Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 25th August, 2013.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

ONC chief's 10 pithy quotes on health IT

Posted on Aug 16, 2013
By Jeff Rowe, Contributing Writer
Since the introduction of LexisNexis, it’s been an open question in the mind of many prominent policymakers whether they’ll be remembered for their substantive accomplishments, or for the number and variety of soundbites they managed to feed to the ever-hungry media.
Few would suggest that Farzad Mostashari, MD, the soon-departing director of ONC, doesn’t have more than his share of very real milestones marking his tenure. And he’s also had a knack for pitching his ideas in ways that are succinct, sticky (in that they stick in one’s memory), and often entertaining.
What follows, then, with no thought toward their level of memorable-ness, are 10 highlights from Mostashari’s time at the helm of ONC.
-----

Varying stakeholder value assessments impact health IT adoption

August 16, 2013 | By Susan D. Hall
Innovations might be slow to spread in healthcare because of various stakeholders' differing views of their value, according to a study published this week in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.
Decision makers assess an innovation's costs and benefits--including improvement in efficiency, health gains, satisfaction with the care process, and investments required--the researchers from The Netherlands noted. Different groups perceive those differently.
-----

Physicians: EHR costs outweigh benefits

August 16, 2013 | By Ashley Gold
Electronic health record provider athenahealth's recently published Physician Sentiment Index report finds that although most physicians believe EHRs can improve outcomes, more than half also say that the cost of such tools outweighs their benefit.
The Watertown, Mass.-based vendor polled 1,200 physicians: 70 percent specialists, 47 percent independent practitioners and 30 percent primary-care doctors.
While most respondents said they liked EHRs (38 percent reported a "somewhat favorable" opinion, while 31 percent had a "very favorable" opinion), 51 percent of respondents said the financial benefits of EHRs do not outweigh the cost. The report points out that independent physicians are more likely to feel this way than employed physicians.
-----

Rothman Index uses EHR to identify health risks, unplanned readmissions

  • August 15, 2013
Researchers evaluated the Rothman Index, a calculator that uses information from electronic health records to identify health risks, and concluded it can be successfully used to predict the likelihood of unplanned hospital readmissions, according to recent research published in Medical Care.
 “We know the Rothman Index is associated with readmissions, but we do not know if it can be used to improve decision making at the bedside in terms of when patients are discharged,” Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD, from the Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Conn., stated in a press release. “We also don’t know if physicians would benefit from using it as part of determining what kinds of added supports at home and in the community might be arranged at discharge. Answering these questions will determine if the Rothman Index can be used prospectively by clinicians to reduce readmissions and adverse events post-hospitalization.”
-----

What can predictive analytics do for healthcare reform?

Author Name Kyle Murphy, PhD   |   Date August 13, 2013  
The shift from pay-for-service to pay-for-performance in healthcare means that healthcare organizations and providers must approach care delivery in a different way, moving from diagnostic care to preventive medicine. Part of the challenge of adopting a forward-looking approach is having the right tools, namely health IT systems with the ability to predict what’s next.
“Analytics traditionally stops at the present time, and we’re now applying this to the future so that you can add predictive analytics,” says Simon Arkell, CEO of Predixion Software, a developer of predictive analytics solutions for healthcare. “Although they sound the same, they’re different ways of approaching problems. It’s great to have a dashboard with insight on what’s happening or has happened, but unless you’re projecting what’s going to happen and then recommending the right steps to take advantage of that new knowledge, then you’re leaving money on the table.”
One area of healthcare already showing promise involves avoiding unnecessary or preventable readmissions. “The readmission problem is a big one and that’s one of the areas we focus on. It’s a very expensive problem,” observes Arkell.
-----

Hospital IT execs: Why med reconciliation via EHR is a challenge

August 15, 2013 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
With heavy pressure to reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes, hospitals increasingly are relying on the medication reconciliation technology in their electronic health record systems to administer the right medication to the right patient at the right time, and to coordinate new drugs with those that a patient may already be taking.
"Electronic health records help enhance the accuracy of the process by providing tools to accurately capture the patient's previous medication history, better manage the process of ordering new medications or discontinuing previous ones, and generate instructions for the patients," Ferdinand Velasco, M.D. (right), chief medical information officer of Texas Health Resources, a 25-hospital health system in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, told FierceEMR.
But the use of the technology is still evolving, and the process is proving to be a challenge.
FierceEMR spoke exclusively with several hospital IT executives regarding their efforts to use EHRs to conduct medication reconciliation.
-----

EHRs, tech help docs avert misdiagnosis

Posted on Aug 15, 2013
By Paul Cerrato, Contributing Writer
The statistics are disturbing: between 10 percent and 15 percent of medical diagnoses are incorrect and those diagnostic errors have a high price tag. To combat potential patient harm and reduce the costs from misdiagnosis, hospitals and medical practices are turning to clinical decision support tools.
A recent analysis published in BMJ Quality and Safety examined malpractice claims over 25 years, identifying more than 100,000 cases that involved diagnostic error, with an average price of $386,849 per claim. An earlier study published in the same journal estimated that diagnostic errors account for 40,000 to 80,000 hospital deaths yearly in the U.S.
Healthcare experts and vendors are trying to address this national problem in a variety of ways.  The widespread adoption of EHRs will likely help reduce the deaths and injuries that can result from misdiagnosis because many are now equipped with clinical decision support (CDS) software to help physicians pinpoint the correct diagnosis.
-----

