Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, December 04, 2017

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 4th December, 2017.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

An interesting week with the ADHA out all over the place. Will be interesting to see how it all plays out…
Otherwise a few other interesting initiatives…
-----

E-health revolution gather pace as more services pledge their backing

  • The Australian
  • 1:00AM December 2, 2017
The e-health revolution is gaining pace as Australia’s largest pathology labs agree to upload reports to patients’ My Health Record and diagnostic imaging providers are set to link up next year.
Last week the Australian Digital Health Agency announced new agreements with pathology companies Primary Health Care and Australian Clinical Labs and seven software vendors and labs, after Sonic Healthcare’s ­decision to sign up to My Health Record.
More than 5.3 million Australians have a My Health ­Record. There was a 400 per cent increase in the number of shared health summaries uploaded in 2016-17 and a 200 per cent rise in links with private hospitals. The new links with ­diag­nostic ­imaging and pathology pro­viders will give clinicians even more reason to be involved and provide a critical mass of information to demonstrate the value of e-health.
-----

Correcting recent but inaccurate media reporting for My Health Record

Posted on 01 December, 2017
Recent articles in the media have raised concerns relating to privacy, security and consumer communications for My Health Record. This media reporting contained a number of false claims and inaccuracies. Tim Kelsey, CEO of the Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) has issued a letter to the editors of each publication that carried this article requesting a correction to the record.
The ADHA has prepared a document which outlines and corrects inaccuracies related to the following issues:
  • Consumer communication activities for opt out in 2018
  • Does My Health Record mean that private health information is available on the ‘open’ internet?
  • Who can view information in My Health Record?
  • Is information in My Health Record available to researchers or for other purposes?
The document also provides contact details, if you have questions or would like additional information.

My Health Record still not worth its $2b investment

A new report shows it has a long way to go
24th November 2017
The future looks grim for the Federal Government’s My Health Record unless its inherent problems are addressed, new figures suggest.
GP groups have been scathing about cost blowouts and its slow implementation - it has taken five years to develop at an estimated cost of $2 billion.
However, take up is painfully slow.
-----

Hardly anyone uses Australia's My Health Record service

Signature policy has cost AU$1.7bn, looks rather sickly

By Richard Chirgwin 29 Nov 2017 at 02:39
One of the Australian government's signature policies, the electronic health record, has been all-but-abandoned by the healthcare sector.
While the AU$1.7 billion spent on the My Health Record system so far has attracted registrations from more than five million Australians, the government's dashboard [PDF] for the system reveals a collapse in the rate of new registrations.
In May 2017, registrations (excluding “bulk registrations”, in which the government creates the record in an opt-out process) peaked at more than 40,000 new users for the month, and the graph below shows the decline since then.
Comments:
-----

It's a Christmas miracle - two secure messaging systems now talk to each other

From last month Argus was able to send messages to ReferralNet and vice versa
Antony Scholefield
30th November 2017
It may be four weeks to Christmas, but a miracle has already occurred: two secure messaging programs used by GPs have started to talk to each other.
Like a grumpy family on Christmas Day, the four main messaging systems have been unable to reconcile their past differences and have been refusing to communicate for many years.
This has forced GPs, at least those doggedly determined to move on from fax machine technology, to invest in multiple software packages so they can conduct the simple business of exchanging clinical information with specialists or hospitals.
-----

Concern grows about the opt-out function as healthcare industries sign up to connect with My Health Record

Lynne Minion | 28 Nov 2017
As the Australian Digital Health Agency endeavours to improve the usefulness of its My Health Record, a flurry of announcements has celebrated the signing of agreements with pathology laboratories, pharmacy groups and diagnostic imaging practices for the sharing of clinical records.

Following recent criticism of the incomplete information contained within My Health Record and the impact on its clinical value, the ADHA’s efforts to populate the national repository of Australians’ health information with clinically relevant documents have kicked into gear.
But the uploading of people’s most private and consequential personal information onto a Federal Government server is causing concern for the lack of a true opt-out function and little communication with the public.
-----

Most Australians concerned about digital privacy: study

A majority of Australians surveyed about digital rights, the need for governance and the responsibilities of social media platforms have indicated that they are concerned about their digital privacy.
The survey, carried out by the Digital Rights and Governance Project at the University of Sydney, found that of 1600 survey subjects 67% were taking steps to protect their privacy online. But only 38% felt they were in control.
The study found that about 80% wanted to know what information of theirs was being accessed, by whom, and how to report and correct inaccuracies.
-----

More pathology labs and pharmacies in Australia connecting to My Health Record

By: Priyankar Bhunia
29 Nov 2017
Primary Health Care, Australian Clinical Labs, and 7 other software vendors and labs signed agreements with the Australian Digital Health Agency. Chemist Warehouse and Corum have also announced their upcoming connection to My Health Record system in 2018. 
Primary Health Care, Australian Clinical Labs, and seven other pathology software vendors and labs have signed agreements with the Australian Digital Health Agency (the Agency) to share reports with their patients via My Health Record.
This announcement made on November 27, follows Sonic Healthcare’s agreement to connect with My Health Record in June. The Agency made a private sector market offer to support other pathology software vendors. This offer included labs managing their own software to update and connect with My Health Record.
-----

40 agents of digital change

Community, hospital, and academic pharmacists have formed a Pharmacists Digital Health Leaders Network to enhance use of My Health Record by pharmacists and pharmacies

The 40 network members will support local pharmacists in their area to engage with and use My Health Records through digital health workshops and education events.
Pharmaceutical Society of Australia National President Dr Shane Jackson says that the PSA, the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia handpicked the network members as positive agents of change.
-----

How good is your webside manner?

