Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, March 31, 2016

It Seems That Victoria Has Had An Exciting Time Over The Last Few Years With Government IT.

This appeared last week:
Benjamin Preiss state political reporter
Published: March 21, 2016 - 3:29PM
Bungled IT systems that were scrapped before launching, or introduced with major flaws, have cost taxpayers almost $900 million.
The splurge by government departments on faulty projects comes despite repeated warnings in recent years about substandard commissioning processes.
Earlier this month Victoria's financial watchdog issued another scathing report on six information communications technology (ICT) projects in the public sector.
Acting Auditor-General Peter Frost said weaknesses in planning and implementation meant projects were often cancelled before completion while still "incurring significant costs".
Now the Andrews government says it is introducing changes to improve management of ICT systems.
A spokesman said the government had "bolstered the rules" for commissioning ICT systems, and will increase the use of independent experts to monitor projects.
The list of costly projects includes the bungled $240 million Ultranet system for schools that was supposed to be used extensively by parents, teachers and students.
The government pulled the plug on the project in 2014 after only a handful of schools adopted it and it has sincebeen the recent focus of an Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission inquiry.
A doomed $62 million ICT system commissioned by the Department of Justice is among the latest projects that failed to launch.
The Age can also reveal the former Department of Primary Industries spent about $25 million on an online project known as the Resource Rights Allocation and Management system.
It was used for just two years before another $3 million was spent to make it compatible with cloud technology.
RMIT computer science expert Andy Song said government IT projects were vulnerable to a range of problems, including mid-project leadership changes.
"A change of management can bring a disastrous result," he said.
Dr Song said IT projects were expensive but could fast become obsolete as new technology takes over.
The HealthSMART system was another expensive project that was supposed to link hospital computer networks and data but was widely criticised for its limited application.
Some estimates have placed its price at $360 million or higher but the Health Department insisted its total capital cost was $329.4 million.
The department did not confirm how many hospitals or health services were now using the system.
More here:
The summary still makes some grim reading.

Digital Dashboard: Status Review of ICT Projects and Initiatives – Phase 2

Tabled: 9 March 2016
This audit is Phase 2 of the 2015 Digital Dashboard: Status Review of ICT Projects and Initiatives. It examined six information and communications technology (ICT) projects to determine if they were appropriately planned, managed and implemented in terms of time, cost, benefits realisation and governance.
The audit confirms that ICT projects continue to show poor planning and implementation with cost and scheduling overruns. While one of the six projects examined finished on schedule, none was or will be completed as initially budgeted. One project was terminated prior to system delivery, six years after its planned completion date and over twice its intended budget. Most of the projects examined faced significant challenges at various points during implementation.
Despite this, the audit saw some elements of better practice at the University of Melbourne and Yarra Valley Water which contributed to project completion.
Clearly defined governance arrangements do not necessarily guarantee a successful ICT project. Agencies should work on developing a robust culture of active governance at the senior management level to make informed decisions and to effectively engage with consultants and vendors.
The audit restates better practice elements from VAGO’s 2008 guide, Investing Smarter in Public Sector ICT, to assist agencies in delivering successful ICT projects.
Here is the link:
While it seems to be the same all over it really seems to be a worry that we keep having these project overruns and failures!
David.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

The Privacy Commissioner Releases A Large Collection Of New Documents On My Health Record.

I noticed these a day or so ago.
They are termed Privacy Fact Sheets and for some reason they are not numbered in a form that seems to make sense but you can use a single link to see them all - or use the list below.

Privacy fact sheets

This section holds fact sheets that give a general overview of a topic or subject area for individuals.
More detailed specific resources for agencies and organisations can be found in Agency resources, Business resources and Guides.
Information about how the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner applies the Privacy Act 1988 can be found in the Privacy law section of this website.
Here is the link:
The important links from the mHR perspective are as follows.
Here is a link that takes you to the relevant sheets directly:
The sheet 15 is very interesting:

Privacy fact sheet 15: Ten tips for protecting the personal information in your My Health Record

March 2016
If you have a My Health Record or are considering whether to get one, this fact sheet explains what to consider over the lifetime of your record.

What is a My Health Record?

