Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, June 07, 2014

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 7th June, 2014.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

Time for hard HITECH reboot

Posted on May 29, 2014
By John W. Loonsk, MD, CMIO, CGI and Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health IT
So, you dropped a huge chunk of change on a new IT system. Now you are frustrated and have buyer’s regret. The “installation requirements” are very complex. And although you just bought it, the system already needs to be updated. It only seems to run one application – “EHR version 1.0,” but you want to do many other things too. EHR v1 is not very user friendly and sure makes you do your work differently. And there is more. This expensive new system doesn’t seem to connect to anything. Sure, there is a basic email application available, but you also want to look for information and get what you need when and where you need it. Isn’t that what the Internet enabled years ago?
If this is the metaphorical world of HITECH, here’s to giving Karen DeSalvo, the new national coordinator for Health IT, all the support she needs to do a full and hard HITECH reboot. More than 30 billion dollars have been spent. And while it is reasonable that many HIT outcomes are still unfulfilled, the path forward seems murky. EHR adoption has surged, but much of what has been broken about health IT in the United States still remains. And the leverage of the HITECH funds is dwindling fast.
Now there is yet another independent report, this time from the JASON group which, like the report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology before it, suggests the need for a major architecting effort for health IT nationally. The Government Accountability Office reports that there is a lack of strategy, prioritized actions, and milestones in HITECH. HIT interoperability is recognized as being limited at multiple levels. And resultantly, the benefits of HIT that depend on a combination of adoption, interoperability, and health information exchange as table stakes are elusive.
-----

CEO resigns amid troubled EHR rollout

Posted on May 30, 2014
By Erin McCann, Associate Editor
A system-wide EHR rollout is no walk in the park. With poor management and implementation plans, it can sap worker morale and deter long-term success. This appears to be what has transpired this week at the Athens Regional Health System in Georgia after staff unanimously voted "no confidence" for the system's CEO, who has effectively announced his resignation. 
Staff and clinicians of the health system had reportedly expressed several concerns over the "aggressive" rollout of its Cerner electronic health record system, which started beginning of May, according to a report in the Banner-Herald. The report cited a letter sent to CEO James Thaw, signed by more than a dozen clinicians, recounting cases of medication errors, misplaced orders, "emergency department patients leaving after long waits; and of an inpatient who wasn't seen by a physician for (five) days."
-----

Docs' views of EHRs sharply divided

May 27, 2014 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
Doctors' opinions of electronic health records vary significantly, in large part based on their personal experiences, according to a new article in Medscape Business of Medicine.
It then expressed surprise at the contrasting views that physicians actually hold regarding the systems, evaluating 700 comments made by physicians and other providers to other recent Medscape articles.  
-----

Practice Fusion creates national healthcare database

May 28, 2014 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
San Francisco-based Practice Fusion has launched a new national real-time healthcare database, comprised of a de-identified subset of more than 81 million electronic patient records. The tool, called Insight, is the nation's largest such database, according to Practice Fusion.
-----

CDC: Only 18% of office-based docs may meet Meaningful Use

May 25, 2014 | By Marla Durben Hirsch
The number of office-based physicians using electronic health records continues to rise, but only 18 percent of them may be eligible for Meaningful Use incentives, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's latest National Health Statistics Report.
In 2012, 71.8 percent of office-based physicians were using any type of EHR system, according to the report, up from 34.5 percent in 2007. Almost one-fourth, 23.5 percent, had a system with features meeting the criteria of being "fully functional" in 2012, up from 3.8 percent in 2007.
There was also a difference in adoption of a fully functional system between physicians in practices of 11 or more doctors compared to solo practitioners; the gap between the two jumped from 10.4 percent in 2007 to 30.6 percent in 2012.
-----

Are You Measuring Your Security Program’s Effectiveness?

MAY 28, 2014 1:49pm ET
The old adage, "You can't manage what you don't measure," still applies--and even more so today with healthcare organizations facing a number of external and internal security challenges.
Externally, breach announcements seem to make the weekly news cycle bringing information security issues to the forefront of public awareness. Federal regulations designed to protect patient information are now being actively enforced. Growth in technology and the electronic health record continues to integrate into the delivery of healthcare.
Internally, the job of providing security is complicated by a variety of pressures, including the difficulty of managing competing priorities with limited resources, such as conducting incident investigations vs. implementing encryption on mobile devices.
-----

Online Course: Health Informatics 101

Description: 
This 40-hour, 8-week, online training program was designed to provide both clinical and non-clinical staff with a common foundation in Health IT to advance health informatics in large healthcare organizations. The training program will enhance competencies in health information technology, particularly for the design, configuration, use, and maintenance of informatics interventions that improve health care delivery.
-----

Online Training: Health IT Foundations for IT Professionals Certificate Program

Description: 
This Health Information Technology certificate program is composed of three courses, each 11-12 weeks in length. They include Healthcare Fundamentals (55 hours), Health IT Data Standards (55 hours), and Health IT Application (55 hours). The purpose of the program is to provide experienced IT professionals with the knowledge and skills they need to transition to a healthcare environment. Successful participants typically also have some higher education experience.
-----

Is Electronic Charting Less Efficient Than Paper Charting?