Federal study shows IT improves outcomes

Posted on Aug 15, 2013
By Diana Manos, Senior Editor
A new report issued Thursday by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has found that certain health IT products, including those that provide decision support, clinical workflow support and care coordination can lead to better healthcare outcomes. 
"Findings and Lessons from the Improving Quality Through Clinician Use of Health IT Grant Initiative" documents the findings of more than 20 research projects that investigated how health IT applications can assist providers in providing evidence-based care. Multiple studies showed positive impacts on process and intermediate outcomes.
The report highlights key findings and lessons from the experiences of 24 projects awarded in 2007 under AHRQ. According to AHRQ officials, the initiative was designed to investigate approaches for using health IT to support clinicians in making patient care decisions and coordinating care with a focus on effectively incorporating evidence-based information at the point of care. It's part of AHRQ’s Ambulatory Safety and Quality program, which was designed to improve the safety and quality of ambulatory healthcare in the U.S.
-----

FDA releases final guidance on wireless medical devices

August 15, 2013 | By Greg Slabodkin
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has published final guidance to assist industry and FDA staff in identifying and appropriately addressing specific considerations related to the incorporation and integration of radio frequency (RF) wireless technology in medical devices.
"With the increasing use of RF wireless medical devices, continuing innovation and advancements in wireless technology, and an increasingly crowded RF environment, RF wireless technology considerations should be taken into account to help provide for the safe and effective use of these medical devices," states the FDA document. "This guidance highlights and discusses RF wireless technology considerations that can have an effect on the safe and effective use of medical devices."
-----

Scots deploy Key Information Summary

15 August 2013   Rebecca Todd
More than 60% of Scottish GP practices are live with the new Key Information Summary for patients with complex care needs.
Nearly 20,000 KIS records have already been created and the full roll-out is expected to be complete in three weeks.
KIS programme manager Jonathan Cameron said all the country’s Emis practices are live with the new service and around one third of INPS practices.
The KIS is an extension of Scotland’s Emergency Care Summary.
-----

47% Of Doctors Use Smartphone, Tablet And PC

More clinicians than ever are "digital omnivores," using smartphones, tablets, and computers for clinical work, survey says.
Clinicians are rapidly increasing their use of mobile devices at work, according to a new report from Epocrates, a vendor of mobile reference materials that is owned by EHR vendor Athenahealth.
Of the 1,063 physicians and mid-level practitioners who responded to Epocrates' survey, 86% of the clinicians now use smartphones in their professional activities, up from 78% in 2012. In addition, 53% use tablets at work, compared to 34% last year. All of the respondents use desktop/laptop computers. And nearly half fall into a new category that Epocrates dubs "digital omnivores," who use all three platforms, or "screens." The percentage of digital omnivores has increased to 47% from 28% in 2012, and the report predicts that this group will shoot up to 82% of the total next year, largely because of the skyrocketing use of tablets among clinicians.
Tablet adoption already accounts for the bulk of the increase in mobile device use. Nearly two years ago, 80% of physicians reported using mobile devices at work -- but back then, most of them were using only smartphones. Last year, Manhattan Research found that 62% of doctors were using tablets for professional purposes. The lower number in the Epocrates survey may be related to differences in study samples.
-----

Data Capture: Devil in the Details Confronting All Meaningful Users in 2014

by Robin Raiford and Anantachai (Tony) Panjamapirom Thursday, August 15, 2013
To meet many of the meaningful use requirements, providers must capture, store and share clinical data mostly in a specified electronic, structured and coded format. Having undergone a major ramp-up data capture in Stage 1, providers will continue to experience the increased pressure and intensity in both quantity and quality of required data elements. Providers should view this mandate, as an opportunity to transform their data collection process and develop plans to sustain providers' agility needed to successfully demonstrate meaningful use as the future stages will only bring additional data elements and more complex requirements.
-----

4 ways IT can keep medications straight

Posted on Aug 14, 2013
By Jeff Rowe, Contributing Writer
On one level, taking a pill is one of the simplest forms of healthcare, and it's safe to say that across the country people pop pills by the millions every day.
At the same time, medication errors are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of patients annually, and the odds are many other patients end up taking the wrong medicine with more minor consequences.
It was an error of that sort which led to the creation of MedSnap, a Birmingham, Ala.-based company that is focused on using IT to improve medication safety. According to MedSnap's co-founder and CEO, Patrick Hymel, MD, about two-and-a-half years ago his grandfather was taking the wrong medicine to treat his prostate cancer – and it was six weeks before the error was discovered.
-----

Royal Berks spends £16m on consultants

1 August 2013   Rebecca Todd
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust has spent £16.6m on external consultants working on its Cerner Millennium implementation.
A Freedom of Information Act request made by BBC Berkshire asked how much the trust has spent on external consultants to help manage the electronic patient record project.
The response was a staggering £16.6m spent employing 213 external consultants since the inception of the programme.
-----

Google Glass: Promising but risky for providers

August 14, 2013 | By Ashley Gold
While Google Glass in the eyes of some healthcare professionals holds promise as an innovative and effective tool in the operating room, to others, its privacy disaster potential looms large.
An article in the Wall Street Journal highlights the experience of cardiothoracic surgeon Pierre Theodore, M.D. with Google Glass. Theodore found he could alternate between looking down at his patient and glancing at the patient's medical imagery on the lens--similar to how a driver can look at the road and the rearview mirror.
"I had thought it was going to be a gimmick, but after that I became a zealot," Theodore, who works at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, told WSJ. Last week at Rock Health's Health Innovation Summit in San Francisco, Theodore told participants that doctors aren't slow to adopt Glass because they're stubborn, but rather, because they're already inundated with technology--monitors, wires, screens, etc.--according to WSJ.
-----

