Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Review Of The Ongoing Post - Budget Controversy 12th February 2015. The Co-Payment Causes Big Trouble!

Budget Night was on Tuesday 13th May, 2014 and the fuss has still not settled by a long shot. Indeed more than a few commentators are now wondering out loud if the Abbot Government will last for a second term - indeed until next week might be tricky after the Spill etc..
The modified Medicare co-payment plan - announced late last year  - has now gone very quiet with the Government disarray of the last 3 weeks. The Queensland election has hardly helped!
Now part of Co-payment Plan B is gone,  but some extreme nasties still remain, i.e. the rebate cut for short consults has been abandoned but the freezing of rebate levels until 2018 and a plan for a co-payment are still live. Consultation proceeds!
Seems there are lots of broader problems also. See here:
-----
It is also amazing that with the 2014 Budget still not passed we are seeing submissions regarding the 2015 Budget.
-----
Other articles this week.

General Budget Issues.

Voters trusting eclectic Senate to save them from budget's worst measures

Date February 1, 2015 - 11:00PM

Latika Bourke

Voters appear to be trusting that the eclectic mix of crossbenchers who control the balance of the power in the Senate will continue to block unpopular budget moves with a new survey showing voters concerns about their financial comfort easing.
Concerns about the negative financial impact from the federal budget fell from its high of 67 per cent in June last year by 15 points in December, according to ME Bank's survey of 1500 voters.
But worryingly for the government, more than half or 52 per cent of those surveyed still fear the budget will impact on their financial comfort with concern highest amongst those who receive government support including retirees who are usually considered traditional Coalition supporters.
-----

Abbott leadership facing toughest test

Updated: 12:20 pm, Monday, 2 February 2015
Tony Abbott's address to the National Press Club is being seen as a leadership make or break event, as the prime minister urges colleagues not to 'navel-gaze' after the shock Queensland election result.
The routing of the Liberal National Party in Queensland is a further blow to Mr Abbott's grip on the top job, already weakened by his controversial decision to award Prince Philip a knighthood.
But in the wake of the disastrous state poll a determined prime minister defended his leadership.
Government wasn't a popularity contest but 'a competence contest', he said on Sunday.
'I don't say for a second that we haven't made mistakes. I don't say for a second that we can't do things better,' he said.
-----
2 February 2015, 3.19pm AEDT

What ails Abbott is but a symptom of disease of government today

Author Shaun Carney

Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Social Sciences at Monash University
If a single speech is regarded as a make-or-break event for an Australian prime minister, then that prime minister faces an uncomfortable future. That’s because the “make” part is a fraud. Tony Abbott could have finished himself off with a dreadful performance at his appearance at the National Press Club on Monday. But he never stood a chance of restoring his prime ministership simply by putting on a decent or even a brilliant showing.
That’s because once the make-or-break tests begin, they never stop. Get through this announcement, this parliamentary showdown, this interview and there’ll always be another one. That’s the zone Abbott will now inhabit for as long as he remains prime minister or until the next election, should he still hold the position then. He’s only ever one more blunder away from collapse.
------

Why the rate cut exposes Abbott’s bigger mistakes

10:21pm, Feb 4, 2015
Rob Burgess Economics commentator
The Coalition administered a ‘shock-and-awe strategy’ that disproportionately hurt the lower socio-economic groups.
In the lead-up to the 2013 election, a News Corp columnist with whom I worked at the time returned from a Coalition briefing and wrote: “If the Coalition win, they are planning a once-in-a-generation culture change for the nation. It’s never been attempted before.”
With hindsight, it’s clear that it will never be attempted again.
It is sad, in a way, that the nation is in uproar over Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s decision to knight Prince Philip – sad because it is a distraction from more important failings.
Mr Abbott achieved a historic victory in 2013 because he had crafted deadly political weapons, none of which had much bearing on economic growth.
Foremost among them were “stop the boats”, “end the debt and deficit” and “axe the carbon and mining taxes”.
-----

Joe Hockey’s budget backdown

Laura Tingle and Jacob Greber
The Abbott government has ­abandoned the search for big May budget savings, will not meet its ­forecast 2018 return to surplus and is privately acknowledging collapsing revenue means it is highly unlikely to offer tax cuts at the next ­federal ­election.
The dramatic dumping of ­long-standing goals came as a two-day meeting of the federal cabinet heard a gloomy update from Reserve Bank of Australia governor Glenn Stevens and Treasury secretary John Fraser.
There has been a major shift in ­economic rhetoric from embattled Prime Minister Tony Abbott and ­Treasurer Joe Hockey in recent days, to a focus on “growth and jobs”.
-----

Joe Hockey fends off questions about troubled budget strategy as $40 billion hit looms

Date February 5, 2015 - 5:38PM

Gareth Hutchens

Treasurer Joe Hockey has fended off questions about his troubled budget strategy, insisting he has a "steely determination" to keep making difficult decisions despite reports the government has abandoned the search for big savings in its next budget.
Mr Hockey was briefed on the state of the global economy this week by Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens and Treasury secretary John Fraser, and was told about significant economic problems in Europe that threaten Australia's economy.
Speaking on Thursday, Mr Hockey admitted a huge write-down in iron ore prices, weaker-than-expected economic growth and an expected increase in unemployment will hit government revenue much harder than predicted.
-----

Medicare, uni policies falling to backbench revolt?

