Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, October 14, 2016

This Is A Rather Ominous Piece Of News Which Needs A Prompt Response.

I noted this last week.

New insulin pump flaws highlights security risks from medical devices

Attackers exploit flaws in the Animas OneTouch Ping insulin pump system to deliver dangerous insulin doses
Lucian Constantin (IDG News Service) 05 October, 2016 07:09
Medical device manufacturer Animas, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, is warning diabetic patients who use its OneTouch Ping insulin pumps about security issues that could allow hackers to deliver unauthorized doses of insulin.
The vulnerabilities were discovered by Jay Radcliffe, a security researcher at Rapid7 who is a Type I diabetic and user of the pump. The flaws primarily stem from a lack of encryption in the communication between the device's two parts: the insulin pump itself and the meter-remote that monitors blood sugar levels and remotely tells the pump how much insulin to administer.
The pump and the meter use a proprietary wireless management protocol through radio frequency communications that are not encrypted. This exposes the system to several attacks.
First, passive attackers can snoop on the traffic and read the blood glucose results and insulin dosage data. Then, they can trivially spoof the meter to the pump because the key used to pair the two devices is transmitted in clear text.
"This vulnerability can be used to remotely dispense insulin and potentially cause the patient to have a hypoglycemic reaction," the Rapid7 researchers said in a blog post.
A third issue is that the pump lacks protection against so-called relay attacks, where a legitimate command is intercepted and then is played back by the attacker at a later time. This allows attackers to perform an insulin bolus without special knowledge, the researchers said.
Lots more here:
There is also coverage on Reuters:
Tue Oct 4, 2016 | 3:58pm EDT

J&J warns diabetic patients: Insulin pump vulnerable to hacking

Johnson & Johnson is telling patients that it has learned of a security vulnerability in one of its insulin pumps that a hacker could exploit to overdose diabetic patients with insulin, though it describes the risk as low.
Medical device experts said they believe it was the first time a manufacturer had issued such a warning to patients about a cyber vulnerability, a hot topic in the industry following revelations last month about possible bugs in pacemakers and defibrillators.
J&J executives told Reuters they knew of no examples of attempted hacking attacks on the device, the J&J Animas OneTouch Ping insulin pump. The company is nonetheless warning customers and providing advice on how to fix the problem.
"The probability of unauthorized access to the OneTouch Ping system is extremely low," the company said in letters sent on Monday to doctors and about 114,000 patients who use the device in the United States and Canada.
"It would require technical expertise, sophisticated equipment and proximity to the pump, as the OneTouch Ping system is not connected to the internet or to any external network."
A copy of the text of the letter was made available to Reuters.
Insulin pumps are medical devices that patients attach to their bodies that injects insulin through catheters.
The Animas OneTouch Ping, which was launched in 2008, is sold with a wireless remote control that patients can use to order the pump to dose insulin so that they do not need access to the device itself, which is typically worn under clothing and can be awkward to reach.
Jay Radcliffe, a diabetic and researcher with cyber security firm Rapid7 Inc, said he had identified ways for a hacker to spoof communications between the remote control and the OneTouch Ping insulin pump, potentially forcing it to deliver unauthorized insulin injections.
Lots more here:
Clearly this is a serious problem and not one to be ignored.
Interestingly there is a useful idea on reducing the risk from Australia.

