Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

The Canadian Auditor General Reviews Health Infoway. Facts are Good!

If ever there was a difference between the spin and what was really said we see it here.

Here is what Infoway said of the review.

Open Letter to Canadians

The Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) has issued its report on our organization, Canada Health Infoway (Infoway), and we welcome their insights and helpful suggestions.

These reports are vital; they provide you with the information you need and deserve to judge how well your tax money is being spent, and they provide useful analysis and advice to the organizations being audited.

What’s in the report

We’re very pleased that the Auditor General found that Infoway, in her words, has accomplished much in the eight years since we were established. While we still have a lot of work ahead of us to achieve our ambitious goals, this audit tells us we are on the right track. It acknowledges that we have been working with “due regard” for taxpayers' money, and that we have sound systems in place for managing projects efficiently.

The Auditor General provides us with important recommendations for making Infoway even more efficient and effective. We accept all of her recommendations wholeheartedly and will implement initiatives to address every recommendation by March 31 of next year – just five months away. In fact, we had already started doing a number of the things the OAG refers to in its report – because we recognized they made sense and felt they were appropriate to implement as soon as possible (Read the full list of recommendations and our responses.).

Infoway and eHealth Ontario

Of course, the Auditor General’s report has drawn extra attention because of the concerns over the provincial e-health initiative in Ontario. While our organization is also involved in helping create electronic health records (EHRs) for Canadians, it is important to understand that Infoway has not had any contracts with eHealth Ontario nor its predecessor, the Smart Systems for Health Agency (SSHA).

That said, we have funded some key projects in Ontario – for example, putting a viewer in emergency rooms throughout the province to provide medication histories for seniors, contributing to a system to help reduce wait times, funding the expansion of telemedicine initiatives. Our primary role is to set the national strategy and standards for EHR systems, aid capable organizations that are developing them, and ensure that all of these systems being implemented across the country will be able to link to one another in the future.

Infoway’s strict rules

Infoway has to operate under strict funding requirements set by the federal government. We fund projects once deliverables have been completed and the standards have been met. Generally, we assign half the funding to the development of a system; the remaining half would be paid only when the system has been developed and demonstrated use levels have been achieved. We believe there is no point investing in technology that is not being used.

Working under these clear policies, to date we have spent just over half of the money allocated to us. The other half of the funds, while earmarked for jurisdictions, will remain unspent until projects are delivered and health care providers begin using the system.

Success stories

Infoway has worked with every province and territory, supporting almost 300 EHR projects nation-wide. The results are improving the quality of health care, reducing wait times, avoiding costly and dangerous errors, improving access in remote and rural communities, and cutting costs for taxpayers. For example:

  • We have helped fund systems to transfer X-rays and other medical imaging to digital formats. This will ultimately save up to one billion dollars a year (when fully implemented) and importantly has increased radiologist productivity by 23%, getting patients their tests and treatments faster.
  • In British Columbia, we are upgrading and enhancing the province’s existing PharmaNet system which gives pharmacists electronic access to complete health records. Last year, 2.5 million potential cases of drug interactions were avoided that could have led to serious complications or even death.
  • In Alberta, the WebSMR system we helped fund has improved post-surgical reporting from a month in most cases to less than an hour 91% of the time. That’s a significant breakthrough in post-surgical care.
  • In Ontario, the Ontario Drug Profile Viewer has been implemented in emergency departments in 177 hospitals. This system enables health professionals in emergency departments to instantly access drug information for Ontario’s seniors. In September 2009, the system was used to view medication information over 95,000 times.
  • The investments that Infoway has been making in the area of telemedicine are making a substantial impact throughout Canada. In Ontario, Infoway’s support has enabled the expansion of the Ontario Telemedicine Network, through which over 2,000 health care professionals are now delivering care to over 660 rural and remote sites throughout the province.
  • All communities north of 60 are telehealth enabled or are in the process of being so. Infoway is on track to get 40% of First Nations communities telehealth-enabled with focus on mental health and drug addiction services.

We’re pleased to say these are only a few examples of how Infoway’s efforts to support EHRs are improving health care across the country. See how EHR systems are delivering tangible benefits to Canadians today.

Why this matters to you

As a taxpayer, you deserve to know that we have been using public funds wisely. The Auditor General concludes that we have made good use of public funds; she also made eight recommendations to further strengthen our reporting abilities, contracting processes and documentation (Infoway accepts these recommendations and has already implemented a number of initiatives in response to the Auditor General’s recommendations; we will implement changes to address any outstanding issues by March 31, 2010).

As a Canadian, you deserve to have the best possible health care system – one that is available when and where you and your family need it, that provides high quality care and that does not waste your tax money.

Electronic health records are helping to accomplish all of these goals. When we’ve finished our work, all authorized health care practitioners will have your health information at their fingertips wherever it’s needed. There won’t be any time wasted tracking down your records or repeating tests before you can get your treatment. Potentially dangerous drug errors or inadvisable treatments can be avoided. And the ease and speed of EHRs will continue to reduce the cost burden for taxpayers.

Previous generations built up a health care system in Canada that is the envy of the world. It’s our challenge now to preserve and improve that system, using the power of modern technology. At Infoway, we are proud of our efforts and achievements to date and are completely committed to our goal of better health care for you and your family.

Sincerely,

Richard C. Alvarez
President and Chief Executive Officer

Source:

http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/lang-en/about-infoway/news/open-letter-to-canadians

Here is what was recommended and the responses – getting closer to reality!

OAG Recommendations and Infoway Responses

The Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) began an audit of Canada Health Infoway (Infoway) in February 2008. The results of the Infoway audit were tabled in the House of Commons on November 3, 2009.