A My Health Record is an online summary of your health information, such as medicines you are taking, any allergies you may have and treatments you have received. It was previously known as a Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) or eHealth record.
Your My Health Record allows your doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers (such as physiotherapists) to view your health information, in accordance with your access controls. You are also able to access it online yourself.
In most parts of Australia you need to actively register for a My Health Record. However, people whose registered Medicare address is in Northern Queensland or the Nepean Blue Mountains will have a My Health Record automatically created for them by the Australian Government. If you are registered as living in either of these areas and don’t want a My Health Record, you will need to opt-out by 27 May 2016.
You can use the postcode checker on the My Health Record website to see if your registered Medicare address is in one of these areas. If it is, you should also receive a letter and brochure from the Australian Government with further information.
This fact sheet is for everyone who already has or will soon have a My Health Record and anyone else who is thinking of registering for one. This includes people whose registered Medicare address is in Northern Queensland and the Nepean Blue Mountains region.

1. Read the System Operator’s privacy statement carefully before you opt in

Make sure you understand how the information in your My Health Record can be collected, used and disclosed.
The System Operator is responsible for the operation of the My Health Record system.  You can read the privacy statement, which applies to personal information collected by the System Operator for the My Health Record system, online.
If you have any questions about this, call the System Operator on 1800 723 471.

2. Be aware of the different access settings available to you

Consider setting your access controls as soon as you register for a My Health Record or have one created for you. It’s a good idea to review them regularly, especially if your circumstances change or you begin treatment with a new healthcare provider. Check your ‘access list’ regularly to see who can access your My Health Record. If the default settings are set, you should know what they are and what they could mean for you. Think about whether you want to restrict which healthcare providers can access your record and what information is included.

3. Consider setting advanced access controls and a 'personal access code'

Advanced access controls allow you to restrict which healthcare providers can access your My Health Record. You can also restrict access to particular documents. If you set up a ‘personal access code’, healthcare providers will only be able to check if you have a My Health Record and access it if you give them your code. Personal access controls may be overridden in an emergency, if it is unreasonable or impracticable to obtain your consent.

4. Read the privacy notices and policies of your healthcare providers

Different healthcare providers will have different information management practices. For example, you can restrict which healthcare providers can see your My Health Record but you cannot restrict access by individual staff members. Find out which areas of the healthcare provider will have access to your My Health Record.

5. Talk to your healthcare providers regularly about what information they will be adding to and accessing from your My Health Record. Ask how they will involve you in this process

If you don’t want a certain document added to your My Health Record, make sure you tell your healthcare provider. If they have added a document that you don’t want on your record, ask them to remove it. If they refuse, you can remove it yourself by logging in to your record. You can later ask for it to be restored if you choose.
Documents that have been removed will still be accessible to the healthcare provider that uploaded them through their local IT system. This is because they created the documents and can access them on their own local IT system rather than specifically through your online My Health Record. They may also be retrieved for authorised purposes, such as by order of a court. However, once removed from your My Health Record, they won’t be accessible in an emergency so you should consider whether there is any information that could be needed in such a situation. It’s a good idea to discuss these issues with your healthcare provider.

6. Check your My Health Record access history regularly

Check for any unexpected or unauthorised access. The access history function identifies healthcare provider organisations that have accessed your My Health Record. However, if you want to find out the name of an individual who has accessed your record, you can request this by calling the System Operator on 1800 723 471. The system access history will only include access to your My Health Record. It will not include information about who has accessed information that has been downloaded into a healthcare provider’s local systems.

7. Check your My Health Record regularly to ensure that the documents it contains are kept accurate, up-to-date and complete

If any information is inaccurate, out-of-date or incomplete, ask the healthcare provider that uploaded the information to correct or complete it. If they disagree, you can ask them to attach a statement to the document stating what you consider to be inaccurate, out-of-date or incomplete. If you don’t feel comfortable approaching the healthcare provider directly, you can call the System Operator on 1800 723 471. If it is a private sector healthcare provider organisation that is unwilling to correct or complete your record, you can also make a complaint to the OAIC. Old versions of documents will still be retained by the system. If there are any important documents that you think should be included on your My Health Record, talk to your healthcare provider.

