame and Jobst and I (and, I am sure, also Thomas) agree that there is "benefit in commonly agreed semantics". The thesis that has served as the central pillar of this blog since its inception, however, is that after 14 years of development effort, and after so many failures, we should finally accept that the RIM is not able to serve as basis for the needed commonly agreed-upon semantics.

HL7 Watch and others have provided considerable documentation that the RIM is both counter-intuitive and unnecessarily complex; that it is thus difficult to teach and difficult to document (and thus inconsistently documented); and that it is therefore difficult if not impossible to implement.

Moreover, multiple arguments have been provided to demonstrate that, even if it were implemented, the RIM would still not bring about the end which its defenders seek, namely: consistency of semantics. This is because the RIM's own semantics is so counter-intuitive, and thus so inconsistently documented, that its different users will inevitably produce semantically inconsistent implementations, thereby resurrecting the very problems which had led to the conception of the RIM in the first place.

We have learned much in the field of semantics in the 14 RIM years, and what has been learned can now be used as the basis for a better and simpler solution. It is time to start again.

Lots more here:

http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/2011/04/fall-of-rim.html

There are some comments following each of the blogs.

This posting is really simply to alert readers to this discussion and to see what people in this part of the world think.

Other posts on this topic have met with considerable interest so I felt it was worthwhile to provide this post.

David.

Webcasts from Four Cornered Roundtable Are Now Available On Line.

For those that have the time - there are about six hours of content - a series of recordings of the day’s sessions are now available.

Here is the link:

http://www.meetview.com/nehta20110330/

From here you can download presentations (as .pdfs) and also sign up to watch all the sessions by entering here:

Enter Webcast Lobby This webcast requires registration.
Archive enabled until: March 30, 2012

Lots of fun reading and watching.

David.

Monday, April 04, 2011

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 04 April, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment:

There have been three major developments I have spotted this week.

First iSoft has now officially disappeared as a separate Australian company.

Second the Government’s choice of 9 additional pilot sites for the PCEHR have been announced.

Third NEHTA has released initial specifications for a Specialist Letter Package.

All in all, quite a big week.

-----

http://www.cio.com.au/article/381341/doha_announes_second_wave_e-health_sites/

DoHA announces second wave e-health sites

The latest nine sites include maternity at the Mater Hospital, sites in North and South Brisbane and sites across NT, SA and the ACT

Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon, this morning announced nine new e-health implementation sites with $55 million of funding

The Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) has unveiled the second wave of e-health implementation sites to deploy and trial specific aspects of the Gillard Government’s $466.7 million personally controlled electronic health records (PCEHR) initiative.

Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon, said the announced e-health implementation sites, to join the initial three sites in Brisbane, the Hunter Valley and Melbourne East, was the next step in the Federal Government’s health reform project.

“In these nine projects we can see practical examples of how e-health can improve heath care for patients,” Roxon said in a statement.

-----

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/nine-new-e-health-pilots-but-doubts-linger

Nine new e-health pilots, but doubts linger

A further nine new e-health pilot sites and projects have been announced (link) by health minister Nicola Roxon, who says they will bring the personally controlled e-health record a step closer to reality.

The new pilot sites include GP divisions and hospitals, with Brisbane becoming an ‘e-health super site’, as most of the citiy’s divisions and the Mater Hospital involved, the minister says.

“Our 12 e-health lead implementation sites are aiming to have more than half a million Australians enrolled before the national launch of e-health records next year,” Ms Roxon said.

-----

http://www.pharmacynews.com.au/news/guild-excited-over-e-health-announcement

Guild excited over e-Health announcement

Community pharmacy has received a “big endorsement,” with Fred IT being announced as one-of-nine new programs in the roll-out of personally controlled e-health records (PCEHR).

Speaking to Pharmacy News immediately after the Government revealed the Fred IT MedView project would receive a share in the $55 million funding available for the second wave of programs Kos Sclavos, national president of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia said, it was “a big day for pharmacy”.

The Guild owned company’s project will focus on the Geelong region as part of the Government PCEHR roll-out, with pharmacies and GP surgeries there trialling the system.

-----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/roxon-launches-9-new-e-health-projects-339312208.htm

Roxon launches 9 new e-health projects

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au on March 29th, 2011

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon has announced the next wave of projects to pave the way for a national implementation of personally controlled e-health records (PCEHR).

The Federal Government has allocated $55 million to nine new projects to carry the torch following e-health lead implementations in the Hunter Valley, Brisbane and Melbourne last year.