Daniel J. Pallin, MD, MPH reviewing Ward MJ et al. Ann Emerg Med 2014 Jun.
Operational performance was similar before and after computerization at 23 community emergency departments.
The federal government has provided $17 billion in incentives to computerize healthcare. The potential benefits include improved error checking, decision support, better billing, and more data for research. However, some research has suggested that going paperless adversely affects productivity.
-----

Physicians, Hospitals Size Up Value-Based Healthcare

5/29/2014 09:06 AM
Physicians are wary of new healthcare payment models emphasizing quality and efficiency metrics, but hospitals are likely to prove resilient.
Many healthcare providers now participate in value-based payment models, which most see as the wave of the future, but few of them are happy about it.
"Value-based" is a catch-all label for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and other ways of restructuring healthcare around payment for value delivered, as measured by metrics of healthcare quality or the aggregate health of a population rather than by the volume of visits, procedures, or hospital stays a healthcare organization records. In other words, it's a highly data-driven vision of healthcare reform, intended to improve quality and efficiency while reducing costs.
-----
  • May 28, 2014, 7:30 AM ET

Report: Health-Care Sector Ranks Below Retail in Cybersecurity

The health-care sector is the worst-performing industry in terms of cybersecurity according to a new study released Wednesday. The report, conducted by startup BitSight Technologies, found the industry plagued by a high number of security incidents and slow response times to those events. But health care’s woes don’t translate to immunity for other industries. A separate cybercrime report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers and CSO Magazine, found risky security behavior rampant in companies throughout all industries.
The BitSight report looked at four industries – financial services, utilities, retail and health care, including pharmaceutical – within the S&P 500 Index. BitSight issues cybersecurity ratings on companies that are similar to consumer credit scores, ranging from 250 to 900. The financial services industry with the highest median score of 782 indicates a better security posture than health care, which earned a median score of 670.
-----

Virtual Sepsis Unit Aids Early Detection

by David Wild
A “virtual sepsis unit,” constructed from ones and zeros, may help speed the identification of severe sepsis or septic shock in patients outside the ICU, new findings suggest.
During a three-month pilot study conducted at Mercy Hospital St. Louis, in Missouri, the telemedicine-based system identified all hospitalized patients who developed the complication, according to the researchers, who presented the findings at the 2014 annual meeting of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (poster 1026).
Brian M. Fuller, MD, a sepsis expert who was not involved in the study, called the system “striking in its accuracy and in its ability to promptly detect patients. Electronic screening aids such as this could have a very positive impact, especially given the increasing number of sepsis patients, the abundance of data that clinicians are asked to interpret on a daily basis and the unacceptably high mortality rates for sepsis,” said Dr. Fuller, assistant professor of anesthesiology and emergency medicine in the Department of Anesthesiology at Washington University School of Medicine, in St. Louis.
-----

ONC realigns organizational structure

May 30, 2014 | By Dan Bowman
National Coordinator for Health IT Karen DeSalvo, in an internal memo sent to ONC staffers and emailed to FierceHealthIT late Friday, announced a slew of organizational changes at the agency. The changes also are set to appear in the Federal Register on June 3.
DeSalvo said the changes will enable ONC to better meet the needs of the future, saying that the realignment will improve effectiveness by "combining similar functions, elevating critical priority functions and providing a flatter and more accountable reporting structure."
-----

PCAST report calls on HHS to develop national health data infrastructure

May 30, 2014 | By Dan Bowman
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services must lead efforts to develop a "robust" national health information infrastructure via provider adoption of interoperable electronic health records, according to a new report from the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).
The report, published May 29, calls for better systems engineering to improve the U.S. healthcare system and makes several recommendations, including:
  • Accelerating the alignment of payment incentives and reported information with better outcomes for individuals and populations
  • Providing national leadership in systems engineering by increasing the supply of data available to benchmark performance and examine more broad regional or national trends
  • Increasing technical assistance to providers and communities in applying systems approaches
-----

Systems reengineering to improve care

Posted on May 30, 2014
By Mike Miliard, Managing Editor
A strategy most often applied to industries such as manufacturing and aviation might unlock the potential for better care at lower cost, according to a new report from the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
Systems engineering, common in other sectors of the economy, is an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing, designing and managing complex systems, with the aim of improving their efficiency, reliability and productivity.
For example, the PCAST report, "Better Health Care and Lower Costs: Accelerating Improvement Through Systems Engineering," points out that, "by using tools such as alerts, redundancies, checklists, and systems that adjust for the human factor, U.S. commercial airlines have reduced fatalities from hundreds in the 1960s to approaching zero now, with the risk of dying now at 1 in 45 million flights. They have also been used in fields as diverse as manufacturing, space stations and satellites, and education."
-----