5th Feb 2015
CONTROVERSIAL federal government changes to Medicare and universities look set to be dumped or radically altered as Prime Minister Tony Abbott tries to ward off a backbench-led leadership coup.
Trade Minister Andrew Robb, who was involved in a two-day cabinet strategy meeting this week, said backbenchers’ concerns were “legitimate” and the prime minister and his ministers were listening.
“We allowed some surprise policies to be dropped out in the budget last year to do with education and to do with health,” Mr Robb told ABC radio today.
While the policies had merit, they had not been properly discussed within the party and the government had allowed Labor to “frighten people” about them.
-----

Health Budget Issues.

2 February 2015, 6.07am AEDT

Shaping 2015: Time to go back to the drawing board on health

Author Suzanne Robinson

Associate Professor of Health Policy and Management at Curtin University
Australia does well in terms of health outcomes and ranks high internationally. However, the health system faces a number of pressures. These include rising demand due to an ageing population, increasing consumer expectations and growing burden of complex chronic health conditions.
All of this is leading to rising expenditure on health and increasing pressure on government budgets. Commonwealth health expenditure is estimated to increase by 3.9% in real terms from 2014-15 to 2017-18.
Australia also faces equity issues. Disadvantaged groups such as Indigenous Australians, those on low incomes and people who live in rural and regional areas are often unable to access high-quality care in a timely fashion.
-----

Ebola treatment centre company Aspen Medical donated $30,000 to Liberal Party

Date February 3, 2015 - 6:09PM

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

The company awarded a $20 million contract to operate an Ebola treatment centre on behalf of Australia donated $30,000 to the Liberal Party last financial year.
Political party financial disclosure documents published by the Australian Electoral Commission this week show Aspen Medical gave $30,000 to the federal division of the Liberal Party in 2013-14. 
The return for the ACT Liberal Party also shows the party received $15,000 from Aspen, but says this money was "incorrectly paid" into the party's account, and was returned to the company in June last year.
-----

Queenslanders delaying doctor visits due to cost, despite high bulk-billing rate

  • Damon Guppy
  • The Courier-Mail
  • February 04, 2015 12:15AM
HUNDREDS of thousands of Queenslanders are putting off seeing a doctor because they cannot afford it, despite the state having one of the highest bulk-billing rates in Australia.
The report on the nation’s healthcare systems also shows almost 10 per cent of people aged over 15 are delaying getting prescription medication because of the costs.
The Productivity Commission report, released today, is part of a seven-volume document that provides analysis of government services using comparative data dating as far back as 2002.
“The report helps to drive improvements in the effectiveness of services, providing benefits to those who use them,” Productivity Commission chairman Peter Harris said.
-----

Why reform is difficult. Health ministers are in office but not in power.

Melissa Sweet | Feb 04, 2015 11:21AM | EMAIL | PRINT
Hopefully, someone, somewhere – whether in the Federal Coalition or in the ALP – is putting some serious thought into community-centred health reform. As health leaders have suggested, it’s well past time to move past “thought bubbles” masquerading as policy.
In the article below, experienced policy analyst John Menadue (pictured below) identifies some of the challenges and blockages facing serious reformers, in the second of a three-part series on health reform which is being cross published at Croakey from his blog.
(See also the first article: A refresher course: why health reform is needed).
***
 John Menadue writes:
There is a major barrier to health reform. It is the power of providers or at least their assumed power. When I was asked by the National Hospital and Health Reform Commission to describe in a sentence or even one word the obstacles to health reform I said ‘power’, the power of providers. I don’t the Commission got what I was driving at!
A succession of Australian health ministers may have been in office but they have not been in power.
-----
5 February 2015, 2.58pm AEDT

Why the government would have us pay more for poorer health

Authors
John Attia
Professor of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology at University of Newcastle
John Duggan
Conjoint Professor at University of Newcastle
The Coalition government has been claiming that Australia’s public health system is unsustainable since the 2014 budget. But its plans for the health system actually reflect the underlying belief that user-pays health systems are better – despite evidence to to contrary.
Less than a year and a half into the Abbott government’s first term, we’re on our second health minister and the third iteration of some kind of plan to introduce a co-payment for seeing a doctor. Despite widespread and vocal opposition to its plans, the government remains committed to introducing this price signal into the public health system.
Underpinning this move is the government’s commitment to a user-pays health system. But there’s now a large body of evidence showing such systems not necessarily great for the nation’s health. Here are four common ideas about market-based health systems and why they are not true.
-----

Medicare architect suggests making business pay for sick certificates

Date February 7, 2015 - 10:35PM

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

Employers, not employees, should pay for medical certificates because it is employers who need them, academic says.
Medicare architect John Deeble has suggested a new way of funding healthcare as an alternative to charging patients to see the doctor: making business pay for medical certificates.
Professor Deeble, who co-wrote proposals that formed the basis of Medicare, suggested the certificates employers require to verify a worker's illness should be billed separately by Medicare, and the amount then recouped through a levy on business.
"It's got nothing to do with healthcare, so why not?" Professor Deeble said.
----

Medicare Co-payment Issues.

