Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Post - Budget Review Of The Health Sector Outcomes- 20th May 2014.

Budget Night was on Tuesday 13th May, 2014.
Here are some of the more interesting articles I have spotted this week since it happened. Since the budget was handed down all hell has broken out in the Health Sector. I will try to get the main themes.
They seem to divide into two big areas.
First the immediate changes - the co-payments on GP visits and increase in PBS co-payment, rationalising of a range of administrative and support functions and major changes to Medicare Locals and continued PCEHR Funding.
The bigger hit seems to come in a few years to all the State Hospital Funding - from 2017 on there is about $50B extra to States have to find.
The Senate may have a lot to say about some of the early planned changes - and the State Governments are pretty grumpy about the later changes.
We sure do live in interesting times!
-----

General.

Budget impacts on the economy, tax and markets

Australian budget
Here are:
Westpac on the Budget.
NAB on the Budget.
COMMSEC on the Budget.
PWC on tax implications.
KPMG on business implications.
JP Morgan on market implications.
Enjoy!
-----
12 May 2014, 5.22am AEST

Australia’s ‘unsustainable’ health spending is a myth

Jeff Richardson

Professor and Foundation Director, Centre for Health Economics at Monash University
The unsustainability of government health expenditure in Australia is a myth that has been carefully nurtured to justify policies to transfer costs from government to the public.
Tomorrow’s budget is expected to introduce co-payments for visits to the doctor and other ways to reduce health spending. The government argues that it must do this because health spending is out of control and the new measures are necessary to make Medicare sustainable.
But evidence contradicts this argument.
-----

Budget 2014: How you are affected

14th May 2014
THE federal budget amounts to the "murder of Medicare" and the end of bulk-billing, according to detractors who are not placated by the surprise announcement of a $20 billion Medical Research Future Fund.
As predicted, Treasurer Joe Hockey last night confirmed that most MBS rebates will be cut by $5, and a $7 co-payment will apply to GP visits from 1 July next year. 
Previously bulk-billed patients will make a contribution of at least $7 to the cost of most visits to the GP and out-of-hospital pathology and diagnostic imaging services.
Concessional patients and children under 16 will have their $7 contribution capped at 10 visits. 
------

Health budget full of hurt for patients – AMA

THE 2014 federal health budget is full of pain for patients, says the Australian Medical Association (AMA).
The association’s vice-president, Professor Geoffrey Dobb, says patients – especially vulnerable patients such as the chronically ill, the elderly, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, and low-income families – will pay more for their health care.
“Many Australians already pay a co-payment, and there is a place for co-payments for patients with the right model – but this is not the right model,” Professor Dobb says in a statement.
“It does not have the right protections.”
-----

Budget: Health highlights

By Natasha Egan on May 14, 2014 in Government, Industry
At a glance:
·         Boost to medical research, with $200 million for dementia 
·         Funding to continue for PCEHR
·         Medicare Locals replaced 
·         HWA rolled into department of health
Fulfilling a pre-election commitment, last night’s Federal Budget 2014-15 provided $200 million over five years for research to improve treatment for dementia in Australia. Funding will go towards establishing a National Institute for Dementia Research, which will bring together existing resources and infrastructure to coordinate research priorities and translate existing dementia research into policy and practice.
The funding also delivers $9 million for Brisbane’s Clem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, which focuses on the prevention and treatment of dementia, as per a previous commitment.
Medical research in the medium to long term will get $276.2 million over three years from 1 July 2015 from the Medical Research Future Fund. In the long term the fund will provide a sustained funding stream for medical research with payments growing to around $1 billion per year from 2022‑23.
The government is continuing to fund the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for another year with $140.6 million allocated for 2014-15 while it finalises its response to the review of the PCEHR.
-----

Budget 2014: the good, the bad and the ugly (but mostly the ugly….)

Jennifer Doggett | May 14, 2014 12:57PM
With the bulk of the Health Budget already in the public domain, last night’s Budget speech was less about new announcements and more about selling the already unpopular measures to the Australian public.  Attempting to convince consumers to cough up more for their health care is not an easy task and in spinning the new payments as “opportunity not austerity”, Joe Hockey brought political performance art to a new level.  Indeed, with his love of a clichéd image (“we all need to share the heavy lifting”), the smoke and mirrors acts (pay more for GPs but get a cure for cancer!) and a show stopper of a stunt (the world’s biggest medical research fund!), the Treasurer seemed at times only one bearded transvestite away from a winning Eurovision entry.  
The much debated GP co-payment, along with an additional $5 for non-concessional PBS prescriptions, were predictably the focus of much media and stakeholder attention. The net impact of these additional co-payments will be to increase the cost burden on people who are poor, sick and vulnerable, creating additional access barriers to cost-effective preventive care and potentially increasing downstream health care costs.  The small reduction in the Medicare safety-net thresholds, to start in 2016, is woefully inadequate to support the increased numbers of people who will have difficulty meeting their health care expenses. 
-----