Algorithm could sort out the most pressing individual health recommendations

August 14, 2013 | By Susan D. Hall
Primary care physicians soon may be able to use a mathematical algorithm to help them quickly prioritize their recommendations for individual patients.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has issued recommendations for 60 distinct clinical services, but physicians tend to focus on the ones that take the least time. Those aren't necessarily the most important ones for improving a patient's health, according to an article at amednews.com.
In a study published at the Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers used the algorithm, connected to EHRs, to sort out the recommendations most closely tied to life expectancy based on a particular patient's condition.
-----

6 steps to health information superiority

By Jeffrey Edgell, Chief technologist at DHA Group
IT enterprises must respond rapidly to queries and be in a position to take action based on data and information that are accurate, understandable and timely. This demand extends to all areas of professional and personal use including the health environment.
Consider the instance of the acute patient in need of treatment outside of her provider network whose medical history is contained in numerous disparate systems. Think, too, of the consumer simply trying to make a decision on buying a healthcare product online and making comparisons. In both examples, the end user requires actionable, comprehensible, correct and current information. A failure in any area may ultimately result in poor decision making, possibly with life-or-death ramifications.
Users must have the capability to request data from any system that houses needed information — even if stored in formats that the host system never anticipated — and receive them in a manner that integrates properly with that host system. Historically, a user in either scenario described above would be challenged to determine where the required data were stored and how to access, translate and integrate them with other data being collected.
But as Albert Einstein so aptly put it, in today’s world one must “know where to find information and how to use it – that’s the secret of success.”
-----

Kaiser Permanente Automates Quality Reporting To Joint Commission

Converting nearly half of core measures to e-measures saves time, but there are limits to what EHRs can do, cautions study.
Researchers at Kaiser Permanente have shown that it's possible to automate partially or fully the collection of data from an EHR for public quality reporting. They've also proved that this automation saves money, compared to manual data abstraction. However, their paper in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) cautions that their experience "illustrates the gap between the current and desired states of automated quality reporting."
In 2010, Kaiser Permanente's care reporting staff began to retool the Joint Commission core measures for automated quality reporting. The purpose of this program was to make reporting by Kaiser's 37 hospitals more efficient and more reliable, said Terhilda Garrido, Kaiser's VP for health IT transformation and analytics, and the paper's lead author, in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare.
Kaiser had previously developed e-measures from scratch for quality improvement purposes but had never before tried to adapt existing quality measures to the EHR. The first batch of metrics it automated were 21 measures from six of the 13 core measure sets, including those for acute myocardial infarction, ED patient flow, immunizations, the surgical care improvement project (SCIP), pneumonia and VTE prophylaxis.
-----

Hospital HIE grows more on some branches than others

By Anthony Brino, Associate Editor
Although more than half of hospitals were sharing information with providers outside of their organizational affiliations as of 2012, only some were exchanging clinical care summaries and medication lists, according to a study by researchers at the Office of the National Coordinator.
Hospitals’ health information exchange, either through EMR interoperability and health information organizations, has increased 41 percent since 2008, and sharing of all types of clinical information increased between 39 percent and 55 percent, the ONC’s director of economic analysis and modeling, Michael Furukawa, and colleagues reported in Health Affairs.
More than half of hospitals were exchanging radiology and laboratory reports, too, Furukawa and colleagues found. But only only about one-third of the hospitals were exchanging clinical care summaries and medication lists, the study found — a slow adoption of information that’s prioritized in health reform care coordination policies.
-----

Hospitals: Big data use is a 'significant challenge'

August 13, 2013 | By Dan Bowman
While most hospitals and healthcare organization representatives responding to a recent survey from the eHealth Initiative and the College of Health Information Management Executives see big data as important to their strategic plans, far fewer believe their facilities are implementing it appropriately.
Of 102 respondents, close to 80 percent said that use of big data and predictive analytics was important; 84 percent, however, called the actual application of such tools "a significant challenge." What's more, only 45 percent called their organization's big data strategy "flexible and scalable."
The results are similar to those of a survey conducted in June by healthsystemCIO.com in which 52 percent of responding hospital CIOs said that while they were using big data tools for some analytics projects, they weren't doing so at a "sophisticated level." Sixty-six percent cited lack of manpower or skills as primary reasons for not taking advantage of big data analytical tools at a higher level.
-----

Telemedicine Consultations Improve Pediatric Care in Rural ERs, Study Finds

August 12, 2013
The quality of care for pediatric patients in rural emergency rooms—where pediatricians and pediatric specialists are scarce—improved significantly when delivered via telemedicine consultations, according to a study by researchers at the 129-bed UC Davis Children’s Hospital.
The use of technology to link far-distant practitioners has been steadily increasing in American medicine, particularly as a tool to provide rural and underserved communities with access to specialty physicians. More recently, telemedicine has been used for consultations to emergency rooms, and is particularly recommended for use in the area of stroke care.
The study, which was published in the journal Critical Care Medicine, also found that rural emergency room physicians are more likely to adjust their pediatric patients’ diagnoses and course of treatment after a live, interactive videoconference with a specialist. Parents’ satisfaction and perception of the quality of their child’s care also are significantly improved when consultations are provided using telemedicine, rather than telephone, and aid emergency room treatment, the study found.
-----

Federally Developed CONNECT HIE Software Gets an Upgrade

AUG 12, 2013 3:01pm ET
The Federal Health Architecture, a collaboration of multiple government agencies, has released an enhanced version of the open source CONNECT software for secure health information exchange.
-----

