Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 21st April, 2012.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

5 keys to IT and the physician-patient relationship

By Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
Created 04/12/2012
As the concept of patient-centered care continues to evolve, a key to its success is the relationship between physician and patient. But factor in all the technologies springing up left and right, and finding the perfect balance between patient engagement and new IT initiatives can be tricky.
"Focusing specifically on the physician-patient relationship – it's behind the rest of the world," said Steve Wigginton, CEO of Medley Health, a medical practice marketing and communication services company. "But there are a lot of benefits to be had. More information is readily available to physicians as a result of IT, and therefore, it's easier for them to keep track of what's going on with their patients."
-----

Patients Make Poor Health-Care Consumers, Says Quest Diagnostics’ CMO

Are patients good consumers of healthcare?
Nope, says Jon Cohen, a vascular surgeon and chief medical officer at Quest Diagnostics. The average American spends twice as much time before buying a TV as they do looking for a doctor, he told participants today at TEDMED in Washington.
“Consumer-driven healthcare doesn’t work because people don’t want health care,” he said.
The three main factors that drive consumers to make a choice: price, quality and desire, said Cohen. When it comes to health care, however, price doesn’t correspond with quality, so going to a more expensive doctor doesn’t guarantee better treatment.
-----

Do We Need Doctors Or Algorithms?

Vinod Khosla
Tuesday, January 10th, 2012
Editor’s note: This is Part II of a guest series written by legendary Silicon Valley investor Vinod Khosla, the founder of Khosla Ventures. In Part I, he laid the groundwork by describing how artificial intelligence is a combination of human and computer capabilities. In Part III, he will talk about how technology will sweep through education.
I was asked about a year ago at a talk about energy what I was doing about the other large social problems, namely health care and education. Surprised, I flippantly responded that the best solution was to get rid of doctors and teachers and let your computers do the work, 24/7 and with consistent quality.
Later, I got to cogitating about what I had said and why, and how embarrassingly wrong that might be. But the more I think about it the more I feel my gut reaction was probably right. The beginnings of “Doctor Algorithm” or Dr. A for short, most likely (and that does not mean “certainly” or “maybe”) will be much criticized. We’ll see all sorts of press wisdom decrying “they don’t work” or “look at all the silly things they come up with.” But Dr A. will get better and better and will go from providing “bionic assistance” to second opinions to assisting doctors to providing first opinions and as referral computers (with complete and accurate synopses and all possible hypotheses of the hardest cases) to the best 20% of the human breed doctors. And who knows what will happen beyond that?
-----

5 keys to EHRs supporting next-generation business models

By Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
Created 04/11/2012
With the rise of accountable care organizations (ACOs) and patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), the spotlight has been put on IT to help make a smoother transition to those new care models. And although the partnership between patient and EHR plays a critical role in their success, Shahid Shah, software analyst and author of the blog The Healthcare IT Guy, believes EHRs have a long way to go before they can take on the full responsibility of supporting these organizations.
"Today's reality of patient management is 'disjointed care,' and most of the collaborators in a patient's care team don't know what each other is doing for the patient in real time," he said. 
-----

EHRs a major cause of patient info breaches

By mdhirsch
Created Apr 12 2012 - 9:27am
The "aggressive" adoption of electronic health records is one of the biggest reasons for the rise in security breaches of patient records, according to HIMSS' latest analytics report [1] on the security of patient data.
The report, commissioned by Kroll Advisory Solutions, noted that with the move to patient records in electronic form, the data is more vulnerable since it's more accessible and mobile. Of the respondent hospitals that have reported a security breach of patient information, 22 percent reported that the data compromised had been in electronic form--such as a computer or mobile device--double the amount reported in 2010. Most of the breaches involved theft or loss.
-----

New Patient Safety App Challenge from ONC

APR 11, 2012 4:27pm ET
The Office of the National Coordinator for HIT has launched a new challenge for development of a specific health information technology application.
The Reporting Patient Safety Events Challenge seeks an application to facilitate reporting of safety incidents in hospital and ambulatory settings.
-----
By Joseph Conn

Breaches, hackers and the wisdom of encryption

The recent breach of patient-identifiable healthcare records in Utah is unusual, but not unique, in that it reportedly involved the work of hackers and the extent of the exposure was not immediately known.
According to the publicly available segment of the 410 major breach reports collected by HHS' Office for Civil Rights, 24 (not quite 6%) were the result of hacking, primarily of computer servers. Those 24 breaches exposed 550,083 patients' records, or just 3% of the nearly 19.2 million records involved in all 410 reported incidents involving more than 500 patient records.
So far, the Utah breach, at the latest report could involve as many as 780,000 beneficiaries of the state's Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program participants. That would make it the single-largest breach involving hacking since the civil rights office began collecting breach reports in September 2009 under a congressional mandate.
-----