Preserving the doctor-patient relationship via video link
28th November 2017
Doctors in the US are being called on to develop new communication skills to treat patients via video link.
More than 15 million Americans received remote medical care in 2015, and the  American Telemedicine Association predicts this will grow to more than 158 million by 2020.
The US has a serious shortage of doctors, and this shortfall is predicted to reach 90,000 by 2020.
-----

With data breaches, Australia needs zero tolerance

  • Tom Uren
  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM November 30, 2017
From early next year, Australian companies will be obliged to tell you if personal information entrusted to them has been stolen by hackers.
But the notifiable data breaches scheme of the Privacy Act does not go far enough — companies and organisations are obliged to notify only breaches they consider very serious, too many organisations are exempt and the penalties are too low
Every month there is a new announcement that a large trove of personal data has been stolen or lost. This year we have learned of data breaches from Equifax, a US credit reporting agency; the US Securities and Exchange Commission; professional services firm Deloitte; Hyatt Hotels; and online comment service Disqus. We’ve also learned that data on all Yahoo accounts was stolen back in 2013.
-----

Planning to have a baby in 2020? Here's the question you should prepare for

Aisha Dow
Published: November 30 2017 - 12:15AM
The parents of all Victorian babies born in 2020 and 2021 will be asked to hand over their child's health records, as part of an ambitious research project aimed at solving the nation's pressing health problems.
Detailed information about more than 160,000 children is set to be stored in an enormous "data repository" through the Generation Victoria (Gen V) program unveiled on Thursday.
The repository could keep information such as health checks, weight and blood test results as well as school records including whether children arrive at class hungry, if they are left or right-handed, if they can hold a pen and if they are able to read.
-----

Vic babies recruited to fix health woes

More than 100,000 Victorian babies' medical records will be analysed in a world-first research project aimed at solving a “tsunami” of health problems.
Benita Kolovos
Australian Associated Press November 30, 201711:09am
The parents of Victorian babies born in 2020 and 2021 will be asked to hand over their child's medical records as part of a world-first research project aimed at solving a "tsunami" of pressing health problems.
Generation Victoria, or Gen V, is an opt-in program that will track the health of more than 100,000 children in order to supercharge research into health problems including obesity, autism, diabetes and mental illness.
-----

Big data project offers ‘better return’ on health services

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM November 30, 2017
In a world first, medical data from an entire generation of Victorian babies will be pooled to fast-track research into diseases like autism, depression and obesity.
Parents of all children born in the state in 2020 and 2021 will be invited to join the “Gen V” project and help transform Victoria into a “living laboratory”.
The initiative’s architects say it will accumulate medical information at the scale needed to tackle big health issues, allowing researchers to analyse existing data rather than being forced to recruit medical trial participants from scratch.
-----

Better health care for people with chronic conditions

Up to 65,000 Australians will soon be receiving improved care for their ongoing chronic conditions, with the expansion of the Australian Government’s trial of Health Care Homes.
Page last updated: 01 December 2017
12 December 2017
Up to 65,000 Australians will soon be receiving improved care for their ongoing chronic conditions, with the expansion of the Turnbull Government’s trial of Health Care Homes.
An additional 168 general practices and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHS) will offer Health Care Home services from today, building on the 22 clinics already in the trial.
-----

Samsung targets healthcare with Australian summit

  • Chris Griffith
  • The Australian
  • 4:06PM November 29, 2017
Samsung picked Australia to host its first global summit on health today, in an event designed to build a network with locally available health partners.
“We’re thrilled that through the smart summit we’re able to bring so many experts together, encouraging a culture of collaboration that will potentially help the healthcare community in Australia and around the world, “ said Samsung’s Steven Sherry.
At today’s event Samsung announced a clinical trial with St Vincent’s Hospital’s Department of Pain Medicine and the University of New South Wales Art and Design. Patients will take part in a clinical trial of the use of virtual reality (VR) for acute pain management.
-----

Samsung CMO talks clinical credibility as the tech giant announces a partnership with St Vincent’s Sydney

