Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 27th May, 2014.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

The release of the PCEHR Review could have been expected to remove all other news from the airwaves bit it didn’t and we have all sorts of interesting stuff as well. A separate blog will review the PCEHR Review coverage.
-----

Why most health IT procurement fails and how to fix it

A strange thing happens in health IT solution procurement, and by extension government initiatives that seek to influence it. See if you can disagree with the following characterisation of health provider organisations as solution purchasers.

Think You’re Getting What You Want?

CIOs and CMOs have known for years if not decades that:
  • the data used inside their institution are their most important asset – either as a productive resource, or at least as an object of risk management. Most today would understand it as both.
  • the data used inside their institution is not all produced inside their institution – lab data often comes from external lab companies; they obtain or would like to obtain GP data such as medications lists, problem lists and so on;
  • their main vendor solution never supports the data richness actually required by clinicians - it is well known for example that most hospitals contain dozens if not hundreds of hidden specialist’s databases, often referred to as the ‘Access Database problem’;
-----

How to save our sick health system without GST hikes

At this point, Australia does NOT -- repeat NOT --  need an increase in GST to fund the shortfall in health.
The waste in health administration is so immense that there is enormous scope to cut costs and improve services.
Most attempts to reduce the health system’s costs have failed, but two recent events provide real hope that we are close to a breakthrough and can realise the sector’s cost-cutting potential. Only after we have fully pursued both of these new avenues should we consider increasing the GST.
The Australian health system is made up of about 100,000 small enterprises plus a few big hospitals, medical funds and, of course, government organisations. And in most sectors, apart from money matters, they don't talk to each other electronically, so the data collection duplication costs are mind-blowing. It could represent 20 or 30 per cent of costs. This is compounded by the paper-based internal workings of most hospitals. 
-----
Written by Renai LeMay on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 16:36

SA e-Health system could cause fatalities

blog It used to be pretty rare that Australia would see an IT system implemented or maintained so poorly that it had the potential to cause fatalities or serious injury. But not any more. This year we’ve seen three such cases in Victoria alone, linked separately to failing IT systems at Victoria Police (which actually did result in several deaths), a Victorian hospital and, most worryingly, with relation to children’s safety under the care of the Department of Human Services. Well, last week South Australia got its own potentially fatal IT system. Adelaide news site InDaily writes about the state’s new Enterprise Patient Administration System (we recommend you click here for the full article).
-----

Tiny breakthrough in medical implants

STANFORD University researchers have developed injectable power suppliers for pacemakers and nerve stimulators, opening the door to a new generation of microscopic medical implants.
The breakthrough, reported today in the journal PNAS, could lead to a new branch of medicine that treats diseases with electronics rather than drugs.
Most electronic implant components are now small enough to fit on tiny silicon chips but miniaturisation of power sources has not kept pace and many devices require bulky recharging systems or batteries, which need to be surgically replaced when they run down.
Scientists have experimented with “near field” electromagnetic waves as an alternative power source, but they have been considered viable only for shallow implants such as hearing devices a centimetre beneath the skin’s surface.
-----

Health CIO expects 'strong views' on opt-out PCEHR

Outsourcing RFT due this month.

Federal health CIO Paul Madden expects some “strong and sharp” views from various interest groups this year, as the government consults on a proposal that would see its health records system made opt-out for users.
Earlier this week the report of an inquiry into the the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records scheme was made public, including its recommendation that registration for the system become default.
“We worked with the privacy lobby in the lead up to passing legislation for the PCEHR, which became an opt-in system,” Madden said to the Trans-Tasman Business Circle in Canberra on Thursday.
-----

