This blog is totally independent, unpaid and has only three major objectives.
The first is to inform readers of news and happenings in the e-Health domain, both here in Australia and world-wide.
The second is to provide commentary on e-Health in Australia and to foster improvement where I can.
The third is to encourage discussion of the matters raised in the blog so hopefully readers can get a balanced view of what is really happening and what successes are being achieved.
Quote Of The Year
Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"
or
H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
Wednesday, May 05, 2021
All The Wrinkles Are Not Quite Out Of ePrescribing Just Yet. Stay Alert For Issues!
Just three months after active ingredient
legislation kicked into action, GPs say hazardous blind spots in the system are
becoming apparent.
Now, no matter what brand name is typed into
the computer end of the prescription software, it will print with only the
generic name.
Although GPs are still able to check a
no-substitutions box when creating the prescription – which will then allow the
brand name to be listed – Sydney GP Dr Ruth Ratner told The
Medical Republic that this was a less-than-ideal workaround.
“The only way to get the brand name back [on
the medication list] for somebody who has been on a drug for a long time is to
delete it, re-write it and tick that box,” she said.
“But
when there are 10 different drugs to do that with, it is exceptionally
onerous.”
Dr
Ratner has further concern that when a drug is deleted and re-added to the
medication list, it could give the false impression that the date it was changed
was the date it was originally prescribed.
When
a patient with an egg allergy presented for a flu vaccination, however, Dr
Ratner found a hole in the system far more serious than wasted time.
After
Dr Ratner wrote a prescription for the egg-free version of the vaccine, the patient
collected it from a pharmacy and returned for immunisation.
Having
forgotten to tick the no-substitutions box, the doctor did not realise the
script printout had requested a generic flu vaccine – which the pharmacist had
then dispensed – until she was close to delivering the injection.
“Should
I have double-checked the paper script I handed out? Yes, I should have,” Dr
Ratner told TMR.
“But
I would have been medico-legally responsible [if that patient had an adverse
event].”
This does not seem like progress to me. The prescribing system
should always ask for a brand name which can then be inserted for extra certainty
that the patient will actually get what is intended by the clinician. The nudge
to generics becomes a bit more than that as it presently works it seems.
Integrating electronic prescriptions
into pharmacy operations
The rollout of electronic prescriptions has
expanded significantly over the past few months, with 97 per cent of all
PBS-approved pharmacies now dispensing electronic prescription tokens.
The next phase in the rollout of electronic
prescriptions is the Active Script List (ASL) in which a patient’s electronic
prescriptions are consolidated in a digital list and can be accessed at any
pharmacy without the need for tokens.
The ASL has multiple benefits for patients
and pharmacists, particularly for those who take multiple medications.
The ASL framework has progressed through beta
testing and will be available to pharmacies over the coming months, depending
on their location and dispensary software provider.
Guild
Learning and Development has collaborated with the Australian Digital Health
Agency to create an online module titled Integrating electronic prescriptions
into your pharmacy operations.
The
module discusses the practical implementation of electronic prescriptions, with
a focus on workflow considerations, privacy and consent considerations related
to the ASL, as well as electronic prescription troubleshooting advice.
To
enrol in this course please visit guilded.guild.org.au
One year on from the launch of
electronic prescriptions in Australia where are we at now? And what are the next
steps?
Was it only a year ago that Australia’s first
paperless electronic prescription in primary care was successfully prescribed
and dispensed?
Amazingly, it was on Wednesday 6 May 2020
that an e-script—which used the “token” model—was prescribed by Dr David Corbet
at Anglesea Medical in Victoria and dispensed by pharmacist Jason Bratuskins at
Anglesea Pharmacy.
From this simple beginning only a year ago,
the use of ePrescriptions has skyrocketed, helped no doubt by the COVID-inspired
growth of all things electronic and remote in healthcare.
According to the Australian Digital Health
Agency, there have now (as of 9 April) been more than six million ePrescriptions
issued to Australians.
This
includes 3.5 million original ePrescriptions from prescribers and 2.5 million
ePrescriptions as repeat scripts issued by pharmacies.
Almost
all pharmacies around the nation have dispensed an electronic prescription.
“The
majority of Australians can now choose an electronic prescription as an alternative
to a paper prescription from their doctor when needing medicines,” Andrew Matthews,
director, Medicines Safety Program at the Australian Digital Health Agency told
the AJP.
