Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, September 20, 2018

It's Good To See The RACGP Has Noticed The Issue Dr Walker Raised Here A Week Or So Back.

This appeared from the RACGP late last week.

GP-run school clinic to close due to teens’ data privacy fears

Doug Hendrie 13/09/2018 3:41:32 PM
A ground-breaking Tasmanian school health clinic will close due to fears that sensitive data uploaded to My Health Record may be seen by parents.
GPs are concerned young people will not divulge sensitive information due to fear it could be seen in My Health Record.
GP Dr Robert Walker has run a student health clinic at Rosny High School, which has around 1000 students, in Hobart for 10 years. It is one of only two GP-run school health clinics in Tasmania.

But he will close the clinic on 15 November, the day all Australians who have not opted out of My Health Record will have a record made for them.

‘About 15% of our young patients have a [My Health Record], presumably enrolled by their parents and almost all without their knowledge,’ he wrote in a blog post.

‘These students are really distressed by having a [My Health Record] and now worry about their confidentiality.

‘If we do not tick a box on our path referrals to avoid results going onto their [My Health Record], parents and others can see the results of [STI] and HIV screens. If a pharmacist slips up and fails to block a dispensing activity, scripts for contraceptives and medications for [STIs] are also visible.’

Dr Walker will this week make a formal submission to the ongoing Senate committee inquiry into My Health Record, calling for urgent change.

In his submission, he will note that, ‘Simple tick-box errors on requests for pathology or imaging tests, poorly edited Shared Health Summaries prepared by other providers with unproven or irrelevant diagnoses or errors with pharmacy dispensing notifications may cause unintended or incorrect uploads of data into a student’s [My Health Record] – which other parties can view.’

‘As GPs, we insist that [My Health Record] be restructured and alternatives considered for teenagers,’ he will write to the inquiry, calling for a stop to the program for young people between 13 and 19.

Dr Walker told newsGP he is in a bind, as he and other GPs will be in trouble if they continued – and students will be in trouble if they did not.

‘What we don’t want is to have students fearing going to us or other doctors for service. When they see a doctor sitting there with a computer, they’ll be thinking, “Where is this data going?”’ he said.

‘[At present], we tell kids that whatever they tell us, it won’t get back to mum, dad, the police or a boyfriend. And they say, “Whew, that’s great”.

‘Adolescents are much more sensitive to potential damage to their privacy than adults. If you’re 17 and applying for a job, you don’t want your anxiety known to people.’

Dr Walker estimates he and his colleagues from nearby Lindisfarne Clinic see around 50 students a week, with consultations split evenly between mental health, sexual health and injury.

He said there are many ways sensitive information – the results of an STI test, a prescription for contraception, or notes on a mental health condition – could be uploaded to a mature minor’s My Health Record and seen by parents or guardians.

‘You might prescribe a contraceptive and the teenager’s older sister might go get it. The pharmacist wouldn’t realise it was a mature minor and would upload a Shared Health Summary, and the data’s up there,’ he said.

Dr Walker gave the example of a former patient who wanted a pregnancy test.

‘In great fear, she said, “If my father finds out about this, he will beat me”. So that’s the fear we have,’ he said. ‘Unless we can guarantee confidentiality – and I can’t, after 15 November – why do it?’

‘The last thing we want to have happen is have a kid suffer injury. They might tell us about same-sex attraction, about an experience with an older boy, they might want an HIV screen. Let’s say that pings up on their record and they’ve got a highly religious family – they might end up homeless.’

Dr Walker said that to continue his twice-weekly bulk-billed drop-in clinic, he and his colleagues would have to spend an ‘inordinate’ amount of time making sure students understood the potential risks of having data uploaded to My Health Record.

‘The extra work to minimise harm will make our clinics unworkable. Just telling teenagers to alter the settings on their [My Health Record] is not enough,’ he will write in his submission.