"In these nine projects we can see practical examples of how e-health can improve healthcare for patients," Roxon said in a statement.

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/national/electronic-health-records-planned-20110329-1cexj.html

Electronic health records planned

Kate Hagan

March 30, 2011

UP TO half a million patients, including the chronically ill, will be the first to receive electronic health records under Labor's radical plan to overhaul the way medical data is kept.

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon yesterday announced $55 million for nine projects, to be run by various groups including pharmacists, general practitioners and hospitals.

They include a Geelong project for doctors to view all medicines prescribed and dispensed to a particular patient. Pharmacy Guild of Australia president Kos Sclavos said it would be the first time that clinicians could see a combined list of medicines, regardless of how many doctors and pharmacists the patient had attended.

-----

http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/e-health-focus-moves-away-from-primary-care--agpn

E-health focus moves away from primary care: AGPN

The AGPN has accused the Federal government of moving away from primary care with its latest round of e-health pilot sites.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon announced a further nine new e-health pilot sites and projects yesterday, with Brisbane becoming an ‘e-health super site’.

But AGPN Chair Dr Emil Djakic has raised concerns that the latest round represents “a step backwards” away from the primary health care sector with a stronger drift towards the hospital sector.

And he has accused the government of delivering an eHealth agenda so focused on hospitals that it has “undermined the development of a patient-centric, coordinated, cross sector electronic health system.”

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/winners-of-e-health-grant-to-be-revealed-by-minister/story-e6frgakx-1226029657604

Winners of e-health grant to be revealed by minister

HEALTH Minister Nicola Roxon will announce today successful bidders for the $55 million e-health funding pot and unveil nine new sites for her $467m personally controlled record program.

Ms Roxon's spokesman has confirmed the second wave of sites will be revealed, and will build on the three initial lead implementation sites involving GP Partners in Brisbane, GP Access in the NSW Hunter Valley and Melbourne East.

"The target for the first 12 sites will be to enrol more than half a million Australians before the national launch of the PCEHR (personally controlled electronic health record) next year," he said.

-----

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/officials-defy-er-deaths-directive/story-e6frfku0-1226029820479

Queensland Health defies data directive over deaths in emergency departments

QUEENSLAND Health has defied a ruling from the state's Information Commissioner to release critical data about the state's hospitals.

In an unprecedented move, Queensland Health has taken legal action to keep secret the information about deaths in public hospital emergency departments.

Earlier this month, Right to Information Commissioner Clare Smith ordered Queensland Health to hand over the information to The Courier-Mail following a long-running battle to better understand the state's overwhelmed emergency departments.

-----

http://www.nehta.gov.au/e-communications-in-practice/ereferrals/specialist-letter

Specialist Letter Package

The Specialist Letter Package builds on NEHTA’s ongoing eReferrals work and closes a vital communication link between general practitioners and non-GP medical specialists. The Specialist Letter provides a standardised national approach to sharing these key clinical communications and allows for a narrative to be included as part of the letter.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/381162/e-health_back_spotlight_nsw/?eid=-6787&uid=25465

e-health back in the spotlight for NSW

Telehealth technology centre at Nepean Hospital one of the first priorities for Coalition

Health services in NSW have been in limbo pending the outcome of the election, but the landslide victory by the Barry O’Farrell-led Coalition is likely to precipitate a frenzy of activity as the new government looks to implement its e-health policies.

Jillian Skinner will take on the role of Health Minister within the new government. During the election campaign, the NSW Coalition’s policies focussed on health issue prevention, openness, better management of chronic disease and increased community involvement in the running of the NSW public health system.

Now, the industry is beginning to call on the government to make good on its promises.

-----

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/onus-on-ofarrell-to-end-labors-state-secrecy-20110330-1cgdz.html

Onus on O'Farrell to end Labor's state secrecy

Matthew Moore

March 31, 2011

THE new Premier is facing an early test of his commitment to open government after the outgoing Labor administration attempted to keep secret public service briefs prepared for incoming ministers.

Barry O'Farrell must decide whether to release the ''blue books'' prepared by government officials to brief his administration on key issues after the former government told departments to prepare these documents for an ''incoming cabinet''. Telling departmental heads these briefs are prepared for cabinet has ensured agencies are refusing requests for access to them on the grounds they are cabinet documents and not accessible under the new state freedom of information law called GIPAA - Government Information (Public Access) Act.