Dutton’s post-Budget speech

Jennifer Doggett | May 16, 2014 10:24AM
In Health Minister Peter Dutton’s first speech post-Budget speech he outlines the Government’s approach to health funding cuts and spending measures, including the following four principles:
1. that we must spend taxpayer funds on programmes and services that improve health outcomes for Australians;
2. that bureaucracy and red tape should be cut, and efficiencies and productivity improvements continually found;
3. that people should take more responsibility for their own health, including through modest contributions to the cost of care; and
4. that we must set up the health system for the future.
-----

Weighing up the cost of the health of a nation

Date May 16, 2014

Peter Martin

Economics Editor, The Age

Imagine for a moment the government is serious about reining in health costs. What should it do?
Should it invest heavily in preventive health, trying to change lifestyles so more people don’t get ill in the first place, or should it amass billions for medical research?
A government concerned about pay offs will do the first. Or it may decide to do both, investing in preventive health while also putting aside funds for medical research. What it won’t do is shut down existing attempts to prevent illness in order to fund research. That’s if it is serious.
-----

A fib too far: the death rattle of political trust

By ABC's Jonathan Green
Updated Thu 15 May 2014, 10:39am AEST
This Budget reveals a government that prioritises, then rations, its truthfulness, and does it with a brazen sense of self confidence, writes Jonathan Green.
"Is it liberating for a politician to decide election promises don't matter?"
7:30's Sarah Ferguson stopped Joe Hockey in his tracks with that one, a question that went beyond the superficial cut and thrust of the political exchange to something rather closer to its inner psychology.
A key question though, for if this Budget marks anything it is another decisive step in the distancing of the political class from the interests of the public it nominally serves, another step toward politics' slow conversion into pure performance.
-----

Axe falls on health agencies

15 May, 2014 AAP
The axe is starting to fall on federal health agencies set up by Labor governments.
Health Minister Peter Dutton on Thursday introduced legislation to abolish the Australian National Preventive Health Agency (ANPHA) and Health Workforce Australia (HWA).
"In health there has been too much officialdom, too much duplication," he told parliament.
-----

Labor blocks path to fiscal fix

BILL Shorten has dared Tony Abbott to force an election over the federal budget by vowing to vote down measures worth ­almost $18 billion, including new medical charges, education reforms and cuts to welfare.
He warned of a $6000 hit to families from the budget, in a ­policy ­assault aimed at derailing the most contentious elements of the government’s economic platform.
In his first budget reply as ­Opposition Leader, Mr Shorten accused the Prime Minister of misleading voters while imposing harsh cuts on the basis of the “myth” of a budget emergency.
“If you want an election, try us,” Mr Shorten said. “If you think Labor is too weak, bring it on.”
-----

GP Co-payments.

Health Minister Peter Dutton says Medicare fees will improve health outcomes

Date May 15, 2014 - 10:23PM

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

Health Minister Peter Dutton has predicted the introduction of a fee to visit the doctor will improve health outcomes by making it easier for patients to get an appointment and for doctors to spend more time with patients.
In an interview with Fairfax Media on Thursday, Mr Dutton said some medical practices had used bulk-billing as a "business enhancement technique" and the fee would create an incentive for doctors to charge all but the most needy patients for their care.
"It becomes a true safety net," he said. "At the moment, practices in capital cities are bulk-billing to gain market share."
-----

Federal Budget: Doctors vow to fight hospitals introducing co-payment for emergency department care

Date May 14, 2014 - 7:12AM

Julia Medew and Richard Willingham

Victorian doctors have slammed the new $7 co-payment for GP visits and medical tests and say they will fight hard to prevent Victorian hospitals from introducing similar fees for emergency department care. 
State and territory governments will be able to charge people for emergency department services after the Commonwealth announced that from July next year, Australians would be charged a $7 co-payment for GP visits, including imaging such as X-rays, and pathology such as blood tests.
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine spokesman Simon Judkins said the new fees could prompt more patients to go to emergency departments instead of their GPs because hospital treatment is free. 
-----

Doctors baulk at 25pc income cut if they don’t charge

May 15, 2014
Joanna Heath
GPs are rebelling against a 25 per cent cut in their income if they refuse to charge patients a $7 payment, which Treasurer Joe Hockey has hinted may be increased as a revenue-raising measure if the budget demands.
There is also concern about a lack of detail on how a $20 billion medical research fund, which will be given the money from the payments, will have its funding allocated.
Tuesday’s budget allows for GPs to waive the co-payment if they see fit, and expects patients with chronic illness not to be charged for visits.
But GPs who continue to provide visits free will miss out on a $6.20 incentive payment, and will also receive $5 less in Medicare rebates from the ­government.
-----

Joe Hockey challenges GPs over $7 co-payment

JOE Hockey has responded to criticism of the $7 co-payment for routine GP visits by saying doctors could instead take a cut to their Medicare rebate without requiring patients to make up the shortfall.
In one of the more controversial measures in the budget, the standard Medicare rebate would be cut by $5, and doctors encouraged to charge patients $7, which would provide them with an ­additional $2 towards the costs of running a practice.
Government surveys show many patients defer medical care due to cost, and a health department spokesman said the co-payment was estimated to cause a “slowing in the amount of times some people will visit their GP of around 1 per cent in the first year” but diminish over time.
-----