Fierce Q&A: Data governance plan crucial for winning providers' trust

By danb
Created Apr 12 2012 - 12:55pm
A clear data governance plan that includes how data will be collected, maintained and protected is a must for any hospital planning on pushing a big-data initiative, Computer Sciences Corporation senior research analyst Jared Rhoads writes in the company's latest whitepaper, "Transforming Healthcare Through Better Use of Data [1]."
According to Rhoads, such a plan is crucial to winning providers' trust.
-----

New electronic medical record system to further enhance exchange of vital patient information at Group Health Centre in Sault Ste. Marie

April 12, 2012 (Sault Ste. Marie, ON) - Canada Health Infoway Inc. (Infoway) and the Group Health Centre (GHC) today launched a new $3.3-million initiative, the Group Health Centre Ambulatory EMR and Hospital Information System Connect Project. This project will revitalize GHC's I.T. infrastructure and integrate it with local hospital and provincial electronic health record (EHR) systems to enhance quality of care and share information between healthcare settings. Alignment with provincial and national EMR and EHR initiatives are critical elements of the project.
GHC's existing EMR has been used by local clinicians to store and share information amongst authorized healthcare providers for more than 15 years. While this system has helped position GHC as an EMR leader, the time has come to replace the existing EMR solution with the next generation of EMR.
-----
Thursday, April 12, 2012

New Leader, New Plan, New EHR Initiative for Cal eConnect

Laura Landry has worked at Cal eConnect since it was formed by the state two years ago, but she looks at the organization a little differently now. After spending the last six months as interim CEO, Landry was officially named CEO on March 19.
Her new position gives her a different perspective -- the overview.
"I think we're on the verge of a breakthrough," Landry said. "People talk about making changes at the speed of trust, and we're at the point where we've engaged stakeholders ... and now we're giving them the things that they need to get things done. We're right on the cusp of making health information easier, making it easier to do health information."
-----

Blog Explains Direct Project Secure Messaging

APR 10, 2012 11:56am ET
Greg Meyer, a director and principal architect at Cerner Corp., has written the first of three blogs that are a plain English tutorial of the government-funded Direct Project secure messaging service.
-----

Utah Breach Shows Vulnerability of Health Records

By NICOLE PERLROTH
 April 10, 2012, 10:29 am
Eastern European hackers have stolen personal records for 780,000 people in the breach of a computer server in Utah.
The list of victims include recipients of Medicaid and a health care program for low-income children in Utah, officials at Utah’s Department of Health said in a statement. Hackers were able to breach the servers by exploiting a technician’s weak password. On March 30, they downloaded 24,000 files to computers in Eastern Europe. Each file contained records for hundreds of recipients.
Utah’s Department of Health has updated the number of victims three times. It initially said 24,000 people were affected but by Monday evening, the list had expanded to include 780,000. Of those, the department said 280,000 had their Social Security numbers stolen, according to the revised statement.
-----

Epic “ready for NHS”

Two of the senior executives at Epic talk to EHI editor Jon Hoeksma about why “the Epic way” may be the way forward for some trusts in the NHS.
4 April 2012
Author: Jon Hoeksma
The chief operating officer of US electronic patient record vendor Epic says the firm is ready for the NHS, is optimistic about its chances and sincerely hopes it will win the high-profile Cambridge procurement.
In an exclusive interview with eHealth Insider at HIMSS12, Las Vegas, Carl Dvorak, executive vice president, Epic, and Leslie Karls, who is leading on the NHS, said the company had first started engaging with the NHS in England in the mid 2000s, at the request of NHS Connecting for Health.
“Six or seven years ago we decided the NHS market wasn’t right for us, but we’ve been keeping watch of developments and been getting more enquiries from the UK.”
-----

HIMSS: Hospitals must be more 'proactive' about data breach prevention

By danb
Created Apr 11 2012 - 1:48pm
Hospitals and health organizations need to be more proactive about preventing health data breaches, concluded the authors of the recently released "2012 HIMSS Analytics Report: Security of Patient Data." The report [1] said most facilities are too wrapped up in compliance issues to focus on keeping patient data protected.
"While increased regulation and better-articulated guidance have led to increases in privacy and security measures within hospitals, they also have contributed to a false sense of security within organizations that comply with these mandates," the report's authors wrote. "Despite the increase in the number of breach incidents reported, most hospitals continue to believe that if they are more prepared, they are more secure."
-----