‘[T]eenagers may avoid consulting their doctors or psychologists via Medicare. This loss of faith will be a disaster and will destroy the long accepted recognition by young people that doctors ensure confidentiality.’

The news comes after Dr Nathan Pinskier, Chair of the RACGP Expert Committee – eHealth, this week told the Senate committee inquiry that the issue of parents of mature minors seeing sensitive data represents a growing concern.

Dr Pinskier called for a halt to any automatic uploading of data for young people between 14 and 18 unless they directly opened their own My Health Record. He also called for access to be denied automatically to authorised representatives once a minor turns 14, without the need for them to take control of their own record.

Dr Pinskier told newsGP the issue had been raised repeatedly by worried GPs at My Health Record education sessions run by the RACGP.

At present, a teenager’s authorised representative has default access to their My Health Record until they turn 18, unless they take control earlier.

Dr Pinskier said it is unrealistic to expect teenagers to be able to verify their identity and gain access to the documents – such as evidence of address, bank account details and Medicare details – required to take control of their own record.

While Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) information is not visible in a teenager’s My Health Record, the RACGP will express its concern that pathology reports, medicine information and other summary documents may disclose sensitive health information the teen may not wish to share.
Here is the link:
There is more coverage here:
What we now have to do is see if these concerns actually lead to change – and how effective it will be.
Time will tell.
David.

Senate myHR Inquiry Alert: Additional Session 5pm 20 September, 2018

Apparently the Department of Health are to answer further questions.

Here are the details

My Health Record system
PUBLIC HEARING

Thursday 20 September 2018
Committee Room 2S1
Parliament House, Canberra

5.00 pm

Department of Health (Submission 22)
Ms Tania Rishniw, First Assistant Secretary

Australian Digital Health Agency (Submission 31)
Mr Tim Kelsey, Chief Executive Officer
Ms Bettina McMahon, Chief Operating Officer
Mr Ronan O'Connor, Executive General Manager, Core Services Systems Operations
Clinical Professor Meredith Makeham, Chief Medical Adviser

6.00 pm Adjournment

-----

Here is the link to watch:

https://www.aph.gov.au/Watch_Read_Listen

David.

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

The Arguments For Staying In The myHR Pretty Flimsy I Believe. Let’s Us Explore A Few Facts.

There is a lot of exaggeration in the arguments we hear from the increasingly desperate proponents of the myHR.
The first argument is that myHR will allow us to get rid of the dreaded fax machine (which apparently contributed to the death of a patient a while ago – which is only partly true given the failure of physicians to follow up tests they ordered.) and what  fabulous boon to all that would be.
Sadly, with extremely rare exceptions, the fax machine has worked very well and has got thousands of results accurately and cheaply into the hands of the right doctor when needed – including specialists – who right now do not have the alternative is place, as what they have works well 99.9% of the time. The clinical community does not see the myHR as useful but over time they may just see secure message relayed reports as useful. Time will tell but saying messages good, faxes totally bad ignores the reality for now or in the foreseeable future. The simple truth is that the fax will die out when there is a better, cheaper and easier to use substitute that has widespread connectivity and interoperability.  Over to you technology innovators and implementers!
The second argument is that the myHR is a useful record in an emergency. If someone looked it up in an emergent situation and it actually had current easily accessible information that just might be true. With so many GP not wanting to have a bar of the myHR most won’t and presently with so many ‘zombie accounts’ (about 4 million of the 6 million records) even with opt-out it will take years – if ever.
There are a lot of simpler and easy alternatives like a short summary printed out by your GP and carried in the wallet etc. Remember the cost in GP time to have myHR records updated at reasonable frequency will cost over a $1billion a year. The thing would want to make a huge proven difference to be worth anywhere near that amount!  An honest cost / benefit analysis of the whole program is well overdue.
Third and linked are all the claims for savings with better medication information, test results and so on. There is just no on the ground evidence for this is the community environment that I know of - and I have looked. Sure this works to a degree in highly automated hospitals but using the myHR as an information source – slow, incomplete  and clumsy as it is - will not get similar results and has not been shown to be able to. It is all hope against experience.
Fourth the claim for endorsement of all the peak Digital Health entities is weakened by their close, often financial relationships with the ADHA, and for some of them an increasing recognition there are still many questions to be resolved with opt-out. As for the claim of supporting innovation most of the Digital Health industry thinks the opposite is true! (Note: I do understand the worry many of these peak entities have regarding ongoing funding etc. from Government if the myHR falls over. The point is that the myHR is a fundamental enemy of the sort of innovation that is actually needed - we are letting the awful be the enemy of the worthwhile and useful!)
When you mix this with all the risks with various populations – adolescents, the digitally deprived, the mentally ill and HIV carriers etc. this is a national experiment which needs to be rethought and done properly – not done at the behest of some data hungry health bureaucrats.
This is all not as simple as the ADHA propagandists would have you believe.
David.