Insider access to patient data top worry

Posted on May 29, 2014
By Bernie Monegain, Editor
Identity management and unauthorized data access by employees present the biggest threat to security and privacy of patient data, according to healthcare providers across the country.
Researchers from Orem, Utah-based KLAS  spoke with 106 providers to find out where they felt the most at risk for breaches and to see which third-party firms they were turning to for assistance.
The results are detailed in a new KLAS report, "Security and Privacy Perception 2014: High Stakes, Big Challenges," and they seem to line up with the findings in a recent healthcare security report from Verizon, which indicated that theft and loss of unencrypted devices were among the biggest security problems in healthcare.
The Verizon report revealed that the healthcare sector also recorded its second highest numbers for insider misuse, with 15 percent of healthcare security incidences attributed to insider misuse – higher than 13 other industries.
-----

InterSystems shakes up the EPR market

InterSystems’ recent wins on Teeside and in the South of England mark a significant shift in the supplier market, argues EHI editor Jon Hoeksma.
29 May 2014
The selection of InterSystems’ TrakCare by three trusts in the South of England marks a major shift in the supplier landscape for electronic patient records.
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, and Yeovil District Hospital NHD Foundation Trust, known as the SmartCare consortium, will replace their legacy EDS Swift and Cerner systems with an integrated, remotely-hosted clinical information system from the company.
The win is the second for InterSystems in a few weeks. In February, it was announced that North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation trust had signed a contract for TrakCare, which it described as a new patient administration and electronic patient record system and a replacement for its 26 year-old iExpress PAS.   
The two wins inject some much needed, additional choice into the hospital supplier landscape, which has been moribund in the South since the wheels came of the National Programme for IT with Fujitsu’s exit as local service provider in 2008, and which is still dominated by the remains of the CSC LSP deal in the North, Midlands and East.
They also make InterSystems one of the leading, new market entrant EPR suppliers in the English NHS market, joining a pack that includes Oasis, Silverlink, IMS Maxims, Cambio, Meditech, Allscripts and Epic in aiming to challenge the current market leaders CSC, Cerner and McKesson.
-----

South acute group picks InterSystems

29 May 2014   Sam Sachdeva
A group of three acute trusts in the South Local Clinical Systems programme have chosen InterSystems to provide them with a clinical information system worth up to £60m.
The collaboration of Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust and Yeovil District Hospital NHD Foundation Trust, known as SmartCare, chose InterSystems’ TrakCare from a shortlist of three suppliers.
In a statement, a Gloucestershire Hospitals spokesman told EHI that TrakCare had been chosen as the preferred supplier following a “thorough and detailed” procurement process.
-----

Healthcare IT Security Worse Than Retail, Study Says

5/28/2014 08:00 AM
Bad news for healthcare community: New study shows retailers like Target and eBay are more secure than many healthcare organizations.
Healthcare organizations are rife with insecurity, and it's only a question of when a Target-like attack puts millions of patient health information (PHI) files on the black market, a new study suggests.
A large-scale attack within the healthcare industry could put patients' safety and lives at stake, cautioned Stephen Boyer, CTO of security rating firm BitSight Technology, in an interview. Despite increasing awareness about these risks, healthcare organizations far behind their peers in other vertical markets, Boyer said, citing a BitSight study titled Will Healthcare Be the Next Retail?, released May 28.
Of four industries the study analyzed, healthcare saw the largest surge in attacks and was slowest to respond, taking more than five days to remediate security issues. By comparison, finance took about 3.5 days, and retail and utilities combatted issues within approximately four days. Some healthcare organizations led the market, using best practices and adequate resources, but as a sector, healthcare is weaker than others.
-----

Mayo's tricks of the trade for portals

Posted on May 28, 2014
By Erin McCann, Associate Editor
Working on the patient portal portion of Stage 2 meaningful use? Officials at Mayo Clinic can offer some valuable insight into their own portal rollout – challenges that have arisen, privacy concerns and how to do it right. 
Enterprise-wide, Mayo Clinic, with locations in Rochester, Minn.; Jacksonville, Fla.; and Scottsdale, Ariz., has more than 400,000 patients who now have online portal accounts (the clinic sees some 1.1 million unique patients each year.) 
"In terms of the view, download and transmit, we think that we'll be doing well from that perspective," said Mark Parkulo, MD, vice chair, meaningful use coordinating group, who will be speaking at the HIMSS Media/Healthcare IT News Privacy and Security Forum June 16 in San Diego.
-----

Physician Email Notification System Improves Patient Care

Greg Goth
MAY 27, 2014 9:08am ET
Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Partners Healthcare in Boston have discovered that notifying a patient's physicians of the results of tests pending at discharge can markedly improve physician awareness of patient status and improve care.
"Physician awareness of the results of tests pending at discharge (TPADs) is poor," according to researchers in an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. "We developed an automated system that notifies responsible physicians of TPAD results via secure, network email. We sought to evaluate the impact of this system on self-reported awareness of TPAD results by responsible physicians, a necessary intermediary step to improve management of TPAD results."
-----