Breaches epidemic despite efforts at compliance, says Kroll

By Mike Miliard, Managing Editor
Created 04/10/2012
NEW YORK – A new study from HIMSS Analytics and Kroll Advisory Solutions shows that, a diligent focus on security compliance notwithstanding, healthcare providers are still badly lacking when it comes to privacy protections. In fact, data breaches have only increased in recent years.
According to the 2012 "HIMSS Analytics Report: Security of Patient Data," increasingly stringent regulatory activity with regard to reporting and auditing procedures – and increased compliance from providers – haven't done anything to prevent an uptick in breaches over the past six years.
The report is the third iteration of Kroll’s biannual survey of healthcare providers nationwide.
-----

Civil liberties group criticizes health information exchanges over privacy

A lack of standards on sharing data could put patient records at risk, according to a report.

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, amednews staff. Posted April 10, 2012.
A report by the New York Civil Liberties Union examining health information exchanges in the state questioned the legalities of the patient privacy policies in place and criticized the exchanges for not doing enough to protect patients.
The findings are applicable to health information exchanges across the country, the report’s author says, because there are no established best practices for the sharing of data through HIE organizations. New York is often viewed as a leader in such exchanges, as it had some of the first ones in the nation.
Corrine Carey, assistant legislative director of the NYCLU and author of the report, said because information can be uploaded to an HIE without patient consent, the NYCLU and other patient privacy groups have argued that these policies are not consistent with state law, which requires physicians to get consent from a patient before transferring records to a third party. Patients do, however, have to give consent before those files can be accessed by another physician, which makes the policies consistent with the law, according to the New York State Dept. of Health.
-----
April 10, 2012

EHR Study Update: Top reasons for implementing EHR

By Michael McBride
When asked what their top reasons were for implementing an electronic health record (EHR) system, 95% of the EHR Study's participating physicians listed "to achieve meaningful use" as the primary motivation. For 53% of the doctors polled, "to improve patient quality of care" came in at a distant second-place motivation.
Clearly, complying with the government's mandate motivates more primary care physicians to adopt EHRs in their practices than other, more fundamental healthcare motivations.
-----

Oregon Health Network's 12 HIT best practices, part 4: Implementation

By Greg Fraser, CMIO, WVP Health Authority
Created 2012-04-09 09:49
Implementation – answering the question of “how” – is #4 on the list of Health Information Technology Best Practice Areas. Having been involved with electronic health record implementation in the ambulatory environment for six years, I can validate some universal truths about implementation and what it takes for a health care organization to successfully navigate its way from a paper to electronic environment. Why do some organizations succeed while others fail? Why do some successful organizations struggle much more than others?
The Buddhist aphorism applies: “Pain is inevitable; suffering is optional.”
-----

Telemedicine becoming the new house call

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
6:57 p.m. Monday, April 9, 2012
Travis Proctor logged onto his computer, turned on his new webcam and clicked his mouse.
Within seconds, the 42-year-old father of three was face to face with Dr. Kelvin Burton, his primary care physician.
Just months ago, Proctor would have had to drive for nearly an hour round-trip from his home in Powder Springs to Burton’s Douglasville family care practice just for a checkup.
Not anymore.
-----

ICD-10 Would be Delayed One Year Under HHS Proposal

Andrea Kraynak, for HealthLeaders Media , April 9, 2012

HHS released a proposed rule Monday announcing a one-year delay of the implementation of ICD-10-CM/PCS. If finalized, ICD-10 would become effective October 1, 2014.
"Many provider groups have expressed serious concerns about their ability to meet the Oct. 1, 2013, compliance date. The proposed change in the compliance date for ICD-10 would give providers and other covered entities more time to prepare and fully test their systems to ensure a smooth and coordinated transition to these new code sets," according to an April 9 press release.
"This is what I expected," says Shannon McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CEMC, CPC-I, CCDS, director of HIM and coding at HCPro, Inc., in Danvers, Mass. "But I am happy to hear that they didn’t seem to consider bypassing ICD-10 and going right to ICD-11. This goes to show that they do see the value in the system."
-----