The Hansard Transcript For The myHR Senate Inquiry Has Been Published.

Here is the link:

http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/commsen/c11da67a-4c01-42c5-9a03-529d794e8735/toc_pdf/Community%20Affairs%20References%20Committee_2018_09_17_6586.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22committees/commsen/c11da67a-4c01-42c5-9a03-529d794e8735/0000%22

David.

Link To Senate myHR Inquiry Session Monday Afternoon 17 Sep 2018

Here you go:

http://parlview.aph.gov.au/mediaPlayer.php?videoID=416692&operation_mode=parlview

David

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Commentators and Journalists Weigh In On The MyHR Debate And Related Matters. Lots Of Interesting Perspectives - 9.

Note: I have excluded any commentary taking significant  funding from the Agency or the Department of Health on all this to avoid what amounts to paid propaganda. (e.g. CHF, RACGP, AMA, National Rural Health Alliance etc. where they were simply putting the ADHA line – viz. that the myHR is a wonderfully useful clinical development that will save huge numbers of lives at no risk to anyone – which is plainly untrue) (This signifies probable ADHA Propaganda)
-----

Submission to the Senate inquiry on My Health Record

Posted on September 11, 2018 by Grahame Grieve
This is the submission I made to the Australian Senate with regard to its inquiry into the My Health Record. 
Executive Summary
My remarks relate to the following parts of the terms of reference:
  a. the expected benefits of the My Health Record system;
  b. how My Health Record compares to alternative systems of digitising health records internationally;
Recommendation:
The Department of Health (DOH) and the Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) work with the community to define an alternative architecture for a federated system for healthcare data exchange. This would allow for the implementation of the National Digital Health Strategy, and stimulate innovation to improve health, and leverage international standards and programs.
-----

GP-run school clinic to close due to teens’ data privacy fears

Doug Hendrie 13/09/2018 3:41:32 PM
A ground-breaking Tasmanian school health clinic will close due to fears that sensitive data uploaded to My Health Record may be seen by parents.
GPs are concerned young people will not divulge sensitive information due to fear it could be seen in My Health Record.
GP Dr Robert Walker has run a student health clinic at Rosny High School, which has around 1000 students, in Hobart for 10 years. It is one of only two GP-run school health clinics in Tasmania.
But he will close the clinic on 15 November, the day all Australians who have not opted out of My Health Record will have a record made for them.
‘About 15% of our young patients have a [My Health Record], presumably enrolled by their parents and almost all without their knowledge,’ he wrote in a blog post.
‘These students are really distressed by having a [My Health Record] and now worry about their confidentiality.
-----
Published Sep 12 2018