Short GP visits back on agenda despite data

Sean Parnell

HEALTH Minister Sussan Ley is forging ahead with plans for a new price structure for GP visits and reforms to discourage short consultations, despite researchers finding no link between bulk-billing and the duration of appointments.
When Tony Abbott and then health minister Peter Dutton announced the government’s second co-payment policy in December, they unexpectedly included cuts to the Medicare rebate for short consultations to combat so-called “six-minute medicine’’ and the “patient churn’’.
The Prime Minister said the rebate change was “actually a quality measure which has been widely welcomed by medical groups’’ but it nonetheless sparked a doctors’ revolt that led to Mr Dutton being moved and the policy shelved.
According to an article in today’s Medical Journal of Australia, patients who are bulk-billing usually share common characteristics such as a chronic disease, being a concession-card holder and, surprisingly, having private health insurance.
-----

Study finds no bulk-billing link to short visit to doctor despite federal government concerns

Date February 1, 2015 - 11:15PM

Kate Hagan Health Reporter

Bulk-billing doctors are no more likely to have short consultations with their patients, a study has found, casting doubt on federal government claims that current subsidies encourage "six-minute medicine".
In a study of 2500 Australians, researchers found patients who had a short consultation with a general practitioner at their last visit were no more likely to be bulk-billed than those who had longer consultations.
The finding comes as Health Minister Sussan Ley continues to talk to doctors and the community about options to reform Medicare.
She said the Medicare schedule favoured shorter consultations and was "driving some doctors to provide 'six-minute medicine' rather than more comprehensive care".
-----

Tasmanian doctors vow to resist Federal Government's GP co-payment policy

Mon 2 Feb 2015, 7:41am
Tasmanian doctors have told a meeting in Hobart they feel under siege by the Federal Government's attempts to introduce a GP visit co-payment.
National Medical Association representatives at the forum are vowing to take their messages back to Federal Health Minister Sussan Ley.
Associate Professor Tim Greenaway from the Australian Medical Association said Tasmanian GPs had become unlikely political activists.
"This issue has mobilised doctors, this is a direct attack on primary care," he said.
-----

Perverse copayment effects

Sarah Colyer
Monday, 2 February, 2015
NEW research reveals surprising findings about which patients are most likely to be bulk-billed by GPs, as the backlash continues against the federal government’s plans to impose a copayment.
The MJA study examined factors influencing GP bulk-billing, finding practices with just one or two doctors were more likely to bulk-bill than those with more practitioners, defying the stereotype of big corporate practices driving high bulk-billing rates. (1)
Also unexpectedly, patients with private health insurance were more likely to be bulk-billed than patients without cover, after adjusting for income and presence of a chronic disease.
The study was based on an online survey of more than 2000 Australians, with 71% saying they were bulk-billed at their last GP visit.
-----

The full story...

Many high income earners benefiting from bulkbilling, study reveals

Rachel Carbonell reported this story on Monday, February 2, 2015 12:45:00
-----
5 February 2015, 6.02am AEDT

$5 Medicare rebate cut could cost patients up to $40 more

Author Stephen Duckett

Stephen Duckett is a Friend of The Conversation.
Director, Health Program at Grattan Institute
The Christmas-New Year silly season gave Australia three health policies. At the start of December, the policy from the 2014 budget was still on life support. But in mid-December, then-health minister Peter Dutton announced a new rebate reduction policy. This survived less than a month.
In January, the new health minister, Sussan Ley, dumped the minimum time requirement for a level B consultation – the most common type of patient visit – and promised to consult on what should replace it.
Two other elements of the government’s revised co-payment policy remain: a A$5 cut to GP funding for each service a GP performs for patients who are over 15 and don’t have a concession card; and a freeze on Medicare rebates until 2018.
-----

Doctors management of viruses, diabetes and asthma and elderly found wanting

  • February 04, 2015 9:00PM
  • Sue Dunlevy National Health Reporter
  • News Corp Australia Network
GPs have been exposed as slackers with a new report showing they are prescribing antibiotics for viruses, failing to properly care for asthma and diabetes patients and the elderly.
As the government locks heads with doctors over a planned $5 cut to the Medicare rebate, the Productivity Commission’s Report on Government Services raises questions about the current standard of general practitioner care.
It reports that one in three GPs are prescribing antibiotics for upper respiratory viruses even though they don’t work on viruses and their over use is breeding deadly resistant bugs.
Only a quarter of asthma patients have an asthma action plan drawn up by their GP which outlines what medication to take, how to manage an attack so patients reduce hospital visits and take fewer days off work.
-----

Productivity Commission gives thumbs-up to GPs

5 February, 2015 Amanda Davey
General practice is the most efficient and cost-effective part of the Australian health system, says AMA head Associate Professor Brian Owler.
Citing the latest Productivity Commission report, Dr Owler says general practice costs the government a “modest” $299 per person a year.
“The Productivity Commission has provided further evidence that the government’s budget measures for general practice are unwarranted and ill-directed,” Dr Owler says.
“It’s bad health policy to create disincentives for people to go to their GP by making healthcare more expensive for the people less able to afford it.”
-----