Patients Take Back Control with Technology

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , April 10, 2012

Technology can be a wonderful thing. It can also be a cold and dehumanizing thing.
Unfortunately, in medicine, that often happens with one and the same device.
The very instruments that diagnose and treat us can often make us feel more like test subjects than patients receiving care. Anyone who's ever had an MRI knows the device that can find what's ailing us is also oppressively big and noisy. Woe to you if you're claustrophobic.
But technology is now being applied in the interests of healing the entire patient—mind, body, and soul.
-----

7 types of security features for your tablet

By Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
Created 04/06/2012
With the release of the "new" iPad, an increased focus has been placed on how to protect sensitive information. And although there are a myriad of basic ways to safeguard your device, certain security features have become necessary to take tablet protection one step further.
"Clearly, healthcare is a vertical that is more concerned, or needs to be more concerned, about security, more so than any other vertical because of the personal info they're dealing with," said John Bischof, executive director of sales operations for Lenovo Americas. 
-----

CMS Posts Details on Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures

APR 9, 2012 11:42am ET
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has posted on its Web site the complete set of clinical quality measures in the proposed rule for Stage 2 electronic records meaningful use starting in 2014.
-----

States wrestle with prescription data to curb abuse

By gshaw
Created Apr 9 2012 - 12:58pm
Access to drug prescription databases could curb abuse of pain pills, says a Colorado payer--but the state's pharmacy board is having none of it.
Rocky Mountain Health Plans, along with Colorado Medicaid officials, sought access to the database in order to curb doctor-shopping and pharmacy hopping, according to [1] the Denver Post.
But board members said state law allows access only to those providing direct care or dispensing direct prescriptions, and told both organizations they could not conduct wider reviews, according to the paper.
-----

Adaptive clinical decision support improves patient risk estimation

By danb
Created Apr 9 2012 - 1:34pm
Clinical decision support could become more personalized, if the results of a study [1] recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are any indication. Researchers determined that a new data-driven and adaptive approach to CDS was found to be more reliable than some existing methods.
The new approach--dubbed ADAPT--does not use training data, and instead relies on confidence intervals (CIs) drawn from individuals. Each model uses different features, parameters and samples, according to the study's authors.
-----

Health privacy issues can be resolved without obstructing care

By kterry
Created Apr 9 2012 - 7:10am
At times, it seems like concerns about the security and privacy of healthcare data have catapulted into overdrive: For instance, it recently was predicted that healthcare spending on security would hit $70 billion a year [1] by 2015--enough to cover the majority of the uninsured. Sure, there are plenty of security breaches--some of them serious enough to attract public attention. But as a few recent cases show [2], universal encryption of data (some forms of which may soon be required under the latest HIPAA rules [3]) could eliminate the biggest source of security breaches. Also, with the advent of virtual desktop infrastructure, there's no reason to store any personal health information on end-user devices.
As for hacking, the Eastern European thieves who are suspected of hacking into Utah's Medicaid system [4] recently were not after the details of Aunt Tilly's hip operation; they wanted her Social Security number. The only cure for that--regardless of how much is spent on security--is to replace the "social" with a national patient identifier. Unfortunately, that's still the impossible dream [5], ironically because of privacy concerns.
-----

Time To Rethink EMR Design And User Interface

04/06/2012 By Dale Sanders
Dale Sanders, Senior VP, Healthcare Quality Catalyst
There’s a great new article in the March 2012 issue of The American Journal for Managed Care, “IT-Enabled Systems Engineering Approach to Monitoring and Reducing ADEs.” You can find it here. The point I’m trying to make in this blog, by drawing attention to this article, is this: it’s time for EMR vendors to rethink the fundamental design and user interface of their products.
They’ve been basically unchanged for 10 years at least, supporting the same concept of encounter-based care that itself goes back at least 50 years. EMR vendors need to stop thinking of patient care as short-term encounters with a clinician and start thinking of patient care as long-term project management with a team of care providers. EMR user interfaces need to look more like a project management tool that enables social collaboration, task assignment and follow-up, and the collective wisdom of the care team, including the patient’s wisdom, more effectively.
-----
Monday, April 09, 2012

Moving Federal Health Care Targets Becoming a Way of Life

Moving targets are a challenge in skeet shooting; for health care providers, they are becoming a way of life.
Health care organizations are facing a variety of looming federal deadlines, ranging from implementing electronic health records to adopting new transaction standards. These deadlines -- carefully tracked by health care organizations and professional associations such as the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives -- are intended to put pressure on the industry to stay the course.
But recently some federal deadlines have been pushed back in response to evidence that the industry as a whole is not ready to meet them. For example, the Oct. 1, 2013, deadline for use of ICD-10 codes was postponed in February, and most recently, the deadline for enforcing use of ASC X12 Version 5010 and NCPDP Version D.0 was pushed back for a second time, to June 30, 2012.
These reprieves draw sighs of relief from some industry segments, while evoking frustration from others that have invested time, money and staff to meet the original deadline.
-----