Why health implants should have open source code

October 4, 2016 6.14am AEDT

Author

James H. Hamlyn-Harris
Senior Lecturer, Computer Science and Software Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology
As medical implants become more common, sophisticated and versatile, understanding the code that runs them is vital. A pacemaker or insulin-releasing implant can be lifesaving, but they are also vulnerable not just to malicious attacks, but also to faulty code.
For commercial reasons, companies have been reluctant to open up their code to researchers. But with lives at stake, we need to be allowed to take a peek under the hood.
Over the past few years several researchers have revealed lethal vulnerabilities in the code that runs some medical implants. The late Barnaby Jack, for example, showed that pacemakers could be “hacked” to deliver lethal electric shocks. Jay Radcliffe demonstrated a way of wirelessly making an implanted insulin pump deliver a lethal dose of insulin.
But “bugs” in the code are also an issue. Researcher Marie Moe recently discovered this first-hand, when her Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) unexpectedly went into “safe mode”. This caused her heart rate to drop by half, with drastic consequences.
It took months for Moe to figure out what went wrong with her implant, and this was made harder because the code running in the ICD was proprietary, or closed-source. The reason? Reverse-engineering closed-source code is a crime under various laws, including the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998. It is a violation of copyright, theft of intellectual property, and may be an infringement of patent law.

Why researchers can’t just look at the code

Beyond legal restrictions, there’s another reason why researchers can’t just look at the source code in the same way you might take apart your lawnmower. It takes a very talented programmer using expensive software to reverse-engineer code into something readable. Even then, it’s also not a very exact process.
To understand why, it helps to know a bit about how companies create and ship software.
Software starts as a set of requirements – software must do this; it must look like that; it must have these buttons. Next, the software is designed – this component is responsible for these operations, it passes data to that component, and so on. Finally, a coder writes the instructions to tell the computer how to create the components and in detail how they work. These instructions are all the source code – human-readable instructions using English-like verbs (read, write, exit) mixed with a variety of symbols which the programmer and the computer both understand.
Up to this point, the source code is easily understood by a human. But this isn’t the end of the process. Before software is shipped it goes through one final transformation – it is converted to machine code. It now looks like just a lot of numbers. The source code is gone, replaced by the machine code. It’s now a bit like the inside of your car stereo; it “contains no serviceable parts”. Users are not supposed to mess with the machine code.
The full article is found here:
I suspect with what is described above James has just added a very strong additional plank to his argument!
Have anyone seen a plan / comment from the Therapeutic Good Administration on what their plans are in this domain and how they plan to prevent any problems – especially that many of the devices mentioned here are regulated by them.
David.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

The Macro View – Health And Political News Relevant To E-Health And Health In General.

October 13  Edition.
Parliament has now come back and there will be a lot of things being discussed on the economic front. The scale of Australian and Global debt is certainly getting attention from all sorts of people including the IMF and the BIS.
The world economy continues to feel a little fragile with concerns regarding Europe and China certainly uppermost.
Australia is seemingly pretty good at present, while subject to global winds and who knows where would wind up if some wheels come off overseas.
Most useful this week has been the following from Croakey.

7 key messages from the AIHW Health Expenditure Report

Editor: Jennifer Doggett Author: Jennifer Doggett on: October 07, 2016
This week the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare released its Health expenditure Australia 2014–15 report.
This document contains a wealth of information about the way in which we allocate resources across our health system.
There are many interesting stories in this data which can help us understand how our health system works and what we can do to improve it.
In the piece below, Croakey moderator Jennifer Doggett identifies seven key points from the report that are relevant to current health policy issues.

Jennifer Doggett writes:

  1. We care about health care: The overall expenditure data shows that we spent $161.6 billion on health goods and services in 2014–15. This represents 10% of our GDP. Internationally this puts Australia as just over OECD median for health expenditure (as a percentage of GDP).
We don’t have a mechanism for assessing whether this level of expenditure reflects the priorities of the Australian community so it is impossible to know whether or not current expenditure levels are in line with community expectations.
But it’s fair to say that anything we spend 10% of our collective resources on represents a high priority for our community and, given this, it is important to make sure we are allocating these resources to achieve the best possible outcomes.
  1. There is no spending crisis: While governments like to talk about a ‘crisis’ in health spending, the data shows that we are easily managing the growth in health spending.
The $161.6 billion that we spent in 2014-15 is $4.4 billion (2.8%) higher than in the previous year. This is a relatively small increase and the third consecutive year that growth was below the 10-year average of 4.6%.  In fact, the ratio of government health expenditure to tax revenue remained relatively stable over the 3 years to 2014–15, increasing only by 0.2 percentage points to 24.8%.
  1. “Private” health care is not really private. Governments are the source of funding for around 67% of the Australian health system (41% Commonwealth and 26% States and Territories) and this funding flows through to both public and private health services.
Most “private” health services in our health system e.g. GPs, many allied health providers and private hospitals, receive substantial amounts of funding from public sources (including via Medicare and the private health insurance rebate).
Politicians and the media like to talk about a ‘public’ and a ‘private’ health system as though they were two separate entities. The funding data in the AIHW report demonstrates just how linked these two ‘systems’ are.
Lots more follows and it is a useful summary.
On the world front…