The eight recommendations contained in the report are noted below, along with Infoway’s responses:

Setting direction

  1. To ensure Parliament and Canadians properly understand Infoway’s goal, the Corporation should further explain in its public reports what is meant by having an electronic health record available to authorized health care professionals.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree with the recommendation and we will make additional efforts to elaborate on the goal of having an electronic health record available to authorized health care providers in our public reporting commencing with our 2009-10 Annual Report and/or the 2010-11 Corporate Business Plan.

Implementation of electronic health records is a complex task, as is reporting on progress. We have made continuous improvements to progress reporting and will continue to enhance our reporting in the future.

Infoway reports on a regular basis jurisdictional progress to making electronic health records available to Canadians. For example, we provide Members of Parliament and Senators with copies of our Annual Report and Corporate Business Plan. We also post these materials on our website to help ensure the broadest possible distribution to Canadians.

  1. Infoway should review and strengthen its management controls over contracting for goods and services to reduce the risk of contract disputes.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree to review and analyze current practices to strengthen management controls. Improvements to management controls related to the timing of contract signatures will be put in place by to the end of the 2009-10 fiscal year.

We do not pay any invoice unless the contract is acceptably executed and the Infoway manager has certified that the product or service has been appropriately delivered by the contractor.

  1. Infoway should review its contracting policy with respect to contract amendments and extensions to ensure fairness, transparency, and disclosure to the Board.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree to review the contracting policy with respect to amendments and extensions and to present the proposed revisions to the Board for approval prior to the fourth quarter of the 2009-10 fiscal year.

Infoway’s Board-approved contracting policy was developed to respond to competitive market conditions and the often unique and rare combination of skill sets required to deliver the Corporation’s mandate. The current policy reflects the necessary balance between market competitiveness, the Corporation’s business requirements and due respect for the expenditure of public funds. We are compliant with the current policy related to the tendering of amendments and extensions and the reporting of those amendments and extensions to the Board of Directors.

Funding electronic health record projects

  1. To ensure accountability and transparency, Infoway should better document its analyses of project deliverables to support its decision to release funds.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree that there is scope for improvement to deliverables documentation and the Corporation will address this issue immediately. This will build on Infoway’s documentation process and methodology for the approval of deliverables, including the third-party claims verification process that assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the policies, controls, and systems in place for the management of Infoway-funded projects.

  1. To ensure that standards will be properly implemented in the five core systems of an electronic health record, Infoway should obtain from the provinces and territories the results of conformance testing on systems it will fund, and obtain assurance that non-conformance issues, if any, will be resolved.

Infoway’s Response:

On a go forward basis, for new investment approvals, and with the co-operation of the jurisdictions, we agree to work to obtain the results of conformance testing from the jurisdictions on the five core electronic health record systems we will fund in the future and obtain assurance that non-conformance issues, if any, will be resolved.

We have acknowledged that there will be variations in systems requirements and thus standards requirements within jurisdictions. Jurisdictions have the mandate and authority to ensure conformance and perform user acceptance testing to their specific requirements. They are most familiar with those requirements and are best positioned to ensure they are met. Some differences are valid within a specification and require no action, whereas some are due to different maintenance releases of a standard used by various jurisdictions largely driven by their timeline for implementation. Despite variances in standards conformance, the use of a standard within a jurisdiction will ensure interoperability within that jurisdiction.

Pan-Canadian interoperability can still be achieved and differences in standards can be mitigated by

  • ensuring the same standard is used for cross-jurisdictional interoperability, or
  • mapping to accommodate differences in the implementation of the standard. We believe that this is not only feasible but also practical and cost effective.

Reporting on results

  1. To ensure Parliament and Canadians have sufficient information about progress achieved, Infoway should report on the extent to which electronic health record systems have been adopted by health care professionals and are compliant with standards.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree with the recommendation, recognizing, however, that solution implementation and availability must be completed before adoption can occur. These major project initiatives often take 24 to 36 months to be fully implemented.

Infoway, in conjunction with the jurisdictions, will endeavour to develop measures on the extent to which EHR systems have been adopted by health care providers. Further, Infoway will work with jurisdictions to develop a standards compliance report.

  1. To ensure Parliament and Canadians have sufficient information about progress achieved, Infoway should report on results achieved compared with expected results and explain any difference.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree to report on variances between expected results and achievements related to the electronic health record goal line in our public reporting beginning with the 2009-10 Annual Report.

This will build on the Corporation’s existing reporting on expected results and actual performance in our Annual Report (in the section entitled, Delivering Results: Performance Against Objectives). We provide Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators with copies of our Annual Report and Corporate Business Plan. Last year, we undertook an initiative (which we plan to repeat annually) to provide MPs and Senators with jurisdictional fact sheets to highlight EHR advancements within their respective region.

  1. To ensure Parliament and Canadians have sufficient information about progress achieved, Infoway should report on the results achieved for performance targets established for each core system of the electronic health record.

Infoway’s Response:

We agree with the recommendation. The Corporation will need to finalize its work with the jurisdictions on both data availability and data quality, to ensure that additional reporting will be accurate. This will build on the Corporation’s existing reports on the value, benefits, and advancement that electronic health record systems are delivering to Canadians through our proactive media relations efforts, corporate materials, and the Internet, as well as through hundreds of public presentation and speaking engagements.