My Health Record: think about the status quo before opting out

Featuring

Chris Bain
Professor of Practice in Digital Health  Probable ADHA Propaganda
In 2017, Victorian resident Mettaloka Halwala died after his cancer test results that showed signs of fatal lung toxicity were faxed to the wrong number. The Victorian coroner ruled his death could have been prevented had he not been let down by a systemic failure of healthcare management.
Considering this tragedy, it’s important to think about the status quo when deciding to opt-out of the My Health Records (MHR) system, and the status quo is poor.
As you read this, reams of healthcare data is being sent between health professionals in the mail, via fax, through conversations on the phone or in person, via SMS or MMS, through WhatsApp and similar systems, and in small pockets of secure messaging.
When you think about this, it’s no wonder that health information goes missing. There are numerous examples of paper medical files being found in bins and inadequately disposed of, and examples of medical records found by complete strangers.
-----

CSIRO lays out action plan for Australia’s digital health future

Staff writer | 12 Sep 2018
Consumer distrust in data sharing, poor digital health literacy and system interoperability problems are major challenges to the effectiveness and sustainability of Australia’s healthcare system, according to a new CSIRO report aimed at highlighting solutions.
Released on Wednesday, the Future of Health: Shifting Australia’s focus from illness treatment to health and wellbeing management report is aimed at shaping future investments in the health system to help shift the focus on illness treatment to health and wellbeing management within the next 15 years.
“While there has been a broad social shift, purposefully and inadvertently, to sharing personal information in other sectors, consumer trust can be rapidly eroded if the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of their information is threatened,” the report’s authors stated.
-----

“Not fit for this purpose”: FHIR creator on My Health Record as the Senate inquiry gets underway

Lynne Minion | 13 Sep 2018
A global digital health leader has called for a rethink on the fundamental technology underpinning My Health Record, adding his clout to the submissions to the Senate inquiry into My Health Record.
Creator of the FHIR standard Grahame Grieve, who has provided technical advice to the My Health Record program since its inception, has called for an overhaul of the national health information platform, which he says was built on technology that was state-of-the-art in 2007.
In the decade since, according to Grieve’s submission to the parliamentary inquiry, technology and society have changed through the introduction of smartphones, wearables, cloud computing and high-speed broadband, and with these tech advances have come major developments in data exchange protocols.
-----

Helping patients to help themselves is good for the health economy

MEDIA RELEASE THURSDAY, 13 SEPTEMBER 2018
 Australia’s premier scientific body, the CSIRO has pinpointed empowering consumers as a key to improving Australia’s health, confirming a message the Consumers Health Forum has highlighted for years.
In its Future of Health report, the CSIRO put “empowering consumers” as its number one point in shifting Australia’s focus from illness treatment to health and wellbeing management.
“The report states that consumers are an ‘underutilised resource in the health sector’, which CHF is seeking to turn around by encouraging consumer involvement in direction and design of health care services wherever possible,” the CEO of the Consumers Health Forum, Leanne Wells said.
“As the report says, consumers can be empowered by a greater focus on the prevention of illness, and manage their health by improving health literacy, reducing information asymmetry, expanding telehealth services and developing consumer-focused health solutions.
-----

My Health Record needs to be compared to fax-based reality: AMA

The Australian Medical Association has said privacy experts are comparing My Health Record with a utopian ideal, not a doctor's lived reality.
By Chris Duckett | September 12, 2018 -- 05:57 GMT (15:57 AEST) | Topic: Security
The debate surrounding Australia's My Health Record has seen a forensic privacy and security analysis of the new system, but not one looking at the current ways doctors and health providers communicate, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has said.
Speaking to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee on Tuesday night, AMA South Australia vice president Dr Chris Moy said the current state of affairs for doctors is primitive, and has its own privacy vulnerabilities.
"The most common form of urgent communication is fax -- that's the real world that we live in," Moy said. "This isn't particularly private because I don't know where it ends up, where it is -- and it is absolutely no use [asking me to send a fax] if I am not there after-hours.
"We are living in this faxland.
-----