Mobile vision for telehealth

Cate Swannell
Monday, 19 May, 2014
MOBILE health technologies — mHealth — may be the catalyst that lifts the cost-effective and sustainable implementation of telemedicine, says a telehealth expert.
Professor Sven-Erik Bursell, professor of telehealth at the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre at the University of Sydney, said mobile technologies and health applications were crucial in overcoming “barriers to implementation” of telemedicine highlighted in an article published in the MJA. (1)
The MJA authors, led by Dr Nigel Armfield from the Centre for Online Health at the University of Queensland, wrote that the evidence base for telemedicine was “very limited”, leading to “slow and patchy” implementation.
“There is little incentive to adopt telemedicine, particularly in the absence of clinical and economic evidence”, they wrote. “Analysis before implementation of telemedicine is sometimes insufficient or omitted entirely.”
-----
Written by Renai LeMay on Friday, May 23, 2014 17:50

Report savages NT Govt’s ICT performance

news The Northern Territory’s parliament has published a landmark report into the management of ICT projects by its departments and agencies, finding a similar list of disasters as have been suffered by other state jurisdictions in Australia and recommending the immediate appointment of a whole of government chief information officer to help rectify the systemic issues.
The report, entitled Management of ICT Projects by Government Agencies, is available online in PDF format and was produced by the Public Accounts Committee of the Territory’s Legislative Assembly. It examined three major ICT projects within the Territory — the Department of Corporate and Information Services’ Asset Management System, Power and Water Corporation’s Asset Management Capability Project, and the Department of Health’s Grants Management System. Issues were found with all three.
Of the three projects reviewed for the inquiry, the Department of Infrastructure’s Asset Management System (AMS) project constituted the most significant failure, according to the report.
-----

No co-payments at your online doctor, says Doctus

An Australian-based online medical company, launched last year, is claiming it can provide a way around the government’s proposed co-payment for a visit to the doctor by offering an online doctor’s consultation in the comfort of your home or workplace.
The company – Doctus –  is promoting its so-called ‘revolutionary’ service as offering a convenient, cost effective solution, but only for “simple, low-risk medical conditions.”
Doctus founder and PR graduate from Sydney’s University of Technology – Sarah  Beckwith – and her father and Doctus Medical Director, Dr Rodney Beckwith, say that with routine visits to the doctor now set to cost patients an extra $7 per visit, the cost of healthcare for “routine script renewals and simple medical conditions is set to skyrocket.”
-----

Wearable computer to improve brain health

Date May 18, 2014

Matthew Hall

A former refugee, Young Australian of the Year and a global innovator to watch has turned her talent to help the fight against Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological conditions.
Tan Le is poised to launch a wearable computer to help monitor a user’s brain activity and prompt behavioural changes for long-term benefits.
Named Young Australian of the Year in 1998, Ms Le moved to the United States in 2005 to work on her bioinformatics start-up. Nearly a decade later and her Emotiv Insight headset is set to hit the shelves after raising more than $US1.6 million ($1.7 million) through fund-raising website Kickstarter. Her initial call late last year was for just $100,000 in funding.
“We’re all living longer and we know that once you reach the age of 65 the chances of developing a neurological condition increases and accelerates,” she said. 
-----

Medical board bows to pressure on social media rules

20th May 2014
THE Medical Board of Australia has yielded to pressure from doctors over confusing advertising and social media rules, changing the wording of guidelines relating to unsolicited testimonials.
Two months after the Guidelines for advertising regulated health services were first released, they have been updated to clarify that doctors “are not responsible for removing, or trying to have removed, unsolicited testimonials published on a website or in social media over which they do not have control”. 
In a statement issued on Tuesday, the national boards said they had acted on feedback received about the guidelines, which were first released in March.
-----

Board's final word on social media reviews

23 May, 2014 Paul Smith comments
The labyrinthine saga over whether doctors should be attempting to remove unsolicited reviews of their clinical care on social media seems to have reached an end.
The Medical Board of Australia caused a storm earlier this year after its draft advertising guidelines seemed to suggest doctors would be in breach of the rules if they did not attempt to remove unsolicited posts by patients.
The argument was that these testimonials could be seen as a form of advertising for which doctors could be held responsible.
Those guidelines, after being rewritten and clarified, are now in force. The board said that the rules were not intended to stop the community or patients from discussing their experiences online.
-----