Link here:

http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/about-infoway/news/open-letter-to-canadians/oag-recommendations-and-infoway-responses

And now what were the actual audit findings you ask (my emphaisis):

What we found

  • Infoway has accomplished much in the eight years since its creation. Using the funding agreements with Health Canada as a starting point, Infoway developed an approach to providing for compatible electronic health records by identifying the key requirements and components of an EHR and developing a blueprint for the design of health information systems. It consulted widely with partners and stakeholders to obtain their input and support. In addition, it established appropriate governance mechanisms and developed a risk management strategy. It has implemented appropriate management controls for operational spending, although controls for contracting for goods and services need to be strengthened.
  • In the 29 EHR projects we examined, Infoway had ensured that provinces and territories designed the projects to comply with requirements such as its blueprint and standards. It had also identified project-specific risks and was monitoring them, as well as other problems that arose during the life of the project. However, Infoway has not obtained the results of conformance testing on EHR systems. This means it does not have sufficient assurance that standards have been implemented as required.
  • Infoway has made considerable efforts to report on the progress of the EHR initiative. It reports progress toward its 2010 goal as the percentage of Canadians living in provinces or territories where an EHR is available to their health care professionals. However, it has not reported on other indicators of progress, such as the extent to which completed systems meet requirements for compatibility. Nor does it report on the adoption or use of completed systems by health care professionals, although it considers low adoption rates a serious risk to the EHR initiative.
  • As the sponsoring department, Health Canada periodically obtains assurance through audits and evaluations that Infoway is complying with the funding agreements. However, at the time of the audit, the Department still had not fully developed the monitoring framework it approved in 2008 to manage risks associated with such large amounts of funding and to strengthen ongoing monitoring of the Corporation.

See here:

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200911_04_e_33205.html

In summary, the contract controls were not up to scratch, the systems were not implemented to the agreed standards, adoption has been very slow and expenditure is not being monitored properly.

It is hard work to get to the truth with all the spin and gloss!

It would be interesting to see what our Auditor General would make of our five year old NEHTA.

David.

Weekly Australian Health IT Links - 01-11-2009

Here are a few I have come across this week.

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/News/0,1734,5526,26200910.aspx

Rural GPs espouse online mental health training

Andrew Bracey - Monday, 26 October 2009

AN interactive online mental health training program is drawing together isolated rural doctors in online learning communities.

The ACRRM-run program allows GPs to log into an interactive learning module to discuss patients' mental health issues with colleagues across the country and ask questions of trainers.

-----

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26271153-15306,00.html

Hospitals need open source in IT: expert

Karen Dearne | October 28, 2009

OPEN source software offers one cure for clinical system implementation woes, as authorities struggle to find solutions that meet all medical requirements, a leading health informatics researcher says.

-----

http://www.prwire.com.au/pr/15220/isoft-selects-intranet-dashboard-for-global-rollout

iSOFT selects Intranet DASHBOARD for global rollout

Melbourne, Australia: Thursday 29 October 2009 – iSOFT, a leading global provider of healthcare IT solutions, has selected Intranet DASHBOARD (iD) as its new group-wide communications platform for its 4,700 employees located across the globe.

-----

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26277668-23289,00.html

Cyber aid to quitting smoking

October 30, 2009

Article from: The Australian

WASHINGTON: Battling one's cigarette demons in a virtual world may prove to be an effective way to help people quit smoking, a research team has found in a preliminary study.

-----

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26280953-15306,00.html

Medicare settles Thelma dispute

Karen Dearne | October 30, 2009

MEDICARE Australia has settled an alleged anti-competitive action, agreeing to pay $460,000 to Thelma, a wholly owned subsidiary of listed health transactions provider ICSGlobal, a month before the matter was due to return to the Federal Court.

-----

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26268194-15306,00.html

NSW unveils data centre reform plans

Fran Foo | October 28, 2009

THE NSW Government has released long-awaited details of its data centre consolidation project, calling for two purpose-built green data centres to be developed and run by the private sector.

NSW government CIO Emmanuel Rodriguez has realised his vision for data centre consolidation.

The Departments of Health and Education will act as anchor tenants, with facilities to be fully operational in 2011 at either new or existing sites.

-----

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26262923-15306,00.html

Rethink on medical imaging radiation to cut risks

Jennifer Foreshew | October 27, 2009

A COMPUTER program that aims to make radiography imaging safer for patients by minimising their radiation exposure is expected to be tested in a clinical environment next year.

-----

http://www.pharmacynews.com.au/article/profession-failing-the-health-system-menadue/503548.aspx

Profession failing the health system: Menadue

27 October 2009 | by Simone Roberts

Pharmacists have been criticised for their lack of innovation and unwillingness to change in a damning assessment of the profession from an outsider.

John Menadue, a director at the Centre for Policy Development and the chair of a number of recent major health reviews, told delegates at the Pharmacy Australia Congress this month that pharmacists had failed to respond to the health system's need for them to do more in their professional capacity.

-----

http://www.techworld.com.au/article/324380/ubuntu_9_10_karmic_koala_release_gives_kde_boost

Ubuntu 9.10 'Karmic Koala' release gives KDE a boost

Release paves way for more KDE on netbooks

Rodney Gedda (CIO) 30/10/2009 09:32:00

Kubuntu 9.10 ships the new and improved 4.3 KDE interface

Open source software vendor Canonical has released the new version of its Linux-based Ubuntu operating system, Ubuntu 9.10 -- codenamed "Karmic Koala" -- and with it comes a number of updates to improve the KDE experience.

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

News Alert: Secret e-health reports to be released.

Secret e-health reports to be released

Karen Dearne | November 03, 2009

AS the Rudd government prepares legislation to support the introduction of a national healthcare identity scheme linked to Medicare numbers, three separate investigations on privacy concerns conducted over the past three years are finally to be made public.

Lots more here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26299677-15306,00.html

I am sure there will be some interesting comments in due course.

David.

This Man is Going to be the Next UK Prime Minister and He Has a Plan!

The following appeared a day or so ago:

Tories promise records for all

02 Nov 2009

Patient-held records are one of the Conservative Party's priorities for health, according to plans published today.

The party said it would carry out a full consultation on how to move to patient-held records with a view to introducing them throughout the NHS.

In a speech at the Royal College of Pathologists, party leader David Cameron said patient-held records would put patients in control and allow resources to be pushed from bureaucrats to professionals and patients.

He added: “When Labour were deciding how to store people’s health record, they commissioned a massive, bureaucratic IT project and spent billions of pounds on a centralised database.