Independent docs not optimistic about accountable care, EHRs

Author Name Jennifer Bresnick   |   Date August 12, 2013  
Independent physicians are significantly less optimistic about the state of the healthcare industry than their employed or hospital-based peers, according to a new survey conducted by athenahealth.  With three quarters of independent doctors not even sure small practices will be able to survive the changes in store for healthcare over the next few years, trepidation over the murky path forward colored most of the findings in this year’s Physician Sentiment Index (PSI) report.
Accountable care figured largely in physicians’ minds when asked about the future of medicine, and the response to pay-for-performance medicine was mixed.  While physicians don’t necessarily blame payers for the difficulty of getting reimbursed for services, they do feel that accountable care initiatives might make the process even more burdensome.  Three-quarters of respondents said they have only “heard of” or are “somewhat familiar with” the idea of an accountable care organization (ACO), so it might be a lack of knowledge that’s holding back their enthusiasm.
-----

Interoperability Plan Underwhelms, Mostashari Resigns: Now What?

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , August 13, 2013

In seven weeks, providers are supposed to be implementing stage 2 of Meaningful Use. The government's interoperability plans are lacking. And a key Washington player says he's leaving the scene. It's starting to look like a calamity.
As if the turbulence of July 2013 on healthcare IT wasn't bad enough, last week things got arguably worse.
First, Farzad Mostashari, director of the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT at the Department of Health and Human Services, announced he is resigning, staying on just long enough for a replacement to be found.
-----

Feds dropped the ball on interoperability acceleration

August 8, 2013 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
I eagerly awaited the announcement from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services this week about how they would respond to their Request for Information on accelerating health information exchange and interoperability.
But I was rather disappointed when they unveiled ... not much of anything on Wednesday morning.
Sure, they announced some principles and strategies. They proposed a complex care management fee conditioned on electronic summary of care record exchange. They're using incentives, such as new reimbursement models and the Meaningful Use incentive program. And they're incorporating HIE into Medicaid and other state payment policies.   
-----

EHR analytics can identify diabetes earlier and in real time

Author Name Jennifer Bresnick   |   Date August 7, 2013   |  
EHR algorithms scanning patient records for signs of diabetes can identify sufferers more than 90% of the time, and predict the exact date of a diagnosis for the disease in 78.4% of cases, according to research published in BioMedCentral.   Using only data typically entered into an EHR, the algorithm can prevent a delayed diagnosis in 11% of patient cases, allowing physicians to prescribe treatment earlier than ever before.
Diabetes is seen as a prime example of how data analytics can improve care and reduce the costs associated with poorly controlled chronic diseases.  With the disease affecting 25.8 million people, and costing $174 billion annually, diabetes is an effective test case for the principles of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH), accountable care organizations (ACOs), and the power of predictive EHR analytics.  There is often a significant delay in the diagnosis and treatment of the condition, the researchers from the University of California San Francisco say, with a median delay between onset and treatment of 2.4 years, and 7% of cases going completely undiagnosed for a whopping seven years.
-----

Telepsychiatry Poised To Take Off, but Obstacles Remain

by Rebecca Vesely, iHealthBeat Contributing Reporter Monday, August 12, 2013
Telepsychiatry, or e-therapy, has been around since the 1950s, but advances in secure communications technologies, combined with a national shortage of mental health professionals, are energizing the field.
The widespread adoption of tablet computers and smartphones and cheap and secure two-way video communications systems are accelerating the e-therapy field, experts say. Still, roadblocks remain, including reimbursement methods and clinician licensing and credentialing across states and health systems.
"Suddenly, you have a $1,000 setup cost instead of a $15,000 setup cost," said Avrim Fishkind, president and CEO of JSA Health Telepsychiatry in Houston and past president of the American Association of Emergency Psychiatry.
-----

Strides made in sharing data between public, private institutions

Sharing patient records between public and private institutions will streamline care
Monday, 12 August, 2013 [Updated: 9:47AM]
Patients lugging unwieldy CT scans and X-rays to their doctor's office could soon be history.
In an eHealth Forum held earlier this month, IT and medical professionals shared the progress of their drive to set up a platform for sharing of electronic medical data between the private and public health sectors.
Doctors will be able to recognise how community diseases spread...and identify hot spots of diseases 
Stephen Lieber, ceo of a non-profit health care information group
"In 2005, medical records in the public sector were accessible to the private sector for the first time, but it was only one-way, with the private sector being able to see records in the public sector," says Dr Cheung Ngai-tseung, chief medical information officer with the Hospital Authority.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Scotland Shows How Incremental Improvement In E-Health Can Make A Positive Difference.

The following very interesting article appeared a little while ago.

Scots deploy Key Information Summary

15 August 2013   Rebecca Todd
More than 60% of Scottish GP practices are live with the new Key Information Summary for patients with complex care needs.
Nearly 20,000 KIS records have already been created and the full roll-out is expected to be complete in three weeks.
KIS programme manager Jonathan Cameron said all the country’s Emis practices are live with the new service and around one third of INPS practices.
The KIS is an extension of Scotland’s Emergency Care Summary.
It contains information from the GP practice including; patient demographics; details of staff involved in the care of the patient; main diagnosis and current issues; carer and support details; and recommended actions for out of hour’s clinicians.
It is designed primarily to support patients with long term conditions, but Cameron said anyone can have one.
Their creation involves the GP sitting with the patient to discuss their ‘anticipatory care plans’ and deciding together whether the information should be shared via a KIS.
This could include someone’s end of life wishes.
Clinicians working in NHS 24 and out-of-hours services can access the information via an embedded button in their systems, which is also being added to clinical portals in acute trusts.
More here:
You can read about the progress being made here:
Here is a short summary of the KIS system:

What is a Key Information Summary (KIS)?