Gingrich Health IT Think Tank Goes Bankrupt

Center for Health Transformation played major role in promoting health IT to Congress and the healthcare industry.
By Ken Terry,  InformationWeek
April 09, 2012
The Gingrich Group, which includes Newt Gingrich's think tank, the Center for Health Transformation (CHT), has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Gingrich severed ties with CHT when he began seeking the Republican presidential nomination in May 2011, and a Gingrich campaign spokesman told the Wall Street Journal that CHT's bankruptcy is a result of its founder's departure.
CHT was a major promoter of health IT both before and after the passage of the HITECH Act, part of the 2009 stimulus law that established the government incentive program for "meaningful use" of electronic health records. AdTech Ad
Back in 2007, when Allscripts and several other technology companies formed the National e-Prescribing Patient Safety Initiative (NEPSI), which offered free e-prescribing software to physicians, Gingrich appeared at the press conference. "In the 21st century, the legibility of a doctor's handwriting should not determine whether a patient lives or dies," said the former Speaker of the House of Representatives in urging widespread adoption of e-prescribing. Later, Gingrich wrote the introduction to a book on the topic entitled Paper Kills, which was edited by CHT project director David Merritt and published by CHT press.
-----

Kenya's Startup Boom

Local programmers and homegrown business models are helping to realize the vast promise of using phones to improve health care and save lives.
Erick Njenga, a 21-year-old college senior wrapping up his business IT degree at Nairobi's Strathmore University, has a gap-toothed grin and a scraggly goatee. A mild-mannered son of auditors, he didn't say much as we tucked into a lunch of grilled steak, rice, and fruit juice at an outdoor café amid the din of the city's awful traffic. But his code had done the talking. Last year Njenga and three classmates developed a program that will let thousands of Kenyan health workers use mobile phones to report and track the spread of diseases in real time—and they'd done it for a tiny fraction of what the government had been on the verge of paying for such an application. Their success—and that of others in the nation's fast-growing startup scene—demonstrates the emergence of a tech-savvy generation able to address Kenya's public-health problems in ways that donors, nongovernmental organizations, and multinational companies alone cannot.
-----

Information Integrity: A High Risk, High Cost Vulnerability

APR 1, 2012
Accuracy and validity of data are persistent concerns for those who use it and are the subject of that data. And the concerns are well founded. Data error is a risk to patient safety.
Distrust of data can stop or delay action on a performance improvement agenda and it's very difficult to overcome that distrust. Tracing and correcting errors is costly and often imperfect. The amount of operational inefficiencies due to data quality issues, such as untangling an error in patient identification, is legend.
In short, problems in data accuracy and validity can impair the value of the information that health care is investing so much to digitize.
The Data Warehousing Institute estimates that poor data quality costs U.S. businesses $600 billion a year. There's no estimate of the cost of data quality problems in health care-but even the most conservative guesses for quality problems in the nation's largest industry would indicate there's real money at stake here.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Data Mining and Big Data Are Combining with Some Interesting Outcomes.

We had two interesting and related reports appear recently.
First we have:

Start-ups want to help hospitals harness big data

By gshaw
Created Mar 13 2012 - 12:12pm
As the healthcare industry wakes up and smells the potential of big data, hospitals are experimenting with ways to harness it--and two new start-ups want to help them do so.
Charité University of Medicine Berlin, Europe's largest university hospital, is using increasingly large stores of complex information not only to improve quality and aid clinicians and researchers but also helps improve senior management processes, according to a case study [1] in Forbes magazine.
Deputy CIO Martin Peuker told Forbes that more than 700 hospital employees have access to a central data warehouse that holds both financial and operational information. Every senior manager has ready access to data about operations, scheduling, patient care, and patient records. The entire repository of information stored by the hospital exceeds 1.6 petabytes.
A McKinsey Global Institute report released last year said that effective and creative use of big data could create more than $300 billion in value for the U.S. health system every year. Two-thirds of that would be in the form of reducing US healthcare expenditure by about 8 percent, according to the report [2].
All that big data potential has inspired Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center to create a new startup, QI Healthcare, according to MedCity News article [3].
QI Healthcare's first product is called Surgical Outcomes Collection System (SOCS). The application aggregates data from various hospital systems, including electronic medical records, to enable "institution-wide analyses of cases to identify opportunities to improve patient care," according to a QI statement [4].
"The real power of this software is in the ability to analyze every significant patient case," Frederick Ryckman, professor of surgery and senior vice president for medical operations at Cincinnati Children's, said. "Before SOCS we spent countless hours manually gathering data. SOCS improves the process through automation and enhanced analytics--and it frees up clinical resources to focus on quality improvement."
.....
To learn more:
- read the Forbes magazine
case study [1]
- see the McKinsey
report [2] on the potential of big data
- see the MedCity News articles on
QI Healthcare [3] and Health Care DataWorks [5]
- read the QI Healthcare
announcement [4]
- read the PC Magazine
article [6] on the problems with big data
- get more info on Chopra's
talk [8] at GigaOM
And second we have this work reported in Nature:

Drug data reveal sneaky side effects

Mining of surveillance data highlights thousands of previously unknown consequences when drugs are taken together.
14 March 2012
An algorithm designed by US scientists to trawl through a plethora of drug interactions has yielded thousands of previously unknown side effects caused by taking drugs in combination.
The work, published today in Science Translational Medicine1, provides a way to sort through the hundreds of thousands of 'adverse events' reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) each year. “It’s a step in the direction of a complete catalogue of drug–drug interactions,” says the study's lead author, Russ Altman, a bioengineer at Stanford University in California.
Although clinical trials are often designed to assess the safety of a drug in addition to how well it works, the size of the trials needed to detect the full range of drug interactions would surpass even the large, late-stage clinical trials sometimes required for drug approval. Furthermore, clinical trials are often done in controlled settings, using carefully defined criteria to determine which patients are eligible for enrolment — including other conditions they might have and which medicines they can take alongside the trial drug.
Once a drug hits the market, however, things can get messy as unknown side-effects pop up. And that’s where Altman’s algorithm comes in.
“Even if you show a drug is safe in a clinical trial, that doesn’t mean it’s going to be safe in the real world,” says Paul Watkins, director of the Hamner–University of North Carolina Institute for Drug Safety Sciences in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, who was not involved in the work. “This approach is addressing a better way to rapidly assess a drug’s safety in the real world once it is approved.”
Lots more detail here:
It looks to me that these two trends are gaining some real momentum and that their use can only grow. Well worth following the links to see the variety of things that are now being done.
David.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Now It Is Clear Just Why We Are Seeing The E-Health Policy Nonsense That Is Happening At Present.

This very interesting report appeared a day or so ago.

Public servants' online muzzle

  • by: Natasha Bita, Consumer editor
  • From: The Australian
  • April 18, 2012 12:00AM
PUBLIC servants have been gagged from criticising Gillard government policies on blogs, Facebook and Twitter -- even if they use an alias.
The Australian Public Service Commission has warned bureaucrats they risk the sack if they post "inappropriate" comments on social media.
"APS employees must still uphold the APS values and code of conduct even when material is posted anonymously or using an alias or pseudonym," it states in a new circular.
"Employees should not rely on a site's security settings for a guarantee of privacy, as material posted in a relatively secure setting can still be copied and reproduced elsewhere.
"As a rule of thumb, irrespective of the forum, anyone who posts material online should make an assumption that at some point their identity and the nature of their employment will be revealed."
Commonwealth Public Sector Union national secretary Nadine Flood said yesterday the muzzling of public servants was "excessive", and might be overturned in an industrial tribunal.
The new edict would ban bureaucrats from commenting in a private capacity on issues of public interest, such as the carbon tax or asylum policy, she said.
"Any citizen should be able to participate in social media and express their personal views without risk to their employment," Ms Flood said.
More here:
Well this really does explain a lot.
It explains just why so many Anonymous contributors comment on the blog and why the comments often seem to be so well informed.
It explains why a policy as conceptually stupid as the present design of the NEHRS is still, seemingly, being fully supported by DoHA despite the fact so many within DoHA know just how big a ‘dog’ they are stuck with and the mess that is going to be left after the whole thing is quietly shelved.
It explains why there is no properly informed debate in the public domain on the NEHRS initiative.
The terror which the Government feels in the face of well-informed criticism is pretty clear from the spin applied to various e-Health events. I almost choked on those infamous Wheaties when I discovered the Stakeholder Forum held by NEHTA last week had the amazing sobriquet of “NEHTA Stakeholder “Super Summit”  - “Rallying the eHealth Champions””. What an inspiring event that must have been for all the brainwashed converted.
That this spinning has been going on for ages becomes clear when you read here:
It is very sad that what should be a really non-controversial e-Health strategy gets corrupted and distorted by a combination of lack of public discussion and review - remember how the initial release of the National E-Health Strategy was just a summary rather than the details - and spin.
The reasons why are just a little bit clearer.
David.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

It Looks Like The Medical Software Industry Association Has Put NEHTA on the Back Foot.