Global Economy Remains Mired in Swamp of Low Growth

Eswar Prasad and Karim Foda Sunday, October 2, 2016
Editor's Note:
This commentary is based on research and analysis from the October 2016 update of Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery (TIGER) interactive map, which appears on the Financial Times Web site.
In true Sisyphean fashion, the world economy is faltering yet again, unable to gain much elevation and sliding back into the low growth morass it has been stuck in for some time. Major advanced and emerging market economies appear to be converging to a low growth environment characterized by weak investment, stagnant productivity, and tepid private sector confidence.
The Brookings-FT Tiger index presents a picture of general despondency in the global economy that more than offsets isolated signs of strength in some economic indicators in a few countries. A strong adverse feedback loop has set in with low growth, fragile business and consumer confidence, low interest rates, financial system stresses, trade tensions, and political instability feeding into and reinforcing each other.
----- Enough said.
Here are a few other things I have noticed.
-----

Budget Issues.

  • October 3 2016 - 5:52AM

How Treasury could help the government be smarter

Ross Gittins
Has it occurred to you that, with the Reserve Bank now run by Dr Philip Lowe and his deputy Dr Guy Debelle, Glenn Stevens may have been the last governor we'll see without a PhD?
All Stevens and his predecessor, Ian Macfarlane, could manage was a master's degree.
Of course, nothing is certain. After Dr Ken Henry was succeeded as Treasury secretary by Dr Martin Parkinson, I convinced myself the era of PhD-only secretaries had arrived at Treasury.
Wrong. It didn't occur to me that Tony Abbott would intervene, sacking Parkinson and replacing him with John Fraser (honours degree), a throwback to Treasury's (John) Stone Age.
-----

Corruption in daycare costs taxpayers $1bn

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 4, 2016

Rick Morton

Corrupt family daycare providers have defrauded taxpayers of more than $1 billion in just two years through systemic rorting that Education Minister Simon Birmingham has compared with Labor’s failed home insulation and school halls stimulus schemes.
Leaked documents obtained by The Australian reveal for the first time the state of crisis in family daycare, which is unfolding at such speed that Victoria proposed stopping all new federal government subsidies in a bid to get on top of the issue.
A copy of an agenda item from the most recent education ministers’ council reveals that 15 people have been arrested, 13 of whom have been charged, in relation to alleged fraud in the past 10 months, with fears stolen money could have been sent to ­Islamic State and other terrorist groups.
-----

NSW debt-free after surprise budget revision

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 6, 2016

Mark Coultan

NSW is officially debt-free, following a revision of the state’s budget surplus.
The NSW government’s surplus has been revised upwards by $1.3 billion to a record $4.7bn for the past financial year, the general government state accounts will reveal today.
That means the general government sector was cash positive by $57 million at June 30. The state’s improved financial position is due to a series of privatisations, including the sale of ports, desalination plant, and the electricity business Transgrid, by the O’Farrell and Baird governments.
The state’s financial position should further improve if the Baird government can sell 50 per cent of its electricity distribution business Ausgrid, the tender for which was blocked by federal Treasurer Scott Morrison over concerns about Chinese bidders.
-----