“Our approach is to say that today, in the post-bureaucratic age, you don’t need a massive central computer to do this.”

Cameron said ‘one option’ would be for patients to store their health records online although he did not refer to commercial health platforms such as Google Health and Microsft’s HealthVault which have been widely mooted in connection with his party's health plans.

The proposals published today indicate that the Conservatives want a system wide reform of the NHS, focusing on five priorities: creating a patient-led NHS, measuring health outcomes, putting healthcare professionals in charge of delivering care, focusing government action on improving public health and reforming long-term care.

Priorities include a pledge to ‘restructure’ Choose and Book to enable all referrals to be made to a named consultant - an option that is currently left to individual trust departments to activate - and to widen the number of providers on the system.

The published priorities do not include any further detail on the Conservatives' plans to dismantle the National Programme for IT in the NHS' central infrastructure, as outlined earlier this year.

More here:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/5342/tories_promise_records_for_all

Link: David Cameron's speech on the Conservative Party website

I wonder is this plan more sensible than what we had from the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission here?

Time will tell I guess.

I note that a recent survey showed most were not keen on sticking with the NHS PHR (Healthspace)

More news: The survey also revealed strong support for the NHS' personal health record platform, HealthSpace; and a lack of support for companies like Microsoft and Google holding health records.

Link is in the text.

The good thing here is that at least there is substantial political interest in the topic – which is more we can say for OZ as far as I can tell.

David.

Monday, November 02, 2009

Electronic Prescription Transfer – Talk About NEHTA Under Delivering Again!

As mentioned a day or so ago, NEHTA have just released their first attempt at ETP (Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions) documentation.

These can be found here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/e-communications-in-practice/emedication-management

The summary release document has the file name:

NEHTA_0544_2009 Electronic Transfer of Prescription Draft Release 1 0 - Release Notification v0 6

And the most interesting document I find is the one named:

ETP Concept of Operations_Release_1_v1 Draft

Some of the more interesting things found in this document are the following:

“NEHTA’s e-Medication Management program has been tasked to develop key specifications required for software vendors, GPs and Pharmacists to establish a national environment for standardised electronic prescription exchange, one where prescriptions can be sent securely and reliably to community pharmacists, while maintaining the consumer's right to their own choice of pharmacy.”

Release Notification Page 1.

What this actually says is that we are working on a system that won’t allow the patient to direct the prescription to where they want (as is done elsewhere). We want to create a central infrastructure where all prescription data will flow through. Of course this will also be where we (the Pharmacy Guild) can collect a fee for each prescription that flows through.

The proposed design also responds to the paranoia held by community pharmacy regarding doctors being able to suggest one pharmacist in preference to another – something pharmacists have always been able to do regarding doctors.

At present is fails also to note how consumers would also like to be able to arrange delivery of their medicine from their doctors surgery and other even more consumer friendly ideas (Thanks Heather Grain for pointing this out)

Of course point to point transmission can be made simpler and more secure but we won’t do that – we are going for a complex SOA based store and forward approach.

Next we have:

“The following will be released shortly:

• e-Prescribing Structured Document Template

• Dispensing Record Structured Document Template

• Secure Messaging End Point Specification “

Release Notification Page 2.

Opps! We have not quite worked out the structure of the prescriptions we plan to send or their content!. One would think that was pretty basic!

Actually it seems to be worse than even that.

Page 19 of the Concept of Operations Document we find.

“The components of the goal-state architecture are:

Prescription Exchange Service (PES): The PES may require additional interfaces, beyond those specified in ETP Release 1, in order to support integration with potential national IEHR repositories, research repositories and (possibly) Medicare Australia systems. The interfaces used by an Electronic Prescribing System or an Electronic Dispensing System to manage the prescribing-dispensing processes, however, will not require any changes.

Electronic Prescribing Systems (EPS): ETP Release 1 supports the optional use of national standard clinical terminologies including SNOMED-CT and the Australian Medications Terminology (AMT) in e- Prescriptions. The goal-state is, however, to make the use of standard clinical terminologies mandatory.

Electronic Dispensing Systems (EDS): ETP Release 1 supports the optional use of national standard clinical terminologies including SNOMED-CT and the Australian Medications Terminology (AMT) in Dispense Records. The goal-state is, however, to make the use of standard clinical terminologies mandatory.”

Translated the Australian Medicines Terminology and SNOMED are, and will be for a while, optional. Just how long have we been waiting – only to be now told:

Page 18 of Information Model

ePrescriptionItem.MedicationItem

- MedicationItem

This class is the entry point that contains a detailed description of a single, unique good that is listed as an item within an ePrescription.

MedicationItem.Description

The description of the prescribed item as defined by the prescriber. This text representation encapsulates all relevant concepts associated with describing an item, i.e. brand/trade or generic name, strength, form, etc.

When prescribers are describing a medication, they may do so at differing levels of specificity, depending upon the clinical context, the healthcare setting, the type of medication being prescribed, their knowledge of specific drugs, the functionality of their prescribing system and other factors.”

So the guts of NEHTA’s ETP system is the sharing of free text. Just amazing and symptomatic of the leadership we are getting from NEHTA.

More interesting is the scope of what these 5 documents are about (Page 9 of Concept document):

“NEHTA has identified five distinct capabilities for comprehensive eMM:

1. Exchange of electronic prescribing and dispensing messages:

this capability is concerned with the generation and exchange of electronic records that represent prescriptions and their associated dispensing records.

2. Adherence monitoring: this capability supports the ability to inform authorised healthcare providers and individuals when deviations from the expected sequence of dispensing events are detected. Adherence monitoring requires records of an individual’s prescribed and dispensed medications – it will make use of the electronic prescribing and dispensing records described in the previous paragraph.