RACGP warns of parents’ ability to see teenagers’ data on My Health Record

Doug Hendrie 12/09/2018 2:43:39 PM
The RACGP has alerted the Government to growing concerns regarding parents’ access to teenagers’ sensitive health data on My Health Record.
Dr Nathan Pinskier, Chair of the RACGP Expert Committee – eHealth, believes the issue of teenagers’ privacy is shaping up as a major concern among GPs.
At a Senate committee inquiry into My Health Record last night in Canberra, Dr Nathan Pinskier, speaking on behalf of the RACGP, called for a halt to the current policy allowing authorised representatives access to teenage children’s health data.  
Prior to the hearing, Dr Pinskier told newsGP that the issue is shaping up as a major concern among GPs, particularly in terms of sensitive areas such as sexual health.
‘Say a patient is 15 and has a sexually transmitted infection. If a parent sees [that data], it would cause significant consequences,’ he said.
‘How many kids at 14 think, “I can get my documents, take control and de-link my parents?”
‘And if they did that, what would the parents say when they realise they can no longer access their child’s records? It’s fraught with peril.’
-----
12 September 2018

Phelps warns of hidden landmines in MHR legislation

Posted by Julie Lambert
Former AMA president Dr Kerryn Phelps has demanded a full review of the My Health Record legislation to look for more “hidden landmines” after an outcry by doctors over access loopholes.
Dr Phelps has also told a Senate inquiry into the MHR that it should seek a public examination of the business case for the Australian Digital Health Agency to guard against possible future privatisation and monetisation of patients’ data.
“We have to ask what is the real underlying motivation for this massive exercise in data mining. Surely it’s not primarily the patients’ best interests,” she said, addressing the Senate Community Affairs committee by videolink on Tuesday.
The high-profile Sydney GP said she had been alarmed at the access provisions revealed when she read the MHR legislation, despite assurances by the health minister and the ADHA that “policy” was in place to protect patients.
-----

Australia a ‘digitally-divided society’ finds global index

Tenth overall, but 'deep disparities' within
George Nott (CIO) 12 September, 2018 00:01
Australia has been ranked as the tenth most ‘digitally ready’ nation, in a new index by Cisco and Gartner. But the research exposes a significant ‘digital divide’ between the states and territories, with Tasmania and the Northern Territory being left behind.
The Cisco Digital Readiness Index, released today, measured the digital readiness of 118 countries, based on seven metrics.
While Australia scored highly overall, the report revealed “deep disparities across the country” and “widespread unevenness”.
Those in the Australian Capital Territory were given a digital readiness score of 21.14, while Tasmania scoring 9.65 and the Northern Territory scoring just 4.80.
The score is based on metrics including: human capital (total labour force, adult literacy rate, population and years of schooling); basic human needs (life expectancy, mortality rate, sanitation, access to electricity); ease of doing business; and the start-up environment.
-----

AMA pushes for assurances on data protection at My Health Record inquiry

Marnie Banger AAP
September 11, 2018 3:09PM

Topics

AUSTRALIA’S most powerful doctors’ group wants further assurances that data on the federal government’s controversial e-health records system won’t ever be handed to private health insurers.
The Australian Medical Association will on Tuesday make the push at a parliamentary inquiry examining the My Health Record system.
AMA President Tony Bartone says the group is happy with strict restrictions blocking private health insurers from accessing the data, with people’s identities removed.
But he wants the status of the rules to be upgraded so they could only be changed through parliament.
“That would give the parliament the opportunity to see any changes and ensure that the Australian public is protected,” Dr Bartone told ABC Radio on Tuesday.
-----

Protect data from private insurers: AMA

The Australian Medical Association will be among those presenting at an inquiry into My Health Record, pushing for assurances on data protection.
Marnie Banger
Australian Associated Press September 11, 20182:10pm
Australia's most powerful doctors' group wants further assurances that data on the federal government's controversial e-health records system won't ever be handed to private health insurers.
The Australian Medical Association will on Tuesday make the push at a parliamentary inquiry examining the My Health Record system..
AMA President Tony Bartone says the group is happy with strict restrictions blocking private health insurers from accessing the data, with people's identities removed.
-----