The move by the former government puts NSW at odds with the federal government, which has released public service briefs called red books (for Labor governments) in response to freedom of information requests from journalists.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/m-aid-in-generic-pill-push/story-fn59niix-1226030999623

$2.7m 'aid' in generic pill push

  • Adam Cresswell, Health editor
  • From: The Australian
  • March 31, 2011 12:00AM

GENERIC drug-makers showered pharmacists with movie tickets, computer software or equipment and other benefits worth $2.7 million last year, triggering concerns that hidden financial deals are deciding what pills patients receive.

The first report on the benefits that generic companies paid, other than through price discounting, shows that five out of the industry's six companies provided such benefits.

In one of the disclosures, Hospira -- a leading supplier of generic injectable drugs -- revealed it paid $874,006 to a number of unnamed hospitals to help provide nurses qualified to care for patients with mental or movement disorders. The declaration insists the hospitals "have absolutely no obligation to prescribe" the drugs in question, clozapine and apomorphine.

Another company, Apotex, paid $410,154 to pharmacists last year for a range of benefits, including vouchers and movie tickets, and "software tools designed to increase generic substitution" -- meaning they would help pharmacists to replace branded medicine a doctor had prescribed for a patient with a cheaper but chemically identical generic product.

-----

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/patient-privacy-concerns-over-disturbing-new-laws

Patient privacy concerns over ‘disturbing’ new laws

29th Mar 2011

Byron Kaye

MEDICARE has been granted Commonwealth powers to force GPs to hand over patient records, prompting concerns that non-medical bureaucrats will be able to lawfully inspect confidential personal information.

Legislation passed by Federal Parliament last week, backed by both major parties, will increase Medicare compliance audits fivefold and will force doctors to produce requested documentation – including patient notes – when suspected of inappropriate claims.

Previously, doctors have not been legally obliged to provide documents, and one in five has refused when audited, the Federal Government claims. Under the new laws, however, doctors face hefty fines for refusing to cooperate with Medicare.

-----

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/extra-200m-needed-to-save-healthsmart-20110331-1cngi.html

Extra $200m needed to save HealthSMART

Rafael Epstein

April 1, 2011

VICTORIA'S Health Department will have to spend $200 million more to rescue the $360 million already spent on its troubled health technology program, including HealthSMART.

The over-run, more than half of HealthSMART's original cost, was in departmental advice delivered to the Baillieu government, and seen by The Age. The advice says as much as $95 million will be needed to complete HealthSMART's original plan for a computer system linking 10 big hospitals and giving medical staff immediate access to patient records.

The advice says that not only is the $95 million injection needed urgently, but also that it is not enough because it ''does not make allowances for major capital projects under way'' such as the new Royal Children's Hospital and the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/dream-ends-for-isoft-with-300m-buyout/story-e6frgakx-1226030527556

Dream ends for iSoft with $300m buyout

WHEN Gary Cohen's IBA Health agreed to buy troubled British group iSoft in 2007, he had visions of creating one of the largest healthcare information technology providers in the world.

Cohen, who was ousted last year from the company now called iSoft, is infamous for dreaming big but delivering little.

What followed was years of underperformance that has left the share price at 5c, compared with the $1.21 it closed at on the day IBA announced its agreement with iSoft, and debt of about $260 million -- more than four and a half times its current market capitalisation.

-----

http://delimiter.com.au/2011/03/30/will-csc-buy-troubled-isoft/

Will CSC buy troubled iSOFT?

Multiple media outlets are speculating that IT services giant CSC might buy troubled Australian e-health company iSOFT, in a move that will finally give CSC full control over the company it has long partnered with in the UK Government’s makeover of its national health technology systems.

With its share price continuing to plunge, last week iSOFT went into a trading halt, stating it wanted to halt its shares being traded ahead of an update on its long-running strategic review process. On Monday, iSOFT extended the halt, stating that ‘proposals’ it had received as part of the process were not sufficiently advanced to permit their disclosure to investors.

-----

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/more-divisions-split-over-medicare-locals

More divisions split over Medicare Locals

29th Mar 2011

Byron Kaye

BIDDING for Medicare Locals (MLs) has led to another bitter rift between GP divisions, with accusations that some are spreading false information now tainting the contest to become the hub for Sydney’s south-west.

With the deadline for the initial round of ML submissions next week, an AGPN-appointed mediator has been called in to instigate talks between Bankstown-based South West Sydney Health Coalition (SWSHC) and rival joint bidders the Macarthur Division of General Practice and the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice.