Big four underpin resilience, says Scott Morrison

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 7, 2016

Adam Creighton

Scott Morrison has heaped praise on Australia’s big four banks in a speech to finance professionals in New York, declaring them crucial to Australia’s economic success in a speech that made no mention of their parliamentary grilling in Canberra.
Visiting New York ahead of International Monetary Fund meetings in Washington, the Treasurer told an elite audience of financiers and businesspeople that Australia’s banks were among the best capitalised and regulated in the world, highlighting a 7.4 per cent jump in loans to businesses over the past year. “The major Australian banks … have remained profitable — far preferable to the alternative — and significantly more so than most of their inter­national peers in the US, Japan and Europe,” he said.
He told The Australian later: “They’ve never been popular, but if you had to point to something that’s underpinned our resilience in times of deep stress … it was those banks.
-----

Health Budget Issues.

Taskforce’s Medicare payments review ‘ready within weeks’

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 5, 2016

Sean Parnell

The Turnbull government will be able to make a decision on the future of the Medicare payments system within weeks, according to newly released briefing notes.
Departmental briefing notes, prepared for Health Minister Sussan Ley and obtained under freedom-of-information laws, provide fresh insight into the work of the secretive Digital Payments Services Taskforce.
The taskforce, aided by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Boston Consulting, has been examining how the government should make various health and aged-care payments, given existing computer systems are prone to failure and stifle reform efforts.
But the taskforce’s existence fuelled Labor’s “Mediscare” campaign, as the Liberals dubbed it, and opposition warnings that Medicare would be sold, privatised or destroyed by the Coalition.
-----
Media release Thursday, 6 October 2016

Funding challenge shadows Health Care Homes

The impact of the extended Medicare freeze is adding to uncertainty about the feasibility of the Government’s Health Care Homes (HCH) plan, the Consumers Health Forum says.
“We have strongly welcomed the Government’s announcement of a “revolution” in primary care enabled by Health Care Homes because it holds the promise of better integrated, patient-focused care.  This shift in the way primary care is coordinated and delivered will also benefit the sustainability and effectiveness of our health care arrangements in the longer term: countries with the highest performing health systems have a strong primary health care backbone.  
However we are concerned that the level of funding to support service delivery as well as the changes required to put in place this new model and the risk of a decline in bulk billing caused by the Medicare freeze combine to pose barriers to the success of the scheme,” the CEO of the Consumers Health Forum, Leanne Wells says.
-----

The health care revolution that will see Aussies enrol with a GP for all their medical needs — but not everyone is happy about it

Sue Dunlevy, National Health Reporter, News Corp Australia Network
October 2, 2016 10:00pm
EXCLUSIVE
DOCTORS will be paid just $8.90 extra per patient per month to deliver a revolutionary new system of care that will see patients enrolled with a single medical practice.
The health care home model being touted as the solution to Medicare’s woes is so underfunded GPs will need an extra $100,000 per practice per year to make it work, doctors say.
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners president Dr Bastian Seidel says the $21 million budgeted for the program isn’t even new money, it is being taken from other GP payments.
“For $8.90 I get a pack of Band-Aids but I can’t comprehensively look after my patients, how am I meant to do that?” he says.
-----

Improving general practice: the self-care model

Authored by Joseph Ting
GPs are widely used in Australia and are the first point of contact for health issues including short term illness, preventive health care, childhood vaccination, and management of chronic disease. They provide health education, advise on healthy living, deal with illness that can be managed at home and do minor surgical procedures.
A patient-centred care model requires GPs to be well placed to implement public health and preventive strategies that will reduce the 40% premature mortality determined by unhealthy lifestyle choices and the 15% attributable to adverse psychosocial and family factors. As GPs are central to ambulatory and long term care of their local communities, they need to understand and address the upstream determinants of downstream sickness.
-----

TGA boss warns about streamlining approvals

Health Minister Sussan Ley plans extensive reforms
  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 4, 2016