GP co-payment to hit indigenous population hard

Date May 18, 2014

Gareth Hutchens and Jonathan Swan

The largest Aboriginal medical service in the Northern Territory has slammed the Abbott government's $7 GP co-payment policy. And medical experts say the policy could widen the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous health.
On another front, the nation's peak body for Aboriginal health - the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) - says it is unsure if some of its 150 medical centres will lose tax-exempt status when the co-payment policy is introduced in July next year.
It said the Abbott government had failed to consult them about the policy and has not ''thought through'' its consequences.
-----

Co-payment unlikely to pass through Senate

15th May 2014
THE federal opposition has said it won't “horse-trade” over the government's planned Medicare co-payment, which looks unlikely to pass through the Senate.
Labor, the Australian Greens and the Palmer United Party have all declared they will oppose the $7 co-payment, which is supposed to help pay for the government’s new medical research future fund.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says he is open to "horse-trading" to get his government's first budget through the Senate.
But opposition health spokeswoman Catherine King dispelled any thoughts Labor may be willing to negotiate on the co-payment, which it has dubbed a "GP tax".
-----

NSW Health Minister says state will force health costs back onto the Commonwealth

Will Ockenden reported this story on Saturday, May 17, 2014 08:04:00
ELIZABETH JACKSON: The New South Wales Health Minister says if the Federal Government pushes ahead with a $7 co-payment for the doctor, the state will consider allowing GPs into hospitals to force the Commonwealth to pick up the costs.
New South Wales Health Minister Jillian Skinner says a medical co-payment will force more people into hospitals, but New South Wales will not charge patients who show up at emergency.
-----

Health funds like BUPA to pay doctors to keep patients out of hospital

  • May 17, 2014 12:00AM
  • SUE DUNLEVY National Health Reporter
  • News Corp Australia
HEALTH funds want to pay general practitioners to keep patients out of hospital in a health care revolution they claim will deliver “mind boggling savings” for our health system.
The insurers have presented a plan to Health Minister Peter Dutton that would see them sign doctors up to treat their members according to set clinical guidelines.
One major insurer, BUPA, is exploring the possibility of funding palliative care for dying patients in their own homes to cut costs and make patients more comfortable.
“For me dying with dignity is something everybody’s keen about,” BUPA managing director Dwayne Crombie told News Corp Australia.
-----

Leaving a sick feeling

Date May 17, 2014 - 1:15AM

Amy Corderoy, Dan Harrison

The new Medicare co-payment will hit the poor hard.
Carter Moore had a stomach ache. A trip to the GP and pathology test provided no answers, and later that night the pain became excruciating.
"I was in horrible pain, so I took myself to my local hospital," the former US resident explains. More tests.
A drip, and an overnight stay. The doctors decided it was probably dehydration. "I ended up paying between $450 and $500 all up, just because I was dehydrated," says the policy officer for the Consumers Health Forum of Australia.
-----

GPs told: use windfall to help needy

DOCTORS and healthcare providers will get a $468 million “windfall” under the Abbott government’s co-payment plan, giving them the capacity to continue treating poor and vulnerable patients without charge.
As debate over the contentious budget measure continued, Health Minister Peter Dutton revealed government modelling had guided the decision to set the co-payment at $7 to achieve both a pricing point and a “change in people’s behaviour”.
The modelling reveals the measure will slightly reduce the growth in GP visits and that the $2 doctors will receive each time a co-payment is made will deliver them $468m over the next four years. Supporters of the $7 co-payment argue that unless the growth in spending on doctor visits is curtailed, savings will have to be found in other areas of the health system including public hospitals.
-----

New $7 GP visit fee will not be a 'windfall', say doctors

Date May 17, 2014

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

Doctors have rubbished claims by Health Minister Peter Dutton that a $7 fee for GP visits will improve health outcomes by allowing doctors to spend more time with patients and make it easier for people to get an appointment with their doctor when they need one.
Australian Medical Association president Steve Hambleton also dismissed Mr Dutton's suggestion that the fee would provide a ''windfall'' to doctors that they could then spend to treat the most needy patients for free.
-----

Doctor’s fee is the iceberg’s tip

May 17, 2014
Medical expenses
Sally Patten
Households must absorb a myriad of small changes to medical expenses and rebates, and health insurance thanks to this week’s federal budget.
The $7 fee for doctor visits, which was dismissed by Treasurer Joe Hockey as the cost “of only a couple of beers or one-third of a packet of cigarettes”, is just the tip of the budget iceberg.
“It is going to be so difficult for people to keep up with all the little changes, but the little bits add up,” says Bryan Ashenden, head of technical at BT Financial Group, the wealth arm of Westpac Banking Corp.
-----

Co-payment $20bn line in sand

FUNDS generated by the Coa­lition’s medical co-payments and script increases will be returned to the health system once the new ­research fund has reached its $20 billion target.
Joe Hockey expects the new Medical Research Future Fund, proposed in the budget, to be fully funded in about six years.
Its financial investment strategy will be set by the current guardians of the Future Fund while the National Health and Medical Research Council will distribute grants to researchers. The fund is expected to generate $1bn a year in grants once it is fully funded.
-----