Update on  the 3rd Edition

May 18, 2014
Many people have been asking me about the progress with our re-write of the Guide. My goal is for the completed book to be delivered to the publisher around mid June 2014. So, very soon now. Hopefully you will see the 3rd edition available in electronic or paper formats towards the end of the year.
Notable changes to the book include major updates to most chapters, as well as many new chapters. New chapters will cover topics such as the safety of information technology, social networks and social media, personalised medicine, and consumer informatics. System implementation will be reflected in the text, and the last parts of the book which traditionally have focussed on decision support topics are largely re-written and expanded.
-----

Mind-reading machine takes images from brain

SCIENTISTS have created a mind-reading machine so powerful it can extract images from people’s brains and then display them on a screen for ­others to see. The system has been used to accurately reconstruct human faces based only on data from the brain scanner.
The researchers say the same approach could one day also allow them to reconstruct images from people’s dreams, memories and imagination. Another future application could be to generate images of criminals from the minds of witnesses.
“Our methods yield strikingly accurate neural reconstructions of faces,” said Alan Cowen, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Berkeley.
In the research, the scientists showed six volunteers 300 faces while they lay in an MRI scanner. This process showed how their brains responded to features ranging from blond hair and blue eyes to dark skin and beards.
-----

Qld’s payroll repair man takes over NSW Health IT


Walsh appointed to ‘super-CIO’ role.

The NSW Government has appointed Michael Walsh the inaugural chief executive of its brand new IT agency, eHealth NSW.
Health Minister Jillian Skinner launched the new agency in December last year, which will see IT oversight for the state’s health system split out of HealthShare NSW and installed into a dedicated group.
Walsh effectively takes over the responsibilities left behind by NSW Health’s last permanent CIO Greg Wells, but will work side-by-side with Secretary Mary Foley, reflecting the promotion of IT up the executive food chain in the department.
He now holds responsibility for IT running the country’s largest health system, which employs more than 100,000 staff and cares for 17,500 patients in hospital beds every night.
-----

Wristband aid to help manage Parkinson’s

A MELBOURNE firm is expanding its production of wearable technology designed to help ­Parkinson’s disease sufferers live a better quality of life.
The technology, a wristband called the Parkinson’s Kinetigraph, has a built-in accelerometer like the common one found in smartphones and wearable tech devices such as the Jawbone Up and Fitbit Flex.
The Kinetigraph collects raw movement data which shows the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Clinicians can use the data to finetune medication.
The Melbourne-based Global Kinetics Corporation managing director Andrew Maxwell said the firm had developed two software algorithms that turned the wristband data into information discernible to doctors.
Patients typically wore the ­device for 10 days. It measured the level of “bradykinesia” — the slowness of movement patients experienced at the onset of symptoms. Bradykinesia typically is treated with dopamine replacement therapy.
-----

Telemedicine — is the cart being put before the horse?

Nigel R Armfield, Sisira K Edirippulige, Natalie Bradford and Anthony C Smith
Med J Aust 2014; 200 (9): 530-533.
doi: 10.5694/mja13.11101

Summary

  • A large literature base on telemedicine exists, but the evidence base for telemedicine is very limited. There is little practical or useful information to guide clinicians and health policymakers.
  • Telemedicine is often implemented based on limited or no prior formal analysis of its appropriateness to the circumstances, and adoption of telemedicine by clinicians has been slow and patchy.
  • Formal analysis should be conducted before implementation of telemedicine to identify the patients, conditions and settings that it is likely to benefit.
  • Primary studies of telemedicine tend to be of insufficient quality to enable synthesis of formal evidence.
  • Methods typically used to assess effectiveness in medicine are often difficult, expensive or impractical to apply to telemedicine.
  • Formal studies of telemedicine should examine efficacy, effectiveness, economics and clinician preferences.
  • Successful adoption and sustainable integration of telemedicine into routine care could be improved by evidence-based implementation.
Telemedicine, the use of information and communication technology to deliver clinical services at a distance, although perceived as an innovation, has been discussed in peer-reviewed literature for over 40 years.1 While many articles describe the successes and failures of telemedicine, the evidence base for its use is weak. The common view is that it can benefit patients and clinicians, extending services into places where none previously existed. Here, we reflect on the shortcomings of telemedicine research and implementation, and suggest ways to strengthen the quality of evidence in relation to telemedicine.
-----