“At
least 97% of PBS approved pharmacies have dispensed ePrescriptions. Prescribers
can be confident that if a patient prefers an electronic prescription from their
doctor over a paper prescription, they will be able to get this dispensed at
their local community pharmacy.”
Getting active
Most
experts say the next step in the evolution of Australia’s ePrescription program
will come with the full national availability of the new Active Script List
program, expected to occur by the end of 2021.
Active
Script List (ASL) is a list of all active prescriptions and repeats available
to be dispensed for a patient. It is a pharmacy-assisted service for accessing
patient ePrescriptions for the supply of medicines.
The
list has been trialled at 10 sites with 280 patients, Mr Matthews told delegates
at the E-medication Management Conference in Sydney in late March. It will
become “progressively more available” from April onwards, he said.
The
patient can register for the list and can set options for which health professionals
they wish to see or access this information.
“Pharmacy
is the conduit through which a patient will manage their ASL, with pharmacy’s
role including offering assisted registration for patients,” he said.
An
example of how the system could work is if a patient is on holiday and needed
to obtain a repeat prescription.
“They
could elect to allow a pharmacy that is not their regular pharmacy to access
their ASL information for one or two days so their prescription could be
dispensed,” Mr Matthews said.
“After
that date, the nominated pharmacy would no longer be able to access this
information.”
The dispensing pharmacy “can access an electronic prescription for a patient
from an ASL following proof of identity.”
The
patient also has the capacity to instruct a prescriber to withhold scripts from
the ASL.
One advantage of the system was that it removed the need for the patient to
receive their tokens via SMS or email and retain their tokens, Mr Matthews
said.
ADHA
data indicated that currently around 85% of ePrescriptions are sent via SMS, he
added.
Managing the workload
There
were concerns expressed by pharmacists about the impact on workflows, which he
believed had been addressed during testing on its integrating into day to day
practice.
Full
system functionality should be achieved “soon”, Andrew Matthews said, while the
privacy framework was also being finalised “at the moment”.
He
also noted there are currently three apps (MedAdvisor, Medmate and GuildLink)
that are conformant for ePrescribing and offering a token management solution.
In
addition, the agency has reported generally good collaboration between professions
during the initial development and growth process.
“Feedback
to the Agency through clinical peak bodies has been that communication between
local general practices and community pharmacies about readiness to write and
dispense electronic prescriptions has been another good example of the collaboration
between community pharmacy and general practice,” said Mr Matthews.
For
more on this article, see our May AJP magazine or e-magazine
It is well worth reading this article carefully. Frankly I am
a little worried that the complexity of the patient interaction with the
pharmacist may mean all sorts of issues emerge as the roll-out continues. There
seems to be a real set of privacy and security issues come to notice as the
roll out continues.
I look forward to feedback from the field regarding glitches
emerging as we move forward!
As you can see from this article the technology is still very
new!
My
Script List provides pharmacies with a complete digital list of a patient’s
current prescriptions and repeats
Fred
IT Group has launched Australia’s first digital script list, called My Script
List, beginning with pharmacies across Tasmania.
My
Script List was activated in all Tasmanian pharmacies on Thursday, and is
expected to roll out to remaining states and territories over the coming weeks.
It
is Australia’s first iteration of a Department of Health conformant Active
Script List (ASL), providing an alternative to the token model which launched in May last year.
More
than 6.5 million electronic prescriptions were created and 4.2 million
dispensed in the first six months since the launch of the token model.
“We
think ASL will be the predominant model over time, for convenience and utility
particularly for patients,” David Freemantle, General Manager of eHealth at
Fred IT Group told AJP.
The
token model can become difficult to juggle for patients who are on multiple
medications as it generates a separate token for each prescription and repeat,
he explained.
Meanwhile
My Script List combines the patient’s electronic prescriptions in one digital
list.
“The
target market is patients for whom pharmacists keep their scripts on file,”
said Mr Freemantle. However he hopes that as more patients learn about it, use
of My Script List “should become ubiquitous”.
“If
your phone becomes flat or lost you can’t access the token, but if [your
prescription] is on the My Script List then you can still access it,” he said.
“We think it really makes e-scripts make sense.”
Paul
Naismith, pharmacist and CEO of the Fred IT Group, added that My Script List
will substantially reduce the administrative burden associated with managing
and dispensing prescriptions.
“This
is extremely important for pharmacies that are supporting patients with
multiple prescriptions and chronic health conditions,” said Mr Naismith.
“It
means that pharmacists can therefore spend time where they need to – supporting
the health care needs of their patients.”