Patients face $1,000 out of pocket expenses for surgery as a result government Medicare cuts

  • February 05, 2015 6:18PM
  • Sue Dunlevy National Health Reporter
  •  News Corp Australia Network
THE government’s Medicare cuts will not only affect GP visits but drive up costs for private health fund members who face new $1,000 out-of-pocket fees for surgery, the AMA has warned.
The government’s four year freeze on Medicare rebates for specialists would undermine health fund no-gap schemes and force patients out of health insurance, AMA president Professor Brian Owler warned.
One example, he told a Senate committee in Canberra, was that patients who now paid no gap fee for brain surgery would face an out-of-pocket charge of $1,114.
“If the schedule for specialists continues to be frozen it will mean less people will participate in no-gap schemes, that means the out-of-pocket expenses for patients will skyrocket,” he said.
-----

Health Department admits lack of in-depth analysis of Medicare co-payment

Senate committee forces concession there was no evidence-based advice given to Coalition ministers on the co-payment policy
The federal Department of Health has admitted that it failed to conduct in-depth analysis or research on the social impact of Medicare co-payments before the government announced its policy.
Representatives from Treasury and the departments of Health and Finance were pressed by a Senate committee on Thursday about what advice they had provided to the government on the implications of increasing costs for GP consultations.
“You haven’t done any specific research on co-payments, is that correct?” Labor senator Doug Cameron asked the panel of eight senior public servants.
-----

Co-payment lambasted at Senate hearing

5th Feb 2015
THE government’s claim its co-payment policy would protect Medicare and strengthen the health system has been roundly rejected by doctors and experts speaking at a Senate Select Committee on Health in Canberra today.
AMA president Associate Professor Brian Owler told the inquiry that the government had not consulted with the medical profession, and said the co-payment was not health but fiscal policy. 
“Anecdote, personal assertion, and in particular, ideology” had driven the past year of health policy, Professor Owler said. 
-----

Listening, but no Ley-way on co-pay

30th Jan 2015
HEALTH Minister Sussan Ley gave no ground on her government’s GP co-payment policy when she met doctor groups in Canberra this week.
But the doctors who attended say she was “open and receptive” and has already outshone her predecessor by consulting them. 
RACGP president Dr Frank Jones said Ms Ley had been “very much in listening mode” when she met for an hour in Canberra on Wednesday with representatives from the seven medical associations comprising United General Practice Australia.
“We discussed how we could help her look at the rest of the health system, rather than looking at a price signal on general practice,” Dr Jones said. “But she’s obviously concerned with introducing a price signal. That’s political.”

Medical Research Fund:

Future medical fund an ‘accounting trick’

Rosie Lewis

Reporter
Canberra
THE Abbott government’s $20 billion Medical Research Future Fund “seems to be an accounting trick” to make the nation’s debt look more desirable, according to the Australian Medical Association.
Speaking at a Senate committee yesterday, AMA president Brian Owler said the announcement of the MRFF in last year’s budget had led to a “terrible episode”, pitting GPs and researchers against each other.
The MRFF is meant to be largely financed by the controversial GP co-payment but with the measure still unlegislated the fund’s future remains uncertain.
-----
Comment:
I also have to say reading all the articles I still have no idea what is actually going to happen with the Budget (or the Government) at the end of the day.
As pointed out on Insiders last year the next chance to have progress  in February, 2015 when Parliament comes back! Right now there is a lot of planning going on behind the scenes.
One wonders for how much longer this will go on and just what impact a change of leader might have?
Enjoy.
David.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

The OpenNotes Movement Is Gathering Pace and Seemingly Making A Difference - All Good!

This appeared a little while ago.

OpenNotes: 'This is not a software package, this is a movement'