New online training helps health professionals deliver best-practice quitting advice

Monday 19 May, 2014
Helping health professionals to incorporate evidence-based brief advice to clients who smoke is the focus of a new online learning hub created by Quit Victoria.
The online training will guide health professionals through the best way to talk to clients across a broad range of settings about quitting. as well as the stages of change, the 5A’s framework and smoking behaviour.
Quit Victoria Cessation, Partnerships and Priority Settings Manager Luke Atkin said health professionals played a vital role in helping smokers to quit but the range of scenarios and attitudes to quitting they faced was broad.
-----

How BASIC opened up computers to all of us

  • Dan Rockmore
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • May 19, 2014 10:10AM
FIFTY years ago, at 4am on May 1, 1964, in the basement of College Hall at Dartmouth College, the world of computing changed forever.
Professor John Kemeny, then the chairman of the mathematics department at Dartmouth and later its president, and Mike Busch, a Dartmouth sophomore, typed “RUN” on a pair of computer terminals to execute two programs on a single industrial-sized General Electric “mainframe” computer.
The programs were written in BASIC (Beginner’s All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code), a fledgling computer language designed for the everyman, by Prof. Kemeny, Professor Tom Kurtz and a team of eager students.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Monday, May 26, 2014

Review Of Reporting Of The Release Of The PCEHR Review. Most Reporting Much Keener On The Report Than I And Other Bloggers Are.

General Comment:

I thought it would be interesting to pull together the articles published since the release of the Review on May 19, 2014
-----

Health Minister backs opt-out PCEHR

Paris Cowan
Software

Royle Review to be released today.

Health Minister Peter Dutton has announced his support for an opt-out personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR), in line with a recommendation of the Government-commissioned review into the system.
At present, the PCEHR is reliant on Australians registering for an account online before their health records can be uploaded and shared amongst their health practitioners. To date this approach has seen only one in 15 Australians sign up.
At the HIMSS Australia conference in Sydney today, Dutton indicated his support for reversing this approach and registering citizens by default.
-----

E-health records should be opt-out: Review

Summary: A report on Australia's personally-controlled e-health record rollout has recommended that patients be signed up to the electronic system by default.
By Josh Taylor | May 19, 2014 -- 07:13 GMT (17:13 AEST)
A review of the rollout of Australia's personally-controlled e-health record (PCEHR) system has recommended that the system sign up patients by default from 2015, unless they decide to opt out.
The review (PDF), which was commissioned by Health Minister Peter Dutton in November last year to examine the rollout of the AU$1 billion system and why so few patients and doctors have signed up to in the years since its launch.
As of February this year, 1.4 million users have signed up for an e-health record.
Although the review was completed in December by UnitingCare Health group executive director Richard Royale, Australian Medical Association president Dr Steve Hambleton, and Australia Post's CIO Andrew Walduck, the minister has sat on the report for six months, and despite attempts to obtain the report under Freedom of Information, the department refused to release the report until today.
There were 38 recommendations made in the report, including renaming the PCEHR to the My Health Record (MyHR) to encourage more people to use the service. The system would become opt-out at the start of 2015, provided the government changes the records to include demographics, current medications, adverse events, discharge summaries, and clinical measurements.
-----

Review recommends new name, direction for PCEHR

Paris Cowan
Software

Opt-out approach, dissolution of NEHTA.