8. Secure your My Health Record

Make sure you set a strong password and don’t share it with anyone else. If you are accessing your My Health Record via the online consumer portal, ensure that the device and connection you use to access your  record is secure. For example, you should install reputable anti-spyware, anti-virus scanners and firewall software and avoid unsecured wi-fi networks. General advice to help you keep your information safe online is available at staysmartonline.gov.au.

9. Exercise your privacy rights

The My Health Record system is protected by the My Health Records Act 2012 (My Health Records Act). The protections in the My Health Records Act are in addition to those under existing privacy legislation. Once information is downloaded into a healthcare provider’s local records, existing privacy legislation will apply. There are civil and criminal penalties for individuals and healthcare provider organisations who don’t comply with the My Health Records Act. If you suspect that the information in your My Health Record may have been mishandled, you can complain to the entity involved or call the System Operator on 1800 723 471. If you’re not happy with their response, you can complain to the OAIC.

10. Remember you can choose to cancel at any time

If you decide to cancel your My Health Record, call the System Operator on 1800 723 471 and ask to have your record deactivated. It can be reactivated again later if you choose.
If you cancel your My Health Record, no one will be able to see it (including yourself) and no further information can be added onto it.
Information in the cancelled record will be stored by the System Operator until 30 years after your death, or 130 years after your date of birth (if the date of death is unknown_.

More information

For more information on the OAIC’s role in the My Health Record system, please see the OAIC’s Privacy fact sheet 18: The OAIC and the My Health Record system
----- End Sheet.
What strikes me about this is just how complex the information provided is and how unlikely the vast number of people would be to take all this information on board and act on it, sound though the information seems to be.
Given a million people are going to get one of these records in the next few months - one really wonders just how well informed the ‘man on the Bondi Tram’ will actually be about what is happening and what risks there are to their privacy - and potentially to their career, employment among other things.
I really don’t think Australians have been properly alerted to the risks inherent in this giant government system having so much of your health information.
I look forward to comments on all these sheets.
David.

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Dear Oh Dear! There Seems To Be Angst Regarding The SA EPAS Program.

This appeared a few days ago:

No end in sight for loathed electronic record system

18 March 2016
SA HEALTH is ploughing ahead with a much-maligned platform for electronic records that has been blamed for inducing “rage attacks” in clinicians.
Doctors remain concerned that the $422 million Electronic Patient Administration System (EPAS) remains user-unfriendly, despite assurances that bugs have been ironed out.
“The EPAS system will continue to evolve and improve over time and SA Health remains committed to working closely with our clinicians’ support (for) the roll out of EPAS”, SA Health told Medical Observer in a statement.
The Flinders and Far North Doctors Association (FFNDA) wrote to the department in January arguing that the system should be overhauled or junked.
“We would like to remind you again that the overwhelming majority of us work primarily as general practitioners, working in private practices,  that use electronic records 100% of the time,” the letter said. 
“We have for years embraced electronic medical records and their expected efficiencies. EPAS has been extremely disappointing in not delivering these efficiencies as would be expected of a contemporary program.
“Therefore, we ask again – please take EPAS away and completely remodel it into a more user-friendly, efficient and safe interface. Or, if that is not possible please replace EPAS with something much better.”
Earlier, in 2014, the group advised the department that the system caused “rage attacks” among clinicians and some doctors were refusing to work with it.
EPAS has been on trial for more than two years at Port Augusta hospital using consultants from Adelaide and the local GP workforce. 
“It had many teething problems that drove clinicians completely mad,” Dr Peter Rieschbieth, a vice president of the SA Rural Doctors Association tells MO.
“This was relayed to us because rural doctors are contracted to work in hospitals required to work with EPAS.”
The GP says he has not heard one clinician back up the department’s claim that the bugs have been ironed out.
However, senior doctors were reportedly giving their passwords to junior doctors or students, asking them to input data on their behalf.  
“Across the board, clinicians have been saying it’s not user-friendly, it takes much longer to use. Fewer patients are seen at outpatients, fewer patients are being operated on, because you spend so much time on it.” 
More angst outlined here:
What to say? While I am sure there are two sides to this story, at least to some degree, it is clear things are simply not working out with this implementation.
It would be good to see some Government commentary on just where this project is up to and just how the new Royal Adelaide Hospital is going to be provided with working and clinically acceptable IT - along with relevant plans for all the other large hospitals which seem also to now be all that happy.
It’s about time the Minister hopped out of his apparent state of denial and sorted all this out.
David.