Transcript:   AMA President, Dr Tony Bartone, RN, Breakfast with Fran Kelly

11 Sep 2018

Transcript:   AMA President, Dr Tony Bartone, RN, Breakfast with Fran Kelly, Tuesday, 11 September 2018
Subject:   My Health Record

FRAN KELLY:   Well, the Federal Government's My Health system is back in the spotlight with a Senate inquiry into the database holding its first public hearing today. This comes just weeks after Health Minister Greg Hunt announced new privacy measures to restore public trust in the system.
   [Excerpt]
GREG HUNT:   No police or government agency will be able to access any records without a court order. That's the existing policy, but the legislation from 2012 under Labor will be strengthened to do that. Secondly, we will also ensure that if somebody seeks to cancel their record, it will be deleted from the system permanently.
   [End of excerpt]
FRAN KELLY:   Health Minister Greg Hunt speaking last month. But privacy advocates still say that greater protection of personal health information is needed, while private health insurers continue to lobby to get access to the data.
The AMA is appearing at today's public hearing. President of the AMA is Dr Tony Bartone. Dr Tony Bartone, welcome back to Breakfast.
TONY BARTONE:   Good morning, Fran.
-----

My Health Record lets down the patients who could use it the most

Some diseases are judged more worthy than others. People with mental health issues, addiction and obesity know it
 ‘Whether or not we should trust the medical system to advocate for our personal wellbeing is a debate worth having. But it is also beside the point. Many don’t trust it, whether for lack of resources or want of empathy, and that itself is a problem when it’s a matter of public health.’
It seemed like such a good idea: a digital vault for all of our health records accessible by a variety of healthcare providers. But for all of their promise, digital systems like My Health Record risks letting down the very people it could help most unless we acknowledge what makes a disease a disease.
Any database of personal health records has to deal with two fundamental problems. One is a fear that healthcare providers might act less as an advocate for our personal wellbeing, and more as a gate keeper who judges our right to treatment.
-----

Mums hiding from violent exes fear they'll be found via My Health Record

Pilar Mitchell | September 11, 2018

"This places our safety at risk - he has threatened to kill," one terrified mum said.
It takes a hell of a lot of courage for a woman to leave her violent partner - so many women right now are desperately wanting to run out the door with their children - but they often talk themselves out of it due to paralysing fear. 
And now that fear is being escalated with their children’s My Health Records allowing  these dangerous ex-partners access to sensitive information including the family’s new address.
The reason for this because although an individual’s My Health Record is private and can only be accessed by the record owner and medical professionals, when the individual is a minor, records are visible to parents, The Daily Telegraph has revealed.
In a happy home, there is no issue for concern, but in a situation where an abused mother has fled her home, a child’s My Health Record holds sensitive data that could help a violent ex-partner track down his family.
-----

My Health Record: privacy and data access under microscope

Tuesday 11 September 2018 6:36AM (view full episode)
The outcry over privacy protections in the online health database My Health Record has faded over the last month, but privacy advocates are ready to renew their fight against the system, as a Senate inquiry into the database holds its first public hearing today.
As criticism of the plan to add every Australian to the register, unless they opt out, grew louder in July, Health Minister Greg Hunt took steps to strengthen privacy measures.
Those changes haven't satisfied the critics.
Private health insurers are still lobbying hard to get access to the data, although they say they don't want to see any patients' names attached.