The national personally controlled electronic health record will receive a new name, a new governing authority, usability reforms and revised incentive payments for GPs if the federal government sticks by its intention to act on the majority of recommendations made public yesterday in its review of the scheme.
The three man PCEHR review panel, led by UnitingHealth chief Richard Royle with the Australian Medical Association’s Steve Hambleton and AusPost CIO Andrew Walduck, found that while an electronic health record remains a critical part of the future health infrastructure for Australia, it requires “intervention and correction”.
Their re-imagining of the PCEHR - now likely to be known as My Health Record, or MyHR for short - includes the absence of the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA) and a potential operation independent of the Commonwealth purse.
-----

Health record review recommends electronic system automatically upload private medical history

  • May 19, 2014 10:00PM
  • By Sue Dunlevy National Health Writer
  • News Corp Australia Network
AUSTRALIANS would be signed up to an e-health record by default and have to opt-out if they wanted to keep private information about abortions and mental health issues under sweeping changes to the program.
A government review of the scheme, a $1 billion white elephant that isn’t being used by doctors, also wants to rename the Personally Controlled e-Health Record to the “My Health Record”.
Patients would still retain control over the record but doctors would be automatically notified if a patients restricted or deleted a document in it so they could challenge the patient and explain the clinical impact of the removal of important information.
-----

E-health record should be opt-out: Review

PCEHR should be renamed 'MyHR'
Rohan Pearce (Computerworld) on 19 May, 2014 16:31
The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) should be renamed 'My Health Record' — MyHR — and shift to an opt-out model, according to a review of the system commissioned by the federal health minister, Peter Dutton.
The review was conducted last year and completed in December but not released by the Department of Health until now. The review was led by Richard Royle, executive director of the UnitingCare Health group in Queensland and vice-president of the Australian Private Hospitals Association. The other members of the group who conducted the review were AMA chief Dr Steve Hambleton and Australia Post CIO Andrew Walduck.
The report (PDF) concludes that there is overwhelming support for an electronic health record system in Australia but a "change in approach however is needed to correct early implementation issues and to review the strategy and role that a shared electronic health record plays in a broader system of health care".
-----

Rename PCHER, drop Nehta: review

THE Abbott government has been advised to make the troubled $1 billion personally controlled e-health record system an ‘opt-out’ model while the National E-health Transition Authority should be abolished as part of a long-awaited review into the PCEHR.
They were part of 38 recommendations were made by a panel led by UnitingCare Health Queensland chief Richard Royle. The review was announced in November by Health Minister Peter Dutton and delivered to him in December.
The publication of the review was previously suppressed by the Department of Health.
The PCEHR should be renamed My Health Record (MyHR) and Nehta replaced with the Australian Commission for Electronic Health (ACeH) reporting directly to the Standing Council on Health (SCoH), the review said.
-----

My Health Record bumps off unpopular PCEHR

20th May 2014
ELECTRONIC health records will be created for each Australian by January under an opt-out model to replace the unpopular personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR), under a blueprint released by Health Minister Peter Dutton.
A review of the PCEHR undertaken in 2013 has come up with 38 recommendations to tackle shortcomings and make electronic records more effective for doctors and patients, with doctors to be given an extra push to use the system through the ePractice Incentive Payment (ePIP).
“It’s clear many of the existing problems with the PCEHR system stem from the rushed early implementation," Mr Dutton said after the report’s release. 
The report is understood to have been with the minister since December.
-----

The PCEHR Review, and the “Minimum Composite of Records”

Posted on May 20, 2014 by Grahame Grieve
So the PCEHR review has finally been released, and I’ve been reading with considerable interest. I’m going to stick to analysing the technical recommendations that they make, starting with a group of recommendations they call the “Minimum Composite of Records”:
19. Expand the existing Australian Medications Terminologies (AMT) data set to include a set of over the counter (OTC) medicines.
20. Widen the existing National Prescribing and Dispensing Repository (NPDR) to include the expanded set of over the counter (OTC) medicines.
21. Implement a minimum composite of records to allow transition to an opt-out model by a target date of 1st January 2015 inline with recommendation 13. This will dramatically improve the value proposition for clinicians to regularly turn to the MyHR, which must initially include:
  • Demographics
  • Current Medications and Adverse Events
  • Discharge summaries
  • Clinical Measurements
-----