The following page turned up on the NEHTA web site a few days ago.

Clinical Safety

The national eHealth system will improve clinical outcomes, and to do that it needs clinically safe and efficient foundations. That’s why the clinical safety and integrity of NEHTA’s products guides everything NEHTA does as an organisation.
There are three key clinical quality and safety processes in NEHTA, the Clinical Safety Unit; the Clinical Safety Working Group and the Clinical Governance Review Board, each ensuring safety.
  • The Clinical Safety Unit comprises clinicians with specialist training and experience in eHealth and risk management as well as system safety.
  • The Clinical Safety Working Group works with the clinical and programme leadership for the PCEHR and for products and solutions constituting the component infrastructure of the PCEHR. Their work is to validate the evidence that forms the ‘Clinical Safety Case’ for the PCEHR. This includes identifying risks, recommending the controls to address the potential risks and evidencing these in operation.
  • The Clinical Governance Review Board has an advisory role to support existing NEHTA product development and implementation and provides expert and systemic clinical and safety advice.
NEHTA works with organisations such as the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) and the University of New South Wales Centre for Health Informatics to ensure the clinical safety and governance of the PCEHR and eHealth products.
See here:
It is interesting that this little addition to the e-Health Implementation Section of the web site comes when so little has been updated in the last year and in many cases since 2010!
I reckon all this is a delayed response to the critique of NEHTA at the public hearings at the Senate PCEHR Enquiry in February by the MSIA among some others.
What amazes me is that we still have not seen this amazingly secret PCEHR Clinical Safety Case. Where is it and why is it not public? Blowed if I know other than the most likely reason that is doesn’t yet exist.
Clinical Safety in Health IT is not just a phrase. What it requires is that systems are actually formally tested in very complex ways - on paper through process control and review during development and then by careful evaluation of staged limited implementations of proposed systems before extensive roll out.
Safety in clinical systems is also multifactorial involving user training, system functionality and controls, system and interface design and a whole lot more.
If you want to find coverage of the variety of ways things can go wrong there are two useful resources.
This blog from last year points to an Institute of Medicine Report and some issues that flowed.
See here:
Second is Scot Silverstein’s blog where many of these issues are raised among some other topics.
NEHTA claims it understands but until we see the actual details of the work they have done that is just so much ‘hot air’. This is confirmed when we have their clinical lead suggest a good deal more work and transparency is needed.
I cannot but agree. The treating the health community and public like mushrooms (kept in the dark and fed excrement)  is just obscene and really needs to be condemned.
David.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

NEHTA Gets Carried Away With Spin And Looses It Utterly It Seems. They Are In Fantasy Mode On What They Have Achieved.

A day or so ago NEHTA published a February 10 dated submission on the Australian Safety and Quality Goals For Healthcare.
The consultation period is now closed. Here is the request for submissions. Apparently a report went to Health Ministers in late March, 2012