Cost benefits

Monitor is continuing to push for the introduction of patient level information and costing systems. But are trusts responding? Would a focus on outcomes be a better idea? And are trusts that have PLICS seeing the benefits? Jennifer Trueland investigates.
According to Monitor, the healthcare sector is at a critical stage in the development of costing.
Understanding the real cost of patient care is crucial, the regulator says, and accurate costing has the potential to deliver higher quality care to patients and better value to the NHS.
Monitor, which along with NHS England, is responsible for the pricing of NHS services in England, is partly pinning its hopes on patient level information and costing systems, or PLICS.
Calling the data collected via PLICS “a rich source of information that could be very valuable for pricing purposes”, the regulator hopes, in the long term, to be able to collect patient level cost data from all providers.
-----

3 mistakes that cause health IT hazards

May 27, 2014 | By Dan Bowman
While health technology--including electronic health records--no doubt has the potential to streamline and improve patient care, providers must proceed with caution when using the latest clinical innovations. A recent Health Data Management article outlines several examples of how such tools can turn hazardous.
Here are three:
1. Faulty implementation: Last fall, an advisory from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority reported that design and implementation problems accounted for errors connected with improper use of default values for medication order sets in more than 300 EHRs. Erin Sparnon, a senior patient safety analyst with ECRI--which published the advisory--told Health Data Management that hazards often occur due to "a misalignment between system configuration and clinician workflows."
-----

Big data lacks demonstrated 'real-world' value

May 28, 2014 | By Susan D. Hall
Big data will not reduce costs or improve care unless the industry overcomes challenges around standards and methods, according to a report from the national health policy institute Network for Excellence in Health Innovation (NEHI).
"Big Data has not ... addressed the dilemma of how our healthcare system can allow for real-world demonstration of the value of innovations while controlling costs," Thomas E. Hubbard, principal author and vice president of policy research at NEHI, said in an announcement.
-----

10 Mistakes to Avoid When Using EHRs

Written by Anuja Vaidya | May 27, 2014
While electronic health record design flaws exist, individual physicians and their practices also often make mistakes that can add to the frustration of working with EHRs, according to a Medscape Business of Medicine report.
Here are the 10 biggest mistakes that physicians make when using EHRs:
1. Purchasing an EHR without making a site visit to a similar practice using the same EHR.
2. Signing an unvetted contract.
-----

Cardiac Practice Guidelines Have High Turnover

Published: May 27, 2014 | Updated: May 28, 2014
By Salynn Boyles, Contributing Writer, MedPage Today
Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN, Nurse Planner

Action Points

  • One in five cardiology class I clinical practice guidelines published since the late 1990s have been downgraded, reversed, or omitted.
  • Point out that after accounting for guideline-level factors, the probability of being downgraded, reversed, or omitted was three times greater for recommendations based on opinion or on one trial or observational data versus recommendations based on multiple trials.
One in five cardiology class I clinical practice guidelines published since the late 1990s have been downgraded, reversed, or omitted, with recommendations not supported by strong clinical trial evidence the most likely to get the axe, an analysis of more than 600 guidelines found.
Among recommendations with available information on level of evidence, 90.5% (95% CI 83.2%-95.3%) supported by multiple randomized studies were retained versus 81% (95%CI 74.8%-86.3%) supported by one randomized trial or observational data, and 73.7% (95% CI, 65.8%-80.5%) supported by opinion (P=0.001), wrote Mark D. Neuman, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and colleagues, in the May 28 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
-----

Nurses' union knocks EHRs hard

Posted on May 27, 2014
By Bernie Monegain, Editor
National Nurses United, which bills itself as the largest organization of nurses in the country, is in the midst of a campaign to spotlight the potential risks of patient harm spurred by what the group calls, "an unchecked proliferation of unproven medical technology and sharp erosion of care standards."
Founded in 2009, the NNU tallies 185,000 members, with members in every state.
The NNU campaign, announced on May 13, includes radio ads from coast to coast, video, social media, legislation, rallies and a call for public action. Its slogan: "When it matters most, insist on a registered nurse."
In its press statement launching the campaign, the NNU questioned the use of EHRs – and other medical technology.
-----

West Cornwall to pilot record sharing

27 May 2014   Sam Sachdeva
Cornwall GPs will share patient data with A&E and out-of-hours services
Eight practices in West Cornwall will pilot a data sharing scheme using Microtest’s Guru to allow local A&E clinicians and the local out-of-hours GP service with access to patients’ GP records.
Penzance GP Dr Matthew Boulter, who is leading the project on behalf of NHS Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group, said the pilot comes from GPs’ frustrations at their patients being unnecessarily admitted to hospital due to a lack of information sharing.
“A GP puts in place what we thought were pretty detailed plans to avoid admittance, only to find out they’ve been admitted because the admitting physician didn’t know about the plans, and had no way to find out.”
-----