Total revamp of E-health proposed

21 May, 2014 Chris Brooker
The long-awaited Federal Government E-health review has recommended switching to an ‘opt out’ system, as well as expanding the national prescribing database to include OTC medicines.
This follows comments from a number of interest groups complaining that the existing ‘opt in’ method was slowing uptake of the Personally Controlled Electronic health Record (PCEHR).   
The report, released this week after a Freedom of Information request (the report was submitted to the Government in December 2013), also advocates expanding the National Prescribing and Dispensing Repository (NPDR) to include an expanded set of OTC medicines.
“The NPDR should be expanded to include a set of OTC medicines to improve its utility,” the report said. “At present one of the subsidies that is available to the pharmacist depends on whether the first script was dispensed electronically. To increase the rate of adoption this issue needs to be addressed”.   
-----

Health Record Review promises private revolution

A new Australian Commission of Electronic Health - ACeH – is likely to be set up to manage the co-ordination and implementation of Australia’s national electronic health record, if Health Minister Peter Dutton takes up key recommendations from the 90-page Review of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record, released last week.
The recommendations, which include switching to an opt-out system and decentralising information across multiple data respositories, followed over 80 submissions and resulted from terms of review covering usability issues, barriers to adoption and the future role of the private sector in providing solutions.
Richard Royle, who chaired the review panel, says that compiling such a comprehensive review in just six weeks was a substantial task for the panel.
-----

PCEHR review recommends Opt Out

The much awaited report from the review of the PCEHR (provided to Government in December 2013) has been released by Minister for Health and Sport, The Hon Peter Dutton in Sydney.
Carried out by a panel chaired by Richard Royle, Executive Director UnitingCare Health the report identifies the major concerns provided via over 200 submissions, interviews and some unsolicited feedback, and goes on to provide 38 recommendations that are expected to provoke discussion.
Speaking at the HIMSS AsiaPac Aus14 meeting, his first public eHealth engagement, the Minister clearly demonstrated the government’s intent to support eHealth ongoing – recognising that eHealth is now ubiquitous in health care delivery.
The Minister referred to several key recommendations including strengthened governance of eHealth more broadly including “crystal clear” accountabilities; to adopt an opt-out model (which the Minister personally supports); improving clinical usability of the record to increase clinician acceptance and adoption; and how the PCEHR is structured to hold personal, sensitive information.
-----

Health CIO expects 'strong views' on opt-out PCEHR

John Hilvert

Outsourcing RFT due this month.

Federal health CIO Paul Madden expects some “strong and sharp” views from various interest groups this year, as the government consults on a proposal that would see its health records system made opt-out for users.
Earlier this week the report of an inquiry into the the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records scheme was made public, including its recommendation that registration for the system become default.
“We worked with the privacy lobby in the lead up to passing legislation for the PCEHR, which became an opt-in system,” Madden said to the Trans-Tasman Business Circle in Canberra on Thursday.
However there were also contrary calls just before the law was passed, led by medical associations, to ensure that opt-out remain on the agenda.
-----

Review proposes radical eHealth overhaul

By Australian Ageing Agenda on May 23, 2014 in Technology
By Julian Bajkowski
A top level review of Australia’s decade-long pursuit of a functional electronic health and medical records system, and its builder the National eHealth Transition Authority (NeHTA) has recommended that the key body be scrapped and its functions sent to a new Commission specially set up to deal with the rollout and management of the new system.
Quietly published on Monday by the federal Department of Health, the review is a cornerstone document that sets out recommendations to new Health Minister Peter Dutton on how to take the frustrated scheme forward.
Its core recommendation is that NeHTA be shut down and replaced by an Australian Commission for Electronic Health that reports directly to the Standing Council on Health.
That recommendation follows the Abbott government grudgingly tipping another $140 million into the ailing PCEHR to keep it on life support before it undergoes radical surgery.
-----

GPs face MBS item revamp to save the PCEHR

22 May, 2014 Paul Smith
Breathing life into the moribund PCEHR could see GPs required to upload information from care plans and health assessments onto the system.
This week finally saw the release of the Federal Government's PCEHR review.
It makes a string of recommendations including calls for the system to become opt-out from January 2015, with patients having to formally refuse to take part.
The review also suggests renaming the scheme My Health Record, abbreviated to MyHR.
-----

The Australasian College of Health Informatics welcomes the Release of the PCEHR Review.