Key Information Summary (KIS) has been designed to support patients who have complex care needs or long-term conditions.
KIS allows important patient information such as those listed below to be shared with health care professionals in unscheduled care in the NHS 24, A&E, Scottish Ambulance Service, Out of Hours, Hospital and Pharmacy environments.
  • future care plans
  • medications
  • allergies
  • diagnoses
  • patient wishes
  • carer and next of kin details
In the future, KIS will also be used in scheduled care for patients with long-term conditions; for example, for those who regularly visit renal clinics.
More here:
This really looks like the sort of approach to gradual e-Health deployment and use we should look at very much harder.
David.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

This Is A Really Messy Outcome That Seems To Have Happened When People Were Opted-In To A Shared EHR.

The following appeared a little while ago.

Patient lost £18,000 legal battle over GP medical records

Sara Tenneson faces paying hefty legal costs after she tried to have confidential information removed from her file
The retired garden historian's experience is a cautionary one for NHS patients who think they control what's on their medical records.
In a pilot scheme NHS England recently began quietly uploading patient records from 100 GP surgeries, although the information commissioner warned the health service "there is still a lot of work to be undertaken to ensure that all of the obligations of the Data Protection Act will be met before national roll-out ... can begin."
Some are disturbed by the strategy to go "digital by default". Andrew Miller, chair of the Commons science and technology committee, wrote to Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude with concerns that "as public services go online, the government may not keep up with advances in technology and that inadequacies in government software may lead to security vulnerabilities".
The NHS is of particular concern as patient data is supposed to be anonymised. Martyn Thomas, vice-president of the Royal Academy of Engineering and chair of the IT policy panel of the Institution of Engineering and Technology, told the committee that personally identifiable data in medical records could be matched against other datasets. "That has been demonstrated time and time again. Therefore, the notion of useful anonymised personal data is an oxymoron."
Phil Booth, co-ordinator at patient privacy group medConfidential, said that though the changes are "momentous", not enough has been done to explain what they mean for patients. "A few breezily-worded leaflets in your GP's waiting room isn't proper notification for the systematic hoovering up of confidential information from 50 million peoples' medical records. So much for choice and consent – patients are deliberately being kept in the dark."Challenging the medical establishment's ownership of her patient record left Sara Tenneson without access to a regular GP. Her plight is at the heart of a tussle between bureaucrats and the public, with ministers publishing draft guidance for citizens to be able to remove "data whenever (they) want".
Her ordeal began in September 2011, when Tenneson's GP wrote a referral letter to a hospital consultant about her treatment which included information on a traumatic episode imparted to her previous GP in 1995, but which she was unaware was still on her medical record.
Fortunately, having sight of the letter before it was sent, and extremely shocked that it had been included, she asked the practice to remove it, as it had ''no relevance.'' The information was removed, and a revised letter was sent.
More of the saga here:
This is a very, very sad saga which it is important for all of us with an interest in Australian e-Health are aware of.
Clearly if you are going to have an opt-in approach, which we might just see from a desperate Government if the PCEHR is not being used a year from now, you need to ensure everything that goes to the record is seen and approved by the patient. It is as simple as that!
David.

Coalition Health Policy Announced Today. E-Health Not Mentioned Much!

This was released today.

Tony Abbott - The Coalition's policy to support Australia's health system

The Coalition’s Policy to Support Australia’s Health System will tackle chronic diseases, provide faster access to newly approved medicines, invest in Australia’s medical workforce and prepare the health system for the demographic changes ahead.
A healthier Australia means a stronger and more productive Australia.
The last Coalition government delivered a world class health system underpinned by a growing, strong economy. The Coalition has the experience to deliver real changes to our health system and to ensure those changes are sustainable into the long term.
The Coalition’s Policy to Support Australia’s Health System will:
  • Deliver greater community involvement in the management and responsibility of local hospitals;
  • Restore the independence of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) and restore integrity to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing process so that medicines can get to patients faster;
  • Provide the Health Minister with authority to list medicines recommended by the PBAC that do not cost more than $20 million in any of the first four years of its listing;
  • Bring forward the proposed roll-out of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme;
  • Develop a new National Diabetes Strategy as well as provide $35 million to find a cure for Type One Diabetes;
  • Restore the Private Health Insurance Rebate as soon as we responsibly can;
  • Deliver a more efficient funding model for hospitals through activity-based funding
  • Strengthen primary care by providing $52.5 million to expand existing general practices for teaching and supervision and invest $119 million to double the practice incentive payment for teaching in general practice;
  • Provide 500 additional nursing and allied health scholarships for students and health professionals in areas of need as well as $40 million for 400 medical internships;
  • Review the Medicare Locals structure to ensure that funding is being spent to support frontline services.
Our approach to health will be careful, collegial and consultative. We will work with the states and territories in delivering a world class health system.
By contrast, Kevin Rudd’s own former health minister described his approach to health reform as “cynical” and potentially “a disaster”.
With demand for health services expected to grow, we want to direct more resources to the frontline and remove unnecessary bureaucracy. We believe this is possible as the Commonwealth now has 18 separate health agencies in addition to the Department of Health.
Our approach to direct more resources to the frontline is in stark contrast to the $1.6 billion in cuts – some of which were retrospective – with which Labor hit our state hospitals.
By cutting waste, streamlining bureaucracy and providing strong and competent leadership, we can then provide much-needed resources to areas such as the provision of dental services to disadvantaged and vulnerable members of the community.
The Coalition has a proud record of strong and capable leadership in health.
As part of the last Coalition government, we delivered a Medicare Safety Net, a four-fold increase in medical research funding, a strong private health insurance industry that took pressure off the public system, a Medicare dental scheme for those with a chronic disease and the largest investment in mental health in Australian history at the time.
The best guarantee for a strong and sustainable health system is proper management of the budget and the economy by a government that can live within its means. Only the Coalition has demonstrated it can deliver this.
The Coalition’s Policy to Support Australia’s Health System is part of our Real Solutions Plan to build a stronger Australia and a better future for all Australians.
Here is the link:
Seems the e-Health Program is not big enough to attract much attention - or is what they have to say going to be negative? Would have been nice to hear something solid?