No way! GPs reject co-payment move

16th May 2014
A GRASSROOTS campaign has been backed by the RACGP which also launched its own against the government’s embattled $7 Medicare co-payment plan.
The college has launched the #CoPayNoWay public awareness campaign and backed another, #CoPayStories, which is the brainchild of David Townsend, the architect of last year’s successful Scrap the Cap campaign.
RACGP president Dr Liz Marles said a $5 cut to MBS rebates was designed to strong-arm doctors into charging the $7 fee. But in reality GPs would sometimes be forced to forgo it and take the hit, she said.
-----

Government may negotiate on $7 co-payment

May 16, 2014
Joanna Heath

Key points

  • GPs have the ability to waive the fee for needy patients if they want to.
  • Labor and the Greens have indicated they will not vote for a co-payment.
Health Minister Peter Dutton may be willing to negotiate the $7 ­payment for visits to doctors to appease the Senate and avoid a ­double-dissolution election.
Mr Dutton said he was confident the government could pass a law that would impose a $7 charge for GP visits, tests and imaging services. The money is earmarked for a $20 billion medical research future fund.
-----

Labor 'won't compromise' on co-payment

Updated: 7:54 am, Thursday, 15 May 2014
The federal opposition has warned it won't horse-trade over the government's planned Medicare co-payment, which looks unlikely to pass through the Senate.
Labor, the Australian Greens and the Palmer United Party have all declared they will oppose the $7 payment to see the doctor, which the coalition says will help pay for its new Medical Research Future Fund.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says he is open to 'horse-trading' to get his government's first budget through the Senate.
But opposition health spokeswoman Catherine King dispelled any thoughts Labor may be willing to negotiate on the co-payment, which it has dubbed a 'GP tax'.
-----

Medicare Locals.

Medicare Locals to be replaced by Primary Health Networks

15 May 2014 | Published by Michael Gorton, Jonathan Teh

The day before the Federal budget, Professor John Horvath’s Review of Medicare Locals was quietly published on the Department of Health’s website. The Review recommended the creation of Primary Health Organisations to replace 61 Medicare Locals and the Australian Medicare Local (AML) Alliance.

Unsurprisingly, the Federal budget broadly adopts the Review’s recommendations with a measure to replace the Medicare Locals with “fewer but larger” Primary Health Networks from 1 July 2015. 
Background
For those who haven’t followed their development, the Medicare Locals were established under the 2011 COAG National Health Reform Agreement.  They replaced the GP dominated Divisions of General Practice Program which had operated for decades. 
Medicare Locals were established in three tranches from July 2011, mostly as amalgams of existing GP divisions or associations.  In some cases, the Medicare Locals were new companies created by primary health stakeholders from the region.
-----

Nervous wait for Medicare Local staff as details on alternative system remain elusive

By JANICE HARRIS

May 16, 2014, 4 a.m.
UNCERTAINTY lies over the future of Orange Medicare Local staff and their colleagues from several offices in the region, after the announcement in the federal budget Medicare Local is to be axed.
Almost 150 staff and 50 contractors across the region are nervously waiting details of the changes planned by the government to set up an alternative to Medicare Local.
Chief executive officer of Medicare Local Western NSW, Doctor Jenny Beange, said the organisation is proud of its record of working with regional health groups, doctors and hospitals to provide specific services for communities.
-----

Medicare Locals ponder their future as Budget axes network

May 15, 2014
The Federal Government has cut specific funding for the network of 61 Medicare Locals around Australia, from the middle of next year.
Medicare Locals were established under Labor, to fill gaps in services, including mental health, GP and nurse primary care, after hours clinics and allied health like physiotherapists.
Andrew McPherson, the chief executive of the Grampians Medicare Locals in Victoria, says the future is uncertain.
"The Federal Government will cease funding us and 60 others from June next year.
"What will be put in place is primary health networks, which is pretty much what Medicare Locals are already.
"We think we're pretty well placed to participate in that transition."
Australian Medicare Local Alliance chair Dr Arn Sprogis says the government has made a shocking decision, which will affect frontline health services and the health and wellbeing of Australians around the country.
-----

AMA slams Medicare Locals

13 May, 2014 Amanda Davey
The future is not looking bright for the much-maligned Medicare Locals with the AMA now coming out in support of a damning federal government-commissioned review released this week.
Led by former chief medical officer, Professor John Horvath, the review of 61 Medicare Locals found they should be scrapped in their current form because they are failing to deliver, lacked direction and were duplicating existing services.
Now the AMA has weighed in on the issue calling for fundamental changes to the operation.
-----

Pharmacy.

Coalition highlights healthy payments

CO-PAYMENTS have been required for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme since 1960 — when patients were asked to pay five shillings for a script — and now make up 14.4 per cent of the cost of government-listed medi­cines.
Amid continuing debate over plans for a $7 co-payment for standard Medicare consultations, such as a routine visit to the doctor or test, government figures show the contribution Aus­tralians are already making to the sustainability of the PBS.
In 2012-13, patients contributed 14.4 per cent, or $1.511 billion, to the PBS, with the government picking up the remaining 85.6 per cent ($8.996bn).
Health Minister Peter Dutton said the existing PBS co-payment of $36.90, or $6 for people with a concession card, demonstrated why the Medicare co-payment plan would work.
-----
Comment:
Over to you to decide what you think. Seems to me a lot of this is going to struggle in the Senate (both old and new versions)
To remind readers there is also a great deal of useful health discussion here from The Conversation.
Also a huge section on the overall budget found here:
Enjoy.
David.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

We Have To Be Very Clear The Report Of The PCEHR Team Is Not Government Policy. However, What Does It Suggest and Will It Work?