Sarah-Jane Tasker

The head of the Therapeutic Goods Administration, John Skerritt, has warned that federal government reforms to streamline approvals of medicines and medical devices will be “harder than we think” to implement, as he argues other countries are yet to agree to share information to aid faster domestic approvals.
Professor Skerritt, a deputy secretary at the federal Health Department, said implementation of the reforms, announced last month by Health Minister Sussan Ley, would be “complex”.
“It won’t be impossible, but we need to think it through,” he told device manufacturers at a recent industry event in Sydney.
He said moving from a couple of different pathways to bring products to Australia to many different pathways, which the reforms proposed, created complexities that had to be managed.
-----

Spike in aged care complaints

- on October 5, 2016, 5:36 pm
There have been over 2000 formal complaints about Australia's aged care system within six months.
It's taken just six months for the new aged care complaints commissioner to be inundated.
More than 5000 people contacted the office with concerns between June 30 and January 1 when it was established, according to its annual report on Wednesday.
About 1600 related to matters outside the commissioner's function, including complaints about retirement villages regulated by the states.
-----

No blowout in healthcare spending, government data shows

Antony Scholefield | 6 October, 2016 |
Federal Government claims that Medicare spending is unsustainable are again under fire, with figures showing the rise in health costs is slowing dramatically
The average increase in the government’s health spending over the past decade has been 4% a year. But between 2013/14 to 2014/15 that increase was just 2.4%.
The amount that Australia as a whole spends on health – including cash from governments, patients and health insurers – was 9.7% of GDP in 2014.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, which compiled the figures, says this compares with 9.4% of GDP in New Zealand, 9.9% in the UK and 10% in Canada.
The US remains the outlier among OECD countries, spending 16.6% of its GDP on health.
-----

Personal health spending: boom in vitamins, supplements, painkillers

Health supplements and vitamins make up a large part of the personal health spend.
  • The Australian
  • 11:59AM October 7, 2016

Sean Parnell

Almost a third of personal health spending is on vitamins, supplements, over-the-counter painkillers and other unsubsidised drugs, according to new figures that chart Australia’s self-medication boom.
The latest expenditure report from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reveals spending on the ‘all other medications’ category hit $9,323 million in 2014-2015, with an unrivalled growth rate of 7.1 per cent a year over the past decade.
The category is responsible for 32.4 per cent of individual spending, more than combined expenditure on dental (19.2 per cent), hospitals (10.6 per cent) and unreferred GP visits (2.4 per cent), which can benefit from government and insurance subsidies. Spending on drugs listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme made up 5.3 per cent of individual expenditure, while other health practitioners, including homeopaths, made up 8.7 per cent.
-----

Health Insurance Issues.

At heart, medical device prices in Australia ‘are unhealthily high’

  • Sarah-Jane Tasker
  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 4, 2016
Australian health insurance funds spent $13.5 million over the past year on a heart pacemaker installed in about 250 patients because the country pays the highest price in the world for that device, produced by US giant Medtronic.
Queenslander John Winsbury is thankful his health fund, Defence Health, picked up the $88,500 bill for his surgery to have a pacemaker and defibrillator installed but is outraged the cost is factored into rising premiums.
Mr Winsbury, a retiree who was previously a member of the army reserves, said it concerned him that the government was not doing enough to force down the costs of devices.
“They are letting us down in a big way … they only look after who is directing them, which is the big companies, big investors or the unions. We are the pawns in the whole thing.”
-----

Health insurance costs ‘distorted’ by structural problems

The growth of older policyholders is greater than young policyholders.
  • The Australian
  • 11:43AM September 30, 2016

Sarah-Jane Tasker

The high number of young people ditching private health insurance is fuelling structural issues in the system, analysts warn, as they argue that government policy is needed to stop the decline.
Macquarie’s healthcare analysts have warned that the current decline in young policyholder participation was not sustainable in a community rated system — where everyone is entitled to buy the same product at the same price, regardless of age and health — in the medium to long term.
The growth of older policyholders is greater than young policyholders, putting pressure on the community rated system. Participation among people below 65 years old has declined in each of the past three quarters.
“Combined with average premium rate increases more than double the rate of income growth, policyholders under 55 years old are paying more and an increasing proportion of all premiums is funding persons over 55 years old,” the investment bank’s team said.
-----