3. Current Medication Lists: this capability supports the storage of medication reviews that are performed by healthcare providers. The documents produced by these medications reviews are referred to as “current medication lists” (CMLs). CMLs are either stored in dedicated CML repositories or are stored, along with other types of individual electronic healthcare records, in general purpose IEHR repositories. In either case the repositories make CMLs available to the individual, their authorised representatives and to authorised healthcare providers.

4. Medication History Lists: this capability supports the storage of a chronological record of an individual’s prescribed and dispensed medications. These records comprise a Medication History List (MHL) for each individual. MHLs are either stored in dedicated MHL repositories or are stored, along with other types of individual electronic healthcare records, in general purpose IEHR repositories. In either case the repositories make MHLs available to the individual and their authorised representatives and to the healthcare providers who require this information to service the individual and are authorised to do so by the individual.

5. Medication Decision Support and Secondary Uses: It is intended that medications management processes are supported by prescribing and dispensing decision support tools (integrated into prescribing dispensing and administration applications) that implement best practices based on evidence. This capability therefore includes the collection, storage and analysis of more complete and more detailed consumer medications data than is currently possible and the use of this data to derive appropriate rules for decision support tools.

The above five capabilities reflect various stages in the evolution of eMM and are not to be taken directly as a roadmap for national implementation across all the various different healthcare communities. Different communities will evolve to support these capabilities at different rates depending on the rate at which they can implement changes to existing policies and practices and on the rate at which the necessary underpinning e-health foundation services become available to them.”

NEHTA then goes on to say it is only point 1 they are addressing for now, the rest needs a whole heap of other things to happen and they haven’t yet.

Equally amazing is that if you look at ETP Context Diagram you find Decision Support is the last thing to be concerned with, where this is what a lot of the E-Prescribing Business Case is built on.

Second last I note this (Page 13)

“NEHTA has focused to date on specifying an ETP service that is targeted at adoption in the primary care community, and, with the expectations of this community in mind, Release 1 of the ETP service will continue to support the existing paper based processes. The goal-state of the ETP service is, however, for paperless processes to be widely available nationally.”

The detail is that what this is actually all about is basically adding a barcode to printed prescriptions to that the prescription text can be pulled down from some third party ‘cloud’ to a dispensing computer. This is just as is being already being done by eRX.

Last we have this (Page 16):

3.1 Governance and Privacy

A Governance and Privacy Management Framework will underpin the operations of the eMM services (including ETP) within the Australian healthcare sector.

This framework will be supported by legislation, participation agreements, security controls, audit and secondary uses. There are three levels of governance required:

Strategic governance is required to provide oversight of the operation of the future directions of the eMM services (e.g. Ministerial council)

Program management is required to provide oversight of the day to day activities of the eMM services (until an operational e-health entity is more formally established, NEHTA will provide overall program management with program management for specific implementation projects being the responsibility of the project principal).

Regulatory oversight is required to provide legal authority, ensure privacy compliance and regulate operations in terms of complaints handling, dispute resolution and enforcement functions (e.g. Privacy Commissioner/s and jurisdictional health regulators).

ETP Release 1 has been restricted in scope in order for it to comply with the governance and privacy management framework that is already in place for community prescribing and dispensing. Similarly it is expected that implementations of the Current Medications List service within specific communities (e.g. Aged Care) can also be constrained to comply with existing governance and privacy management frameworks.

It is expected that Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing will determine the preferred governance and privacy model for subsequent implementation initiatives. Interim arrangements for pilot projects will likely be required – these will be tailored to address specific local constraints.”

It is important to pay attention here as what we are told that we need governance we don’t have and an operational e-Health entity Minister Roxon (and Ms Halton) is not planning to pay for.

Talk about pie in the sky!

David.

Health Informatics Society of Australia (HISA) Appoints New CEO.

I just realised that because there was an e-mail to the HISA list on this topic on Friday that others who read the blog may not know this news.

Here is the announcement.

-----

Dear Members,

It is with great pleasure that I announce the appointment of Dr Louise Schaper as CEO of the Health Informatics Society of Australia commencing 9th November 2009.

Louise will be known to many of you as the Chair of the West Australian HISA Branch. She has recently completed a PhD in Health Informatics at Curtin University. With a background as an occupational therapist, Louise is a world leader in Allied Health Informatics.

The selection process was a difficult one with many very fine applicants. The Board and I are looking forward to working with Louise and her engaging enthusiasm to take our Society to the next level.

Regards,

Michael

Dr Michael Legg, PhD FAICD FAIM FACHI MACS(PCP) ARCPA

President, Health Informatics Society of Australia.

-----

Well done Louise indeed and congratulations and good luck!

David.

Sunday, November 01, 2009

I Think The Scale of Outrage Can only Build. It will Become Political Soon I Reckon!

Last week I reported on the NEHTA Annual Report.

See here for the link and download:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/10/nehta-releases-annual-report-for-2008-9.html

Since then we have had the following appear in the OZ!

NEHTA spends $26m on consultants

Karen Dearne | October 29, 2009

THE National E-Health Transition Authority spent $26.2 million - almost half its $65 million budget - on consultants in 2008-09, compared with just $2.3m the previous year.

NEHTA ended the financial year with a deficit of $2.2m, compared with a $2m surplus on taxpayer funding worth $39m in 2007-08, according to its annual report.

Funding for NEHTA is provided by the federal and state governments under a 50:50 share agreement; the jurisdictions jointly own the not-for-profit organisation and are represented on the board through their respective health department heads.

NEHTA is tasked with developing better ways of "electronically collecting and securely exchanging personal health information", including the delivery of cornerstone projects such as clinical terminologies, healthcare identifiers and secure messaging capabilities.

This year, the new independent chair, David Gonski, was joined by an independent adviser to the board, Lynda O'Grady, in February.

Ms O'Grady is managing director of strategic and operations consultancy Advanced Management Services, and is understood to have held positions with Telstra, PBL and Alcatel.

NEHTA's other large expense was employee and contractor remuneration at $30.2m, up from $27m.