I had an e-mail from the DoH E-Health Branch today  which makes this very clear. We are at the beginning of a journey.
“Dear colleague
I am writing to let you know that the Government has released the review of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). A copy of the report is available at:
The Government supports a national eHealth record system, but it needs to be effective, functional and easy for all Australians to use, while being clinically relevant to doctors, nurses and other frontline healthcare providers.  
The review makes 38 recommendations and outlines opportunities to improve the usefulness of the system.
The Government will continue considering the recommendations over the coming months to understand the issues, their implications and in consultation with key stakeholders, determine the best ways to deliver on the intended outcomes,
As part of this commitment, the Department will be undertaking a range of consultation activities to consider options for responding to the Review recommendations .
I look forward to working with you over the coming months to improve the current and future capacity of Australia's health care system.
Linda Powell
First Assistant Secretary
eHealth Division”
I hope we get both consultation and listening this time!
With that made clear what about the report itself?
First - We have a Vision (p2)
“The electronic health record for Australians, will be a reliable, secure and trustworthy source of key clinical information. It will facilitate efficient and effective treatment of patients by health practitioners and enable consumers to access and manage their own health records in cooperation with their health providers to improve care. It will respect individual privacy but be clinically valuable to all areas of the health care industry. Interaction with the electronic health record will be highly automated and form a natural part of clinical workflows. The value of sharing health information electronically between healthcare professionals, will be demonstrated by enhanced efficiency and effectiveness of the delivery of healthcare, reduced hospitalisations and ultimately lives saved.”
What is made most clear here is an obvious shift which  really suggests a change of intent. As I read this what is now being sought is a record for use by clinicians to co-ordinate their care while providing access to allow the patient to be involved and be aware and comment on what is happening to them. However the issue of having a local and a parallel national system is still not clearly addressed.
Reading the report I noted the following:
1. The level of actual use of the system was actually going down despite continuing patient registrations.
2. The 2013 National E-Health Strategy Refresh is yet to be finalised. - but a (secret) summary exists.
3. The Panel felt the e-Health infrastructure (SMD, IHI, NASH, NPC ) were all in good shape. Some may be not so sure.
4. The benefits case is a total joke - conflating local systems and the PCEHR and pretending to understand the level of benefits possible (p9-11).
5. The barriers to implementation of e-Health slide (p11) certainly covers a lot of the issues.
6. The recommendations are summarised on p15-18 and available in a previous from a blog of May 19, 2014.
7. The rename to MyHR seems at odds to seeking more clinician use.
8. The governance recommendations seem good:
“Given the scale and complexity of the national eHealth work program, Australian Governments should continue to play a lead role in directing and coordinating national implementation activities. However, the move from a focus on nationally shared eHealth infrastructure to meaningful use of eHealth solutions by care providers and consumers, argues the case for a more broadly based involvement in the governance process – particularly extending to clinical and patient communities and private sector health operators.
Key to strengthening the current governance arrangements will be the establishment of an eHealth entity (created through the transformation of NEHTA) that is focused on coordinating execution of the national strategy and the nationally funded eHealth work program. To perform this role it will be necessary for the eHealth entity to have a Board made up of key parties beyond Government representatives (including strong care provider and consumer representation) and to oversight the building of close working relationships across the public and private health sectors and with the health IT vendor community.
Deloitte : National e-Health Strategy for Australia November 2013”(p20).
9. The Panel notes that NEHTA and DoHA just ignored most stakeholders most of the time (How true) (p21)
10. There seems to be an Independent Advisory Council for the PCEHR - members not listed and clearly hardly working if the last 2 years are any guide. (p26)
11. The move to opt out is reasonable but won’t happen in 7 months - and rushing it could be a big problem. (p29)
12. When the Panel says “The PCEHR should be considered a source of supplementary information.” They have it right in my view.  (p31).
13. It seems the Panel noticed patients like to be able to message doctors….”In addition, Secure Messaging is a closed network that operates between clinicians and it has not been designed to include providing Secure Messaging to patients and consumers. Action must be taken to expand the scope of Secure Messaging to a next generation service that ensures interaction between the medical profession and consumers for information that must be passed in a reliably secure manner to facilitate improved workflow and secure communication of private information.”(p40).
14. The NEHTA not listening again theme.
“It is acknowledged that a substantial amount of input was provided by various industry user groups during the development phase, and not incorporated into the PCEHR. Greater implementation of the recommendations provided during the development phase may have resulted in better acceptance and increased uptake of the PCEHR by both clinicians and individuals. Clearly, if the system is not designed around the realities of the clinical environment and workflows, then the uptake of the system will be limited.”
And:
“all medical specialties, other than General Practice, have been largely ignored”(p59)
15. More failure to do what was required from DoHA / NEHTA.
“The PCEHR Concept of operations refers frequently to the importance of governance. It quotes seven governance principles from the National eHealth Strategy including transparency, accountability, appropriate stakeholder representation, sustainability and the balance of local innovation and national outcomes. These principles were not followed, and the result is that a good plan failed.” (p78)
16. Accenture off on a bit of a frolic it seems from this.
“To ensure that the systems operator (in this case Accenture) does what it’s told by the system owner, which is to deliver the functionality specified by the system owner, rather than the operator delivering what it thinks/believes is best for the owner.”(p82)
17. The present PCEHR does not serve the key benefit opportunity. Bad design.
“Medicines management is a significant area of value that is not sufficiently supported within current PCEHR design” (p86)
18. Clinical risk is not really addressed properly.
“The current PCEHR has multiple safety risks including:
o Using administrative data (e.g. PBS data and Prescribe /Dispense information) for clinical purposes (ascertaining current medications) – a use never intended;
o Using clinical documents (discharge summaries) instead of fine- grained patient data e.g. allergies. Ensuring data integrity is often not possible within documents (e.g. identifying contradicting, missing or out of date data);
o Together the secreatean electronic form of a hybrid record with no unitary view of the clinical ‘truth’. Hybrid records can lead to clinical error by impeding data search or by triggering incorrect decisions based on a partial view of the record
o Shifting the onus for data integrity to a custodian GP avoids the PCEHR operator taking responsibility for data quality (a barrier to GP engagement and a risk because integrity requires sophisticated, often automated checking).
o No national processor standards to ensure that clinical software and updates (and indeed the PCEHR) are clinically safe.” (p88)
Overall p53 to p89 are the most valuable as collects all sorts of useful input and Panel .