Guests

Tony Bartone - Australian Medical Association
-----

My Health Record could be used to track women hiding from violent partners

Sue Dunlevy, National Health Reporter, News Corp Australia Network
September 10, 2018 9:13pm
WOMEN in violent relationships fear their partner will be able to track down their hiding places through their child’s My Health Record, a leaked submission into a senate inquiry claims.
News Corp has learned The Australian Digital Health Agency’s (ADHA) default position is to allow those parents access to their children’s My Health records which could contain information such as residential addresses or the pharmacy or GP used by the parent.
And where there is a dispute between separated parents over who can access the child’s record, the ADHA will suspend both parents’ access to the record until it investigates and decides which parent should have access.
“We work on the instruction of either of the parents who have equivalent status,” the Australian Digital Health Agency told its steering committee on August 20.
-----

My Health data revolution ‘can save lives’

  • 12:00AM September 10, 2018
The heads of Australia’s private health industry have argued that the federal government has lost the narrative on the rollout of My Health Record as they backed the initiative and called for greater use of data to fuel preventive care.
Mark Fitzgibbon, head of health insurer NIB, also rejected suggestions insurers could be accessing data from the digital health record system.
“Forget the idea insurers can use somebody’s individual health profile to disadvantage them — in our world of community rating, enshrined in the legislation and our culture, we charge people the same price irrespective of age and health status,” he said.
The rollout of the e-health initiative lost momentum as privacy concerns dominated headlines, forcing Health Minister Greg Hunt to commit to change the laws protecting consumers and their data. A Senate inquiry is also set to examine the security measures around the e-health records, which Australians have until October 15 to opt out of.
Medibank chief executive Craig Drummond was confident the government would work through the issues, adding that the insurer supported the digital record.
-----

Data fears may spark opt-out choice in WA from My Health Record

Cathy O'Leary
The West Australian
Sunday, 9 September 2018 4:43PM
Cracks are appearing in WA support for the Federal Government’s controversial My Health Record, with a cybersecurity expert calling on people to opt out.
Dr David Glance, from the University of WA, who spoke at a public talk on online safety at a City of Perth event this week, said he had opted out along with many family, friends and colleagues in the security industry.
He said data in the health records was limited but just having prescription details was enough for someone to tell that you were taking antidepressants.
Health Consumers’ Council executive director Pip Brennan said that while she personally opted in two years ago, she felt conflicted.
She advised people who had sensitive medical information such as a mental health diagnosis or drug issues and were unsure to opt out.
-----
Comments welcome!
David.

A Small Example Of What Nonsense Bureaucrats Will Put Up To Justify Doing What They Want.

Over a year ago this was published:

Changes to My Health Record System

Aust Gov
1st June 2017
Regulation Impact Statement - Department of Health
The Government announced changes to its My Health Record system as part of the 2017-18 Budget. The My Health Record system will change to an opt-out model.
As a result of these changes, every Australian will have a My Health Record unless they prefer not to. Transition to opt-out participation will bring forward benefits to patients and medical service providers many years sooner than the current opt-in arrangements.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) assessed the Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) prepared by the Department of Health as best practice.
The RIS estimated the average annual regulatory savings of the proposal to be $3.13 million. The OBPR has agreed to this estimate.
Here is the link:
The benefits claimed are here:
Impact on Government
There will be a short term cost for Government to support an increase to the capacity of the My Health Record system and to undertake public communication campaigns, healthcare provider-readiness activities and training and education to support National Opt Out arrangements.
For a one-off cost of $180.9 million over four years (to the end of FY 2020/21) to implement Opt Out arrangements nationally, benefits will be delivered within the forward estimates period, and much sooner than under a continuation of the existing arrangements. 
The Government would gain significant economic benefits and return on this investment through reductions in the growth of healthcare costs arising from improvements such as:
  • reduced hospital admissions;
  • improved individual care including better management of chronic disease; and
  • a more efficient healthcare system.

Health Benefits
Broader participation and meaningful use of the My Health Record system will put the person at the centre of their healthcare and support sustainability through better availability and use of health information, which has the potential to enhance policy formulation, innovation and allocation of resources thus improving the quality and the safety of healthcare and service delivery costs.