Fred
IT Group has been running eight pilot sites for three months, ramping up to 12
sites over the past few weeks.
On
Thursday 22 April, Tasmanian pharmacies were the first to receive access to My
Script List outside of these pilot sites.
“My
Script List has provided us with better visibility of our patients’ current
prescriptions,” said Joseph O’Malley, pharmacist and proprietor of Westside
Pharmacy in Ulverstone, Tasmania, and PDL Director.
“This
helps us to reduce the pressure that patients experience, as they no longer
need to worry about remembering their scripts or sorting through tokens on
their phone.
“Instead,
they simply come in and talk to us and let us manage their prescriptions. My
Script List has also removed the need to keep scripts on file, so is much
easier to manage than printing and filling paper prescriptions.”
Patients
can choose to access My Script List once it becomes available in their state or
territory by contacting their pharmacist or GP and providing their consent.
This
patient-controlled access can be ongoing or for a short period of time. Once
granted access to this list, a pharmacy may dispense the items requested by the
patient.
Similarly
doctors and third-party intermediaries, with patient consent, can view the
active list of scripts.
"Active Script List (ASL) is a list of all active prescriptions and repeats available to be dispensed for a patient."
Is this just a list of prescriptions and their repeats?
Does the ASL contain anything else, such as the instructions given to the patient?
Not all medicines are taken regularly. I have had a joint replaced and my surgeon has told me that if I see a dentist and there is a risk of bleeding, I must take a large, one-off dose of antibiotics first. I can request a script from my dentist and be given a script for one or several multiples of the dose, depending on the treatment.
Would any of this information be included in the ASL?
I wonder just how much analysis has been done to fully understand the many different scenarios and the processes that have to be implemented by everyone to make this thing work. Especially the exceptions to the rule.
ACTIVE SCRIPT LIST (ASL) means what exactly? 1. A single list of medicines prescribed 'today'?
2. A single list of medicines prescribed 'today' added to other medicines prescribed previously ('yesterday', 'last week' or 'two weeks ago' or 'longer') and which are still current?
3. A single list of all medicines which have been prescribed and which the patient is currently taking but not those medicines which the doctor has 'told the patient to stop taking' because he has substituted them with another alternative even though the the patient has a supply (dispensed) of the medicine which has been substituted by the 'new replacement' medicine? In this instance does the ASL show that the old medicine has now been substituted and is no longer to be taken by the patient or dispensed?
I think you will find it is a “list” nothing more, maybe nothing less. After 15-20 years of terminology and clinical modelling you are within reason to expect a little more from that data. Odd how both clinical terminology and clinical information modelling have all but faded from the menu, odd as in they are the two aspects related directly to the primary aims of eHealth.
4 comments:
I have some questions re:
"Active Script List (ASL) is a list of all active prescriptions and repeats available to be dispensed for a patient."
Is this just a list of prescriptions and their repeats?
Does the ASL contain anything else, such as the instructions given to the patient?
Not all medicines are taken regularly. I have had a joint replaced and my surgeon has told me that if I see a dentist and there is a risk of bleeding, I must take a large, one-off dose of antibiotics first. I can request a script from my dentist and be given a script for one or several multiples of the dose, depending on the treatment.
Would any of this information be included in the ASL?
I wonder just how much analysis has been done to fully understand the many different scenarios and the processes that have to be implemented by everyone to make this thing work. Especially the exceptions to the rule.
ACTIVE SCRIPT LIST (ASL) means what exactly?
1. A single list of medicines prescribed 'today'?
2. A single list of medicines prescribed 'today' added to other medicines prescribed previously ('yesterday', 'last week' or 'two weeks ago' or 'longer') and which are still current?
3. A single list of all medicines which have been prescribed and which the patient is currently taking but not those medicines which the doctor has 'told the patient to stop taking' because he has substituted them with another alternative even though the the patient has a supply (dispensed) of the medicine which has been substituted by the 'new replacement' medicine? In this instance does the ASL show that the old medicine has now been substituted and is no longer to be taken by the patient or dispensed?
That should do for starters.
and does the ASL show that the patient had an allergic reaction and should not take it again, ever?
I think you will find it is a “list” nothing more, maybe nothing less. After 15-20 years of terminology and clinical modelling you are within reason to expect a little more from that data. Odd how both clinical terminology and clinical information modelling have all but faded from the menu, odd as in they are the two aspects related directly to the primary aims of eHealth.
Post a Comment