In the full .pdf of the policy a review of the PCEHR is mentioned.

http://tonyabbott.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DRbioW4-J0w%3d&tabid=86


Page 15:

"Health professionals will be increasingly reliant on effective e-health tools to better
coordinate care, particularly for patients with complex health conditions. Unfortunately, the Labor Government has failed to deliver on its Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).


Despite the $1 billion price tag, only 4,000 records are reported to be in existence. In recent weeks, the clinical advisers for Labor's e-health record program have quit
en masse, leaving the Federal Government's flagship programme floundering with virtually no clinical oversight.


If elected, the Coalition will undertake a comprehensive assessment of the true status of the PCEHR implementation. In government, the Coalition implemented successful incentives to computerise general practice and will continue to provide strong in principle support for a shared electronic health record for patients.The Coalition will again work
with health professions and industry to prioritise implementation following a full
assessment of the current situation."

 The ALP also does not seem to mention the issue. See here:

http://www.alp.org.au/betterhealth

Seems like both sides detect a need to say very little.

David.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

NEHTA Clinical Lead Resignations Round Up And Some Thoughts On Implications For The Future.

I had heard some rumours on this news Tuesday afternoon and these were confirmed when this came in early Wednesday  August 14, 2013:

Peter Fleming to NEHTA staff:

Dear Colleagues,
This announcement is to inform you that Dr Mukesh Haikerwal AO will soon be stepping aside from the role of National eHealth Clinical Lead and Head of Clinical Leadership and Stakeholder Management with NEHTA.
I would like to acknowledge the tremendous expertise that Dr Haikerwal has contributed to eHealth in Australia. For many years he has been a tireless advocate to turn the eHealth vision into reality, with the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record system now being well established and moving into a new phase. Dr Haikerwal will no doubt continue to advocate for the transformative ability of technology to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes for all Australians, and indeed worldwide in his role as Chair of the World Medical Association.
Over the past months, Dr Haikerwal and I have been in discussions with the Department of Health and Ageing about the way NEHTA and governments engage with healthcare providers, peak bodies, consumers, vendors and other key stakeholders who are playing a role in transforming healthcare delivery through eHealth.
This discussion aligns with NEHTA’s shift in focus from designing and building national eHealth infrastructure to implementing and supporting adoption of eHealth. As we are reaching the conclusion of these discussions, Dr Haikerwal has advised me that he sees this as the right time for him to step aside from the leadership role with NEHTA he has held for the past six years.
Mukesh brought to NEHTA the advocacy for a clinically led national eHealth programme and built a strong network of clinical leads who are experts across the entire Australian clinical landscape. This network, together with the internal Clinical Unit Mukesh developed, were successful in embedding clinical perspectives and needs into the design of NEHTA specifications which directly support the uptake of eHealth systems which are being implemented today. It is this tireless effort in the years of design which has provided a solid foundation for years to come. Mukesh will officially finish at NEHTA on 22 August.
On behalf of NEHTA, I wish Mukesh the very best in his future endeavours and look forward to continuing our dialogue on eHealth in the future.
The Executive team are meeting next Wednesday to discuss changes to NEHTA’s structure that arise from Mukesh’s departure and other recent changes. I anticipate these changes will be finalised and communicated shortly thereafter.
Regards
Peter
The first press coverage was found here:

Mukesh Haikerwal leads NEHTA exodus

  • by: Fran Foo
  • From: Australian IT
  • August 14, 2013 4:39PM
THE National E-Health Transition Authority has been rocked by the departure of top clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal alongside other senior executives working on the e-health records project.
Sources told The Australian that several clinical leads, including Nathan Pinskier and Chris Pearce, have also resigned.
Dr Haikerwal, a former Australian Medical Association president and NEHTA's head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, will officially leave on August 22.
He has been instrumental in promoting the benefits of the $628 million personally controlled e-health record system, especially in trying to woo doctors to adopt the platform.
Lots more here:
Next we had a good few on the next day:

Shock mass departure of NEHTA leads

15th Aug 2013
FOUR of the most senior clinical leads of the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) have quit following a massive breakdown in relations between the authority and the Department of Health and Ageing, sources confirmed today.
The shock departure included the man widely regarded as the figurehead of the personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) former AMA president Dr Mukesh Haikerwal and clinical leads, RACGP e-health standing committee members Dr John Bennett, Dr Nathan Pinskier, as well as Dr Jenny Bartlett.
All were understood to have had contracts which expired in August. A fifth clinical lead Melbourne GP Dr Chris Pearce told MO he had quit “not even remotely disgruntled”. Rather, he made the decision to concentrate on his research.
Lots more here:
Next we had this from the AMA.