Texting aids adolescents in chronic disease management

May 26, 2014 | By Judy Mottl
Texting helped teenage chronic disease patients to be more efficient in managing their condition, according to new research out of the University of California, San Diego.
For the study, researchers examined 81 adolescents with chronic disease, ages 12 to 20 years, over the course of eight months. The participants participated in an intensive web-based and text intervention program, in which they were given disease management and skill-based intervention, as well as access via the mobile text program to a healthcare team.
The results indicated that teens using text messaging took a more active role in their care, communicated more with caregivers and were better equipped to transition from pediatric to adult-oriented healthcare systems.
-----

Addressing Social Determinants of Health Key to Improving Health, Health Care

by Leonard Kish and Cyndy Nayer Tuesday, May 27, 2014
We hear a lot about the economic drain of health care, but what we may be seeing is the actual confirmation of the economic power in providing health care. In economic terms, there's a very high opportunity cost to sickness and death. Preventing them can return dividends for society in real economic terms.
We learned more about how access to health insurance and health care can benefit well-being as a whole with a recent Annals of Internal Medicine study of the Massachusetts health care system -- the system on which the Affordable Care Act was based.
Between 2000 and 2010, mortalities decreased by 3% among Massachusetts residents ages 20 to 64, prime working ages in the U.S., after the health plan was implemented. (The study was controlled by comparing the state with similar counties outside of Massachusetts).
-----

HIT Development is Tough Work. So What?

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , May 27, 2014

Why is it that so few healthcare providers take information technology software and services vendors to court when projects run late, yield incomplete results, or fall below the assurances of a contract?

When car repairs go poorly, customers can and do regularly sue auto mechanics. When surgical procedures go poorly, patients or their families can and do sue surgeons and hospitals. It happens all the time.
Given that software development and deployment is so much more complex than fixing a car or even doing an appendectomy, why is it that so few healthcare providers (or corporate IT customers in general) take software and services vendors to court when projects run late, or yield incomplete results, or fall below the assurances of a contract?
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, June 06, 2014

Is This A Great Use Of Big Data In Emergency Situations Or A Huge Privacy Violation?

This appeared recently in the New York Times.

U.S. Mines Personal Health Data to Find the Vulnerable in Emergencies

The phone calls were part Big Brother, part benevolent parent. When a rare ice storm threatened New Orleans in January, some residents heard from a city official who had gained access to their private medical information. Kidney dialysis patients were advised to seek early treatment because clinics would be closing. Others who rely on breathing machines at home were told how to find help if the power went out.
Those warnings resulted from vast volumes of government data. For the first time, federal officials scoured Medicare health insurance claims to identify potentially vulnerable people and share their names with local public health authorities for outreach during emergencies and disaster drills.
The program is just one of a growing number of public and corporate efforts to take health information far beyond the doctor’s office, offering the promise of better care but also raising concerns about patient privacy.
In some cities, text messages remind parents to get their children vaccinated. Elsewhere, emergency medical services sift records to identify — sometimes to law enforcement officials — “frequent fliers” who take repeated, costly ambulance trips. In New Orleans, a health care information exchange notifies primary care physicians when their patients are admitted to hospitals, offers insurers the ability to sift the data for “high-cost users” and permits authorized individuals to “break the glass” in emergencies — viewing records of patients who have not previously given permission and cannot speak for themselves. And a federal program allows data sharing with public health officials to monitor “mental health conditions” and other illnesses in hazardous situations, like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
The health officials’ intention was to be more proactive in finding vulnerable people like those who suffered and died in disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Sandy. When government teams knocked on doors last year to verify the data and gauge reactions, nearly all the residents allowed them in. Only those who asked how they were found were told.
About a dozen advocates for people with disabilities who were briefed by officials generally expressed support and appreciation of the concern for their community’s needs in emergencies.
There is a great deal more here:
I have to say to me this seems like a pretty good idea. What do others think?
David.

Yet Again We See Pursuit Of the Prefect Get in The Way Of Major Good in E-Health.

This article appeared a little while ago.

Quit Dreaming About Interoperability and Focus on Enterprise Systems Integration

by Shahid N. Shah Wednesday, May 14, 2014
No health IT system or solution can stand alone; for an innovation to be truly useful in a modern clinical or medical environment it must be able to connect to enterprise systems such as electronic health record systems, hospital information systems, practice management systems or numerous other "legacy" environments. On Wednesday, May 14, I will be in Brooklyn, N.Y., at HxRefactored presenting a deep, practical and actionable lecture about what the challenges are to legacy systems integration and how to overcome them without going into the full-time services business. This Perspective is a preview of that presentation.
The need for and attention to interoperability in health care is palpable -- more and more vendors talk about, and even more customers complain about, how it's missing from products. Service vendors are struggling to make it happen and even the government is joining the chorus to help. However, interoperability is too grand a vision in a fragmented and enormous industry the size of health care. What we need to focus more on is basic blocking and tackling around systems integration, not the nirvana of full interoperability.