Private health insurers paid hospitals $1 billion

A new report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, to be released today, reveals the latest health spending figures, pointing to an increase in spending by private health insurers.
  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 6, 2016

Sarah-Jane Tasker

Australian private health insurers paid more than $1 billion to public hospitals last year, a jump of almost $100 million on the previous year.
A new report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, to be released today, reveals the latest health spending figures, pointing to an increase in spending by private health insurers.
The report comes as funds battle to keep annual premium increases down in the face of rising affordability concerns by members.
Health insurers have warned federal Health Minister Sussan Ley about cost-shifting from public to private hospitals, which they argue is adding to affordability pressures.
-----

Pharmacy Issues.

“Convenience and accessibility”

An evaluation of the first pharmacist-administered vaccinations in WA has shown positive results for patient and practitioner

A team from Curtin University’s School of Pharmacy has evaluated the first run of influenza vaccinations administered by pharmacists in WA between March and October of 2015.
They approached the study using mixed methods including: surveys; analysing pharmacy computer records; and conducting interviews with immuniser pharmacists.
Between March and October 2015, 15,621 influenza vaccinations were administered by pharmacists at 76 WA pharmacies.
-----

PPA challenges Guild control of CPA negotiations

Professional Pharmacists Australia has called for a new industry-wide panel to take over from the Pharmacy Guild in negotiating future Community Pharmacy Agreements (CPAs).
The panel should consist of representatives from the PPA, the PSA, Guild and the Consumer Health Forum, says the union in its submission to the King Review.
But the Guild is opposed to the idea of opening up negotiations.
In its submission it argues that it is the recognised representative of the majority of community pharmacy owners. And pharmacy owners fund and manage the infrastructure to deliver PBS medications to patients.
-----

Pharmacists defend selling vitamins and supplements

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM October 5, 2016

Sean Parnell

The Pharmacy Guild is staring down critics who claim there is a conflict of interest when vitamins and supplements are sold alongside more rigorously tested and regulated medicines, arguing that consumers want natural therapies and pharmacists should provide them.
In defending the right of pharmacy owners to stock and sell such products, the guild is at odds with the Australian Medical Association, which maintains pharmacists should not be “distracted by retail imperatives, including the sale of comple­mentary medicines that have no basis in evidence”.
The Australian revealed in July the federal government’s Review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation had heard concerns that pharmacists’ professional responsibilities clashed with their role as shopkeepers. The guild, an influential lobby group representing pharmacy owners, insists that doubts over the efficacy of complementary medicines should be addressed by the Therapeutic Goods ­Administration.
-----
I look forward to comments on all this!
-----
David.

It Rather Looks That The Government Needs To Fundamentally Re-Think The Open- Data Release Program.

Last week we heard all about this issue which was covered superbly in the Saturday Paper a few days ago:
Oct 8, 2016

Millions of Australians caught in health records breach

The government’s negotiations with doctors over the Medicare rebate is not helped by a breach of privacy on apparently anonymised health data.
When she addressed the annual conference of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners in Perth last week, Health Minister Sussan Ley was already in a hostile environment.
Doctors are angry at cost-saving measures that are putting pressure on their fees. They believe the government has broken promises, used them as a collective cash cow and left them to pass on higher costs to their patients.
Standing at the podium, Ley surprised the GPs by apologising for something else entirely.
Ley revealed that the health department had inadvertently committed a potentially serious breach of the Privacy Act by deliberately publishing supposedly anonymous Medicare and pharmaceutical claims data involving GPs and three million of their patients.
To help health researchers provide better analysis and contribute to health policy, the department had made public “de-identified” records of claims under the Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for a randomly selected sample of 10 per cent of the Australian population.
But it had also included just enough information about its encryption algorithms to enable a competent code-breaker to unravel the jumbled numbers that replaced doctors’ provider numbers and potentially identify them.
Ley did not explain why, when doctors who discover a privacy breach are obliged to alert those affected immediately, the government waited 16 days. 
It took analysts at the University of Melbourne’s Department of Computing and Information Systems just a few days to do it.
“Yes, there will always be risks, no matter how slight, around the release of any de-identified data,” Ley told the conference last Thursday morning, as she segued to a nothing-to-see-here confession, five minutes into a half-hour speech. “It’s how we manage these risks when they arise that is important.”
Her department’s risk management is now the subject of considerable discussion across government about how the release of information on the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet’s data.gov.au website could have been so badly handled.
Ley revealed that the University of Melbourne researchers had notified her department of “a vulnerability” in the encrypted data on September 8 – the researchers say it was actually September 12 – and “that individual healthcare providers could possibly be re-identified”.
Ley assured doctors there were “no provider names in the dataset” and no patient information had been “compromised”.
Lots more here:
No sooner did we think this has settled down than this news appeared.