Commentary.

My Overall Perspective On the PCEHR Review.

1. The key architectural flaws of the PCEHR are not understood and solutions for remedy proposed, neither is there any clarity as to what the system is to do and how it is not actually do it and for whom. It is also clear the panel really did not have a handle on what benefits the PCEHR can actually deliver.

2. If implemented as suggested the system will still not be successful as a valuable clinical tool I believe.

3. To do what is recommended and nothing more will be expensive and has the feel of ‘applying lipstick on a pig’.

4. The lack of real e-Health expertise involved in undertaking this review really shows.

5. Unless opt-out is implemented with great care and much effort around data quality and reliability disaster awaits. This means the change must be slow, incremental and frequently reviewed.

6. Clinical Safety issues are skated over.

7. The fate of the important AMT is not properly identified.

8. DoH and NEHTA have been hopeless in the Governance of Australian e-Health.

9. This is a seriously missed opportunity to make a sensible difference.

Sadly I could not go much above 2/10 for a score.

Sad about that. I look forward to seeing what the Government decides to do. There is no way at all this document could be described as a comprehensive plan for e-Health as Mr Dutton claimed in December.

David.

Monday, May 19, 2014

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 19th May, 2014.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Obviously the big news in e-Health is that the Government has found $140m or so to keep the PCEHR going until they can work out what to do.
An amazing and unexpected outcome. I really thought we would have got an clear idea of what was going to happen in the Budget. Interestingly is seems ePIP and some Telehealth funding is going on for another year as well but the Medicare Local e-Health funding is ending.
-----

Budget 2014: PCEHR on ‘short leash’

THE Abbott government will provide $21 million to maintain the troubled $1 billion personally controlled e-health records system but there’s nothing in the kitty beyond 2014/15.
It remains unclear what the government plans to do with the PCEHR with a review into the program suppressed by the Department of Health.
The future of the National E-health Transition Authority is also murky.
The review was headed by UnitingCare Health Queensland chief Richard Royle and supported by Australian Medical Association president Steve Hambleton and Australia Post chief information officer Andrew Walduck.
-----

Trouble plagued eHealth project gets $140 million to continue pending review

By Julian Bajkowski on May 13, 2014 in Federal, Finance
Few cross-jurisdictional government projects offer the massive returns or decade-long grinding frustration that eHealth has delivered to its stakeholders.
But with health costs ballooning, the Abbott government was never going to write off more than $1 billion in sunken costs and axe the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record, despite the lack of conspicuous success to date.
-----

Budget 2014: E-health records system gets $141m to continue on

Summary: Australia's e-health system will push on in its current form while the federal government plans a response to a recent review into the system.
By Chris Duckett | May 13, 2014 -- 10:06 GMT (20:06 AEST)
Until the Australian federal government, and its Minister for Health Peter Dutton respond to the recently completed review into Australia's personally controlled e-health records (PCEHR) system, the PCEHR will push on with AU$140.6m in funding for this financial year.
Perceived as an underutilised system, earlier this year it was revealed in Senate Estimates that the system had moved from 900,000 registered users in November 2013 to 1.4 million customers by late February 2014.
Dutton, however, aimed up at the lack of clinicians using the system, what he labelled as a rushed implementation by the former government, and stated that the federal government would look to make the system more "practical".
-----

Snapshots: PCEHR funding / goodbye TUSMA / Office of the Privacy Commissioner established

2014 budget snapshots
Rohan Pearce (Computerworld) on 14 May, 2014 16:34

$140m for eHealth

The federal government has set aside $140 million in the budget for the operation of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) and to support other eHealth measures
The government "continues to work with stakeholders with regard to the recommendations from the recent PCEHR review to determine how best to proceed. The Government is committed to supporting improved productivity across the health sector and greater convenience for providers and patients," budget papers state.
"Implementation issues have plagued the PCEHR from day one, but the Abbott Government will get it back on track so that it provides real benefits to patients and health professionals alike," said a statement issued by the office federal health minister, Peter Dutton.
-----