Posted on Jan 08, 2015
By Mike Miliard, Editor
Tom Delbanco, MD, professor of general medicine and primary care at Harvard Medical School and former chief of general medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, is also co-director of the OpenNotes project, which gives patients access to the clinical notes written by their doctors and nurses.
OpenNotes initially launched in 2010 as a pilot program in three select locations: BIDMC, Geisinger Health System and Harborview Medical Center in Seattle. It soon became apparent that what may have seemed, at first, to be a revolutionary concept had struck a nerve.
Over the past five years, the initiative -- which Delbanco first developed alongside BIDMC researcher Jan Walker, RN -- has grown almost exponentially, finding footholds at some of the largest and most prestigious providers in the country, including the VA, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon Health & Science University and University of Colorado Health.
On Feb. 10, at the Healthcare IT News/HIMSS Media Patient Engagement Summit, at the Hyatt Regency in Orlando, Delbanco’s BIDMC colleague, National OpenNotes Program Director Melissa Anselmo, will talk about why OpenNotes is such a hit with patients – and, despite some initial resistance, most of the physicians who take part in it as well.
In the meantime. Delbanco describes how the project has evolved thus far, and how it plans to expand to a truly nationwide movement.  
Q: OpenNotes has experienced some pretty impressive growth since that first pilot in 2010.
A: We've gone from 20,000 people two years ago to, we think, between 4.5 million and 5 million now, who have access to their notes via secure electronic portals.
Q: Clearly this is an idea that had legs. So how did it all get started?
A: I've always thought the medical record is the hub of the wheel, the way to bring patients much closer to those who care for them. I did an experiment 30 years ago where I actually had patients walking around this hospital with records they kept – and writing their own records along with the doctors writing theirs – and saying, 'Let's compare notes.' We published a paper about that, the doctors thought the patients were crazy. It was a little early.
Then we got a grant (in 2010) from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to try this out in a big way using electronic portals. We asked doctors to volunteer in three settings. One is Beth Israel Deaconess, one of the big Harvard teaching hospitals. Another is the Geisinger Health System, which is this enormous integrated health system, serving rural Pennsylvania. And the third is Harborview, a safety net hospital in Seattle. We wanted three very different sites.
A lot of doctors told us to go to hell. But we got more than 100 to volunteer – primary care doctors – which meant that automatically their patients who were registered on portals would be part of the study. There were about 20,000 of them.
Q: Did you notice any differences between those three very different locales?
A: We found extraordinarily few differences, which was very interesting. Much fewer than we expected. Part of what helped our study was that we didn't just do it in one place, and that the findings, from both doctors and patients, were so similar. People felt it really had some generalizability to it.
The intervention was very simple: After the doctor signed his or her note, the patient automatically got an email saying, "Tom just signed his note; Mike, you're welcome to read, it." And then, two weeks before your appointment with your primary care doctor, you got a reminder email saying, "You might want to review your notes."
That's all there was to it. A very simple intervention. All the vendors have them. But what's been hidden, up to now, is what the doctor writes, and what he or she thinks about you. You can look up your lab work, you can look up your X-ray results, you can send secure emails, you can ask for appointments and refills. But you have not, in the past, been able to look up what the doctor wrote about you. That's what the disruptive innovation is.
Lots more here:
At the same time we had this:

Patients to Take Control of Data in ‘Democratization’ of Medicine

JAN 8, 2015 7:48am ET
Eric Topol, M.D., chief academic officer of Scripps Health in San Diego, is many things. He is a practicing cardiologist, a geneticist, a researcher, and a bestselling author.
In his 2012 book The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Healthcare, Topol argues that the healthcare industry is in the beginning phases of its “creative destruction”—a term coined by economist Joseph Schumpeter to describe the revolutionary process by which innovation replaces old industries with new ones. At the heart of this digital-medical revolution, he asserts, is a fundamental shift in who accesses and “owns” medical data and health information—a transfer of power from doctors to consumers.
Now, Topol has come out with a new book, The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine is in Your Hands, continuing his theme of consumer empowerment. Just as Gutenberg’s printing press spread literature to the masses for the first time in history, he makes the case that smartphones and other mobile devices in the hands of patients will serve to “democratize medicine” giving them control of their data—which has historically been the domain of physicians.
Health Data Management spoke to Topol about his latest book and the future of medicine.
Lots more here:
and this:

Mental Health Notes-Sharing Pilot Seen as Success

JAN 8, 2015 7:32am ET
Clinicians and patients participating in a pilot implementation of the OpenNotes note-sharing program for mental health treatment at Boston's Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center say the program has yielded tangible benefits.
As of Dec. 1, 2014, hospital executives said approximately 85,000 BIDMC patients use the hospital's PatientSite portal to manage their care, and about 1,000 of those had access to their mental health notes since the pilot began in March.
“We can certainly say at this point, the angst which most clinicians feared by sharing their notes is not materializing,” said Stephen O’Neill, social work manager for psychiatry and primary care. “It has been strikingly quiet in this regard, with scattered exceptions. The vast majority of our patients are reporting that the notes are helpful and often clarifying. OpenNotes is not an end, it is one more means in giving our patients tools to assist them. Most patients report that it helps them to feel more in charge of their life and in a better ‘partnership’ with their clinical team.”
Again more here:
It seems this is the way many / most patients would like to interact and share information with their doctor.
Technologists need to work out what is the best way it can be supported and delivered - in the Australian setting. I am certain the PCEHR will not cut it - great big collection of .pdfs it is about to become!
David.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

This is Either A Mistake Or Someone Knows Something No One Has Told Us!

This popped up a few days ago:

PCEHR: The Journey Towards National eHealth Adoption


Here is the link:
There are no details currently available about the venue, dates, agenda and so on so this really looks like a bit of kite-flying. 2016 seems to be a very long way into the future.
Running a conference 14 months in the future on the PCEHR (and not MyHR) would seem to suggest to organiser is relatively under-informed!
What nonsense.
David.

Monday, February 09, 2015

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 9th February, 2015.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

A very quiet week with all sorts of other news overwhelming anything going on in e-Health.
As far as I can tell the present Health Minister is both sitting on the fence as far as the Spill is concerned as well as e-health given the lack of comment in the area!