Health Care Systems Enterprise Integration Patterns

The bad news is that fluid health care data interoperability -- the simple, easy, self-service (by users of EHRs) movement of structured or unstructured from one system to another -- is almost non-existent today. The good news is that the lack of fluid data interoperability doesn't need to hold us back because we can start with basic principles of enterprise integration by reviewing and implementing the patterns in CommonWell and Carequality as good starting points. Notice I said patterns and principles of integration because that is what these two interoperability initiatives are – and that's a good thing.
When we move away from one-size-fits-all bloviating marketing documents to patterns of engineering and real specifications, we're making real progress that creates lasting value. Right now CommonWell has a specification that you can read and follow, but Carequality does not (which means Carequality isn't actually a real option). But, to be fair, Carequality is a new initiative and should be coming out with something -- even CommonWell took about a year to create their specs. If you can't wait, though, start with CommonWell – it's a very good start and should improve over time.
Much, much more here:
There is a great deal of sense in this and it is good the basic ideas of keeping it simple and getting on with the doable are well and truly catching on!
David.

Thursday, June 05, 2014

There Are Some Worrying Signs That The US Meaningful Use Program May Have Overreached In Complexity.

This appeared a little while ago.

Dr. Halamka’s Dramatic MU Prediction in Boston

May 13, 2014
John Halamka, M.D. predicted on May 13 that 80 percent of U.S. hospitals would fail to attest to MU Stage 2 on time
John Halamka, M.D., the CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston, has never shied away from speaking out on issues he has an interest in, nor from controversy. And in his keynote address at the Boston Health IT Summit, sponsored by the Institute for Health Technology Transformation, or iHT2 (which since December 2013 has been in partnership with Healthcare Informatics through its parent company, the Vendome Group LLC), Dr. Halamka was blunt and straightforward in his comments on Tuesday morning, May 13.
Dr. Halamka spent the overwhelming portion of his time in his speech to the audience assembled at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Boston going through the 19 recommendations of the Health IT Policy Committee to federal officials regarding Stage 3 of the meaningful use program under the HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act. Clearly, what the Health IT Policy Committee recommends is going to be tremendously influential, as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) prepare to create and then release a proposed rule for MU Stage 3.
But what really got the audience’s attention was this: Dr. Halamka, pivoting off the revelation last week that only four patient care organizations had so far attested successfully to Stage 2 of MU, predicted that only 20 percent of hospital-based patient care organizations would successfully do so. Put another way, he predicted that 80 percent of hospitals would fail to successfully attest to Stage of MU within the allotted time, and that there would be mass applications for hardship exemptions.
“Stage 2 has basically co-opted the entire agenda of CIOs” and other healthcare IT leaders, Halamka told his audience. “My prediction: 20 percent will attest to Stage 2 on time; 80 percent won’t, and there will be huge numbers leaving the program.”
More of the difficult story here:
Again we see arguments for keeping it simple and playing the long and patient game in e-Health. As we saw with the PCEHR haste is death.
David.

Senate Estimates Hearing - June 3 2014 - E-Health Section. Obfuscation Central I Have To Say!