Lynne Minion | 30 Nov 2017
With some of the world’s largest tech companies seeking a foothold in the lucrative global healthcare market, Samsung has announced a partnership with Sydney’s St Vincent’s Hospital designed to solidify its clinician cred.
This latest hospital collaboration will add to the company’s research into virtual reality as a powerful pain management tool, according to Chief Medical Officer and Head of Healthcare and Fitness at Samsung Electronics America Dr David Rhew.
“We've spent a lot of time proving it and that's a perfect example of what we're doing here at St Vincent’s. Once you've got that proof then you've got the opportunity to combine the clinical perspective with the patients’ and create a program that is sustainable and highly effective,” Rhew told Healthcare IT News Australia.
-----

Pelvic mesh problems need register now

  MEDIA RELEASE THURSDAY, 30 NOVEMBER 2017
The Consumers Health Forum welcomes the tighter regulation of pelvic mesh implants and calls for the introduction of a mandatory register to record problems with implants so that action is initiated at the earliest opportunity to reduce risk of harm to other patients.
 The Therapeutic Goods Administration has today announced the de-registering of a number of mesh products whose sole use is the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse by means of transvaginal implantation.  The ban follows a review of the latest international studies and the clinical evidence about products supplied in Australia.
 “The TGA says the overall benefits of using these products for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse do not outweigh the risks that these products pose to patients,” the CEO of the Consumers Health Forum, Leanne Wells, said.
-----

No playing online games at work, advises RACGP

30 November 2017

TECH TALK

We know you wouldn’t. But just in case you’re ever bored and tempted, you shouldn’t try to play a sneaky game of Minesweeper on your work computer.
The same goes for visiting gambling and “objectionable” sites. So says the RACGP in new draft advice to practices when they are drawing up their internet policies for staff.
The guidance is part of the college’s new accreditation standards for general practice. These fifth standards were released in October “to keep pace with the changing medical environment”. 
-----

Depression trial puts smartphones to test

  • Sarah Wiedersehn
  • Australian Associated Press
  • 1:11PM November 29, 2017
Mental health apps will be trialled by thousands of Australian teenagers to test their effectiveness in preventing depression.
The Black Dog Institute will recruit 20,000 Year 7 students to trial the apps as part of a landmark study announced by Federal Minister for Health Greg Hunt on Wednesday,
Lead by Professor Helen Christensen, researchers will examine sensor data collected from smartphones such as GPS, use machine learning analysis and link this to hospital and birth records to develop reliable signals to flag the onset of depressive symptoms in young people.
-----
27 November 2017

New cancer database a key resource for GPs

Posted by Felicity Nelson
Cancer Australia’s new searchable database is giving GPs quick access to population data on cancers.
The National Cancer Control Indicators website, launched this month, brings together information on 17 cancers from trusted sources.
Quick fact cards present up-to-date data on prevention, incidence rates, treatment, and five-year relative survival.
“Cancer is a pretty scary word,” says Dr Liz Marles, the director of the Hornsby GP Unit in Sydney and member of Cancer Australia’s Advisory Council. “Getting a cancer diagnosis is probably one of the biggest personal challenges for people.”
-----

RACGP to govt: Don't use My Health Record data to judge doctor performance

Consultation is under way to work out what additional use the data could have
27th November 2017
The Federal Government has been told not to use patient data in the My Health Record to carry out competency checks on doctors, detect MBS rorts or use it for pay-for-performance.
The system, which has been running since 2012, contains millions of health summaries, along with pathology and imaging results, and MBS and PBS claims.
Consultation is under way to work out what additional use the data could have once it is de-identified.
-----

Big Vic govt agencies fail disaster recovery audit

By Justin Hendry on Nov 29, 2017 11:54AM

Hampered by old systems.

Five key Victorian government service agencies would not be able to recover all their critical systems in the event of disruption due to woeful disaster recovery processes, the state's auditor has found.
Auditor-general Andrew Greeves today revealed the problems were exacerbated by a "relatively high number" of obsolete systems.
The disaster recovery processes of Victoria Police and the Transport, Environment, Health, and Justice departments were assessed using the COBIT 5 model by the audit office.
-----

Govts scope national emergency mobile broadband network

By Justin Hendry on Nov 28, 2017 1:11PM

After all state and territories agree on terms.

Australia's state and territory governments have turned to industry for suggestions on how to create a national mobile broadband network for emergency services.
The work is being spearheaded by the NSW Telco Authority, which has asked telecommunications market participants for information and ideas to influence the direction of the project.
The NSW Telco Authority said it aims to begin trialling service delivery models by the end of January 2018.
-----
9 November 2017

Wild Health: Interoperability improves patient safety

Posted by TMR Staff
Interoperability has few financial imperatives, but it is very important from a patient safety and population health perspective, says Dr Ged Foley, the CEO at IPN Medical Centres.
“Good coordination of chronic care is essential,” he said, speaking with The Medical Republic at the Wild Health Summit last month.
“Having proper interactive care planning where different stakeholders of care can communicate to each other in real time … is becoming increasingly important,” he said.
-----