Australian Safety and Quality Goals for Health Care

Consultation period has commenced

The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has prepared a draft set of Australian Safety and Quality Goals for Health Care and is currently seeking comment on these via a consultation discussion paper.
The purpose of the Australian Safety and Quality Goals for Health Care is to describe high priority areas that should be the basis of coordinated national action to improve the safety and quality of care and achieve better outcomes for patients and a more effective and efficient health system.
You are invited to make a submission on one, or all, of the draft Goals, or any other aspect of the consultation paper.
A copy of the consultation paper is available to download here. (PDF 275 KB)
Submissions, marked ‘Australian Safety and Quality Goals for Health Care’, can be made by post or email, or by using an online survey.
Post: GPO Box 5480, Sydney NSW 2001
Email: goals@safetyandquality.gov.au
All submissions should be received by close of business on Friday 10 February 2012 to be considered in the consultation process.
All submissions will be published on the Commission’s website, including the names and/or organisations making the submission. The Commission will consider requests to withhold part or all of the contents of any submission made.
Copies of this paper can be obtained from the Australian Commission on Safety and Health Care. Contact details are:
Phone: (02) 9126 3600
Here is the link to the page and further information.
More information on the broader initiatives is here:
The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) is a government agency which was established by the Commonwealth, with the support of State and Territory governments.
We lead and coordinate national improvements in safety and quality in health care across Australia.
Here is the link:
I thought the NEHTA submission might make for some interesting reading.
You can find it here:
Sadly I have to say what I found was what could be safely described as a ‘puff piece’.
On page 1 we read:
“The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) System is the next step in using eHealth to enhance the healthcare system. The PCEHR System enables the secure sharing of health information between an individual’s healthcare providers, while enabling the individual to access their own health information held in their PCEHR and control who else can access it.
The PCEHR will build on the range of eHealth products and services already developed by NEHTA, including the Healthcare Identifier Service, Secure Messaging, the National Authentication Service for Health (NASH), eReferrals, ePrescriptions, specialist letters and discharge summaries.”
I am sure it will come as a surprise to many to know NEHTA has all these products and services out there. They have written a few documents and have had Medicare put in place an IHI service which is still awaiting significant use after almost 2 years. The rest is just hopeful spin as far as I can tell.
On Page 2 we read:
“NEHTA is charged with delivering the Australian Government’s eHealth solutions that will underpin the secure electronic exchange of relevant clinical information across the health sector. The agenda for eHealth is moving beyond a singular focus on the delivery of information communications technology (ICT) solutions to focus on ensuring the safe, effective use of these tools in the real world of healthcare.”
One asks just solution NEHTA has delivered? I can’t see much as yet after almost six years.
If anything is being delivered it is by Accenture and its partners and the local health software industry. How long is it since we knew NASH was needed?
Page 3 contains even more fun:
“For Australians who choose to have one, the information in a PCEHR will be able to be accessed by themselves, their selected carers, and their authorised healthcare providers. With this information available to them, healthcare providers and consumers themselves will be able to make better decisions about the consumer’s health and treatment. Consumers will also be able to contribute their own information and add to the recorded information stored in their individual PCEHR via Consumer Entered Notes.
The PCEHR is not a duplicate or replacement for local clinical records; it will complement local records by allowing access to key information from other providers. As the PCEHR becomes more widely available consumers will be able to access their own health information anytime they need it, from anywhere in Australia and overseas where connection to the internet is possible.
Based on an in-depth review of international eHealth studies, shared electronic health records , such as the PCEHR have the potential to contribute to improvements in healthcare quality and safety through enhanced access to and use of best practice guidelines, reducing errors (e.g. medication prescribing errors) and enhanced public health planning outcomes. They can also generate efficiencies by reducing duplication of effort, facilitating timely access of information to chosen providers and generating wider indirect effects e.g. timely discharge results in better information to the General Practitioner (GP) resulting in less repeated admission to hospital. Together, these have the potential to result in a healthier population, reduced demand on both primary and acute care, and saved lives.”
I really wonder just where the evidence is for all that. Not in this document and given the architecture of the NEHRS is unique in the world as far as I know they are just making it up!
On page 8 we read the following:
“Strong clinical leadership in the development of the PCEHR and on-the-ground support throughout its implementation will ground this reality of personal control in better and patient centred health delivery.
NEHTA's Stakeholder Reference Groups comprise a range of organisations representative of Australia’s healthcare sector. These organisations join jurisdictional representatives to provide their input to NEHTA’s work program and importantly provide information back to their members.”
This is really just not true. The PCEHR concept was dreamed up by some IT people in NEHTA / DoHA and just dropped on the unsuspecting clinicians. It is the worst of all possible shared record types as far as clinician needs are concerned.
We also read the following:
“Potential enhancements to the PCEHR
The PCEHR will be available for registration from 1 July 2012. However, provider capability and uptake will develop over time, as evidenced in other local and international eHealth implementation projects of this nature. The National E-Health Strategy proposed that the PCEHR System rollout be undertaken via an incremental approach, with the capabilities of the system being expanded over a four-year implementation period.”
Given the National E-Health Strategy is a 2008 document that framed a totally different implementation approach this statement is just insulting to the authors of that strategy. It has been funded and ignored and now 4 years later suddenly another 4 years is needed.
This document is spin city gone mad. The benefits are grossly overplayed, adoption is not really encouraged and the one system for the docs and one for the patients is just rubbish no matter how you look at it. Worse still this mad intervention has sucked the life out of some practical, sensible initiatives which were underway.
Pretty sad.
David.