Monday, March 28, 2016

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 28th March, 2016.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Quite an interesting week with cyber-threats of all sorts catching the headlines and again some private sector activity.
I hope all enjoyed the Easter break!
-----

Alert raised over cyber attacks on medical devices

Jo Hartley | 23 March, 2016 | 
The Australian Prime Minister falls to the floor clutching his chest as cybercriminals play power games with his pacemaker. A final flip of the remote and he’s dead.
It makes for gripping TV, but could this Homeland scene really happen?
Yes, says cybersecurity expert Dr Robert Merkel (PhD), an IT researcher at Monash University, Melbourne.
Dr Merkel is speaking with Australian Doctor following the release of a TGA alert advising medical device makers and hospitals to carry out IT assessments to determine the risk of cyber attack.
-----

US hospital pays $24k ransom after cyber attack locks medical records

Date February 19, 2016

Justin Wm. Moyer

Obama's new budget to fix 'ancient' technology

The eighth and final budget is announced by President Barack Obama, and it includes a $19 billion boost in cyber security funding aimed at replacing insecure and 'downright ancient' systems.
Not too long ago, taking the United States' wild, messy, unreliable system of medical records online seemed like a worthy goal.
"To improve the quality of our health care while lowering its cost, we will make the immediate investments necessary to ensure that, within five years, all of America's medical records are computerised," President Obama said. "This will cut waste, eliminate red tape and reduce the need to repeat expensive medical tests."
While the shift Obama and many others pushed may have improved care, electronic medical records led to quite the unique hostage situation in Los Angeles this week. There, a hospital fell prey to a cyberattack — and has escaped its plight by paying hackers a $US17,000 ($23,740) ransom.
-----

Privacy fact sheet 47: Young people and the My Health Record system (Northern Queensland and Nepean Blue Mountains)

Note: This fact sheet applies only to people living in the Northern Queensland and Nepean Blue Mountains areas
March 2016
In June 2016, people whose registered Medicare address is in the Northern Queensland or Nepean Blue Mountains Primary Health Networks will have a My Health Record created for them. This includes young people under the age of 18. This fact sheet explains how young people can take control of and manage their My Health Record, and how an authorised representative (such as a parent) can manage a My Health Record on a young person’s behalf. This includes how to opt a young person out of a My Health Record so that a record is not created for them.
This fact sheet is for people whose registered Medicare address is in the Northern Queensland and Nepean Blue Mountains Primary Health Networks. It should be read together with the OAIC’s Privacy fact sheet 46: My Health Record system – What to expect in Northern Queensland and Nepean Blue Mountains.
-----

Australian industry lashes out at data breach notification scheme

Businesses complain of unclear obligations, broad scope.

By Allie Coyne
Mar 23 2016 10:02AM
Australian businesses say they are not sold on the government's proposed mandatory data breach notification scheme, with some even going so far as to call for it to be abandoned.
Late last year the government released an exposure draft of its long-awaited bill for the scheme, outlining what it considers a serious breach and the steps an organisation must take in response to one. 
It defines a serious breach as unauthorised access to, disclosure or loss of customer information which generates a real risk of serious harm to individuals.
After an entity is aware or "ought to have been aware" a serious breach has occured, it must notify customers, the Privacy Commissioner, and potentially the media "as soon as practicable".
-----

Mixed reception for data breach notification scheme

Case for scheme has not been made, some industry orgs argue
There has been a mixed reception from business to a draft government bill that would implement a mandatory data breach notification scheme.
The government in in December released an exposure draft of a bill to implement a data breach notification regime.
The government had committed to the introduction of such a scheme as part of its response to concerns about the mandatory data retention scheme for telcos, which began operation in October.
The release of the exposure draft late in the year represented backtracking by the government, which had originally committed to legislating a scheme in 2015.
-----

One million South Island electronic referrals

Health Minister Jonathan Coleman says one million electronic referrals to specialists have been successfully processed in the South Island.
The South Island Electronic Request Management System allows general practice teams to submit requests for specialist advice direct to a secure database of over 700 specialists.
“More than a million South Islanders have had access to timely specialist advice as a result of the eReferrals system,” says Dr Coleman.
-----
IT bungles cost taxpayers hundreds of millions