'What the hell's going on?': How NBN could become Canberra's next big headache

Judith Ireland
Published: December 3 2017 - 12:30AM
When Brigitte House received a letter in July to let her know she could connect her North Fitzroy home to the national broadband network, she was excited. 
"I thought, 'this is great, it's my turn'," House says, adding she imagined she would soon be able to get a faster, more reliable internet connection. 
But four months after she joined up to the network, her faith in the NBN is severely shaken. After several short-term outages (which were quickly fixed by her service provider, Telstra), the Melbourne counsellor was left without internet for 11 days last month due to an NBN outage.  
-----
  • Nov 27 2017 at 4:24 PM

Glitter-to-the-turd NBN applies world class positivity to our broadband woes

For a supposedly apolitical government-owned business, the company rolling out Australia's beleaguered National Broadband Network has certainly developed an ability to spin bad news in a way that would make even the most brass-necked government minister blush.
On Monday NBN introduced Australia to yet another new phrase to add to the broadband list. Alongside fibre to the node, fibre to the premise and fibre to the kerb, we can now add 'glitter to the turd.'
In the morning journalists had received advanced warning that NBN's chief executive Bill Morrow was poised to make a "major announcement regarding customer experience improvements," at a lunchtime press conference.
-----

NBN Co freezes new HFC orders

By Ry Crozier on Nov 27, 2017 12:14PM

Delays go-live for parts of network.

NBN Co is putting a temporary freeze on all new HFC orders and delaying go-live for some of the HFC network as it tries to improve the quality of service for all end users.
The company said it would “temporarily pause all new orders" over its HFC access network.
“This pause will be in effect until incremental field work is undertaken to raise the quality of service for end users,” NBN Co said in a statement.
-----
  • Nov 27 2017 at 12:33 PM

NBN halts HFC rollout 'effective immediately' as issues mount

NBN is immediately halting the rollout of super-fast broadband delivered over pay television cables due to mounting issues with service dropouts, forcing Telstra to flag it will need to reassess its full-year guidance.
NBN chief executive Bill Morrow said poor experience with the hybrid fibre-coaxil rollout, which currently provides cable internet and Foxtel, resulted from the lower frequency band NBN was using.
Those customers slated to be connected to the National Broadband Network via HFC technology, but are not yet connected, will face a delay of six-to-nine months before they will be able to get NBN.
-----
November 28 2017 - 12:01AM

Australian scientists capture Milky Way as it eats another galaxy

Liam Mannix
In deep space, it's kill or be killed.
Simulation shows what will happen when the Milky Way and Andromeda collide and come together to merge into an even bigger galaxy. Courtesy ICRAR-UWA.
Large galaxies like our own need to continually eat smaller galaxies to get fuel for making new stars. Otherwise, they run out of fuel and die. It's the circle of life – in space.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Explanatory Memorandum For Mr Hunt's Rules - A Small Step!

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by Authority of the Minister for Health
My Health Records Act 2012
My Health Records (National Application) Rules 2017
The My Health Records Act 2012 (the Act) enabled the establishment of the My Health Record system (formerly referred to as the personally controlled electronic health record or PCEHR system).  The My Health Record system allows people and their healthcare providers to access their key health information online where and when they need it.  A My Health Record is an electronic summary of a person’s health records. 
The My Health Record system currently operates on an opt-in basis which means that a person needs to register in order to get a My Health Record.
The My Health Records (National Application) Rules 2017 (the National Opt-out Rules) provide that an opt-out model will be implemented so that people no longer need to register; instead a My Health Record will be created for every eligible person unless they choose not to have one (i.e. opt-out).
Background
Due to the low numbers of people choosing to register for a My Health Record, the Act was amended in 2015 to allow for an opt-out model of participation to be implemented. Specifically, Schedule 1 to the Act allows the Minister to make rules to undertake trials of an opt-out model, and to implement opt-out nationally.
Participation trials (including opt-out arrangements) were undertaken in 2016 to inform future strategies for increasing uptake and meaningful use of the My Health Record system.  An evaluation of the trials showed a high level of support by healthcare providers and individuals for the automatic creation of My Health Records, and found that individuals felt the benefits far outweighed risks to privacy, confidentiality and security.
In May 2017 the Government announced that the My Health Record will transition to national opt-out participation arrangements during 2018.
National Opt-out Rules
The National Opt-out Rules are made under subclause 2(1), and subparagraphs 5(2)(c)(i) and 13(2)(c)(i), of Schedule 1 to the Act.
The purpose of the National Opt-out Rules is to apply the opt-out model, as set out in Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Act, nationally.  The National Opt-out Rules specify:
·         the class of people who will have a My Health Record created unless they opt-out;
·         when a person will need to elect if they want to opt-out (i.e. do not want a My Health Record created); and
·         when a person who has not opted out can elect not to have health information which is held by the Chief Executive Medicare disclosed to the System Operator (i.e. included in their My Health Record).
The National Opt-out Rules do not change the participation arrangements of other entities such as healthcare provider organisations.  These entities must still register if they want to participate in the My Health Record system.
Detail of the National Opt-out Rules is set out in the Attachment.
Subsection 109(2) of the Act, together with regulation 5.1.1 of the My Health Records Regulation 2012, provides that before making My Health Records Rules, the Minister must consult with Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) and the System Operator (i.e. the Australian Digital Health Agency).  Consultation occurred in July and August 2017 and the System Operator and AHMAC supported the making of the proposed National Opt-out Rules.
Subclause 2(3) of Schedule 1 to the Act further provides that before making the National Opt‑out Rules, the Minister must consult the Council of Australian Governments Health Council (CHC).  CHC noted the making of the National Opt-out Rules in December 2017.
Public consultation on the concept of an opt-out My Health Record system has been undertaken:
·         during July to September 2014 following the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record Review, as reported in the Report to the Commonwealth Department of Health on the public consultation into the implementation of the recommendations of the Review of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record; and
·         in May and June 2015 upon the release of the Electronic Health Records and Healthcare Identifiers: Legislation Discussion Paper.
Consumers support the concept of an opt-out model for the My Health Record system.
The National Opt-out Rules, with the exception of Part 3, commence on the day after registration on the Federal Register of Legislation.  Part 3 will commence on a day to be specified by the Minister.
Regulation Impact Statements were prepared for the Health Legislation Amendment (eHealth) Bill 2015, which established the ability to implement opt-out nationally (published at ris.pmc.gov.au/2015/07/21/proposed-changes-personally-controlled-electronic-health-record-system), and as part of the Government decision to transition the My Health Record system to an opt-out system (published at ris.pmc.gov.au/2017/06/01/changes-my-health-record-system.
The National Opt-out Rules are a legislative instrument and are subject to the Legislation Act 2003.