Revealed: serious flaws in myGov site exposed millions of Australians' private information

Date May 15, 2014 - 3:38PM

Ben Grubb

A federal government department has been blasted over its "appalling response" to a security researcher's report which found it has been exposing millions of Australians' personal information by leaving serious security flaws unchecked in a critical government website.
The vulnerabilities were found in the myGov website, which stores the private records of Australians, including their doctor visits, prescription drugs, childcare and welfare payments. The Tax Office is expected to make the site mandatory for electronic tax returns this financial year. 
One of the several vulnerabilities foundwas so severe it allowed the researcher, Nik Cubrilovic, to hijack the account of any registered myGov user. 
-----

Federal Budget slices health expenditure, keeps PCEHR

The 2014 Federal Budget has introduced sweeping changes to Australia’s health system,  putting an end to free primary healthcare from July 2015  when bulk-billed GP consultations will attract a $7 co-payment charge, and fees will also apply to pathology and diagnostic imaging services performed outside the hospital system.
Professor Stephen Leeder, who is Director of the Menzies Centre for Health Policy and a professor of public health and community medicine at the University of Sydney, said that there is a “total lack of policy” behind the Budget cuts.
“Sometimes, something that looks like cutting red tape can actually be slicing an artery,” he said, noting that the funding cuts have hit preventative health care particularly hard.
-----

Making eHealth Work for Patients and Doctors

The Abbott Government will move to make the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system more practical for the Australian public, as well as for doctors, nurses, and other frontline health care providers.
Page last updated: 13 May 2014
13 May 2014
The 2014-15 Budget provides $140.6 million to support the operation of eHealth and the PCEHR system for 12 months, while the Government continues planning its response to recommendations in the recently completed PCEHR review.
Labor promised much with the PCEHR but delivered very little.
-----

Budget 2014: What is funded and what is cut?

Supercomputers in, regulators out.

There are no big ticket ICT projects in an austere 2014 Federal Budget, but plenty of cuts to keep the IT industry on tenterhooks. 
iTnews has combed the budget papers find out what Joe Hockey's first budget means for technology:
What is funded?:
  • Undisclosed funding for the Bureau of Meteorology to build its super-computer, with the weather agency currently testing the market for the work.
  • $140.6 million in 2014-15 for the continued operation of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system ,while the Government finalises its response to the review of the system. 
-----

Project STOP at risk of ending

12 May, 2014 Christie Moffat
A lack of government funding for the pseudoephedrine-monitoring program, Project STOP, could see the initiative come to an end.
As reported in The Age, ongoing debate about whether funding should come from the state or federal government has led to uncertainty about the future of the program beyond 2014.
Project STOP allows pharmacists to record the driver’s licence details of anybody who purchases pseudoephedrine into a database, which is monitored by investigators.
Since its national roll-out in 2007, the monitoring system has disrupted the abuse of pseudoephedrine by organised drug shoppers, tracking sales of high quantities of the drug.
-----

Absolutely bio-fabulous; ‘bioprinting’ to regrow damaged body parts

IT’S the stuff of science fiction — printing out body parts to regenerate worn-out hips, sprout new breasts after a mastectomy or recreate bones shattered in a car crash.
The futuristic technology has already been used overseas, and Australian scientists predict that hospitals here will be using 3D “bioprinting’’ to regrow damaged body parts within two to five years.
The process uses a 3D printer to manufacture a webbed “scaffold’’ made from a polymer material infused with a biological ink — which would cost $5000 per gram — that contains the patient’s own stem cells and growth agents.
The patient’s cells grow around the scaffold, and the original mould dissolves back into the body, much like stitches in wounds.
-----

Merge and rename Medicare Locals: govt report

12th May 2014
MEDICARE Locals should be renamed and carved up into a new national network with more hands-on involvement from GPs, according to a blueprint revealed on Monday.
The 61 organisations should be regrouped into a much smaller number of larger bodies with better efficiencies of scale, to be known as Primary Health Organisations (PHOs), according to the report posted without fanfare on the health department’s website.
While there are a few high performers, many of the Medicare Locals Labor set up in 2011 are not fulfilling their intended role, according to Professor John Horvath's report to Health Minister Peter Dutton.
-----

Human hands vs robotic surgery

13th May 2014
ORIGINALLY envisioned to enable surgeons to operate on battlefield casualties from a console far removed from the patient — potentially continents apart — robotic surgery is fast becoming the norm in the US for many gynaecological and urological procedures.
-----

Hospital adopts virtual desktops

A new hospital on the Sunshine Coast is using desktop virtualisation technology - but the biggest benefit probably isn't the one you'd expect.
Ramsay Health Care infrastructure engineer Barry White told iTWire that around 85% of the desktops at the recently opened Sunshine Coast University Private Hospital have been virtualised using Citrix XenDesktop.
The biggest advantage has accrued to clinical staff, as they are the employees who move around the hospital the most, and are the most likely to use shared computers. Rather than having to log out of Windows on one computer and then log in at another - which can be time-consuming - they can simply and quickly suspend their virtual desktop and resume it on the next computer they use.
-----