Benjamin Preiss state political reporter
Published: March 21, 2016 - 3:29PM
Bungled IT systems that were scrapped before launching, or introduced with major flaws, have cost taxpayers almost $900 million.
The splurge by government departments on faulty projects comes despite repeated warnings in recent years about substandard commissioning processes.
Earlier this month Victoria's financial watchdog issued another scathing report on six information communications technology (ICT) projects in the public sector.
-----

Delays to NBN rollout could hinder new health services

21st Mar 2016 6:00 AM
QUEENSLANDERS are embracing new telehealth services enabled by better access to fast broadband to better manage family health from home, according to a new report released today.
The NBN Digital Health At Home Report, shows 72 per cent of respondents living in regional or rural Australia have delayed a visit to a GP, with reasons for this including to prevent wasting time, losing money and having to take days off work.
With a number of regional Queenslanders having to travel significant distances for specialist healthcare, the research highlights how access to fast broadband and telehealth services (such as GP video conferencing and in-home monitoring for the elderly) can help time-poor Aussies manage family health from home.
-----

How to improve the recording of requested appointments

23 March 2016
To improve clinical software, we look at recording the requested appointment and provide two vendor responses.
THE ISSUE?
PATIENTS usually have preferences about when they wish to be seen at the practice and by whom. General practices currently have no way to monitor how well they are satisfying those wishes, because their electronic appointment systems record only the appointment that was given and not the appointment that was requested.
PROPOSED SOLUTION
The patient should be asked to state their ‘ideal appointment’ — the one that would best suit their needs and preferences.
To achieve this, the practice’s appointment software should prompt the receptionist, or the patient who is using the practice’s online appointment system, for answers to as many of the following questions as matter to the patient
-----

Australian Doctor launches online dermatology hub

Guest writer | 22 March, 2016 | 
Sponsored
With one in 10 patient consultations related to a skin complaint and one third of the general population suffering with a skin ailment within the past fortnight, the demand among GPs for quality independent dermatology information has never been so great.
To keep GPs abreast of the latest clinical developments, Australian Doctor has launched a new website, ‘Clinical Hub’ focussing initially on all things skin.
The hub, which has been unlocked for doctors with an unconditional educational grant from Bayer, delivers a range of content – from in depth clinical articles on diagnosis and treatment to practical patient case studies, videos and quizzes to test your clinical knowledge.
-----

ASX-listed 3D Medical makes AU$60m hospital data play

3D Medical has acquired US diagnostic image management company Mach7 Technologies in a AU$60 million deal that will see the Australian company take on the global hospital market.
By Asha Barbaschow | March 22, 2016 -- 04:58 GMT (15:58 AEDT) | Topic: Big Data Analytics
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)-listed 3D Medical has scooped up US-based Mach7 Technologies in a bid to bolster the global presence of its vendor neutral diagnostic technology.
According to Dr Nigel Finch, chairman of the Melbourne-based 3D printing firm, the AU$60 million acquisition gives 3D Medical monopoly of the global marketplace, with hospitals previously locked into sticking with a single vendor for their diagnostic machines.
Finch said that within a hospital, there is a rich set of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, which is stored as its own file format. This DICOM data is created each time an X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computerised axial tomography (CAT) scan is performed, with Finch saying this data is often completely siloed.
-----

GP2U: Smartphone app brings the doctor to your phone

  • The Australian
  • March 24, 2016 12:00AM

Chris Griffith

A new kid on the block in telehealth medicine is sailing in uncharted waters.
Fire up a smartphone app and you’re on your way to visiting a virtual clinic, even waiting in a virtual waiting room, before your appointment with a GP or specialist possibly thousands of kilometres away.
GP2U is one of a new breed of GP online clinics that offers this. Telehealth is a well-established practice for healthcare in remote locations. Now it’s available to city folk, too.
Being able to videoconference with your doctor on your smartphone or via a weblink is of obvious value to immobile people, those without transport, the elderly and parents facing logistic difficulties getting kids to the doctor.
But does this compromise medicine delivery?
For younger, tech-savvy generations, it’s about convenience and saving time. This is new age medicine for the millennials and gen Y parents. Squeezing in an online consultation during a busy workday without leaving the office, or on the phone in the train, has its appeal.
This new era of mobile and PC-connected consultations goes further than video chat. It takes in patients using blood pressure dev­ices capable of uploading data to the doctor. And there are apps that help patients take photos of their skin for uploading to a skin cancer specialist.
-----

Illusion or reality? Does SMS messaging really help the medicine go down?