ATTACHMENT

PART 1—PRELIMINARY
1          Name of Rules
Rule 1 provides that the title of the Rules is the My Health Records (National Application) Rules 2017.  For the purposes of this document, the Rules are referred to as the National Opt‑out Rules.
2          Commencement
Rule 2 provides for the commencement of the National Opt-out Rules.
With the exception of Part 3, which provides for the period in which people can choose to opt-out, the National Opt-out Rules take effect on the day after the Rules are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.  Of particular importance is the commencement of Part 2 which provides authority for the System Operator to collect information about people who are not registered in the My Health Record system as part of preparation for the implementation of opt-out.
Part 3 will take effect on a day that specified by the Minister in a notifiable instrument or if a day is not specified, 9 months after the Rules are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.  This approach provides the flexibility necessary as the exact timing for implementing opt-out is dependent on technological, communication and operational activities that need to be developed, planned and undertaken in parallel.  It also provides certainty that Part 3 will take effect within a 9 month window.  It is likely that the day specified for Part 3 to take effect will be in the first half of 2018.  The opt-out period referred to in Rule 6 will begin upon the commencement of Part 3 and ends three months later.

3          Authority
Rule 3 identifies that the legal authority for making the National Opt-out Rules is provided by the My Health Records Act 2012.
4          Definitions
Rule 4 provides definitions of several terms used in the National Opt-out Rules.  Of particular importance is the term opt-out model which is defined by Part 2 of the Rules.  Other terms used in the Rules, such as healthcare recipient, are defined by the Act.
PART 2APPLYING OPT-OUT MODEL TO ALL HEALTHCARE RECIPIENTS
5          Opt-out model applies to all healthcare recipients in Australia
Rule 5 applies the opt-out model to all individuals in Australia.  This means that Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Act will begin operating and, in some cases replace existing provisions of the Act, on the day after the Rules are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.  A person cannot be registered unless they have been given an opportunity to opt out or have applied directly to register. 
The Rules do not apply the opt-out model ‘afresh’ to individuals who have already been subject to opt-out arrangements.  This means it does not apply to:
·         people who were in the opt-out trial areas and did not opt-out, and who have since cancelled their My Health Record; or
·         people who were in the opt-out out trial areas and chose to opt-out.
The Rules do apply to people who previously applied for a My Health Record and have since cancelled their My Health Record.  However, when deciding to register individuals as part of these opt-out arrangements, the System Operator will take cancelled My Health Records into account and decide not to register these people.
Rule 5 triggers the authority for the System Operator to collect information about people who are not registered in the My Health Record system as part of preparation for the implementation of opt-out (item 1 of subclause 8(1) of Schedule 1 to the Act provides this authority).