Health services go online: Diabetes support at centre of telehealth link to city specialists

By Kaitlyn Opie
May 12, 2014, 3:30 a.m.
LOWER Murray Medicare Local eHealth manager Troy Bailey is helping connect nine Sunraysia health organisations, including his own, to specialists in Melbourne.
Yesterday, Mr Bailey said that Sunraysia was fortunate to have partnered with the Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute and the Royal­ Flying Doctor Service.
“Health services have had no access to these kinds of specialist services for years,” he said.
Mr Bailey is providing his tele-health expertise to patients and health professionals, while Monash University School of Rural Health has offered its consulting rooms.
-----

Canberra’s tech projects handed expiry notice

NBN, NICTA to be cut off from the public purse.

Treasurer Joe Hockey has taken a knife to some of the Australian Government’s most ambitious technology projects in his 2014-15 Federal Budget, with looming funding deadlines now in place for the National Broadband Network and National ICT Australia.
And despite the Government's assurances about its continuation, the budget has also left little to allay the concerns of those advocating for a Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
The Abbott Government has stuck to its commitment of a $29.5 billion funding cap for the National Broadband Network, which had originally promised the structural separation of Telstra and a ubiquity of internet access for all Australians.
-----

Tech giants pour resources into artificial intelligence

Date May 10, 2014

Brandon Bailey

The latest Silicon Valley arms race is a contest to build the best artificial brains. Facebook, Google and other leading tech companies are jockeying to hire top scientists in the field of artificial intelligence, while spending heavily on a quest to make computers think more like people.
They're not building humanoid robots – not yet, anyway. But a number of tech giants and start-ups are trying to build computer systems that understand what you want, perhaps before you knew you wanted it.
"It's important to position yourself in this market for the next decade," said Yann LeCun, a leading New York University researcher hired to run Facebook's new AI division in December. "A lot is riding on artificial intelligence and content analysis, and on being smarter about how people and computers interact."
-----

SNOMED CT-AU May 2014 Release

Created on Friday, 16 May 2014
The SNOMED CT-AU May 2014 release is now available for download.
-----

Budget 2014: splitting watchdogs 'would shut door on open government'

Labor's Joe Ludwig labels reported plans to break up Office of the Australian Information Commissioner extremely concerning
Splitting Australia’s freedom of information and privacy watchdogs as part of cost-saving measures in Tuesday’s budget would shut the door on open government, according to the Labor senator Joe Ludwig.
ABC AM has reported that the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, which oversees privacy and freedom of information investigations and reviews in Australia, will have its functions split across several other departments.
Ludwig said reports the commissioner could be handed to the Attorney General’s Department were extremely concerning. The OAIC operates at arms length from the government and is often called on to review government decisions.
-----

Sharing Healthcare Data Between Primary and Secondary Usage

Posted on May 12, 2014 by Grahame Grieve
One of the difficult problems associated with healthcare information is sharing data between primary users and secondary data. In fact, it’s come up in quite a few places recently, and seems to be causing more noise than light. The problem is that these two user bases have such radically different views of how the data should be understood.
Secondary Use
The secondary users of data fundamentally live in a statistics orientated world view. If fact, to be clear, that’s how I define what a secondary user is – someone who wishes to do analysis (usually statistical) on the data.
-----

3D printed first to treat sleep apnoea

A new 3D printed device is set to end the suffering for thousands of sleep apnoea patients.
  • 7 May 2014
Using a 3D scanner to map a patient’s mouth, CSIRO researchers and Australian dental company, Oventus, can now print a mouthpiece which prevents dangerous pauses in breath during sleep.
Printed from titanium and coated with a medical grade plastic, the breakthrough mouthpiece is customised for each patient.
The device has a ‘duckbill’ which extends from the mouth like a whistle and divides into two separate airways. It allows air to flow through to the back of the throat, avoiding obstructions from the nose, the back of the mouth and tongue.
-----

NBN chief Ziggy Switkowski says $41bn cost ‘money well spent’

NBN Co chairman Ziggy Switkowski says spending $41 billion on the National Broadband Network would be “money well spent” despite a brutal federal budget looming next week.
“When the NBN is delivered for $41bn, I think all of us will believe that that’s money well spent,” Dr Switkowski said when asked how he could justify spending that amount on the NBN with a bleak budget ahead.
However, he was quick to point out that NBN Co was acutely aware that funding for projects that relied on the public purse was drying up.
“We’re very sensitive to the fact that we’re operating now in an era where capital is scarce,” Dr Switkowski said at a business lunch in Sydney.
-----

Navigation takes quantum leap

  • The Times
  • May 17, 2014 12:00AM
MANY drivers will have experienced the panic caused by losing GPS signal at a crucial moment of a journey. Now scientists have come up with an alternative technology — the quantum compass — which is immune to signal black spots and gives position information that is 1000 times more accurate than navigation systems.
Scientists at the British Ministry of Defence say the first application for the technology is likely to be in nuclear submarines, which operate beyond the range of ordinary GPS satellites in space. They will test a prototype on land next year.
-----
Enjoy!
David.