Privacy fears over public service data release

Australian Public Service Commission reviews employee census data set
Rohan Pearce (Computerworld)  06 October, 2016 08:49
The Australian Public Service Commission is reviewing a data set it released through the government’s open data portal to ensure that it can’t be used to identify individual government employees.
Fairfax Media yesterday revealed the privacy concerns over the public service employee census data set.
“The APS employee census collects attitudinal data, it is not administrative data and does not collect names or contact details,” an APSC spokesperson said in a statement.
“De-identified and significantly aggregated APS employee census data is published annually on data.gov.au. Respondents are advised of this before completing the survey.”
……
In response to the discovery of the vulnerativlity in the health data sets, Attorney-General George Brandis announced Privacy Act changes that will make it a crime to reidentify ostensibly deidentified government data. His announcement has raised concerns that it could have an impact on cyber security research.
More here:

Govt pulls dataset that jeopardised 96,000 employees

By Allie Coyne on Oct 6, 2016 7:17AM

Downloaded 58 times before being removed.

A second data breach within the federal government in a week has seen a dataset involving 96,000 public servants pulled from public view over privacy concerns.
Fairfax Media reported yesterday that the Australian Public Service Commission had decided to pull the dataset from the government's open data portal data.gov.au over concerns the information could be used to identify individual officers.
The APSC performs a massive yearly employee census to collect attitudinal data that tracks the views of staffers about management and workplace conditions.
While the data collected from the 96,000 public servants does not involve names or contact details, the APSC told iTnews that tweaks to this year's dataset had raised privacy concerns.
For the first time since it started collecting the census in 2003, the APSC this year added a numeric code for each government agency to an individual's responses.
It said agencies were not named and "at no time did the APSC publish individual identifiable information in the public domain".
But it decided to pull the dataset and review the information over concerns matching agency codes to individual responses would make it relatively easy to identify the public service worker who filled out the census.
Lots more here:
As well as here:
  • October 5 2016 - 9:24AM

96,000 public servants in new data breach

Noel Towell
The federal government is caught up in a second data privacy scare, this time involving a massive data-set on more than 96,000 of its public servants amid fears their confidential information might not be secure.
In the second potentially serious Commonwealth data breach to become public in less than a week, the public service's workplace authority has confirmed that it has withdrawn the data gathered in its massive annual employee census from public view.
It is feared that identification codes for departments and agencies could be used to identify the individual public servants who filled in the census, the largest workplace survey undertaken in Australia, on condition of anonymity.
The data has been taken down from official websites to be washed of any features that could be used to breach the privacy of government officials.
But the Australian Public Service Commission has confirmed the data-set was downloaded nearly 60 times before the take-down, meaning the raw information is in circulation with no way to control how it is used or distributed further.
Much more here:
One really wonders what is going on here and how many other IT academics are working to access more of the information the government is / has released.
What is needed here is for the Government to close all the releases down and then publish a proper draft framework for how it is going to move forward and have it fully critiqued by experts here and overseas.
If they don’t I suspect the drip, drip of mistakes will just grow.
David.