Employee salaries were $21m, while contractor costs were $9.2m; at June 30, there were 190 full-time staff, including contractors.

More background here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26275833-15306,00.html

There are two major issues that have been running around in my mind about this report over the weekend.

First is the total lack or public accountability regarding the fate of $26.2M of public money. All of NEHTA’s directors have to report to the public on consultancies over about $100,000 in their annual reports. They usually say how much, what the engagement was about and who undertook the work.

So just exactly why does not NEHTA’s Annual Report provide the same detail do you suppose?

The stream of e-mail I have had about this has been pretty excited and deeply angry – and I know a range of politicians are already being asked to either explain this lapse or to ask questions in the big house on the hill in Canberra.

Regular readers of my blog will have noticed the amazing stories coming out of e-Health Ontario where there have been some major tendering irregularities. For those who came in late here is a good link:

Examining eHealth Ontario

Key players in the agency's contract and spending scandal

Last Updated: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 | 10:16 PM ET

CBC News

EHealth Ontario became embroiled in a scandal focusing on more than $5 million in untendered contracts. (CBC)

The revolving door at eHealth Ontario has been spinning quickly since the provincial agency was first fashioned out of the rubble of its failed predecessor.

Premier Dalton McGuinty proclaimed the agency's creation last September and put Dr. Alan Hudson and Sarah Kramer at its helm, in hopes the two health-care problem solvers could turn the organization around.

But seven months later, Kramer became the first to take the fall for a mounting scandal focused on more than $5 million worth of untendered contracts, conflicts of interest and anger over high-price consultants nickel-and-diming taxpayers.

The agency's goals were lofty: create an electronic health record system by 2015, cut emergency wait times and increase patient safety.

Here's a rundown of the predecessor organization, key players and the companies who received untendered contracts.

All the details here:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/07/22/f-ehealth-players-0722.html

As I thought about it I asked myself just when was the last time I saw a NEHTA tender for services or any evidence of proper competitive practice. Sadly I couldn’t remember. Oh dear, and the e-Health Ontario CEO has now gone and ministers are looking shaky. The parallels are amazing.

I am also told the Canadian Federal Auditor General is about to report on Health Infoway – a NEHTA like agency for the whole of Canada. That may make for very interesting reading as well!

Second I was thinking about this new ‘Independent Board Adviser’.

Here is some background:

http://www.pftc.com.au/pftc/about/content.asp?pageid=16&top=&menuparent=6

Lynda O'Grady - Lynda O'Grady is Managing Director of Advanced Management Services, strategic & operations consultants to a diverse range of organisations across a number of industry sectors including ICT, biomedical, manufacturing, retailing, waste and green energy. Lynda has held senior executive roles in Telstra Corporation, PBL and Alcatel. She is a member of the council of National Science & Technology Centre and Advisor to the Board of NEHTA (National Electronic Health Transition Authority).

As Advanced Management Services lacks a web site there is not much more out there!

Just what exactly has Ms O’Grady been hired for? As far as I can tell we are not to know. She is essentially unknown to the Australian e-Health community and does not appear to bring any specific expertise in that area, which was the intent of the Boston Consulting Group recommendation of 2 years ago to expand the NEHTA Board with some independent domain expertise. I am not sure previous involvement with Questacon is quite what we need!

Maybe, as a strategic consultant, she could explain to the Board the scale of public outrage they have triggered by their obfuscatory and totally unsatisfactory Annual Report. The public are only going to be taken for mugs for so long.

The risk of NEHTA blowing up like e-Health Ontario must be rising.

David.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

NEHTA Invent a Paper Based Electronic Prescribing System.

Just a quick heads up that NEHTA have released their first attempt at ETP (Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions) documentation.

These can be found here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/e-communications-in-practice/emedication-management

The key document is the Concept of Operations document. Amazingly it seems to assume just paper and no electronic transfer for now! They are also assuming there will be multiple providers of prescription repositories as best I can tell!

Comments due by 10 December 2009 – So get reading.

Read and be amused.

I may comment in detail next week as there are some great lines to be quoted.

David.

Friday, October 30, 2009

This is an Issue We Are Going to Hear Much More About.

The following was posted a day a few days ago.

Senator Grassley: You’re on Track About EMR Problems, But Here Are Some More Questions to Ask

Posted by Vince Kuraitis on October 25, 2009

Filed in EHRs/PHRs, Health Policy/Reform, Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) · Comments

An article in today’s Washington Post links to a letter written by Senator Charles E. Grassley.

The letter is directed at 10 EMR (electronic medical record) vendors, and asks very pointed questions about whether the vendors have been negligent in not addressing patient safety issues in their technologies.

Senator Grassley, you have the scent and you’re on the trail. There are several other questions you should be asking these vendors:

  • Prior to the HITECH Act, why did EMR vendors promote and government policy tolerate non-interoperable EMRs? Health care isn’t like computer operating systems — where competing, non-interoperable tech is fine. Lives are at stake.

More points here:

http://e-caremanagement.com/senator-grassley-youre-on-track-about-emr-problems-but-here-are-some-more-questions-to-ask/

I am planning to do some more work over the next few weeks on this.

Comments are more than welcome.

David.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links 26-10-2009

What I have spotted this week.

http://huffpostfund.org/stories/2009/10/fuzzy-math-rising-costs-governments-digital-health-stimulus

Fuzzy Math? Rising Costs in Government's Digital Health Stimulus

Spending Could Be Double The Obama Administration's Public Estimate of $19 Billion

By Fred Schulte
Huffington Post Investigative Fund

1:01 pm | 15 Oct 2009

Creating digital medical records for every American within the next five years – a key provision of President Obama’s stimulus package -- could cost more than twice the $19.5 billion figure that has been cited by federal officials.