The talks came after Bankstown GP Division CEO Andrey Zheluk, whose division is spearheading the SWSHC bid, accused his rivals of claiming to be the “official bid” for the area’s ML.

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/NBN-e-health-Medibank-Private-Jo-Wright-pd20110331-FFRUH?OpenDocument

A model to unlock NBN profits

Rob Burgess

Published 7:41 AM, 31 Mar 2011

Medical practitioners don't get too excited by money, preferring to convert dollar figures into 'health outcomes'. Pah. No imagination.

But the rest of the business community should be watching a number of medical trials very closely in the coming year. The federal government has just doled out $55 million to fund 'second wave' e-health trials that promise to save vast pots of money. (Or as practitioners would say, 'make it available elsewhere for better health outcomes').

One of the largest trials, being run by Medibank Private, is creating personally controlled e-health records (PCEHR) that allow patients to set up online health records that can be accessed from just about anywhere. Around 28,000 clients in its chronic disease management programs will benefit.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/in-depth/high-prices-force-nbn-to-suspend-cabling-tender-process-and-look-elsewhere/story-e6frgaif-1226031831542

High prices force NBN to suspend cabling tender process and look elsewhere

THE company overseeing the national broadband network will seek new builders after suspending its cabling tender process because price demands were too high.

NBN Co's head of corporate services, Kevin Brown, said the suspension, after five months of negotiations with 14 construction businesses, was because of a disagreement about the assumptions they had built into their pricing regimes.

He said the company would not build the $36 billion network "at any price".

"We have thoroughly benchmarked our project against similar engineering and civil works projects in Australia and overseas and we will not proceed on the basis of prices we are currently being offered," Mr Brown said in a statement.

------

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/381856/nbn_co_begins_plan_b_talks/?fp=4&fpid=5

NBN Co begins plan B talks

Plan B NBN partner unlikely to receive full fibre budget

NBN Co has refused to confirm or deny talks with Leighton Holdings over construction of the National Broadband Network (NBN) on the mainland, but the wholesaler expects any “plan B” partner will not receive the entirety of the fibre build-out budget.

The company this week scrapped tenders offered by 14 shortlisted companies for business-as-usual construction of the $36 billion network after four rounds of negotiations, instead choosing to begin talks with an “alternative different party” in order to gain acceptable prices for the network.

The fibre portion of the network is expected to cost $10 billion, with an additional $2 billion to be spent on installing fibre at greenfield sites as part of an obligation handed to NBN Co at the beginning of the year.

-----

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/8153.0Main+Features1Dec%202010?OpenDocument

8153.0 - Internet Activity, Australia, Dec 2010

Latest ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 01/04/2011 Released Today

.....

HIGHLIGHTS

  • At the end of December 2010, there were 10.4 million active internet subscribers in Australia (excluding internet connections through mobile handsets). This represents annual growth of 16.7% and an increase of 9.9% since the end of June 2010.
  • The phasing out of dial-up internet connections continued with 93% of internet connections being non dial-up. Australians also continued to access increasingly faster download speeds, with 81% of access connections offering a download speed of 1.5Mbps or greater.
  • Digital subscriber line (DSL) continued to be the major technology for connections, accounting for 43% of the total internet connections, followed closely by mobile wireless (40% of total internet connections). However, the DSL percentage share has decreased since June 2010 when DSL represented 44% of the total connections.
  • Mobile wireless (excluding mobile handset connections) was the fastest growing internet access technology in actual numbers, increasing from 2.8 million in December 2009 to 4.2 million in December 2010.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 64 – Results – 04 April, 2011.

The question was:

What Score Would You Give NEHTA / DoHA for their Efforts so far in Explaining The PCEHR Program to Consumers?

The answers were as follows:

10/10

- 5 (12%)

7.5/10

- 2 (5%)

5/10

- 1 (2%)

2.5/10

- 5 (12%)

0/10

- 27 (67%)

Well that is seems pretty clear with only 19% giving them a score of 5 or above! Clearly any money spent on consumer communications has also been wasted!

Votes : 40

Again, many thanks to those that voted!

David.

Sunday, April 03, 2011

Is The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) an Evidence Based Intervention? - A Draft for Comment.

I have been asked to write a short article for a Health Magazine. I thought I would try it out to get a little feedback. Please feel free to make this better and more accurate!

------

As a consequence of a series of recommendations in the Final Report to Government of National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) in 2009 the subsequent Commonwealth Budget allocated almost half a billion dollars over two years to make a PCEHR available to all citizens who wanted one by July 2012.