Ley sitting on leaders fence

By NATALIE KOTSIOS
Feb. 7, 2015, midnight
FARRER MP Sussan Ley has called for “strong and stable government” in the wake of the federal government’s leadership crisis — but refused to answer direct questions on who she was backing.
The Health Minister issued a brief statement late yesterday but avoided the issue of whether or not she supported a spill.
“Continuing strong and stable government is an imperative for me, vital for the people I represent, and something we need to display to keep the confidence of those who elected us,” she said.
Ms Ley was promoted from the junior ministry in December by Prime Minister Tony Abbott.
-----
Even worse Ms Ley can’t choose her own staff….

No Sussan, she’s not on

By JAMES MASSOLA ANDMARK KENNY
Feb. 5, 2015, midnight
Health Minister Sussan Ley’s first choice as top adviser was knocked back by Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s chief of staff, Peta Credlin.
Fairfax Media has confirmed with three sources — including one familiar with the inner workings of the “star chamber” that vets government staff — that Rowena Cowan was knocked back by Ms Credlin in recent weeks.
A spokesman for the Prime Minister denied the story, declaring it was “wrong”, but would not elaborate.
-----
I wonder how long it will be before any progress becomes apparent?
-----

Graham Jones: Pathology power

Graham Jones
Monday, 2 February, 2015
MY colleagues in general practice tell me there are few things more certain to make your heart sink than a patient presenting with reams of potentially misleading information from the internet on their possible diagnosis.
So I was pleased to see the relaunch of the Lab Tests Online AU, a website that explains in plain English what a patient’s pathology tests mean.
Overseen by an editorial board of members from the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Lab Tests Online covers nearly every pathology test on the Medicare Benefits Schedule and details of many of the conditions associated with the tests.
The site explains the purpose of specific tests as well as describing how testing is conducted. Before its relaunch, the website was generating more than 88 000 unique Australian visitors every month.
-----

Health group visits Hervey Bay to see digital hospital

Carlie Walker | 6th Feb 2015 3:46 PM
Delegates visited St Stephen's Hospital to learn more about their digital systems. Contributed.
A NATIONAL health group has visited St Stephen's Hospital in Hervey Bay to learn about the systems in place in Australia's first digital hospital.
The Health Informatics Society of Australia, a not-for profit digital health community dedicated to the advancement of e-health, brought a group of delegates to the hospital on Friday.
Executive Director of UnitingCare Health Richard Royale said about 80 people had attended the event at St Stephen's Hospital to hear from individuals who have helped implement the system in the hospital.
The hospital was chosen to host the event because it is the country's first full integrated digital hospital.
-----

Cancer research goes digital with top-level domain

Date February 4, 2015 - 12:15AM

Hannah Francis

Technology Reporter

While some charities beg for cash on the kerb, a leading cancer non-profit is courting young philanthropists in cyberspace by becoming the first charity to register a top-level web domain (TLD).
Moving away from the tired old formula of .com or .org, The Australian Cancer Research Fund (ACRF), now in its 30th year, has launched nine websites ending in .cancerresearch to raise funds and promote the cause of finding a cure for cancer.
The World Cancer Day launch coincides with a selfie-inspired interactive fundraising campaign at theone.cancerresearch, which invites visitors to upload their profile picture and become part of "The One Who Will End Cancer".
-----

Rheumatologist slams biologics approval process

5 February, 2015 Rachel Worsley
A rheumatologist has criticised the “archaic” approval process for rheumatoid arthritis biologics and says it’s about time the system is moved online.  
Dr Paul Kubler, a rheumatologist at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital in Queensland, says it’s quite surprising that in 2015, getting authority for biologic scripts has to be done via traditional mail.
“The process is you have to see the patient, complete the forms which generally take 30-45 minutes, send them to Medicare in Hobart and then the script comes back and you get it to the patient,” he says.
The total turnaround time is 2-3 weeks, he says, but occasionally it blows out to four weeks. Sometimes scripts get lost in the mail, adding to the overall delay.
-----

Hackers steal millions of US health records

  • Anna Wilde Mathews and Danny Yadron
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • February 05, 2015 4:05PM

Organised crime moves online

Anthem, the US’s second-biggest health insurer, said hackers broke into a database containing personal information for about 80 million of its customers and employees in what is likely to be the largest data breach disclosed by a healthcare company.
Investigators are still determining the extent of the incursion, which was discovered last week, and Anthem said it is likely that “tens of millions” of records were stolen.
The health insurer said the breach exposed names, birthdays, addresses and US social security numbers but doesn’t appear to involve medical information or financial details such as credit-card or bank-account numbers. Nor are there signs the data are being sold on the black market.
Anthem, which offers Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in California, New York and other states, said it doesn’t know precisely how many people may be affected. So far, it appears that the attack detected last week is the only breach of Anthem’s systems, and it isn’t yet clear how the hackers were able to obtain the identification information needed to access the database said Thomas Miller, the insurer’s chief information officer.
------