Encouraging increased participation and effective use of the My Health Record system can lead to improved coordination and better integration of the healthcare system, resulting in a reduction in adverse events and in duplication of treatments and tests.
The reductions in time taken in finding information and the performance of unnecessary investigations would result in improved productivity for the health workforce.
Enhancing participation and meaningful use of the My Health Record system will be of particular benefit to individuals with chronic and complex conditions, older Australians, Indigenous Australians, mothers and newborn children, and individuals living in rural and regional areas, as they are more likely to access healthcare from numerous healthcare providers.
In addition, it would mean that individuals and their families will be able to go anywhere in Australia to receive high quality and convenient healthcare, reducing the time and costs associated with undertaking duplicate tests or repeating information.
Increasing the uptake and meaningful use of the My Health Record system would lead to:
·         Improved health outcomes, avoided hospital admissions and saved lives through fewer adverse drug events (more Australians die each year because of medication errors than from road accidents), better coordination of care for people seeing multiple healthcare providers, and better informed treatment decisions ($2.10 billion estimated over ten years);
·         A much more efficient health system. For example, healthcare providers will spend less time searching for information about their patients ($2.81 billion estimated over ten years);
·         Avoided duplication of diagnostic tests - pathology and diagnostic imaging ($2.08 billion estimated over ten years);
·         Putting the person at the centre of their healthcare, so they play a greater role and take greater responsibility for their own health ($1.41 billion estimated over ten years);
·         Enabling innovation and developments in healthcare through secondary uses of health information, enabling unprecedented levels of insight into population health outcomes, which better-inform policy decisions, make resourcing more sustainable, and inspire new clinical developments ($6.19 billion estimated over ten years).

It is anticipated that benefits in health outcomes will be skewed towards vulnerable families as they currently face more challenges in accessing timely and appropriate healthcare and will have more to benefit from increased participation and meaningful use of the My Health Record system. Based on current experience, these people are less likely to participate in the existing opt in model as they are more likely to be challenged by the registration process. Vulnerable population groups may include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, families with a member who has a mental illness, families in which English is a second language, and families with low socio-economic status. These groups are expected to experience more pronounced benefits as the My Health Record system will help reduce the burden carried by these families.
----- End extract from Pages 7 and 8.
The move to opt out was to provide $14.59 Billion over 10 years of which almost half was derived from Secondary Use Initiatives rather than clinical benefit.
This is the  clearest statement yet of what the myHR is actually for. It is not as Mr Shetler said Your Health Record but a Government Record of your health information!
We can only marvel as to how these figures were derived but the Government does not show its working….
Read closely and you will also see the so called beneficiaries are likely those who will not have the means or capacity (internet etc.) to interact and use the myHR. The wrong side of the Digital Divide.
What a fudge.
David.

Are You Amazed By What Mr Kelsey Told Us? - I Sure Am.

Besides the amazing lack of insight of the Liberal Senators regarding the issues being raised by witnesses at the Senate Inquiry Into The myHR yesterday afternoon there were two figures that struck me.

First was the admission that at least 900,000 citizens had opted out - as those in the paper based opt-out channel were yet to be counted and would add some more.

Then Mr Kelsey said that was about 3% of the population who could opt-out - there being that choice for all those that had an Individual Health Identifier - an IHI. He then said there were about 28 million of those.

Given there is only a population of 25 million in Australia, who are the other 3 million? Some are visitors etc. but I bet there are all sorts of duplicates, dead people and so on as well, in what can't be a very accurate IHI database. I wonder is this due to under-resourcing of the areas that maintain the IHI system.

It seems the ADHA really does not even know who it is actually going to 'opt-out' with any certainty and that will be a real ongoing data integrity issue.

What a mess. And the admission of the lack of a Business Case etc. for the whole thing just adds to the sense of ad-hoc-ery!

David.

p.s.

And the quote of the session - Paul Shetler - "The myHealthRecord in not your health record, it is a Government Health Record about you." Not sure many want one of those?

D.