Dr Haikerwal NEHTA resignation raises serious concerns about clinical input to PCEHR

15/08/2013
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that the resignation of Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, from the National Electronic Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) raises serious concerns about clinical input to decision-making in the implementation of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
The resignations of Dr Haikerwal, a former AMA President and NHHRC Commissioner, and other clinical leads, including Dr Nathan Pinksier, come amid reports that the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) is taking over engagement with the medical profession and IT industry over the design of the PCEHR.
Dr Hambleton said that the AMA has long advocated that the success of the PCEHR depended on how it met clinical needs.
Lots more here:
Then we also see the News Limited view:

Angry doctors quit over e-health system

  • SUE DUNLEVY
  • News Limited Network
  • August 15, 2013 10:14PM
THE government has been rocked by the mass resignation of doctors advising it on its troubled $1 billion e- health system.
The system barely functions a year after it was launched and this week former AMA president Dr Mukesh Haikerwal and Dr Nathan Pinksier and two other advisers quit in frustration.
Although 690,000 Australians have signed up for an e-health record the Department of Health has admitted only 5427 patient records have been provided by doctors.
"There is less than a 0.5 per cent chance that doctors or hospitals will find something of clinical relevance if they consult these records," Australian Medical Association chief Dr Steve Hambleton said.
"There are over 600,000 blank records which are of no use to anybody," he said.
Lots more here:
Last for the day here:

Dr Mukesh Haikerwal resigns from NEHTA Clinical Lead

Dr Mukesh Haikerwal has resigned his position as the national clinical lead for the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), and will finish the role on August 22, and NEHTA confirmed this morning that deputy clinical lead Dr Nathan Pinksier and Dr Chris Pearce have also quit.
However a spokesperson from the Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA) today confirmed that clinical engagement remains a top priority both for NEHTA and in other DOHA eHealth initiatives.
“We are continuing to work with NEHTA to revisit consultation and clinician arrangements to ensure that the Department takes a fresh look at the design of the PCEHR system and consults with those who will engage with it,” the spokesperson said today.
“The Department of Health and Ageing is taking the lead in the consultation with medical peak bodies and industry sectors, such as the new ICT Industry Consultative Forum bringing together more than 120 industry organisations next week and the PCEHR Peak Bodies Workshop next month,” the DOHA spokesperson said.  
More here:
Interestingly this was all not covered by the SMH or Age as far as I could find.
We then got official reaction from NEHTA.

Statement from Dr Mukesh Haikerwal AO

Created on Friday, 16 August 2013
On Tuesday 13 August 2013, I tendered my resignation from NEHTA effective Thursday 22 August 2013.
I have been with The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) as National Clinical Lead since the 2007 Boston Consulting Group report.
I am a passionate advocate for health and healthcare and maintain my fervent belief that eHealth will transform the way we receive care and practice medicine. My decision to move on from my role with NEHTA has not been made lightly, and of course there is never a ‘good time’ to take this step.
However, with the eHealth system now in its current place and moving into a different phase, this is the right time for me to step aside.
More here:
and some more in depth coverage here:

Doctors quit NEHTA en masse

16 August, 2013
The top team of clinical experts behind the billion dollar e-health record system have quit en masse, leaving the Federal Government's flagship program floundering with virtually no clinical oversight.
Among the first to go was NEHTA's head of clinical leadership Dr Mukesh Haikerwal (pictured), the former AMA president, who has been the medical face of the personally controlled e-health records (PCEHRs) for the last six years.
But other key players are also understood to have quit from the executive of NEHTA's so-called "clinical unit".
These include Melbourne GP Dr Nathan Pinskier, a member RACGP's national standing committee on e-health, and Dr John Bennett.
Australian Doctor also understands that Dr Jenny Bartlett, a former executive on the Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care, has left along with Dr Chris Pearce - although the reasons behind their decision to stand down are unclear.
More here:
The comments on this post are fascinating and make it clear that there are many who are less than impressed with the whole program.
Also we have here:

Doctors ready to pull plug on eHealth

Published on Fri, 16/08/2013, 08:43:39
By Julian Bajkowski
Australia’s long and troubled efforts to create a functioning national system of electronic health and medical records system is once more close to collapse.
The Australian Medical Association has expressed serious concerns over clinician input into the project following the shock resignation of highly respected clinical representative Dr Mukesh Haikerwal from the National eHealth Transition Authority (NeHTA) this week.
Other crucial clinical advisors, including Dr Nathan Pinksier and other clinical leads are also understood to have quit signalling a severe breakdown in relations between doctors and Department of Health and Ageing.
A loss of confidence by doctors in either DoHA or or NeHTA would, in practical terms, shut-off political life support for the circa $1 billion Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) project because the scheme cannot work unless doctors voluntarily agree to use it.
The urgent warning from the AMA in the wake of the clinicians’ walk out now puts substantial pressure on DoHA’s high profile secretary, Jane Halton, to personally intervene to get the project back on-track.
More here:
And here:

 ‘Souring relations’ spurred mass quit of NEHTA leads

16th Aug 2013
THE AMA has questioned the future medical viability of the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) after the shock departure of five senior clinical advisers including the scheme’s most vocal proponent Dr Mukesh Haikerwal.
The mass resignation of National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) clinical leads this week came amid reports of souring relations between the advisors and the Department of Health and reports that the department was taking an increasingly central role in the rollout.
The other resignations were RACGP e-health standing committee members Dr John Bennett and Dr Nathan Pinskier, as well as Dr Jenny Bartlett. Melbourne GP Dr Chris Pearce also quit but he told MO his decision was because of a desire to concentrate on research.
Lots more here:
Each of these articles provides a slightly different take on what has happened - and a worth reading in full - but the conclusion seems to be that this event is something of a watershed even in the life of the PCEHR.