-----

http://ehealtheurope.net/news/5311/private_medical_records_offered_for_sale

Private medical records offered for sale

20 Oct 2009

Medical records of patients treated at a private British hospital, The London Clinic, have been illegally sold to undercover investigators.

-----

http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/23777/?nlid=2446

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Massive Gene Database Planned in California

The data will be compared against electronic health records and patients' personal information.

By David Talbot

-----

http://www.kfsm.com/sns-ap-ks--e-healthrecords-planning,0,200292.story

Kansas to begin work on statewide system for electronic sharing of patient records

By Associated Press

4:01 AM CDT, October 22, 2009

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has applied for $9 million in federal grants to encourage physicians to switch patient records to computers.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20091023/REG/310239993

HIT sector outperforms others in third quarter: report

By Jean DerGurahian / HITS staff writer

Posted: October 23, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

The health information technology sector continued to improve in the third quarter, but the market is still waiting to see when federal funding will have an impact on profitability, analysts say.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20091023/REG/310239992

IT programs can help improve outcomes: AHRQ

By Jean DerGurahian / HITS staff writer

Posted: October 23, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Health information applications can help engage patients in their care and improve outcomes, according to research released by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

-----

http://health-care-it.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/Editorial.aspx?CC=208737

CIOs: CPOE Provision Won't be Easy to Achieve

Implementing order systems involves significant work if benefits are to be achieved, CIOs say.

By Fred Bazzoli

The use of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) is growing among U.S. health care organizations, according to results from a recent survey of members of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME).

-----

http://health-care-it.advanceweb.com/editorial/content/editorial.aspx?cc=208739

Getting Connected

Health information exchange links physician EMR systems with hospital labs.

By Charles Halfpenny

Integration of clinical systems has always been challenging. As the number of physician practices deploying electronic medical record (EMR) systems increases, so does the demand for electronically exchanging orders and results between the hospital system and the practice EMR. Without an interface, practices must manually enter results into the EMR, which is both labor-intensive and error-prone.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=72238

Standards panel explores patient access to EHRs

By Mary Mosquera

Thursday, October 22, 2009

A federal advisory panel has begun to explore how patients might access health information from their physicians and what data should be included in their personal health record. To probe the issue, participants in an Oct. 14 Health IT Standards Committee meeting examined the experience of providers who already share clinical information with their patients.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/physicians-have-doubled-their-time-online-2004

Physicians have doubled their time online since 2004

October 22, 2009 | Bernie Monegain, Editor

BOSTON – The head of a New York-based healthcare market research firm says physicians who might have spent four hours a week online in 2004 are now spending at least eight hours in front of a computer.

-----

Web 2.0 Summit: Fed CTO Talks Healthcare IT

Federal CTO Aneesh Chopra says government spending on IT can help cut healthcare costs and improve care quality.

By J. Nicholas Hoover, InformationWeek

Oct. 22, 2009

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900162

The federal government can use IT to help lower the cost and improve the quality of healthcare in the United States, federal CTO Aneesh Chopra said Wednesday.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2009/health-2-0-real-hope-beneath-the-hype.aspx

Friday, October 23, 2009

Health 2.0: Beneath the Hype, There's Cause for Real Hope

Health 2.0 is a trend accompanied by both buzz and buzzwords. That worries some advocates for the poor, underserved and just plain old and sick. Will those groups be left behind in the latest information revolution?

-----

http://www.e-health-insider.com/Features/item.cfm?&docId=314

E-prescribing

It’s almost a decade since the Audit Commission called for e-prescribing in secondary care. Progress has been slow, but that may be about to change. Daloni Carlisle reports.

There are some people who don’t follow fashion, at least not in the conventional sense. Steve Reggione, senior project manager for e-prescribing software specialist JAC is one of them.

-----

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/health/Clinic+medical+files+vanish/2127101/story.html

Clinic's medical files vanish

Privacy commission launches probe

By Ryan Cormier, Edmonton Journal

October 21, 2009

The Information and Privacy Commissioner is raising a red flag for doctors after a Fairview clinic lost two years worth of electronic patient records.

----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/it-pros-say-emr-breaches-are-all-too-common-doubt-organizational-commitment-security/2009-10-2?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Four out of five healthcare IT pros had at least one data breach last year

October 22, 2009 — 12:28pm ET | By Neil Versel

Even IT professionals in hospitals are concerned that their organizations aren't doing enough to safeguard electronic patient information, according to a newly released survey. The Traverse City, Mich.-based Ponemon Institute, with the support of security management firm LogLogic, reports that 61 percent of health IT practitioners doubt that their organizations have the resources to meet privacy and security requirements, while 70 percent say senior management isn't making data protection a priority.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/wealth-information-online-could-threaten-privacy-de-identified-emrs/2009-10-22?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Wealth of information online could threaten privacy of de-identified EMRs

October 22, 2009 — 10:01am ET | By Neil Versel

Back in 1997, it took an MIT statistician to find ways to re-identify electronic patient data that had been stripped of identifiers--using then-Massachusetts Gov. William Weld as the unsuspecting guinea pig to make a point about privacy. Nowadays, there's so much personal information widely available on the Internet that the task has become much easier, the New York Times reports.

-----

http://www.thescugogstandard.ca/news/2009/october-09/oct22-09/eHealth_inquiry-156.html

STAYING IN TOUCH

eHealth inquiry is required

By John O'Toole/The Scugog Standard

Ontario’s eHealth scandal has grown to the point where only a public inquiry can do justice to the concerns raised by opposition MPPs and indeed by virtually all taxpayers.