As the PCEHR has evolved - largely away from the public gaze and in secret - it has morphed into a conceptual Health Summary and then a series of Event Summaries. The Health Summary contents are intended to be the basic individual demographic details and the information that is normally held - either electronically or on paper - in the General Practitioners Summary Record. This would include allergies, regular medications, key elements of history and current diagnoses. The Event Summaries are envisaged to be such things as a set of pathology results, referral letters and so on.

The idea is that the patient will be in control of this information and will, if they agree and consent, make the information held in this record available to clinicians caring for the patient.

The patient PCEHR record is to be held by a PCEHR system - presumably run by the Commonwealth Government - which will be accessible via a web portal for a clinician, with permission, to review. At a later date the patient will also be able to contribute their personal information and comments should they choose. The system is apparently intended to be a lifelong record which will be accumulated over time.

At present the system is intended to be available for patients who choose to have a PCEHR to register for access by July 2012 - now just 14 months away. The system is presently planned to operate in an ‘opt-in’ fashion where an individual takes a positive decision to register for and establish a PCEHR.

Key points to be noted about the presently proposed model of the PCEHR include:

First the PCEHR is an additional and clearly parallel health record to that held by the health care provider.

Second the PCEHR will contain a summary of the full patient record.

Third there is no clarity just what arrangements are intended to ensure the copy of the clinical information held in the PCEHR is properly synchronised and consistent with the current practitioner record.

Fourth all the documentation made available to date has been silent on just how the situation of a patient attending multiple practitioners is handled.

Fifth there is no mention of just what advantages the PCEHR proposal has over the wide range of alternatives that have been successfully implemented elsewhere and just why clinicians would find access to a record of this sort of any great value compared with known alternatives.

Sixth the PCEHR is not linked / attached to the practitioner record in any direct way. This means that functionality such as secure direct communication between clinician and patient, appointment and repeat prescription requests direct and access to current information in provider system is not available.

Sadly, as of the time of writing, the Department of Health has not released the PCEHR Concept of Operations for public review so some details provided above may turn out to be updated in some way or other.

On the basis of what is presently known just how based in evidence of real positive clinical impact are the present proposals?

I would suggest they are not and that the claimed rationale for this very substantial program is based on a combination of wishful thinking and ignorance.

My reading of the global literature leads me to the following conclusions.

First there is no working example anywhere in the world of a parallel longitudinal patient controlled electronic health record. There are successful examples in small countries (Wales and Scotland) of emergency health summaries derived from GP systems being implemented - but the information content is designed as the minimum necessary for emergency care - not as an information rich long term longitudinal record.

Second the evidence from the UK suggests that even when such summary information is made available to actual use of the information is quite low and the clinical impact - if any is hard to determine.

Third designing systems to be ‘opt-in’, while politically easier, ensures that adoption is slow - over years - and for this reason few will bother to look up such systems.

Fourth the present plans for seeking consent for both access and for information provision into the PCEHR will have very significant clinician workflow impacts - i.e. slow clinicians down - which will ensure that without major financial incentives to compensate for the time costs clinician usage will also be minimal.

Fifth, while there has been much research on the topic, it has not been possible to consistently demonstrated positive clinical outcomes through the use of Personal Health Records (PHRs). On the other hand the evidence for the value of provider Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), especially with embedded clinical decision support, is very strong indeed.

Sixth adoption of and the value of patient access to their clinical records is best seen in situations where the PHR is a linked extension of the provider EMR (as in Kaiser Permanente in the US) and where other functions are possible

Seventh it is clear that the so called ‘digital divide’ is alive and well with patient portals where often those who need them most are the least likely to be able to obtain access.

It is thus my contention - in this very short article - that the PCEHR proposal lacks an evidence base in circumstances where there are evidence based interventions which would make a more significant and important difference to health care delivery in Australia.

The PCEHR has been termed by one wag the ‘Politically Correct’ EHR. I would suggest it is a proposal that requires very active evidence based review that it is presently not receiving - due in part to the very large sums of money being splashed around by the Department of Health on the project - which seems to be resulting in some form of unthinking and uncritical e-Health ‘goldrush’. As presently announced the entire program has unrealistic timelines, lacks clear objectives and will, when it inevitably fails, I fear it will set the prospect for rational adoption of e-Health back a good decade.

Dr David More is a clinician and health informatician who blogs about e-Health in Australia at www.aushealthit.blogspot.com.

----- End article.

All comments welcome!

David.