Poor security left Anthem customer records exposed

Summary: Were millions of records stolen from the healthcare insurance provider encrypted?
By Charlie Osborne for Zero Day | February 6, 2015 -- 13:06 GMT (00:06 AEDT)
Lax security is suspected of exposing Anthem's customer records and making them more valuable to hackers, reports suggest.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the healthcare insurance provider did not encrypt the Social Security numbers of both former and current employees -- 80 million records of which were potentially stolen in a crippling cyberattack.
A person familiar with the matter told the publication that no encryption was in place due to a "difficult balancing act" in protecting information -- and making it useful to the company.
The decision not to encrypt the data could hit Anthem hard. If the data was scrambled, the customer records would have been less valuable -- taking time to decrypt and potentially more difficult to access in the first place. The source also said encryption would have "made it harder for Anthem employees to track health care trends or share data with states and health providers." However, encryption makes data management slower, which could have influenced Anthem's decision, if the data was indeed left exposed.
-----

Overseas second-opinion service sparks fears

3 February, 2015 Tessa Hoffman
Hundreds of Australian patients have sought second opinions from overseas doctors through a controversial online service.
Best Doctors pays overseas physicians up to $1000 to give a second opinion without ever having contact with the patient.
Under the program, doctors from leading teaching hospitals in the US, Japan and Europe are chosen by Best Doctors to review patients’ medical files and treatment plans, making new diagnoses in 14% of cases and alternative treatment recommendations in 29% of cases.
Access to the service is currently only available to the members of select life and health insurance companies.
Best Doctors managing director Darren Reynolds said the service was designed to reduce medical diagnostic inaccuracy by providing a  fresh perspective that could feed into a treating doctor’s plan.
-----

Apple's HealthKit gets a checkup at top hospitals

The service is being trialed or considered at 14 of the 23 leading hospitals polled by Reuters, though implementing it poses some challenges.
Apple new HealthKit technology is getting its own examinations at some top hospitals to see if it can successfully monitor patients remotely and thus help trim medical costs.
Among 23 of the leading hospitals questioned by Reuters, 14 have launched a pilot program of HealthKit or are in discussions to do so, Reuters reported on Thursday. The goal of the program is to see if doctors can monitor patients with chronic ailments such as diabetes and hypertension looking for early signs of medical problems so they can step in before a problem becomes more serious.
Ultimately, such monitoring could help hospitals save money by cutting down on repeat admissions, which earn them penalties from the government, Reuters said.
Unveiled last year, Apple's HealthKit is a framework designed for developers to create apps that can gather and share medical information about its users. Via Apple's Health app, the data collected from third-party apps can then be sent remotely to doctors and hospitals. Apple is competing with Google and Samsung, which have launched similar services. Those services are only now starting to roll out for testing, which means Apple is ahead of the game. But many of the hospitals say they also want to test the Google Fit service since most smartphones run Android.
-----

Six smart medical devices that could improve your health

Date February 6, 2015 - 2:40PM

Sylvia Pennington

The fact Queensland start-up Medic8 Health put on hold a crowdfunding drive for its smart stethoscope last month, doesn't mean smart medical devices don't deserve a chance.
Despite having raised $528,000 from backers in more than 100 countries towards a $700,000 Kickstarter target for a wireless home version of the traditional doctor's staple, Medic8 Health decided to seek medical approval before accepting the funds.
It was a nice idea – the Stethee could be linked to a smartphone or tablet and used to track and analyse vital health signs and share them with others – but it isn't the only DIY medical aid to come off the digital drawing board in recent times.
-----

PCEHR: The Journey Towards National eHealth Adoption

-----

Melbourne Theatre Company Welcomes New Board Members

February 4
11:19 AM 2015
Chair of Melbourne Theatre Company Terry Moran AC today announced four new members to join the MTC board - Tony Burgess, Patricia Faulkner AO, Jane Hansen and Janette Kendall.
……
Patricia Faulkner AO is Chair of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Board, the National Health Performance Authority, Jesuit Social Services, Deputy Chair of St Vincent's Healthcare Australia, and a Commissioner of the Commonwealth Grants Commission. She has served on, and chaired, several boards including the Prime Minister's Social Inclusion Board and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute Board. Patricia has held health and social policy roles, including Secretary for the Department of Human Services, Victoria, where she was instrumental in establishing the National e-Health Transition Authority and was its first Chair. More recently, Patricia was a partner at KPMG, leading the firm's global health care business and the state governments sector. In 2008 she was appointed an Officer of the Order of Australia for her services in health and human services.
-----

Humans Account for Less Than Half of Global Web Traffic

February 6th, 2015
Global web traffic has increased sharply over the past few years. However, the majority of today's website traffic is not actually human traffic.
According to Incapsula's Global Bot Traffic Report, 56% of website traffic can be traced back to bots that automatically browse websites for different purposes. Roughly half of all automated traffic comes from good bots, e.g. search engine crawlers that index a website’s content. The other half of automated traffic is malicious though, caused by impersonators, content scrapers or other hacking tools that are used to steal data, spam websites or simply bring them down.
-----

Why 3D printers are 'the sewing machine for the 21st century'

Date February 5, 2015

Yuzuha Oka

While there are plenty of industries that can benefit from 3D printing, and a large number of enthusiasts already making everything from computer parts to kitchen gadgets, one fan of the technology is evangelising its use in a more everyday context.
April Staines, co-founder of Melbourne-based company Girl Geek Academy - which aims to increase the number of women with tech skills - sees 3D printing machines as a potential boon for independent craftspeople and engineers.
A huge fan of Star Wars and Hello Kitty, Staines first met a 3D printer at a pop culture expo.
"I make costumes and props for cosplay", Staines says. "But it can be very expensive, particularly because Australia is so far away [from the US]."
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Medicare Co-Payment Update - February 9, 2015 After The Spill

Have kept a close eye on the discussions regarding the the Medicare Co-Payment with the spill today (Mr Abbott stays as PM 61-39) and the subsequent news conferences and commentary.