-----

http://www.itworldcanada.com/blogs/insights/2009/10/22/the-other-side-of-the-ehealth-story/52193/

The other side of the eHealth story

Posted Oct 22 2009, 11:07 AM by Dave Webb

Amid the flood of coverage of Auditor General Jim McCarter'sreport on out-of-control spending at eHealth Ontario -- much of it of increasingly hysterical tenor -- I received an e-mail from Aaron Blair. Blair's a former employee of Smart Systems for Health Agency, eHealth Ontario's predecessor in the initiative to bring Ontario's health-care community online, and he's troubled by the suggestion that Ontario taxpayers have nothing to show for the seven years and $1 billion invested in the effort.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20091021/REG/310219987

Growth in teleradiology market appears to lag

By Shawn Rhea / HITS staff writer

Posted: October 21, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Expansion of the teleradiology market appears to be slowing, according to a study to be published in the November issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

-----

http://fcw.com/articles/2009/10/26/cdc-side-murky-crystal-ball.aspx

A murky crystal ball?

Critics say too many systems are collecting data on disease outbreaks with little coordination among them

  • Oct 21, 2009

About 300 systems at federal, state and local agencies monitor disease outbreaks and chemical exposure. Some critics say that multiplicity is a problem.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/acquisitions-39225-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e1054:100325a:&st=email

Report: Acquisition Activity Down

HDM Breaking News, October 20, 2009

Health care information technology company stock prices have risen significantly during 2009 but acquisition activity has yet to catch up, according to a quarterly summary of vendor activity by Healthcare Growth Partners LLC, a Chicago-based strategic and financial advisory firm.

-----

Why Your Next IT Job Will Be In Healthcare

Federal stimulus billions are fueling demand for up to 50,000 new information technology positions. Most sought after are tech pros with real-world implementation experience, Windows experts, and network admins.

By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, InformationWeek

Oct. 20, 2009

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220700404

Hospitals and medical practices are scrambling to deploy e-medical record and other clinical information systems to meet federal requirements for the more than $20 billion in stimulus incentives included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. And that means many of them are expanding their IT teams to bring in the skills and expertise they need to implement these systems.

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Features/2009/Comparative-Effectiveness-Research-About-To-Hit-Prime-Time.aspx

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Comparative Effectiveness Research About To Hit Prime Time

An obscure acronym edged a little closer to the mainstream earlier this year as part of the federal stimulus debate. Now, with Congress about to dive into health reform legislation in a big way, CER may move firmly into the cultural crosshairs.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/e-prescribing-39218-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e1051:100325a:&st=email

Vermont Docs to Get Free E-Prescribing

HDM Breaking News, October 19, 2009

A $1 million federal grant to Vermont Information Technology Leaders Inc. will enable physicians in the state to access free electronic prescribing software.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/240774/topic/WS_HLM2_TEC/Five-Lessons-on-How-to-Get-Physicians-to-Adopt-CPOE.html

Five Lessons on How to Get Physicians to Adopt CPOE

Carrie Vaughan, for HealthLeaders Media, October 20, 2009

I often read or hear about "physician buy-in"—as I'm sure most of you do too—as the key component to successfully implementing many IT projects, including computerized physician order entry. While I agree that physicians need to join the effort for CPOE to be successful, I also think there is a lot more behind the successful implementations—like dogged persistence.

-----

http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23545/?nlid=2443

Prescription: Networking

A new urban network suggests how technology could remake health care.

By David Talbot

A crow flying from Vera Sinue's apartment in Boston's Roxbury neighborhood to her job as an insurance representative near the Charles River in Brighton would skirt the edge of the Longwood Medical Area, a district of medical institutions including Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Children's Hospital, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School. These institutions are among the nation's most respected. They supplied some of the experts now leading the Obama administration's effort to reform the nation's health-care system.

-----

http://wolandscat.net/2009/10/18/the-crisis-in-e-health-standards-iii-solutions/#more-65

The crisis in e-health standards III – solutions

Stakeholder Aspirations and Needs

Before going so far as to offer a solution to the e-health standards problem, I want to have a look at what we consider to be the requirements that such standards, and indeed health informatics in general is meant to address.

-----

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/business/18stream.html?_r=1

October 18, 2009

Slipstream

When 2+2 Equals a Privacy Question

By NATASHA SINGER

TIME to revisit the always compelling — and often disconcerting — debate over digital privacy. So, what might your movie picks and your medical records have in common?

-----

Enjoy!

David.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

NEHTA Releases an Annual Report for 2008-9. What Fun!

Oh dear. Spin Central from NEHTA rolls on.

Here is page 5 of the report. You find the spin (Italics are a clue)!

Introduction to e-health

E-health is the electronic collection, management, use, storage and sharing of healthcare information. This information can include individual items such as test results, discharge summaries, vaccination history, medication history and diagnoses, to comprehensive medical records which keep all of this information about a person in one place.

The governments of Australia recognise that e-health and an Individual Electronic Health Record (IEHR) are vital to the achievement of major health reform in the next decade.

E-health systems that can securely and efficiently exchange data can significantly improve how important clinical and administrative information is communicated between healthcare professionals.

As a result, e-health systems have the potential to unlock substantially greater quality, safety and efficiency benefits.

E-health has the capacity to benefit all Australians – individual consumers, healthcare providers and healthcare funders.

The National E-Health Transition Authority Limited (NEHTA) is a company established by the Australian, State and Territory governments in 2005 to develop better ways of electronically collecting and securely exchanging health information.

As a collaborative vehicle, NEHTA has been assigned responsibility for a number of related projects aimed at establishing the foundations for the widespread and rapid adoption of electronic health (e-health).

----- End Extract.

Has anyone noticed Australian Government commitment to this. Given the Health Department Secretary’s most recent comment I do not think so.

The most amazing figures are here:

Employee benefits expense and contractors

2008/9 $30,212,229 – Last Year $27,041,497

Consultants

2008/9 $26,148,157 – Last Year $2,293,259

The consultant budget rose by 1000% in a time of un-employment – why not just employ the people? What a money trough for those involved!

Why no detailed explanation of this amazing rise?

Read the full report here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/component/docman/doc_download/857-nehta-annual-report-2008-2009

David.