6          When healthcare recipients may elect not to be registered
Rule 6 provides the arrangements by which a person can opt‑out.  Rule 6 will commence on a date to be specified by the Minister (this date will not be before March 2018).  If the Minister does not specify a date, Rule 6 will commence 9 months after the National Opt-out Rules are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.
If a person already has an Individual Healthcare Identifier (IHI) [1] they will be provided the opportunity to opt-out during the opt-out period.  People who do not have an IHI at the commencement of the opt-out period will be provided the opportunity to opt-out prior to being assigned an IHI. 
A person who is enrolled in Medicare[2] or has a Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) file number is automatically assigned an IHI.  People who are not enrolled in Medicare or DVA but receive healthcare in Australia, such as international tourists, or people who want a pseudonymous IHI, can apply directly to the Healthcare Identifiers Service for an IHI.
National roll-out (subrules 6(2) and (3) refer)
Everyone who already has an IHI will be given the opportunity to opt‑out during an opt-out period, and anyone who does not opt‑out will have a My Health Record created for them.[3]
Subrule 6(2) provides that the class of people specified in paragraph 6(3)(a) – those who have an IHI immediately before this Part commences (i.e. the date to be specified by the Minister) – must give their opt-out notice during the period specified in paragraph 6(3)(b) – the period commencing on the day this Part commences (i.e. the date to be specified by the Minister) and ending three months later (referred to as the opt-out period).
People who are part of the national roll-out will have three months in which to opt-out.  This is considered a reasonable amount of time for people to receive information about the creation of My Health Records and take any action necessary.
If a person has been given the opportunity to opt-out, and they don’t want to wait until the end of the opt-out period to get a My Health Record, they may choose to register.  A My Health Record will be created for them immediately.
Ongoing (subrules 6(4) and (5) refer)
Anyone who gets an IHI after the beginning of the national roll-out will be given the opportunity to opt‑out when they apply to enrol in Medicare or get an IHI, and anyone who does not opt‑out will have a My Health Record created for them.[4]
Subrule 6(4) provides that the class of people specified in paragraph 6(5)(a) – those who do not have an IHI immediately before this Part commences (i.e. the date to be specified by the Minister) – must give their opt-out notice upon the event specified in paragraph 6(5)(b) – when they apply for something that results in them being assigned an IHI.  In practice, a person is assigned an IHI when they apply to enrol in Medicare[5] or create an IHI[6].
Unlike national roll-out, the ongoing process does not provide individuals three months in which to opt-out; instead it provides a single point in time.  This is because the ongoing process involves an individual taking an action to interact with a relevant Government service (i.e. enrolling in Medicare to requesting an IHI), and this interaction can be leveraged to ensure the person is directly informed about the My Health Record system and the need to opt-out during that interaction if they don’t want a My Health Record created. 
If an individual has parental or legal authority for another person (such as if they are a parent or guardian), or is found otherwise appropriate to act on behalf of another person, the individual may opt-out that other person.  This capability will be available as part of the national roll-out and the ongoing process.  Individuals aged 14 years and older will be able to opt themselves out.  Individuals younger than 14 years will only be able to opt themselves out if they are able to provide evidence of their capacity to manage their My Health Record.
If a person does not opt-out at the time or during the period specified, the person can still cancel or suspend their registration at any time after their My Health Record is created (under subsection 51(1) of the Act).  Conversely, if a person opts out, they may subsequently register for a My Health Record at any time (under clause 6 of Schedule 1 to the Act).
PART 4—HANDLING HEALTH INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF A HEALTHCARE RECIPIENT’S MY HEALTH RECORD
7          When healthcare recipients may elect not to have certain health information disclosed to System Operator
The Chief Executive Medicare holds the following health information (referred to as Medicare information) about individuals which may, at his or her discretion, be provided to the My Health Record System Operator to include in an individual’s My Health Record (clause 12 of Schedule 1 to the Act):
·         Medicare Benefits Schedule claims information;
·         Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims information;
·         information about organ and/or tissue donation decisions recorded by the Australian Organ Donor Register; and
·         information about immunisations recorded by the Australian Immunisation Register.
People are entitled to choose not to include Medicare information in their My Health Record (clause 13 of Schedule 1 to the Act refers).
In order to choose not to include Medicare information in their My Health Record, a person must give notice to the System Operator at a particular time and in a particular manner.
Rule 7 provides the arrangements by which a person can choose not to include their Medicare information in their My Health Record, whether they are registered because they did not opt‑out, or because they applied to register.  Rule 7 will commence on the day after the National Opt-out Rules are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.
The manner for choosing not to include Medicare information will be offered in one of two ways, depending on how a person has been registered for a My Health Record.
People who apply to register (subrules 7(2) and (3) refer)
Under an opt-out model, people can still choose to register at any time (clause 6 of Schedule 1 to the Act).  This ensures that people who previously had a My Health Record and cancelled it, or who have opted out, can subsequently change their mind and get a My Health Record.
When a person applies to register[7], they will be given the opportunity to choose not to include their Medicare information in their My Health Record.
Subrule 7(2) provides that the class of people specified in paragraph 7(3)(a) – people who, from the day after the National Opt-out Rules have been registered on the Federal Register of Legislation, have been registered – must give notice not to include their Medicare information upon the event specified in paragraph 7(3)(b) – when they apply to register for a My Health Record.
People who are registered because they didn’t opt-out (subrules 7(4) and (5) refer)
When a person does not opt-out and a My Health Record is created for them, they will be able to choose whether to include Medicare information in their My Health Record.
Subrule 7(4) provides that the class of people specified in paragraph 7(5)(a) – people who, from when Part 3 commences (i.e. the date to be specified by the Minister), have been registered because they didn’t opt-out – must give notice not to include their Medicare information within the period specified in paragraph 7(3)(b) – from when they are registered until their My Health Record is first accessed.
It is important to understand that a person’s Medicare information will, by default, automatically be included in the person’s My Health Record unless the person has given notice not to include it.  The transfer process by which Medicare information will be included in a My Health Record is triggered the first time someone accesses a My Health Record – either the person or their healthcare provider.
·         If the person is the first to access their My Health Record they will, before the inclusion of any Medicare information, be guided through the various settings associated with the privacy of their My Health Record.  This will be the opportunity to notify if they do not want their Medicare information included.
·         If the person’s healthcare provider organisation is the first to access a person’s My Health Record, the Medicare information will be included in the My Health Record.  This is because the transfer process has been triggered and no notice has been provided by the person not to include their Medicare information.
A person can change their mind at any time about whether or not to include Medicare information in their My Health Record.  It is important to understand that if a person did not initially give notice not to include their Medicare information, and it has been included in their My Health Record, a subsequent decision not to include this information will only affect new information and will not affect the information already in their My Health Record.  The person may choose to remove any Medicare information from their My Health Record.
Regardless of how people are registered for a My Health Record, if an individual has parental or legal authority for another person (such as if they are a parent or guardian), the individual may choose not to include that other person’s Medicare information in that other person’s My Health Record.



Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
My Health Records (National Application) Rules 2017
This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
The Legislative Instrument is made under subclause 2(1), and subparagraphs 5(2)(c)(i) and 13(2)(c)(i), of Schedule 1 to the My Health Records Act 2012 (the Act).
The purpose of the My Health Records (National Application) Rules 2017 (the National Opt‑out Rules) is to apply the opt-out model, as set out in Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Act, to individuals nationally.  This means that the My Health Record System Operator will create a My Health Record for all individuals unless they choose not to have one.
The National Opt-out Rules specify:
·         the class of people who will have a My Health Record created unless they opt-out – in this case, everyone who has a healthcare identifier;
·         when a person will need to elect if they want to opt-out (i.e. do not want a My Health Record created); and
·         when a person who has not opted out can elect not to have health information which is held by the Chief Executive Medicare disclosed to the System Operator (i.e. included in their My Health Record).
The National Opt-out Rules do not change the participation arrangements of other entities such as healthcare provider organisations.  These entities must still register if they want to participate in the My Health Record system.
Human rights implications
The Legislative Instrument engages the following human rights and freedoms:
Right to health
Article 12(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights provides for the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
The My Health Record system promotes the right to health by facilitating and improving the sharing of health information between treating healthcare providers, leading to quicker and safer treatment decisions and reducing repetition of information for patients and duplication of tests.  Individuals are provided ready access to their own information, empowering them to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
The current opt-in participation arrangements have not effectively encouraged use of My Health Records by individuals and their healthcare providers, and are creating a barrier to achieving the full benefits of the system for individuals. 
Participation trials (including opt-out arrangements) were undertaken in 2016 to inform future strategies for increasing uptake and meaningful use of the My Health Record system.  An evaluation of the trials showed a high level of support by healthcare providers and individuals for the automatic creation of My Health Records, and found that individuals felt the benefits far outweighed the possibility of risks to privacy, confidentiality and security.  As a result, the Government decided to implement the My Health Record system as an opt-out system for individuals.