As far as I can tell Mr Abbott is now actually recognising that Health Policy that is not at least tacitly accepted by the Medical Profession will probably / usually fail.

Ms Ley has now been sent out to consult and come up with a plan for a co-payment that will be acceptable to the profession. If that is not possible I get the sense the idea will simply be quietly dropped.

Time will tell but I suspect all that will survive is some form of the imposition of an additional cost to those who can really afford to pay a little more. Everyone else will see no change I believe reading the tea leaves.

I have no idea, yet, what will happen with the PCEHR but if things pan out as I suspect - with Government Health Revenue reduced - it is unlikely to be pushed on with rapidly.

David.

Sunday, February 08, 2015

This Really Seems To Be A Global Warning About Health System Security. Everyone Needs To Do Better!

This appeared a few days ago.

Health Insurer Anthem Didn’t Encrypt Data in Theft

Companies Aren’t Required by Law to Scramble Records, and Often Don’t

By Danny Yadron and Melinda Beck
Anthem Inc. stored the Social Security numbers of 80 million customers without encrypting them, the result of what a person familiar with the matter described as a difficult balancing act between protecting the information and making it useful.
Scrambling the data, which included addresses and phone numbers, could have made it less valuable to hackers or harder to access in bulk. It also would have made it harder for Anthem employees to track health care trends or share data with states and health providers, that person said.
The risks became clear last week, when Anthem discovered that hackers had broken into the database and made off with information on tens of millions of consumers, likely making it the largest computer breach disclosed by a health-care company.
Because the data wasn’t encrypted, it would be easily readable by hackers. The company believes a hacker group used a stolen employee password to access the database.
That storage decision has made the country’s second-largest health insurer the latest poster child for a continuing debate in executive suites: Is turning a corporate network into an electronic Fort Knox worth the potential cost?
Companies can employ random pass codes, limit access from outside the office or use complex math to scramble data. But those things slow companies down, sometimes to a degree they find unacceptable.
There is no evidence yet that identify thieves are using the data stolen from Anthem, it said. On Thursday, investigators began to focus on links to a group in China. Although the investigation remains in its early stages, the Anthem hack relied on malware and tools that have been used almost exclusively by Chinese cyberspies, investigators said.
More here:
There is roll up coverage here:

Details emerge in Anthem hack

February 6, 2015 | By Katie Dvorak
The healthcare industry, which lags behind others when it comes to cybersecurity, now faces what is shaping up to be the largest breach of healthcare data in history. 
Hackers broke into health insurer Anthem's database, obtaining the personal information of about 80 million consumers, including names, birth dates, addresses, email addresses, employment information and Social Security/member identification numbers.
Members' Social Security numbers were not encrypted, according to a Wall Street Journal article that cites an anonymous source familiar with the breach. Encrypting the information would have made it more difficult for hackers to access and sell, according to the article. 
The company believes a hacker group used a stolen employee password to access the database, the article said.
Who's behind the attack?
The perpetrators are not yet known, although an FBI-led investigation is underway. There's speculation that a Chinese state-sponsored hacker group might be behind the breach, according to a Bloomberg article, which also cites anonymous sources.
"The attack appears to follow a pattern of thefts of medical data by foreigners seeking a pathway into the personal lives and computers of a select group," the article said.
China has denied having anything to do with the attack, according to an article in the Bangkok Post--foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei called the accusations "groundless."
More here:
This has to be the mother of health information breaches. It seems as though it was a sophisticated attack deploying sophisticated malware. That almost 1/4 of the population of the US is involved is amazing!
In Australia I am sure exactly the same vulnerabilities exist in both the health sector and elsewhere as well as a legion of other possible risks.
What is vital here is that companies and services that hold identifiable personal data need to have properly developed plans and to be continuously updating and improving what they are doing.
The potential for damage to businesses and services is very large indeed.
I suspect we have not have major leaks from Australian Health Entities compared with the US probably relates to the relative lack of value in the Australian data compared with the value that can be extracted from US patient identity details.
Before we move to giving everyone a PCEHR record - as is mooted at present - we need to be sure a top notch security plan is in place and under continuous threat review! I wonder, for example, is the PCEHR encrypted properly?
Compulsory significant breach notification (as in the US) also makes a good deal of sense to me.
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 256 – Results – 8th February, 2015.

Here are the results of the poll.

Is It Acceptable That Standards Australia Does Not Have A Program For Continuing Development Of Health IT Standards In 2015 And Beyond?

Yes 2% (2)

Probably 0% (0)

Neutral 1% (1)

Probably Not 11% (14)

No 85% (110)

I Have No Idea 2% (2)

Total votes: 129

An extremely clear response with large majority believing that what is presently happening is not acceptable.

Good to see a clear outcome with a lot of responses.

Again, many, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.