This popped up a few days ago!
CIA now favours lab leak theory on origins of Covid-19
Michael R. Gordon and Dustin Volz
26 Jan, 2025
Dow Jones
The Central Intelligence Agency has now concluded that the deadly Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak, lending credibility to a view that has been the focus of sharp debate among scientists and politicians for years.
In doing so, the CIA has now joined the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Energy Department in identifying a laboratory mishap in Wuhan, China as the probable source of the Covid-19 virus. It has killed more than 1.2 million Americans and over seven million people worldwide.
“CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the Covid-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,” an agency spokesman said in a statement released Saturday.
The spokesman added that the judgment was “low confidence” and that the CIA would continue to evaluate “any available credible new intelligence reporting or open-source information that could change CIA’s assessment.”
The agency had previously taken the stance that it didn’t have enough information to assess whether the virus had leapt from an animal to a human or arose from a laboratory mishap.
Covid-19 emerged in Wuhan in late 2019 and then spread rapidly through the world in 2020 and 2021 before the development of vaccines helped limit deaths. It marked one of the worst pandemics in modern history.
But the origins of the virus still divides the U.S. intelligence community, in large part because the Chinese government hasn’t co-operated with international investigations.
Four U.S. intelligence agencies have favoured, with low confidence, the animal transmission theory. So has the National Intelligence Council, a body of senior intelligence officers who reports to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
John Ratcliffe, the new director of the CIA confirmed earlier this week by the Senate, has long said he thought the lab leak theory was the most plausible explanation.
In an interview with Breitbart published Friday, Ratcliffe said investigating the issue was a top priority that he wanted to tackle on “day one.”
Officials familiar with the matter said the agency has been continuing its work on the question since the virus arose. The agency said in its Saturday statement that “both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible.”
The New York Times earlier reported on the new judgment.
A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington didn’t respond to a request for comment.
A former FBI senior scientist told The Wall Street Journal in December that a fresh look at the virus’s origin and the intelligence-community reports on the issue, was needed.
In the waning days of the Biden administration, Jake Sullivan, Joe Biden’s national-security adviser, called for establishing a panel of outside experts to take a fresh look at the intelligence agencies’ findings.
The debate over Covid origins at times has been heavily politicised. During his first term in office, President Trump blamed Beijing for what he called the “China virus,” while his Democratic critics at the time said the White House was trying to divert attention from its management of the response to the pandemic.
While the natural transmission theory was initially the dominant view within the intelligence community, the debate over Covid’s origins has shifted considerably over the past several years. No host animal that might have transmitted the virus has been found, while experts have raised concerns that precautions for containing biological agents at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were inadequate.
The FBI, which was the first intelligence agency to point to a lab leak as a likely explanation, made its judgment with “moderate confidence,” while the Energy Department and CIA’s views were made with low confidence.
The CIA issued its low confidence judgment after former CIA Director William Burns directed the agency to take a position on the origins rather than remain agnostic, according to officials familiar with the matter, though he didn’t urge a particular conclusion. The updated analysis, which wasn’t based on specific new intelligence, was published internally at the agency before Ratcliffe’s arrival, the officials said.
Sen. Tom Cotton, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, applauded the CIA for releasing its new judgment, which he called “the most plausible explanation of Covid’s origins.”
He added: “Now, the most important thing is to make China pay for unleashing a plague on the world.”
The Wall Street Journal
Here is the link:
I think the bottom line here is that we will never know – but that the US needs someone to blame given the huge death toll in the US.
David.
3 comments:
A lot more information on the role of the WHO in this:
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/implications-of-the-us-withdrawing?r=tryyp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
"What Really Happened in Wuhan" by Sharri Markson (book & documentary) points to multi-national involvement.
There is a theory that COVID like plagues of old was not cooked up in a lab but was a result of nature, something we are still discovering. As for the large death toll in the US. I think that is clear to a vast majority. Even those who voted for a second series. Perhaps the current wave of oddities is a consequence of Covid
Post a Comment