Here is the transcript:
First the Cast of Characters:
Senators as Linked In Text and:
Senator Nash, Assistant Minister for Health
Professor Jane Halton, Secretary
Mr Paul Madden, Chief Information and Knowledge Officer
Ms Linda Powell, First Assistant Secretary, eHealth Division
Here is the transcript:
[21:17]
CHAIR: We will now resume with outcome 7. The plan was to run through in seriatim—to borrow Senator McLucas's phrase—except that we will do program 7.6, blood and organ donation, together with the two relevant authorities if that suits people. There are questions in almost every area, so we will have to try to stick quite rigidly to time.
Senator CAROL BROWN: How many Australians now have an e-Health record?
Mr Madden : There are about 1.66 million Australians registered for an e-Health record so far.
Prof. Halton : Ask us tomorrow morning. It will have gone up by another 3,500.
CHAIR: Why is that, Professor Halton? Does it do that every night?
Prof. Halton : Basically. Sometimes 4,000 and sometimes 3,000, but about that.
Senator CAROL BROWN: When does that 1.66 million date from?
Mr Madden : That is from 1 July 2012.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Can you remind me when the e-Health system was up and running?
Mr Madden : Registration for consumers was available through the DHS call centres from 1 July 2012, and it was available online for consumers on about 18 July 2012.
Senator CAROL BROWN: You are probably going to need to take this on notice. Could I have a month by month breakdown of the enrolments?
Mr Madden : Sure, we will take that on notice.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Are you able to provide that sort of information across the states and territories at all?
Mr Madden : Yes, we can give a break up of enrolments by states and territories, by sex and within age groups as well.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Could I get that?
Mr Madden : Yes.
Ms Powell : I was just going to let Senator Brown know that we have, in fact, provided the month-by-month breakdown of the consumer enrolments in a previous question on notice. We can update that, and I can also give you state-by-state breakdown now if you would like that.
Senator CAROL BROWN: That would be good. Given that it goes up so dramatically daily, that would be handy. That state and territory information would be particularly good to know.
Ms Powell : In New South Wales, we have 506,000; in Victoria, we have 355,000; in Queensland, we have 334,000; in South Australia, we have 169,000; in Western Australia, we have 147,000; in the ACT, we have 57,000; in the Northern Territory, we have 21,000; and in Tasmania, we have 64,000.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Would you also be able to provide me with the percentages as well?
Ms Powell : Yes.
Prof. Halton : As in of the population of the state?
Prof. Halton : It is interesting, Senator. Given we had that discussion about the ACT and its characteristics earlier on today, I feel a small obligation to skite about the ACT. I think we are sitting on about 15 per cent of the population in the ACT.
CHAIR: What is the figure overall of the eligible percentage?
Ms Powell : Sorry, Senator. I am not quite sure I understand your question.
Prof. Halton : If it is 23 million people in the population and 1.7 rounded million, we can do the math.
CHAIR: It is about eight per cent.
Prof. Halton : That is right.
Senator MOORE: Ms Powell, when you get the data in terms of the update month by month and also the state distributions, can we now have them put into a Fierravanti-Wells table that we get at every Senate estimates?
Prof. Halton : I think she will be very flattered by that.
Senator MOORE: She knows. We have actually agreed that that is the terminology we will use.
Prof. Halton : Absolutely great.
Senator MOORE: If we can get an FW process there—and they are the kinds of data we want to keep an eye on all the way through—if we could get that every time, that would be our standard request.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Just for my interest, do you have the percentage of the Tasmanian figure there in front of you?
Ms Powell : I do not have the percentage of the Tasmanian population.
Senator CAROL BROWN: I will wait till you provide it on notice. At the last estimates we were also told that all public hospitals in Queensland had gone live with eHealth records?
Prof. Halton : With discharge summaries? I think we took that.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Can you give us a bit of an update on how that is progressing?
Ms Powell : Certainly. A total of 265 public hospitals are connected to the PCEHR. Twenty-eight of those are in New South Wales, seven are in South Australia, one is in the ACT, 219 are in Queensland, three are in Tasmania and seven are in Victoria. They are all connected to the PCEHR.
Senator CAROL BROWN: So there are 265 across the country.
Ms Powell : Some of those are connected to view information, and some of those are connected to actually upload discharge summaries.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Do you have that breakdown?
Ms Powell : I do. The only place is Queensland, where 111 are able to upload discharge summaries. The numbers are the same everywhere else. There is a program rolling out across the states.
Senator CAROL BROWN: And what is your target with connecting the hospitals?
Ms Powell : NEHTA have been working closely with all of the state governments. The way they have been doing their rollout has varied according to different things that are going on in their states. For example, in Queensland, because they had a number of upgrades happening across the state at the same time, they were able to connect all of the hospitals. In New South Wales they have started with smaller numbers and they have been progressively rolling out as they are able to.
Senator CAROL BROWN: What is your expectation of when we will be able to see all the public hospitals across the country connected?
Ms Powell : I am not sure when we will have all of them connected. In WA, for example, there is much more of a staggered approach; they will be starting in the urban areas and rolling out much more slowly into other areas. So I do not have that information. I can see what other details I can get for you.
Senator CAROL BROWN: What was the situation in Tasmania?
Ms Powell : In Tasmania three hospitals are connected.
Senator CAROL BROWN: How many specialists have registered? Do you have that information?
Ms Powell : There are 112 specialists that we know have registered to connect to the system. The way the registration works is that health provider organisations register to use the system as well. For example, if you have a hospital that is registered to use the system, specialists within that hospital might be accessing it. So we do not have those numbers.
Senator McLUCAS: Do you have the number of private specialists who are registered?
Ms Powell : I do not have that information.
Mr Madden : The way we keep the tally of who is registered is that, if you are registered, as Ms Powell put it, as a provider organisation, all of the specialists, GPs and health providers within that organisation can use it. We cannot keep a count of how many are in that. For those who have registered with a health provider identifier as an individual, we can know the specialty or the particular type of healthcare provider they are, but it does not discern whether they are a private practice or a public practice. We do know what type of provider they are, but not all providers register with a healthcare provider identifier as an individual. Most come through as an organisation.