PRESS RELEASE: 22nd May 2014
The Australasian College of Health Informatics (ACHI) welcomes the release of the report of the review into the PCEHR, Australia's national electronic health record system.  The release of the report in addition to the budget announcement of continued PCEHR funding provides greater clarity to the immediate future of the PCEHR.
The College believes that a change of the PCEHR consent model to ‘opt-out’ whilst preserving the existing patient controls would be a welcome move to increase adoption, and enhance the usefulness of the PCEHR for patients, consumers and clinicians.
-----
Written by Renai LeMay on Monday, May 19, 2014 16:28

PCEHR review recommends NEHTA be ‘dissolved’

news Following a protracted Freedom of Information battle, the Federal Government has finally released a report into the the troubled Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records (PCEHR) project, with one of the document’s main recommendations being that the National e-Health Transition Authority be ‘dissolved’ due to governance issues.
The PCEHR project was initially funded in the 2010 Federal Budget to the tune of $466.7 million after years of health industry and technology experts calling for development and national leadership in e-health and health identifier technology to better tie together patients’ records and achieve clinical outcomes. The project has been overseen by the Department of Health in coalition with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA).
However, the project has been reported to have suffered extensive problems and has suffered from poor uptake by medical facilities and the public. Due to the issues, on 4 November new Coalition Health Minister Peter Dutton kicked off a promised review of the PCEHR project.
In last week’s Federal Budget, the Government gave one of its first signals that it had opted to continue to progress the project for now, allocating funding of $140.6 million to the project over the next 12 months while it decides its ultimate fate. Following a protracted Freedom of Information battle since January, the PCEHR review was released today. It is available online in full in PDF format.
-----

eHealth on the move again

Portability, versatility and increasing computer performance of tablets are bringing completely new experiences, changing how we enjoy entertainment, shop, gather information, communicate and blend our digital and real worlds.
Their use in health systems in the US is being taken up by the patients themselves who want to control as much of their treatments as they can, as a means of containing their health bills.
Thus mHealth (mobile health) was born which shows the promise of flexibility and versatility and lower development costs because patients bear most of the up-front costs
As this article was being written the Australian government budget was being delivered which contained (among other “nasties”) a $7 co-payment for all doctor visits for all patients. This would be unsustainable for the majority patients (seniors) given also that the value of pensions will also erode over time.
The current model simply has to be re-invented and made more cost effective.
-----

Forcing MyHR (aka the PCEHR) down our throats

Posted on by Thinus
It is well known that our Practice is ready and able to use the PCEHR but that we are unwilling to proceed with this given numerous concerns with the current system.
Yesterday the Health Minister announced a set of changes that is being implemented – some of these are extremely concerning.
-----

E-health scheme to be revived after panel review

John Kerin and Joanna Heath
There are two reasons why the Abbott government is persisting with a scheme to provide Australians with personally controlled electronic health records, even though it has been labelled a white elephant and a flop: the long-term promises of improving the budget bottom line, and saving lives.
An independent review of the scheme released this week found that despite the outlay of $1 billion since its introduction by former Labor health minister Nicola Roxon in 2012, health users have not signed up in sufficient numbers, and that the probable flaw is that users have to opt in to the system.
Among a host of other shortcomings are the lack of consultation with the medical profession in the initial design, and an unfriendly usability which deterred busy medical professionals from loading health details onto the patient files of the million or so people who have signed up. The name doesn’t help either: Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record or PCEHR.
The review points out that moving ­medicine online offers savings of up to $7 billion a year through fewer diagnosis, treatment and prescription errors, which would avoid thousands of unnecessary hospital admissions.
-----
What is missing for me in all this is scepticism regarding just how practical and implementable these proposals are in many of the articles and just how credible the claims for benefits are.
I find it interesting that the bloggers cited above are taking a more sceptical view - as I did - than the main steam or technical journalists who seem to rather accept just what the review says uncritically.
Horses for courses I guess.
David.