For the last few months Dr Haikerwal and his colleagues (along with the AMA and the RaCGP) have been saying they are not happy with the way the PCEHR was evolving and the lack of clinical involvement in the overall process. NEHTA and DoHA did respond to this to some degree but apparently the response was either too little too late, not credible or not the right response and we have then seen what we seen.

There were also concerns about the fundamental design and its ultimate suitability for purpose.

What I also find very interesting is the degree of coverage these resignations have obtained. To me either this means that the journalists see an important statement being made here or it is recognised that we are in an election campaign and that this issue might just be important and get a run - especially with all the recent Government advertising on the topic.

There is another take on what is needed from Dr Edwin Kruys found here:
http://doctorsbag.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/how-to-save-the-pcehr/
Very sensibly he has a major focus on Governance - a line I have pushed for years now!

Another point that has not been mentioned as far as I know is that the current Deloitte’s Refresh of the National E-Health Strategy now has a real opportunity to see if some worthwhile improvement can now be planned. If ever there was a time for a full review - along in my view with a full review of the PCEHR Program by the Auditor General - it is now. It seems to me that without major change the whole thing is doomed.
I am interested in knowing what others think will be the outcome going forward.
David.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

The National Press Club Health Debate Next Tuesday Might Be Fun. Looks Like E-Health Is Seriously On The Coalition Radar.

This release appeared late last week:

Labor’s $1 billion E-Health Debacle

16 August, 2013
Labor’s implementation of an e-health patient record is a $1 billion disappointment.  With nearly $1 billion spent on the program, it has failed to deliver anywhere near what the Labor Government promised.
The e-health program has been shown to be more about politics than about policy and more about spin than about outcomes for patients.
“Australian Doctor has reported that there are only 4,000 e-health records in existence.  At a cost of $1 billion that works out at $250,000 per record,” said Peter Dutton.
“This latest development proves this government is incapable of delivering on e-health.  It speaks volumes about Labor’s incompetence,” he added.
Apart from the very low take up rate, the system itself is deeply flawed.  The Government has been throwing good money after bad, spending money getting Medicare Locals to sign people up to a program that does not yet have basic clinical protocols in place, let alone support from clinicians.
“The Coalition continues to provide in-principle support for e-health, but shares the concern of many in the sector about Labor’s incompetence in managing the process,” said Mr Dutton.
The previous Coalition Government achieved significant improvements in the computerisation of general practice, from 17 per cent to over 94 per cent, by working with the profession and implementing effective policy. 
“If elected, the Coalition will assess the true status of the PCEHR implementation and again work with health professionals and the broader sector to provide real results on this important reform for patient care,” Mr Dutton said.
The e-health debacle follows a pattern of waste and incompetence from the Labor Government.  It joins the ranks of catastrophically mismanaged programs such as pink batts and school halls.
It also follows Labor’s failure to deliver on its much promised GP Super Clinics and the 16 Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centres which never materialised.
The release is found here:
There is some commentary and background here:

Coalition slams Labor’s “$1bn e-health debacle”

news Shadow Health Minister Peter Dutton has taken a pickaxe to the Federal Government’s Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) scheme, claiming the costly project was “more about spin than about outcomes for patients”.
The project was initially funded in the 2010 Federal Budget to the tune of $466.7 million after years of the health industry and technology experts calling for development and national leadership in e-health and health identifier technology to better tie together patients’ records and achieve clinical outcomes. The project is overseen by the Department of Health and Ageing in coalition with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA).
However, last month the Government revealed it had failed to meet it initial 500,000 target for adoption of the system, with only close to 400,000 Australians using the system at that point.
At the time, University of Western Australia software academic David Glance severely criticised the scheme. “… even if the government had met the target of 500,000, it would have been a meaningless gesture,” Glance wrote at the time. “The vast majority of those who have signed up, if they ever get around to logging in, will be greeted with an empty record.”
“Given the lack of active participation on the part of GPs, as well as the lack of public hospital systems to integrate with PCEHR, there’s little evidence to suggest that this is going to change any time soon … GPs still struggle to see the benefit of spending time curating shared records when the legal liabilities are still unknown but are potentially severe.”
Just last week The Australian newspaper revealed that NEHTA had lost a number of senior executives, including clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal.
“The question is simply: If these experienced clinicians and e-Health ‘experts’ thought the PCEHR was a winner would they be bailing out at this time?” wrote prominent Australian e-health blogger David More in response to the news. “Surely they would want to be around for the kudos and rewards that would flow from a successful program?”
“The answer is really easy. Those who are leaving know vastly more than you about the program and its risks and benefits – and yet they want out. It makes it totally clear this is a lemon on which no more time should be wasted by you or your colleagues until [The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners] and the [Australian Medical Association] are convinced – and say so and it is properly redesigned and fixed, so that the PCEHR is now both useful, safe and fit for purpose.”
More here:

Election 2013 Health Policy Debate

The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP Vs the Hon Peter Dutton MP

August 27, 2013

11.30am - 1.30pm

Here is the link:
Both Sky News and ABC News 24 typically carry these events live.
See here for example:
It will be great fun to see what is actually said on the day.
Given where the betting markets are at present on the outcome of the election I suspect what Mr Dutton has to say will be pretty important, given the press release above.
David.