March 24, 2016 2.40am AEDT

Author David Glance

Director of UWA Centre for Software Practice, University of Western Australia
Mobile health solutions or mHealth encompasses all of the technology and software that combined with mainly smartphones, provide individuals to measure, record, monitor, analyse and report the state of their health. The ultimate aim of course is to keep people well and to help them to get better in the event of illness.
It is easy with mHealth to confuse the enormous potential for technology to bring about change, with its actual ability to do so. Whilst the advances in connected devices and the promise of technology such as Google’s smart contact lenses that will monitor blood sugar levels of diabetics, there is very little evidence that these devices will bring about significant changes in the outcomes that matter, namely an improvement in the health of the person using the device.
The problem with research in this area is that mHealth is such a broad area, covering such a large range of technologies that are applied to a large range of uses. Whilst it is entirely possible that an app on a mobile phone could help in the management of a very specific condition, being able to determine this experimentally is very difficult. There are few rigorous “randomised controlled trials” involving mHealth and those that have been conducted confirm the difficulty of drawing definite conclusions from the promise of this technology.
-----

Electronic Medication Management

The Commission focuses on the electronic future for medicines management. It makes available a range of resources to assist health service organisations and health professionals safely implement and use electronic medication management.

National guidelines for on-screen display of clinical medicines information

The Commission has worked with the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA) and the Australian Government Department of Health to develop national guidelines for standardised presentation of on-screen medicines information to ensure benefit from investments in e-health initiatives and to maximise patient safety.
The guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to on-screen presentation of medicines information, incorporate Australia’s National Tall Man Lettering, and build on Australia’s Recommendations for terminology, abbreviations and symbols used in the prescribing and administration of medicines.
-----

NBN launches Digital Diagnosis, releases telehealth report

Respondents to an NBN survey have said that access to telehealth would be convenient, save money and time, and provide more options for those living in regional areas.
By Corinne Reichert | March 21, 2016 -- 01:24 GMT (12:24 AEDT) | Topic: NBN
The company responsible for rolling out the National Broadband Network (NBN) across Australia has released a research paper on e-health, spruiking the benefits of using high-speed broadband for monitoring health and conducting telehealth conferences with doctors.
NBN's guide to health in the home: How fast broadband is helping to connect us to anytime, anywhere healthcare [PDF] was commissioned by NBN and conducted by market research agency Colmar Brunton.
The report was released as part of NBN's new Digital Diagnosis program, which exists primarily to push broadband -- or, more specifically, the NBN -- as a health enabler.
-----

GPs warned about privacy risks with patient images

21 March 2016
GPs who email images of patients' conditions to specialists to seek a better diagnosis have been warned of significant privacy and legal risks.
The practice, known as store-and-forward, is becoming increasingly popular particularly with dermatologists, say research assistant Paul Stevenson and colleagues from the University of Queensland and Brisbane's Princess Alexandra Hospital.
They say doctors should obtain informed patient consent, explaining how the images will be used, applying appropriate digital security to prevent unauthorised access and deleting pictures after saving them to patient health records.
-----

Transforming Health blueprint defended by Minister Jack Snelling amid Opposition criticism

Critics of a wide-ranging plan to transform health services in South Australia to tackle rising costs and forecast patient growth have not put any better proposal to the State Government, Health Minister Jack Snelling says.

Key points:

  • Some critics had their names used without permission, Health Minister says
  • Opposition says original Transforming Health promises had changed
  • Minister Jack Snelling says Government listening to clinicians' views
The Minister told 891 ABC Adelaide that doctors who were vocal opponents of the Transforming Health blueprint were far from representative of all who worked in the state public health system.
"These are not the only medical voices out there, there are in fact medical voices who are supporting the changes we're making," he said.
-----