Senator McLUCAS: If you were a specialist who did a little bit of work at a public hospital as a VMO, you are captured there and you do not have to reregister in your private practice?
Mr Madden : That is right. They could be registered in their own right within their own private practice but, if they are in a hospital as a public VMO, they will be using hospital system's HPI-O to get that.
Senator CAROL BROWN: I want to move to the review. I know it has been released, but when was the review completed?
Mr Madden : The review was tabled around 23 December 2013. It was released publicly on 19 May 2014.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Did you say 24 May?
Mr Madden : 19 May.
Senator CAROL BROWN: When will the government be formally responding to the review?
Senator Nash: My understanding is we are working through that at the moment, Senator. We are working through the response to the review now.
Senator CAROL BROWN: No suggestion of a time frame there, Minister?
Senator Nash: I can take it on notice for you—but, at this stage, not from me.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Not in the near future?
Senator Nash: I would not like to make an assumption.
Prof. Halton : Let us be clear: at one level the government already has responded to the review by funding actually the PCEHR—
Senator CAROL BROWN: Funding for the one year.
Prof. Halton : Yes, absolutely. And the minister is on the record in relation to the forward commitment to this.
Senator CAROL BROWN: I have seen what is in the budget papers and the funding provided for 2014-15. It is what is beyond that, obviously, that is of interest.
Prof. Halton : Yes. But, again, go to the language used by the minister. There are some issues that need to be resolved which, as the minister says, are being worked on at the moment. The PCEHR or what it becomes based on the recommendations of the review, with all the things that are covered in the review, is an important part of infrastructure.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Are you able to tell me what the cost of the review was?
Mr Madden : I do not have the cost with me. Ms Powell, do you have that detail with you? I am pretty sure we provided some of that in the last series of estimates, so it will not be hard to pull out.
Ms Powell : Yes, I do have that information. The total cost of the review, all up, was $196,000.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Has the department provided a brief to the minister on the review?
Prof. Halton : Several.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Right. I will not ask when, then. The transition from the personally controlled electronic health record system to the 'my health' record—has an appropriation been made for that transition?
Mr Madden : At the moment that is one of the recommendations in the review and we do not have a formal position on any of the recommendations.
Senator CAROL BROWN: So that is under consideration by the minister—whether he will take up that recommendation.
Senator Nash: That is right.
Senator CAROL BROWN: How many staff are employed on the implementation of the eHealth records?
Mr Madden : On the current operation of the system?
Ms Powell : In terms of the staffing arrangements, the information I can give you that is probably the most useful is the number of staff that are working in the division, which covers a whole range of activities: the operation of the eHealth record, policy, work on the legislation and many eHealth related activities. We have got 57 staff at the moment, plus a number of contractors.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Can you tell me how many contractors?
Ms Powell : We have 18 contractors in a variety of arrangements.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Doing a variety of roles within the division?
Ms Powell : That is right.
Senator CAROL BROWN: I will not ask the government's position on some of the other recommendations. I am assuming that is all under consideration. The e-health summit and implementation of the clinical trial functionality into jurisdictional e-health systems—are we proceeding with that?
Ms Powell : The e-health summit?
Ms Powell : I am thinking that you might be referring to a conference run by CHIK Services earlier this year. I am not sure what the e-health summit is.
Prof. Halton : It is not self-evident what that means, Senator.
Senator CAROL BROWN: What is that?
Prof. Halton : It is not self-evident what you mean by eHealth summit.
Senator CAROL BROWN: It is my understanding that there was a summit that proposed—
Prof. Halton : By whom?
Senator CAROL BROWN: I understand that it was a decision made between the state and territories and the Australian government. I could be wrong, but that was proposed.
Prof. Halton : Not that I have any visibility of.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Just before I finish, the National E-Health Transition Authority—what is the appropriation for that? I cannot find it here.
Mr Madden : The Commonwealth's share of that is $34 million and that means that the state contribution combined would be the same value.
CHAIR: Has the state contribution been made, Mr Madden?
Mr Madden : As far as I am aware, all but three states have worked through that to commit. The other three are still working through the administrative processes.
CHAIR: Are you able to tell us which—
Mr Madden : I will take that on notice, if that is all right, Senator.
Senator CAROL BROWN: So that $34 million is over how many years?
Mr Madden : For one year. That covers the operation and servicing of things like the Healthcare Identifiers Service and the National Authentication Service for Health, as well as all the standards.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Okay. I am just trying to find some information about the summit. I might have to come back and ask for some indulgence, Chair. While you are there and I am looking through my information, is there an ongoing promotional strategy for e-health records?
Mr Madden : No, Senator. We continue to provide help, support and information to people who make inquiries or are wishing to connect to the system. There is a level of information and communication out there in the community and through the public hospitals through the admission process so people are made aware of the fact that they can have an e-health record, but we do not have any publicly espoused communication strategy from the Commonwealth at the moment.
Senator CAROL BROWN: Is it just through those two streams that you just mention?
Mr Madden : All of the information which has been provided publicly about the e-health system is still out there in private and primary practice. It is available through the hospitals and clinics. It is all there. It is all of the information that we put out last year. We have not embarked on a campaign or any advertising or education beyond what we have already done so far.
Senator CAROL BROWN: You are not considering anything like that?
Mr Madden : While we are considering the position on all of the recommendations, how far we push those things will depend on how we go with some of those recommendations.
[21:38]
The link is found here:
I have put the bits I think interesting in italics but I have to say the quality and depth of questions was a bit sad.
Well I suspect the next big event will be the release of the Government response to the PCEHR Review.
This really is like pulling teeth!
David.