The Legislative Instrument enables opt-out participation arrangements for every eligible person across Australia.  Increased registration, with the accompanying ability for treating healthcare providers to appropriately share health information for treatment purposes, will help improve the physical and mental health of registered individuals.  This will increase uptake and meaningful use of the My Health Record system with the aim of achieving a greater standard of physical and mental health for all Australians. 
Protection of privacy and reputation
Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights prohibits unlawful or arbitrary interference with a person’s privacy and unlawful attacks on a person’s reputation.  This right is also reflected in Article 22 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Article 16 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The right to privacy encompasses respect for informational privacy. including the right to respect the storing, use and sharing of private information and the right to control the dissemination of private information.  The Legislative Instrument engages the right to privacy by prescribing the class of people to participate in an opt-out model of the My Health Record system, unless they opt-out.
The Legislative Instrument and the Act together counterbalance any limitation of the right to privacy by providing an opportunity for every individual (or their representative) across Australia to opt-out of registration and to ensure that a My Health Record is not created for them.  Individuals who opt-out may later apply for registration, should they change their mind.  Alternatively, individuals who do not opt-out and are registered are able to take advantage of a wide range of privacy protections as outlined below.
As part of the roll-out of opt-out participation arrangements, the Legislative Instrument allows a reasonable period of time (three months) for individuals to consider the benefits of the My Health Record system and their own preferences regarding their privacy and healthcare before making an informed decision as to whether they would like to opt-out of registration and having a My Health Record created.  In future, as new individuals become eligible, the opportunity to opt-out will be made available as part of the process for enrolling in Medicare, and individuals would be able to learn about the My Health Record system and decide whether they would like to opt-out in advance of enrolling in Medicare.  
Under the Act, individuals who are registered may limit and restrict access to their My Health Record with control settings and may cancel or suspend their registration, should they so wish, as described below.
Individuals need to be able to make informed decisions about the My Health Record system.  Individuals will be made aware of the national opt-out arrangements, how their personal information will be handled, and how to opt-out or adjust privacy control settings, so they can make an informed decision.  Comprehensive information and communication activities are being planned to ensure all affected individuals, including parents, guardians and carers, are aware of the opt-out arrangements, what they need to do to participate, how to adjust privacy controls associated with their My Health Record, or opt-out if they choose.  
The Legislative Instrument also ensures that individuals who do not opt-out of registration have the opportunity to elect not to have any of their health information held by the Chief Executive Medicare made available to the System Operator for inclusion in their My Health Record.  Individuals who initially elect not to have their Medicare health information included in their My Health Record may later have such information included, should they change their mind.
Strong privacy safeguards are in place.  People who are registered under opt-out arrangements will retain the same privacy protections as those previously registered under opt-in arrangements.  These protections include the ability to do the following, including for children and persons with disabilities:
·         set access controls restricting access to their My Health Record entirely or restricting access to certain information in their My Health Record;
·         request that their healthcare provider not upload certain information or documents to their My Health Record, in which case the healthcare provider will be required not to upload that information or those documents;
·         request that their Medicare data not be included in their My Health Record, in which case the Chief Executive Medicare will be required to not make the data available to the System Operator;
·         monitor activity in relation to their My Health Record using the audit log or via electronic messages alerting them that someone has accessed their My Health Record;
·         effectively remove documents from their My Health Record;
·         make a complaint if they consider there has been a breach of privacy; and
·         cancel their registration (that is, cancel their My Health Record).
Increased use of the system under opt-out arrangements is a privacy-positive outcome as it will help reduce the use of paper records, which pose significant privacy risks.  For example, where a patient is receiving treatment in a hospital’s emergency department for a chronic illness, the hospital may request from the patient’s regular doctor information about the patient’s clinical history which is likely to be faxed to the hospital.  The fax might remain unattended on the fax machine for an extended period of time before being placed into the patient’s file, or the information may be sent to the wrong fax number.  Either of these things could lead to an interference with the patient’s privacy should a third party read the unattended fax or incorrectly receive the fax.  In contrast, under the My Health Record system, the patient’s Shared Health Summary would be securely available only to those people authorised to see it.  
There are other similar scenarios where an increase in the level of use of the My Health Record system, as will occur under opt-out arrangements, is likely to lead to a reduction in privacy breaches associated with paper-based records.
Conclusion
The Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights because it advances the right to health.  Any limitation of the right to privacy is proportionate, necessary and reasonable to achieving improved healthcare for Australians.  Increased use of the My Health Record system, which will occur as a result of opt-out arrangements, will result in a number of privacy positives compared to use of paper-based records.
The Hon Greg Hunt MP
Minister for Health


[1] Healthcare identifiers have been used since June 2010 and were established by the Healthcare Identifiers Act 2010.  Healthcare identifiers are used for consistently identifying individuals and healthcare providers to, among other things, ensure patients are properly matched with their health records, and support the communication of health information between healthcare providers.  The Chief Executive Medicare is currently responsible for operating the Healthcare Identifiers Service.
[2] In general, any person who resides in Australia is eligible to enrol in Medicare if they hold an Australian or New Zealand citizenship, have been issued with a permanent visa or have applied for a permanent visa.  For detailed Medicare eligibility criteria, go to the Department of Human Services website.
[3] There are some exceptions.  Despite having an IHI, not everyone will be included in this process – that is, they will not be given the opportunity to opt-out and will not be registered.  For example, the System Operator will not register any person who previously had a My Health Record and cancelled it, who were part of the opt-out trials and opted out, who has a pseudonymous IHI, or whose registration may compromise the security or integrity of the system.
[4] The System Operator will not register any person whose registration may compromise the security or integrity of the system.
[5] The Medicare enrolment application form is available on the Department of Human Services website.  The form must be completed and either submitted in person at a Medicare service centre or posted to the Department of Human Services.
[6] The Healthcare Identifiers Service Application to create or update an Individual Healthcare identifier form is available on the Department of Human Services website.  The form must be completed and either submitted in person at a Medicare service centre or posted to the Department of Human Services.
[7] A person can apply to register online at the My Health Record website, in person at a Medicare service centre, by phone on 1800 723 471, or in writing by completing the Application to register for a My Health Record form and sending it to the My Health Record System Operator. 

-----
Comments are welcome!

David