National burns registry desperate for funding

Charlotte Mitchell
Monday, 21 March, 2016
FUNDING is urgently needed to keep the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) up and running because experts say it is the “foundation stone” for excellence in burns injury care.
Winthrop Professor Fiona Wood, director of the Burns Service of Western Australia, told MJA InSight that “continuously improving outcomes for those unfortunate in suffering burn injury is now possible, but it hinges on the continuation of this data registry”.
She said that thanks to BRANZ, researchers and clinicians have been able to identify key attributes of quality care and transfer this knowledge across the whole country.
However, there is no guaranteed source of funding to preserve and develop this valuable resource.
-----

Diagnosis by unsecured smartphone risks patient confidentiality: researchers

Date March 21, 2016 - 1:03AM

Lisa Yallamas

Doctors who photograph skin conditions using unsecured, personal mobile phones could be breaching patient privacy, new Queensland research warns.
In an article in the Medical Journal of Australia, researchers from the University of Queensland and Princess Alexandra Hospital, led by Paul Stevenson, say using telemedicine for diagnosing dermatological conditions was popular because it sped up treatment and improved patient outcomes, particularly in regional areas where there are few specialists.
However doctors and medical institutions endangered patient privacy, as well as their own indemnity insurance and confidentiality clauses of their employment contracts, if they failed to protect confidential patient records by using unsecured mobile phones and emails.
-----

Half of dermatology discharge summaries inaccurate

Alice Klein | 18 March, 2016 | 
About half of discharge letters from dermatologists omit important information or contain incorrect diagnoses and spelling errors, new research suggests.
The accuracy rate of dermatology discharge summaries is only 55%, according to a retrospective analysis of 219 dermatology inpatient discharge summaries at St George Hospital, Sydney, in 2013.
About 30% of summaries failed to report whether a skin biopsy had been performed, 40% did not document the diagnosis, and more than 60% failed to report differential diagnoses.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Sunday, March 27, 2016

Now This Is Pretty Ominous News But I Am Not Sure What We Can Do About It!

This appeared a little while ago:

Thousands of medical devices are vulnerable to hacking, security researchers say

The security flaws put patients' health at risk
Next time you go for an MRI scan, remember that the doctor might not be the only one who sees your results.
Thousands of medical devices, including MRI scanners, x-ray machines and drug infusion pumps, are vulnerable to hacking, creating significant health risks for patients, security researchers said this week.
The risks arise partly because medical equipment is increasingly connected to the Internet so that data can be fed into electronic patient records systems, said researcher Scott Erven [cq], who presented his findings with fellow researcher Mark Collao [cq] at the DerbyCon security conference.
Besides the privacy concerns, there are safety implications if hackers can alter people's medical records and treatment plans, Erven said.
"As these devices start to become connected, not only can your data gets stolen but there are potential adverse safety issues," he said.
The researchers located medical devices by searching for terms like "radiology" and "podiatry" in Shodan, a search engine for finding Internet-connected devices.
Some systems were connected to the Internet by design, others due to configuration errors. And much of the medical gear was still using the default logins and passwords provided by manufacturers.
The researchers studied public documentation intended to be used to set up the equipment and found some frighteningly lapse security practices.
The same default passwords were used over and over for different models of a device, and in some cases a manufacturer warned customers that if they changed default passwords they might not be eligible for support. That's apparently because support teams needed the passwords to service the systems.
The researchers focused on equipment from GE Healthcare, but they said they could have picked any company. GE is "one of the more progressive" vendors and responded quickly when the flaws were pointed out, they said.
…..
On the plus side, there was no evidence the hackers had targeted the devices specifically because they looked like medical systems, Collao said, but they're still being targeted.
"Next time you're in a hospital getting hooked up to a machine and you see an Ethernet cable going to the wall, it makes you think twice."
More here:
Love the last paragraph - but I am not sure just what the patient can do. Clearly it is the equipment manufacturers are the ones who need to save us from all the risks here. A few news stories of things going wrong will be the best tool to foster change and our safety.
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 313 – Results – 27th March, 2016.

Here are the results of the poll.

Do You Believe The Government Can Be Trusted To Properly Protect And Secure The Private Health Information Of Citizens In The mHR?

Yes 5% (7)

No 95% (138)

I Have No Idea 1% (1)

Total votes: 146

A really decisive poll. Again it seems there is a considerable lack of trust in the DoH to keep our information safe and secure.

Again Ms Ley should take careful notice!

Really great turnout of votes!

Again, many, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.